Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 58 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2480
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 07:35:00 -
[1441] - Quote
The constant tweaking of ships etc to make them all pretty much equal should be carried to its logical conclusion by CCP.
One ship type of each class, no ship allowed to have even a slight advantage over another, just different skins so folk can feel that their ship is 'different' to the others.
Further to this, each ship class should only be allowed to fight ships of the same class in equal number fights.
Finally, Eve Online should be renamed as - Vanilla Online. This is not a signature. |

Montey Haul
Republic University Minmatar Republic
22
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 08:12:00 -
[1442] - Quote
Caoni Mar wrote:As an Ishtar pilot myself, the change doesn't really affect me much. But I always had a problem with them doing BS level damage across the board since the very beginning. I always felt it wast unfair.
To me the solution has always been simple and we now have something of a precedent with the Gurista ships and their role bonus applying only to specific size drones. Simply make the bonus on the Ishtar apply only to light and medium drones and give it a drone bandwidth to match that.
Well, lets just say as a mission runner the changes to the Gurista ships were just a really worthless thing to do! I sold all the Lvl 4 mission rattlers and the Gila is almost completely worthless after having its drone utility removed. I guess whatever they are gonna do is what they are going to do. All this cookie cutter ship mixing is killing the game. If everyone is going to move to the same cookie cutter crap fits... Why have all the daunting SP trains on drones. The stratios has a good sized bay with decent bonuses. Brand new ship... Is that OP too... I don't get why such a bunch of whining one way or the other. Nerf every drone boat. I'll sell the rest of the drones and they can find another sub to replace me. If you have an issue with balance change SP. Make it even more challenging. This game is going downhill in a hurry trying to make it easy for new pilots that don't want a challenge with real time training. Make all the drone ships worthless for anyone that doesn't want to fly a carrier. Good call.... Next nerf the bejesus out of the t3's. Oh yeah, and while we're at it lets give a Laser impervious group like the guristas a super far reaching (over 200km) hit you all day. That will make more folks want to go Paladin for level 4's... Go amarr balance. EM/Therm only works worth a lick on 2 outta 4 existing factions. |

Astral Jesus
Interdimensional Catch 22
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 08:45:00 -
[1443] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:The constant tweaking of ships etc to make them all pretty much equal should be carried to its logical conclusion by CCP.
One ship type of each class, no ship allowed to have even a slight inbuilt advantage over another, just different skins so folk can feel that their ship is 'different' to the others.
Further to this, each ship class should only be allowed to fight ships of the same class in equal number fights.
Finally, Eve Online should be renamed as - Vanilla Online.
Seriously. This seems to be where things are headed. It's sad. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12685
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 08:52:00 -
[1444] - Quote
Astral Jesus wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:The constant tweaking of ships etc to make them all pretty much equal should be carried to its logical conclusion by CCP.
One ship type of each class, no ship allowed to have even a slight inbuilt advantage over another, just different skins so folk can feel that their ship is 'different' to the others.
Further to this, each ship class should only be allowed to fight ships of the same class in equal number fights.
Finally, Eve Online should be renamed as - Vanilla Online. Seriously. This seems to be where things are headed. It's sad.
No it not. They are just getting rid of the FOTM blanace passes. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

James Baboli
Ferrous Infernum
63
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 08:59:00 -
[1445] - Quote
Gotta love the whining about nothing being inherently OP anymore. That crazy bag FC with the silly things on the hull that shouldn't but just did. |

Adrie Atticus
The Shadow Plague The Bastion
217
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 09:16:00 -
[1446] - Quote
VonGurgoth wrote:CCP why don't you spend more time to create balance by releasing new ships more than nerfing existing one?
Because instead of having 1 OP ship and 7 lesser ships, you'd then have 1 OP, 1 okay and 7 "why do you even undock?" ships.
Power creep is not a good idea. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1546
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 09:41:00 -
[1447] - Quote
Adrie Atticus wrote:VonGurgoth wrote:CCP why don't you spend more time to create balance by releasing new ships more than nerfing existing one? Because instead of having 1 OP ship and 7 lesser ships, you'd then have 1 OP, 1 okay and 7 "why do you even undock?" ships. Power creep is not a good idea.
No.. power creep is good because keep peopel interested and make unsubscribed come back. But must be done VERY slowly and very carefully. It is a formula that magic the gathering perfected trough the years, slow power crreep.. than every 4-5 years a drop in power level to start over. But they execute the drop when somethign imensely interestign can distract the players (liek new format or card type) "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1546
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 09:43:00 -
[1448] - Quote
Fitz Muller wrote:I don't like the idea of an 8/4/7 Tempest because the Typhoon has to be armor tanked and the Maelstrom has to be shield tanked. You would force the Tempest into armor which takes away the versatility that the Minmatar are known for. At least for battleship class ships
Versatility in eve means being so bad on both scenarios that no one with marbles undock in a tempest except to duel with a cruiser .... "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12687
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 09:45:00 -
[1449] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Adrie Atticus wrote:VonGurgoth wrote:CCP why don't you spend more time to create balance by releasing new ships more than nerfing existing one? Because instead of having 1 OP ship and 7 lesser ships, you'd then have 1 OP, 1 okay and 7 "why do you even undock?" ships. Power creep is not a good idea. No.. power creep is good because keep peopel interested and make unsubscribed come back.
Get out.
Power creep is a terrible thing. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
260
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 09:59:00 -
[1450] - Quote
Montey Haul wrote:Well, lets just say as a mission runner the changes to the Gurista ships were just a really worthless thing to do! I sold all the Lvl 4 mission rattlers and the Gila is almost completely worthless after having its drone utility removed
I'm sorry but you must be terrible.
1500+ DPS out my rattlesnake I use in missions. I have a PvP fit knocking on for nearly 1200 DPS with nearly a quarter MILLION EHP.
900+ DPS out of a gila.
Yeah, they're simple awful cannot see a use for them at all........
Also, WTF does that have to do with this thread? |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers The Tuskers Co.
59
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 10:41:00 -
[1451] - Quote
Why balance the Ishtar slowly and not just straight away? I read through the first 30 pages of this thread and all the areas that need to be considered have been intelligently highlighted, and actually repeated quite a few times.
Oh and please can you give new subscribers a large learning speed advantage for example 5x learning speed for first 6 weeks? I want less empty systems!
BUFF NOOBS FILL SERVER VERY GOOD
Cheers
|

Montey Haul
Republic University Minmatar Republic
22
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 10:46:00 -
[1452] - Quote
afkalt wrote:Montey Haul wrote:Well, lets just say as a mission runner the changes to the Gurista ships were just a really worthless thing to do! I sold all the Lvl 4 mission rattlers and the Gila is almost completely worthless after having its drone utility removed I'm sorry but you must be terrible. 1500+ DPS out my rattlesnake I use in missions. I have a PvP fit knocking on for nearly 1200 DPS with nearly a quarter MILLION EHP. 900+ DPS out of a gila. Yeah, they're simple awful cannot see a use for them at all........ Also, WTF does that have to do with this thread? lol... Troll much... I quoted the response to anothers post. Read much? Anyhow... I think you are just so awesome :) Is that 1500 with or without Geckos? Oh and by the way... I used the rattler not as an afk boat, but as a utility to rep noobs while they learned the missions. 2nd... The Rattler sucks completely now. A regular Domi is way better than a dual faction ship. Trollollol back at ya! |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2480
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 10:47:00 -
[1453] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Astral Jesus wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:The constant tweaking of ships etc to make them all pretty much equal should be carried to its logical conclusion by CCP.
One ship type of each class, no ship allowed to have even a slight inbuilt advantage over another, just different skins so folk can feel that their ship is 'different' to the others.
Further to this, each ship class should only be allowed to fight ships of the same class in equal number fights.
Finally, Eve Online should be renamed as - Vanilla Online. Seriously. This seems to be where things are headed. It's sad. No it not. They are just getting rid of the FOTM blanace passes.
When you get rid of 'flavour of the month' enough times, you end up with, Vanilla Online  This is not a signature. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
8763
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:15:00 -
[1454] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:When you get rid of 'flavour of the month' enough times, you end up with, Vanilla Online 
Are you even capable of making an argument that isn't built on hyperbole? Seriously.
Oh, and by the way. You want to know what Vanilla Online really is? Where one freaking ship is so much better than every other one in it's class, that there isn't any point in using anything else.
Game balance = variety of choices. It's the exact opposite of what fools like you think. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Clean Up Local 2014.-á |

Ponder Stuff
Deadly Intent. Cynosural Field Theory.
16
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:22:00 -
[1455] - Quote
Great, so they take away 10 of my fighter bombers (dropping 20 looked so much more awesome than 10) because they wanted to reduce load on the server and then they make the most overpowered ship in the game a drone boat... everyone drops drones and you still have the same problem...... ^5 |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12687
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:27:00 -
[1456] - Quote
Montey Haul wrote: The Rattler sucks completely now.
Yea your terrible. Rattle is a beast. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12687
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:29:00 -
[1457] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:When you get rid of 'flavour of the month' enough times, you end up with, Vanilla Online 
So the cynable is the same as an ashimmu?
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1546
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:43:00 -
[1458] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:Adrie Atticus wrote:VonGurgoth wrote:CCP why don't you spend more time to create balance by releasing new ships more than nerfing existing one? Because instead of having 1 OP ship and 7 lesser ships, you'd then have 1 OP, 1 okay and 7 "why do you even undock?" ships. Power creep is not a good idea. No.. power creep is good because keep peopel interested and make unsubscribed come back. Get out. Power creep is a terrible thing.
No its not.. and EVERYONE that studied game design theory knows that. On the long run it is the most easily available tool to keep peopel interested in the game. That has been expressed clearly on all tradign card games, the ones that decided to avoid power creep ALL died, not a single exception. The ones that learned how to manage it survived and gained more players.
psychology is more important in game design than math. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
261
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:44:00 -
[1459] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote: No its not.. and EVERYONE that studied game design theory knows that. On the long run it is the most easily available tool to keep peopel interested in the game. That has been expressed clearly on all tradign card games, the ones that decided to avoid power creep ALL died, not a single exception. The ones that learned how to manage it survived and gained more players.
psychology is more important in game design than math.
Games of strategy tend to be fine without power creep. Eve is basically a game of strategy.
See also: Chess. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
754
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:53:00 -
[1460] - Quote
power creep is done because people cry loads about nerfs, even though buffing 1 thing is basically the same as nerfing everything other than that thing. if you disagree, you're terrible. |

Hakaari Inkuran
State War Academy Caldari State
182
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:53:00 -
[1461] - Quote
Montey Haul wrote:afkalt wrote:Montey Haul wrote:Well, lets just say as a mission runner the changes to the Gurista ships were just a really worthless thing to do! I sold all the Lvl 4 mission rattlers and the Gila is almost completely worthless after having its drone utility removed I'm sorry but you must be terrible. 1500+ DPS out my rattlesnake I use in missions. I have a PvP fit knocking on for nearly 1200 DPS with nearly a quarter MILLION EHP. 900+ DPS out of a gila. Yeah, they're simple awful cannot see a use for them at all........ Also, WTF does that have to do with this thread? lol... Troll much... I quoted the response to anothers post. Read much? Anyhow... I think you are just so awesome :) Is that 1500 with or without Geckos? Oh and by the way... I used the rattler not as an afk boat, but as a utility to rep noobs while they learned the missions. 2nd... The Rattler sucks completely now. A regular Domi is way better than a dual faction ship. Trollollol back at ya!
Geckos brings you to 1700, bright eyes.
1500 is applicable DPS. |

Hakaari Inkuran
State War Academy Caldari State
182
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:54:00 -
[1462] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:baltec1 wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:Adrie Atticus wrote:VonGurgoth wrote:CCP why don't you spend more time to create balance by releasing new ships more than nerfing existing one? Because instead of having 1 OP ship and 7 lesser ships, you'd then have 1 OP, 1 okay and 7 "why do you even undock?" ships. Power creep is not a good idea. No.. power creep is good because keep peopel interested and make unsubscribed come back. Get out. Power creep is a terrible thing. No its not.. and EVERYONE that studied game design theory knows that. On the long run it is the most easily available tool to keep peopel interested in the game. That has been expressed clearly on all tradign card games, the ones that decided to avoid power creep ALL died, not a single exception. The ones that learned how to manage it survived and gained more players. psychology is more important in game design than math.
Game theory as taught by who, acti-blizzard? Get out, you know nothing. |

afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
261
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:56:00 -
[1463] - Quote
Hakaari Inkuran wrote: Geckos brings you to 1700, bright eyes.
1500 is applicable DPS.
Augmented Ogres are higher again. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
8764
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:59:00 -
[1464] - Quote
Hakaari Inkuran wrote: Game theory as taught by who, acti-blizzard? Get out, you know nothing.
Having taken my fair share of game theory, I have to agree with you.
I have never heard of power creep being a good thing for anyone who isn't trying to make their players run the loot treadmill.
Which, as it turns out, people hate. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Clean Up Local 2014.-á |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12688
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 12:01:00 -
[1465] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:
No its not.. and EVERYONE that studied game design theory knows that. On the long run it is the most easily available tool to keep peopel interested in the game. That has been expressed clearly on all tradign card games, the ones that decided to avoid power creep ALL died, not a single exception. The ones that learned how to manage it survived and gained more players.
psychology is more important in game design than math.
EVE isn't a trading card game. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Hakaari Inkuran
State War Academy Caldari State
182
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 12:03:00 -
[1466] - Quote
afkalt wrote:Hakaari Inkuran wrote: Geckos brings you to 1700, bright eyes.
1500 is applicable DPS.
Augmented Ogres are higher again. Yeah, they're pretty damn cool and its nice that the rattler makes such efficient use of them, since it turns 2 drones into 5 |

James Baboli
Ferrous Infernum
65
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 12:10:00 -
[1467] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:
No its not.. and EVERYONE that studied game design theory knows that. On the long run it is the most easily available tool to keep peopel interested in the game. That has been expressed clearly on all tradign card games, the ones that decided to avoid power creep ALL died, not a single exception. The ones that learned how to manage it survived and gained more players.
psychology is more important in game design than math.
EVE isn't a trading card game. And as such does not base it's income on how many people are willing to put money into a blind draw from a limited selection of things in hopes of getting the shiny thing. That would be blink or vegas depending on taste. That crazy bag FC with the silly things on the hull that shouldn't but just did. |

Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1186
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 12:56:00 -
[1468] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Hakaari Inkuran wrote: Game theory as taught by who, acti-blizzard? Get out, you know nothing.
Having taken my fair share of game theory, I have to agree with you. I have never heard of power creep being a good thing for anyone who isn't trying to make their players run the loot treadmill. Which, as it turns out, people hate.
The real issue with powercreep in EVE is the lack of exit solution. If your powercreep treadmill is followed correctly with a scaling content treadmill, you are really only giving new models of loot to your player. This just can't be done in EVE. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2480
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 13:21:00 -
[1469] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:When you get rid of 'flavour of the month' enough times, you end up with, Vanilla Online  Are you even capable of making an argument that isn't built on hyperbole? Seriously. Oh, and by the way. You want to know what Vanilla Online really is? Where one freaking ship is so much better than every other one in it's class, that there isn't any point in using anything else. Game balance = variety of choices. It's the exact opposite of what fools like you think.
Thank you for your kind words good sir.
You are still my favourite crazy poster  This is not a signature. |

FLICK ME
The Dutch Rudder
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 13:49:00 -
[1470] - Quote
Reduce heavy drone bandwidth to 20, reduce ishtar bandwidth to remove BATTLESHIP class weapon from CRUISER Hull.
Either that or give me an Eagle that can fit large hybrids and watch hilarity ensue.
KTHNXBYE |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 58 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |