Originally by: CCP Sharkbait

---

we are screwed.

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

If you think the Patch Notes are long, imagine being on the team that had to write them!

---

Originally by: Virtuozzo

---

So, no love for the new regions?
What am I missing?

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

Originally by: Virtuozzo

---

So, no love for the new regions?
What am I missing?

---

Way down in the Miscellaneous section: Asteroid distribution in the eight new regions also known as the rogue drone regions has been redone, rare end asteroid types such as arkonor should be much larger than before.

Some love there and please keep in mind there will be further additions made over the weekend as other items clear the QA process.

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

Level 5 pirate agents will be released in the future, they are not slated for this expansion deployment.

---

Originally by: CCP Valar

---

Please use the downtime to pray (to any deity of your choice) for the poor Operations DBAs that have to perform the patch deployment.

---

Originally by: CCP Valar

---

Please use the downtime to pray (to any deity of your choice) for the poor Operations DBAs that have to perform the patch deployment.

---

Quote:

---

Your powers of perseverance are impressive!

---

Originally by: Patchnotes

---

What, you didn't honestly think we were going to list the exploit fixes before the patch, did you?

---

Originally by: kieron

---

The Ibis was never intended to be a solo OMGWTF mission-farming PWNmobile.

---

Originally by: chrisreeves

---

Kieron or whomever

What is going to be done in order to assist with organization in carriers now that you are removing the ability for us to use GSC in an industrial in a carrier?

It is hell to organize in a freighter and now it will be hell to organize in a carrier. Any suggestions beside the idiotic ones of "get a titan" that some have said?

See thread below please.

http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=534527

---

Quote:

---

# BPC's are now retrievable if you made them at a starbase owned by another member of your alliance.

---

Originally by: Tonto Auri

---

Rest in peace, it just boosting of large alliances and nerfing of small corps.
"No one will be able to compete BoB"

---

Quote:

---

Client Changes
Changes to user settings, capture and logs :

* In Windows XP & Windows 2000: User Settings :
C:\Documents and Settings\%user%\Local Settings\Application Data\CCP\EVE
* Capture and logs:
C:\Documents and Settings\%user%\My Documents\EVE

* In Windows Vista : User settings :
C:\Users\%user%\AppData\Local\CCP\EVE
* Capture and logs:
C:\Users\%user%\Documents\EVE

This can be reset to the pre-Revelations II location by adding: "/end /LUA:OFF" after the "C:\Program Files\CCP\EVE\eve.exe" target in the target box in your shortcut. After this adjustment, settings and data are saved as they were saved pre-Revelations II. The shortcut should appear aS follows: "C:\Program Files\CCP\EVE\eve.exe" /end /LUA:OFF

---

Quote:

---

Increased CPU use and decreased power need on Energized Adaptive Nano Membranes.

---

Quote:

---

# The Bhaalgorn now displays its 8th turret correctly.

---

Quote:

---

All structures now have appropriate signature radius assigned to them, making it harder for larger ships to acquire lock on smaller structures; large have 400m, medium have 125m and small have 30m.

---

Originally by: Snake Jankins

---

Guess this one has already been said/answered somewhere, but:

Changes to user settings, capture and logs :

* In Windows XP & Windows 2000: User Settings :
C:\Documents and Settings\%user%\Local Settings\Application Data\CCP\EVE

I assume that this is just mentioned as the standard case in the patch-notes and that EVE actually uses the path that is set in the system environment without any trouble.

---

Originally by: Beka Rosselin

---

"Jump Bridges allow instant travel between starbases. They must be paired to another bridge within 5 AU" ... I sure hope you meant 5 LY, what's the point of these if they can only link to the next planet over?

---

Originally by: Hellspawn01

---

Quote:

---

Changes to user settings, capture and logs :

* In Windows XP & Windows 2000: User Settings :
C:\Documents and Settings\%user%\Local Settings\Application Data\CCP\EVE
* Capture and logs:
C:\Documents and Settings\%user%\My Documents\EVE

* In Windows Vista : User settings :
C:\Users\%user%\AppData\Local\CCP\EVE
* Capture and logs:
C:\Users\%user%\Documents\EVE

---

First of all, stupid change. 2nd, WTF?! That is totaly unnecessary.

---

Quote:

---

Stop skimming and keep reading! -= Science and Industry

---

Quote:

---

Titans can no longer fire doomsday devices remotely.
Titans can not jump for the next 10 minutes after firing a doomsday device.

---

Originally by: Callistus

---

Originally by: Beka Rosselin

---

"Jump Bridges allow instant travel between starbases. They must be paired to another bridge within 5 AU" ... I sure hope you meant 5 LY, what's the point of these if they can only link to the next planet over?

---

lol, that's a typo. The value on the test server is 5 LY.

---

Originally by: Athelas Loraiel

---

Why not repair drones to be able to damage containers properly like other guns??

---

Originally by: "Ridiculously Long and Informative Blog"

---

Flashes from Citadel TorpedoÆs when they explode have been toned down.

---

Quote:

---

- Numbers alone do not win a battle
- No, but I bet they help.

---

Quote:

---

Heat

Adding a new dimension to space combat in EVE, Revelations II brings you Heat: the ability to verload starship modules for a temporary boost in performance, but at the risk of damaging the module.

---

Quote:

---

The overview is now 'in front' of the in space icons. This will prevent accidental targeting of the wrong target when the icon and the overview entry are in the same place on screen.

---

Quote:

---

Increased CPU use and decreased power need on Energized Adaptive Nano Membranes.

---

Originally by: AceOfSpace

---

"Large Hull Repairer II can not be invented from the tech 1 version."

Why not?

---

Quote:

---

Fixed a problem where the calculator would lag, and some button presses would be lost.

---

Quote:

---

Tech 2 Ammo can now be invented

---

Originally by: Tao Han

---

"TANK CEO!!!"
Quick Wrangler, to the Banmobile!!!

---

Originally by: Lady Natacha

---

CCP, PLEASE!!!

Consider testing all this stuff for at least 2 more weeks before deploying, especially if the list of bugs on the known issues page has not been resolved completely.

---

Originally by: Jimer Lins

---

Couple of questions about the onboard scanner. I've spent a long time working on my exploration skills and I don't want to see them become useless- the oboard scanner has a 5AU range, better than the most long-range exploration probe except the multispec.

Given it's extremely short scan time, even with a cripplingly low 25 points of sensor strength, I wonder if it'll be practical to simply take a noobchar in a starter frigate to every planet in a system and scanspam to find higher end content.

You'd have a small chance of finding something and with a scan time of 30 seconds, you'd be able to do 10 scans in the time it takes a moderately accomplished exploration pilot to do one.

Only time will tell, but I don't want to see the free scanner become a cheap and effective alternative to the dedication it takes to do real exploration properly.

Given how small the sensor strength is, I'm not *too* worried about this, and can actually see how it might be useful for normal explorers to quickly eliminate hits that are low-end which they'd otherwise waste time scanning down.

Still- 5AU? Seems kind of long range.

---

Originally by: Slate Fistcrunch

---

"Attacking the starbase of a war target in high security space would occasionally result in a global criminal flag. This no longer occurs."

Does this mean that hi-sec research towers are now vulnerable to war-decs? Surely you would've given the community more warning than a single sentence buried in the patch notes.

Everyone knows lab slots are overloaded in empire. Research towers are an (expensive) way to overcome the problem. If you allow them to be pirated in hi sec with a war dec you are landing a crippling blow on the industrial side of the player base. They don't even work properly yet; you can't allow others to rent out your research slots and copying / invention from within the alliance is horribly bugged as you should know from the many "move my items out of his lab" petitions.

That whole "let invention help the T2 market," yeah that will be given a huge setback by the primary source of copy slots being put at risk if I read your patch notes correctly.

---

Originally by: murder one

---

Originally by: Jimer Lins

---

[snip[

---

So basically you're whining because you're worried that the upcoming change as somehow mitigated your investment in probing skills in some way shape or form.

[snip]

---

Quote:

---

Logging out inside a starbase forcefield will now not activate an emergency warp, provided that you have rights to stay inside the forcefield.

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

The attributes of Nosferatu modules have been modified. How? The Undead prefer to keep their secrets.

---

Originally by: Slate Fistcrunch

---

"Attacking the starbase of a war target in high security space would occasionally result in a global criminal flag. This no longer occurs."

Does this mean that hi-sec research towers are now vulnerable to war-decs? Surely you would've given the community more warning than a single sentence buried in the patch notes.

---

Originally by: Matuk Grymwal

---

Also as posted above what is a fedo?

---

Originally by: William Hamilton

---

^Not who, what.

They're like sea urchins, but slimier, and not in the sea.

---

Originally by: Konquera McCall

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

The attributes of Nosferatu modules have been modified. How? The Undead prefer to keep their secrets.

---

Zoinks!

---

Originally by: CCP Wrangler

---

You're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, thats what hello kitty online is for.

---

Quote:

---

Freighters can now scoop unanchored starbase structures. Note that the requirement of being within 50km to an online control tower is still present.

---

Originally by: Hellman109

---

The correct paths should be changed as per below, because they will be correct in all cases:

In Windows XP & Windows 2000:
User Settings :
%userprofile%\Local Settings\Application Data\CCP\EVE
Capture and logs:
%userprofile%\My Documents\EVE
In Windows Vista :
User settings :
%userprofile%\AppData\Local\CCP\EVE
Capture and logs:
%userprofile%\Documents\EVE

Not a biggie, but I did notice it

---

Originally by: Taraw

---

Originally by: Hellman109

---

The correct paths should be changed as per below, because they will be correct in all cases:

In Windows XP & Windows 2000:
User Settings :
%userprofile%\Local Settings\Application Data\CCP\EVE
Capture and logs:
%userprofile%\My Documents\EVE
In Windows Vista :
User settings :
%userprofile%\AppData\Local\CCP\EVE
Capture and logs:
%userprofile%\Documents\EVE

Not a biggie, but I did notice it

---

Actually, no, it's not correct in all cases.
Here in germany it's "Eigene Dateien" instead of "My Documents" for example

---

Originally by: Kaptein Trefot

---

More about missions:

Only 10 agents for each faction? Are you trying to get a Guinness world record for worst lag? I guess there will only be 4 agents with highest quality (whatever that is in low sec), one of each empire faction. You probably made 4 new lag hells in one go. Who wants to be the first to move their cap ships in there?

About the rest - Great work. Tanks

---

Quote:

---

òPurifier: 135m3 -> 260m3,
òNemesis: 155m3 -> 215m3,
òHound: 145m3 -> 195m3,
òManticore: 120m3 -> 185m3.

---

Quote:

---

So when is all this coming?

Well, as an example, the new graphics engine was started last year and we're hoping we can release it at the end of this year. The other systems aren't as extensive and require less man-years to create.

---

Originally by: Dionisius

---

What about the videos?!

---

Originally by: Baron Steiger

---

Changes to user settings, capture and logs :

* In Windows XP & Windows 2000: User Settings :
C:\Documents and Settings\%user%\Local Settings\Application Data\CCP\EVE
* Capture and logs:
C:\Documents and Settings\%user%\My Documents\EVE

* In Windows Vista : User settings :
C:\Users\%user%\AppData\Local\CCP\EVE
* Capture and logs:
C:\Users\%user%\Documents\EVE

Has anything been done to ensure that data from the test server doesn't overwrite data from the real server?

---

Quote:

---

Improved efficiency of remote armor repairers to be slightly better than shield transporter equivalent. Skill level requirements, range, duration and meta levels now match the shield transporters.

---

Quote:

---

Added CPU requirements to "Shield Power Relays", and balanced the meta levels.

---

Quote:

---

Battlecruiser & Command Ship shield recharge rate changed to 1400 seconds.

---

Quote:

---

Medium Energy neutralizer cap need and energy destabilization amount increased to 180. Range increased to 12600m.

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

If you think the Patch Notes are long, imagine being on the team that had to write them!

---

Quote:

---

So basically you're whining because you're worried that the upcoming change as somehow mitigated your investment in probing skills in some way shape or form.

To wit: if it did, who cares?

---

Originally by: Tobe Confirmed

---

Thankyou CCP. I have for some time been teetering on the edge of cancelling my sub but this injects some freshness back in. Thanks.

One small thing though....

I've read the notes and every post here and no-one has mentioned the 'camera reset after jump' issue?
Any chance of a fix?

---

Quote:

---

Large Hull Repairer II can not be invented from the tech 1 version.

---

Originally by: Mysticaa

---

Quote:

---

Tech 2 Ammo can now be invented

---

Does this include mining crystals?

---

Originally by: Baron Steiger

---

Changes to user settings, capture and logs :

* In Windows XP & Windows 2000: User Settings :
C:\Documents and Settings\%user%\Local Settings\Application Data\CCP\EVE
* Capture and logs:
C:\Documents and Settings\%user%\My Documents\EVE

* In Windows Vista : User settings :
C:\Users\%user%\AppData\Local\CCP\EVE
* Capture and logs:
C:\Users\%user%\Documents\EVE

Has anything been done to ensure that data from the test server doesn't overwrite data from the real server?

---

Quote:

---

* Sovereignty Level 1 (Territory) is achieved by the alliance having more towers (that have been online and claiming sovereignty) for seven days, than any other alliance in the same system
* Sovereignty Level 2 (Protectorate) is reached by maintaining Sovereignty 1 for 14 consecutive days
* Sovereignty Level 3 (Province) is reached by maintaining Sovereignty 2 for a further 14 days. Outposts in systems with Sovereignty 3 can be set as Constellation Capital
* Sovereignty Level 4 (Constellation Capital) is achieved by both having Constellation Sovereignty in the same constellation and holding an outpost with the Constellation Capital option checked for thirty days.
* Constellation Sovereignty is achieved when the following conditions are met for fourteen consecutive days:
o Sovereignty 1 or higher in over half the systems in the constellation
o Three outposts or conquerable stations held within the same constellation
o One outpost has Constellation Capital set
* Starbases in systems with Sovereignty 4 cannot be targeted
* If one or more of the conditions for Constellation Sovereignty is subsequently lost, the constellation becomes Contested for 14 days. If at the end of this period the conditions are met again, Constellation Sovereignty is maintained. If they are not met, Constellation Sovereignty is lost.

---

Originally by: Hellman109

---

Just a bit of a bugbear of mine...

"In Windows XP & Windows 2000:
User Settings :
C:\Documents and Settings\%user%\Local Settings\Application Data\CCP\EVE
Capture and logs:
C:\Documents and Settings\%user%\My Documents\EVE"

These are wrong, purly because the user name does not always match the profile path of that user.

---

Originally by: Tzrailasa

---

The thing CCP should do is remove the Quality factor of agents, and just replace that with your standing towards the agent in LP/reward calculations. That way you could use any agent of the level you want, and people could spread out when your agent system was lagged....

---

Originally by: CCP Greyscale

---

Originally by: Tzrailasa

---

The thing CCP should do is remove the Quality factor of agents, and just replace that with your standing towards the agent in LP/reward calculations. That way you could use any agent of the level you want, and people could spread out when your agent system was lagged....

---

All level 5 agents are Quality 12

---

Originally by: Marie Slick

---

Quote:

---

* Sovereignty Level 1 (Territory) is achieved by the alliance having more towers (that have been online and claiming sovereignty) for seven days, than any other alliance in the same system
* Sovereignty Level 2 (Protectorate) is reached by maintaining Sovereignty 1 for 14 consecutive days
* Sovereignty Level 3 (Province) is reached by maintaining Sovereignty 2 for a further 14 days. Outposts in systems with Sovereignty 3 can be set as Constellation Capital
* Sovereignty Level 4 (Constellation Capital) is achieved by both having Constellation Sovereignty in the same constellation and holding an outpost with the Constellation Capital option checked for thirty days.
* Constellation Sovereignty is achieved when the following conditions are met for fourteen consecutive days:
o Sovereignty 1 or higher in over half the systems in the constellation
o Three outposts or conquerable stations held within the same constellation
o One outpost has Constellation Capital set
* Starbases in systems with Sovereignty 4 cannot be targeted
* If one or more of the conditions for Constellation Sovereignty is subsequently lost, the constellation becomes Contested for 14 days. If at the end of this period the conditions are met again, Constellation Sovereignty is maintained. If they are not met, Constellation Sovereignty is lost.

---

Has the timer started already or does it start the day of the patch?

---

Originally by: CCP Prism X

---

Originally by: Marie Slick

---

Quote:

---

* Sovereignty Level 1 (Territory) is achieved by the alliance having more towers (that have been online and claiming sovereignty) for seven days, than any other alliance in the same system
* Sovereignty Level 2 (Protectorate) is reached by maintaining Sovereignty 1 for 14 consecutive days
* Sovereignty Level 3 (Province) is reached by maintaining Sovereignty 2 for a further 14 days. Outposts in systems with Sovereignty 3 can be set as Constellation Capital
* Sovereignty Level 4 (Constellation Capital) is achieved by both having Constellation Sovereignty in the same constellation and holding an outpost with the Constellation Capital option checked for thirty days.
* Constellation Sovereignty is achieved when the following conditions are met for fourteen consecutive days:
o Sovereignty 1 or higher in over half the systems in the constellation
o Three outposts or conquerable stations held within the same constellation
o One outpost has Constellation Capital set
* Starbases in systems with Sovereignty 4 cannot be targeted
* If one or more of the conditions for Constellation Sovereignty is subsequently lost, the constellation becomes Contested for 14 days. If at the end of this period the conditions are met again, Constellation Sovereignty is maintained. If they are not met, Constellation Sovereignty is lost.

---

Has the timer started already or does it start the day of the patch?

---

It starts at the day of the patch. Wouldn't be very nice of us to start a timer behind the scenes and not tell anyone about it. Some alliances might gain more than others from sheer coincidence, some tinfoil-hattery might ensue.

---

Originally by: CCP Greyscale

---

Originally by: Tzrailasa

---

The thing CCP should do is remove the Quality factor of agents, and just replace that with your standing towards the agent in LP/reward calculations. That way you could use any agent of the level you want, and people could spread out when your agent system was lagged....

---

All level 5 agents are Quality 12

---

Quote:

---

A "View Market Details" entry should be on entries in the Wallet transaction log and on entries in the "My Orders" tab in the market

---

Originally by: Tzrailasa

---

Originally by: CCP Greyscale

---

Originally by: Tzrailasa

---

The thing CCP should do is remove the Quality factor of agents, and just replace that with your standing towards the agent in LP/reward calculations. That way you could use any agent of the level you want, and people could spread out when your agent system was lagged....

---

All level 5 agents are Quality 12

---

That's nice for lvl 5's, but doesn't do anything about the lag in the Motsu area

Seriously though, it is something you should consider for all agents, since it'd spread people around, especially with the very nice change you made here making LP corp-wide...

---

Originally by: Elmicker

---

Edited by: Elmicker on 14/06/2007 23:14:44
Edited by: Elmicker on 14/06/2007 23:06:11
Edited by: Elmicker on 14/06/2007 23:01:35

Originally by: Tonto Auri

---

Rest in peace, it just boosting of large alliances and nerfing of small corps.
"No one will be able to compete BoB"

---

You are incorrect, young alt. This is in fact a nerf to all but 4 alliances, and even they will be severely hit by this, titans are command level ships. I suspect the general members will still use carriers for personal asset transport, now almost impossible due to the inability to use GSCs.

So now, in CCP's wisdom, instead of my corp's forums looking like:
"Transport request: 2x GSC named "elmicker""

It'll be
"Transport request:
435 corpses
14 425mm II Railguns
10k Spike L Ammo
25 10mn MWD IIs
14 Kitchen sinks..."

And so on. I feel sorry for the poor buggers who have to haul the crap out there, who will now be forced to unneccessarily sort through thousands of items. I thought the whole point of Revelations 2.0 was to encourage more intense warfare. How, might i ask, are we meant to do that when all our modules are sitting in empire, as our carrier pilots spend hours sorting through modules, ejecting from the carrier, boarding the ity 5, loading the ity 5, storing it in the carrier, boarding the viator, filling the viator, storing the viator, boarding the carrier, jumping, waiting for cap recharge, jumping again, then spending more hours re-sorting the items for distribution at the far end.

Of course, this could just be a method of pushing us to establish T2 infrastructures in 0.0, rather than relying on imports from empire. But, how exactly are we meant to do that, when every single industry improvement has been sidelined in favour of laughably useless bombs and massive mothership buffs?

Way to totally pay attention to the community's requests, CCP. Totally unneccessary, MASSIVE nerfs for the ******* lose.

(though, other than that, looks nifty )

---

Originally by: CCP Chronotis

---

Originally by: Mysticaa

---

Quote:

---

Tech 2 Ammo can now be invented

---

Does this include mining crystals?

---

no, mining crystals will come in 2.1.

---

Originally by: Tao Han

---

"TANK CEO!!!"
Quick Wrangler, to the Banmobile!!!

---

Quote:

---

Growing Interest in the field of Mechanical Engineering Research has lead to more agents within the Amarr, Caldari and Gallente factions beginning research into this highly demanded area alongside their current projects.

---

Originally by: Tao Han

---

"TANK CEO!!!"
Quick Wrangler, to the Banmobile!!!

---

Originally by: CCP Explorer

---

If you are running multiple clients then please follow the advice in the patch notes and use the "/end /LUA:OFF" switches. Note that then you need to run the EVE client with administrative privileges. There is also interesting advice here on how to maintain a setup for multiple accounts and multiple servers.

---

Originally by: Mysticaa

---

Quote:

---

Growing Interest in the field of Mechanical Engineering Research has lead to more agents within the Amarr, Caldari and Gallente factions beginning research into this highly demanded area alongside their current projects.

---

Oh man I almost missed that one. Thank you CCP!!!!

Gallente will now have Mechanical Engineering

---

Quote:

---

Amarr

Zasrike Poona
Tharva Zarvinis
Yonal Janonah
Jalshinden Sharemi
Bummiri Nadaneh

Caldari

Itirikko Innishi
Airatomon Kidurouchi
Vasti Sashobaira
Karnuras Ulalima
Poirmavas Isoya

Gallente

Auflaerdt Blala
Roomfennan Ambettin
Virrelina Exenaert
Charie Porelotta
Sitaleere Beene

---

Originally by: mr bighelmet

---

Originally by: Tzrailasa

---

Originally by: CCP Greyscale

---

Originally by: Tzrailasa

---

The thing CCP should do is remove the Quality factor of agents, and just replace that with your standing towards the agent in LP/reward calculations. That way you could use any agent of the level you want, and people could spread out when your agent system was lagged....

---

All level 5 agents are Quality 12

---

That's nice for lvl 5's, but doesn't do anything about the lag in the Motsu area

Seriously though, it is something you should consider for all agents, since it'd spread people around, especially with the very nice change you made here making LP corp-wide...

---

Sorry but why should i suffer becuse a bunch of idiots insist to play with heavy lag?
If what turn you own is playin gin mots even though it's a very high sec system with lots of lag then enjoy.

---

Originally by: Hoshi

---

Originally by: CCP Explorer

---

If you are running multiple clients then please follow the advice in the patch notes and use the "/end /LUA:OFF" switches. Note that then you need to run the EVE client with administrative privileges. There is also interesting advice here on how to maintain a setup for multiple accounts and multiple servers.

---

Personally I find these "work arounds" unacceptable. Specially since I can't use them as I use EVE Launcher. And no switching to EVEMon's window moving or similar is not an option as it does not support placing different copies of the client on different screens.

---

Originally by: Kythoma

---

hi,
just take a look on sisi into the new LP-storage system. is it true, that all your lp earned before are gone now and u need to startup by zero?????? i got the lp-store first after doing a mission (in this case top-down) and the store show ONLY 518 LP

this can't be TRUE

---

Originally by: Kythoma

---

hi,
just take a look on sisi into the new LP-storage system. is it true, that all your lp earned before are gone now and u need to startup by zero?????? i got the lp-store first after doing a mission (in this case top-down) and the store show ONLY 518 LP

this can't be TRUE

---

Originally by: WhitePhantom

---

Originally by: Kythoma

---

hi,
just take a look on sisi into the new LP-storage system. is it true, that all your lp earned before are gone now and u need to startup by zero?????? i got the lp-store first after doing a mission (in this case top-down) and the store show ONLY 518 LP

this can't be TRUE

---

This point was already brought up by somebody else in another thread, the response was that you would not lose your LP points.

---

Originally by: Brady

---

please, for the love of god someone think of the children.......

That to one side, CCP fantastic job here, but why only can only 5 in gang recive rewards for lp etc from agents?
Any idea of how the system will choose which lucky 5 are the winners?

---

Originally by: Brady

---

Guys while your reading can you respond to my comments regarding gangs of five people?
I apoligse for the nastiness contained, but squads hold 10, wings hold 50...why did you choose 5? and is this likely to be increased?
As it stands its silly.
How will the game know which 5 to choose if there are 10 in gang?

---

Quote:

---

Players start in their own protected dungeon out of harmÆs way
Tutorial dungeon can be accessed again within 30 days of account creation.
The dungeon can only be started in rookie systems

---

Originally by: Tonto Auri

---

Can't see ability to export wallet Journal on SiSi.
Is it missed or patchnotes said wrong things?

---

Originally by: CCP Garthagk

---

Wallet export will be available through the MyEVE site

---

Originally by: Sasakisan

---

In any case, Devs, have you planned for the exploits associated with shared rewards for grinding in groups? These usually involve high levels power-leveling lower levels by grouping with them and running missions. The low levels stay out of the fight and still receive mission rewards.

---

Originally by: Sasakisan

---

Speaking of instanced content, it looks like we are getting our first truly instanced content in EVE in this patch:

Quote:

---

Players start in their own protected dungeon out of harmÆs way
Tutorial dungeon can be accessed again within 30 days of account creation.
The dungeon can only be started in rookie systems

---

There are a lot of casual players who love instanced content, such as dungeons and battlegrounds. I'm guessing that a lot of new players will request more instances.

These requests and suggestions tend to start discussions about risk vs reward. Industrial toons that never undock from the station and specialize in market trading make tons of isks and are exposed to zero PVP combat risk and don't seem to ruin the game. Having made this point, I am sure that CCP designers could figure out how to put in even more instanced content, to keep the casual people happy, without ruining the game.

---

Originally by: Jilly Serkov

---

Did I miss something or does :-

"Shield Boost Amplifier increases heat damage from Shield boosters by 100%"

just make this module type a useless one-way trip to a dead shield tank ? It implies the shield boost amp. under normal operating conditions will overload the shield tank rack. Surely, this should only apply if the sheild boost amp is itself being overloaded ?

Clarification please.

---

Originally by: Tundaar

---

"Large structures have 100,000 shield, 1,500,000 armor and 5,000,000 structure (and 90% structure resistance given by the control tower), " - this include "all firepower, electronic warfare, and scanning arrays; cynosural field jammers and generators; and jump bridge towers"

This means that you will need to do in the region of 50 MILLION points damage to a single Cyno Jammer to kill it and enable a Cap fleet to come in - (I thought these were supposed to be tactical targets for non cap ships to give them a role in Sovereignty warfare?)

---

Originally by: CCP Greyscale

---

Originally by: Sasakisan

---

In any case, Devs, have you planned for the exploits associated with shared rewards for grinding in groups? These usually involve high levels power-leveling lower levels by grouping with them and running missions. The low levels stay out of the fight and still receive mission rewards.

---

This is considered gameplay functionality, not an exploit

---

Originally by: CCP Greyscale

---

These are not really "true" instances, and even if they were, this wouldn't signify a general shift in attitude towards instances

---

Originally by: CCP Garthagk

---

Originally by: Tonto Auri

---

Can't see ability to export wallet Journal on SiSi.
Is it missed or patchnotes said wrong things?

---

Website functionality is not available on the SiSi environment. Wallet export will be available through the MyEVE site, but only when Revelations II hits the proverbial shelf.

---

Quote:

---

General Improvements
Dozens of enhancements will be included with Revelations II, ranging from adding faction missiles to loot drops; the introduction of Tech II Sentry and Logistics drones; giving commanders the ability to transfer their gang-boosting role to another pilot; seeding the market with more gas cloud harvesters to encourage booster production; adding rogue drone commanders to exploration complexes; plus many more unique improvements to better the EVE experience for new and veteran players alike.

---

Originally by: CCP Chronotis

---

To save you looking around specifically, these agents have hired Mechanical Engineering research teams :)

Quote:

---

Amarr

Zasrike Poona
Tharva Zarvinis
Yonal Janonah
Jalshinden Sharemi
Bummiri Nadaneh

Caldari

Itirikko Innishi
Airatomon Kidurouchi
Vasti Sashobaira
Karnuras Ulalima
Poirmavas Isoya

Gallente

Auflaerdt Blala
Roomfennan Ambettin
Virrelina Exenaert
Charie Porelotta
Sitaleere Beene

---

---

Originally by: Tao Han

---

"TANK CEO!!!"
Quick Wrangler, to the Banmobile!!!

---

Originally by: Mikal Drey

---

hey hey

Nice patch note but a few thing made me cry :(

1) Fixed an issue with lab slots in mobile laboratories that had added restrictions to them would not be displayed in the installations tab.

Does this actually mean that mobile labs that have restrictions removed so that they can be made for public use will actually work now ?

---

Quote:

---

2) Drone invention.

Whilst superb I noticed that all drones use Gallente Encryption to invent. Wouldnt this be more inline with the story if each race could invent its own drones ? Galente3s making TII drones for the amarrian scum makes me wonder where their true allegiences lie.

---

Originally by: Sasakisan

---

In any case, Devs, have you planned for the exploits associated with shared rewards for grinding in groups? These usually involve high levels power-leveling lower levels by grouping with them and running missions. The low levels stay out of the fight and still receive mission rewards.

---

Originally by: Kythoma

---

hi,
just take a look on sisi into the new LP-storage system. is it true, that all your lp earned before are gone now and u need to startup by zero?????? i got the lp-store first after doing a mission (in this case top-down) and the store show ONLY 518 LP QuestionQuestionQuestionQuestion

this can't be TRUE QuestionQuestion

---

Originally by: Tohmu Blackwing

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Battlecruiser & Command Ship shield recharge rate changed to 1400 seconds.

---

Ah... yet another nerf to shield tanking. Again... why? I mean, really - you make these changes but you provide NO rationale behind them. If your going to make a change like this, wouldn't it make for good PR to tell us WHY you are making a change this drastic?

You must have a reason - and I hope it isn't simply to appease the complaints of gunboat PVPers who "cant break a tank" on a properly fitted Drake (and haven't bothered to adjust their tactics to fit new technology).

So... why?

---

The point is :

It does not matter for any BC/CS except the Drake.Armortanks do not need it anyway and the others do active tanking.

The shield tank of a drake is really good if corretly fitted, but if done so, the attack DPS sucks !
T2 Launcher? .. good joke.. ecm.. what?

I say you are right, the gank squads complained about not ganking a solo player that easy anymore and ccp changed it on the fly.

Isn't it enough advantage to simply fly away from fight with a drake because he can't fit a scrambler ?

Who ever changed anything against those Ganktrons!

How the heck can ONE ! BS gank other T2 BS so easily ?

Oh no, it's good for gankers which power the economy by killing ships ... isn't it?

Answeres please..