| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Pipa Porto
1104
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 17:14:00 -
[31] - Quote
Kestutis Fujika wrote:Show me any kills were t3 got killed with 2 destroyers in high sec. If u put tank before balance you lose all yield bonuses , but all other ships can balance dmg ewar and tank modules and Hulks , macs and other couldn't it was tank or yield. Hulk should be on pair with BC (power grid, cpu , number of slots and so on) . Yes they or not meant for battle , but that doesn't mean they have to be paper thin.
Why in the world should the Hulk be on par with a BC? Cause you don't feel like having to make choices?
There are 3 things that matter to a mining ship. Tank, Yield, and Cargo. If you keep insisting that a mining ship is worthless without max Yield, you'll keep getting ganked.* Everyone else has to make fitting choices between elements that matter to their ship, why shouldn't Miners have to?
*No longer true, since CCP codified in game mechanics the fact that miners are too stupid to protect themselves. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Kestutis Fujika
Critical Mass ltd.
3
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 17:43:00 -
[32] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Kestutis Fujika wrote:Show me any kills were t3 got killed with 2 destroyers in high sec. If u put tank before balance you lose all yield bonuses , but all other ships can balance dmg ewar and tank modules and Hulks , macs and other couldn't it was tank or yield. Hulk should be on pair with BC (power grid, cpu , number of slots and so on) . Yes they or not meant for battle , but that doesn't mean they have to be paper thin. Why in the world should the Hulk be on par with a BC? Cause you don't feel like having to make choices? There are 3 things that matter to a mining ship. Tank, Yield, and Cargo. If you keep insisting that a mining ship is worthless without max Yield, you'll keep getting ganked.* Everyone else has to make fitting choices between elements that matter to their ship, why shouldn't Miners have to? *No longer true, since CCP codified in game mechanics the fact that miners are too stupid to protect themselves. But what about efficiency ? Miners are no different from pvper or pvers everyone has its goals. Be its isk/h or killmails, but everyone should be on even grounds.Before update it was hardly possible .Miners had sacrifice there efficiency for tank while other activities of eve could more or less balance it . Now its fine i can balance yield and tank( Thougth same balancing is still needed among barges ) Now i wish that ccp would do some think about mining that it would be so god damn annoying. |

Lord Ryan
True Xero
682
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 18:06:00 -
[33] - Quote
nerf stuff! Do not assume-áanything above this line-áwas typed by me. Nerf the Truth, it's inconvenient. Nerf it cause I can't fly it. I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1206
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 18:17:00 -
[34] - Quote
Kestutis Fujika wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Kestutis Fujika wrote:Show me any kills were t3 got killed with 2 destroyers in high sec. If u put tank before balance you lose all yield bonuses , but all other ships can balance dmg ewar and tank modules and Hulks , macs and other couldn't it was tank or yield. Hulk should be on pair with BC (power grid, cpu , number of slots and so on) . Yes they or not meant for battle , but that doesn't mean they have to be paper thin. Why in the world should the Hulk be on par with a BC? Cause you don't feel like having to make choices? There are 3 things that matter to a mining ship. Tank, Yield, and Cargo. If you keep insisting that a mining ship is worthless without max Yield, you'll keep getting ganked.* Everyone else has to make fitting choices between elements that matter to their ship, why shouldn't Miners have to? *No longer true, since CCP codified in game mechanics the fact that miners are too stupid to protect themselves. But what about efficiency ? Miners are no different from pvper or pvers everyone has its goals. Be its isk/h or killmails, but everyone should be on even grounds.Before update it was hardly possible .Miners had sacrifice there efficiency for tank while other activities of eve could more or less balance it . Now its fine i can balance yield and tank( Thougth same balancing is still needed among barges ) Now i wish that ccp would do some think about mining that it would be so god damn annoying. So you're trying to say PVP'ers don't sacrifice DPS or speed for tank?
This is the most broken argument I've ever seen. Mining is annoying, so you shouldn't have to fit a tank?
The dumbness is really flowing here.
PVP'ers make the same sacrifices miners were expected to but failed to make. So now 2/3 of the ORE ships have stupid EHP and giant ore bays.
When do I get a PVP boat with a built-in-tank so I can fit 100% for damage and still expect to survive an attack?  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Kult Altol
Republican Industries Epsilon Fleet
117
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 18:17:00 -
[35] - Quote
Pixel hard man, made me lol. A narrow mind is a focused mind. |

Pipa Porto
1104
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 18:26:00 -
[36] - Quote
Kestutis Fujika wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Why in the world should the Hulk be on par with a BC? Cause you don't feel like having to make choices?
There are 3 things that matter to a mining ship. Tank, Yield, and Cargo. If you keep insisting that a mining ship is worthless without max Yield, you'll keep getting ganked.* Everyone else has to make fitting choices between elements that matter to their ship, why shouldn't Miners have to?
*No longer true, since CCP codified in game mechanics the fact that miners are too stupid to protect themselves. But what about efficiency ? Miners are no different from pvper or pvers everyone has its goals. Be its isk/h or killmails, but everyone should be on even grounds.Before update it was hardly possible .Miners had sacrifice there efficiency for tank while other activities of eve could more or less balance it . Now its fine i can balance yield and tank( Thougth same balancing is still needed among barges ) Now i wish that ccp would do some think about mining that it would be so god damn annoying.
How efficient are you when you lose a ship?
Before the Update, you could fit the Hulk to mine more than any other ship in the game while tanking enough that ganking it was unprofitable.
You could also go with, say, 1 MLU and put up a tank stiff enough to discourage most ganks (and be unprofitable to gank anywhere .7 or north). That's what balancing priorities is.
Miners were complaining that they couldn't fit an unprofitable-to-gank tank while fitting 2 MLUs. Where's the balancing act there?
No, now you get both high yield and an unprofitable-to-gank tank AND a built in Jetcan. You haven't made any choices to balance anything, CCP's just straight up buffed you to safety. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

baltec1
Bat Country
2322
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 18:34:00 -
[37] - Quote
Kestutis Fujika wrote:
Show me any kills were t3 got killed with 2 destroyers in high sec. If u put tank before balance you lose all yield bonuses , but all other ships can balance dmg ewar and tank modules and Hulks , macs and other couldn't it was tank or yield. Hulk should be on pair with BC (power grid, cpu , number of slots and so on) . Yes they or not meant for battle , but that doesn't mean they have to be paper thin.
You do realise that with all the hardeners off most tengu have around the same base tank as a hulk right? You catch them outside a staion or on the way to a mission and payday.
As for the hulks:
[Hulk, New Setup 1] Mining Laser Upgrade II Damage Control II
Small Shield Extender II Invulnerability Field II Survey Scanner II Magnetic Scattering Amplifier II
Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Mining Drone II x5 Warrior II x5
Pre buff fit. Unprofitable to gank yet it still has MLU. Its was just like every other ship, you chose what level of gank or tank you want. Its on par with heavy assault cruisers. |

Kestutis Fujika
Critical Mass ltd.
3
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 18:37:00 -
[38] - Quote
[Hulk, miner] Mining Laser Upgrade II Damage Control II
Small Shield Extender II Small Shield Extender II EM Ward Amplifier II Thermic Dissipation Amplifier II
Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Processor Overclocking Unit I
Hammerhead II x5
My hulk looked something like this and i was ganged several times. And i had only i upgrade and still got my ass kicked. |

Pipa Porto
1104
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 18:40:00 -
[39] - Quote
Kestutis Fujika wrote:My hulk looked something like this and i was ganged several times. And i had only i upgrade and still got my ass kicked.
How profitable was it for them to gank you?
If someone is willing to throw money away to hurt you, the fact that they end up hurting you isn't a problem. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

baltec1
Bat Country
2322
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 18:43:00 -
[40] - Quote
Kestutis Fujika wrote:
My hulk looked something like this and i was ganged several times. And i had only i upgrade and still got my ass kicked.
I see no Hulk losses in your history. This means either your hulk survived or you are telling porkies. |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 18:55:00 -
[41] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kestutis Fujika wrote:
Show me any kills were t3 got killed with 2 destroyers in high sec. If u put tank before balance you lose all yield bonuses , but all other ships can balance dmg ewar and tank modules and Hulks , macs and other couldn't it was tank or yield. Hulk should be on pair with BC (power grid, cpu , number of slots and so on) . Yes they or not meant for battle , but that doesn't mean they have to be paper thin.
You do realise that with all the hardeners off most tengu have around the same base tank as a hulk right? You catch them outside a staion or on the way to a mission and payday. As for the hulks: [Hulk, New Setup 1] Mining Laser Upgrade II Damage Control II Small Shield Extender II Invulnerability Field II Survey Scanner II Magnetic Scattering Amplifier II Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Mining Drone II x5 Warrior II x5 Pre buff fit. Unprofitable to gank yet it still has MLU and even a rock scanner(T2 no less). Its was just like every other ship, you chose what level of gank or tank you want. Its on par with heavy assault cruisers right out of the box.
I think the reason many people didnt tank thier ship is somewhat linked to cross training for all the required skill reduced thier percived progression. Of course it's stupid to see it that way but even when I started 2 months ago, I was chain training mining and boat skill to get better yields total. The support stuff seemed useless to me back then because I wanted to mine and not fight. All that shield, armor and resistance were not linked to what I wanted to do so to hell with that right. It's a bad way of doing it but I am pretty sure many people saw it like that when they make mining thier carrer. I guess gettign ganked is supposed to be learning the hard way. Too bad some people get nothign out of this "class". |

baltec1
Bat Country
2322
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 19:10:00 -
[42] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:
I think the reason many people didnt tank thier ship is somewhat linked to cross training for all the required skill reduced thier percived progression. Of course it's stupid to see it that way but even when I started 2 months ago, I was chain training mining and boat skill to get better yields total. The support stuff seemed useless to me back then because I wanted to mine and not fight. All that shield, armor and resistance were not linked to what I wanted to do so to hell with that right. It's a bad way of doing it but I am pretty sure many people saw it like that when they make mining thier carrer. I guess gettign ganked is supposed to be learning the hard way. Too bad some people get nothign out of this "class".
No doubt. The same can be said for hauler pilots and salvagers. Unfortunatly many people dont seem to be able to learn lessons when they get blown up. I spent 8 months giving out fittings and tactics to miners and they still died by the hundreds. When CCP went into testing the barge upgrades it wasn't the miners helping them with feedback it was people like me. The very people killing them sat down with CCP and tried to give them options including a gankproof ship in the form of the skiff. Unfortunatly CCP buffed the tank on the mack which means the skiff is now pointless. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4946
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 19:24:00 -
[43] - Quote
Kestutis Fujika wrote:Let make it so that ur tengus and other shines would blow up from 3 thrashers or sentrys. Since we all need to put tank.
an untanked/undertanked Tengu will die to few destroyers, just FYI please leave |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1206
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 19:30:00 -
[44] - Quote
I am still wondering about those pre-tanked PVP ships that let us fit for 100% efficient offensive capabilities and still survive. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Dragon Outlaw
Rogue Fleet
132
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 19:44:00 -
[45] - Quote
Yes please buff ganking...cause I dont like shooting at ships that can shoot back. I also hate my life and need to make someone somewhere rage by blowing up is ship when he least expects it. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1207
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 19:51:00 -
[46] - Quote
Dragon Outlaw wrote:Yes please buff ganking...cause I dont like shooting at ships that can shoot back. I also hate my life and need to make someone somewhere rage after I killed is ship when he least expected it. There are plenty of reasons to gank miners that don't involve hating your life or a "need to make someone somewhere rage."
As for playing games, I bet when you play Uno you always unload your Draw Fours. Even if your opponent has a handful of cards already. Even if they just got skipped. Even if your opponent cries about it, you aren't getting caught with those Draw Fours in-hand. You're going to play them, grief your opponent who couldn't play because you skipped them, and win the game.
Eveis a game, too. If people cry over a game, that's too bad.
When you undock in Eve you can be shot.
Cold.
Harsh.
Universe.
HTFU much? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Dragon Outlaw
Rogue Fleet
132
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 19:58:00 -
[47] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Dragon Outlaw wrote:Yes please buff ganking...cause I dont like shooting at ships that can shoot back. I also hate my life and need to make someone somewhere rage after I killed is ship when he least expected it. There are plenty of reasons to gank miners that don't involve hating your life or a "need to make someone somewhere rage." As for playing games, I bet when you play Uno you always unload your Draw Fours. Even if your opponent has a handful of cards already. Even if they just got skipped. Even if your opponent cries about it, you aren't getting caught with those Draw Fours in-hand. You're going to play them, grief your opponent who couldn't play because you skipped them, and win the game. Eve is a game, too. If people cry over a game, that's too bad. When you undock in Eve you can be shot. Cold. Harsh. Universe. HTFU much?
I dont need Eve to HTFU. I do that in real life.
As for UNO, never played that game. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2322
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 20:01:00 -
[48] - Quote
Dragon Outlaw wrote:
As for UNO, never played that game.
Oh you should. |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 20:02:00 -
[49] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:
I think the reason many people didnt tank thier ship is somewhat linked to cross training for all the required skill reduced thier percived progression. Of course it's stupid to see it that way but even when I started 2 months ago, I was chain training mining and boat skill to get better yields total. The support stuff seemed useless to me back then because I wanted to mine and not fight. All that shield, armor and resistance were not linked to what I wanted to do so to hell with that right. It's a bad way of doing it but I am pretty sure many people saw it like that when they make mining thier carrer. I guess gettign ganked is supposed to be learning the hard way. Too bad some people get nothign out of this "class".
No doubt. The same can be said for hauler pilots and salvagers. Unfortunatly many people dont seem to be able to learn lessons when they get blown up. I spent 8 months giving out fittings and tactics to miners and they still died by the hundreds. When CCP went into testing the barge upgrades it wasn't the miners helping them with feedback it was people like me. The very people killing them sat down with CCP and tried to give them options including a gankproof ship in the form of the skiff. Unfortunatly CCP buffed the tank on the mack which means the skiff is now pointless.
CCP will need to find a better way to teach if they ever want to stop flooding small countries with tears... |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 20:04:00 -
[50] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Dragon Outlaw wrote:
As for UNO, never played that game.
Oh you should.
I played "8" with regular decks of cards instead. The rules were pretty similar to uno tho but with a few added rules which enabled **** moves sometime. Unloading a 4 of a kind of "2" to make someone draw 10 card on a single turn or 4 jacks to skip the next 4 turns...
HTFU UNO players! |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
155
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 20:06:00 -
[51] - Quote
captain foivos wrote:Retribution is all about balancing ships and what not, so why not balance out ganking a bit while you're at it? Over the last eight years, ganking has been nerfed nearly into the ground, with only a few select groups of highly skilled, well funded individuals continuing to separate stupid highsec mongoloids from their precious shiny things. Why not buff immoral activity for a change? Reward smart people for taking basic precautions against dying and loss, like not traveling around with billions in their hold, not clicking on the contracts in Jita local, and not traveling the Rancer Pipe with hundreds of PLEX in the cargo bay.
Ganking keeps getting hit with more and more nerfs: pretty soon there won't be that "cold harsh universe" left that CCP keeps going on about in their promos. EVE belongs to the violent, the venal, and the brilliant. Buff ganking. Nerf dumb people.
I would sign on to your suggestions 100% under one condition: any ganking attempt, successful or otherwise, results in an immediate -10 security AND faction standing hit, and ganker is immediately ejected in his pod to null somewhere randomly, and is unable to enter any space above .4 in any way, shape or form. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1208
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 20:09:00 -
[52] - Quote
Dragon Outlaw wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Dragon Outlaw wrote:Yes please buff ganking...cause I dont like shooting at ships that can shoot back. I also hate my life and need to make someone somewhere rage after I killed is ship when he least expected it. There are plenty of reasons to gank miners that don't involve hating your life or a "need to make someone somewhere rage." As for playing games, I bet when you play Uno you always unload your Draw Fours. Even if your opponent has a handful of cards already. Even if they just got skipped. Even if your opponent cries about it, you aren't getting caught with those Draw Fours in-hand. You're going to play them, grief your opponent who couldn't play because you skipped them, and win the game. Eve is a game, too. If people cry over a game, that's too bad. When you undock in Eve you can be shot. Cold. Harsh. Universe. HTFU much? I dont need Eve to HTFU. I do that in real life. As for UNO, never played that game. That you choose to bring your real-life essence into this argument is proof-positive that you don't have much of an argument to make. You're hard in real life so you feel comfortable whining about possibly getting ganked in a game. I can certainly respect that. 
Are there any games you play besides Eve that I might use as a better metaphor for what it means to play a game, even one as rich as Eve?
Perhaps you play Sorry! and expect your opponents to never send your piece back to "start?" Maybe you play poker and expect your opponent to not bluff just because you've got a decent hand? I really wouldn't know. But I think you get the idea.
Being HTFU'd in RL is great. This is a game. HTFU'ing in a game should be, really, a whole lot easier than being HTFU'd in the real world. That's my two cents on this... He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
178
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 20:12:00 -
[53] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Things are not balanced by cost
Are you saying that ganker should be able to profitable gank my ship if I tank my ship properly (this means I use money and cost goes up). |

Elinarien
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 20:12:00 -
[54] - Quote
I've played many MMOs and competitive pvp games over the years but Eve is the first I've come across where people are asking for a buff to be able to take out the lowest rank of opposition.
What next? shouts across the forums to nerf the ibis / velator etc?
Personally I could not care less about ganking (my main has been in this game since early 2010 and has never been ganked) but seriously it's not good for one's image to ask for a buff to take out civvies. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1208
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 20:13:00 -
[55] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:captain foivos wrote:Retribution is all about balancing ships and what not, so why not balance out ganking a bit while you're at it? Over the last eight years, ganking has been nerfed nearly into the ground, with only a few select groups of highly skilled, well funded individuals continuing to separate stupid highsec mongoloids from their precious shiny things. Why not buff immoral activity for a change? Reward smart people for taking basic precautions against dying and loss, like not traveling around with billions in their hold, not clicking on the contracts in Jita local, and not traveling the Rancer Pipe with hundreds of PLEX in the cargo bay.
Ganking keeps getting hit with more and more nerfs: pretty soon there won't be that "cold harsh universe" left that CCP keeps going on about in their promos. EVE belongs to the violent, the venal, and the brilliant. Buff ganking. Nerf dumb people. I would sign on to your suggestions 100% under one condition: any ganking attempt, successful or otherwise, results in an immediate -10 security AND faction standing hit, and ganker is immediately ejected in his pod to null somewhere randomly, and is unable to enter any space above .4 in any way, shape or form. Because miners clearly got a coinciding nerf with their mega-buff. 
Oh, but wait! I wrote another thread about that topic. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 20:20:00 -
[56] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:That you choose to bring your real-life essence into this argument is proof-positive that you don't have much of an argument to make. You're hard in real life so you feel comfortable whining about possibly getting ganked in a game. I can certainly respect that.  Are there any games you play besides Eve that I might use as a better metaphor for what it means to play a game, even one as rich as Eve? Perhaps you play Sorry! and expect your opponents to never send your piece back to "start?" Maybe you play poker and expect your opponent to not bluff just because you've got a decent hand? I really wouldn't know. But I think you get the idea. Being HTFU'd in RL is great. This is a game. HTFU'ing in a game should be, really, a whole lot easier than being HTFU'd in the real world. That's my two cents on this...
The problem I think is many people play game to chill out after a work day. HTFU is not something they want out of a game. EvE is not the right game for them at least now since HTFU is pretty much the norm here. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2323
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 20:21:00 -
[57] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:baltec1 wrote:Things are not balanced by cost Are you saying that ganker should be able to profitable gank my ship if I tank my ship properly (this means I use money and cost goes up)?
If said ship is carrying stuff worth more than you can tank then yes.
|

baltec1
Bat Country
2323
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 20:22:00 -
[58] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:
The problem I think is many people play game to chill out after a work day. HTFU is not something they want out of a game. EvE is not the right game for them at least now since HTFU is pretty much the norm here.
Its never been the right game for those people. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1211
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 20:26:00 -
[59] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:That you choose to bring your real-life essence into this argument is proof-positive that you don't have much of an argument to make. You're hard in real life so you feel comfortable whining about possibly getting ganked in a game. I can certainly respect that.  Are there any games you play besides Eve that I might use as a better metaphor for what it means to play a game, even one as rich as Eve? Perhaps you play Sorry! and expect your opponents to never send your piece back to "start?" Maybe you play poker and expect your opponent to not bluff just because you've got a decent hand? I really wouldn't know. But I think you get the idea. Being HTFU'd in RL is great. This is a game. HTFU'ing in a game should be, really, a whole lot easier than being HTFU'd in the real world. That's my two cents on this... The problem I think is many people play game to chill out after a work day. HTFU is not something they want out of a game. EvE is not the right game for them at least now since HTFU is pretty much the norm here.
Your last sentence is really well said, though I'm not sure it's a problem, per-se.
Relaxing while playing Eve seems a lot to me like trying to take a cat nap while playing Gran Turismo 5. Sure, you can set the computer up to run your races for you, but then you're not playing a game, you're watching the result of a computer playing a game.
CCP clearly says they want players attentive and at their keyboards. The mining buff seems to send the opposite message. The only way I can see for CCP to remain consistent in this message is to buff ganking (at least somewhat) to re-introduce the concept of risk to miners.
A bonus effect would be an improvement in ore and mineral prices for those miners who continue to mine successfully after such a ganking buff.  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
768
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 20:34:00 -
[60] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote: Cold.
Harsh.
Universe.
This is what finally high sec is becoming to gankers. A real cold harsh universe instead of a brainless-no-consequence activity brb |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |