Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 28 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Sirinda
Ekchuah's Shrine Comporium
358
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 11:30:00 -
[241] - Quote
My Damnation will reap a bloody HAMvest with this.  |

Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
624
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 11:30:00 -
[242] - Quote
Michael Harari wrote:Rowells wrote: send out tackle, if they warp off then thats no different than now, however if you do get a successful tackle you can now be there for the kill quickly.
Except the first thing they are going to do once longpointed is activate their own mjds. then don't use a long point |

Pertuabo Enkidgan
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
80
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 11:33:00 -
[243] - Quote
ABC Easy as 1 2 3 Or simple as M M J D
|

Theon Severasse
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
68
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 11:39:00 -
[244] - Quote
Bad idea, while it will be tough to fit on a majority of BCs, ABCs will find it extremely easy to fit one, while sacrificing very little. Sniping fits that previously had an MWD on will be able to switch to these without really having to change anything about their fits. Unless the current problems with MJDs are fixed (Align, MJD, Warp) these should not even be close to being on the drawing board.
Battlecruisers (excluding ABCs) are in dire need of a buff, but this is not it. They currently cost about 3x that of a cruiser, and yet typically do not do more DPS, and have less maneuverability to boot. Lack of adequate powergrid/CPU compounds this problem. These are the problems that should be being dealt with, not adding in modules that make significant elements of the game irrelevant (Bubbles, Hic Points, Long Points, even Mobile MJDs). |

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
2139
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 11:42:00 -
[245] - Quote
I don't understand why people think BC's need a buff stats wise?
They are in a weird middle spot like dessies.. but they are still excellent bang for buck when you consider the dps/tank they bring to the field for that amount of isk. BYDI recruitment closed-ish |

Gregor Parud
496
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 11:47:00 -
[246] - Quote
Garviel Tarrant wrote:I don't understand why people think BC's need a buff stats wise?
They are in a weird middle spot like dessies.. but they are still excellent bang for buck when you consider the dps/tank they bring to the field for that amount of isk.
:)
|

Shade Millith
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
123
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 11:49:00 -
[247] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:CCP: "We're going to give BC a specific niche by giving it MJD because we feel that kiting (just like the old nano age and WCS) means that people can fight without having to commit to it, that's just not right given that these BC tend to be fairly slow compared to other ships. This way BC aren't able to keep up with fast roaming gangs but on the up side they can force you to commit to a fight if you want to kill them"
players: "YOU CAN'T DO THIS, THIS COMPLETELY MESSES UP MY BUBBLE/KITE err... THE GAME! DOOM, HORROR, CTHULHU AGAIN WTF"
Maybe people should be concerned when the ability to kite is being removed?
My favorite solo PVP ships are brawling BCs, and this change could benefit me greatly. I've already worked out a nice fit for a HAMDrake with a MWD and MMJD. Basically either you fly within range of my web/scram/730DPS/63kEHP and have a scram fitted, or I'm just simply going to leave when I wish to.
And yet I still don't think it's a good idea.
|

Adrie Atticus
The Shadow Plague Fidelas Constans
105
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 11:52:00 -
[248] - Quote
Medalyn Isis wrote:Arya Regnar wrote:Adrie Atticus wrote:MMJD should be affected by long points and bubbles.
Reasons for this are already posted. WORD Make it so longpoints and bubbles disrupt MMJD (except on deep space transports, they need some kind of edge since they are so useless). Please stop with these stupid knee jerk suggestions. You would break much more stuff than the imaginary problem you are trying to fix by doing something as stupid as this.
Break what? The module is not even implemented yet, there is nothing to break.
MEDIUM MJD should not be implemented in the first place. |

Tek Handle
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
52
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 11:54:00 -
[249] - Quote
If you introduce that module, you'll also have to give us a bubble variant which is able to hold them. Perhaps, a 5 minute cycle time but be able to fit a 2nd normal bubble to a Dictor, still. Seriously this module will totally imbalance Tier3 BCs. Another option would be to not allow Tier3 BCs to fit an MJD! You won't see Battleships in medium to large scale engagements anymore, because.. Tier3 BCs have likely the same damage and get an even easier GTFO option (added to their already great mobility), in fact they're decent right now so why give them such a huge advantage? MJD on a Command Ships or DSPT, good thing! |

Gregor Parud
496
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 11:55:00 -
[250] - Quote
Shade Millith wrote:Gregor Parud wrote:CCP: "We're going to give BC a specific niche by giving it MJD because we feel that kiting (just like the old nano age and WCS) means that people can fight without having to commit to it, that's just not right given that these BC tend to be fairly slow compared to other ships. This way BC aren't able to keep up with fast roaming gangs but on the up side they can force you to commit to a fight if you want to kill them"
players: "YOU CAN'T DO THIS, THIS COMPLETELY MESSES UP MY BUBBLE/KITE err... THE GAME! DOOM, HORROR, CTHULHU AGAIN WTF" Maybe people should be concerned when the ability to kite is being removed? My favorite solo PVP ships are brawling BCs, and this change could benefit me greatly. I've already worked out a nice fit for a HAMDrake with a MWD and MMJD. Basically either you fly within range of my web/scram/730DPS/63kEHP and have a scram fitted, or I'm just simply going to leave when I wish to. And yet I still don't think it's a good idea.
I'm not saying it's a buff the BC need but at the same time I can see the logic behind it. There's kity fast moving frigs and cruisers that can aggress and de-aggress at will, this makes slower ships pretty much useless and brings us back to square one. With this change BC will have their own form of kiting where faster cruisers have choice; avoid it or commit to the fight, and they HAVE that choice because a BC simply can't force themselves onto a frig or cruiser (assuming non-idiots). So it's a defensive measure where BC can go "sure I'm slower, but I'm still viable in my own right. You want to kill me? Come and get it".
It's a crude solution (where arguably none is needed) and possibly a precedent resulting in more and more MJD ships but from a strategy/gameplay POV it makes good sense. |
|

Lloyd Roses
Blue-Fire
592
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 12:00:00 -
[251] - Quote
MJD'ing railferoxes without regular propmod EVERYWHERE. That's what MJDs imply. "I honestly thought I was in lowsec"
|

Theon Severasse
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
68
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 12:04:00 -
[252] - Quote
Garviel Tarrant wrote:I don't understand why people think BC's need a buff stats wise?
They are in a weird middle spot like dessies.. but they are still excellent bang for buck when you consider the dps/tank they bring to the field for that amount of isk.
Really?
They don't do more DPS than cruisers, and don't really tank much more.
I can count on one hand the number of times I have seen someone flying a BC while soloing (not counting ABCs), and I can't remember the last time that I saw a fleet of BCs.
You can solo most BCs in a thorax without it being a particularly challenging fight. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
693
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 12:08:00 -
[253] - Quote
Theon Severasse wrote:Garviel Tarrant wrote:I don't understand why people think BC's need a buff stats wise?
They are in a weird middle spot like dessies.. but they are still excellent bang for buck when you consider the dps/tank they bring to the field for that amount of isk. Really? They don't do more DPS than cruisers, and don't really tank much more. I can count on one hand the number of times I have seen someone flying a BC while soloing (not counting ABCs), and I can't remember the last time that I saw a fleet of BCs. You can solo most BCs in a thorax without it being a particularly challenging fight.
you're making this up, aren't you. and unpopular doesn't mean bad. |

Laiannah Sahireen
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
75
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 12:23:00 -
[254] - Quote
Theon Severasse wrote:
They don't do more DPS than cruisers, and don't really tank much more.
I can count on one hand the number of times I have seen someone flying a BC while soloing (not counting ABCs), and I can't remember the last time that I saw a fleet of BCs.
You can solo most BCs in a thorax without it being a particularly challenging fight.
I recommend that you fit some battlecruisers and then do some PVP in EVE Online. This will allow you get some experience and avoid making clueless posts like this.
Tons of people use battlecruisers - solo and in gangs. Solo and small gang groups of cyclones/myrmidons are a scary thing, and perform very well with ancillary boosters/reppers.
I also hear that one or more people are fans of the Drake. |

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
2140
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 12:25:00 -
[255] - Quote
Theon Severasse wrote:Garviel Tarrant wrote:I don't understand why people think BC's need a buff stats wise?
They are in a weird middle spot like dessies.. but they are still excellent bang for buck when you consider the dps/tank they bring to the field for that amount of isk. Really? They don't do more DPS than cruisers, and don't really tank much more. I can count on one hand the number of times I have seen someone flying a BC while soloing (not counting ABCs), and I can't remember the last time that I saw a fleet of BCs. You can solo most BCs in a thorax without it being a particularly challenging fight.
BYDI recruitment closed-ish |

Gregor Parud
497
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 12:28:00 -
[256] - Quote
Theon Severasse wrote:Garviel Tarrant wrote:I don't understand why people think BC's need a buff stats wise?
They are in a weird middle spot like dessies.. but they are still excellent bang for buck when you consider the dps/tank they bring to the field for that amount of isk. Really? They don't do more DPS than cruisers, and don't really tank much more. I can count on one hand the number of times I have seen someone flying a BC while soloing (not counting ABCs), and I can't remember the last time that I saw a fleet of BCs. You can solo most BCs in a thorax without it being a particularly challenging fight.
"I Choose to only fight idiots and base my statements on those scenarios, also I exaggerate quite a bit".
|

Forlorn Wongraven
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
129
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 12:38:00 -
[257] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Battlecruisers have been a little overshadowed by battleships and cruisers in recent months and having the option to use MJDs combined with their dps and low cost should create some interesting chances for clever players to show off their abilities. The problem of BC is the OP status of bomber wings. BS can survive waves and cruisers can either run or are so cheap that it doesn't matter if they die. As long as the bomber squads are so effective a 3 min MJD with a 9.6 sec spool up time will not help the situation. Follow me on twitter: @ForlornW Follow my blog: http://crossingzebras.com/author/forlorn-wongraven |

Claud Tiberius
37
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 12:53:00 -
[258] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Battlecruisers, BC's
reading, folks. It does help.
any of you picturing quick jumps to get those darn snipers 100km off the gate?
m You just blew my mind. Once upon a time the Golem had a Raven hull and it looked good. Then it transformed into a plataduck. The end. |

Spugg Galdon
APOCALYPSE LEGION The Obsidian Front
444
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 13:00:00 -
[259] - Quote
Wow. Just wow!
This is the best thread that has ever existed.
The nonsensical tears are so so sweet.
I want this to go on and on.
I'm gonna make some more popcorn, light the bbq and take my laptop outside with a beer to watch this thread as it is so ******* entertaining.
[On Topic Bit]
These modules are a good idea.
**Spugg Galdon lathers himself in flame retardant semen |

Gerdan BloodELF
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
15
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 13:00:00 -
[260] - Quote
Not a huge fan of this module to be honest. Kind of helps kill off even further something that I love which is range control ships such as vagabonds. Please reconsider these changes. |
|

Rainbow Eyes
Sora no Otoshimano
6
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 13:03:00 -
[261] - Quote
Hey, DEVs, what do you think about interdiction of warp for Tier3? 10sec and we at 80km from bubble, one the optimal. We can refain our Interdictors and HD? Big difference between MJD on BS and BC, Tier3 have comparative mobility with Cruisers. That for mania with new modules, especially with MJD? MJD have no counter-measures, don't speak to me about scram and that I will burst out laughing
/Vanga mode on: again there will be one roams from Naga`s/Tornado, only now not audible... |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1369
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 13:03:00 -
[262] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:CCP: "We're going to nerf mobility on BC because atm they're way too powerful and make the pvp landscape rather limited and boring"
players: "YOU CAN'T DO THIS, IT WILL COMPLETELY MESS UP MY CANE BACKBONE... err THE GAME! DOOM, HORROR, CTHULHU. YOU'll BREAK THIS GAME SO MUCH IT'S NOT EVEN FUNNY BECAUSE I CAN'T COMPREHEND THE RESULTS OF THIS CHANGE AND COMING UP WITH ADAPTATIONS SOUNDS LIKE EFFORT!"
:changes happen, some time passes and ppl adapt:
players: "hey, this is actually nice. Now we can fly funky cruisers and frigs because they're not made redundant anymore by Canes and Drakes. Pretty cool tbh"
CCP: "We're going to give BC a specific niche by giving it MJD because we feel that kiting (just like the old nano age and WCS) means that people can fight without having to commit to it, that's just not right given that these BC tend to be fairly slow compared to other ships. This way BC aren't able to keep up with fast roaming gangs but on the up side they can force you to commit to a fight if you want to kill them"
players: "YOU CAN'T DO THIS, THIS COMPLETELY MESSES UP MY BUBBLE/KITE err... THE GAME! DOOM, HORROR, CTHULHU AGAIN WTF"
people who have a clue: "well, it's a bit weird but sure, I can see where you're going with that but please, CBC only. Not ABC"
History repeats itself, again and again.
The fact aht we addapted doe snto mean that now is better than before.
And The constant nerfign of ANY tactic that is not gallente in the face blaster brwaling is gettign tiresome.
If in the face brwaling is supposed to be the ONLY way to play.. why would anyone have any other race trained?
"If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Spugg Galdon
APOCALYPSE LEGION The Obsidian Front
444
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 13:05:00 -
[263] - Quote
Rainbow Eyes wrote:Hey, DEVs, what do you think about interdiction of warp for Tier3? 10sec and we at 80km from bubble, one the optimal. We can refain our Interdictors and HD? Big difference between MJD on BS and BC, Tier3 have comparative mobility with Cruisers. That for mania with new modules, especially with MJD? MJD have no counter-measures, don't speak to me about scram and that I will burst out laughing  /Vanga mode on: again there will be one roams from Naga`s/Tornado, only now not audible...
Have I had too many beers? This makes no sense! |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1369
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 13:05:00 -
[264] - Quote
Gerdan BloodELF wrote:Not a huge fan of this module to be honest. Kind of helps kill off even further something that I love which is range control ships such as vagabonds. Please reconsider these changes.
it helps kill any combat where the players need to use the brains. It was OK on battleships because battleships were nearly useless and needed tha help. But BC are not used for a SIGNLE reason. TOO SLOW WARP. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Spugg Galdon
APOCALYPSE LEGION The Obsidian Front
445
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 13:07:00 -
[265] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:
The fact aht we addapted doe snto mean that now is better than before.
And The constant nerfign of ANY tactic that is not gallente in the face blaster brwaling is gettign tiresome.
If in the face brwaling is supposed to be the ONLY way to play.. why would anyone have any other race trained?
Auto cannons, Blasters and HAM's (even drones are good vs hard tackled ships) are really good within scram/web range. I can think of many ships that use these and most aren't Gallente |

Lucas Genos
S T R A T C O M Critical-Mass
1
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 13:09:00 -
[266] - Quote
To all the crybabies: Go to EFT and make a copy of your favorite CBC fit. Now replace one of your midslots with a T2 medium MWD (mMJD uses one more CPU). Now downgrade your guns and/or tank to make it actually fit. Now compare your old fit with your new fit. Now notice it has less utility, tank and/o gank. Now realize it won't be OP. Now stop crying.
To CCP: ABCs don't actually need to make a lot of sacrifices besides an utility med and some ACR rigs. To stop ABCs from potentially break, and to keep the same ratios, I strongly recommend you reduce jump range and spool-up time by 25-50%. This would give it around the same align:spool-up and lockrange:jumprange as battleships, be less OP for ABCs and equally or more useful for CBCs. |

Gregor Parud
499
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 13:12:00 -
[267] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:The fact aht we addapted doe snto mean that now is better than before.
And The constant nerfign of ANY tactic that is not gallente in the face blaster brwaling is gettign tiresome.
If in the face brwaling is supposed to be the ONLY way to play.. why would anyone have any other race trained?
Yes, it is better because there's more diversity. If you can't see that you were part of the problem
Nice strawman, it's not the only way to play but it will be the way to play if you want to attack a BC, assuming he fitted MJD.
|

Spugg Galdon
APOCALYPSE LEGION The Obsidian Front
445
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 13:12:00 -
[268] - Quote
Lucas Genos wrote:To all the crybabies: Go to EFT and make a copy of your favorite CBC fit. Now replace one of your midslots with a T2 medium MWD (mMJD uses one more CPU). Now downgrade your guns and/or tank to make it actually fit. Now compare your old fit with your new fit. Now notice it has less utility, tank and/o gank. Now realize it won't be OP. Now stop crying.
To CCP: ABCs don't actually need to make a lot of sacrifices besides an utility med and some ACR rigs. To stop ABCs from potentially break, and to keep the same ratios, I strongly recommend you reduce jump range and spool-up time by 25-50%. This would give it around the same align:spool-up and lockrange:jumprange as battleships, be less OP for ABCs and equally or more useful for CBCs.
The above is one of the few posts that makes sense in this thread.
It's basically what I've been doing this afternoon. Trying to shoehorn this module in is difficult without making some kind of sacrifice. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1369
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 13:12:00 -
[269] - Quote
Spugg Galdon wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:
The fact aht we addapted doe snto mean that now is better than before.
And The constant nerfign of ANY tactic that is not gallente in the face blaster brwaling is gettign tiresome.
If in the face brwaling is supposed to be the ONLY way to play.. why would anyone have any other race trained?
Auto cannons, Blasters and HAM's (even drones are good vs hard tackled ships) are really good within scram/web range. I can think of many ships that use these and most aren't Gallente
You seriously typed that?
Isn't obvious that when I said gallente I was talking about blasters?
And no These other weapons are NEARLY IRRELEVANT comapred to blasters at scram range.
Scram range is not the only way to play this damm game!! Why in hell we have so many wepaosn that fire further than 9 km? "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1369
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 13:15:00 -
[270] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:The fact aht we addapted doe snto mean that now is better than before.
And The constant nerfign of ANY tactic that is not gallente in the face blaster brwaling is gettign tiresome.
If in the face brwaling is supposed to be the ONLY way to play.. why would anyone have any other race trained?
Yes, it is better because there's more diversity. If you can't see that you were part of the problem Nice strawman, it's not the only way to play but it will be the way to play if you want to attack a BC, assuming he fitted MJD.
Great nonsense you spewed. Ibasically did nto flew BC. And no we do nto have more diversity now. The diversity of things we kill in high sec (and we are among the ones that kill the most ) droped DRAMATICALLy in the last 1 year.
There is no reason to use anything larger than a Cruiser in small scale warfare now. Peopel in fact use mostly T3 with warp speed increase because warp speed is one of the most relevant things in game now! "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 28 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |