Does this include using out of Eve websites to scam and haras people in game ? Like Goonswarm does ?

you don't know that he wasn't unlike erotic1 he has not made any public statement. And again E1 got what he wanted the guy snapped said some very reprehensible things , but circumstances mean he should not receive the same level of punishment as E1

And literally hundreds of other websites. Good luck getting that one signed off. Your leaders blog will be gone too.

Does this include using out of Eve websites to scam and haras people in game ? Like Goonswarm does ?

I'm already doing 1,2,3 and either 6 or 7. The reason it's either 6 or 7 is that I dont; perform any task I think would be bannable anyway. I don't ransom for songs or anything like that. Believe it or not, I care about the game as a whole, not just specifically the parts that I play.

It even to cover the other side too. One "victim" might get his petition ignore while another sees the banhammer drop. Why should they be treated different if the circumstance are the same just because a GM is adhering to a rule that has no boundaries?

Why do you think it's so hard for CCP just to make a ruling though? Why do you want a massive grey area where people might get banned for stepping on a line that is arbitrarily chosen at the point the GM receive the petition? It's not even about which way they go with the ruling, whatever they choose I'm behind 100%, but from my point of view, they have to choose something. It's unfair not to, to both "victims" and perpetrators.

Quick question before my real post... . why do some character portraits have a RED - or BLUE + in the top right corner?

But what I don't understand is, how in the world do people not understand where the line was crossed?

You are so far away from the point. Slowly I begin to believe that the creepy voice of Ero has manipulated more people than I thought.

I really don't mean to be critical here - just trying to understand. Why are you doing 1? It seems rather pointless and counterproductive.

Do you have an evidence that these rules are going to be applied inconsistently? I've not seen any.

I don't think it's hard for them to produce something that 99% of the playerbase can interpret perfectly well and in fact I believe that they already have. It seems that there's a tiny minority of folks who can't seem to ge their head around it.

Why can't CCP write a definitive set of rules that leave every situation unambiguous? To do so would require something in such extremis that the player base would never except it.

Thus the statement from CCP is deliberately vague: the people who are clearly "over the line" know they're over the line and expect punishment, the people who are clearly "inside the line" know they're inside and are safe from punishment, while the people in the grey area will either retreat to safety or double down. Once that happens, the enforcers can prune off the people who doubled-down because they're clearly evil, rotten apples and the community is obviously better off without them around.

Are songs allowed as ransoms?
How many songs are allowed?
How many are too many?

***** and giggles.

***** and giggles. I generally don't just shut up because a bunch of people disagree with me. I have freedom of trolling, and until CCP strip that from me forcefully I'll continue to exercise my rights.

Fair enough - if you're not actually seeking anything meaningful here I thnk further interaction with you is consequently equally meaningless. Thanks for the clarification.

Seems like a simple question to me. Even CCP have been ransomed for a song, is that practice now outlawed?

And in doing so you avoid answering the question about the rules you state are so easy to understand. I think that pretty much says everything.

Fair enough - if you're not actually seeking anything meaningful here I thnk further interaction with you is consequently equally meaningless. Thanks for the clarification.

Are songs allowed as ransoms?
How many songs are allowed?
How many are too many?

Has Sokhar been banned too? Didn't he issue real life threats and menaces in the bonus room, didn't he call people the N-word.

I can understand why Erotica has been banned but what Sokhar did was just as bad, can anyone clarify if he has been banned as well. If so then justice has been done fairly, if not then justice is clearly one sided in this affair.

Has Sokhar been banned too?

CCP usually doesn't reveal if a player has been banned, why don't you ask Sokhar himself?

The short answer is we don't know and CCP won't tell us. They don't discuss individual cases. Noone here knows, for sure, that E1 has been banned either - it's all inference.

Because he might call me the N-word!

Well, this is bollocks. Erotica1 was banned?

Thank you for turning Eve into SWTOR, Ripard.

RIP the sandbox.

Well, this is bollocks. Erotica1 was banned?

Thank you for turning Eve into SWTOR, Ripard.

RIP the sandbox.

Well, this is bollocks. Erotica1 was banned?

Thank you for turning Eve into SWTOR, Ripard.

RIP the sandbox.

*Mandatory* Can I have your stuff?

My feelings are hurt. Post again and I'll report you to CCP for harassment. And torture!

Well, this is bollocks. Erotica1 was banned?

Thank you for turning Eve into SWTOR, Ripard.

RIP the sandbox.