Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 74 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |

Buzzy Warstl
The Strontium Asylum
231
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:09:00 -
[451] - Quote
La Nariz wrote: E: I should add social interaction (diplomacy) in general is one of the challenges 0.0 industrialists are forced to grapple with that highsec industrialists can completely ignore. Yet the 0.0 industrialist gets virtually no advantage for doing so. If anything this reason alone is enough to warrant a nerf to the entirety of highsec's industrial capabilities.
In theory the ability to build supercaps is a pretty big advantage. Whether the market conditions at any given point support that theory is obviously another question.
Highsec industrialists can't even build dreads, though, so saying that there is no advantage to doing industry outside highsec is ignoring a few limitations of highsec industry.
There's certainly no advantage to building things that *can* be built in highsec in nullsec as things currently stand, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing given the current shape of the game. Changing it so that nullsec industry was advantaged in every respect would be a quite dramatic change, and I'm not even sure that it is really possible. http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm
Richard Bartle: Players who suit MUDs |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
682
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:11:00 -
[452] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Weaselior wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: This thrash talk (assuming you refer to the null sec industrialist "hate") is exactly what happened to me, should I invent an alternate reality that makes me feel happier? It happened not in 1 but in *2* alliances and one of them is called Initiative Alliance (no idea if they are related to yours).
i see, so the fact everyone hated you means they all hated industrialists
Because I was alone in there, had nobody with me to talk with, I did not have two chats and IRC where to talk about those things, there were no others applying for the same positions and talking with me. 
I have not read the rest of this thread, as I hear it is a bad one. However, I was linked to this post and it struck me as similar enough to myself to reply.
For whatever reason, I was the only one of my kind within goons. There were other rich goons before me, but they were simply rich, or EFFORT. I abhor effort so tend to only focus on ISK:EFFORT or making markets, not reacting to them.
For the past 2 1/2 years, I have been teaching goons in a jabber channel all they could learn about EVE markets, the economy, and how to manipulate, speculate. Even the ones that didn't learn anything would profit greatly by just buying and selling when told. For all of this effort, I have only one other person like myself to show for it, (Mynnna/Corestwo). Then another handful of guys who have specific areas of expertise (Dramaticus), or a financial role(Weaselior).
So starting alone, and creating a cabal of guys that can move the EVE economy at will. With a personality. type that doesn't lend itself to making friends. The EVE sandbox is complex enough now to work magic in gaming. But you need help to do so.
Learn to make friends. Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Cabal Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
516
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:11:00 -
[453] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Weaselior wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Because I was alone in there, had nobody with me to talk with, I did not have two chats and IRC where to talk about those things, there were no others applying for the same positions and talking with me.  neither did i, until i found the other people, because this being a mmo part of the skill is making friends goonswarm didn't always have a strong industrial arm and community: i and others created it rather than moan it did not exist and flee to empire If you had 5 minutes a day to play the game for a year+ like I had, you'd have created a fat zero. I quit my friends because I felt like a dead weight on them even if they never asked me to leave. But hey, you know everything about everybody's life, don't you?
Stop. You know far better than many not to get trapped trying to justify anything to the trolls.
I know you are trying to fight the good fight, as I have also. But you are letting the designated attack guys from the propaganda wing get under your skin. Don't.
What you should do is get all your indy buddies from the S&I and MD forums to start petitioning CCP and screaming blue murder about what goons and the rest of the null sec zealots have planned for high sec industry.
Frankly, I think it is a lost cause, as the pattern over the last year is "goon-led propaganda campaign against a high sec mechanic, 6 months later CCP hammers said high sec mechanic", and high sec industry is the next thing in their sights.
But you may still hold out some hope that the upcoming carnage can be stopped. If that is true, ignore the forums and petition CCP directly, or if you want to fight the propaganda war, you are going to need a LOT more people posting on the side of sanity. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4019
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:19:00 -
[454] - Quote
Aryth wrote: For the past 2 1/2 years, I have been teaching goons in a jabber channel all they could learn about EVE markets, the economy, and how to manipulate, speculate. Even the ones that didn't learn anything would profit greatly by just buying and selling when told. For all of this effort, I have only one other person like myself to show for it, (Mynnna/Corestwo). Then another handful of guys who have specific areas of expertise (Dramaticus), or a financial role(Weaselior).
ahem it wan't you who discovered guidance systems buddy |

Dramaticus
Goonswarm Federation
346
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:25:00 -
[455] - Quote
I am a kosher meat popsicle. bring back images |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
2324
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:28:00 -
[456] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:If you want I can post a screenshot of my farewell eve mail to my FW and null sec PvP corp mates, it does not mention "risk" anywhere. I would not have gone there if risk was so much of an issue for me. Actually I bought them a capital parts BPO (it was ALL my money) as my thank you for the time I have been there. yeah you keep saying "i would never put that much money at risk" for why 0.0 industry can never take off so that's nonsense, your entire argument is predicated on all potential 0.0 industrialists being as risk averse as you being willing to lose a t1 frig doesn't suddenly make you not risk averse it just means that there is a certain level of isk loss that is too minimal to care about
My corp did not make large use of T1 frigs, nor of fleets of Drakes. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4019
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:29:00 -
[457] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: My corp did not make large use of T1 frigs, nor of fleets of Drakes.
i see you used [ship too small to care about its loss that is not a t1 frig or drake] instead, which is relevant to the point of risking amounts of assets that would hurt to lose because... |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
2324
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:32:00 -
[458] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: My corp did not make large use of T1 frigs, nor of fleets of Drakes.
i see you used [ship too small to care about its loss that is not a t1 frig or drake] instead, which is relevant to the point of risking amounts of assets that would hurt to lose because...
I was a new-ish player with 50M ISK in bank at the time and I used an Hurricane and Cyclone (no ship loss reimbursement at that time). Sure they weren't titans but that was more daring to someone using a battleship with ship reimbursement program plus 2B ISK in bank. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
314
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:34:00 -
[459] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:people posting on the side of sanity. Goons post sanity, high-sec zealots post insanity. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4019
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:34:00 -
[460] - Quote
hurricanes and cyclones insured nearly perfectly back then
plus you apparently got cold feet about even those losses pronto |
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
2324
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:37:00 -
[461] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Stop. You know far better than many not to get trapped trying to justify anything to the trolls.
I have nothing to hide, they say stuff to which I can reply any time and have screenshots of anything including my mails.
Also, I don't have anything special hard "against" Goons or PvPers in general, I joined EvE to PvP like I have always done... then RL happened.  Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
2324
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:39:00 -
[462] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:hurricanes and cyclones insured nearly perfectly back then
plus you apparently got cold feet about even those losses pronto
"Don't fly what you cannot afford to lose", with all of 50M to my name I was quite close. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
2324
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:52:00 -
[463] - Quote
Aryth wrote:
I have not read the rest of this thread, as I hear it is a bad one. However, I was linked to this post and it struck me as similar enough to myself to reply.
For whatever reason, I was the only one of my kind within goons. There were other rich goons before me, but they were simply rich, or EFFORT. I abhor effort so tend to only focus on ISK:EFFORT or making markets, not reacting to them.
For the past 2 1/2 years, I have been teaching goons in a jabber channel all they could learn about EVE markets, the economy, and how to manipulate, speculate. Even the ones that didn't learn anything would profit greatly by just buying and selling when told. For all of this effort, I have only one other person like myself to show for it, (Mynnna/Corestwo). Then another handful of guys who have specific areas of expertise (Dramaticus), or a financial role(Weaselior).
So starting alone, and creating a cabal of guys that can move the EVE economy at will. With a personality. type that doesn't lend itself to making friends. The EVE sandbox is complex enough now to work magic in gaming. But you need help to do so.
Learn to make friends.
You are actually my favourite Goonswarm leader, in another life I'd have loved to be one of your corp or even closer than that. You impersonate the "master mind behind everything", you even made references to Lex Luthor (good stuff!). Has to be awesome to have a brain like you around. 
As for the puny me vs friends thingie: I came to EvE as my "retirement" game because after many years of playing 12h+ a day on some hard core teams I felt I was losing performance big time, it was time to go in a relaxed game but still with some big PvP. Of course 2 weeks after I joined EvE I had already forgot the "retirement" thingie and started seeking for a PvP corp. I found some very good friends and everything was quite good till it lasted, then the company I worked back at the time started both suffering a crysis (that in 2011 led to their closure) and reassigning people to the most time consuming and mad schedules possible (including having to travel to distant clients a lot). Since I could not play with them but few minutes a day I felt I was betraying their efforts and so I sent them a letter explaining my situation and left. Since then my friends have been an industry corp guys (about 30) and then a logistic mercs corp guys. ATM I don't have time again, so my stuff is passively running itself and I am effectively cut off EvE. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
290
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 21:06:00 -
[464] - Quote
Buzzy Warstl wrote: In theory the ability to build supercaps is a pretty big advantage. Whether the market conditions at any given point support that theory is obviously another question.
Highsec industrialists can't even build dreads, though, so saying that there is no advantage to doing industry outside highsec is ignoring a few limitations of highsec industry.
There's certainly no advantage to building things that *can* be built in highsec in nullsec as things currently stand, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing given the current shape of the game. Changing it so that nullsec industry was advantaged in every respect would be a quite dramatic change, and I'm not even sure that it is really possible.
Supercap production and capital production are a function of game mechanics and while in the domain of industry are not what this thread is about at all. What about the npc-0.0 industrialist? What about the lowsec industrialist? What about the WH industrialist? All good questions that you probably shouldn't bring up because they destroy your argument.
That bold part is important, it is bad that people who go the extra effort to make friends and risk their fortunes in infrastructure used to produce have no advantage over the solo highsec industrialist. It is an incentive against player interactions in an MMO, which I'm sure you'll agree is bad. CCP certainly does when they stated that players who find corporations (social groups) they like are far more likely to stay with EVE than players who do not find corporations (social groups) that they like. I'll say it again the fact that nullsec industrialists require social interaction (diplomacy) to operate at all is a good reason to warrant a nerf to the entirety of highsec's industrial capabilities.
E: These forums need comic sans npc alts aren't people |

Codie Dunier
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 21:31:00 -
[465] - Quote
Bump Truck wrote:13) This is just about some players trying to force everyone to play like them. No... Null-sec inhabitants don't force anyone to play like them. They entice the High-sec inhabitants to try playing in other regions of space. World of difference. |

Buzzy Warstl
The Strontium Asylum
231
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 21:40:00 -
[466] - Quote
"Nerf him because I'm better than he is" is the worst argument for a change to the game, and that's essentially what you are saying.
Access to features is a benefit. Some features cost more than others. The cost of being able to build supercapital ships in a system includes having crap-all other industry there. Maybe that will change with the POS updates. Maybe it won't, but highsec industry won't get the kind of nerf you want, nor have you made a convincing case as to why it should. http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm
Richard Bartle: Players who suit MUDs |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4022
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:25:00 -
[467] - Quote
Buzzy Warstl wrote:"Nerf him because I'm better than he is" is the worst argument for a change to the game, and that's essentially what you are saying.
Access to features is a benefit. Some features cost more than others. The cost of being able to build supercapital ships in a system includes having crap-all other industry there. Maybe that will change with the POS updates. Maybe it won't, but highsec industry won't get the kind of nerf you want, nor have you made a convincing case as to why it should. congrats this is literally a defense of any possible feature set |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy
353
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:25:00 -
[468] - Quote
again with this thread? The op here is forwarding a premise that is not true, that CCP are going to nerf high sec out of need or just because. It apparently will be for the same typical political falsehood of reason that states that GÇ£you are poor because someone else has too much money." Second, another blatant political tact, it misrepresents the opposition stance in order more easily combat them or make them look petty.
The truth is:
High sec earnings have already been cut quite a bit. There is no reason to blame high sec for the problems of other sectors in eve.
Why change high sec more? Goon-swarm has already proven that high sec is neither safe nor pvp free. In doing so, yes, they over played their hand - making high sec actually more dangerous than null sec in many ways. This caused many to complain that the value of high sec should actually be restored to its former glory. Instead, CCP chose to revamp industrial ships, a move that was long overdue. Still, the value is lower in high sec and the activity is not as full featured as other regions.
There is no reason to make high sec and null sec similar... In fact, the game is more interesting with regions that have very different play and rules regarding that play.
Low Sec cannot be "fixed" by changing either null sec or high sec. There are many reasons low sec is what it is... not the least of which is that many null sec players like it the way it is. It provides a no manGÇÖs land buffer between their space and the general population.
I actually think there is room for one more layer/region of space - the Gǣgigantic outer galaxyGǥ where there are no gates, no local chat of any kind, and no pos/outpost possible; the dangers there should be extreme... read: not pirates/player on player danger as much as other dangers. Every celestial body should need be scanned down to find. GǪIn this place there could be very dangerous activities that could lead to more wealth for the lucky. There should also be SOS or distress beacons added to ships...so players could have a last resort to open chat with people who may be near enough to help. Put it on the outside of null sec, giving null sectarians a good reason to be there and giving others reason to try to blockade run or usurp null sec space. This would require a whole lot of new ideas and new types of play GǪwhich I would heartily welcome.
Anyway, quit picking on high sec ..it's not the reasons for your woes. [IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG] |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4022
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:26:00 -
[469] - Quote
plus people who have trouble understanding the concept of risk/reward are not the focus group we use when trying to tell if our arguments are convincing |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4022
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:33:00 -
[470] - Quote
Barbara Nichole wrote: Anyway, quit picking on high sec ..it's not the reasons for your woes.
thank you, your long post managing to show you had grasped the tiniest bit of what was discussed was illuminating and extremely convincing and not at all a waste of precious electrons
it was insightful of you to pinpoint the specific arguments for nerfing highsec you had identified and rebutted such as
uh
that there should be some new form of space that is an entirely different game |
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
2324
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:41:00 -
[471] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:plus people who have trouble understanding the concept of risk/reward are not the focus group we use when trying to tell if our arguments are convincing
What would be your ideal focus group?
- Null sec players probably support your point of view without need to explain them more.
- WH players probably don't care a lot, they know they are not going to get a lot of positive changes (no outposts etc, maybe a buff to their refineries but that certainly does not regard an hi sec debate).
- Low sec players have an independend playstyle so your pleas won't entice them that much, plus they have stations, facilities etc.
- Hi sec players are strongly against the 8th nerf or whatever the counter is at.
So, besides talking to those already agreeing with you, who are the others? Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4022
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:44:00 -
[472] - Quote
the intelligentsia of eve naturally
those with the wit to understand concepts and arguments rather than 'this maybe make wallet good' |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4022
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:45:00 -
[473] - Quote
no npc corp alts or people regurgitating tactics outdated by half a decade need apply |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4023
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:49:00 -
[474] - Quote
for example you might pick the ceo and cfo of an insanely tech-rich alliance that repeatedly agitated for a tech nerf |

Zeko Rena
ENCOM Industries
43
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:51:00 -
[475] - Quote
Could you not have just combined those four posts into one? |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4023
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:52:00 -
[476] - Quote
could you not consolidate all the wood in your chair into a single log? |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
2325
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:53:00 -
[477] - Quote
Zeko Rena wrote:Could you not have just combined those four posts into one?
He's tweeting. Given his audience tight selection, he's tweeting basically to himself. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1957
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:56:00 -
[478] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:for example you might pick the ceo and cfo of an insanely tech-rich alliance that repeatedly agitated for a tech nerf I can't possibly think of one, please remind me ! Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Buzzy Warstl
The Strontium Asylum
232
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 23:25:00 -
[479] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Buzzy Warstl wrote:"Nerf him because I'm better than he is" is the worst argument for a change to the game, and that's essentially what you are saying.
Access to features is a benefit. Some features cost more than others. The cost of being able to build supercapital ships in a system includes having crap-all other industry there. Maybe that will change with the POS updates. Maybe it won't, but highsec industry won't get the kind of nerf you want, nor have you made a convincing case as to why it should. congrats this is literally a defense of any possible feature set Not really.
It's only an insistence that you have a better reason for it that "I worked hard for what I have, why to they get something shiny?!"
I could make a really good case for removing jump drives from the game, that they make nullsec too small and remove the entire concept of a border region from nullsec strategy. It doesn't have anything to do with whether anyone in the game deserves to be able to use jump drives and everything to do with the shape of space and how the game is played.
Weaselior wrote:I'll say it again the fact that nullsec industrialists require social interaction (diplomacy) to operate at all is a good reason to warrant a nerf to the entirety of highsec's industrial capabilities.
Right here is, however, where you cross the line from reasoned argument to spoiled brat.
What you did to have what you do has no bearing on what others should have and what is in the best interests of the game as a whole.
Grow up already. http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm
Richard Bartle: Players who suit MUDs |

Bump Truck
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
96
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 23:36:00 -
[480] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:[quote=Weaselior][quote=Vaerah Vahrokha] ... Stop. You know far better than many not to get trapped trying to justify anything to the trolls. I know you are trying to fight the good fight, as I have also. But you are letting the designated attack guys from the propaganda wing get under your skin. Don't. What you should do is get all your indy buddies from the S&I and MD forums to start petitioning CCP and screaming blue murder about what goons and the rest of the null sec zealots have planned for high sec industry. Frankly, I think it is a lost cause, as the pattern over the last year is "goon-led propaganda campaign against a high sec mechanic, 6 months later CCP hammers said high sec mechanic", and high sec industry is the next thing in their sights. But you may still hold out some hope that the upcoming carnage can be stopped. If that is true, ignore the forums and petition CCP directly, or if you want to fight the propaganda war, you are going to need a LOT more people posting on the side of sanity.
Thanks for your input, please could you post only thoughtful points about the development of the game, I'd appreciate it.
Also I am not a troll, I worked hard to produce an interesting post to further the debate, please don't paint me as one. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 74 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |