Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 .. 254 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
2376
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:54:00 -
[1801] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: Having listened to the whole recording I can not find at any point where Erotica1 continually and maliciously humiliated the contestant. What I heard was the script used for all bonus rooms and the contestant throwing abuse left and right. Long story short he willing gave his stuff over to gamble on quadrupling it and lost. He got angry and for 30 min there was nothing but him tossing insults about, he could have backed out at any time but he didn't.
Erotica1 has done nothing against the EULA. You might not agree with what he does but that is no excuse for this witch hunt you people have embarked upon. You are literally doing the very thing you are accusing Erotica1 of doing, deliberately targeting a player.
Exactly right.
Note also that this comes from a Goon - a group that generally have little time for Ero nowadays. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=326497 --áPsychotic Monk for CSM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. If you want to mine in highsec, read www.minerbumping.com. |

Mario Putzo
Welping and Dunking.
506
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:54:00 -
[1802] - Quote
Xuixien wrote: Laughing at people making fools of themselves? I think that's a past time that goes way back to the dawn of recorded history.
I mean, ****, who didn't grow up watching America's Funniest Home Videos?
It goes back longer than that. Don't forget, all the misfits of the world used to be gainfully employed as freaks in the circus. |

Zappity
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
875
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:55:00 -
[1803] - Quote
Tor Norman wrote:stoicfaux wrote:I can see Erotica being banned I can't see him being banned. Precisely because the damage of the confidence that CCP's customers have in them would be far, far worse for the company than anything Erotica has ever done or could do. I disagree - I can see him being banned. He has crossed a line and it is not going to be healthy for EVE's reputation.
EVE is known as a harsh game where you can be scammed and stolen from. This is as it should be. But the disgusting behavior from both sides of that recording went too far. I wouldn't be at all surprised if both Erotica1 and the contestant were banned. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
239
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:55:00 -
[1804] - Quote
Because of EvE's community, it's not an acceptable place to bring new players.
They should stay away.
It would be like bringing your 14 year old daughter to a biker gang's clubhouse and then leaving her unattended for the entire night.
The community defending the actions of Erotica1 is proof enough that too much of this community is diseased, tainted, and filthy degenerates unworthy of calling themselves human beings.
They're more animal than human. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3572
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:55:00 -
[1805] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Considering TS3's user agreement basically ends at "don't reverse engineer this product", it ought to be funny.
We will see. I am betting teamspeak wont like to be in any way associated with words like, oh i dont know, 1) cyber-bullying 2) online predators 3) vulnerable victim 4) abuse
Well, if you used those words, you lied your ass off.
There is no such thing as cyber bullying, and the "victim" participated of his own free will. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Drone 16
Law Dogz
61
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:55:00 -
[1806] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:Then why didn't he leave the conversation? Its irrelevant. Mail him and ask yourself if you wish for an answer to that question. None of what happened in the TS "Bonus Room" is any of CCPs concern or business. What is of concern to CCP and the community at large, is Erotica1s activities of actively predating on the community for victims with ingame scams that he extends to OUTSIDE THE GAME. You cant do that. Its against the EULA. Scams are fine within the game, it is NOT ok to scam people OUTSIDE the game. Does CCP really have jurisdiction outside of the game?
Not as such but they can act on in-game on things that effect their business. I'm not saying they should I'm simply answering your question. |

Xuixien
Attitude Adjustment Incorporated
857
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:55:00 -
[1807] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Considering TS3's user agreement basically ends at "don't reverse engineer this product", it ought to be funny.
We will see. I am betting teamspeak wont like to be in any way associated with words like, oh i dont know, 1) cyber-bullying 2) online predators 3) vulnerable victim 4) abuse
You're right.
I think Sokahr should absolutely be banned from TS3 for 3 of those. Not sure number 2 even happened, though.
"Online predators"... are you talking about men who lure underaged girls to the park at night? Or social engineer credit card information out of people? Cuz that's not what's happening here. AUT5M - Active WH Corporation seeking new recruits. Frequent fleets, perfect boosts, material buyback, and more. Battleship/Logi/T3 pilots needed. Inquire within. Full API required. |

Rob Kashuken
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
17
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:56:00 -
[1808] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Considering TS3's user agreement basically ends at "don't reverse engineer this product", it ought to be funny.
We will see. I am betting teamspeak wont like to be in any way associated with words like, oh i dont know, 1) cyber-bullying 2) online predators 3) vulnerable victim 4) abuse
Eh, you lost me there. They'll just refer to the carrier's defense, that they just provide the platform, and that they can't mediate on content. I think that the TS angle is not a winnable one here. |

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
2376
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:56:00 -
[1809] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:And Teamspeak is now aware of this issue as well.
Did you make threats of violence against them too, or do you only do that to EVE players? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=326497 --áPsychotic Monk for CSM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. If you want to mine in highsec, read www.minerbumping.com. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2469
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:56:00 -
[1810] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Shizuken wrote:baltec1 wrote:
E1 did non of those things while the "victim" did fall under Harassment for his racially offensive and being threatening to another player.
He continuously baited someone with promises of giving his stuff back, while asking him to do humiliating things drawing attention to a speech impediment. specifically targeted this individual to aggravate him and take advantage of him for 2 hours. That clearly falls under the guidelines quoted. Having listened to the whole recording I can not find at any point where Erotica1 continually and maliciously humiliated the contestant. What I heard was the script used for all bonus rooms and the contestant throwing abuse left and right. Long story short he willing gave his stuff over to gamble on quadrupling it and lost. He got angry and for 30 min there was nothing but him tossing insults about, he could have backed out at any time but he didn't. Erotica1 has done nothing against the EULA. You might not agree with what he does but that is no excuse for this witch hunt you people have embarked upon. You are literally doing the very thing you are accusing Erotica1 of doing, deliberately targeting a player.
First off, the EULA is not the only set of "rules" that define who or what can be said and done in game. Human decency trumps anything that a set of lawyers dreamed up, and in their worst nightmares, no one could imagine the abomination we are discussing now. CCP also is a private company, and can toss any customer they like, for any reason they like, whenever they like. Frankly, I expect one of the cartel members to ban me from the game soon enough.
So just stuff your crap about the EULA and how it is some writing on some stone tablets that the players and CCP must live by, forever, unchanging, and anything not covered in the EULA must be allowed to continue.
And BTW, absolutely, this slime IS being targeted and singled out. Nothing wrong with that at all. If CCP makes a very public example of him, that will have the desired chilling effect on the psychopaths like him, hopefully. There is always a first perpetrator convicted of a new law. And yes, it does not matter that the "law" is not written in the EULA. Common decency trumps that by a mile. CCP can change the EULA after the fact, or not at all.
Humans should not need some idiotic words massaged by some lawyer to know right from wrong, and how to behave in society, even if that society is a cutthroat game. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |
|

Mario Putzo
Welping and Dunking.
506
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:57:00 -
[1811] - Quote
Zappity wrote:Tor Norman wrote:stoicfaux wrote:I can see Erotica being banned I can't see him being banned. Precisely because the damage of the confidence that CCP's customers have in them would be far, far worse for the company than anything Erotica has ever done or could do. I disagree - I can see him being banned. He has crossed a line and it is not going to be healthy for EVE's reputation. EVE is known as a harsh game where you can be scammed and stolen from. This is as it should be. But the disgusting behavior from both sides of that recording went too far. I wouldn't be at all surprised if both Erotica1 and the contestant were banned.
have you listened to the recording? |

Xuixien
Attitude Adjustment Incorporated
857
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:57:00 -
[1812] - Quote
Drone 16 wrote:Xuixien wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:Then why didn't he leave the conversation? Its irrelevant. Mail him and ask yourself if you wish for an answer to that question. None of what happened in the TS "Bonus Room" is any of CCPs concern or business. What is of concern to CCP and the community at large, is Erotica1s activities of actively predating on the community for victims with ingame scams that he extends to OUTSIDE THE GAME. You cant do that. Its against the EULA. Scams are fine within the game, it is NOT ok to scam people OUTSIDE the game. Does CCP really have jurisdiction outside of the game? Not as such but they can act on in-game on things that effect their business. I'm not saying they should I'm simply answering your question.
Maybe they should make Erotica 1 a Dev the same way they made someone else who caused some bad publicity a Dev. AUT5M - Active WH Corporation seeking new recruits. Frequent fleets, perfect boosts, material buyback, and more. Battleship/Logi/T3 pilots needed. Inquire within. Full API required. |

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
820
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:57:00 -
[1813] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:And Teamspeak is now aware of this issue as well.
In your crusade to take this to the masses, have you considered the possible consequences of your actions on Sokhar?
After all, even in a country of 315 million people, how many dual US-Russian former marine air-traffic controllers can there be?
Have you thought of the possibility that his identity could be determined and published somewhere, that his employer might listen to that recording after being approached, that his wife's employer could find out her identity at some point?
Have you asked him about your approach to TS, etc. and whether he is ok with that? eve-bazaar - Discount prices on ships and PLEX. Real savings to drive your ISK further. |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1915
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:58:00 -
[1814] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:baltec1 wrote:Shizuken wrote:baltec1 wrote:
E1 did non of those things while the "victim" did fall under Harassment for his racially offensive and being threatening to another player.
He continuously baited someone with promises of giving his stuff back, while asking him to do humiliating things drawing attention to a speech impediment. specifically targeted this individual to aggravate him and take advantage of him for 2 hours. That clearly falls under the guidelines quoted. Having listened to the whole recording I can not find at any point where Erotica1 continually and maliciously humiliated the contestant. What I heard was the script used for all bonus rooms and the contestant throwing abuse left and right. Long story short he willing gave his stuff over to gamble on quadrupling it and lost. He got angry and for 30 min there was nothing but him tossing insults about, he could have backed out at any time but he didn't. Erotica1 has done nothing against the EULA. You might not agree with what he does but that is no excuse for this witch hunt you people have embarked upon. You are literally doing the very thing you are accusing Erotica1 of doing, deliberately targeting a player. First off, the EULA is not the only set of "rules" that define who or what can be said and done in game. Human decency trumps anything that a set of lawyers dreamed up, and in their worst nightmares, no one could imagine the abomination we are discussing now. CCP also is a private company, and can toss any customer they like, for any reason they like, whenever they like. Frankly, I expect one of the cartel members to ban me from the game soon enough. So just stuff your crap about the EULA and how it is some writing on some stone tablets that the players and CCP must live by, forever, unchanging, and anything not covered in the EULA must be allowed to continue. And BTW, absolutely, this slime IS being targeted and singled out. Nothing wrong with that at all. If CCP makes a very public example of him, that will have the desired chilling effect on the psychopaths like him, hopefully. There is always a first perpetrator convicted of a new law. And yes, it does not matter that the "law" is not written in the EULA. Common decency trumps that by a mile. CCP can change the EULA after the fact, or not at all. Humans should not need some idiotic words massaged by some lawyer to know right from wrong, and how to behave in society, even if that society is a cutthroat game. Hopefully CCP sets an example and sends you to a mental hospital. |

Pshyco Steve
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
8
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:58:00 -
[1815] - Quote
Nothing wrong with what happened at all. The guy who got scammed has no one to blame but himself, if anyting he needs to be banned for making threats and racial comments. There's no reason to act like that over pixels. He was strung along and worked up because he let it get to that point. There's an x on the top of the ts client he could of closed it and left at anytime, but he made the choice to stay there and embarrass himself over and over again. Even his wife made threats, ban her as well.
wead the wules before pwaying this game |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3572
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:58:00 -
[1816] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
First off, the EULA is not the only set of "rules" that define who or what can be said and done in game. Human decency trumps anything that a set of lawyers dreamed up, and in their worst nightmares, no one could imagine the abomination we are discussing now. CCP also is a private company, and can toss any customer they like, for any reason they like, whenever they like. Frankly, I expect one of the cartel members to ban me from the game soon enough.
So just stuff your crap about the EULA and how it is some writing on some stone tablets that the players and CCP must live by, forever, unchanging, and anything not covered in the EULA must be allowed to continue.
And BTW, absolutely, this slime IS being targeted and singled out. Nothing wrong with that at all. If CCP makes a very public example of him, that will have the desired chilling effect on the psychopaths like him, hopefully. There is always a first perpetrator convicted of a new law. And yes, it does not matter that the "law" is not written in the EULA. Common decency trumps that by a mile. CCP can change the EULA after the fact, or not at all.
Humans should not need some idiotic words massaged by some lawyer to know right from wrong, and how to behave in society, even if that society is a cutthroat game.
So, can we get you banned for "common decency" for being a liar, a nuisance, and a libelist? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

PinkPanter
The Scope Gallente Federation
92
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:58:00 -
[1817] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Considering TS3's user agreement basically ends at "don't reverse engineer this product", it ought to be funny.
We will see. I am betting teamspeak wont like to be in any way associated with words like, oh i dont know, 1) cyber-bullying 2) online predators 3) vulnerable victim 4) abuse
Considering how most online media sites are being told to monitor for such activities or will be prosecuted under US or EU laws they might actually look at it.
It's all good when a game is a game. EVE is reaching a point where it all blurs.
Few days ago somebody posted on reddit that local enforcement knocked on his door because few hours later he said something in the lines of "I will kill myself" while playing eve. A CCP employe confirmed that they did notify international law enforcement and etc. With such a horeshit post like this one I guarantee you you have Interpol and all other agencies looking at it as we speak and probably CCP was first to notify them so their hands are clear in case something bad happens. |

Xuixien
Attitude Adjustment Incorporated
857
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:59:00 -
[1818] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Zappity wrote:Tor Norman wrote:stoicfaux wrote:I can see Erotica being banned I can't see him being banned. Precisely because the damage of the confidence that CCP's customers have in them would be far, far worse for the company than anything Erotica has ever done or could do. I disagree - I can see him being banned. He has crossed a line and it is not going to be healthy for EVE's reputation. EVE is known as a harsh game where you can be scammed and stolen from. This is as it should be. But the disgusting behavior from both sides of that recording went too far. I wouldn't be at all surprised if both Erotica1 and the contestant were banned. have you listened to the recording?
Dude... he obviously listened to it.
Ask someone to sing a Gummy Bears song... Gummy Bears to the Rescue!...
... come on if that's not abuse I don't know what is! AUT5M - Active WH Corporation seeking new recruits. Frequent fleets, perfect boosts, material buyback, and more. Battleship/Logi/T3 pilots needed. Inquire within. Full API required. |

LUMINOUS SPIRIT
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
243
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:59:00 -
[1819] - Quote
Teamspeak EULA
11. PROHIBITED CONDUCT
You represent and warrant that you will not violate any of the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and that:
You will not use TeamSpeak software to engage in or allow others to engage in any illegal activity.
And my job is done. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10719
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:59:00 -
[1820] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:baltec1 wrote:Shizuken wrote:baltec1 wrote:
E1 did non of those things while the "victim" did fall under Harassment for his racially offensive and being threatening to another player.
He continuously baited someone with promises of giving his stuff back, while asking him to do humiliating things drawing attention to a speech impediment. specifically targeted this individual to aggravate him and take advantage of him for 2 hours. That clearly falls under the guidelines quoted. Having listened to the whole recording I can not find at any point where Erotica1 continually and maliciously humiliated the contestant. What I heard was the script used for all bonus rooms and the contestant throwing abuse left and right. Long story short he willing gave his stuff over to gamble on quadrupling it and lost. He got angry and for 30 min there was nothing but him tossing insults about, he could have backed out at any time but he didn't. Erotica1 has done nothing against the EULA. You might not agree with what he does but that is no excuse for this witch hunt you people have embarked upon. You are literally doing the very thing you are accusing Erotica1 of doing, deliberately targeting a player. First off, the EULA is not the only set of "rules" that define who or what can be said and done in game. Human decency trumps anything that a set of lawyers dreamed up, and in their worst nightmares, no one could imagine the abomination we are discussing now. CCP also is a private company, and can toss any customer they like, for any reason they like, whenever they like. Frankly, I expect one of the cartel members to ban me from the game soon enough. So just stuff your crap about the EULA and how it is some writing on some stone tablets that the players and CCP must live by, forever, unchanging, and anything not covered in the EULA must be allowed to continue. And BTW, absolutely, this slime IS being targeted and singled out. Nothing wrong with that at all. If CCP makes a very public example of him, that will have the desired chilling effect on the psychopaths like him, hopefully. There is always a first perpetrator convicted of a new law. And yes, it does not matter that the "law" is not written in the EULA. Common decency trumps that by a mile. CCP can change the EULA after the fact, or not at all. Humans should not need some idiotic words massaged by some lawyer to know right from wrong, and how to behave in society, even if that society is a cutthroat game.
Do you even know anything about these bonus rooms? Have you even listened to the recording?
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3572
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 04:00:00 -
[1821] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Teamspeak EULA
11. PROHIBITED CONDUCT
You represent and warrant that you will not violate any of the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and that:
You will not use TeamSpeak software to engage in or allow others to engage in any illegal activity.
And my job is done.
Today I learned that stealing space pixels is apparently illegal. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
12
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 04:00:00 -
[1822] - Quote
Zappity wrote:Tor Norman wrote:stoicfaux wrote:I can see Erotica being banned I can't see him being banned. Precisely because the damage of the confidence that CCP's customers have in them would be far, far worse for the company than anything Erotica has ever done or could do. I disagree - I can see him being banned. He has crossed a line and it is not going to be healthy for EVE's reputation. EVE is known as a harsh game where you can be scammed and stolen from. This is as it should be. But the disgusting behavior from both sides of that recording went too far. I wouldn't be at all surprised if both Erotica1 and the contestant were banned. Because people tease each other? Seriously? Everyone everywhere should be banned from every game ever made and that ever will be made, apparently.
You know what's worse for your reputation? Banning players that haven't broken any rules without warning. Just how much confidence do you think CCP's customers will have that their accounts will remain unmolested? What if I respond to a gank victim's cries of desparation with a "lol"? Should I be banned for that? Because it could've hurt someone's feelings?
In a game where the players are expected to define their own morality, I think that arbitrarily actioning someone's account because they've elected to subscribe to the wrong morals is a particularly bad move. Both in terms of customer confidence and the sandbox nature of EVE. |

Muestereate
Minions LLC
217
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 04:00:00 -
[1823] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:KnowUsByTheDead wrote: Facts I applaud your effort to inject facts and reason into this thread. The sheeple have their ears plugged and eyes covered and their minds are set. Their cries are being heard by some small news sources already. Now, Ero1 will be used as a scapegoat, and CCP will ban him with little to no actual investigation, and Ripard will sit back with a smug look of superiority upon his face knowing he has abused his power as a member of CSM. His blog will gain followers, Eve will gain subs due to the publicity, and the bar will be lowered. Soon, the trolls of GD will be banned for "harassment and torture" by saying "INB4 the lock", and anything in Local chats other than "gf" will lead to account suspensions. Gankers and scammers will be permabanned, arenas will be set up for "PvP", we will shave off the sharp corners, round the edges, and pad the hard areas, replace the sand with non-toxic biodegradable playground sand-like materials, and the pandaverse will be complete. The NeX better start putting in pajamas and hot cocoa, because here comes the softer side of CCP, Pillow Fights Online.
You make it sound as if paradise is just around the corner, bless your soul
|

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
2376
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 04:00:00 -
[1824] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Considering TS3's user agreement basically ends at "don't reverse engineer this product", it ought to be funny.
We will see. I am betting teamspeak wont like to be in any way associated with words like, oh i dont know, 1) cyber-bullying 2) online predators 3) vulnerable victim 4) abuse Well, if you used those words, you lied your ass off. There is no such thing as cyber bullying, and the "victim" participated of his own free will.
Cyber bullying is real. Examples include people making fake Facebook accounts claiming to be the bullying target, then using the fake profile to mess up the target's life (by sending abuse to their RL boss, asking their friends for nude pictures, etc). It's commonly done by controlling ex-lovers and sadistic teenagers.
The people calling Ero's games 'cyber bullying' belittles all the people that actually experience that sort of abuse, just like calling this '****' or 'torture' belittles people that have survived one or both of those. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=326497 --áPsychotic Monk for CSM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. If you want to mine in highsec, read www.minerbumping.com. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
635
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 04:01:00 -
[1825] - Quote
Shizuken wrote:Tor Norman wrote:
I am under the understanding that Ero always gets consent to broadcast the conversations. Just checked, after the first minute Ero clearly states that the conversation is being recorded and refers to an earlier conversation regarding the matter. It seems he didn't miss that important point this time.
You are correct, I went to listen to it again. I have retracted that part of my statement.
False.
1) There is no evidence that Sohkar had even entered the channel at that point or actually heard it 2) He says "EU-I-LA" Wtf is that. Never heard of it. 3) Sohkar at no point expresses consent to being recorded. 4) To prove implied consent, you have to include it expressly in the wording: "By participating in X, you consent to being recorded". All that implied consent does, is means the other party does not have to actually respond. It does not mean that you can imply that without including it implicitly in your wording. Cops say it like this, because many of the people they are questioning have no interest in answering ANYTHING, let alone giving consent if asked for it. The cops still have to state that the consent is implied. 5) At no point are rights given or asked for, to distribute the recording.
I swear, the more I learn about this "Bonus Room" stuff, the more disappointed I am by apparently what tards there are involved in orchestrating it. This is really amateur stuff. |

Xuixien
Attitude Adjustment Incorporated
857
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 04:02:00 -
[1826] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Teamspeak EULA
11. PROHIBITED CONDUCT
You represent and warrant that you will not violate any of the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and that:
You will not use TeamSpeak software to engage in or allow others to engage in any illegal activity.
And my job is done.
Damn.
Does Sokahr know you're about to get him banned from TeamSpeak? AUT5M - Active WH Corporation seeking new recruits. Frequent fleets, perfect boosts, material buyback, and more. Battleship/Logi/T3 pilots needed. Inquire within. Full API required. |

KnowUsByTheDead
Old Seers Of Arbitrary Stimulation
1063
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 04:02:00 -
[1827] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:KnowUsByTheDead wrote: Facts I applaud your effort to inject facts and reason into this thread. The sheeple have their ears plugged and eyes covered and their minds are set. Their cries are being heard by some small news sources already. Now, Ero1 will be used as a scapegoat, and CCP will ban him with little to no actual investigation, and Ripard will sit back with a smug look of superiority upon his face knowing he has abused his power as a member of CSM. His blog will gain followers, Eve will gain subs due to the publicity, and the bar will be lowered. Soon, the trolls of GD will be banned for "harassment and torture" by saying "INB4 the lock", and anything in Local chats other than "gf" will lead to account suspensions. Gankers and scammers will be permabanned, arenas will be set up for "PvP", we will shave off the sharp corners, round the edges, and pad the hard areas, replace the sand with non-toxic biodegradable playground sand-like materials, and the pandaverse will be complete. The NeX better start putting in pajamas and hot cocoa, because here comes the softer side of CCP, Pillow Fights Online.
I wonder...
How would Pillow Fights Online transfer into an Icelandic rap song?
Hmmmm......
 Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

PinkPanter
The Scope Gallente Federation
92
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 04:02:00 -
[1828] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Teamspeak EULA
11. PROHIBITED CONDUCT
You represent and warrant that you will not violate any of the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and that:
You will not use TeamSpeak software to engage in or allow others to engage in any illegal activity.
And my job is done.
****** proof translation:
Cyber bullying can land you a room in local prison these days. |

Michele Bachmann
Failed Diplomacy Failed-Diplomacy
27
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 04:02:00 -
[1829] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:KnowUsByTheDead wrote: Facts I applaud your effort to inject facts and reason into this thread. The sheeple have their ears plugged and eyes covered and their minds are set. Their cries are being heard by some small news sources already. Now, Ero1 will be used as a scapegoat, and CCP will ban him with little to no actual investigation, and Ripard will sit back with a smug look of superiority upon his face knowing he has abused his power as a member of CSM. His blog will gain followers, Eve will gain subs due to the publicity, and the bar will be lowered. Soon, the trolls of GD will be banned for "harassment and torture" by saying "INB4 the lock", and anything in Local chats other than "gf" will lead to account suspensions. Gankers and scammers will be permabanned, arenas will be set up for "PvP", we will shave off the sharp corners, round the edges, and pad the hard areas, replace the sand with non-toxic biodegradable playground sand-like materials, and the pandaverse will be complete. The NeX better start putting in pajamas and hot cocoa, because here comes the softer side of CCP, Pillow Fights Online. I laughed so hard, I urinated a few drips.
A few? I was going full blast |

Xander Delacroix
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 04:03:00 -
[1830] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:And Teamspeak is now aware of this issue as well.
Did you make threats of violence against them too, or do you only do that to EVE players?
You're just a broken record today aren't you? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 .. 254 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |