Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 49 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |

Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
426
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 12:43:00 -
[391] - Quote
Luke Hammarskjold wrote:I really liked the phoon before, but with the reduced drone capabilities I dont think it will be so awesome... We can try to convience CCP to keep fundamentals of faction versions of Phoon and Domi as they are though. |

Sunuva Gunn
Glowing Goat Black Fence.
9
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 13:01:00 -
[392] - Quote
Barrogh Habalu wrote:Luke Hammarskjold wrote:I really liked the phoon before, but with the reduced drone capabilities I dont think it will be so awesome... We can try to convience CCP to keep fundamentals of faction versions of Phoon and Domi as they are though.
A good idea.
Alternatively we could ask them to leave them as they are and add the "Typhoon II" and "Type B Dominix"... Even looking the same it'd stop the whinging in its tracks.
|

SMT008
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
558
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 13:08:00 -
[393] - Quote
Sunuva Gunn wrote:I never had an issue with it. (Edit: The projectile/missile/drone split, that is)
Sure, you can still throw loads of weapons on a ship and get some DPS out of it. What I mean is that, first, you need a massive amount of SPs and second, you need to mix damagemods (or have low-DPS weapons)
The Minmatar Republic just thought it would be better to overhaul the Typhoon into a missile platform, so that the pilots aren't forced to train for everything at once.
Sunuva Gunn wrote:I'd rather they just look at the Raven, rather than turn the Phoon into a cookie-cutter of it.
Previously, there were no armor/missile boat. Now there's one. Not a bad thing tbh.
Sunuva Gunn wrote:Simply that, whilst giving you the new ship with one hand, they're taking away the old one with the other.
That is called "Changing things".
Quote:One remarks: for whose who say : if you want to go for missiles use a raven, we do not need an armor raven ... well i need to tank armor and to launch missiles, my personnals stats, and others (from jalmon as example) shows it is more than a viable option ...
Indeed. We need an armor ship that throw missiles. Maybe not "We need", more like "It would be fun to".
Tbh, the problem with the Typhoon being worse than the new Armageddon comes from the Armageddon itself. Less damage should come from its highslots. As in, reduce how many highslots it has. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction Whores in space
113
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 13:10:00 -
[394] - Quote
Sunuva Gunn wrote:Barrogh Habalu wrote:Luke Hammarskjold wrote:I really liked the phoon before, but with the reduced drone capabilities I dont think it will be so awesome... We can try to convience CCP to keep fundamentals of faction versions of Phoon and Domi as they are though. A good idea. Alternatively we could ask them to leave them as they are and add the "Typhoon II" and "Type B Dominix"... Even looking the same it'd stop the whinging in its tracks.
balance and happyness wise that would be the best . But would impact economy, database etc.. and this team might not have authority to do so by themselves. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1282
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 13:15:00 -
[395] - Quote
Icarius wrote:Again, the 5th medium slot ... is useless, you will not have enough cpu that's all.
you won't have the 24 cpu for a TP, making your torps more useful against different sizes of ships?
Steve Ronuken for CSM 8 Handy tools and SDE conversions Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Sunuva Gunn
Glowing Goat Black Fence.
9
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 13:18:00 -
[396] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Sunuva Gunn wrote:Barrogh Habalu wrote:Luke Hammarskjold wrote:I really liked the phoon before, but with the reduced drone capabilities I dont think it will be so awesome... We can try to convience CCP to keep fundamentals of faction versions of Phoon and Domi as they are though. A good idea. Alternatively we could ask them to leave them as they are and add the "Typhoon II" and "Type B Dominix"... Even looking the same it'd stop the whinging in its tracks. balance and happyness wise that would be the best . But would impact economy, database etc.. and this team might not have authority to do so by themselves.
It's going to change the economy anyway. Typhoons will rise in price as they get easier and require less skill to pilot.
As for the database, only the people involved can tell us that, and they won't think to say if we don't ask them first.
I don't think that a single "Mk 2" Battleship per faction would hurt (They wouldn't require any new models or skins, which is nice), but it would, in theory, make everyone happy. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction Whores in space
113
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 13:36:00 -
[397] - Quote
Sunuva Gunn wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:Sunuva Gunn wrote:Barrogh Habalu wrote:Luke Hammarskjold wrote:I really liked the phoon before, but with the reduced drone capabilities I dont think it will be so awesome... We can try to convience CCP to keep fundamentals of faction versions of Phoon and Domi as they are though. A good idea. Alternatively we could ask them to leave them as they are and add the "Typhoon II" and "Type B Dominix"... Even looking the same it'd stop the whinging in its tracks. balance and happyness wise that would be the best . But would impact economy, database etc.. and this team might not have authority to do so by themselves. It's going to change the economy anyway. Typhoons will rise in price as they get easier and require less skill to pilot. As for the database, only the people involved can tell us that, and they won't think to say if we don't ask them first. I don't think that a single "Mk 2" Battleship per faction would hurt (They wouldn't require any new models or skins, which is nice), but it would, in theory, make everyone happy.
I mean the population of blueprints etc... need to make a new insurance price evaluation etc... |

Sunuva Gunn
Glowing Goat Black Fence.
9
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 13:50:00 -
[398] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:
I mean the population of blueprints etc... need to make a new insurance price evaluation etc...
Surely they'll have to make the new insurance price evaluation for -all- the re-balanced ships anyway? The unchanged versions would be the only ones that wouldn't need it. :P
As for the blueprints, retire the old ones to LP stores? |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction Whores in space
113
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 13:51:00 -
[399] - Quote
Sunuva Gunn wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:
I mean the population of blueprints etc... need to make a new insurance price evaluation etc...
Surely they'll have to make the new insurance price evaluation for -all- the re-balanced ships anyway? The unchanged versions would be the only ones that wouldn't need it. :P As for the blueprints, retire the old ones to LP stores?
Easy for you to say. But as I said.. maybe they do not have the authority to decide that only inside the balance team. |

Akturous
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
104
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 13:56:00 -
[400] - Quote
SMT008 wrote:Sure, you can still throw loads of weapons on a ship and get some DPS out of it. What I mean is that, first, you need a massive amount of SPs and second, you need to mix damagemods (or have low-DPS weapons) The Minmatar Republic just thought it would be better to overhaul the Typhoon into a missile platform, so that the pilots aren't forced to train for everything at once. Sunuva Gunn wrote:I'd rather they just look at the Raven, rather than turn the Phoon into a cookie-cutter of it. Previously, there were no armor/missile boat. Now there's one. Not a bad thing tbh. That is called "Changing things". Indeed. We need an armor ship that throw missiles. Maybe not "We need", more like "It would be fun to".
Except, those of us that trained projectiles...for you know Minmatar...lose a ship, so I'm forced to train them if I want that and my cyclone back. If they gave it navy scythe bonuses, it'd keep everyone happy.
Vote Item Heck One for CSM8 |
|

Pattern Clarc
Aperture Harmonics
468
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 13:58:00 -
[401] - Quote
Nope. Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. Gallente - Pilot satisfaction |

Kaz Mafaele
EVE University Ivy League
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 13:58:00 -
[402] - Quote
Everything looks good and that certainly includes the phoon but it sure would be nice to be able to field a full flight of heavy drones still. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7433
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 14:01:00 -
[403] - Quote
RIP discophoon mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Cy4nid3
Nordgoetter Test Alliance Please Ignore
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 14:08:00 -
[404] - Quote
Quote:Luke Hammarskjold wrote: I really liked the phoon before, but with the reduced drone capabilities I dont think it will be so awesome...
I like new Phoon. U already tried some fittings ? Smaller dronebay isn't really a problem. Ur main damage are the launchers now and with torps u get a massive anmount of DPS and volley. U can still deploy up to 4 Sentry drones which further raise DPS and they should be able as well to kill NPC frigs as long as they're not tooo close. The Phoon's high velocity is an other great condition for torp fittings combinet with small + med drones against frigs and cruisers. If u further use an armor tanked fit u have enough med slots for TPs , propmods, cap rechargers ... And last but not least u still have an empty highslot for vamps or cap transfers (if u fly with 2 accs).
Imo the phoon will raise to one of the best PVE T1 BS after the change assumed torps won't get completly nerfed with the announced BS missile rebalance. |

TheFace Asano
Deadly Execution
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 14:16:00 -
[405] - Quote
Is there a reason that the new Navy BC's have more raw hp than the attack BS?
Tempest: Give it one more low maybe, I use the fleet already and it works well with the 7 lows.
Mael: Works well, but I would still give it a tad more shield hp.
Phoon: Give it back some of the drone bay, at least 125 (150) to carry a full load of heavy/sentries and a spare rack of lights. No other Minnie BS has the option with the changes. |

Wrayeth
Inexorable Retribution
60
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 15:53:00 -
[406] - Quote
As an attack battleship, the tempest's damage output is a bit anemic. I'd really like to see it gain a 7th turret slot and the fittings to use it. If this doesn't happen, the tempest will be "meh" compared to the attack ships of the other races as well as its same-race competitor, the typhoon.
If it does happen, the tempest will again become what it once was back before 2007 and will fit the Minmatar mold of (paraphrased since I don't remember the exact quote) "flying Minmatar is like riding a chair down the stairs while firing an uzi" (i.e. speed, damage, sub-par defenses). |

Dredastttarm
Liberalitatibus
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 16:35:00 -
[407] - Quote
Anyone else think that maybe the Minmatar should have 2 attack battleships and 1 combat battleship? Wouldn't that make more sense for the Minmatar? Also, I am completely pissed about the phoon becoming another Caldari ship... Don't we have enough shield/missile ships already? |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction Whores in space
116
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 16:36:00 -
[408] - Quote
Dredastttarm wrote:Anyone else think that maybe the Minmatar should have 2 attack battleships and 1 combat battleship? Wouldn't that make more sense for the Minmatar? Also, I am completely pissed about the phoon becoming another Caldari ship... Don't we have enough shield/missile ships already?
Dude... you are days late.. they aready changed into 2 attack and 1 combat. |

Shingorash
S T R A T C O M THORN Alliance
37
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 16:37:00 -
[409] - Quote
Dredastttarm wrote:Anyone else think that maybe the Minmatar should have 2 attack battleships and 1 combat battleship? Wouldn't that make more sense for the Minmatar? Also, I am completely pissed about the phoon becoming another Caldari ship... Don't we have enough shield/missile ships already?
Its actually pretty damn good if you mess with the fittings. It does however need its full Drone bay back and the turrets removed. Its pointless having the unbonused turrets on it. |

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
148
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 16:38:00 -
[410] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Pattern Clarc wrote:Maelstrom: No change: OK Tempest: A little on the slow side or should become a real shield tanker with 7/6/6 Typhoon: Pretty good so far, maybe a little bit more grid/fittings.
Either way, drastic changes from this point would probably upset more people than they would please. Just tweaks needed I think. To be frank I stil woudl prefer tempest as 7/5/7 because then we have an oficial armor tanker (I suspect the phoon will be used much more as a shield FAT BC / FAT stealth bomber.
It's a sad state of affairs when every one wants to shield tank everything because armor tanking is sub-par now a days in most realms. Even in the Gallente thread the calls to shield tank the mega makes my skin crawl but can I really blame them? As I stated before I would love a 7/5/7 armor pest, but that is more of a want rather than an element of balance or rather I can't out right say it needs it.
Especially since the stats of the other battleships still seem to be in flux. What I can say is I don't think the mega should be faster than the tempest. The same perhaps but not faster. |
|

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance 24eme Legion Etrangere
106
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 16:41:00 -
[411] - Quote
TheFace Asano wrote:Is there a reason that the new Navy BC's have more raw hp than the attack BS?
yeah, the price tag. |

Ersahi Kir
Freelance Mining Company
95
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 16:43:00 -
[412] - Quote
Dredastttarm wrote:Anyone else think that maybe the Minmatar should have 2 attack battleships and 1 combat battleship? Wouldn't that make more sense for the Minmatar? Also, I am completely pissed about the phoon becoming another Caldari ship... Don't we have enough shield/missile ships already?
|

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction Whores in space
116
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 16:46:00 -
[413] - Quote
Krell Kroenen wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:Pattern Clarc wrote:Maelstrom: No change: OK Tempest: A little on the slow side or should become a real shield tanker with 7/6/6 Typhoon: Pretty good so far, maybe a little bit more grid/fittings.
Either way, drastic changes from this point would probably upset more people than they would please. Just tweaks needed I think. To be frank I stil woudl prefer tempest as 7/5/7 because then we have an oficial armor tanker (I suspect the phoon will be used much more as a shield FAT BC / FAT stealth bomber. It's a sad state of affairs when every one wants to shield tank everything because armor tanking is sub-par now a days in most realms. Even in the Gallente thread the calls to shield tank the mega makes my skin crawl but can I really blame them? As I stated before I would love a 7/5/7 armor pest, but that is more of a want rather than an element of balance or rather I can't out right say it needs it. Especially since the stats of the other battleships still seem to be in flux. What I can say is I don't think the mega should be faster than the tempest. The same perhaps but not faster, the mega already sports more dps and tank it shouldn't outclass the tempest in all realms.
To be fair.. current tempest proposl has MORE tank thatn current mega proposal. Only the mega low slots cancel that completely. And taht is the problem |

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
149
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:06:00 -
[414] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote: To be fair.. current tempest proposl has MORE tank thatn current mega proposal. Only the mega low slots cancel that completely. And taht is the problem
I was thinking of the 8 lows on the mega when I made my post perhaps I shouldn't have. So what do you think the problem is really and what is your solution to it? |

Prometheus Exenthal
mnemonic.
558
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:36:00 -
[415] - Quote
The previous Tempest iteration was better than what's up here now. The people complaining about the signature radius are high. Now the ship is woefully inadequate compared to every other BS. -áwww.promsrage.com |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction Whores in space
116
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:48:00 -
[416] - Quote
Prometheus Exenthal wrote:The previous Tempest iteration was better than what's up here now. The people complaining about the signature radius are high. Now the ship is woefully inadequate compared to every other BS.
You are the one high. The 2 secodns extra that other battleships take to lock a tempest provide WAY more Effective hitpoints thatn the little bit it lost. Its very adequate for qhen you want to oerate in an attack role, kill somethign and get out. Very minmatar and much more interesting that simply having more HP taht is a role the tempest would ALWAYS loose to the abaddon. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction Whores in space
116
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:01:00 -
[417] - Quote
Krell Kroenen wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote: To be fair.. current tempest proposl has MORE tank thatn current mega proposal. Only the mega low slots cancel that completely. And taht is the problem
I was thinking of the 8 lows on the mega when I made my post perhaps I shouldn't have. So what do you think the problem is really and what is your solution to it?
My opinion is that EVE has become a specialization game. That means you must be good at something that is your focus.
The tempest is simply stuck into 2 bonuses that do the same thing but still not well enough to compensate its 6 turrets and low drone bay size AND lack of enough low slots to fit tank and several damage modules. its a counter productive ship. All tis bonus goes to damage but all its slots layout produces is a subpar shield tanker or a n armor tanker without possibility for enough damage.
The fact that 1 damage mod makes MORE DIFFERENCE than 1 of the tempest bonus is the reason for that. the tempest with only 1 bonus but +1 free low slot would be STRONGER than it currently is.
Tempest would need a 7th low to compete directly with the megatron in a combat scenario usign its current bonuses. That means -1H +1 low
Or it can be made even more minmatar. Reduce tempest to 7k/7k/6.5k. increase its speed to 125ms. Increase its agility to .11
Or you can make the tempest into a different boat. I would love a really different ship. Something like 7.5% rof per level and 15% AB bonus per level (and reduce its mass to close to megathron levels) . I know its niche, but its very minmatar and would not need any slot changes.
There are lot of options, but the real issue of the tempest is related to its slot layout being inefficient for a damage focused ship ( taking from 2 damage bonus on the hull).
If i was to redesign the minmatar line as a whole. I would have made almost the same typhoon as rise. But would have changed the other 2. Would have made the maelstrom 5% rof 10% hitpoint of shield per level. Slow.. a true SHIP OF THE LINE. Would have made the tempest a 7.5% rof and 7.5% shield boost per level and 7/6/6 or 8/6/5, 100mbit bay. But faster than any battleship But the typhoon. |

Junko Sideswipe
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
130
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:04:00 -
[418] - Quote
I liked the tempest sig at 420.  Confederation of xXPIZZAXx CEO Watch PIZZA Videos http://www.youtube.com/user/LunchSquad |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction Whores in space
117
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:09:00 -
[419] - Quote
Junko Sideswipe wrote:I liked the tempest sig at 420. 
Trolling is not helpful. |

Junko Sideswipe
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
130
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:15:00 -
[420] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Trolling is not helpful.
Wasn't trolling, I liked it.
Phoon was fine with just torps, I liked that idea a lot. The majority of people in the thread don't even know how missiles, especially torps, actually work in the game, so they hurf blurf about it. Confederation of xXPIZZAXx CEO Watch PIZZA Videos http://www.youtube.com/user/LunchSquad |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 49 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |