They have a fix as it will require a full new build they got to combine it with the current sisi build and test all fixes before deploy if it was not the weekend it would be fixed to morrow best quess monday.

Ok, CCP has said that somewhere?! Linky pls!
A good idea would be to test a release a bit more BEFORE rolling it out to tens of thousands of players...

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=722859#post722859
Looking at dev posts once in a while does wonders.

So am I the only one who thinks the new ability to move drones directly from cargo to drone bay is a balancing issue?

That's probably because not everyone has noticed yet. When Assault Frig fights start never running out of drones, when everyone and their mother's PVP fit includes ECM and damage specific drones, people will start realizing that the one advantage Gallente ships had, now everyone has. Making Gallente even more useless then the extreme fail they already are.

Think we can get our Gallente SP back CCP? That'd be nice.

At the very least, ships w/ drone cargo perks should get something in place of it. Drone speed maybe?

3) CCP failing to honor flat out statements/commitments.

Statements: "Incarna / new in station behavior will be optional on initial deployment." and
"New Neocom will be optional on initial deployment."

Delivery: "You *will* exit the ship on every dock into the new render intensive station environment." and
"Here's the new Neocom. Oooh! Isn't it pretty?"
.

Nit pick here, no where did they say that it would be optional.

OK, I've finally finished reading this thread.

My impression is not favorable. In fact, it is starting to drift back to this Summer's level of satisfaction.

1) Only trivial responses from Devs in this thread. This again creates the impression that, just as on Sisi, it isn't worth one's time to give feedback.

2) The Neocom changes, as with Incarna, seem to reflect an attitude of "we will make it prettier and to hell with how it affects game play". With *many* of the Neocom changes this is obvious. E.g., swapping location of ships and items icons arbitrarily, often used benign button immediately adjacent to dangerous undock button, removing date and stating that 'well, you can click to bring up the calendar, examine it, then close that window' as if that was just as convenient as merely glancing at bottom left, infamous Chat button, and on and on.

3) CCP failing to honor flat out statements/commitments.

Statements: "Incarna / new in station behavior will be optional on initial deployment." and
"New Neocom will be optional on initial deployment."

Delivery: "You *will* exit the ship on every dock into the new render intensive station environment." and
"Here's the new Neocom. Oooh! Isn't it pretty?"

4) Not even bothering to float the new item names past a customer review panel. The wrongness of many of the new names are clear and don't border on, they are, incompetent.


CCP, you made major changes in attitude and tone leading up to Crucible. With 1.1.1 you appear to be drifting off course again. Not surprising. When you've been sailing in the wrong direction for so long it is going to take sharp discipline to ensure the ship doesn't drift into a wrong tack again.

Bottom line: CCP needs to perform a lessons learned with the 1.1.1/Neocom patch and ask themselves why it hasn't been as well received as 1.0 and 1.1. Regarding both content of the delivery and post delivery communication with the players.

We gotta remember that most of the teams really have stepped up... The obvious flaws in this patch mostly go to team Optimal (Team Pink Zombies) and Team Namechangers whatever their call sign might be. Let's not lynch the entire CCP crew yet. Dunno wtf those guys are thinking...

And I agree that this feels just like on "old times". No one even bothers to come and say "hey yea we messed up and working towards rollback / fixes now - will tell u guys more in few days.". Naa... That would be too much to ask for.

Now we just sit here and wonder will next step be more force fed bull junk or perhaps some minor tweaks to fix couple worst screw ups leaving the end product to sub standard quality as a whole.

I honestly don't have faith that they would actually fix anything properly any more.

So, yeah, I'm not going to read all of this, but could we please have it so that only minimised windows show on the neocom? I don't need an icon there for my cargo or the scanner when they are open. Other windows like overview and selected item behaves like you would expect so can the rest please follow suit?

May I suggest a simple solution?

Dissolve the CSM. Replace them with a "Poll " function utility in the forums. CCP can then read the results of PLAYER proposed polls, as well as there own, and get a more accurate gauge of player response to a particular issue without CCP having to read through an entire thread.This will give CCP more immediate and more accurate feedback better enabling them to make sound decisions for themselves and serving the communities wants and needs as well.

I'm glad that now everytime I open the scanner I now get a button telling me that I did in fact just open the scanner and its not some aberration before my eyes.

Bonus points for CCP for fixing the blue i's and dumping in a grey box like thing to represent the scanner which is pretty much constantly up for me. Art department must've been stumped on how to represent a radar like device with a small icon.....

-snip- Give it some time.

Isn't it ridiculous that something as oft used as the scanner was overlooked in development?? It's like the Dev's never undocked with the code. Or if they did, they didn't do anything that a vast majority of the players do every day. Even a smidgen of QA, formal or informal, should have caught this.

I have lost 5b isk because of the format changes. Guess thats a super localization feature but for me it was just some kind of a scam.

I have changed one of my market orders yesterday and typed in 3000.02 isk. I'm doing this fast as allways cause i'm used to it. But my english client (located in europe) doesnt like (.) point anymore. He expected a (,) comma. What happend? Yeah, my marked order was 300002 isk. Great, it was immediately fullfiled. I paid 5b isk instead of 50m isk.

Well done CCP! Guess it's time now for another game.

cu and hf!

Thanks for getting into touch.

I am afraid that we could not reverse the transaction, as it has already been completed. You will have to contact the seller yourself if you want your ISK back.

I have petitioned it and that was the answer:



What a suggestion, wow! You really give me such an advice in a game where scams and infiltration is part of the game mechanics? You even show us videos about those evil options and now you are telling me, that I should just ask somebody to give me back 5b isk cause of an issue you are responsible for?

Nice customer care and with that comment you have lost a player!

Just fyi, a couple of month ago a GM mailed me in game that he "stole" a nyx blueprint out of my lab (it was in research) because the guy who sold me the BPO betrayed his corp. He logged on with someones account which had the right permissions and stole the bpo from the corp hanger, than sold it to me.
The GM gave me the money back. I wasn't happy but ok, havn't lost anything at least.

This was some kind of an account sharing problem and you were able to fix it!!!
Now it's a prob because of game changes and so it's impossible for you (CCP) to reverse the transaction? Fool someone else, please ...

Isn't it ridiculous that something as oft used as the scanner was overlooked in development?? It's like the Dev's never undocked with the code. Or if they did, they didn't do anything that a vast majority of the players do every day. Even a smidgen of QA, formal or informal, should have caught this.