Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 79 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Ter Jern Wolf
STK Scientific The Initiative.
11
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 21:16:45 -
[1591] - Quote
Radkiel wrote:Ter Jern Wolf wrote:Skill Deficiency wrote:RKJakTup wrote: and i lost 5 T2 fighter last week thats 50 mil. other ships dont spend 50 in ammo doing pve. Than use the other ship; are you that bad at EVE you are not using the best ship for the job or is the ship worth using even with this drawback and thus your point is of little value or concern? Which is it? One ship is not going to be the best choice for everything in the game - get into some other ships and try them on for size. So I found a way to increase my carrier ratting ticks and the math shows it will work post patch. Instead of letting my alt just sit around with her thumb up some orifice or another I stick her in a little angry making agro ship... drop her on the anom first and set off all the agro alarms I can... While I can't guarantee the extra 15% more likely to want to shoot fighters won't change the balance of the agro generators needed to **** the rats off enough to focus on the bait - that is just a matter of tuning. Further since I don't carrier rat on more than one account anyhow - I'm still making the exact same - if not BETTER isk than i was before. so =P CCP. What ship are you using?
Seems most anything "can" work but to take advantage of the rat preferences - they hate logi / indy ships most - and they despise any form of active logi or boosting. The noctis doesn't have enough tank at least the way i've tried so far to just sit and take it, but if I manage it while I manage the carrier I can clean the anom as I do it. I'm thinking of maybe trying a scorpion next to see if I can still generate the same agro while passive tanking the dps.
|
Radkiel
HIgh Sec Care Bears Brothers of Tangra
13
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 21:25:34 -
[1592] - Quote
Ter Jern Wolf wrote:Radkiel wrote:Ter Jern Wolf wrote:Skill Deficiency wrote:RKJakTup wrote: and i lost 5 T2 fighter last week thats 50 mil. other ships dont spend 50 in ammo doing pve. Than use the other ship; are you that bad at EVE you are not using the best ship for the job or is the ship worth using even with this drawback and thus your point is of little value or concern? Which is it? One ship is not going to be the best choice for everything in the game - get into some other ships and try them on for size. So I found a way to increase my carrier ratting ticks and the math shows it will work post patch. Instead of letting my alt just sit around with her thumb up some orifice or another I stick her in a little angry making agro ship... drop her on the anom first and set off all the agro alarms I can... While I can't guarantee the extra 15% more likely to want to shoot fighters won't change the balance of the agro generators needed to **** the rats off enough to focus on the bait - that is just a matter of tuning. Further since I don't carrier rat on more than one account anyhow - I'm still making the exact same - if not BETTER isk than i was before. so =P CCP. What ship are you using? Seems most anything "can" work but to take advantage of the rat preferences - they hate logi / indy ships most - and they despise any form of active logi or boosting. The noctis doesn't have enough tank at least the way i've tried so far to just sit and take it, but if I manage it while I manage the carrier I can clean the anom as I do it. I'm thinking of maybe trying a scorpion next to see if I can still generate the same agro while passive tanking the dps.
Thanks for the advice. |
Thomas DeTorquemada
Ranger Industries Jamyl Syndicate
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 21:25:36 -
[1593] - Quote
Ridiculous preteen Mentality....
I give it two months when number of subscribers have dropped along with the revenue, then coax them back with a buff and an admission of 'we got it wrong' subtly placed somewhere in the patch.
Target the problem of the loot drop in the first place and the bounty.
Next it'll be ' we dont need guns anymore on ships, start throwing buns instead'
Do you really think this is the way to assure game longevity? come on devs, do the right thing
|
Kaze Mester
Ascendance Goonswarm Federation
39
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 21:35:38 -
[1594] - Quote
Thomas DeTorquemada wrote:Ridiculous preteen Mentality....
I give it two months when number of subscribers have dropped along with the revenue, then coax them back with a buff and an admission of 'we got it wrong' subtly placed somewhere in the patch.
Target the problem of the loot drop in the first place and the bounty.
Next it'll be ' we dont need guns anymore on ships, start throwing buns instead'
Do you really think this is the way to assure game longevity? come on devs, do the right thing
Until they "figure this out" i'll be long gone for sure. NOTHING guarantees that after they come back CCP just changes it back again. I don't think anyone wants to play with a game in a long run if it is not predictable at least 1%. EVE now is unpredictable in all ways. |
Valaba
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 21:37:35 -
[1595] - Quote
If you do this, at the same time how about nerfing permanent cloaky afk players who drop blops fleets on carriers that reside in your system all day. Take away their ability to stay cloaked for 10 hours straight without needing to be at their keyboard. I don't even rat anymore whenever the known hotdroppers are on which changes my Isk to 0/hr already with the carrier.
You guys are behind times of whats really going on in Eve. Your data is from too long ago and not current. |
Kaze Mester
Ascendance Goonswarm Federation
39
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 21:42:56 -
[1596] - Quote
Valaba wrote:If you do this, at the same time how about nerfing permanent cloaky afk players who drop blops fleets on carriers that reside in your system all day. Take away their ability to stay cloaked for 10 hours straight without needing to be at their keyboard. I don't even rat anymore whenever the known hotdroppers are on which changes my Isk to 0/hr already with the carrier.
You guys are behind times of whats really going on in Eve. Your data is from too long ago and not current.
As we now know from CCP datawhoeverguy, they don't even play their own game for sure. I would be suprised if they know what you are talking about. They only see numbers, data and diagrams. They don't care about player morale and customer statisfaction. |
Mariza vonAmdonen
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 21:48:33 -
[1597] - Quote
Thomas DeTorquemada wrote:Ridiculous preteen Mentality....
I give it two months when number of subscribers have dropped along with the revenue, then coax them back with a buff and an admission of 'we got it wrong' subtly placed somewhere in the patch.
Target the problem of the loot drop in the first place and the bounty.
Next it'll be ' we dont need guns anymore on ships, start throwing buns instead' Ratters will keep on ratting but you've upset the pvp population way more imo, unjustifiably
Do you really think this is the way to assure game longevity? come on devs, do the right thing
they dont want nerf all ratting, just carrier/super-ratting thatw OP.
I've been watching PLEX prices since this 'uprising' and guess what they are steadily rising. no indication of significant loss of subscribers
|
CoffinQueen
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
19
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 21:49:06 -
[1598] - Quote
Kaze Mester wrote:Valaba wrote:If you do this, at the same time how about nerfing permanent cloaky afk players who drop blops fleets on carriers that reside in your system all day. Take away their ability to stay cloaked for 10 hours straight without needing to be at their keyboard. I don't even rat anymore whenever the known hotdroppers are on which changes my Isk to 0/hr already with the carrier.
You guys are behind times of whats really going on in Eve. Your data is from too long ago and not current. As we now know from CCP datawhoeverguy, they don't even play their own game for sure. I would be suprised if they know what you are talking about. They only see numbers, data and diagrams. They don't care about player morale and customer statisfaction.
Yea, everybodie's SO mean in eve.... sniff. Come on CCP, change that, make them play nice.
|
blaedin jordan
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
12
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 21:53:53 -
[1599] - Quote
Kaze Mester wrote:Radkiel wrote:Ter Jern Wolf wrote:Skill Deficiency wrote:RKJakTup wrote: and i lost 5 T2 fighter last week thats 50 mil. other ships dont spend 50 in ammo doing pve. Than use the other ship; are you that bad at EVE you are not using the best ship for the job or is the ship worth using even with this drawback and thus your point is of little value or concern? Which is it? One ship is not going to be the best choice for everything in the game - get into some other ships and try them on for size. So I found a way to increase my carrier ratting ticks and the math shows it will work post patch. Instead of letting my alt just sit around with her thumb up some orifice or another I stick her in a little angry making agro ship... drop her on the anom first and set off all the agro alarms I can... While I can't guarantee the extra 15% more likely to want to shoot fighters won't change the balance of the agro generators needed to **** the rats off enough to focus on the bait - that is just a matter of tuning. Further since I don't carrier rat on more than one account anyhow - I'm still making the exact same - if not BETTER isk than i was before. so =P CCP. What ship are you using? Peeps, we are getting off topic here. This thing is not about making more isk or at least the same ammount of isk...it is about killing a capital class in a second. This s not about the "too much isk is in the game bullsh*t". It is about something else. Btw...deleting posts shows that at least one dev/mod reads our comments here...still no statement from CCP.
I agree. CCP's silence coupled with the very sneaky way this was added in at the last minute is disgusting, I've lost a lot of respect from a company I used to defend--this is just not the way I thought they would ever treat us.
|
Thomas DeTorquemada
Ranger Industries Jamyl Syndicate
2
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 21:59:32 -
[1600] - Quote
Mariza vonAmdonen wrote:Thomas DeTorquemada wrote:Ridiculous preteen Mentality....
I give it two months when number of subscribers have dropped along with the revenue, then coax them back with a buff and an admission of 'we got it wrong' subtly placed somewhere in the patch.
Target the problem of the loot drop in the first place and the bounty.
Next it'll be ' we dont need guns anymore on ships, start throwing buns instead' Ratters will keep on ratting but you've upset the pvp population way more imo, unjustifiably
Do you really think this is the way to assure game longevity? come on devs, do the right thing they dont want nerf all ratting, just carrier/super-ratting thatw OP. I've been watching PLEX prices since this 'uprising' and guess what they are steadily rising. no indication of significant loss of subscribers
but by doing so they upset us PvP players, there's easier ways to target the problem rather than apply a quick fix that affects other player types
Reduce anomoly sites and the loot table. theres a big void in the balancing between a sub-cap and say a dread and then a Titan. A Friday announcement for a following Tuesday patch? very sneaky and underhand imo. some wouldnt have even skilled into/bought/build a Carrier. what a waste |
|
blaedin jordan
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 22:08:43 -
[1601] - Quote
...or just leave the dang system alone and implement isk sinks to help add more character, options, and flare to the game. I mean, where is the creativity? How about allowing characters to rent skins for 7 days for x amount of isk? How about not nerfing capital ships by 20% damage until the CSMs can be involved in the discussion? How about stalling this update, showing a little respect for the playerbase, and working WITH us to find a solution versus against us?
Maybe they need some leadership changes in management, maybe not, but this is not the way players end-game investments should be effectively glitchslapped around by any dev-team. |
Lumpz0r
The Taquito Stand Rate My Ticks
5
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 22:09:00 -
[1602] - Quote
CCP Larrikin wrote: This trend is unsustainable. Having such a large ISK faucet is bad for the economy, and this ISK faucet is concentrated to a relatively small number of players.
if the observation is that this is a SMALL NUMBER OF PLAYERS causing the problem battering a HUGE amount of your player base with this nerf is in no way a resolution to the issue.
that said as CCP never reply to posts other than to tell you to stop trolling and don't actually listen to their player base they just do what they want (i mean they make the game why not do what they want and forget the people who actually pay them to play) we just have to suck it up and crack on.
i only recently came back to eve and moved to null.. as a player who's solo most of the time i don't make DANK ISK like whom ever these "small number of players" are but i assume i deserve the nerf too afterall i do pay for the game
Oooo i hear world of warcraft is nice these days |
sakpuncher
Angry Rock Killers Inc. Serrice Council.
4
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 22:13:49 -
[1603] - Quote
Lumpz0r wrote:CCP Larrikin wrote: This trend is unsustainable. Having such a large ISK faucet is bad for the economy, and this ISK faucet is concentrated to a relatively small number of players.
if the observation is that this is a SMALL NUMBER OF PLAYERS causing the problem battering a HUGE amount of your player base with this nerf is in no way a resolution to the issue. that said as CCP never reply to posts other than to tell you to stop trolling and don't actually listen to their player base they just do what they want (i mean they make the game why not do what they want and forget the people who actually pay them to play) we just have to suck it up and crack on. i only recently came back to eve and moved to null.. as a player who's solo most of the time i don't make DANK ISK like whom ever these "small number of players" are but i assume i deserve the nerf too afterall i do pay for the game Oooo i hear world of warcraft is nice these days
agreed on the not being part of the small % that makes so much money they dont know what to do with. however i disagree witht eh WoW statement it still sucks |
Ter Jern Wolf
STK Scientific The Initiative.
11
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 22:25:05 -
[1604] - Quote
Thomas DeTorquemada wrote:Mariza vonAmdonen wrote:Thomas DeTorquemada wrote:Ridiculous preteen Mentality....
I give it two months when number of subscribers have dropped along with the revenue, then coax them back with a buff and an admission of 'we got it wrong' subtly placed somewhere in the patch.
Target the problem of the loot drop in the first place and the bounty.
Next it'll be ' we dont need guns anymore on ships, start throwing buns instead' Ratters will keep on ratting but you've upset the pvp population way more imo, unjustifiably
Do you really think this is the way to assure game longevity? come on devs, do the right thing they dont want nerf all ratting, just carrier/super-ratting thatw OP. I've been watching PLEX prices since this 'uprising' and guess what they are steadily rising. no indication of significant loss of subscribers but by doing so they upset us PvP players, there's easier ways to target the problem rather than apply a quick fix that affects other player types Reduce anomoly sites and the loot table. there's a big void in the balancing between a sub-cap and say a dread and then a Titan. A Friday announcement for a following Tuesday patch? very sneaky and underhand imo. some would'nt have even skilled into/bought/built a Carrier. what a waste
Also the day after the end of a juicy plex sale... almost like they didn't want to drop the bomb until after they raked in all the cash from the sales... where they dropped the rorq changes publicly and gave it a bit to cool off before starting the sale. Almost like they knew this was a bad call and thought maybe it would hurt sales if they announced it properly. |
Jang Taredi
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 22:41:02 -
[1605] - Quote
This is the second largest thread in the section. Do what's right, devs. |
Kaze Mester
Ascendance Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 22:44:01 -
[1606] - Quote
Jang Taredi wrote:This is the second largest thread in the section. Do what's right, devs.
Work? |
Jang Taredi
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 22:55:41 -
[1607] - Quote
Kaze Mester wrote:Jang Taredi wrote:This is the second largest thread in the section. Do what's right, devs. Work?
Without the "Greed is Good" mentality, perhaps. |
Cismet
Hard-line Syndicate Serrice Council.
84
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 23:07:44 -
[1608] - Quote
Jang Taredi wrote:This is the second largest thread in the section. Do what's right, devs.
They're too busy with their fingers in their ears, saying "It's only 1% of 1%, it's only 1% of 1%" over and over and over and over in the hope that it becomes true, rather than the massive number across here and Reddit. If they say it enough times it might be true.....
|
Jang Taredi
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 23:11:50 -
[1609] - Quote
I wonder if CCP also accounted for all the supers/carriers that got hotdropped, or fighter losses. |
Miss 'Assassination' Cayman
CK-0FF LowSechnaya Sholupen
210
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 23:30:37 -
[1610] - Quote
Mariza vonAmdonen wrote:Thomas DeTorquemada wrote:Ridiculous preteen Mentality....
I give it two months when number of subscribers have dropped along with the revenue, then coax them back with a buff and an admission of 'we got it wrong' subtly placed somewhere in the patch.
Target the problem of the loot drop in the first place and the bounty.
Next it'll be ' we dont need guns anymore on ships, start throwing buns instead' Ratters will keep on ratting but you've upset the pvp population way more imo, unjustifiably
Do you really think this is the way to assure game longevity? come on devs, do the right thing they dont want to nerf all ratting, just carrier/super-ratting that is OP. I've been watching PLEX prices since this 'uprising' and guess what they are steadily rising. no indication of significant loss of subscribers PLEX prices wouldn't be an indicator this soon anyway. Before leaving I put all my ISK into PLEX and other investments I expect to increase in value, because I have 0% confidence in CCP's attempts to stop inflation if this is what they're trying. I probably bought 3-4 months worth of my normal PLEX consumption so my disappearance actually contributed to a temporary increase in PLEX price at the moment. |
|
Mariza vonAmdonen
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 23:51:01 -
[1611] - Quote
Miss 'Assassination' Cayman wrote:Mariza vonAmdonen wrote:Thomas DeTorquemada wrote:Ridiculous preteen Mentality....
I give it two months when number of subscribers have dropped along with the revenue, then coax them back with a buff and an admission of 'we got it wrong' subtly placed somewhere in the patch.
Target the problem of the loot drop in the first place and the bounty.
Next it'll be ' we dont need guns anymore on ships, start throwing buns instead' Ratters will keep on ratting but you've upset the pvp population way more imo, unjustifiably
Do you really think this is the way to assure game longevity? come on devs, do the right thing they dont want to nerf all ratting, just carrier/super-ratting that is OP. I've been watching PLEX prices since this 'uprising' and guess what they are steadily rising. no indication of significant loss of subscribers PLEX prices wouldn't be an indicator this soon anyway. Before leaving I put all my ISK into PLEX and other investments I expect to increase in value, because I have 0% confidence in CCP's attempts to stop inflation if this is what they're trying. I probably bought 3-4 months worth of my normal PLEX consumption so my disappearance actually contributed to a temporary increase in PLEX price at the moment.
so, effectively, you are not leaving. Just pretending so, by temporary disappearing.
|
Crash 888
TRINTEX
16
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 00:35:10 -
[1612] - Quote
In 6 months no one will even remember any of this.
Just as how no one remembers that goons raged about the new Citadel fighters and were going to give up carrier ratting altogether and move to reactions |
Tom Ocilithon
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 00:42:50 -
[1613] - Quote
Right then. There's practically no point adding to the mountain of **** that's gone down already, but here goes:
So I'm a new cap pilot, just bought myself a shiny new thanatos. I've spent a year training for this, and I've spent just shy of 5 billion ISK on it. I look forward to ratting with it, possibly make back the time and money I've put into this thing.
Suddenly - "Fighter damage reduction", and I think "Oh. It'll be something like a 5% reduction. 10% If we're being serious." Hmm.
I don't understand what CCP are thinking. A 20% nerf to fighter damage is insane. I've only just got my hands on a carrier, and I'm having 700dps just lopped off of my initial 3500dps. I've been training for this for a third of my EVE career, and I've been grinding for this thing, only to have it stomped on as I get it. Thanks. To make things easier, someone has obviously had the great idea of "Oh, lets give everyone 5 days notice before we drop this!" Just enough time to do... oh wait. Nothing.
I must admit. I was worried that it was the 1st of April, and I'd just gone mad. But at this point, it looks like those damned "Biomass converters" might genuinely be added, which would still be more balanced than these fighter changes.
The forum post mentioned that "This ISK faucet is concentrated to a relatively small number of players." well, I'd like to point out that this is called "Progression"! This is what makes EVE actually fun! There's always something bigger and shinier, and carriers are a large part of the higher up progression elements of EVE. This is the point - for a relatively small number of people to be at the top of a progression distribution in terms of players by character skill and by extension, age.
Now, I am highly against the idea of just un-subbing, it seems a damn sight close to blackmailing the developers into giving us what we want and not thinking about the overall balance of the game. But when such an obviously harmful nerf is dropped with 5 days worth of notice, that basically makes the last year worth of grinding and skill training redundant, I am furious. And that's extremely difficult for a British person to say. I have dropped my subscription, with the only regret that my re-sub happened too recently.
CCP, please genuinely listen to our feedback. We have a wonderful game which has been built by both developers and the community. Do not **** it up like this.
TL:DR - These fighter changes can **** off. |
Jang Taredi
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 01:11:44 -
[1614] - Quote
Tom Ocilithon wrote:Right then. There's practically no point adding to the mountain of **** that's gone down already, but here goes:
So I'm a new cap pilot, just bought myself a shiny new thanatos. I've spent a year training for this, and I've spent just shy of 5 billion ISK on it. I look forward to ratting with it, possibly make back the time and money I've put into this thing.
Suddenly - "Fighter damage reduction", and I think "Oh. It'll be something like a 5% reduction. 10% If we're being serious." Hmm.
I don't understand what CCP are thinking. A 20% nerf to fighter damage is insane. I've only just got my hands on a carrier, and I'm having 700dps just lopped off of my initial 3500dps. I've been training for this for a third of my EVE career, and I've been grinding for this thing, only to have it stomped on as I get it. Thanks. To make things easier, someone has obviously had the great idea of "Oh, lets give everyone 5 days notice before we drop this!" Just enough time to do... oh wait. Nothing.
I must admit. I was worried that it was the 1st of April, and I'd just gone mad. But at this point, it looks like those damned "Biomass converters" might genuinely be added, which would still be more balanced than these fighter changes.
The forum post mentioned that "This ISK faucet is concentrated to a relatively small number of players." well, I'd like to point out that this is called "Progression"! This is what makes EVE actually fun! There's always something bigger and shinier, and carriers are a large part of the higher up progression elements of EVE. This is the point - for a relatively small number of people to be at the top of a progression distribution in terms of players by character skill and by extension, age.
Now, I am highly against the idea of just un-subbing, it seems a damn sight close to blackmailing the developers into giving us what we want and not thinking about the overall balance of the game. But when such an obviously harmful nerf is dropped with 5 days worth of notice, that basically makes the last year worth of grinding and skill training redundant, I am furious. And that's extremely difficult for a British person to say. I have dropped my subscription, with the only regret that my re-sub happened too recently.
CCP, please genuinely listen to our feedback. We have a wonderful game which has been built by both developers and the community. Do not **** it up like this.
TL:DR - These fighter changes can **** off.
I've friends that were training and having supercarriers built, only to have the same happen. Their 20bil ships will only be worth 15bil, as well. |
Ezio Sotken
nul-li-fy Circle-Of-Two
25
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 01:41:57 -
[1615] - Quote
Jang Taredi wrote:Tom Ocilithon wrote:Right then. There's practically no point adding to the mountain of **** that's gone down already, but here goes:
So I'm a new cap pilot, just bought myself a shiny new thanatos. I've spent a year training for this, and I've spent just shy of 5 billion ISK on it. I look forward to ratting with it, possibly make back the time and money I've put into this thing.
Suddenly - "Fighter damage reduction", and I think "Oh. It'll be something like a 5% reduction. 10% If we're being serious." Hmm.
I don't understand what CCP are thinking. A 20% nerf to fighter damage is insane. I've only just got my hands on a carrier, and I'm having 700dps just lopped off of my initial 3500dps. I've been training for this for a third of my EVE career, and I've been grinding for this thing, only to have it stomped on as I get it. Thanks. To make things easier, someone has obviously had the great idea of "Oh, lets give everyone 5 days notice before we drop this!" Just enough time to do... oh wait. Nothing.
I must admit. I was worried that it was the 1st of April, and I'd just gone mad. But at this point, it looks like those damned "Biomass converters" might genuinely be added, which would still be more balanced than these fighter changes.
The forum post mentioned that "This ISK faucet is concentrated to a relatively small number of players." well, I'd like to point out that this is called "Progression"! This is what makes EVE actually fun! There's always something bigger and shinier, and carriers are a large part of the higher up progression elements of EVE. This is the point - for a relatively small number of people to be at the top of a progression distribution in terms of players by character skill and by extension, age.
Now, I am highly against the idea of just un-subbing, it seems a damn sight close to blackmailing the developers into giving us what we want and not thinking about the overall balance of the game. But when such an obviously harmful nerf is dropped with 5 days worth of notice, that basically makes the last year worth of grinding and skill training redundant, I am furious. And that's extremely difficult for a British person to say. I have dropped my subscription, with the only regret that my re-sub happened too recently.
CCP, please genuinely listen to our feedback. We have a wonderful game which has been built by both developers and the community. Do not **** it up like this.
TL:DR - These fighter changes can **** off. I've friends that were training and having supercarriers built, only to have the same happen. Their 20bil ships will only be worth 15bil, as well.
15 bil if they are lucky. If they bought an aeon or wyvern....yea gonna suck. |
Miss 'Assassination' Cayman
CK-0FF LowSechnaya Sholupen
210
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 01:43:53 -
[1616] - Quote
Mariza vonAmdonen wrote:Miss 'Assassination' Cayman wrote:PLEX prices wouldn't be an indicator this soon anyway. Before leaving I put all my ISK into PLEX and other investments I expect to increase in value, because I have 0% confidence in CCP's attempts to stop inflation if this is what they're trying. I probably bought 3-4 months worth of my normal PLEX consumption so my disappearance actually contributed to a temporary increase in PLEX price at the moment. so, effectively, you are not leaving. Just pretending so, by temporary disappearing. I intend to disappear however long it takes CCP to change the direction of development to something more positive. Whether that's a month or forever is beside the point. I love Eve and want it to be great, and there's still a chance it can be. I haven't lost hope for the game, but I have lost faith. If things don't change for the better I won't be back, but I sincerely hope the direction does improve so I can come back some day. I'd be a fool not to prepare for that possibility in what little way I can. |
SoundKonducta
Boa Innovations Brothers of Tangra
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 02:55:48 -
[1617] - Quote
Extremely disappointing decision made here...should've just made it so supers cannot warp to anoms. CCP please stop nerfing everything so ridiculously hard so it breaks ships =( |
lolzz Quekz
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 04:09:46 -
[1618] - Quote
and CCP_falcon said feedback should be posted back at forums as its easier for dev to respond hiding their asses like medieval fat overlords when the peasants are revolting and screaming "dont let them in guards!" |
Joe Barbarian
I'm fine and You aren't Goonswarm Federation
27
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 04:14:16 -
[1619] - Quote
Rumour has it that that if we hit 100 pages the changes will be reversed. |
lolzz Quekz
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
1
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 04:20:19 -
[1620] - Quote
on the hindsight, carriers are most people's end game content because its the most versatile cap available and of cos being a jack-of-all-trades cap its capabilities after the first nerf is was still reasonable but this nerf almost pushes carriers down one tier, carrier into T2 sub-caps and super-carriers into normal cap class unless this is your intent somewhere down your roadmap.
and if it is your intention please do make appropriate changes esp in mineral cost to put them around the cost of a fitted marauder to justify the use of carriers.
and basically what you are also telling us is that "capital ships were never intended to be use as an isk making tool if so HAW guns on dreads needs to be look at too i believe it is possible to rat drifters? with HAW guns" dont just nerf fighters cause "its making too much money" |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 79 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |