instead some are saying how the victim should be punished instead

not in the slightest.
there's a vast difference between he can't escape, and he didn't want to escape.

You don't think people should be punished for making RL death threats?

Legal definition

Cyberbullying is defined in legal glossaries as

-actions that use information and communication technologies to support deliberate, repeated, and hostile behavior by an individual or group, that is intended to harm another or others.
-use of communication technologies for the intention of harming another person
-use of internet service and mobile technologies such as web pages and discussion groups as well as instant messaging or SMS text messaging with the intention of harming another person.

Examples of what constitutes cyberbullying include communications that seek to intimidate, control, manipulate, put down, falsely discredit, or humiliate the recipient. The actions are deliberate, repeated, and hostile behavior intended to harm another.

Why are people even siding with this *******? (the scammers)

are people just ignoring that they just went off and did the most **** move imaginable and instead some are saying how the victim should be punished instead

you do realize people make death threats in games every day right?

I think you get it.

It's not about slamming a ban on anyone. It's more about saying "Not comfortable with this - tone it down" - it reflects on their product.

After that - up to CCP. I stated before that I didn't think Erotica1 should be banned. It's up to CCP to define the line that can be crossed. Whether this is it is for them to choose. For me it crossed that line. Not my bag to make that decision/

Massve difference between being so invested that he didn't feel that he could escape without losing stuff that he was emotionally invested in.

Once that had been stripped a further hour and a half was completely not needed.

It was clear he was in distress and yet it carried on. You still haven't answered that issue.

because it seems a third of the player base of eve are sociopaths, and a vocal minority - outright sadists, thats why.....


If I was CCP, I would boot E1 & Co. and pass therir IPs to law enforcement.

I had several people send me death threats for over a week when we ran the mining interdictions. There is never an excuse for unironic racism or death threats over a game.

because it seems a third of the player base of eve are sociopaths, and a vocal minority - outright sadists, thats why.....


If I was CCP, I would boot E1 & Co. and pass therir IPs to law enforcement.

So start the Extradition Orders for all the various countries that were involved in this hostile behavior.

Good thing CCP is more neutral then you.

I completely agree with you. No need. I also don't find the need to humiliate someone for a long time having stripped them of their assets, until they completely lose it and are obviously in distress, necessary either. To then glorify it and put it out for general consumption shows a kind of callousness I haven't seen before in this game.

Line overstepped in this instance.

and would you be banning the racist, too?

the difference is irrelevant, he could have still left whenever the hell he pleased.

and people are casually ignoring that he's a racist that threatens people, they still haven't accepted that fact.

Losing your 'assets' in EVE is the equivalent of like losing a game of Monopoly. (Assets in EVE have no value, and CCP can take them away at any time for any reason.)

Quiz Time:
You are down to a few hundred Monopoly dollars - and most of your properties are already mortgaged.
You, sadly, land on Park Place - upon which your opponent has a hotel.

Do you:

A) Thank your opponent for a well played match and take your leave?
B) Flip the board and refuse to play ever again?
C) Freak out. Cause your wife to freak out. Call your opponent the 'N-word' and threaten to kill him?

Most 'sane' people choose A.
Losing the bonus round, while regrettable, should be handled with a modicum of sportsmanship and class, just as in Monopoly.

Instead, as the Soundcloud clearly shows - Sohkar chose 'C'.

Sane? I'll leave that to the reader.
But people are actually suggesting that EROTICA 1 'overstepped the line' and deserves sanction?
If anything, he was the victim.

Why are people even siding with this *******? (the scammers)

are people just ignoring that they just went off and did the most **** move imaginable and instead some are saying how the victim should be punished instead

I do realise this. In fact, I've had more than one directed at me for perfectly acceptable things, like ganking and bumping. You didn't answer my question, however.

My mom is dead sadly, but wife spit coffee out through her nose she was laughing so hard. My 2 teenage sons thought it was pretty funny too. My daughter laughed, but being only 2 I think she was mostly mimicking us.

But then again, my wife isn't a pc busybody tool who constantly has her panties in a bunch over **** other people do. Maybe you should remarry?

Sane? I'll leave that to the reader.

I bet you took great satisfaction in reporting them. You have also reported people for spawning Concord during your interdictions,

I bet you took great satisfaction in reporting them.

You have also reported people for spawning Concord during your interdictions

I mean here is the big bad Goon

You and your ilk go to great lengths to push the rules envelope to get your "fun" but you can be very sensitive when a *shudder* rule is violated.

I'm sure you felt very threatened when you got the threats, or now try and be honest, did you chortle with glee as you got to screw the guy one last time with a ban?