| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [30] .. 32 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Ieldan
THE LIGHT BRIGADE
0
   |
Posted - 2012.08.24 02:40:00 -
[871] - Quote
Yeah guys, she lives in low sec so she knows things... She played for 2 hours and out of them 2 hours a gate was camped in low sec for 1hour and 40mins. So if thats the case for her it must mean at least 64% of low sec gates are camped......
Seriously just cos your a CSM it doesn't mean anything,
There is only a small amount of low sec gates that are camped and i can pretty safely say they will all be the exits to high sec / coming into low sec. once passed these gates its very very very rare to hit a gate camp unless there actively chasing someone down. |
Tyraeil Starblade
Ronin Wing
19
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 03:05:00 -
[872] - Quote
drunk asfck wrote:Tyraeil Starblade wrote:They still need to do something about low sec pirates who just sit on gate with smartbombs and blow up shuttles and pods and poorly fit frigates that land on gate. It's probably the lamest way to get kills. I think having tougher sentry guns that force you off the gate isn't such a bad thing...
Fight at celestials instead. Why? Gate camps have been around in lo-sec for ever but now eve is sooo dumbed down and full whineing pansys they want ccp to change things to suit them rember the old days were you actualy learnt from trying and not from crying can camp 0.0 choke points entry point can camp empire hubs and choke points omfg theres a camp in lo-sec we must nurf these pesky piwates carbares have all the tools needed to make life in lo-sec if they use they fcking heads jf's / covops / covop haulers / recons / t3's there are thousends of players and hundreds corps that this will efect in a negative way the players/corps that actualy put time effort into liveing in lo-sec and not handed to them on plate
Camping is for PvPrs who cant PvP. Period. Unless it's part of some larger strategy for locking down a system in a war or other strategic goals, it's pretty useless. And if it were undone, I'm sure the unsubs from all the mad pirates would barely be felt, if at all.
In other words, it makes sense. |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
548
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 03:06:00 -
[873] - Quote
What ever the number of gate camps the fact is that they detract from the usefulness of Lo-sec.
As to Usefulness it really does need a purpose other than Gate camping and FW.
The biggest question is 'Why do people want to go there?". All I can think of ATM is to get back out somewhere else.
Lo-sec needs changing, will the gate gun fix make it more useful? No idea but at least it is a change, if people allowed small changes like that one where a frig is actually useful but no ship can sit at the gate forever then maybe lo-sec might evolve into something.
At the moment lo-sec reminds me of primordial sludge, so much promise but at the moment it is just sludge.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
drunk asfck
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 03:13:00 -
[874] - Quote
But its not just about camping ive lived in losec for over three years and close on every fight be it solo or in gang hapens at the gate there is rare ocasion you catch a fck wit in plex/ belt but they are ganks but nerly ALL fights will hapen at a gate
Why do i av a feeling this Get a bear into losec fix has somthing to do with Dust and trying to get as many losec planets occupyed hmm
also could fck wits who have no clue or never been to losec please dont post you just look like idiots commenting on somthing u av no clue and that goes for csm also |
Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS
IDLE EMPIRE
185
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 03:13:00 -
[875] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:I live in low sec so I definitely know what I'm talking about. Last night there was a camp on at least one of the gates ot the three systems I was running trade through for about 90% of the two hours I was on.
Our corp used to operate in a high sec bubble in the middle of low sec and because the major routes in and out were constantly camped we moved almost all our activity out.
Maybe you need to spend more time in low sec.
Issler
I live in a highsec bubble that can only be reached by going through some lowsec is pretty far off of I live in lowsec.
although I would see why you would want better guns, farm like hell in your private pocket, and have safe transport out. I see what you did there.
|
drunk asfck
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 03:48:00 -
[876] - Quote
[/quote]
I live in low sec so I definitely know what I'm talking about. Last night there was a camp on at least one of the gates ot the three systems I was running trade through for about 90% of the two hours I was on.
Our corp used to operate in a high sec bubble in the middle of low sec and because the major routes in and out were constantly camped we moved almost all our activity out.
Maybe you need to spend more time in low sec.
That is not liveing in losec omfg you realy have no clue do you with idiots like this in csm we are doomed |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
548
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 03:53:00 -
[877] - Quote
I live in low sec so I definitely know what I'm talking about. Last night there was a camp on at least one of the gates ot the three systems I was running trade through for about 90% of the two hours I was on.
Our corp used to operate in a high sec bubble in the middle of low sec and because the major routes in and out were constantly camped we moved almost all our activity out.
Maybe you need to spend more time in low sec.
That is not liveing in losec omfg you realy have no clue do you with idiots like this in csm we are doomed[/quote]
I have lived in lo-sec and came to the inescapable conclusion, Why bother.
The only reasons to be living there are you are either FW or inept at PvP and want to kill noobs and carebears who wander in.
Oh what a joy Lo-sec is right now
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
drunk asfck
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 04:07:00 -
[878] - Quote
Lol was quoteing issler
on my phone working nights it messed up the quote lol |
Abel Merkabah
The Executioners
Capital Punishment.
107
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 04:17:00 -
[879] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:I live in low sec so I definitely know what I'm talking about. Last night there was a camp on at least one of the gates ot the three systems I was running trade through for about 90% of the two hours I was on. Our corp used to operate in a high sec bubble in the middle of low sec and because the major routes in and out were constantly camped we moved almost all our activity out. Maybe you need to spend more time in low sec. That is not liveing in losec omfg you realy have no clue do you with idiots like this in csm we are doomed
I have lived in lo-sec and came to the inescapable conclusion, Why bother.
The only reasons to be living there are you are either FW or inept at PvP and want to kill noobs and carebears who wander in.
Oh what a joy Lo-sec is right now[/quote]
Well you could also live there because you like the concept of pirating (like me). I don't claim to be a great PVPer, but I'm also not a chickenshit carebear...I want to fight and think war decs are lame. I like flying through space knowing every non blue in system is a threat. To me that is reason to live there. You are right though, if that is not what you are looking for, there probably is no reason to be in lowsec (excluding FW).
As for gate guns, every fight I've been part of has been at a gate, whether roaming or camping; excluding mission ganks; so what do you want, less camp on gates, willing to trade for more ganks?
"The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds, given adequate vacuuming systems." |
Mikaila Penshar
Take it Deep
5
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 04:24:00 -
[880] - Quote
k, so i was watching this nature show and all the action was happening at the watering hole, weird right? It was this place where every animal had to go eventually, so the hunters were looking for a kill there... i dunno if that means anything, but I thought i'd share that....
Oh, and another thing...
Gatecamps r fun, social things and eventually some actual numbers show up and there is a real fight happening- is this a bad thing? I mean really, what could be more boring than shooting rocks? I think they made that game back in the 70's ... they called it ASTEROIDS |
|
|
Tor Gungnir
Agenda Industries
390
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 05:55:00 -
[881] - Quote
I'm gonna need an Orca to fit all these gatecamper tears.
Space. It seems to go on and on forever. But then you get to the end and a gorilla starts throwing barrels at you. |
Mag's
the united
Negative Ten.
10086
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 07:47:00 -
[882] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:I live in low sec so I definitely know what I'm talking about. Last night there was a camp on at least one of the gates ot the three systems I was running trade through for about 90% of the two hours I was on.
Our corp used to operate in a high sec bubble in the middle of low sec and because the major routes in and out were constantly camped we moved almost all our activity out.
Maybe you need to spend more time in low sec.
Issler Every post you make, only confirms just how clueless you are.
CCP Zulu.....
Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |
Aruken Marr
BSC LEGION
Tactical Narcotics Team
302
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 09:47:00 -
[883] - Quote
I used to live in a hisec island aswell Issler (solitude) I spent a lot of time plexing in the losec around and I didnt run into these lowsec permacamps(!!!!!). Maybe pirates have clocked onto what you and your band of merry idiots do in said island and are specifically camping you in?
Basically Issler youre starting to sound delusional let alone clueless.
Granted lowsec is in dia need of change I dont think taking a massive dump over lowsec pvp is what it needs. |
Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
129
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 09:51:00 -
[884] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:I live in low sec so I definitely know what I'm talking about. Last night there was a camp on at least one of the gates ot the three systems I was running trade through for about 90% of the two hours I was on.
Our corp used to operate in a high sec bubble in the middle of low sec and because the major routes in and out were constantly camped we moved almost all our activity out.
Maybe you need to spend more time in low sec.
Issler
Ever think thats because you were in a high sec pocket with consistent through traffic, stop claiming your experience applies to everyone else unconditionally and try looking at lowsec as a whole, you know like the rest of us are doing. |
Malphilos
State War Academy
Caldari State
142
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 13:08:00 -
[885] - Quote
Darek Castigatus wrote:Ever think thats because you were in a high sec pocket with consistent through traffic,...
And of course most people are where traffic isn't.
|
alittlebirdy
All Hail The Liopleurodon
57
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 13:31:00 -
[886] - Quote
CCP really either wants people AFK mining in HS with no threat or in null... lowsec is nothing but a path from low to null...
I would say CCP could not come up with a worse idea but... I thought the new UI was the case... as always CCP is showing us they do not play this game or even understand it.
Ya see guys eve is dying... the eve we knew is dying... the new wow eve is coming. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1287
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 13:35:00 -
[887] - Quote
alittlebirdy wrote:CCP really either wants people AFK mining in HS with no threat or in null... lowsec is nothing but a path from low to null...
I would say CCP could not come up with a worse idea but... I thought the new UI was the case... as always CCP is showing us they do not play this game or even understand it.
Ya see guys eve is dying... the eve we knew is dying... the new wow eve is coming.
Don't be so pessimistic, go mine for a few hours. You'll feel better afterwards.
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd
Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 15:21:00 -
[888] - Quote
Ok so after running around in Low from Jita to Hek (Yes I survived without a podding much less a ship loss), there was a wonderful emptiness to the area.
One gate camp of obviousness (They really need to learn to space out to catch out bounds.)
And the rest of space had 14 people.
So uh yeah the issue is just getting through the hi-lowsec gates after which it just kinda goes phtt.
Also why wont you people let your poses run out of fuel!
I want to steal all your goodies so I dont have to earn them!
By doing industry!
Anyways lowsec needs a bigger draw the reduction in gate camping(ha hello 180km tornado of frigate ganking) will just simply mean there is now a possibility a tanked indie will escape instead of just getting shredded.
Which is nice.
If the idea is to reduce camping such that the victim has a realistic chance of escape I say it is good.
If it just turns camps into instalock alpha fests of nuclones then I say it is still broken.
(Seriously doubling the jump sphere randomization will solve a lot of the complaints!) |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
2796
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 15:46:00 -
[889] - Quote
alittlebirdy wrote: Ya see guys eve is dying... the eve we knew is dying... the new wow eve is coming.
Can I haz your stuff? 
Vice Secretary of the 7th Council of Stellar Management.
|
drunk asfck
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 16:10:00 -
[890] - Quote
alittlebirdy wrote:CCP really either wants people AFK mining in HS with no threat or in null... lowsec is nothing but a path from low to null...
I would say CCP could not come up with a worse idea but... I thought the new UI was the case... as always CCP is showing us they do not play this game or even understand it.
Ya see guys eve is dying... the eve we knew is dying... the new wow eve is coming.
youve got that the wrong way around m8
most of the pirates iv flown with in my 3-4 years in lo-sec like me LEFT 0.0 afta a number of years there becouse 0.0 is full egotistic fck wits that think they are ubber and orbit anchor point and press f1, and god forbit you enter they sanctuim or belt then they cry harder than a emp miner getting ganked
also why go 0.0 to fight for some allaince leader to get a tech moon
when i can farm fck wits at a gate in lo-sec get lucky drop go kill **** for week
so you see m8 to alot us lo-sec is our preferd home were we can do wtf we like when we like no CTA's no alarm clock ops no bubbles just our own fun
EDIT: i honestly belive this sentry gun buff has nothing to do with lo-sec pirate gate camps but more to do with opening lo-sec to carbare types to fill the lo-sec planets for Dusty's to fight over |
|
|
alittlebirdy
All Hail The Liopleurodon
59
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 17:14:00 -
[891] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:alittlebirdy wrote: Ya see guys eve is dying... the eve we knew is dying... the new wow eve is coming. Can I haz your stuff?
O look it's one of the retards that let this idea get even mentioned... Don't you have some CCP puppet things to do?
Then again your nothing but a useless noob to this game compared to myself. Nice kills bro your lowsec kills are what 40vs1? Yep keep talking about gate guns like you know anything.
as for the guy who can't type for ****.
I live in low... this does nothing but hurt low dum dum... ceptors can now lock anything with out being killed... allow a more tanked ship to take over tackle while it warps off (alive)... carebears ganked... guys warp to 250 aling to gate.. waiting out aggro... swap in a new tackle ceptor with out GCC... keep camp going. This does nothing but get LESS people in low... and stop any and all good gate fights...
All this does is *stop* gang fights on gates, EPICLY help gate campers looking for 1 person ganks... and fucks everyone who wants a GF. |
Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
130
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 22:41:00 -
[892] - Quote
Malphilos wrote:Darek Castigatus wrote:Ever think thats because you were in a high sec pocket with consistent through traffic,... And of course most people are where traffic isn't.
Nicwe quote mine there, perhaps if you read the rest of what i wrote you'd realise i went on to say that you cant apply conclusions drawn from one area to the whole. I'll spell it out for you just on the off chance you arent trolling and are genuinely this thick. Issler is actually trying to imply that because a lowsec area with features unlike most of the rest of lowsec had a 90 minute camp on it that camping is common place, we all know that for the bullshit it is. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1287
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 23:01:00 -
[893] - Quote
Darek Castigatus wrote: I'll spell it out for you just on the off chance you arent trolling and are genuinely this thick. Issler is actually trying to imply that because a lowsec area with features unlike most of the rest of lowsec had a 90 minute camp on it that camping is common place, we all know that for the bullshit it is.
So is Issler trolling or genuinely that thick, in your opinion?
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd
Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
130
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 23:19:00 -
[894] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Darek Castigatus wrote: I'll spell it out for you just on the off chance you arent trolling and are genuinely this thick. Issler is actually trying to imply that because a lowsec area with features unlike most of the rest of lowsec had a 90 minute camp on it that camping is common place, we all know that for the bullshit it is. So is Issler trolling or genuinely that thick, in your opinion?
Honestly I dont know, Im actually hoping for the first because if its the second then its kinda depressing someone that dumb could get on the CSM in the first place. |
Minmatar Citizen160812
The LGBT Last Supper
34
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 01:21:00 -
[895] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Well, depends on the care bear. For example if they can get into low sec they can consider trade at stations, explore the belts, search for anomolies or even consider missions that require low sec. Don't get me wrong, this alone is not the "get the bear into low sec fix" but reducing gate camps will have to part of the solution once other carrots are put into low sec to make risk/reward make sense in this under utilized portion of space.
And to be fair I should have reworded my post. What I was really reacting to was that this issue is not "clear support against and none for", there was support for variations of the idea with players as well as those against. Not acknowledging that some folks liked the idea in general (including a few CSM) was what prompted me to post.
I don't think gate gun changes are as dead as some may have suggested. Also, the real discussion should be broader about how to improve low sec for everyone.
Issler You are clueless. Gate camps are not prolific. I hop into and out of lowsec many many many times per week and rarely encounter gate camps. Rancer and Amamake are not indicative of all lowsec/highsec border systems. If you think that, then you're a damned fool. You might want to start travelling into lowsec, Issler, before spouting off your nonsense. I live in low sec so I definitely know what I'm talking about. Last night there was a camp on at least one of the gates ot the three systems I was running trade through for about 90% of the two hours I was on. Our corp used to operate in a high sec bubble in the middle of low sec and because the major routes in and out were constantly camped we moved almost all our activity out. Maybe you need to spend more time in low sec. Issler
Wait a minute....you live in low sec, got enough people to vote for you to win a trip to Iceland and you can't bust a gate camp....
You DON'T know what you're talking about. Who cares about the 2 hours you had to play. In that time if you can't avoid or destroy a static camp with a batphone alone you should be impeached as a representative of EVE players. If you're talking about Titans bombing gates then you really don't know what you're talking about because that only happens in a couple places which are easy to avoid.
Good luck on the next contest to win a vacation with these quotes floating around....friggen clueless trader looking to be can clouded and inty ganked....what a maroon. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1287
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 01:24:00 -
[896] - Quote
Darek Castigatus wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Darek Castigatus wrote: I'll spell it out for you just on the off chance you arent trolling and are genuinely this thick. Issler is actually trying to imply that because a lowsec area with features unlike most of the rest of lowsec had a 90 minute camp on it that camping is common place, we all know that for the bullshit it is. So is Issler trolling or genuinely that thick, in your opinion? Honestly I dont know, Im actually hoping for the first because if its the second then its kinda depressing someone that dumb could get on the CSM in the first place.
Hm, so (to you) it's better if the CSM person is trolling you.
Interesting.
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd
Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
130
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 09:26:00 -
[897] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Darek Castigatus wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Darek Castigatus wrote: I'll spell it out for you just on the off chance you arent trolling and are genuinely this thick. Issler is actually trying to imply that because a lowsec area with features unlike most of the rest of lowsec had a 90 minute camp on it that camping is common place, we all know that for the bullshit it is. So is Issler trolling or genuinely that thick, in your opinion? Honestly I dont know, Im actually hoping for the first because if its the second then its kinda depressing someone that dumb could get on the CSM in the first place. Hm, so (to you) it's better if the CSM person is trolling you. Interesting.
If the alternative is an idea that completely destroys my playstyle then yes I would. What i would really like is for them to actually be aware of and educated on issues in an area before they start commenting on it, something Issler has demonstrated an utter lack of ability in despite claiming to live in the area concerned. |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
556
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 10:24:00 -
[898] - Quote
Darek Castigatus wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Darek Castigatus wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Darek Castigatus wrote: I'll spell it out for you just on the off chance you arent trolling and are genuinely this thick. Issler is actually trying to imply that because a lowsec area with features unlike most of the rest of lowsec had a 90 minute camp on it that camping is common place, we all know that for the bullshit it is. So is Issler trolling or genuinely that thick, in your opinion? Honestly I dont know, Im actually hoping for the first because if its the second then its kinda depressing someone that dumb could get on the CSM in the first place. Hm, so (to you) it's better if the CSM person is trolling you. Interesting. If the alternative is an idea that completely destroys my playstyle then yes I would. What i would really like is for them to actually be aware of and educated on issues in an area before they start commenting on it, something Issler has demonstrated an utter lack of ability in despite claiming to live in the area concerned.
Well if you feel that strongly...Run next year for the CSM.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
drunk asfck
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 10:35:00 -
[899] - Quote
It be great to get a true pirate onto CSM as long they look afta lo-sec intrests they have my vote and im sure most other lo-sec dwellers votes
becouse atm from isslers veiws and post this dude is utterly clueless in lo-sec matters oh and i forgot he/she lived on hi-sec island that had to pass through lo-sec so he/she must know what they talking about
but good idea lets get a pirate into CSM |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
556
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 10:43:00 -
[900] - Quote
drunk asfck wrote:It be great to get a true pirate onto CSM as long they look afta lo-sec intrests they have my vote and im sure most other lo-sec dwellers votes
becouse atm from isslers veiws and post this dude is utterly clueless in lo-sec matters oh and i forgot he/she lived on hi-sec island that had to pass through lo-sec so he/she must know what they talking about
but good idea lets get a pirate into CSM
The fact that you are getting responses from a CSM is a good thing as it means they are communicating.
The fact they are not telling you what you want to hear is not surprising, they don't have a paid staff to tell them what to say like normal politicians and they do not play the same way you do.
Frankly the fact they are responding is great, no matter what they say but if you disagree run for the CSM or back someone or as pirates threaten some noobs to vote for your candidate. 
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [30] .. 32 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |