Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
The PitBoss
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.05.30 00:36:00 -
[181]
Originally by: Waxau Hi Pitboss!
Yo Wax ... Glad you can use a keyboard now ... that PENI$ reduction must have been a success
Thanks,
PB
Siggys and Banners by: Kalen Vox |
JVol
The IMorral MAjority Imorral Dragons
|
Posted - 2008.05.30 01:17:00 -
[182]
Originally by: Hoggustus Edited by: Hoggustus on 28/05/2008 13:07:06 Edited by: Hoggustus on 28/05/2008 12:58:36
Originally by: Ehranavaar theft should have consequences.
How can salvaging can be called theft? here's how I view it! In the first place the ship is mine since I paid for it, equip it, rig it, whatever... You blow my ship for whatever reason... the wreck is mine since it's the wreck of MY ship! yeah YOU blow it to have acces at my cargo (or simply for fun) you can even salvage MY wreck if you want. So if a third party come and salvage before you do it... he's not agressing you in any matter! so you should'nt have any reason to gain aggression right over him! The rightfull owner of the wreck is still me! even if you blow it up... it's not yours rightfully it's MINE! The agression right should be mine, even if i've been blown up! Unfortunatly, 90% of the time i'm a NPC! and i don't return to my wreck very often.
The fact that you get "yoinked" by a third party salvager get you ****ed real good. You then cry out loud so CCP bend rule to your advantage even if it does'nt make any sense logically!
This is the reason i don't give any support for this demand... and unfortunately... i think CCP have the same view!
(sorry for the many grammatical error... not my first language )
Simple answer.. the 'ship' is yours, when I blow it up, "I" just made the wreck, its mine..or should be. Same with mission wrecks as far as im concerned
|
Captain Batou
Heretic Mercenary Heretic Nation
|
Posted - 2008.05.30 08:21:00 -
[183]
Yup, I think this would be a valid policy shift. All you little vermin that like swooping in like vultures on my, or anyone elses, kills and slavaging plexes while they're still being run should have to accept the risk for your thefts. If you wanna steal, you should be given the opportunity to show just how crafty you are. After all, a dumb thief is a dead one. Show me how smart you can be. Hey CCP, try nerfing an industrial ship next time. |
Demetri Slavic
Ghost Festival
|
Posted - 2008.05.30 17:21:00 -
[184]
|
Helliott
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.05.30 17:42:00 -
[185]
/signed I hope ccp will change that!!!
Ingame: Helliott Corp: Nomadic Tribe Alliance: Privateer Alliance |
Frug
Repo Industries R.E.P.O.
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 06:55:00 -
[186]
Edited by: Frug on 01/06/2008 06:55:12 I would say yes IF you are at war with the target, and no if you're just suicide ganking or doing a criminal act.
A war target's loot should be yours.
- - - - - - - - - Do not use dotted lines - - - - - - - If you think I'm awesome, say BOOO BOOO!! - Ductoris Neat look what I found - Kreul Hey, my marbles |
Drago Vanguard
Vanguard Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 08:50:00 -
[187]
Loot snatching with impunity got old after my first kill.
|
Calcyon Venthor
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 15:59:00 -
[188]
Edited by: Calcyon Venthor on 02/06/2008 16:02:57 *Please delete*
|
Venthor Lorn
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 16:02:00 -
[189]
I don't pvp too much...usually it's unwilling too, lol. I understand the issue though. I'd be ****ed if someone was able to loot a level 4 I'd finished with no threat of repercussions.
Pvp just adds to the game, like it or not. How easy (i.e. boring) would the game be if we didn't have Pvpirates to add suspense and danger?
|
nitra1000
Aliastra
|
Posted - 2008.06.03 13:41:00 -
[190]
/support
I killed 1.5billion isk yesterday when a corp came to try and kill me (lol).
How was i supposed to l00t the wrecks whislt i was still fighting
Do you know how much i spent on cap boosters and armor repair in that fight 20MILLION isk for 5 mins of pvp and i earn't nothing KILLING MACROS UNTIL MY WALLET RUNS OUT |
|
Sevacant
|
Posted - 2008.06.05 04:09:00 -
[191]
|
Brmble
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.05 09:25:00 -
[192]
Make it so both (killer and swooper) are flagged. ~ no not believin in urself ~ |
Dinique
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.05 10:09:00 -
[193]
Definately agree with this.
This is a huge pain in the ass in high sec. _____ The species has amused itself to death
|
Daenarys Vae
|
Posted - 2008.06.05 10:11:00 -
[194]
Originally by: Spork Thalamus I definitely agree that this should be reviewed. It seems obvious that the victor in a legal war dec kill should have a claim on the spoils.
But having a claim on loot from piracy (especially hi-sec suicide ganks) would be a bit of a stretch to justify.
It doesn't apply. Take a moment to think before you post.
In a suicide gank everyone on the killmail is dead, and won't be able to deal with thieves in any case
|
Somatic Neuron
|
Posted - 2008.06.05 13:14:00 -
[195]
Should have been this way from the start. However, there should be a timer on it, say, the length of the agression timer, before it is free-for-all. ---------- |
Mara Rinn
|
Posted - 2008.06.05 23:28:00 -
[196]
Hey Mr. PvP man, play a song for me! I'm not blinky and there's nowhere I'm going to
Hey Mr. PvP man play a song for me! Just to watch those tears a'flowin', I'll come followin' you
Though you know that empire's ganking has you pickin' up no loot, Vanished from your wreck, Let me boldly lift it now but still you're warping My gumption amazes me, I'm branded on my feet, You had no one to meet At the unwatched wreck, perhaps you need a wingman?
Hey, Mr PvP man, play a song for me! Welcome to the world of weapon free PvP!
|
Simo98
|
Posted - 2008.06.06 07:30:00 -
[197]
simo98 votes yes on proposition (insert random number here)
|
Jaketh Ivanes
Do Or Die And Live Or Try The Kano Organisation
|
Posted - 2008.06.06 09:58:00 -
[198]
Edited by: Jaketh Ivanes on 06/06/2008 10:00:07 EDIT: Crap, i need glasses
|
Akiba Penrose
PAK
|
Posted - 2008.06.06 10:25:00 -
[199]
- - Falcons |
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient Electus Matari
|
Posted - 2008.06.06 11:30:00 -
[200]
Yea, go for it. Consistency between pve and pvp is a good thing as far as it is possible.
-- Help us defend the Republic; join Gradient today.
|
|
Tozmeister
Digital Fury Corporation Digital Renegades
|
Posted - 2008.06.06 11:31:00 -
[201]
agreed. +++????+++Out of Cheese Error. Redo From Start+++
|
Purvy
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.08 23:45:00 -
[202]
Edited by: Purvy on 08/06/2008 23:45:53 agreed
|
Madboy
Mentally Unstable Enterprises Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 03:21:00 -
[203]
Bloody oath I support the flagging idea.
To many times has this happened.
You and your mates risk your ships in battle. Only to watch the spoils be snapped up by someone else without any sort of repercussions.
Anyways, - Madboy
|
Frayen
Band of the Damned Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 08:11:00 -
[204]
A lot of good discussion here.
Originally by: Zealota FrayenÆs insults infuriate me, players should not be allowed to get away with this grotesque language. I am calmed by the fact you have an impending ban.
|
TimMc
Genos Occidere
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 09:01:00 -
[205]
I hate the vultures.
|
konjev
Enrave Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 10:15:00 -
[206]
great idea, no more loot gone to carebear bystanders w/o being able to do anything
|
Fifth Horseman
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 13:17:00 -
[207]
I broadly support this idea and wish I didn't have to type a message saying so just to give a thumbs up and if the CSM only ever achieves one thing in it's no doubt short lived existance let's hope this is it and yes I know how to use grammar and punctuation and no I didn't want to use any |
cptblood
Mentally Unstable Enterprises Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 17:47:00 -
[208]
|
supr3m3justic3
ACE'S OVER 8'S The Kano Organisation
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 18:53:00 -
[209]
Agreed....
|
Reggie Kray
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 19:16:00 -
[210]
agreed
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |