Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 39 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 24 post(s) |
Captain Sircle
TunDraGon
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:00:00 -
[1081] - Quote
This is NOT an improvement, bring back the old system. |
Titas Agor
TITANS OF PEACE
22
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:32:00 -
[1082] - Quote
edit: posted in wrong section |
Ricky Bolt
Space Bastards
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 22:24:00 -
[1083] - Quote
The new ally system, as discussed here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=110428&p=11, has quite strongly put wars in favor of the defender. The ability to field a number of pilots/ships waaaaaaay beyond anything the defender can support with only a one-time cost means defenders don't even need to fight! My corp declared war on a small alliance because one of the alliance members tried to steal our Orca (after we invited him to a mining op), and before we can start shooting there are 10 allies against us, with 7 more the next day.
There needs to be a way to discourage "ally-whoring," especially the lack of mandatory cost. If someone has 3 accounts with each account using 3 characters (bravo for managing 9 characters, first off), that means if 1 character is in a corp that gets war-decced, then 8 ally corps could, theoretically, be recruited for free!
Even if they're not free, if the only limit to your number of allies is how much they charge, you could still pay enough corps to join you that the original defender doesn't even need to fight! If a legit merc corp joins a war, they'll be out doing the hunting/camping while the corp who's hiring allies can safely gather more money to recruit more allies. Note: this is what's happened to my corp in our current war.
I wonder why implementing a weekly cost to have an ally, and (prefferably not /or) capping the number of allies you can have in a war (2 or 3 feels like a good number) could/should/would not happen to return PvP wars in EVE to a feasible activity?
So, CCP, intentional or not, the current merc system is bringing the biggest change to wars I've seen: it's stopping them. No corp in its right mind would want to be the aggressing side now, and I hardly think enough mutual wars happen/will happen to make-up for the decline in 1-sided decs. |
Gainard
Eurotech Industries
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 13:20:00 -
[1084] - Quote
Who ever made the new UI should at least have taken one look at the old system. When entering a station ship hangar and inventory and ship cargohold should be open, at least if they where open when leaving the station. This is a basic requirement for mission runners. Miner might want to skip the ship hangar, but then may wish to change to a hauler. How can you forget to let the UI to remember the last state of those windows?
Why did you fix the system in the first place? The old system was not broken and working perfectly for most players? If some people wanted modifications / improvements why not simply modify / improve the existing system?
Why on top of the clunkyness of the new UI does it take so much time to load? As a Miner I just want to unload my stuff and return to the astroid belt asap. As a mission runner i just want to modify my setup or change a new ship between missions, now it's shift clicking all the time to get what i need. During missions i want to setup my ship for a quick repair and then back to battle setup. This takes ages now. Make the price info optional!
MOST WHY of all, why did you IGNORE SISI FEED BACK? Do you want to **** us off after the last time you f***d up and after wich you promised to listen to us in the future? In what or whose future if I may dare ask?
Do not fix working things. Fix broken ones like the Invention system which takes a dozen or so clicks to start one. Then you cant even repeat for the next invention but have to start all over again. I am still sorry for the time I spend training for that - getting pissed off and turning away from invention took much less time than training for it.
If you insist on keeping the new UI (as you will no doubt do ) then: 1. Let the system remember in which state the windows where when you leave a station. Make them open again with the same size, location and setting when redocking. Would be nice if cargo hold stays open when jumping a gate too. Even better if this would not cause the items in the cargohold to reorganize - I like to keep my EMP L top left and the missiles below! 2. When opening the tree view it should expand out of the the window nit into it. This reduces the space inside the window. Some windows are kept small so they dont block to much space (especially when ouside the station) making the contents of the tree view unreadable and the contens of the window almost inacessible. So to keep the original size of the window the tree viw needs to expand out of the window as long as it has the focus and retrct automatically when loosing the focus. Enable us to further extend the tree view sideways (make it wider) so it is easy to read - which should also be remebered by each window that has a treeview. If the Window is on the left side the tree view should expand to the right of the window. This must not cause any window to move or resize! 3. Clicking anything in the tree view should open the item in a seperate window by default. An option of stacking the item with others should be available and too should be remembered. 4. If items open in the same window implement a BACK button (and maybe an "up one level" button) 5. Top and Bottom of the Window: Make each entry there optional and remeber for each single Window.
Enough for today. I want to play now - that is shift click
|
Lost True
Paradise project
27
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 13:36:00 -
[1085] - Quote
Why the cruise missiles on this ship are so weird? http://beta.xfire.com/videos/576aa2/ |
Krystyn
Serenity Rising LLC Vanguard.
56
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 13:48:00 -
[1086] - Quote
The new missile effects look good. Can I trade those back in for the old UI again? Pretty missiles effects(even for a Caldari missile spammer such as myself) doesn't even come close to the loss of functionality and plain annoyance at the new cumbersome and laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaggggggggggyyyyyyyy inventory.
Massive Net Negative on this patch so far. |
RudyGT
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 15:37:00 -
[1087] - Quote
open items shift click ships, close items.. FUUUUUUU seriously bring back the old item windows. this sucks bad. how about an option to not use this new item window. |
Alexia Killfist
The Wise Man's Force
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 15:39:00 -
[1088] - Quote
This feedback thread has one, resoundingly clear message -
THIS UI IS NOT AN IMPROVEMENT.
The player base has spoken clearly:
ROLL IT BACK or at the very least make the windows PERSISTENT so we are not wasting time clicking ridiculous inventory trees in multiple windows.
We await a clear response.
Recent patch notes: http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp |
Race Drones
13th Squadron Cascade Imminent
30
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 22:56:00 -
[1089] - Quote
This is NOT an improvement, bring back the old system. Keep it simple, Stupid! - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle
|
Peter Fajl
The Crabbit S O L A R I S
20
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 00:20:00 -
[1090] - Quote
This is NOT an improvement, bring back the old system. |
|
Leocadminone
Gem Concordance
40
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 02:11:00 -
[1091] - Quote
This piece of garbage they call an "improved" inventory system is the final straw.
I am NOT renewing any of my subs unless this piece of garbage is rolled back (most of them have lapsed already, this account is my last active one at this point).
It makes inventory management a BLOODY PAIN IN THE REAR, is a LOT slower due to having to do a LOT more clicking around to even SEE what you are managing, you CAN'T just "add stuff to existing stacks" which makes it INHERENTLY slower, and the current patch now makes you have to "sort by name" or some such to even SEE AT ALL what is in your cargo hold.
WHICH PART OF BROKEN BY DESIGN, MUCH LESS BROKEN IN IMPLIMENTATION, IS SO HARD FOR CCP TO UNDERSTAND?
So much for their lies about "listening to the playerbase" - CCP is STILL the same arrogant can't be bothered to LISTEN to complaints company it's shown itself to be for at least the last 3 years and all the garbage out of them about how they're going to change is just MORE lies.
|
Roddex
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 04:02:00 -
[1092] - Quote
I know defenders were only used by a small number of players but that doesn't make the stealth nerf of them a non-issue. If nothing else the entire community should be scared by the fact that CCP chose to make this change with no prior announcement or reasoning given, that it simply appeared on the patch notes. |
Ravock Seti
SETI Enterprises Nite's Reign
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 11:05:00 -
[1093] - Quote
Gainard wrote:Who ever made the new UI should at least have taken one look at the old system. When entering a station ship hangar and inventory and ship cargohold should be open, at least if they where open when leaving the station. This is a basic requirement for mission runners. Miner might want to skip the ship hangar, but then may wish to change to a hauler. How can you forget to let the UI to remember the last state of those windows? Why did you fix the system in the first place? The old system was not broken and working perfectly for most players? If some people wanted modifications / improvements why not simply modify / improve the existing system? Why on top of the clunkyness of the new UI does it take so much time to load? As a Miner I just want to unload my stuff and return to the astroid belt asap. As a mission runner i just want to modify my setup or change a new ship between missions, now it's shift clicking all the time to get what i need. During missions i want to setup my ship for a quick repair and then back to battle setup. This takes ages now. Make the price info optional! MOST WHY of all, why did you IGNORE SISI FEED BACK? Do you want to **** us off after the last time you f***d up and after wich you promised to listen to us in the future? In what or whose future if I may dare ask? Do not fix working things. Fix broken ones like the Invention system which takes a dozen or so clicks to start one. Then you cant even repeat for the next invention but have to start all over again. I am still sorry for the time I spend training for that - getting pissed off and turning away from invention took much less time than training for it. If you insist on keeping the new UI (as you will no doubt do ) then: 1. Let the system remember in which state the windows where when you leave a station. Make them open again with the same size, location and setting when redocking. Would be nice if cargo hold stays open when jumping a gate too. Even better if this would not cause the items in the cargohold to reorganize - I like to keep my EMP L top left and the missiles below! 2. When opening the tree view it should expand out of the the window not into it. This reduces the space inside the window. Some windows are kept small so they dont block to much space (especially when ouside the station) making the contents of the tree view unreadable and the contens of the window almost inacessible. So to keep the original size of the window the tree view needs to expand out of the window as long as it has the focus and retract automatically when loosing the focus. Enable us to further extend the tree view sideways (make it wider) so it is easy to read - which should also be remebered by each window that has a treeview. If the Window is on the left side the tree view should expand to the right of the window. This must not cause any window to move or resize! 3. Clicking anything in the tree view should open the item in a seperate window by default. An option of stacking the item with other windows (-> TABS) and one to open it in the same window should be available and too should be remembered. 4. If items open in the same window implement a BACK button (and maybe an "up one level" button). 5. Top and Bottom of the Window: Make each entry there optional and remeber for each single Window. 6. Make available a window to be used like the clip board in windows systems, where you can drop ships and items to drag them out to other windows (copy-paste like function). Enough for today. I want to play now - that is shift click The best post on this I have seen Yet. Good common sense and put the issues out in front. Not just complaining. Also EVE people should have had at least a little help file so ppl could figue out how to use the new UI. I am finding that most ppl don't know you can still open multiple windows like the old system. Once they learn that most of the complainers stop and move on. |
EarthZone
HomeZone
12
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 17:23:00 -
[1094] - Quote
Never change a running system. Want old inventory windows back. |
Amura Kadur
2
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:08:00 -
[1095] - Quote
The corporation hangar is part of the station. Why do I have to open the cargo hold of the ship to open the corporation hangar? It is logical, when you open your corporation hangar on the station services.
What was wrong with that if you clicked on open a floating cargo, that the content of the floating cargo in a new window opened? Why do I have to press an additional key to get the same result? What was wrong with that if you clicked the button corporation hangar that the corporation hangar opened? Why do I have to press many times an extra key and click to get the same result?
If you are planning that all windows operate on the principle of the inventory, I say goodbye. I will probably play WoW, the game is not great, but it is easy to use.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________ The new inventory would be fine if it would behave like the old inventory. All of my words are secondhand and useless in the face of this. |
Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
154
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:49:00 -
[1096] - Quote
... and the complaints about the "new and improved" UI continue to flood in ...
I thought I was reading old posts, but I see a large number of new posts about this issue, even after all of the tuning and performance tweaks. This does not bode well.
I've been spending more time on SiSi than I have in TQ trying to adapt and find ways to use the new UI efficiently. I have been unsuccessful.
The player consensus truly tells it all in plain generic language: laggy, inefficient, and frustrating.
At this point, the specifics are almost irrelevant because the UI fails in so many areas. But looks like we are stuck with it, that and the painful process of satisfying everyone's complaints based upon how CCP prioritizes the "to do list".
You can literally see the inefficient code when stacking items in a container : it fires hot triggers that activate the subroutines to display changes to cargohold-contents-volume as it handles the array processing needed to sort the list, i.e., stack all items. This could be a background process disconnected from GUI mechanics and hot triggers, which all take time to execute, thus slowing everything down badly. I guess I use this example, because during a sort/merge operaiton, the total volume in the cargohold remains unchanged, and yet, the system displays the cargohold volume changes incurred during the sort/merge operation. It is stupidly inefficient.
Anyway, it's a mess, and not getting better fast enough to satisfy most of the players. CCP already knows what's wrong. Specifics at this point are almost irrelevant. |
Leah Solo
State War Academy Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 21:41:00 -
[1097] - Quote
Sorry if this idea regarding Unified Inventory was requested already.
Can you devs please make it so we can drag and drop ships from the tree view, to make them active(like from the ships hangar)? |
Valkerias
Society of Friends
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.02 07:00:00 -
[1098] - Quote
I thought I'd give the UI system a try, and the more I try it the less I like it.
1.) Randomly closes PI "hangars" when transferring materials to/from planet.
2.) All the complaints listed above.
The only thing that makes ANY sense to me is that CCP is looking to REMOVE mining in the near future, to perhaps "Streamline resources" by not loading all the objects in asteroid belts any more.
Of course, they can't just suddenly remove all the belts in the game so instead they're making mining (and related activities) SO INSANELY INFURIATING that all the miners will just quit and then they can remove the belts and (hopefully) nobody will notice.
(Both the "improved" inventory system and the deployment during a major miner grief "operation" to make the odds of getting ganked even higher.)
What does this REALLY mean?
POS will go offline for lack of fuel, Nitrogen is already impossible to BUY in Empire.
Goodbye players researching/copying/ inventing on their Blueprints without waiting MONTHS in a que.
Goodbye players actually building ships/modules/etc because no one will be able to get the much needed minerals to do so, unless Industrial players are really lucky at reprocessing LOOT.
Goodbye Exploration and Wormholes because nobody will bother/be able to build probes any more.
Eventually, it will just be players flying around shooting at each other in rookie ships and using on board scanners to try and find anomalies. "Improves" everything doesn't IT?
The massive Patch list in the latest patch should be a red flag to everybody. Wonder what else got broke in the fix.
Helpful HINT, CCP. When your TEST PLAYERS, who ARE IN NO WAY COMPENSATED FOR THEIR TIME, tell you something, LISTEN. Don't just "damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead." You WILL regret it. |
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Villore Accords
157
|
Posted - 2012.06.02 09:25:00 -
[1099] - Quote
I moved a bunch of ships out of a system the other day on my alts jump freighter. I repackaged 20 ships and their fittings.
My computer is;
i7 3820 @ 4.6Ghz Asus Rampage Formula 4 16Gb 2.13Ghz DDR3 Quad Channel 2x AMD 6970HD's
The process of repackaging the fittings dropped my alts client to 5 fps over the 30-40 seconds it took to complete the task. Thats pretty hideous.
Also, a video i made after dt yesterday with some feedback on the current often unworkable state of the unified inventory;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwkqcVkmKpg
0:00 in station - ships cargo window win, but general containers incoherent behaviour 2:40 in space - ships cargo window and looting fail 5:55 in station - drone bay fail.
Wasnt scripted so sorry for rambling but i hope you can see how basic functionality is unintuitive, frustrating and down right broken in some cases. |
Slipnut
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2012.06.02 09:49:00 -
[1100] - Quote
Not sure this has been mentioned.
Stack All function in Station Container no longer works. |
|
Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
154
|
Posted - 2012.06.02 12:41:00 -
[1101] - Quote
Sorry if this is a double post, but I quoted Crosi previously and my post seems to be vaporized ...
CCP :: make a tutorial vid showing how you intended us to use the new UI.
Either we are so stupid that we can't figure out how to use it, or it is a piece of junk that cannot be used efficiently no matter how much we try. |
Gainard
Eurotech Industries
12
|
Posted - 2012.06.02 15:21:00 -
[1102] - Quote
Urgg Boolean wrote:Sorry if this is a double post, but I quoted Crosi previously and my post seems to be vaporized ... CCP :: make a tutorial vid showing how you intended us to use the new UI. Either we are so stupid that we can't figure out how to use it, or it is a piece of junk that cannot be used efficiently no matter how much we try.
Yes! Show us the tutorial since we are all only whining and just don't know how to use your great improved UI! |
Enzaki
Phantom Squad Nulli Secunda
3
|
Posted - 2012.06.02 16:35:00 -
[1103] - Quote
When will there be an option to use the old inventory system rather the the new Unified Inventory ?? |
Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
2413
|
Posted - 2012.06.02 16:36:00 -
[1104] - Quote
I've got to say, that I'm not a fan of the new missiles. The reason being, that I can't see them anymore. The effects are there, but at least the kinetic heavy missiles are hard to see at all. I would like to see some kind of light come from the missiles. Engine flare/trails or something, that allows you to see where your missiles are and hostile incoming missiles. I don't want to have to stare at the screen and try to spot the squigly, vague gray mist trails. |
Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
154
|
Posted - 2012.06.02 20:31:00 -
[1105] - Quote
I hate to post again so soon, but the UI seems to be going backward:
1) My in-station windows do not remember their locations and open in a default state. They revert to the default state every time you disembark from the station, and must be configured again upon entering the station. This definitely worked (for me) prior to the Friday patch.
2) Sort-merge / transfer / trading lag is once again HORRIBLE after what seemed like very positive improvements. It is semi-random from a completely frozen screen, to a drop in FPS down to somewhere near 5, to a series of quick freeze-ups of three or four pulses. This is way worse than prior to the patch. Trading is the worst as you incur lag during the initial xfer to the trade window, again upon xfer from trade window to items hangar, and yet again when you xfer from items to final destination.
And I have read that there have been more bugs introduced with the Friday patch.
I'm trying to reconcile your words:
CCP Soundwave wrote:I'd just like to confirm that "winferno" is indeed going to be awesome. with your actions that are manifest in the ongoing and seemingly retrograde patching process.
There are irreconcilable differences.
For the love of God, you guys, the time has come to get this right. |
Jared Tobin
Bloodstone Industries B.S.I.
51
|
Posted - 2012.06.03 10:14:00 -
[1106] - Quote
I have been patient, but I literally dread logging in... especially since my 2-part post 1 week ago.
BUT FIRST, BUG REPORT 137632:
I see a container in a corp hangar. I try to "SHIFT+'DOUBLE-CLICK'" to open container. The client freezes for 1-2 seconds. Then it "unfreezes". Container did NOT open at all.
[SEE: screenshot of my horribly CROWDED "individual windows" I NEED open in order to do my JOB as CEO of a heavy manufacturing/marketing corporation. I had to find in "tree" list and "Open in new window" each one!]
So, in the spirit of constructive feedback, let's quickly revisit my original list of issues of Unified Inventory UI, giving each an updated status, and see what's actually been changed/fixed/additionally-discovered in the 2 weeks since:
- It now takes up to 22 seconds (instead of 50) to RELOAD the corporate hangar "tree list" every time one logs in or redocks.
- WINDOW AMNESIA:**It's still only HALF remembering where windows are/were.
- IF YOU DOUBLE-CLICK a container you wish to open, PLEASE MAKE IT AUTOMATICALLY FORCE OPEN in a NEW window. **No one addressed this, but it is important, ESPECIALLY since the majority of us players are so conditioned to double click containers to open in a new window before - OR - add an "Open container in new window" option to the RIGHT-CLICK menu for ALL CONTAINERS IN HANGAR LISTINGS. (Gee, this would be really helpful now since I cannot open any containers easily right now.)
- MORE TIME CONSUMING FOR MASSIVE INDUSTRIALISTS: Enough said? ... **Apparently it WAS NOT "enough said" since now I click more times than ever... especially now as I cannot open any containers "neo-traditionally". If this UI remains, then you really should restore corp hangars with tabs as a separate entity. MAKE THIS AN OPTION: IT'S NOT FOR EVERYONE
- MASSIVE TIME CONSUMPTION AND LAG WHEN MOVING/TRADING:**This is STILL killing me. A big trade, a large movement of items, or even "delivering" 22+ science lab jobs that are done: They can take up to 2 minutes of lagging per "stack" of each item.
- FAILURE IN MOVING "ALL-SELECTED" ITEMS FROM CARGOHOLD TO PERSONAL/CORP HANGAR:**It seems to "sometimes work"... and "sometimes not work". Also takes a LONG time to move more that 30+ items... again, up to 2 minutes.
- TOO LONG, COMPLEX NAMES MAKE "TABS" FAIL:**Sadly, this is still UNCHANGED. The basic example: Take two container windows and merge them. Result: One tab is LABELLED: "Corporation hangars > PRODUCTION BAY > GAS STORAGE". The other tab is LABELLED: " Corporation hangars > PRODUCTION BAY > WORMHOLE SALVAGE". WHEN MERGED AS A 2-TABBED WINDOW: Sadly all I see are two tabs that say "Corporation han" next to the other tab that also says "Corporation han"... Shorten the tab names to just the NAME of the container/hangar.
- "POP UP" INFORMATION IS UNNECESSARY AND BLOCKING MY VIEW:**This is SO annoying and unchanged. when I'm hovering my pointer over an item in my hangar, it sometimes is because I'm comparing the quantities of it to another item a few lines above it. SADLY I CANNOT "SEE" anything in those spots (whether name or quantity, etc) being covered by by "estimated prices for both unit price and stack price... in the "compact line-by-line listing mode" (which I use because, well, as you may have seen, my screen has a lot of stuff to look at all at once), this is literally making my tasks more of a pain.
- PLEASE STOP ISK-CALCULATING VALUES:**Not addressed: It's really frustrating. Personally, with price estimation and such, that's one of my corporate jobs technically, and I suspect it is taking up calculating time referencing something within the region's market: I wonder if that is part of the extra "LAG" with everything - and every move - I perform with items of value. I WILL AGREE, THOUGH: For some people, especially non-industrialists and new players, this may be helpful for those players (though honestly, your price estimations are 50% terribly wrong). MAKE IT AN OPTION: IT'S NOT FOR EVERYONE
- WHAT HAPPENED TO THE LINES FOR ROWS?**Never addressed. Column separation lines are very visible. ROW separation lines are 10% visible.
- CREATE A BACK BUTTON:**Unadressed. HIGHLY needed.
- REINSTATE DOUBLE-CLICKING YOUR CURRENT SHIP TO FORCE OPEN A NEW CARGOHOLD WINDOW:**FIXED...somewhat. Thank you. somewhat. (2 issues fixed out of 14+ major issues...is a start.... I suppose.)
- SHIP HANGARS (...list THE SHIP WE ARE CURRENTLY IN): **FIXED! Thank you.
NEW ISSUES:
THE LAG IS KILLING ME (This may not sound like a lot, but when you do this often, it adds up): -Trading 10 items (qty of 100,000 ammo as the example for the following) takes about 10 to 16 seconds. -Moving 10 items from one container/hangar to another takes 18-24 seconds. (is this because "Est. value" is being updated per item moved?) -Delivering those 10 lab slot jobs into a designated Corp hangar took 28 seconds! -"Stack All" option, depending on items, can take from 12 seconds to 2 whole minutes! -WHEN UNDOCKING, it takes about 10 seconds to clear away all open container windows from the screen before loading up space... then overview.. then station.. then ship... then planets... in that order, each about 1-4 seconds each. -CHANGING WALLET DIVISIONS!!! Yes, changing from Master wallet to another Corp Wallet Division takes EXACTLY 7 seconds... with every change in "Active" wallet. Is that necessary/acceptable?
Come on CCP. I'm really trying... Are you? |
lunafaerie
The Lost Minmatar Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 11:29:00 -
[1107] - Quote
Hi all Just wondering if anyone else is experiencing this problem? Got a war dec running and seems to us that the people we are fighting like to use nuetral Guardian pilots now as far as i was aware this action should lead to said nuetrals becoming red/flagged...well they arent and when aggression is started on said nuets we are getting the concord warning. Anyone else had this and is it a known issue? |
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Villore Accords
158
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 14:33:00 -
[1108] - Quote
Another patch comes and goes with very little movement in the direction of returning the simple, effective and intuitive container/cargo-bay functionality we were all used to. This, along with introducing consequences to faction war (though the consequences are purely based on pve activities rather than pvp and have resulted in gallente for example winning just about every battle but losing the war), means i will be reducing the amount of time i spend playing eve since i have no confidence in the direction it is going.
Beyond my current subscription im not sure if i will subscribe again. Might as well jump ship before you guys make more horrifically ignorant design decisions that fly in the face of just about all player feedback while failing to fix the core aspects that are actually weak or broken concepts like orbiting buttons. |
DazedOne
The Crabbit S O L A R I S
48
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 14:36:00 -
[1109] - Quote
They still are not fixing what we wanted fixed. I hope for your sake CCP the new subs you get can make up for what your losing. |
Ad'Hakim Tahous
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
167
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 16:50:00 -
[1110] - Quote
We are not here to be CCP beta testers. Even with patches this system is an impediment to game play.
Enough
Roll it back. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 39 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |