Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
132
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 16:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hello Everyone,
Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online) and, despite Gridlock and Team BFF's efforts, general stagnation when it comes to fixes and improvements, the CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Abrazzar
88
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
More vague promises.
Praise the NDA! Please visit your user settings to re-enable images. |

Denidil
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
79
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
i hope the CSM is successful in their endeavors to get lots of love for FiS in the winter expansion WiS is kinda cool and all, but FiS is more important.-á More FIS WORK! Nerf Supers, get the new backgrounds, buff assault ships, do the 0.0 balance, buff lowsec. and make a space pony! DUST SHOULD BE ON THE PC (a real platform!) GDI! I WILL NOT BUY A FQNG PS3 |

Vicar2008
Royal Black Watch Highlanders Warped Aggression
16
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said. Check out the last Dev blogs, plenty of words, no real Comming up content with changes/number crunching etc. |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
110
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
We all wish we could say more, but the rules are the rules. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
132
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
Vicar2008 wrote:No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said. Check out the last Dev blogs, plenty of words, no real Comming up content with changes/number crunching etc.
It's not a bone being thrown. Meetings like this one, when they reach their conclusion, take the form of a devblog and CSM posts. I believed it important for you to know that discussion is underway to address the problems, even if I can't disclose in what way yet. Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Abrazzar
88
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
Two step wrote:We all wish we could say more, but the rules are the rules. Those rules clearly undermine your usefulness. Please visit your user settings to re-enable images. |

Cedric deBouilard
PonyWaffe Test Alliance Please Ignore
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:09:00 -
[8] - Quote
to CSM; I realize CCP (and NDA) limits your ability to make clear statements here in forums, but know some people (me included) think you're doing a damn fine job of pestering, annoying, poking the CCP and trying to give them a wake-up call.
your efforts are much appreciated. |

Denidil
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
79
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:09:00 -
[9] - Quote
can you encourage CCP Zulu to come into the thread and make some substantive comments, i know you guys aren't allowed to reveal anything. WiS is kinda cool and all, but FiS is more important.-á More FIS WORK! Nerf Supers, get the new backgrounds, buff assault ships, do the 0.0 balance, buff lowsec. and make a space pony! DUST SHOULD BE ON THE PC (a real platform!) GDI! I WILL NOT BUY A FQNG PS3 |

E man Industries
SeaChell Productions
78
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
WoW.
I really do hope we get more FiS development...
I really want EvE to do well but on a more selfish note
I just lack things to do and am bored and frustrated with eve....
hope some changes to FiS re-invigorate my desire to actually log in. |
|

Vicar2008
Royal Black Watch Highlanders Warped Aggression
16
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Vicar2008 wrote:No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said. Check out the last Dev blogs, plenty of words, no real Comming up content with changes/number crunching etc. It's not a bone being thrown. Meetings like this one, when they reach their conclusion, take the form of a devblog and CSM posts. I believed it important for you to know that discussion is underway to address the problems, even if I can't disclose in what way yet.
Forgive my frustrations, its Friday afternoon I dont envisage any new information comming to light till Best speed Monday at best. Heres hoping i am completly wrong  |

Florestan Bronstein
United Engineering Services
33
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:11:00 -
[12] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Durign that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. so this is all about FiS budget vs Incarna budget now?
... and I thought there was a strong EVE vs DUST vs WoD component in the CSM's displeasure about resource prioritization.
I guess Zulu can use you as a bargaining chip if we get lucky ("the CSM made me do over 9000 additional projects that I don't have the manpower to do unless you increase my budget") 
But this wasn't really what I had hoped for after all the talk about addressing upper management ...
(pretty sure that for Apocrypha - the great "all hands on deck" example everybody has been ranting about lately - manpower from other (non-EVE) teams was borrowed) |

riverini
Reliables Inc BricK sQuAD.
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:15:00 -
[13] - Quote
You have my bow! |

Yvan Ratamnim
Phoenix Evolved Part Duo
12
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:17:00 -
[14] - Quote
Yay more Vague discussions, what was it that CCP once said "we look at what player do not what they say" ... well same goes back at ya CCP/CSM |

Cearain
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
31
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:18:00 -
[15] - Quote
Great work CSM 6! Continue to do your best to get more devs actually assigned to eve core game play. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1329906
|

Crunchmeister
THORN Syndicate BricK sQuAD.
34
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:21:00 -
[16] - Quote
I think this CSM is really holding CCP's feet to the fire on any issue that the community perceives to be a problem. However, I also feel CCP have just gotten better flame-proof boots and will still find a way to ignore it.
From what I can tell about the minutes of the last 2 summits (including the emergency ones), it seems that CCP will bend over backwards to try to tell the CSM whatever they want to hear in order to get them off their backs, yet have no intention of actually following through with anything, because they have the attitude that they know best. They just want to shut the CSM up and make them happy. To me it feels like express diplomacy to get the CSM out of their hair, and nothing more.
About 15 years ago, I worked for a retired air force colonel who had been an attach+¬ to the Canadian embassy in Moscow in the late 80s. From his experience, he described successful diplomacy as: "the fine art of telling someone to go to Hell in such a way that they leave looking forward to the trip". From what I can tell, CCP management have become quite proficient in this artform. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Atlas.
61
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:23:00 -
[17] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online) and, despite Gridlock and Team BFF's efforts, general stagnation when it comes to fixes and improvements, the CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 cool story bro |

E man Industries
SeaChell Productions
78
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:26:00 -
[18] - Quote
Can the CSm meet with higher than Zulu...
I'm sure zulu would agree with much of what the CSM wants...but he can't allocate more budget from WoD to FIS. |

Zakua Corbin
3rd MERC Squadron
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:34:00 -
[19] - Quote
Does this mean we get sparkled Pony ships with lipstick and giant flying kittens? I can't hold out any longer! |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
110
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:38:00 -
[20] - Quote
E man Industries wrote:Can the CSm meet with higher than Zulu...
I'm sure zulu would agree with much of what the CSM wants...but he can't allocate more budget from WoD to FIS.
I'm 99% sure that the only person above Zulu is Hilmar. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |
|

Azahni Vah'nos
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:39:00 -
[21] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Vicar2008 wrote:No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said. Check out the last Dev blogs, plenty of words, no real Comming up content with changes/number crunching etc. It's not a bone being thrown. Meetings like this one, when they reach their conclusion, take the form of a devblog and CSM posts. I believed it important for you to know that discussion is underway to address the problems, even if I can't disclose in what way yet.
If the monoclegate meeting minutes is the current standard for the release of information from meetings between CCP and the CSM you'll understand if I'm a little dubious about when we might see a Devblog, etc regarding this one. |

Large Collidable Object
morons. Interstellar Hobos
161
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:58:00 -
[22] - Quote
Zakua Corbin wrote:Does this mean we get sparkled Pony ships with lipstick and giant flying kittens?  I can't hold out any longer!
Really? REALLY? WHEN CCP, WHEN?
For motivation (You're going to like this, Zymurgist): If I wasn't deeply bored with stagnant EVE content (I refuse to call Eve 'fis' all of a sudden), I'd probably fly spaceships again instead of trying to get anything out of my subscription by trying to find new professions like supermodel or roleplayer and posting about them on the forums.
Is that good?
I don't need much - just take the 5 least flown ships and boost them - take the 5 most flown ships and nerf them - do that once/twice a year and I'll be fine... morons are recruiting. You know who you are! |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
130
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 17:59:00 -
[23] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online) and, despite Gridlock and Team BFF's efforts, general stagnation when it comes to fixes and improvements, the CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6
Sounds good, but the currency of sounding good has become rather devalued as of late.
Ah man I'm sorry, I know you're doing everything that can be done in your situation and I am genuinely grateful. I hope your efforts end up being rewarded with tangible results. Please keep on trying for us.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal made on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. |

Captain Hindsite
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:01:00 -
[24] - Quote
Cedric deBouilard wrote:to CSM; I realize CCP (and NDA) limits your ability to make clear statements here in forums, but know some people (me included) think you're doing a damn fine job of pestering, annoying, poking the CCP and trying to give them a wake-up call.
your efforts are much appreciated.
Agreed. |

Smoking Blunts
18
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:01:00 -
[25] - Quote
ccp are full of words and no action.
we watch what they do and its nothing but false statements and lies.
personnaly i expect more pr spin and little to no action, same as teh last 18 months CCP-áare full of words and no action. We watch what they do and its nothing but false statements and lies.
|

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
46
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:01:00 -
[26] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online)
Holy crap I like this one
They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |

Cailais
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
23
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:02:00 -
[27] - Quote
So you've had a meeting to arrange a meeting?
Cool.
C.
|

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
46
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:04:00 -
[28] - Quote
Two step wrote:We all wish we could say more, but the rules are the rules.
the same argument used in the other thread. Out of curiosity, your NDA doesnt have a clause noting you arent allowed to refer to the NDA in the manner you all have been? I know the one for SWTOR does
an just so you know, what this truly says is "Im glad we have a NDA so we can point to it and shrug mysteriously" They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |

Lens Thirring
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:07:00 -
[29] - Quote
Two step wrote:We all wish we could say more, but the rules are the rules. You could tell us what you proposed.
How many more resources are you demanding for FiS? In what form: A new dev team, or add some devs to existing teams? Hire new people, or take them from existing projects? Or should Soundwave just be working longer hours? What should be their priorities (FiS covers a lot of ground)? What timescales are acceptable for them to carry this out?
We don't know how much of this has been thought through, but if you're making demands presumably you have demands to make.
Surely there is not an NDA on your own ideas for adding resources to FiS. |

Gwenywell Shumuku
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:07:00 -
[30] - Quote
CCP's credibility is at 0. CSM credibility is at ....near 0. Why? Who was it that called the players "whiners" and told the media everything was ok after the meeting? Who utterly lost all momentum of the rage because they drowned in self-importance?
CCP did with the CSM what they do with the forum-playerbase, they ignore, manipulate and turn whats happening into PR-stuff (like the CSM minutes...we don't even have yet...because of this).
So, now you talk with Zulu AGAIN, maybe you can make a new youtube-video telling everyone that THIS TIME everything is different, we learned how to communicate, and everything will be better.
No, really, nearly everyone i talk to ingame or out of game are disillusioned about CCP by now, they have to deliver, end of story. If they don't, then the decline will spiral out of control. EVE is dying? Well, this time its pretty close to actually deserve it.
|
|

Soi Mala
Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:10:00 -
[31] - Quote
Why oh why is this company so scared of committing to anything?
"Hey uhhhh we got some patch coming up but uhhh... we won't tell you what it'l include until the day before, just incase we mess anything up and can't include it... cos you know, we would want to look like morons... :straightface:"
|

Rykuss
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:14:00 -
[32] - Quote
Two step wrote:We all wish we could say more, but the rules are the rules.
Ok, let's play hot/cold then.
Ponies?! Can I have your vindicator? |

Psychophantic
24
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:14:00 -
[33] - Quote
Deja vu anyone? |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
27
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:16:00 -
[34] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online) and, despite Gridlock and Team BFF's efforts, general stagnation when it comes to fixes and improvements, the CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 8/10
-2 for being too obvious.
|

Rhaegor Stormborn
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
59
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:16:00 -
[35] - Quote
Soi Mala wrote:Why oh why is this company so scared of committing to anything?
"Hey uhhhh we got some patch coming up but uhhh... we won't tell you what it'l include until the day before, just incase we mess anything up and can't include it... cos you know, we would want to look like morons... :straightface:"
Because the are not doing anything. They lie and lie so you keep playing skill training online in the hopes that they will do something. They are stringing us along and playing us for fools and suckers. Though, slowly but surely, this is no longer working as evidenced by the declining PCU and subscriptions.
|

Aldan Romar
Imperial Academy
12
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:17:00 -
[36] - Quote
Gwenywell Shumuku wrote:... they have to deliver ... Deliver what, exactly?
The state of some people's mind at the moment would have them scream whatever CCP says, as well as scream when CCP doesn't say anything - I know what I would do as a company in that situation...
CCP is not going to turn back time and not going to abandon their business plans. They may change some details, but that's about it.
I think we should be happy that they try to listen at all. Style over substance |

Prince Kobol
25
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:18:00 -
[37] - Quote
Anybody else having deja vu
hmm.. i will make a predication.
CSM will come back saying everything is fine.
The Mittani will be smugger then usual and will claim to have saved Eve, again.
CCP will post a dev blog with ponies and and how they have learned their lesson blah blah blah
Details of the winter expansion are annouced lots of people will get angry and the CSM will go rar and CCP will be silent and the forum will be full of rage and we will go.. hang on, this feels similar, deja vu anybody |

baltec1
25
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:20:00 -
[38] - Quote
Rykuss wrote:Two step wrote:We all wish we could say more, but the rules are the rules. Ok, let's play hot/cold then. Ponies?! hmm? wha?
Someone said ponies? |

Sovennek
Jolly Codgers Get Off My Lawn
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:22:00 -
[39] - Quote
Cedric deBouilard wrote:to CSM; I realize CCP (and NDA) limits your ability to make clear statements here in forums, but know some people (me included) think you're doing a damn fine job of pestering, annoying, poking the CCP and trying to give them a wake-up call.
your efforts are much appreciated. Hear! Hear! Remember: They're only pixels; it's not real money; it's supposed to be fun! |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
110
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:25:00 -
[40] - Quote
Lens Thirring wrote:Two step wrote:We all wish we could say more, but the rules are the rules. You could tell us what you proposed. How many more resources are you demanding for FiS? In what form: A new dev team, or add some devs to existing teams? Hire new people, or take them from existing projects? Or should Soundwave just be working longer hours? What should be their priorities (FiS covers a lot of ground)? What timescales are acceptable for them to carry this out? We don't know how much of this has been thought through, but if you're making demands presumably you have demands to make. Surely there is not an NDA on your own ideas for adding resources to FiS.
No, I can't tell you what we proposed. Even things that I say to CCP can be covered by the NDA.
Again, our role is not to tell CCP who to hire or who to make work weekends. We are dissatisfied with the current level of staffing on FiS, and we want CCP to change that. Adding a single person would be good, switching the entire company over to working on EVE would be better. Hopefully we will end up somewhere in between.
My own ideas on what should be added are irrelevant. I still favor the same stuff I favored when I ran for CSM, you can see details on that in my blog (linked in my signature). In general, the CSM is all in agreement that the *critical* issue right now is balance (especially supercaps, but including all ships), and we would like to see that fixed ASAP. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |
|

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
413
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:26:00 -
[41] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online) and, despite Gridlock and Team BFF's efforts, general stagnation when it comes to fixes and improvements, the CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 Sounds good, but the currency of sounding good has become rather devalued as of late. Ah man I'm sorry, I know you're doing everything that can be done in your situation and I am genuinely grateful. I hope your efforts end up being rewarded with tangible results. Please keep on trying for us.
I agree, 'sounds good' is unsatisfying in this situation. Red meat is the only thing that concerns CSM6, not sound bites - deliverable improvements to EVE and a ruthless focus on FiS.
Yet updates to the players have to come across as best they can across the wall of the NDA, and right now we can only divulge that a meeting occurred and that methods of resolution were discussed.
I thought it was a useful conversation and I look forward to the next meeting - useful enough that we'll be relaxing the media pressure for now. Take that for what you will.
|

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
17
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:26:00 -
[42] - Quote
Two step wrote:E man Industries wrote:Can the CSm meet with higher than Zulu...
I'm sure zulu would agree with much of what the CSM wants...but he can't allocate more budget from WoD to FIS. I'm 99% sure that the only person above Zulu is Hilmar.
you are wrong, there is a shadow figure behind the scenes, that is above Hilmar and gives him orders everyday!
this person is the one that is really in charge and the one CSM should be talking with
This person is:
--> Hilmar's wife! 
Last order issued:
"Hilmar, get out of the PC, stop playing that terrible game of yours and get the trash out! now!" |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
48
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:35:00 -
[43] - Quote
At the very least, we now that the CSM's declaration of War, and the Viral Marketing that picked up on it, had results. |

Denidil
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
79
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:37:00 -
[44] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Malcanis wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online) and, despite Gridlock and Team BFF's efforts, general stagnation when it comes to fixes and improvements, the CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 Sounds good, but the currency of sounding good has become rather devalued as of late. Ah man I'm sorry, I know you're doing everything that can be done in your situation and I am genuinely grateful. I hope your efforts end up being rewarded with tangible results. Please keep on trying for us. I agree, 'sounds good' is unsatisfying in this situation. Red meat is the only thing that concerns CSM6, not sound bites - deliverable improvements to EVE and a ruthless focus on FiS. Yet updates to the players have to come across as best they can across the wall of the NDA, and right now we can only divulge that a meeting occurred and that methods of resolution were discussed. I thought it was a useful conversation and I look forward to the next meeting - useful enough that we'll be relaxing the media pressure for now. Take that for what you will.
aka CCP Hilmar perceived the clear shot across the bow, and realized "i'm pissing off my companies core customers".
WiS is kinda cool and all, but FiS is more important.-á More FIS WORK! Nerf Supers, get the new backgrounds, buff assault ships, do the 0.0 balance, buff lowsec. and make a space pony! DUST SHOULD BE ON THE PC (a real platform!) GDI! I WILL NOT BUY A FQNG PS3 |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
32
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:38:00 -
[45] - Quote
You know, your proposals to CCP would not be covered by the NDA if you told us what they were BEFORE you talked to CCP. CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. |

Cailais
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
23
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:40:00 -
[46] - Quote
The Mittani wrote: we'll be relaxing the media pressure for now. Take that for what you will.
Got the slap down huh?
C.
|

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
46
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:43:00 -
[47] - Quote
You know, this whole WiS / NeX store arrangement is making me think When Star Trek Online launched, they had a cash store (C-Store) into which they put all kinds of uniforms, races (not available in game), Traditional ship designs (Excelsior), and told the playerbase quite literally, on the forums a few months after the ships started being put in and ppl started getting pissy, "You all have been asking for all this stuff for months now. If it wasnt for the C-Store, this wouldnt exist"
Im thinking that was the point of WiS. If it wasnt for NeX CCP would have had no incentive to finish the project. "For us, the players" is a pretty big laugh now that we've seen how CCP actually feels about us lol They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
413
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:43:00 -
[48] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:You know, your proposals to CCP would not be covered by the NDA if you told us what they were BEFORE you talked to CCP.
We've made no secret about CSM6's desire to see more resources allocated to FiS. I'm not sure what part of our message you didn't understand from the blizzard of media coverage, podcasts, blogs, and CSM member posts during this controversy.
You can lead a poster to the internet, but you can't make him r>c>p. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
46
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:46:00 -
[49] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:we'll be relaxing the media pressure for now. Take that for what you will.
Why do I have the possible feeling legal measures and/or bannings were threatened lol
its ok, its fairly obvious YOU dont stand for anything here. Color me not surprised you flip-flopped yet again They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |

Smoking Blunts
18
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:48:00 -
[50] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:You know, your proposals to CCP would not be covered by the NDA if you told us what they were BEFORE you talked to CCP. We've made no secret about CSM6's desire to see more resources allocated to FiS. I'm not sure what part of our message you didn't understand from the blizzard of media coverage, podcasts, blogs, and CSM member posts during this controversy. You can lead a poster to the internet, but you can't make him r>c>p.
is it gonna be 3 months til we see the minuets of this meeting too? CCP-áare full of words and no action. We watch what they do and its nothing but false statements and lies.
|
|

Kengutsi Akira
GloboTech Industries
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:51:00 -
[51] - Quote
Its really funny how the CSM brags how influential you all are in your blogs but when you get called on it on the forums, suddenly you dont have any power |

bitters much
Nekkid Inc.
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:53:00 -
[52] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:
I agree, 'sounds good' is unsatisfying in this situation. Red meat is the only thing that concerns CSM6, not sound bites - deliverable improvements to EVE and a ruthless focus on FiS.
Yet updates to the players have to come across as best they can across the wall of the NDA, and right now we can only divulge that a meeting occurred and that methods of resolution were discussed.
I thought it was a useful conversation and I look forward to the next meeting - useful enough that we'll be relaxing the media pressure for now. Take that for what you will.
tldr version:
I need more time to fish for new ideas on Failheap and then claim them as brand new born out of my mastermind  |

Kengutsi Akira
GloboTech Industries
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:54:00 -
[53] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:feelin smug now, not gonna lie~
still feelin smug? Sounds more like you all got slapped back into reality |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
32
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 18:56:00 -
[54] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:You know, your proposals to CCP would not be covered by the NDA if you told us what they were BEFORE you talked to CCP. We've made no secret about CSM6's desire to see more resources allocated to FiS. I'm not sure what part of our message you didn't understand from the blizzard of media coverage, podcasts, blogs, and CSM member posts during this controversy. You can lead a poster to the internet, but you can't make him r>c>p.
The details is what I don't understand. Like how much effort you propose to be shifted, what you propose to do with incarna (have it become yet another abandoned feature?) and so on. Do you think that eve should get more funding that the income from subscriptions and PLEX sales? If the money being spent of FiS is equal to the subscriptions, is it OK for CCP to spend money on WiS, Dust, Wod?
One of the above CSM members said that there was stuff CSM proposed that cannot be talked about because it was covered by the NDA. So there must have been CSM proposals that have not been in the media coverage, since if it was in the media coverage, it would be public and not under an NDA.
All Im saying is you could have given us that information first, before it got locked up under a NDA.
CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. |

Grot Bags
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:03:00 -
[55] - Quote
All things considered, I am boldly going to predict that at Fanfest 2012 (assuming Eve has any fans left willing to attend), Hilmar in true homage to Icelandic humour, while nurturing his deep understanding of what the core customer base wants, will take to the stage to defend Incarna, WiS and Dust 514, amidst smoke, spooky sound effects and a fanfare of buzz words; emerging from a coffin with a PS3 Logo on the front of it while dressed up a a vampire; in an attempt to break the ice and reassure everybody that the future of Eve Online is in safe hands.
|

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
15
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:05:00 -
[56] - Quote
We'll see what we see.
My gut reaction is that CCP is incapable of reacting this fast but we'll see. |

Dalketh
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:06:00 -
[57] - Quote
Yes serious deja vu. The only thing missing could be a video of mittens joshing around with a CCP rep and talking about how great communication is going to be in the future and then tweeting about how drunk he was getting.... and in general reassuring the players they were over-reacting. Oh.... wait that's more deja vu... as that was what happened last July.
Prince Kobol wrote:Anybody else having deja vu
hmm.. i will make a predication.
CSM will come back saying everything is fine.
The Mittani will be smugger then usual and will claim to have saved Eve, again.
CCP will post a dev blog with ponies and and how they have learned their lesson blah blah blah
Details of the winter expansion are annouced lots of people will get angry and the CSM will go rar and CCP will be silent and the forum will be full of rage and we will go.. hang on, this feels similar, deja vu anybody
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
130
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:08:00 -
[58] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:The Mittani wrote:we'll be relaxing the media pressure for now. Take that for what you will.
Why do I have the possible feeling legal measures and/or bannings were threatened lol
From the available evidence, because you're not too bright and twist everything to fit your pre-conceived worldview?
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal made on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. |

Vicar2008
Royal Black Watch Highlanders Warped Aggression
16
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:08:00 -
[59] - Quote
Vicar2008 wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Vicar2008 wrote:No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said. Check out the last Dev blogs, plenty of words, no real Comming up content with changes/number crunching etc. It's not a bone being thrown. Meetings like this one, when they reach their conclusion, take the form of a devblog and CSM posts. I believed it important for you to know that discussion is underway to address the problems, even if I can't disclose in what way yet. Forgive my frustrations, its Friday afternoon I dont envisage any new information comming to light till Best speed Monday at best. Heres hoping i am completly wrong 
Going to requote myself here, its always on a fecking Friday, more threads of us complaining you guys are telling us Jack :( note to CSM have it on Mondays we may know by Tuesday or Wednesday WTF is going on.......
God I am so bitter, anyone got a lemon? |

Dalketh
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:16:00 -
[60] - Quote
Yup yet another meeting with the CSM then no information due to NDA and everyone told to wait - AGAIN. CCP is getting smarter tho... this time they arranged the meeting more quickly to nip it in the bud and get the CSM to shut up.
Xython wrote:At the very least, we now that the CSM's declaration of War, and the Viral Marketing that picked up on it, had results.
|
|

Iceni
Angel Constellation
12
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:17:00 -
[61] - Quote
So lets see... the CSM said stuff (but can't tell us what it was). CCP Zulu also said stuff (but won't tell us what it was).
You guys are better at Mushroom Management than my employer, and that's saying something!
Also reassurances that the converstaion focused on FiS don't reassure me one bit. Goon's game is totally different from mine, and the majority of the player base.
So I'm sorry but I can't get even a glimmer of excitement about this thread.
|

Ryunosuke Kusanagi
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:20:00 -
[62] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:The Mittani wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:You know, your proposals to CCP would not be covered by the NDA if you told us what they were BEFORE you talked to CCP. We've made no secret about CSM6's desire to see more resources allocated to FiS. I'm not sure what part of our message you didn't understand from the blizzard of media coverage, podcasts, blogs, and CSM member posts during this controversy. You can lead a poster to the internet, but you can't make him r>c>p. The details is what I don't understand. Like how much effort you propose to be shifted, what you propose to do with incarna (have it become yet another abandoned feature?) and so on. Do you think that eve should get more funding that the income from subscriptions and PLEX sales? If the money being spent of FiS is equal to the subscriptions, is it OK for CCP to spend money on WiS, Dust, Wod? One of the above CSM members said that there was stuff CSM proposed that cannot be talked about because it was covered by the NDA. So there must have been CSM proposals that have not been in the media coverage, since if it was in the media coverage, it would be public and not under an NDA. All Im saying is you could have given us that information first, before it got locked up under a NDA.
This is a valid concern, and to me, it is starting to sound like "Damn CCP if they do, Damn them if they don't!" situation. While the CSM is supposed, and try, to bring valid concerns to CCP, I think, that by the nature of the game (ie. populist theory) they are kinda failing at it. I definately want FiS worked on more as of late, but, I don't want Incarna to be finished as it is now, I would like to see different CQ, I would like to see in Station Shops, etc. I don't care about the NDA, that is a non-issue, that happens all the time in games. The core problem, is what is going on within CCP (again) and what is being done about it? I would like ideally, would be more... direction from CCP. What I mean is a regular blog post stating "This is what we are working on and is slated for x amount of months, this is the progress we are making on it, etc." The last I heard about Incarna was that the other "CQ was coming out in a few months." This was back in July-ish. And couple of days ago, through a twitter feed, stating *soon (tm)* but nothing more specific than that unfortunately :(
As for FiS/WiS correlation, I have one analogy to make, Star Trek. In the course of Star Trek History (especially TNG), how many actual battles took place vs. how many scenes in the Holodeck, Captain's Quarters, Med Bay, 10 Forward, etc. actually happened? I KNOW YOU ARE GONNA SAY, "BUT THIS ISN'T STAR TREK, THIS IS EVE!" I know, I know, but every space themed Media is different, as an example. SWG is different from SW movies, SWTOR is different from SW Movies AND SWG. Star Trek is different from SW, Freelancer is different from the above, Dark Star One is different, etc. Just because they add Incarna, doesn't mean that you cannot fly in space, though integral as it may be, it's just another feature, and one that it seems to be pushed towards "incomplete" as per Faction Warfare, etc. |

Gwenywell Shumuku
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:21:00 -
[63] - Quote
Aldan Romar wrote:Gwenywell Shumuku wrote:... they have to deliver ... Deliver what, exactly? The state of some people's mind at the moment would have them scream whatever CCP says, as well as scream when CCP doesn't say anything - I know what I would do as a company in that situation... CCP is not going to turn back time and not going to abandon their business plans. They may change some details, but that's about it. I think we should be happy that they try to listen at all.
At this point? ANYTHING at all. They arn't able to deliver even their own stuff (like, Incarna CQs) in the timeframe they set themselves.
1 room for 7 months of developement? Apocrypha was done in 5 months (yes, from announcing it to release). |

Cailais
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
23
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:30:00 -
[64] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
The CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns like lack of communication from the Devs with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting about poor communication itself because it is heavily NDA'd so we're not allowed to communicate it, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned. We actually wont be able to communicate anything about that either of course.
Stay tuned...to Static FM!
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6
Just fixed that for you.
C.
|

Lens Thirring
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:30:00 -
[65] - Quote
Two step wrote:Lens Thirring wrote:Two step wrote:We all wish we could say more, but the rules are the rules. You could tell us what you proposed. No, I can't tell you what we proposed. Even things that I say to CCP can be covered by the NDA. So this week the CSM asked for the support of players who are not actually allowed to know specifically what they're supporting, in a campaign that will anyway be carried out behind closed doors. Understood.
You woke me up for this?
Quote: Again, our role is not to tell CCP who to hire or who to make work weekends. We are dissatisfied with the current level of staffing on FiS, and we want CCP to change that. Adding a single person would be good, switching the entire company over to working on EVE would be better. Hopefully we will end up somewhere in between.
I see. You would like "more" and don't have a specific proposal. In that case, I expect you will indeed get what you have asked for. Congratulations.
Quote: My own ideas on what should be added are irrelevant.
Then who's ideas are relevant? You're on the CSM negotiating with CCP, right? We're not allowed to know, right? I hope somebody's ideas are relevant, but I guess they're staying way the f**k away from this empty thread. |

Khira Kitamatsu
114
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:32:00 -
[66] - Quote
Oh look another carrot on a stick. Joy! Ponies!-á We need more ponies! |

Mortimer Civeri
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:37:00 -
[67] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online) and, despite Gridlock and Team BFF's efforts, general stagnation when it comes to fixes and improvements, the CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6
So are the minutes going to be released in 3-4 months?
|

Lorren Canada
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
26
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:41:00 -
[68] - Quote
Nerf the NDA |

Kazanir Valjean
Padded Helmets
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:44:00 -
[69] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:The Mittani wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:You know, your proposals to CCP would not be covered by the NDA if you told us what they were BEFORE you talked to CCP. We've made no secret about CSM6's desire to see more resources allocated to FiS. I'm not sure what part of our message you didn't understand from the blizzard of media coverage, podcasts, blogs, and CSM member posts during this controversy. You can lead a poster to the internet, but you can't make him r>c>p. The details is what I don't understand. Like how much effort you propose to be shifted, what you propose to do with incarna (have it become yet another abandoned feature?) and so on. Do you think that eve should get more funding that the income from subscriptions and PLEX sales? If the money being spent of FiS is equal to the subscriptions, is it OK for CCP to spend money on WiS, Dust, Wod?
It seems likely that they aren't at that stage yet. A cursory review of CCP's financial statements shows that the vast majority of EVE's income is going towards developing things that are not spaceships. There is a lot of "extra" money being thrown into that stuff ALSO -- obviously without Dust, Carbon, WoD, and Incarna CCP wouldn't have millions and millions of dollars in lines of credit or venture capital to be spending on new code. But a huge portion of the "money from EVE subs" is paying for developing stuff that is not "EVE" as we know it.
The CSM is probably just at the stage where they get a commitment from CCP that this is going to change for the next several expansions, without any discussion of monetary details. Discussion of numbers of assigned development teams is much more likely, but obviously more vague than what you're looking for. Furthermore, it is likely that the CSM didn't have any such metrics in mind going into their meeting, or they would have talked about them in more detail. :P |

HaxTis
Masters of Our Fate Screaming Meercats
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:47:00 -
[70] - Quote
this is such a pointless thread on the part of the csm. i think your just trying to stay relivant in this word of forums. as a long term player i have never seen you or heard of you. so how you got that position is pretty clear. but to make a thread where all you basically say is well we talked to ccp but cant talk about the talk, is a very pointless waste of time. thank you for pointing out your uslessness and the csm complete and utter failure |
|

Trebor Daehdoow
Sane Industries Inc.
80
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:51:00 -
[71] - Quote
Guys, there is nothing any of us can say at this point more than what we've said.
But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS. CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM bl... |

Takamori Maruyama
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:53:00 -
[72] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Guys, there is nothing any of us can say at this point more than what we've said.
But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS.
I know there is the contract etc etc...
But still , its a hell of a cblock |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
130
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:55:00 -
[73] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Guys, there is nothing any of us can say at this point more than what we've said.
But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS.
It's better to give us what information that you can than no information at all. I trust you will once again reiterate to CCP that clear honest communications with their customers will always yield better results than evasion, spin or turtling up.
PS It must be frustrating to have to reiterate this same basic lesson over and over again...
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal made on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. |

Dex Ironmind
Vorpal's Edge
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:55:00 -
[74] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Guys, there is nothing any of us can say at this point more than what we've said.
But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS.
Your efforts are certainly appreciated Trebor. Keep it up. Hopefully they will actually EXPAND FIS with this "EXPANSION," and not merely PATCH it.
By the way, can you express a bit of concern with them about this "REDISTRIBUTION" concept. You guys will only jump out of the frying pan into the fire if they push that nonsense. EXPAND, don't REDISTRIBUTE!!!
Thanks again!! Dex was here.  |

Cailais
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
23
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 19:56:00 -
[75] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Guys, there is nothing any of us can say at this point more than what we've said.
Which wasn't anything.
But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS.
This concept of 'communication' - it doesn't translate into Icelandic well?
C.
|

Smoking Blunts
18
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:01:00 -
[76] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Guys, there is nothing any of us can say at this point more than what we've said.
But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS.
the work you guys do is great on the whole. but posting a teaser topic rather than the actual outcome just comes over as a bit lame.
i wanna see results from ccp, not teasers about how 'we have chatted'. been told enough CCP bull over the years there words mean nothing, its there actions that count CCP-áare full of words and no action. We watch what they do and its nothing but false statements and lies.
|

Sister Bliss
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:02:00 -
[77] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Guys, there is nothing any of us can say at this point more than what we've said.
But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS.
Lobbying for CCP to focus on FIS is virtually too late. The pertinent time was last July when CCP announced their plans for 2011 which (disgracefully) had nothing to do with FIS at all.
It's disappointing to see it has taken over a year for everyone (and the CSM) to understand the gravest concerns have nothing to do with Barbie or NeX. The issue is and always has been broken core gameplay of the FIS variety. Fussing with emergency summits to tackle reaction to NeX garbage is like rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic. |

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
The I and F Taxation Trust
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:10:00 -
[78] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online) and, despite Gridlock and Team BFF's efforts, general stagnation when it comes to fixes and improvements, the CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6
Let me guess: They will do something to appease to 0.0 whiners, right? Me faltan palabras para expresar mi emoci+¦n.  |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:11:00 -
[79] - Quote
HaxTis wrote:this is such a pointless thread on the part of the csm. i think your just trying to stay relivant in this word of forums. as a long term player i have never seen you or heard of you. so how you got that position is pretty clear. but to make a thread where all you basically say is well we talked to ccp but cant talk about the talk, is a very pointless waste of time. thank you for pointing out your uslessness and the csm complete and utter failure
And if they DIDN'T say that they had just concluded a meeting with CCP, than everyone would be screaming that the CSM is impotent and sitting around doing nothing.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with saying "We've had a meeting, we're writing it up. Stay tuned" .
As much as I respect the CSM for their efforts and for putting up with all the player hate while they try to drag CCP's focus back onto spaceships, at the same time there is a certain irony about all this populist demand for new content in a game that sells itself as a sandbox, rather than a vehicle for ongoing content deployment.
As I listened to Mittani speak during the recent FunkyBacon radio special, I couldn't help but think - "Really? The real issue that is stagnating nullsec is lack of a reason to fight?"
As a lifelong lowsec enthusiast and Faction Warfare veteran, this was a little odd to hear. CCP hasn't given us any updates in years, and the scene is still alive and active. Militia pilots have never waited for added content to keep them from getting out and into a fight - a tiny bit of RP zest and some lasting friendships are enough to keep us dropping fleets of all variants and sizes on each other week after week - its a shame the jaded nullsec vets don't have the same positive attitude and need mawr carrots to march onward.
Also mentioned was how much of a pain it is to deal with Sovereignty changes, the boring nature of siege warfare (the structure popping kind), etc. Again, all reasons why those of us in militia have always enjoyed the scene - we have all the fun of extremely talented pew pilots in gangs of all sizes, without any of the headaches Mittani spoke of. It is also why most of the miltia vets who "graduate" into an alliance eventually get bored and come back home.
So yes, this is a bit of a promo for the FW scene, but also a call to players to take control themselves - come up with new things to try, pick a fight with someone new, make it senseless and fun - you DONT have to let CCP keep you from having a good time!
Here you can see what we've been up to in FW!! You know, the feature that was "abandoned" and "died" years ago :) |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
413
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:16:00 -
[80] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:Its really funny how the CSM brags how influential you all are in your blogs but when you get called on it on the forums, suddenly you dont have any power
I am known throughout EVE for my utter lack of power, influence, or any understanding of politics. You got me! |
|

Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
53
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:16:00 -
[81] - Quote
Sister Bliss wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Guys, there is nothing any of us can say at this point more than what we've said.
But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS. Lobbying for CCP to focus on FIS is virtually too late. The pertinent time was last July when CCP announced their plans for 2011 which (disgracefully) had nothing to do with FIS at all. It's disappointing to see it has taken over a year for everyone (and the CSM) to understand the gravest concerns have nothing to do with Barbie or NeX. The issue is and always has been broken core gameplay of the FIS variety. Fussing with emergency summits to tackle reaction to NeX garbage is like rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic.
I made myself pretty clear on my stance on things in my blog a couple days ago. This meeting was something of a surprise and the content of it was enough to convince me that CCP is taking the concerns of the CSM and the players very seriously. Beyond that I cannot say more.
I know it's hard for people to accept but we are pushing very hard for complete and solid information to be passed along to the players as quickly as possible. We are scheduled to have another meeting soon and the CSM will continue to push for MORE SPACESHIPS and less Incarna Catwalks.  Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. |

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:31:00 -
[82] - Quote
So where are them minutes to the summit meeting in july?
You see I actually think its time for us to look at what has been done in the last three months,
No change in hanger functionality, "ship spinning". No change in pricing of nex. No improvement with communication. Ridiculously sparse devblogs combined with dissapearing acts from the devs. No content or improvements to gameplay in expansions. Failure to deliver the racial captains quarters as promised, manipulation of the july minutes creating yet another point of conflict and leading to a failure to release tehm. functionality such as fittings taken away so they can be charged for later. QEN's cancelled.
What was it hilmar said, now is the time we look at what the players do and not what they say? well the players are voting with their subs and logging off. CCP has done nothing since the july summit in any of the areas they promised they would try to improve.
So as for this little meeting yeah Ive heard it all before, mittens is deluded anyway but the rest of the CSM being so suckered by yet another "emergency meeting" is actually a dissapointment. I thought they had more intelligence than to fall for the same bull twice.
|

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
413
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:33:00 -
[83] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:So where are them minutes to the summit meeting in july?
You see I actually think its time for us to look at what has been done in the last three months,
No change in hanger functionality, "ship spinning". No change in pricing of nex. No improvement with communication. Ridiculously sparse devblogs combined with dissapearing acts from the devs. No content or improvements to gameplay in expansions. Failure to deliver the racial captains quarters as promised, manipulation of the july minutes creating yet another point of conflict and leading to a failure to release tehm. functionality such as fittings taken away so they can be charged for later. QEN's cancelled.
What was it hilmar said, now is the time we look at what the players do and not what they say? well the players are voting with their subs and logging off. CCP has done nothing since the july summit in any of the areas they promised they would try to improve.
So as for this little meeting yeah Ive heard it all before, mittens is deluded anyway but the rest of the CSM being so suckered by yet another "emergency meeting" is actually a dissapointment. I thought they had more intelligence than to fall for the same bull twice.
you cast aspersions about intelligence, but haven't even noticed that the minutes you complain about have already been released~ |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:35:00 -
[84] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Temulkar Blaine wrote:So where are them minutes to the summit meeting in july?
You see I actually think its time for us to look at what has been done in the last three months,
No change in hanger functionality, "ship spinning". No change in pricing of nex. No improvement with communication. Ridiculously sparse devblogs combined with dissapearing acts from the devs. No content or improvements to gameplay in expansions. Failure to deliver the racial captains quarters as promised, manipulation of the july minutes creating yet another point of conflict and leading to a failure to release tehm. functionality such as fittings taken away so they can be charged for later. QEN's cancelled.
What was it hilmar said, now is the time we look at what the players do and not what they say? well the players are voting with their subs and logging off. CCP has done nothing since the july summit in any of the areas they promised they would try to improve.
So as for this little meeting yeah Ive heard it all before, mittens is deluded anyway but the rest of the CSM being so suckered by yet another "emergency meeting" is actually a dissapointment. I thought they had more intelligence than to fall for the same bull twice.
you cast aspersions about intelligence, but haven't even noticed that the minutes you complain about have already been released~
Here, let me be helpful for a change.
Summit Minutes To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:36:00 -
[85] - Quote
I bow to your superiority mittens!
and the rest of the point i mentioned?
|

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:37:00 -
[86] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:So where are them minutes to the summit meeting in july?
.......ummmmmm...... here??
|

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
413
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:41:00 -
[87] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:I bow to your superiority mittens!
and the rest of the point i mentioned?
The rest, frankly, I agree with. There is no 'red meat' from the CSM yet because the expansions we've got our handprints all over come in Winter. So there's not much utility we can demonstrate to the playerbase yet in terms of raw gameplay changes, because the Incarna stuff was already in development/heavy production before we took office, and is still sort of looming over us like a bad hangover. Sure, there's devblogs about TiDi and commitments from CCP about 'no gold ammo', but codewise all we've got thus far is the removal of the ship change session timer.
If things are implemented as planned at the moment, by the CSM7 election no one sensible will doubt the power or scope of the CSM. However, right now, before the next expansion, it's just pretty words. |

Alpheias
58
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:42:00 -
[88] - Quote
Soi Mala wrote:Why oh why is this company so scared of committing to anything?
Because this company thinks of themselves as a mix between Zynga and Facebook.
GÖ½ When your ship gets blown to bits GÖ½ And you lose your Faction fits \Gÿ+/ Don't worry GÖ¬ GÖ½ GÖ¬ GÖ½ GÖ½ GÖ¬ GÖ½ GÖ¬ Be Happy \Gÿ+/ |

Grimpak
Midnight Elites Echelon Rising
37
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:46:00 -
[89] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:Soi Mala wrote:Why oh why is this company so scared of committing to anything?
Because this company thinks of themselves as a mix between Zynga and Facebook.
ICE BURN! [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |

Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:47:00 -
[90] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:More vague promises.
Praise the NDA!
IMO, NDAs are actually quite useful. It is because the CSM operates under a NDA that discussions between the CSM and CCP can be unfiltered. If there were no NDA between CCP and the CSM, meaningful and frank discussion between the two would not be possible.
It is much better to have player representatives tell us that a discussion is taking place, as opposed to not knowing if CCP even realizes what players are complaining about.
Sure, we have no idea if CCP will actually alter their strategies with relation to said discussion, but at least we know that they can't claim ignorance. |
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:47:00 -
[91] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:I bow to your superiority mittens!
and the rest of the point i mentioned?
Oh, let me take a stab at this...
Quote:No change in hanger functionality, "ship spinning". No change in pricing of nex. No improvement with communication. Ridiculously sparse devblogs combined with dissapearing acts from the devs. No content or improvements to gameplay in expansions. Failure to deliver the racial captains quarters as promised, manipulation of the july minutes creating yet another point of conflict and leading to a failure to release tehm. functionality such as fittings taken away so they can be charged for later. QEN's cancelled.
The new version of Ship Spinning, as stupid as that whole point is, will have to be coded. They said up front that this would take time to complete. What part of that did you not understand?
No changes in the prices in the NeX were promised, quite the opposite. However they did release more reasonably priced items than before, which was promised.
Dev Blogs tend to get a little sparse when people are on vacation. Right now work for the Winter release is just being organized and begun, it's a bit early to be making large scale commitments to much of anything.
There has been a lot of content added with the last couple of expansions, just not what you personally would prefer apparently.
Racial captains quarters were to be released sometime between now and this Winter. Personally, if they have to delay this to get things working better, I'm fine with that.
The minutes are out.
Charging for fittings is coming? I (and everyone else) must have missed the memo. 
QEN's are being put on a different release schedule. Same content but you really can't call them QEN's if the aren't quarterly now can you...
That do for a start?  To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:49:00 -
[92] - Quote
The Mittani wrote: There is no 'red meat' from the CSM yet because the expansions we've got our handprints all over come in Winter. So there's not much utility we can demonstrate to the playerbase yet in terms of raw gameplay changes, because the Incarna stuff was already in development/heavy production before we took office, and is still sort of looming over us like a bad hangover. Sure, there's devblogs about TiDi and commitments from CCP about 'no gold ammo', but codewise all we've got thus far is the removal of the ship change session timer.
This makes complete sense, and I'll be the first to step up and say, I buy that answer.
Looking forward to winter, keep up the good fight. Dont let the angry mobs get you down.
|

Sister Bliss
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:51:00 -
[93] - Quote
forums ate my post, fuckit |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
413
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:51:00 -
[94] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:The Mittani wrote: There is no 'red meat' from the CSM yet because the expansions we've got our handprints all over come in Winter. So there's not much utility we can demonstrate to the playerbase yet in terms of raw gameplay changes, because the Incarna stuff was already in development/heavy production before we took office, and is still sort of looming over us like a bad hangover. Sure, there's devblogs about TiDi and commitments from CCP about 'no gold ammo', but codewise all we've got thus far is the removal of the ship change session timer. This makes complete sense, and I'll be the first to step up and say, I buy that answer. Looking forward to winter, keep up the good fight. Dont let the angry mobs get you down.
It's all good. Not only am I incredibly arrogant, but my power-base in nullsec is quite happy with the work we've done thus far; a few random tinfoilers on these forums (as opposed to kugu, where most null folks hang out) is no big deal. |

dgastuffz
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:51:00 -
[95] - Quote
i dont believe anything what csm or ccp say i watch what they do |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
130
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:55:00 -
[96] - Quote
Sister Bliss wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Guys, there is nothing any of us can say at this point more than what we've said.
But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS. Lobbying for CCP to focus on FIS is virtually too late...
What else should the CSM do?
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal made on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. |

Dah Lek
Hedion University Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 20:59:00 -
[97] - Quote
This isn't mine, but it does a great job of describing how folks feel:
Rage!
Sing, Godess, the rage of Gianturco's son Mittani; who brought forth a sea of discontent to break against the rocky shoals of Reykjavik, and stirred the hearts of capsuleers to rebellion against the fair-haired masters of New Eden.
Sing of Mittani's coming unto the hall where Hilmar, astride his lofty throne, surveyed his realm with troubled brow.
"I'faith," quoth Hilmar, "What is this rabble gathered before my corporate gates? Who are these scabbed dogs, who creep their bellies 'pon the ground, yet seek to turn mine noble hand to do their churlish bidding? Why stand they thus, all armed with flaming brand and sharp-tined pitchfork?"
"They are thy customers," answered Mittani, lord of spies. "Unto thee and thine they pay a monthly tithe, in return for which they deem their satisfaction must needs be thine fondest desire."
"Wherefore, their discontent?" rumbled Hilmar "In what wise unsatisfied? Have I not bestowed upon them worlds and ships in space that they might strive mightily, one against the other? Do I not provide all manner of digital fashion-wear for their purchase? And yet still unsatisfied, you say?"
"Aye," said proud-eyed Mittani. "And vexed full sore, both by the misdeeds of your minions and your own sad neglect of their plight. Long have supercapital blobs driven honest capsuleers from their holdings while you dallied with first person shooters. Long have ships in space languished, falling ever farther from balance while your minions sought the bright gold of Microtransactions at your behest."
At this fair-haired Hilmar grew wroth, and smote the arm of his throne, saying:
"What doth these knaves think $14.95 a month buyeth them, the keys to the executive privy chamber? They canst not see the big picture. How shall I prosper from this venture lest there be Microtransactions? Whither else my looked for profit margins? Thou, Mittani, thou art mine elected herald to this unwashed mob. Thou shouldst have explained all to them ere now and counseled them to patience against the coming of a better day."
"I?" spoke the sly Mittani, a modest hand upon his breast. "Nay, storied son of Petur, thou dost misconstrue both my purpose and my place. I am not come to dismiss the host before you, for I have led them hither. Neither shall I quench the fire in their hearts for your pleasure, for I am its author."
"Cruel treachery then!" cried Hilmar. "Have I not played host to thee many times; brought thee across the sea's broad back to Reykjavik? Have I not feted thee with fine bacon and pretended to give ear to thine counsel, all at great expense? This is vile payment for favors past."
"Bacon eaten is bacon beyond the reach of regret," said wily Mittani. "Yet nay, no treachery here. For though I am bound by thy NDA, I am by this 'rabble' elected; to speak for them, not for thee. If I partook of thy bacon, 'twas done on their behalf."
"And yet it fattened none but thee," mused Hilmar. "Tell me in sooth, lord of Goons; who is thy true master in these matters twixt us; this mob of paltry tithers, or thine own self?
"Like unto a slate grey sea under a leaden sky, I cannot see the end of one and the beginning of the other," answered the master of metagame." The twain are as one. If you heed my words and see to their needs, thus my name shall grow. An' you not heed my words I shall speak loudly unto thee, and lo, even unto the media outlets until you relent and bend to my will. Then shall my name grow larger still."
"But how if I do not bend?" quoth Hilmar, his voice like thunder. "New Eden is mine, yea down to the its tiniest nanoship and humblest pubbie. Naught avails there but I decree it. The council of stellar managers manages naught but what I deem meet and proper. Vex me not lest I disband it; casting you and your troublesome ilk into the outer darkness!"
Wily Mittani answered Hilmar, all untroubled.
"Remember my repute among thy customer base. I have the ear of many; yea even my enemies listen to my counsel. So too the gaming magazines, who hunger ever for the content of discord, give me heed. Bend not, and I shall bring down 'pon you a great storm of rage-quitting. I shall tell stories to the media that will hearten your enemies and make your investors quail. Then shall the very stars of New Eden flicker and go dark, and with them all your ill-starred designs."
"Nay," quoth Hilmar. "If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave. Thus unvexed, I shall have Microtransactions and the storied wealth they bestow. Yea, even unto golden ammunition should I desire it. Then I shall no longer be hostage to those who tithe but a monthly pittance, yet seek to make themselves my master."
At this, Mittani did but smile and turn to leave.
"You have no power or desire to lay New Eden low," unbending Hilmar called after him. "And even didst thou, it is the stage 'pon which your own reputation struts. Turn off New Eden's lights and you likewise stand in darkness. Where, Mittani, would you go, New Eden having fallen?"
The Mittani paused, and turning unto Hilmar spoke thusly:
"There are other worlds than thine. If New Eden falls, I will lead my minions forth and play at World of Tanks."
"Tanks?" cried proud Hilmar, "Tanks?!"
The assembled host bowed and answered him as one.
"You are welcome, Hilmar."
From: http://fiddlersedge.blogspot.com/2011/09/fever-dream.html |

Joe D'Trader
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
15
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 21:11:00 -
[98] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online) and, despite Gridlock and Team BFF's efforts, general stagnation when it comes to fixes and improvements, the CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6
I do appreciate the CSM and Gridlock and BFFs efforts. But you do realize you didn't tell us anything?
In the future please do make some effort to have a quick 2 sentence none NDA report that can be told to us.
Keep working on making FIS (You know Eve Online) the best game it can be. |

Riggs Droput
Mad Bombers Guns and Alcohol
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 21:11:00 -
[99] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:I bow to your superiority mittens!
and the rest of the point i mentioned?
Nothing happens in an instant, especially when it comes to games. The CSM6 EVE will be the EVE we are playing next year, right now we are stuck with the CSM5 EVE, and CCP's barbie doll simulator.
The CSM like any real life group of people who are supposed to represent the people, your always cleaning up the mess the last group left. Yet you take all the blame for it.
I have faith in the CSM to try get EVE back to a game that I am willing on logging in to play, when this will happen I don't know.
Keep up the good work CSM's I have faith in you.
Riggs |

Khira Kitamatsu
114
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 21:17:00 -
[100] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Guys, there is nothing any of us can say at this point more than what we've said.
But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS.
More like on behalf of the people that play in null-sec. Ponies!-á We need more ponies! |
|

Khira Kitamatsu
114
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 21:22:00 -
[101] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Sister Bliss wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Guys, there is nothing any of us can say at this point more than what we've said.
But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS. Lobbying for CCP to focus on FIS is virtually too late. The pertinent time was last July when CCP announced their plans for 2011 which (disgracefully) had nothing to do with FIS at all. It's disappointing to see it has taken over a year for everyone (and the CSM) to understand the gravest concerns have nothing to do with Barbie or NeX. The issue is and always has been broken core gameplay of the FIS variety. Fussing with emergency summits to tackle reaction to NeX garbage is like rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic. I made myself pretty clear on my stance on things in my blog a couple days ago. This meeting was something of a surprise and the content of it was enough to convince me that CCP is taking the concerns of the CSM and the players very seriously. Beyond that I cannot say more. I know it's hard for people to accept but we are pushing very hard for complete and solid information to be passed along to the players as quickly as possible. We are scheduled to have another meeting soon and the CSM will continue to push for MORE NULL-SEC and WORMHOLE changes and less Incarna Catwalks. 
Fixed it for you.
Ponies!-á We need more ponies! |

Helena Russell Makanen
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 21:28:00 -
[102] - Quote
The Mittani wrote: If things are implemented as planned at the moment, by the CSM7 election no one sensible will doubt the power or scope of the CSM.
I am sorry but that statement made me literally laugh out loud. So if anything in the upcoming expansion is 'good' it is due to the 'power' of the CSM? I am sure the developers and idea-men at CCP thank God the CSM exists lol.
|

RougeOperator
Autocannons Anonymous
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 21:36:00 -
[103] - Quote
I find that fact the minutes were put out and most people still don't know about them is just more of CCPs now famously bad communication skills.
I mean come on guys get it together. Your a world wide company. Try to act like it. Stop making the CSM do your work and take the brunt of your mistakes. I have my issues with the CSM and how it works and how people get elected. But im more sickened by they fact CCP is clearly putting them out in front of the mob so unfairly on so many issues.
Though i can say some CSM members are just tossing gas on the fire half the time. |

Kengutsi Akira
GloboTech Industries
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 21:46:00 -
[104] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:The Mittani wrote:we'll be relaxing the media pressure for now. Take that for what you will.
Why do I have the possible feeling legal measures and/or bannings were threatened lol From the available evidence, because you're not too bright and twist everything to fit your pre-conceived worldview?
lol yeah.. Mittens is all gun ho "letsd get the media in on this" then a few days later slams on the breaks cause CCP agreed to a meeting
thats takes a lotta twisting to see what happened there
|

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 21:50:00 -
[105] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Guys, there is nothing any of us can say at this point more than what we've said.
But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS. More like on behalf of the people that play in null-sec.
If you've been playing the game at all you'd realize what happens in nullsec affects empire, and vice versa. This game has many similarities to a functioning ecology - remove one species or poison one habitat and the whole chain is disrupted. I simply dont buy that you can fight for change in one area of eve and not have repercussions elsewhere. It is NO coincidence that amidst all the hubbub about nullsec stagnation, we are seeing a spike in lowsec of displaced and bored alliances going on the roam and searching inward for fights, isk, and lulz.
This is why contrary to public outrage, I don't see Dust 514 as a giant "distraction" from Eve Online in the slightest. When Dust 514 is deployed, it will change the game for everyone in a way that no other recent expansion has impacted the space ship world. Be patient people, and you'll see that Dust is a "FiS" expansion as much as it is "just another console shooter".
Implementing planetary fighting and directly tying it to system sovereignty will change the way alliances fight wars, add new strategic depth, force increased cooperation and social networking, and give ships like Dreadnoughts a new purpose, and draw space ship battles to new locations (response fleets to planetary bombardment come to mind).
I get irritated when people talk about Dust like its somehow a detriment to Eve Online - its like they have no idea what CCP is trying to do here and don't have an ounce of creative thinking in them to see where this could take us all. All they see is "OMGIDONTWANNABUYAPS3GIMMEMAWRSHIPS"
|

Olleybear
I R' Carebear
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 21:59:00 -
[106] - Quote
Dah Lek wrote:This isn't mine, but it does a great job of describing how folks feel: Rage! Sing, Godess, the rage of Gianturco's son Mittani; who brought forth a sea of discontent to break against the rocky shoals of Reykjavik, and stirred the hearts of capsuleers to rebellion against the fair-haired masters of New Eden. From: http://fiddlersedge.blogspot.com/2011/09/fever-dream.html
Just had to say I loved reading that post. Thanks for posting it here and thanks to the original author for writing it.
|

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:01:00 -
[107] - Quote
RougeOperator wrote:I find that fact the minutes were put out and most people still don't know about them is just more of CCPs now famously bad communication skills.
I mean come on guys get it together. Your a world wide company. Try to act like it. Stop making the CSM do your work and take the brunt of your mistakes. I have my issues with the CSM and how it works and how people get elected. But im more sickened by they fact CCP is clearly putting them out in front of the mob so unfairly on so many issues.
Though i can say some CSM members are just tossing gas on the fire half the time.
How did they fail in communicating this? It is at the top of the Dev Blog list, (the same one where you would go on the eve website where they always are). They prominently posted about it on their wall on facebook. CCP staff tweeted its arrival. CSM tweeted its arrival. I'm sure the next time they send out a newsletter, it will be mentioned there too. People are simply being ******** and raging about things without checking their facts first.
Rouge, stop hanging around all this depressing forum chatter and come fly with your corpmates again, we've missed you! I thought you had unsubbed and MIA until I saw your posting. If you have an account active (i'm assuming you do since you're posting), come fly with us :-) We're having just as much fun as we always have had....whether CCP or CSM has anything to say about it one way or another. |

Cipher Jones
36
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:04:00 -
[108] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:Two step wrote:We all wish we could say more, but the rules are the rules. the same argument used in the other thread. Out of curiosity, your NDA doesnt have a clause noting you arent allowed to refer to the NDA in the manner you all have been? I know the one for SWTOR does an just so you know, what this truly says is "Im glad we have a NDA so we can point to it and shrug mysteriously"
I have had the pleasure to ask them things in the past, but never got a reply. Then I started getting snide towards people who couldn't really centralize their anger. Then when I started to get thousands of views, I got called a troll, and now even the CSM say so.
Yet it always seems to come down to no real content in the rebuttal. Like I said, if you cant refute what the "trolls" say, but take the time to call them out, you might as well but your fingers in your ear and go LALALALALALALALALALALALA all the way home.
I never even got the NDA excuse till today.
The bottom line is this;
Nothing has changed since Incarna except bug fixes, and the PCU. Weather or not an NDA has something to do with it at this point, no one really cares. Promising to communicate better and then not delivering is just that (@CCP not CSM).
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:15:00 -
[109] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Vicar2008 wrote:No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said. Check out the last Dev blogs, plenty of words, no real Comming up content with changes/number crunching etc. It's not a bone being thrown. Meetings like this one, when they reach their conclusion, take the form of a devblog and CSM posts. I believed it important for you to know that discussion is underway to address the problems, even if I can't disclose in what way yet. Just stop right now.
Dev blogs that may or may not produce results and which are filled with half-promises that are twisted later on to suit CCP's 100% non-customer focused agenda? CSM posts that blow more smoke up CCP's a.s.s than an Icelandic volcanic erruption?
CCP's and the CSM's words hold as much credibility as the 2008-era Icelandic economic and banking systems.
The ONLY proof is delivered, bug-free and playable content. After all, I am not paying my subscription fees to be told that there are nifty things in the pipeline. I am paying for great fun with mates via the service provided when I log in each day. 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters |

Grimpak
Midnight Elites Echelon Rising
37
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:19:00 -
[110] - Quote
to be honest, and replying in a manner that doesn't insult anyone (yes I know, this is the internets, you can insult people here simply by posting an image of a cat and a dog hugging each other): I'm more interested in the :action: and not in the :words:, so until **** happens, I'll be watching. [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |
|

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
413
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:29:00 -
[111] - Quote
I don't think the CSM is suggesting that we should ever back away from "actions, not words". Meissa was simply informing the players, as best he can through the NDA, what has taken place - an act of information, not persuasion.
"a thing happened" is not the same as "EVERYTHING IS PEACHY LOVE THE CSM LOVE CCP."
|

AnzacPaul
Perkone Caldari State
77
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:32:00 -
[112] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:
It's not a bone being thrown. Meetings like this one, when they reach their conclusion, take the form of a devblog and CSM posts. I believed it important for you to know that discussion is underway to address the problems, even if I can't disclose in what way yet.
What in 6 months?
How bout starting with the minutes of the last meeting before you start on a new one? |

Grimpak
Midnight Elites Echelon Rising
37
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:33:00 -
[113] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:I don't think the CSM is suggesting that we should ever back away from "actions, not words". Meissa was simply informing the players, as best he can through the NDA, what has taken place - an act of information, not persuasion.
"a thing happened" is not the same as "EVERYTHING IS PEACHY LOVE THE CSM LOVE CCP."
oh I'm not saying otherwise. it's good to keep us informed.
but I prefer to wait for :action: before I start throwing a party. [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |

Trebor Daehdoow
Sane Industries Inc.
80
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:34:00 -
[114] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS. More like on behalf of the people that play in null-sec. While I've spent a lot of time in nullsec, I've never been a sov-warfare guy, and most of my activities these days are in hisec and wormhole space. There are similarly several CSM members who are very active and very non-nullsec.
Right now the fight is to try and get CCP to devote more resources to EVE, and in that fight I am 100% behind Mittens and the rest of the CSM.
And then, if we do get some more resources, being behind Mittens, I'll be perfectly placed to stab him in the back if need be to get those resources allocated to things I think are important -- like Dead Horse, Industry, UI to name a few.
Annoying, however, everyone on the CSM pretty much agrees these are top priorities, so I probably won't have the pleasure of sticking a spork in Mittens and twisting it. The sacrifices I make for you people...

CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM bl... |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
413
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:36:00 -
[115] - Quote
Dead Horse is one of those proposals that cuts across every corner of EVE, because everyone who has ever had to deal with one knows that POSes are utterly miserable. |

AnzacPaul
Perkone Caldari State
77
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:40:00 -
[116] - Quote
Did you manage to discuss where the EMERGENCY CSM MINUTES were?
EDIT: APPARENTLY RELEASED, LET ME GO READ |

Helena Russell Makanen
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:42:00 -
[117] - Quote
AnzacPaul wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:
It's not a bone being thrown. Meetings like this one, when they reach their conclusion, take the form of a devblog and CSM posts. I believed it important for you to know that discussion is underway to address the problems, even if I can't disclose in what way yet.
What in 6 months? How bout starting with the minutes of the last meeting before you start on a new one?
They were finally released earlier today. Over two months wait and nothing in it really.
|

Cearain
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
31
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:48:00 -
[118] - Quote
Two step wrote:..... I still favor the same stuff I favored when I ran for CSM, you can see details on that in my blog (linked in my signature). In general, the CSM is all in agreement that the *critical* issue right now is balance (especially supercaps, but including all ships), and we would like to see that fixed ASAP.
I agree with everything you said except this part. CCP already said they will nerf supercaps. I don't see ship balance as anything close to critical anymore. Tweaking ship stats is hardly important to me.
For me in low sec and FW are much more important. For the players as a whole there are too many things to mention that need work. So make sure you stay focused on getting more devs assigned to real eve and not side tracked to particular issues.
For example I saw they were going to try to get a mechanic in null sec where people can fly smaller ships. Well they already have that mechanic in eve, but it remains broken and abandonned. Faction War plexxing is a mechanic that if it was fixed correctly would allow players to fly all sorts of small ships in very small groups and be effective for a larger end. Its all set and ready to go it just needs some fixing. This would be much more important to me than tweaking ship stats.
I don't want this to turn into what particular issue should be taken up first or what is more important. The important thing is to focus on getting more devs working on real eve so *everyone* can look forward to fixes that are long overdue.
I'm sure you guys on csm agree. I just wanted to post to make sure you guys keep focused. Good work so far, and good luck at your meeting. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1329906
|

Kno Bodeesbitch
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:54:00 -
[119] - Quote
And all of the rest of the CSM who have been posting today. Thanks for taking it to them and good luck in your endeavors..I wont be one of the guys who trolls you for making a good faith effort to bring the issues to CCP's door.
Speaking of door....nah you know already 
|

Dex Ironmind
Vorpal's Edge
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 22:56:00 -
[120] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Dead Horse is one of those proposals that cuts across every corner of EVE, because everyone who has ever had to deal with one knows that POSes are utterly miserable.
That is the stuff I would like to see the CSM push for in EXPANSIONS - stuff "that cuts across every corner of EVE."
The rebalancing/nerfing/patching/fixing issues need to be reserved for in-between expansion actions.
I would really like to see the CSM press for some immediate patching/balancing implementations, freeing up the winter expansion for something that benefits all of EVE and does not mainly focus on NULL. Frankly, all of the sandbox is hungry for new toys to play with in the sandbox!!! Don't let the winter expansion be just you about the NULL boys and girls.
If null requires an entire expansion, as does low, let it come later. This next expansion needs to be a broad reaching expansion to score some points with their entire player base.
Dex was here.  |
|

Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
24
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 23:01:00 -
[121] - Quote
good news
hope more infos will be coming soon. (and "soon" != 2 months, in case CCP don't know) |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 23:06:00 -
[122] - Quote
Cearain wrote: For example I saw they were going to try to get a mechanic in null sec where people can fly smaller ships. Well they already have that mechanic in eve, but it remains broken and abandonned. Faction War plexxing is a mechanic that if it was fixed correctly would allow players to fly all sorts of small ships in very small groups and be effective for a larger end. Its all set and ready to go it just needs some fixing. This would be much more important to me than tweaking ship stats.
Here, here. Those of us in Faction Warfare know that it, in concept at least, is the answer to most of the gripes the nullsec crowd has had enough of.
We've been "ignored' for years now (at least publicity wise) because everyone assumes it is dead or full of noobs, both of which are very much not true.
FW has a thriving small ship pew pew scene, and it always has. Here you will find some of the best AF, inty, pirate frigate/cruiser pilots New Eden has to offer. And those of us that participate also know that ship balancing overall is not really a crisis issue. We've killed and been killed by just about every ship in the game, they all have their uses (except you, Mr. Breacher. You're a piece of crap and really are more of a badly assembled tent than a combat frigate. One of the few minmatar ships that lives up to its scrapheap stereotype)
We do however, gotta get the supercaps outta lowsec. My own militia has the upper hand here, and I still want them gone. (For those of you not familiar - the Minmatar Militia has a Supercap fleet, the Amarr do not, and thus resort to organizing Alliance batphone hotdrops before taking on any of our decent sized fleets these days, out of paranoia. We sit back and laugh when their own batphone caps turn on them after wiping us out, to further increase the killmail count. Its ridiculous.)
|

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
132
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 23:07:00 -
[123] - Quote
Dex Ironmind wrote:That is the stuff I would like to see the CSM push for in EXPANSIONS - stuff "that cuts across every corner of EVE." The rebalancing/nerfing/patching/fixing issues need to be reserved for in-between expansion actions. I would really like to see the CSM press for some immediate patching/balancing implementations, freeing up the winter expansion for something that benefits all of EVE and does not mainly focus on NULL. Frankly, all of the sandbox is hungry for new toys to play with in the sandbox!!! Don't let the winter expansion be just you about the NULL boys and girls. If null requires an entire expansion, as does low, let it come later. This next expansion needs to be a broad reaching expansion to score some points with their entire player base. Dex was here. 
Rebalancing/patching/fixing would be something for between the releases if there were not some core mechanics that are broken and whose fixes didn't require more time than is available between the releases. Ie, fixes become part of the content, unfortunately.
That said, to people who say it's out of self-interest we focussed on null the limited resources available, that's not true. I live in lowsec, I do mostly small/medium gang PvP and industry. The truth is, large conflicts fuel many things: player movement, ship/module needs (so industrialist have someone to sell their stuff to), they fuel also the player enthusiasm of players, their activity. Right now the decrease in activity in 0.0 is very severe, so things need to be adressed there. And in the meantime we'd like to provide something for industrialists who've been confined forever in highsec something else to look forward to. A shot at gaining more for a bit more risk, something PvEers and PvPers already possess.
Once the most pressing issues on that front are resolved, then I'd like to see lowsec addressed, for instance, and if new content can come, that'd be very welcome too (and by new content I mean adding to what already exists, but in depth, not in breadth). Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

AnzacPaul
Perkone Caldari State
77
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 23:09:00 -
[124] - Quote
@CSM, thanks for the minutes (at last). However, from those notes, it appears nothing is of concern at CCP. They don't admit to doing anything wrong at all, apart from bad communication with the CSM. They seem to have no problem deliberately putting nex items @ 3600, 100 aur above the amount required to purchase a plex. This is clearly a scam, no matter which way it is worded. I'm sure you all agree, i'm just confused atthe part where you think CCP are going to listen to you about something that they think isn't an issue? |

Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
24
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 23:15:00 -
[125] - Quote
Blah blah blah... Conclusion: If CCP fail to deliver on the winter expansion it is game over. Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook-á |

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
65
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 23:24:00 -
[126] - Quote
I almost wrote something meaningful, but because forum desided to instawipe my message when I gently pushed the post-button, that story can only be examined in bit heaven.
Oh well - only 3rd time that happened with this new "million manhour project". At least there wasn't error message - maybe that is good thing?
btw ppl... avoid posting percent signs to your messages as they seem to cause BBcode parser errors when quoting/editing .)
:excellence: unlimited. [red]This is one of the moments where we look at what CCP does and less of what they say. Innovation takes time to set in and the predictable reaction is always to resist change[/red] ^^ In old forums that text was red and we could post bunnies too. |

Gypsy RoseLee
Aliastra Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 23:31:00 -
[127] - Quote
Did it tickle when they blew smoke up your ***? 
Sorry, my three subscriptions won't be renewed until we get what Hilmar himself made very clear:
Quote:I can tell you that this is one of the moments where we look at what CCP Management DOES and LESS of what they SAY
Call me when I can actually play FIS fixes/improvements/expansions. Until then, not one god damn dime goes into your coffers. |

Dex Ironmind
Vorpal's Edge
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 23:36:00 -
[128] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Rebalancing/patching/fixing would be something for between the releases if there were not some core mechanics that are broken and whose fixes didn't require more time than is available between the releases. Ie, fixes become part of the content, unfortunately.
That said, to people who say it's out of self-interest we focussed on null the limited resources available, that's not true. I live in lowsec, I do mostly small/medium gang PvP and industry. The truth is, large conflicts fuel many things: player movement, ship/module needs (so industrialist have someone to sell their stuff to), they fuel also the player enthusiasm of players, their activity. Right now the decrease in activity in 0.0 is very severe, so things need to be adressed there. And in the meantime we'd like to provide something for industrialists who've been confined forever in highsec something else to look forward to. A shot at gaining more for a bit more risk, something PvEers and PvPers already possess.
Once the most pressing issues on that front are resolved, then I'd like to see lowsec addressed, for instance, and if new content can come, that'd be very welcome too (and by new content I mean adding to what already exists, but in depth, not in breadth).
That is a fair reply Meissa.
You guys are fighting the right fight right now. Get more CCP resources dedicated on EVE ... period!!!
If they do that, that will mean more fixes, more developers to generate new content, etc. I can get on board with that.
I am still not convinced of "the null sec drives EVE argument." If we look at the game that way, the game balance problems will never go away. Each area of EVE's space - HI, LOW, NULL and WH space - need equal attention. To neglect one, in favor of the others, will throw off a different type of balance than ship balance, or risk v. reward balance.
Mind you, I am not sold on the whole risk v. reward balance approach either. That still smacks of "herding" and "endgame" in my mind. That just doesn't translate in a sandbox. The more you do that, the more you are going to fuel things like super-alliances taking control of huge sectors of space, keeping the little guy out (if you give them more ISK to make, then the rich will only become richer). The more you do that, the more you will fuel super-cap warfare over sub-cap warfare (more ISK for bigger ships, right). Risk v. reward is a broken concept.
Focus on just giving NULL guys more things to do out there ... period ... at all levels (beginner, novice, vet). That is EXPANSION, not REDISTRIBUTION. I still say they should make NULL about EMPIRE building. Make the toys, missions, mining, etc. all about building EMPIRES out there and letting them fight over it. Make LOW about PIRACY! Make it the down and dirty part of space. Give pirates a haven and anti-pirates some vigilante work to do. Make HI about the four big empires.
Enough said... Thanks for the reply Meissa.
Dex was here.  |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
49
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 23:38:00 -
[129] - Quote
Vicar2008 wrote:No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said.
At least they are telling us that stuff is happening. I find it irritating when stuff happens and we hear nothing from CCP or CSM.
Hopefully we'll see more messaging from CSM and CCP in the future. Where messaging basically means "telegraphing our activities" without necessarily "narrating our activities". People who engage in hand-to-hand combat such as boxing, Karate or Tae Kwon Do will understand the difference between "telegraphing" and "narrating". It's the same principle as using your indicators when driving a car: you're not actually telling people where you're going, just that you're turning left.
So while "we're having a meeting" might not mean much in the grand scheme of things, it is a start. |

Rainus Max
Fusion Enterprises Ltd Morsus Mihi
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 23:48:00 -
[130] - Quote
Dex Ironmind wrote:The Mittani wrote:Dead Horse is one of those proposals that cuts across every corner of EVE, because everyone who has ever had to deal with one knows that POSes are utterly miserable. That is the stuff I would like to see the CSM push for in EXPANSIONS - stuff "that cuts across every corner of EVE." The rebalancing/nerfing/patching/fixing issues need to be reserved for in-between expansion actions. I would really like to see the CSM press for some immediate patching/balancing implementations, freeing up the winter expansion for something that benefits all of EVE and does not mainly focus on NULL. Frankly, all of the sandbox is hungry for new toys to play with in the sandbox!!! Don't let the winter expansion be just you about the NULL boys and girls. If null requires an entire expansion, as does low, let it come later. This next expansion needs to be a broad reaching expansion to score some points with their entire player base. Dex was here. 
I think the 0.0 changes coming are more needed that low sec, not because I'm in a 0.0 but because I have a reasonable understanding that 0.0 has a fairly hefty impact on empire and lowsec. I agree low sec needs a dam good boost but at a time when 0.0 is being devastated by (retrospectively) bad moves from CCP (Supercaps, Sov Mechanics etc) and a significant chunk of players are rapidly losing interest on both sides.
0.0 might not be important to you individually but if it doesnt get the viagra it needs then the bulk of players will get bored (you only have to look at the 'DRF wars' both sides are bored stupid of the same ending to a battle - except the Russian alliances, they are just in it for the bots), once they start to drop out it starts impacting what happens out there which then filters down and starts damaging empire ice mining, production, research, PI etc. Yes thats probably looking further ahead than Winter, but its better to start fixing those potential problems than 'waste' the effort buffing something that to be quite frankly doesn't have that big an impact on the overall running of Eve.
I will await the general flaming from low sec residents - but I will point out that I agree lowsec does need a overdose of viagra in the near future. |
|

Luckytania
Bullets of Justice
9
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 23:54:00 -
[131] - Quote
CSM, please don't forget bug stomping as something on the priority list. Closer to the top than the bottom. (Seleene, you'll get my vote if you run again on the "Iterations" platform.)
The paper cuts this week have been getting pretty deep.
e.g., - my drones still don't work consistently correctly (the little bastards) - last night, I couldn't even consistently get Projectile ammo type loaded/switched - my cargo hold window behavior is less satisfying than it was a week ago - I've now gotten into the habit of constantly checking that all my modules are still online - windows won't consistently dismiss when the close control is clicked
Yes, there are work arounds to all these. The point is that I'm now spending a significant amount of game time hitting 'paper cut' bumps and doing the work around rather than straight line playing. It breaks the game-play flow and creates frustration.
Just some irritations from the last couple of days. The full list is immense. |

XavierVE
Reasonable People Of Sound Mind
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.09 23:58:00 -
[132] - Quote
Subscriber drop has nothing to do with "flying in space", it has to do with people losing trust in CCP.
CCP's various so-called apologies haven't regained that trust. Only time will regain that trust, and a refocusing away from fleecing the playerbase back into entertaining the playerbase. Piddle Paddle with the CSM won't change the lack of trust people feel in CCP, both in terms of those who have left and those that are dejected over the debacles of the last few months and who are barely hanging on.
Real content will help mitigate the issue, but only time will win back the hearts and minds of those the company spit in the face of. |

Dex Ironmind
Vorpal's Edge
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 00:01:00 -
[133] - Quote
Rainus Max wrote:I think the 0.0 changes coming are more needed that low sec, not because I'm in a 0.0 but because I have a reasonable understanding that 0.0 has a fairly hefty impact on empire and lowsec. I agree low sec needs a dam good boost but at a time when 0.0 is being devastated by (retrospectively) bad moves from CCP (Supercaps, Sov Mechanics etc) and a significant chunk of players are rapidly losing interest on both sides.
0.0 might not be important to you individually but if it doesnt get the viagra it needs then the bulk of players will get bored (you only have to look at the 'DRF wars' both sides are bored stupid of the same ending to a battle - except the Russian alliances, they are just in it for the bots), once they start to drop out it starts impacting what happens out there which then filters down and starts damaging empire ice mining, production, research, PI etc. Yes thats probably looking further ahead than Winter, but its better to start fixing those potential problems than 'waste' the effort buffing something that to be quite frankly doesn't have that big an impact on the overall running of Eve.
I will await the general flaming from low sec residents - but I will point out that I agree lowsec does need a overdose of viagra in the near future.
I am a predominantly hi sec dweller, low sec roamer. You are correct to say NULL (in its current form) doesn't interest me. I don't disagree with you that NULL needs some serious attention. Senselessly beating up the same apparatus so you can install your own apparatus makes no sense. Its monotony at the highest level.
However, i still feel like they need to include some UNIVERSAL love in this next patch. If that requires pulling everyone they humanly can in CCP into EVE to get it done, then that is what they should do. If they would fix the alliance/corp UI, that impacts all of us. If they would fix POS's, that impacts most of us. Whatever they do, pick something that gives all of us something in the winter expansion. Otherwise, I doubt this angst will not go away anytime soon.
Dex was here. 
PS - Whatever they do, don't redistribute between HI/WH and NULL, as has been hinted at. That will only fuel the problem, not fix it.
|

Riggs Droput
Mad Bombers Guns and Alcohol
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 00:10:00 -
[134] - Quote
I think CCP wants to focus on nul sec first due to the fact that they advertise empire building and owning space as one of the key features of EVE. If they keep promoting that feature what good is it if no one plays in nul sec. Yes low sec and FW need fixing but hopefully if they can fix nul sec, you should a ripple effect across all spectrum's of the game, then they can focus on other aspects of the game that need work.
Riggs
|

ISquishWorms
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 00:18:00 -
[135] - Quote
All I want to know is if they are going to put in some time to fix the bugs. It is the bugs that annoy me most while playing Eve.
New content would be great too though.
Waiting in anticipation...
Mara Rinn wrote:Vicar2008 wrote:No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said. At least they are telling us that stuff is happening. I find it irritating when stuff happens and we hear nothing from CCP or CSM. Hopefully we'll see more messaging from CSM and CCP in the future. Where messaging basically means "telegraphing our activities" without necessarily "narrating our activities". People who engage in hand-to-hand combat such as boxing, Karate or Tae Kwon Do will understand the difference between "telegraphing" and "narrating". It's the same principle as using your indicators when driving a car: you're not actually telling people where you're going, just that you're turning left. So while "we're having a meeting" might not mean much in the grand scheme of things, it is a start.
Totally agree Mara. |

Nin Kimrov
Kenzi Arms and Munitions
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 00:19:00 -
[136] - Quote
They will need to act fast, because time is running out... |

Jon Taggart
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 00:24:00 -
[137] - Quote
I'd like to see more Walking in Stations content. The potential is astronomical. |

KaarBaak
16
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 00:33:00 -
[138] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Vicar2008 wrote:No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said. At least they are telling us that stuff is happening. I find it irritating when stuff happens and we hear nothing from CCP or CSM. Hopefully we'll see more messaging from CSM and CCP in the future. Where messaging basically means "telegraphing our activities" without necessarily "narrating our activities". People who engage in hand-to-hand combat such as boxing, Karate or Tae Kwon Do will understand the difference between "telegraphing" and "narrating". It's the same principle as using your indicators when driving a car: you're not actually telling people where you're going, just that you're turning left. So while "we're having a meeting" might not mean much in the grand scheme of things, it is a start.
Yes...they are telling you they are having meetings. They could tell you they are having ice cream sandwiches on the moon, too. And you have to believe them because...hey...NDA. But I'm sure CCP will vouch for their honesty. 
CSM trolls forum-dwellers. 6/10 |

MailDeadDrop
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 01:02:00 -
[139] - Quote
So far we have Meissa, Mittani, Two Step, and a few other CSM delegates (sorry -- can't be bothered to gather all the names) claiming to have had a meeting with one CCP manager, and claiming that good stuff was talked about, and claiming that we'll hear about it, eventually, maybe. 138 posts and 7+ hours later, and not a single CCP person has chimed to confirm even the most basic of facts; like even the meeting occurred, much less that anything substantial was discussed or that anything will be the result of it or even the vaguest of indications when. I predict that none will be forthcoming in the next several days either, seeing as CCP is incapable of staffing for the weekend.
Face it CSM: CCP has absolutely no respect for you, and by extension no respect for the players. They're just trolling you. Quelle surprise
MDD |

P42ALPHA
Three 6 MaFiA KRYSIS.
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 01:08:00 -
[140] - Quote
Free trip to Iceland again!!!
Look forward to the Minutes on this we will get in 5-6 months? lol
Meh, we will see if they get this sorted, but I fear CCP has learned if they just wait it out. There will be 3 months of quiet, and 2 weeks of the uproars. |
|

Trainwreck McGee
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 01:29:00 -
[141] - Quote
CSM does not represent me and I will never vote as i think its ******* stupid.
All i know is that CSM goon guy **** face or whatever his name is wants to destroy my C2 WH so i hate him
what thread am i in?
Waffles? |

Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
53
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 01:36:00 -
[142] - Quote
Luckytania wrote:CSM, please don't forget bug stomping as something on the priority list. Closer to the top than the bottom. (Seleene, you'll get my vote if you run again on the "Iterations" platform.)
The paper cuts this week have been getting pretty deep.
e.g., - my drones still don't work consistently correctly (the little bastards) - last night, I couldn't even consistently get Projectile ammo type loaded/switched - my cargo hold window behavior is less satisfying than it was a week ago - I've now gotten into the habit of constantly checking that all my modules are still online - windows won't consistently dismiss when the close control is clicked
Yes, there are work arounds to all these. The point is that I'm now spending a significant amount of game time hitting 'paper cut' bumps and doing the work around rather than straight line playing. It breaks the game-play flow and creates frustration.
Just some irritations from the last couple of days. The full list is immense.
Insofar as the 'Iterations' platform goes, I can say with full confidence that the whole CSM (with regard to any changed to FiS) is pushing for fixing what we have before introducing anything new. It's the first question asked at every opportunity. It's my personal 'crusade' if you will to at the very least see things like the sov system, wormholes, factional warfare and low sec get some serious love. It's what pushed me to write the Reality Check blog a couple days ago. It's obvious stuff, yes, but CCP makes it easy to ***** about.  Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. |

Salpun
Paramount Commerce Masters of Flying Objects
26
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 01:44:00 -
[143] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote:So far we have Meissa, Mittani, Two Step, and a few other CSM delegates (sorry -- can't be bothered to gather all the names) claiming to have had a meeting with one CCP manager, and claiming that good stuff was talked about, and claiming that we'll hear about it, eventually, maybe. 138 posts and 7+ hours later, and not a single CCP person has chimed to confirm even the most basic of facts; like even the meeting occurred, much less that anything substantial was discussed or that anything will be the result of it or even the vaguest of indications when. I predict that none will be forthcoming in the next several days either, seeing as CCP is incapable of staffing for the weekend.
Face it CSM: CCP has absolutely no respect for you, and by extension no respect for the players. They're just trolling you. Quelle surprise
MDD
While I agree with you maybe he is busy writing a devblog so it can be published this weekend As CCP has a one DevBlog a day policy we might see some more devblogs over the weekend that might answer some of the pressing questions
And Seleene please ask about the Dev answers every question. The tread has not been added to the new forums and we need a update |

Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
53
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 01:53:00 -
[144] - Quote
Salpun wrote:While I agree with you maybe he is busy writing a devblog so it can be published this weekend  As CCP has a one DevBlog a day policy we might see some more devblogs over the weekend that might answer some of the pressing questions
I don't think that's going to happen seeing as how Zulu is planning to speak with the CSM again next week. It seems that CCP has learned a lesson or two about running things by the CSM before ummm... 'surprising' the community with news. 
Salpun wrote:And Seleene please ask about the Dev answers every question. The tread has not been added to the new forums and we need a update 
Good point and I'll poke someone about getting that going again.
I also wrote a quick blog about the events of today to try and put everything in one place: Minutes & Meetings Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. |

Demon Azrakel
Defiant.. Narwhals Ate My Duck
16
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 02:03:00 -
[145] - Quote
Having just read your blog Seleene, those Dominion features that never happened sound pretty cool... had they occurred, I may have never left nullsec.
CCP, iterate on Apocrypha, Dominion, Incursion (cough, there are another 4 pirate factions, I also suggest once they are introduced upping the DPS but making them less omni damage. Also, 1/5 rarity of each compared to now so isk faucet is kept the same...). I have a feeling you will iterate on Incarna even if I would rather see the whole thing rolled back. |

Salpun
Paramount Commerce Masters of Flying Objects
26
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 02:03:00 -
[146] - Quote
nice update thanks
I was just thinking the CQ devs might have one over the weekend becouse there is another TQ candidate on Sisi.
|

Gregor Palter
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 02:19:00 -
[147] - Quote
Let me point out that while I'm as bitter and cynical as can be, I do applaud and respect the effort the CSM (and previous CSMs, lets not forget that) put in. Right now I have zero reasons to trust CCP (as a company) on it's word and until that trust is somewhat restored I'll stay bitter and voice my opinion here and elsewhere.
Per Hilmar's famous mail; actions, not words. Excuses are the refuge of the weak. |

Hotaru Yamato
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 02:51:00 -
[148] - Quote
I trust the CSM will represent the eve players' views to the best to their ability. |

Kengutsi Akira
GloboTech Industries
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 02:54:00 -
[149] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote:like even the meeting occurred
I think it occurred, and threats of legal action / bannings were liberally handed out and they were told to me good little lapdogs again or **** would get real an the one ex lawyer would get to meet the CCP legal team
oh yeah what kind of lawyer is he I wanted to ask that the first time I heard he was one. Cause if he's anything other than international/icelandic corporate law, Im pretty sure he's in over his head here
Hotaru Yamato wrote:I trust the CSM will represent the eve players' views to the best to their ability.
epic troll |

AnzacPaul
Perkone Caldari State
77
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 03:10:00 -
[150] - Quote
Seleene wrote:I also wrote a quick blog about the events of today to try and put everything in one place: Minutes & Meetings
Always liked your blogs Seleene, I think having been on both sides of the fence gives you no reason to favour one side or the other, to a certain extent 
Unfortunately like everything lately, it's all just a bit more of a SoonGäó thing then anything. |
|

Krutoj
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
32
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 04:20:00 -
[151] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote: Face it CSM: CCP has absolutely no respect for you, and by extension no respect for the players. They're just trolling you. Quelle surprise
MDD
I faced it ages ago, you cant give respect unless you given some in return. Am yet to see CSM given some respect by CCP in terms of our ideas heard and considered, rather than just heard and ignored. And am not talking about small ideas they approved, am talking 0.0 change over, POS, ship re-balancing and other big issues.
Krutoj D checking in |

Cearain
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
31
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 04:26:00 -
[152] - Quote
KaarBaak wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:Vicar2008 wrote:No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said. At least they are telling us that stuff is happening. I find it irritating when stuff happens and we hear nothing from CCP or CSM. Hopefully we'll see more messaging from CSM and CCP in the future. Where messaging basically means "telegraphing our activities" without necessarily "narrating our activities". People who engage in hand-to-hand combat such as boxing, Karate or Tae Kwon Do will understand the difference between "telegraphing" and "narrating". It's the same principle as using your indicators when driving a car: you're not actually telling people where you're going, just that you're turning left. So while "we're having a meeting" might not mean much in the grand scheme of things, it is a start. Yes...they are telling you they are having meetings. They could tell you they are having ice cream sandwiches on the moon, too. And you have to believe them because...hey...NDA. But I'm sure CCP will vouch for their honesty.  CSM trolls forum-dwellers. 6/10
Well the nice part here is we are actually dealing with numbers. How many devs are currently assigned to real eve? How many will be assigned when? These are the questions that need answers.
If CSM comes back with anything other than these numbers this is a waste.
Because if they come back saying "Yay CCP will fix problem X in real eve" and its not clear they are fixing it with new developers, then chances are, they just pulled developers from problem Y in real eve. In other words overall nothing will really change for eve.
That is why this needs to focus on *how many developers* and not specific issues. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1329906
|

RougeOperator
Autocannons Anonymous
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 04:29:00 -
[153] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:RougeOperator wrote:I find that fact the minutes were put out and most people still don't know about them is just more of CCPs now famously bad communication skills.
I mean come on guys get it together. Your a world wide company. Try to act like it. Stop making the CSM do your work and take the brunt of your mistakes. I have my issues with the CSM and how it works and how people get elected. But im more sickened by they fact CCP is clearly putting them out in front of the mob so unfairly on so many issues.
Though i can say some CSM members are just tossing gas on the fire half the time. How did they fail in communicating this? It is at the top of the Dev Blog list, (the same one where you would go on the eve website where they always are). They prominently posted about it on their wall on facebook. CCP staff tweeted its arrival. CSM tweeted its arrival. I'm sure the next time they send out a newsletter, it will be mentioned there too. People are simply being ******** and raging about things without checking their facts first. Rouge, stop hanging around all this depressing forum chatter and come fly with your corpmates again, we've missed you! I thought you had unsubbed and MIA until I saw your posting. If you have an account active (i'm assuming you do since you're posting), come fly with us :-) We're having just as much fun as we always have had....whether CCP or CSM has anything to say about it one way or another.
They need to do and eve mail bulletin since their own metrics show most of the players do not go to the forums. Maybe you could call it tactical PR unawareness on their part. But I would expect this type of info and patch notes would be in some official CCP newsletter put in the players EvEmail boxes. Many times you have to know exactly what it is you are looking for to find the info you want. I do find the dev blog to be a cluster F%$# in many ways. Thats my opinion on that.
I mean the frickenn spammed us to spend IRL money in the next store after all. They only reason they dont is they want to keep the player base at large unaware on purpose. They set it up on a dev blog post is cute and all but that is just so they can say they try to inform players at the bear minimum.
The way the currently get most things done is not sufficient. |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 05:36:00 -
[154] - Quote
RougeOperator wrote: They need to do and eve mail bulletin since their own metrics show most of the players do not go to the forums. Maybe you could call it tactical PR unawareness on their part. But I would expect this type of info and patch notes would be in some official CCP newsletter put in the players EvEmail boxes. Many times you have to know exactly what it is you are looking for to find the info you want. I do find the dev blog to be a cluster F%$# in many ways. Thats my opinion on that.
I mean the frickenn spammed us to spend IRL money in the next store after all. They only reason they dont is they want to keep the player base at large unaware on purpose. They set it up on a dev blog post is cute and all but that is just so they can say they try to inform players at the bear minimum.
I dunno....an Evemail about a dev blog about minutes from a meeting, which was about a leaked bulletin, which was about content, seems to be a stretch. I think if most players don't care enough to read forums or peruse the website from time to time, they will most certainly be annoyed with information about information about information being dropped into their evemails.
I much prefer that Evemail be kept for In-game purposes only. I send a lot of mail that has to do with "important stuff" - which for me means diplomatic issues, corporate bulletins, marching orders, announcing campaigns, events, etc, and when I send a mail I expect my corpmates or friends to take a moment and read it. The minute that our Evemail begins to fill with out-of-game junk (which I would say an announcement about a devblog about minutes from 2 month old meeting qualifies as) than people will stop reading it and gameplay would be hampered.
Not promoting is not the same as hiding, so I hardly think you can say CCP is being deceptive. And let's face it - the playerbase is just too smart to be fooled anyways. This is the heart of this whole conflict - CCP has been repeatedly using run-of-the-mill everyday corporate business practices to navigate PR, spin, damage control, etc, and while it may work on everyday consumer masses, Eve players are the type who will crank out spreadsheets, flowcharts, and the like FOR FUN. Sifting through information and calling bullshit is something the players and the CSM have done a great job of, so I really don't think there's a lot more to the picture than we have already pieced together. It's all here for the grabbing.
In the end though, the fact that subscriber numbers have merely leveled off, instead of plummeting, is evidence that a great number of players simply take Eve at face value, log in everyday, blow **** up, and have fun without complaining, blissfully unaware that Eve "is on the brink of disaster". And as long as they keep it up, Eve won't be.
I, too, would love to see some of the much needed fixes and long overdue promises made good. I hate seeing CCP continuously promote stuff, than fail to deliver. It's almost pitiful. Winter brings with it a chance to turn that around, so in the meantime I'm just trying to enjoy what is there to enjoy.
At least now, unlike the past few expansions it seems that the Emperor has finally more or less admitted that he doesn't have any clothes, and there's every incentive for him to get his tailor in gear or to get a new tailor.......cause winter means cold. And no one wants to see a shriveled pair. |

Puppet Mas'ter
Umbra Exitium Order Of The Unforgiving
19
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 05:38:00 -
[155] - Quote
Cearain wrote:
Well the nice part here is we are actually dealing with numbers. How many devs are currently assigned to real eve? How many will be assigned when? These are the questions that need answers.
If CSM comes back with anything other than these numbers this is a waste.
I really think they will slam headlong into the NDA here. CCP: Madness!!! This is FiS Us: Fis? *chuckle* (Gò»-¦Gûí-¦n+ëGò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+ Us: THIS IS EVE |

El'Niaga
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
40
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 05:39:00 -
[156] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Vicar2008 wrote:No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said. Check out the last Dev blogs, plenty of words, no real Comming up content with changes/number crunching etc. It's not a bone being thrown. Meetings like this one, when they reach their conclusion, take the form of a devblog and CSM posts. I believed it important for you to know that discussion is underway to address the problems, even if I can't disclose in what way yet.
Honestly folks waited months to get the emergency minutes, which you claim are unmodified in a post, but I mean if it was an unmodified minutes of the meetings why does it take months. No one believes they are unmodified, just so you know.
|

RougeOperator
Autocannons Anonymous
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 05:59:00 -
[157] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
I dunno....an Evemail about a dev blog about minutes from a meeting, which was about a leaked bulletin, which was about content, seems to be a stretch. I think if most players don't care enough to read forums or peruse the website from time to time, they will most certainly be annoyed with information about information about information being dropped into their evemails.
I much prefer that Evemail be kept for In-game purposes only. I send a lot of mail that has to do with "important stuff" - which for me means diplomatic issues, corporate bulletins, marching orders, announcing campaigns, events, etc, and when I send a mail I expect my corpmates or friends to take a moment and read it. The minute that our Evemail begins to fill with out-of-game junk (which I would say an announcement about a devblog about minutes from 2 month old meeting qualifies as) than people will stop reading it and gameplay would be hampered.
Not promoting is not the same as hiding, so I hardly think you can say CCP is being deceptive. And let's face it - the playerbase is just too smart to be fooled anyways. This is the heart of this whole conflict - CCP has been repeatedly using run-of-the-mill everyday corporate business practices to navigate PR, spin, damage control, etc, and while it may work on everyday consumer masses, Eve players are the type who will crank out spreadsheets, flowcharts, and the like FOR FUN. Sifting through information and calling bullshit is something the players and the CSM have done a great job of, so I really don't think there's a lot more to the picture than we have already pieced together. It's all here for the grabbing.
In the end though, the fact that subscriber numbers have merely leveled off, instead of plummeting, is evidence that a great number of players simply take Eve at face value, log in everyday, blow **** up, and have fun without complaining, blissfully unaware that Eve "is on the brink of disaster". And as long as they keep it up, Eve won't be.
I, too, would love to see some of the much needed fixes and long overdue promises made good. I hate seeing CCP continuously promote stuff, than fail to deliver. It's almost pitiful. Winter brings with it a chance to turn that around, so in the meantime I'm just trying to enjoy what is there to enjoy.
At least now, unlike the past few expansions it seems that the Emperor has finally more or less admitted that he doesn't have any clothes, and there's every incentive for him to get his tailor in gear or to get a new tailor.......cause winter means cold. And no one wants to see a shriveled pair.
We both know they could have a separate box tab for Game related bulletins that would not get in the way of anything that you could turn the blink off for. Wouldn't break in game anything. CCP breaks in game fluff feel more then anyone else honestly.
Also how many of those players that joined are new players that will burn out in a few months. Or like me that still count as subbed until the time runs out on the account? Im willing to make a guess that the leveled off numbers are not going to last and will trend down after a while. Or drop more if CCP does something inflammatory again.
|

kenxi
Wormhole Router's
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 06:30:00 -
[158] - Quote
So this NDA you all signed whats the penalty for breaking it?
Lets say you all csm payoff one of the csm that's sick of being there to break the good news to us all!
Someone should take one for the team unless it means large fines and lawsuits from ccp
Or god forbid the bad news we all know is coming |

Acac Sunflyier
Crimson Infamy Fuzzy Nut Attack Squirrels
14
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 06:33:00 -
[159] - Quote
So basically, you flew out to meet with Zulu, talked about something people wil never hear about, and then came and told us what it is. What if al you did was discuss the nature of clouds?? How would we know? |

Puppet Mas'ter
Umbra Exitium Order Of The Unforgiving
19
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 06:39:00 -
[160] - Quote
Acac Sunflyier wrote:So basically, you flew out to meet with Zulu, talked about something people wil never hear about, and then came and told us what it is. What if al you did was discuss the nature of clouds?? How would we know?
you know, its funny, usually when one enters into a NDA, its forbidden to refer to the NDA in any public forum. How do I know this? "I am in the SWTOR Beta test" "There IS a SWTOR beta test" legalities upheld. CCP: Madness!!! This is FiS Us: Fis? *chuckle* (Gò»-¦Gûí-¦n+ëGò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+ Us: THIS IS EVE |
|

Pak Narhoo
Knights of Kador
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 06:42:00 -
[161] - Quote
kenxi wrote:So this NDA you all signed whats the penalty for breaking it?
Looks nice on your resume you think not? Especially since their real names are attached to their CSM characters. Sure think their future bosses don't know how to google (dig up the name Ankhesentapemkah) ey?
Lol at the forums cannot even put a google link here, lmao
|

cyllan anassan
DEUS EX 1
8
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 06:46:00 -
[162] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Vicar2008 wrote:No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said. Check out the last Dev blogs, plenty of words, no real Comming up content with changes/number crunching etc. It's not a bone being thrown. Meetings like this one, when they reach their conclusion, take the form of a devblog and CSM posts. I believed it important for you to know that discussion is underway to address the problems, even if I can't disclose in what way yet.
i never met a company that cant talk about improvements in their product.
if anything when a company is improving the product they broadcast it to the seven winds.
NDA? what is CCP doing,
patenting a new lifeform?
what a load of BS |

Dusty Warrior
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 06:55:00 -
[163] - Quote
I was going to make a really long and wordy post. Drank another beer and thought better of it.
I've said some dumb stuff on the forums. I apologize for some, not all.
Everything I want for EVE has already been posted by hundreds of other concerned players.
So... guess I'll quote: "These are moments where we look at what our players do and less of what they say".
I suppose I'll do somewhat the same. Guess it's a waiting game for now.
Good luck everyone, let us hope that CCP will anew their relationship with EVE and give her the loving she so deserves.
Keeping in line with the OP
Posting that you had a meeting with CCP but the content of that meeting won't be disclosed because of the NDA is like... I don't know. Holding a three scoop ice cream cone just far enough from a fat kid that he can't reach it.
Cruel |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
130
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 07:01:00 -
[164] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:MailDeadDrop wrote:like even the meeting occurred I think it occurred, and threats of legal action / bannings were liberally handed out and they were told to me good little lapdogs again or **** would get real an the one ex lawyer would get to meet the CCP legal team oh yeah what kind of lawyer is he I wanted to ask that the first time I heard he was one. Cause if he's anything other than international/icelandic corporate law, Im pretty sure he's in over his head here Hotaru Yamato wrote:I trust the CSM will represent the eve players' views to the best to their ability. epic troll
Thanks for your analysis, O mighty internet lawyer. Can you tell me exactly what law you think the CSMs might be faced with charges under? "A first degree charge of Saying Mean Things That Are Provably True"? So far as I know, none of them live in Iceland, so they'd have to be extradited to face any charges.
As for banning? Yeah that'd work well, real smart tactics. I can tell you've read your Machiavelli. Even apart from the tsunami of horrible PR that would generate, even apart from the massive shitstorm that would immediately occur within the playerbase, what do you think the reaction of the banned CSMs might be? Might there be some retaliation that they could take, do you think?
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal made on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. |

Flynn Fetladral
Royal Order of Security Specialists
441
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 07:31:00 -
[165] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Temulkar Blaine wrote:I bow to your superiority mittens!
and the rest of the point i mentioned?
The rest, frankly, I agree with. There is no 'red meat' from the CSM yet because the expansions we've got our handprints all over come in Winter. So there's not much utility we can demonstrate to the playerbase yet in terms of raw gameplay changes, because the Incarna stuff was already in development/heavy production before we took office, and is still sort of looming over us like a bad hangover. Sure, there's devblogs about TiDi and commitments from CCP about 'no gold ammo', but codewise all we've got thus far is the removal of the ship change session timer. If things are implemented as planned at the moment, by the CSM7 election no one sensible will doubt the power or scope of the CSM. However, right now, before the next expansion, it's just pretty words.
'Now witness the full POWER of this fully operational CSM6' |

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 07:37:00 -
[166] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote: We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6
It is going to be hard to remain tuned to something which we can't access.
"Keep listening, but I'm saying nothing" |

cyllan anassan
DEUS EX 1
8
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 07:42:00 -
[167] - Quote
Dex Ironmind wrote:The Mittani wrote:Dead Horse is one of those proposals that cuts across every corner of EVE, because everyone who has ever had to deal with one knows that POSes are utterly miserable. That is the stuff I would like to see the CSM push for in EXPANSIONS - stuff "that cuts across every corner of EVE." The rebalancing/nerfing/patching/fixing issues need to be reserved for in-between expansion actions. I would really like to see the CSM press for some immediate patching/balancing implementations, freeing up the winter expansion for something that benefits all of EVE and does not mainly focus on NULL. Frankly, all of the sandbox is hungry for new toys to play with in the sandbox!!! Don't let the winter expansion be just you about the NULL boys and girls. If null requires an entire expansion, as does low, let it come later. This next expansion needs to be a broad reaching expansion to score some points with their entire player base. Dex was here. 
"The rebalancing/nerfing/patching/fixing issues need to be reserved for in-between expansion actions. "
on the last 2 years that has been the expansions........., plus PI (click-click-click, and repeat) |

T'Laar Bok
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 07:44:00 -
[168] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Stay tuned...
Soooo......... another 3 months?
Amphetimines are your friend. |

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
100
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 07:48:00 -
[169] - Quote
Flynn Fetladral wrote:The Mittani wrote:Temulkar Blaine wrote:I bow to your superiority mittens!
and the rest of the point i mentioned?
The rest, frankly, I agree with. There is no 'red meat' from the CSM yet because the expansions we've got our handprints all over come in Winter. So there's not much utility we can demonstrate to the playerbase yet in terms of raw gameplay changes, because the Incarna stuff was already in development/heavy production before we took office, and is still sort of looming over us like a bad hangover. Sure, there's devblogs about TiDi and commitments from CCP about 'no gold ammo', but codewise all we've got thus far is the removal of the ship change session timer. If things are implemented as planned at the moment, by the CSM7 election no one sensible will doubt the power or scope of the CSM. However, right now, before the next expansion, it's just pretty words. 'Now witness the full POWER of this fully operational CSM6'
haha that's how it read to me too. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Sane Industries Inc.
80
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 07:49:00 -
[170] - Quote
Flynn Fetladral wrote:'Now witness the full POWER of this fully operational CSM6'
"These aren't the Devs you're looking for..."
Seriously, you gave me my first chuckle of the day, thanks! CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM bl... |
|

Alpheias
58
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 08:44:00 -
[171] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:
If things are implemented as planned at the moment, by the CSM7 election no one sensible will doubt the power or scope of the CSM. However, right now, before the next expansion, it's just pretty words.
Eh. It boils down to the individuals elected too, do they dare to confront CCP and would they dedicate themselves to bitchslap CCP when CCP isn't staying in the kitchen or are they just in for the free trips to Iceland?
GÖ½ When your ship gets blown to bits GÖ½ And you lose your Faction fits \Gÿ+/ Don't worry GÖ¬ GÖ½ GÖ¬ GÖ½ GÖ½ GÖ¬ GÖ½ GÖ¬ Be Happy \Gÿ+/ |

Azelor Delaria
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming The 0rphanage
12
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 10:01:00 -
[172] - Quote
Why is it that everyone always hides behind the "NDA, can't discuss" excuse?
These are lame attempts at PR and damage control by CCP. There is nothing else to say about it. It has been said multiple times that so long as the NDA remains in full effect with regards to this whole debacle, no one is going to believe them. I have given a lot of thought to this, and while I agree that CCP is taking this game in the wrong direction, I can't help but feel that this entire charade by the CSM is a troll.
We know Mittens is a lawyer. If he was as good a lawyer as he was a shitpoaster, he would have found legal loopholes in the NDA, because no one is going to realize everything. There will always be at least one loophole. And if Mittens doesn't have a copy of it, then he is arguably the worst lawyer I think I've heard of in quite some time. I bet I could find loopholes, provided a copy of the NDA, and I'm not even a law student! My intent is to be a criminal defense attorney specializing in Constitutional issues, not a contract attorney!
Every time I see one of the CSM put out a new thread saying, "Hey, we've talked to CCP about this stuff!", it's all a pathetic attempt to try to win votes with the upcoming CSM elections. They are all vague threads created to appease a small portion of the populace who are too stupid to realize what's going on. Yes, I mean that. And I'm looking at Goons mainly, as well as every null-sec bloc blindly supporting their little body politic.
There has been nothing to hint at anything we care about being brought up to the devs. There are no specifics, there are no bulletpoints. There is nothing. We already know the CSM is a sham and a joke. CCP doesn't care, you don't care.
Why should we?
You want to prove you're on our side, then tell CCP to f*** off on the NDA just once. If the entire CSM says, "You know what? The NDA is good, but transparency was promised, and you owe the players that much", what is CCP going to do? Fire you all? You don't work for them. Are they going to kick you off the CSM? If you truly want to help, then let your balls drop - all of you and put your money where your mouth is. All we see if pussyfooting around the subjects with vague insinuations and non-specific threads. It gets old. |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum
55
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 10:17:00 -
[173] - Quote
I will return in 3 months to read it when the report has been censored and delayed before finally be released, when its not even important anymore. It seems to be the SOP when it comes to these types of things. Also these meeting seems extremely useless from a players standpoint since anything useful is blocked by the NDA. I mean I understand why they have it and why the CSM follow it, but at times there has to be a little give when it comes to releasing information regarding possible updates/content. |

J Kunjeh
55
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 10:30:00 -
[174] - Quote
Azelor Delaria wrote: You want to prove you're on our side, then tell CCP to f*** off on the NDA just once. If the entire CSM says, "You know what? The NDA is good, but transparency was promised, and you owe the players that much", what is CCP going to do? Fire you all? You don't work for them. Are they going to kick you off the CSM? If you truly want to help, then let your balls drop - all of you and put your money where your mouth is. All we see if pussyfooting around the subjects with vague insinuations and non-specific threads. It gets old.
You're totally clueless about the real world, obviously, so I'll help you out: NDA's have LEGAL standing and those who break them can be sued in court. So yeah, NONE of them are likely to break NDA and for damn good reason.
Fool...
"The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5)-á |

Blue Harrier
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 10:42:00 -
[175] - Quote
Why in heck does a GAME need a frigging NDA anyway, itGÇÖs not like they have any competition or they are developing a new bomb, drug, or something?
Are CCP worried WOW will copy what they do, will some new kid on the block nick all their ideas, or are they more worried if the real news got out so many subscribers would drop their subscription the game would go bust overnight.
I get the feeling the upper echelons of CCP are so wound up in GÇÿtheirGÇÖ idea of what the game GÇÿshouldGÇÖ be they have no real idea of what the game actually GÇÿisGÇÖ.
WIS as it has been implemented so far is the dumbest, dumb upgrade this game has had forced on it since I have been playing. Will the winter expansion save it, unlikely unless CCP go back to its roots and really put FIS back on the map?
|

Louis deGuerre
Malevolence. Territorial Claim Unit
16
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 10:46:00 -
[176] - Quote
Dear CSM,
If you have nothing to say then don't say anything.
I like you guys so not reported for spam/trolling. 
*Hugs* FIRE FRIENDSHIP TORPEDOES ! |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 10:55:00 -
[177] - Quote
THIS game needs an NDA because of the competitive nature of it. IE if I knew they were definitely going to remove ice from high sec tomorrow, guess what i'd be buying today?
Honestly Im going to reserve my judgement for when the next expansion comes out, and thats really all everyone should do. Trust when the CSM says stuff is happening and see what comes out of it.
Really what else are you going to do? get pissed off because you think theyre lieing to you? What The Mittani said is right, we havent seen any major content since these talks began so we have no basis for saying whether or not CCP is actually implementing any of these things. |

Azelor Delaria
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming The 0rphanage
12
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 10:57:00 -
[178] - Quote
J Kunjeh wrote:Azelor Delaria wrote: You want to prove you're on our side, then tell CCP to f*** off on the NDA just once. If the entire CSM says, "You know what? The NDA is good, but transparency was promised, and you owe the players that much", what is CCP going to do? Fire you all? You don't work for them. Are they going to kick you off the CSM? If you truly want to help, then let your balls drop - all of you and put your money where your mouth is. All we see if pussyfooting around the subjects with vague insinuations and non-specific threads. It gets old.
You're totally clueless about the real world, obviously, so I'll help you out: NDA's have LEGAL standing and those who break them can be sued in court. So yeah, NONE of them are likely to break NDA and for damn good reason. Fool...
Non-Disclosure Agreements have legal standing if, and only if, the information obtained and disseminated produces actual harm. In essence, unless trade secrets are leaked, the NDA isn't violated. A CSM coming out and saying, "Look, we talked about X with CCP, Zulu agrees, he's bringing it to the bosses" isn't a violation of trade secrets. At least I hope it isn't.
I mean, is making the game better to keep subscriptions a trade secret, now...?
|

Fluffy Muff
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 11:05:00 -
[179] - Quote
So... is it 18 months yet?
I'm sure the results of these meetings will be lots of blah blah blah from CCP as always (Dev blogs, bad posts, etc).
If you're bored with FiS atm (I am), the best option is just to un-sub, and then re-sub IF and WHEN CCP decide to actually implement half of the stuff they will babble on about. My accounts will lapse soon, and I plan to do just this. |

Janos Saal
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 11:11:00 -
[180] - Quote
Fluffy Muff wrote:So... is it 18 months yet?
No, you see the "18 months" is like the speed of light. It remains constant no matter how much time has passed. So ten. 50, 100 years from now it'll still be 18 months away. EVE is dead |
|

Vicar2008
Royal Black Watch Highlanders Warped Aggression
16
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 11:12:00 -
[181] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Salpun wrote:While I agree with you maybe he is busy writing a devblog so it can be published this weekend  As CCP has a one DevBlog a day policy we might see some more devblogs over the weekend that might answer some of the pressing questions I don't think that's going to happen seeing as how Zulu is planning to speak with the CSM again next week. It seems that CCP has learned a lesson or two about running things by the CSM before ummm... 'surprising' the community with news.  Salpun wrote:And Seleene please ask about the Dev answers every question. The tread has not been added to the new forums and we need a update  Good point and I'll poke someone about getting that going again. I also wrote a quick blog about the events of today to try and put everything in one place: Minutes & Meetings
Thanks for the link to your blog Seleene, that actually made me more confident about actual stuff happening behind the scenes. Hopefully good news can be conveyed to us very soon in the form of a blog from CCP with actual gameplay content. |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
62
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 11:13:00 -
[182] - Quote
I am just surprised it took this long to implement SM3.
SM3 came out in 2004, and people are butthurt that they can't play Eve on their PC anymore?
Do yourself a favour, go out and buy a nice decent graphics card. Turn Eve settings up to max and enjoy. |

Caius Sivaris
Dark Nexxus S I L E N T.
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 11:16:00 -
[183] - Quote
This is one of the moments where we look at what CCP does and less of what CCP says.
|
|

CCP Manifest
C C P C C P Alliance
34

|
Posted - 2011.09.10 12:26:00 -
[184] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote:So far we have Meissa, Mittani, Two Step, and a few other CSM delegates (sorry -- can't be bothered to gather all the names) claiming to have had a meeting with one CCP manager, and claiming that good stuff was talked about, and claiming that we'll hear about it, eventually, maybe. 138 posts and 7+ hours later, and not a single CCP person has chimed to confirm even the most basic of facts; like even the meeting occurred, much less that anything substantial was discussed or that anything will be the result of it or even the vaguest of indications when. I predict that none will be forthcoming in the next several days either, seeing as CCP is incapable of staffing for the weekend.
Face it CSM: CCP has absolutely no respect for you, and by extension no respect for the players. They're just trolling you. Quelle surprise
MDD
This is a very fair point. Thanks for bringing it up.
I'd been talking to the CSM about something entirely unrelated a day or two before, but since I already knew what the content of yesterday's dialogue was going to be, I requested to be a part of the meeting as a fly on the wall. CCP Xhagen graciously accepted my request.
Obviously, since I am also under NDA as an employee (and since I'm part of the evil team of the one single guy in public relations that pursues press opportunities) I too cannot reveal the main bulk of the conversation. Sorry dads I am disappoint.
However, for what it's worth, as an EVE player I can say that I am wet-my-pants-silly-happy about where the meeting content is headed. Yes, this was a preliminary meeting, but it was absolutely positively necessarily so. That does put the CSM temporarily in a bit of a tough spot, but eh, they were elected to be in that tough spot and kinda campaigned to be there.
I'll get it out of the way here. This meeting was not about ponies. Sorry guys.
One of my main takeaways from the meeting (and my dealings with them separate from the meeting) is that the CSM will not be distracted from their stated mission. Their tactical use of a mini-PR campaign is a testament to that. Their immediate first responses to stuff Zulu had to say also speaks volumes to their undeterrability. They haven't "called a truce" or been sated.. yet. See Mittani's Red Meat comments in this thread. Their questions were myriad and delivered stalwartly. Also, they haven't been threatened with the NDA wagged in front of their faces. They have stood quite firm in their priorities--and are very much of the mind of many of you that it's going to be "watch what we do" .
They are right in saying that nothing of detailed substance was said during the meeting--however there was apparently enough vague substance to convince them that the next meeting should be promising indeed. Convinced enough to decide to come to you guys and give a progress report, treading dangeous political waters. If the preliminary meeting didn't smell of enough Red Meat, I severely doubt they would be here at all. We didn't try to convince them to speak to you guys.
Hope that addresses some of the meta-comments here about the CSM's behavior/communications. Sorry about the delay in coming here. I had to sleep.
|
|

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
62
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 12:44:00 -
[185] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:MailDeadDrop wrote:So far we have Meissa, Mittani, Two Step, and a few other CSM delegates (sorry -- can't be bothered to gather all the names) claiming to have had a meeting with one CCP manager, and claiming that good stuff was talked about, and claiming that we'll hear about it, eventually, maybe. 138 posts and 7+ hours later, and not a single CCP person has chimed to confirm even the most basic of facts; like even the meeting occurred, much less that anything substantial was discussed or that anything will be the result of it or even the vaguest of indications when. I predict that none will be forthcoming in the next several days either, seeing as CCP is incapable of staffing for the weekend.
Face it CSM: CCP has absolutely no respect for you, and by extension no respect for the players. They're just trolling you. Quelle surprise
MDD This is a very fair point. Thanks for bringing it up. I'd been talking to the CSM about something entirely unrelated a day or two before, but since I already knew what the content of yesterday's dialogue was going to be, I requested to be a part of the meeting as a fly on the wall. CCP Xhagen graciously accepted my request. Obviously, since I am also under NDA as an employee (and since I'm part of the evil team of the one single guy in public relations that pursues press opportunities) I too cannot reveal the main bulk of the conversation. Sorry dads I am disappoint. However, for what it's worth, as an EVE player I can say that I am wet-my-pants-silly-happy about where the meeting content is headed. Yes, this was a preliminary meeting, but it was absolutely positively necessarily so. That does put the CSM temporarily in a bit of a tough spot, but eh, they were elected to be in that tough spot and kinda campaigned to be there. I'll get it out of the way here. This meeting was not about ponies. Sorry guys. One of my main takeaways from the meeting (and my dealings with them separate from the meeting) is that the CSM will not be distracted from their stated mission. Their tactical use of a mini-PR campaign is a testament to that. Their immediate first responses to stuff Zulu had to say also speaks volumes to their undeterrability. They haven't "called a truce" or been sated.. yet. See Mittani's Red Meat comments in this thread. Their questions were myriad and delivered stalwartly. Also, they haven't been threatened with the NDA wagged in front of their faces. They have stood quite firm in their priorities--and are very much of the mind of many of you that it's going to be "watch what we do" . They are right in saying that nothing of detailed substance was said during the meeting--however there was apparently enough vague substance to convince them that the next meeting should be promising indeed. Convinced enough to decide to come to you guys and give a progress report, treading dangeous political waters. If the preliminary meeting didn't smell of enough Red Meat, I severely doubt they would be here at all. We didn't try to convince them to speak to you guys. Hope that addresses some of the meta-comments here about the CSM's behavior/communications. Sorry about the delay in coming here. I had to sleep.
CCP Manifest, if i may be so bold...
tl;dr, CCP is a business. And as far as businesses go, they number one business goal is to stay in business. That is best done by having great products people are wanting to buy |

Azelor Delaria
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming The 0rphanage
12
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 12:51:00 -
[186] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:MailDeadDrop wrote:So far we have Meissa, Mittani, Two Step, and a few other CSM delegates (sorry -- can't be bothered to gather all the names) claiming to have had a meeting with one CCP manager, and claiming that good stuff was talked about, and claiming that we'll hear about it, eventually, maybe. 138 posts and 7+ hours later, and not a single CCP person has chimed to confirm even the most basic of facts; like even the meeting occurred, much less that anything substantial was discussed or that anything will be the result of it or even the vaguest of indications when. I predict that none will be forthcoming in the next several days either, seeing as CCP is incapable of staffing for the weekend.
Face it CSM: CCP has absolutely no respect for you, and by extension no respect for the players. They're just trolling you. Quelle surprise
MDD This is a very fair point. Thanks for bringing it up. I'd been talking to the CSM about something entirely unrelated a day or two before, but since I already knew what the content of yesterday's dialogue was going to be, I requested to be a part of the meeting as a fly on the wall. CCP Xhagen graciously accepted my request. Obviously, since I am also under NDA as an employee (and since I'm part of the evil team of the one single guy in public relations that pursues press opportunities) I too cannot reveal the main bulk of the conversation. Sorry dads I am disappoint. However, for what it's worth, as an EVE player I can say that I am wet-my-pants-silly-happy about where the meeting content is headed. Yes, this was a preliminary meeting, but it was absolutely positively necessarily so. That does put the CSM temporarily in a bit of a tough spot, but eh, they were elected to be in that tough spot and kinda campaigned to be there. I'll get it out of the way here. This meeting was not about ponies. Sorry guys. One of my main takeaways from the meeting (and my dealings with them separate from the meeting) is that the CSM will not be distracted from their stated mission. Their tactical use of a mini-PR campaign is a testament to that. Their immediate first responses to stuff Zulu had to say also speaks volumes to their undeterrability. They haven't "called a truce" or been sated.. yet. See Mittani's Red Meat comments in this thread. Their questions were myriad and delivered stalwartly. Also, they haven't been threatened with the NDA wagged in front of their faces. They have stood quite firm in their priorities--and are very much of the mind of many of you that it's going to be "watch what we do" . They are right in saying that nothing of detailed substance was said during the meeting--however there was apparently enough vague substance to convince them that the next meeting should be promising indeed. Convinced enough to decide to come to you guys and give a progress report, treading dangeous political waters. If the preliminary meeting didn't smell of enough Red Meat, I severely doubt they would be here at all. We didn't try to convince them to speak to you guys. Hope that addresses some of the meta-comments here about the CSM's behavior/communications. Sorry about the delay in coming here. I had to sleep.
You don't need to convince them. You need to convince us. You can say all you want that nothing of substance was talked about, but whether the NDA is wagged in their face or not isn't the issue. The fact they can't talk about something that had no "substance" because of the NDA speaks for itself.
No one really takes the CSM seriously anymore. They are puppets for you, and only looking out for their own interests. You have to convince us, the majority of the players not privy to any communiques involved. Until then, what you do speaks so loudly that what you say I can not hear. And until we see something substantial, with CCP acting on it, this means little to nothing. |

Caius Sivaris
Dark Nexxus S I L E N T.
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 13:00:00 -
[187] - Quote
Seleene wrote:This meeting was something of a surprise and the content of it was enough to convince me that CCP is taking the concerns of the CSM and the players very seriously. Beyond that I cannot say more.
More like taking the (un)subcription numbers seriously. The accounting department is likely the best ally the players got inside CCP, it wielding most influence than Team BFF will ever have. It also proves that unsubscribing is with bad press by far the best lever players have. Way more efficient that threadnaughts and in game protests will ever be. It gives you time to play other games too, some even made by professional studios for once (DeusEX: HR anyone?)
Go go bean counters! Make them do the right thing.
|

Mr LaForge
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 13:03:00 -
[188] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:
I'll get it out of the way here. This meeting was not about ponies. Sorry guys.
Now I'm REALLY disappointed. |

Reva Dantenov
Reib Autonomous Industries
8
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 13:09:00 -
[189] - Quote
This is the best CSM ever. Every time they do or say anything, dozens of crazies come out of the woodwork. And we get to reap the delicious tears. Ponies ponies ponies ponies. |

Meryl SinGarda
Belligerent Underpayed Tactical Team
99
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 13:09:00 -
[190] - Quote
Caius Sivaris wrote:This is one of the moments where we look at what CCP does and less of what CCP says.
This statement is becoming so old and stale that it has completely lost its meaning. Not that it had any meaning, for me, in the first place. Please come up with something new to say in order to present your bitterness toward CCP.
Fly Safe, Die Hard |
|

Tribunia
Ducks of Death
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 13:22:00 -
[191] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:... we discussed the players' concerns
I would put it to be CCP s concern. Really.
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:...I can't disclose in what way yet.
Are there more ways than one to solve this debacle? |

Jon Taggart
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 13:41:00 -
[192] - Quote
I'd say wait until the Winter expansion hits and see. What else can be said that already hasn't been repeated ad infinitum? Hide the torches for now, but be ready to use them if necessary. |

Nin Kimrov
Kenzi Arms and Munitions
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 13:53:00 -
[193] - Quote
I will say it another time : If CCP can't come with a planned development plan concerning EvE online space content, and if CCP don't respect their own release planning, then the game will suffer like it currently is.
CCP will really need to do another expansion like Apocrypha. Even that, I don't one an expansion, I want them to fix the features that we have in the game, but are not working. Hybrid weapon, faction warfare, POS, low sec dynamic, 0.0 dynamic.
We all know that CCP said they would fix those stuff, one day or another, soon, etc. But I still question myself : the rebalance of the dramiel ship certainly don't take 6 months to do. Please, if it is rebalance stuff, don't make an expansion with it. We also need new stuff. |

Cearain
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
31
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 13:58:00 -
[194] - Quote
Puppet Mas'ter wrote:Cearain wrote:
Well the nice part here is we are actually dealing with numbers. How many devs are currently assigned to real eve? How many will be assigned when? These are the questions that need answers.
If CSM comes back with anything other than these numbers this is a waste.
I really think they will slam headlong into the NDA here.
Well CCP made a dev blog with many of the numbers in july 2010. If they are not willing to tell us now we can figure out the truth.
Again unless we hear they assigning devs to eve only an idiot will think they are developing it. If we do not hear how devs are assigned, then any talk about some fix or balance will just mean they stopped working on some other part of eve. Net gain will still be zero. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1329906
|

Smoking Blunts
18
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 15:31:00 -
[195] - Quote
speaking to a few peeps in corp chat about these meetings and to cut a long story short the underlying feeling was :
patch notes or GTFO CCP-áare full of words and no action. We watch what they do and its nothing but false statements and lies.
|

Gnulpie
Miner Tech
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 15:49:00 -
[196] - Quote
This "we can't say anything, it is NDA" is stupid. Stupid and an insult to the players.
If you can't even say "we are satisfied with the meeting, things are moving now into the right direction" or "we don't know what will happen, at least some people at CCP listened to us" or "this meeting was useless, we feel completely ignored" then you should right away step down from the CSM - this has nothing to do with NDA.
No one expects you to release a detailed report of the meeting. Such report needs times, needs to be checked by CCP etc. No one in their right mind would expect such a report right now.
But you should certainly be able to communicate your feelings about the meeting and your impression. And that is all it needs at the moment. You, the CSM, says that CCP needs to communicate better but you aren't doing better, quite the contrary!
|

Sister Bliss
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 15:52:00 -
[197] - Quote
Two step wrote:E man Industries wrote:Can the CSm meet with higher than Zulu...
I'm sure zulu would agree with much of what the CSM wants...but he can't allocate more budget from WoD to FIS. I'm 99% sure that the only person above Zulu is Hilmar.
If that's the case, then Zulu has a hell of a lot of things to answer for. |

Kengutsi Akira
GloboTech Industries
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 15:58:00 -
[198] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Kengutsi Akira wrote:MailDeadDrop wrote:like even the meeting occurred I think it occurred, and threats of legal action / bannings were liberally handed out and they were told to me good little lapdogs again or **** would get real an the one ex lawyer would get to meet the CCP legal team oh yeah what kind of lawyer is he I wanted to ask that the first time I heard he was one. Cause if he's anything other than international/icelandic corporate law, Im pretty sure he's in over his head here Hotaru Yamato wrote:I trust the CSM will represent the eve players' views to the best to their ability. epic troll Thanks for your analysis, O mighty internet lawyer. Can you tell me exactly what law you think the CSMs might be faced with charges under? "A first degree charge of Saying Mean Things That Are Provably True"? So far as I know, none of them live in Iceland, so they'd have to be extradited to face any charges. As for banning? Yeah that'd work well, real smart tactics. I can tell you've read your Machiavelli. Even apart from the tsunami of horrible PR that would generate, even apart from the massive shitstorm that would immediately occur within the playerbase, what do you think the reaction of the banned CSMs might be? Might there be some retaliation that they could take, do you think?
man you just orgasm by trolling everything I say dont you? lol
ooh there I gave you another one.
I dunno where you come off flaming me for being an internet lawyer when I just asked what mittens' specialty was lol You part of his fan club too now? Watch out for that kool aid man it has a kick |

Kengutsi Akira
GloboTech Industries
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 16:05:00 -
[199] - Quote
Louis deGuerre wrote:Dear CSM, If you have nothing to say then don't say anything. I like you guys so not reported for spam/trolling.  *Hugs*
As Ive noticed it doesnt even matter if you do report them the mods dont touch anything they say, an Ive seen some pretty blatantly troll posts by more than a few of them.
Sigras wrote:THIS game needs an NDA because of the competitive nature of it. IE if I knew they were definitely going to remove ice from high sec tomorrow, guess what i'd be buying today?
Hence why them telling us there would be more transparency was utter bullshit. You cant HAVE more transparency in this game cause the sharks will take it as a sign of weakness and use every bit of info given to their advantage AND THATS NOT A BAD THING
Transparency just doesnt track in a game this cutthroat
Azelor Delaria wrote:J Kunjeh wrote:Azelor Delaria wrote: You want to prove you're on our side, then tell CCP to f*** off on the NDA just once. If the entire CSM says, "You know what? The NDA is good, but transparency was promised, and you owe the players that much", what is CCP going to do? Fire you all? You don't work for them. Are they going to kick you off the CSM? If you truly want to help, then let your balls drop - all of you and put your money where your mouth is. All we see if pussyfooting around the subjects with vague insinuations and non-specific threads. It gets old.
You're totally clueless about the real world, obviously, so I'll help you out: NDA's have LEGAL standing and those who break them can be sued in court. So yeah, NONE of them are likely to break NDA and for damn good reason. Fool... Non-Disclosure Agreements have legal standing if, and only if, the information obtained and disseminated produces actual harm. In essence, unless trade secrets are leaked, the NDA isn't violated. A CSM coming out and saying, "Look, we talked about X with CCP, Zulu agrees, he's bringing it to the bosses" isn't a violation of trade secrets. At least I hope it isn't. I mean, is making the game better to keep subscriptions a trade secret, now...?
lol THIS guy is the internet lawyer. Yes it IS a trade secret. Theres a reason some games dont want ppl to know the number of subs they have. ANYTHING THEY DISCUSS in the meetings that has or (especially) will have an impact on the game them become trade secrets. Its like if Ford were in a meeting where theyre discussing the new transmission (here it would be code or a tweak or a fix or NeX items) theyre planning on putting on their newest car. No there are no CURRENT competitors to EVE out there, but how do we know there arent ppl planning on making something or deep in the coding of a new game thats yet unannounced that would be interested in snapping up info given out freely Which is kinda why transparency is a broken idea here. |

Cipher Jones
36
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 16:22:00 -
[200] - Quote
Headerman wrote:I am just surprised it took this long to implement SM3.
SM3 came out in 2004, and people are butthurt that they can't play Eve on their PC anymore?
Do yourself a favour, go out and buy a nice decent graphics card. Turn Eve settings up to max and enjoy.
Release too early and people will complain it cant be played on hardware that's still not legacy.
Release too late and people will play games with better graphics.
Damned if you dont damned if you do. although in all reality they were probably just waiting till it was "ready".
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |
|

Kengutsi Akira
GloboTech Industries
13
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 16:30:00 -
[201] - Quote
CCP Manifest, if i may be so bold...
tl;dr, CCP is a business. And as far as businesses go, they number one business goal is to stay in business. That is best done by having great products people are wanting to buy[/quote]
anyone else getting the feeling this is a troll by CCP AND the CSM? lol
|

Cailais
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
23
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 16:34:00 -
[202] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:
They are right in saying that nothing of detailed substance was said during the meeting--however there was apparently enough vague substance to convince them that the next meeting should be promising indeed. Convinced enough to decide to come to you guys and give a progress report, treading dangeous political waters. If the preliminary meeting didn't smell of enough Red Meat, I severely doubt they would be here at all. We didn't try to convince them to speak to you guys.
I hope in that context that CCP - at all levels - fully understands that for many of us our patience is no longer wearing thin, it has in fact worn through.
Of the dozen or so friends I used to attempt 'flying in space' with none play EVE any more.
That's right - zero.
C.
|

xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers Galactic-Rangers
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 16:57:00 -
[203] - Quote
Cailais wrote:CCP Manifest wrote:
They are right in saying that nothing of detailed substance was said during the meeting--however there was apparently enough vague substance to convince them that the next meeting should be promising indeed. Convinced enough to decide to come to you guys and give a progress report, treading dangeous political waters. If the preliminary meeting didn't smell of enough Red Meat, I severely doubt they would be here at all. We didn't try to convince them to speak to you guys.
I hope in that context that CCP - at all levels - fully understands that for many of us our patience is no longer wearing thin, it has in fact worn through. Of the dozen or so friends I used to attempt 'flying in space' with none play EVE any more. That's right - zero. C.
38.071 online, am i wrong or is it looking like a drop of about 12.000 players for an average saturday ?
having said that i have to add this, some peoeple just get bored of a game and move on, in eve everyone feels that they need to rant about being bored with it before they leave. some changes are good, some are fail, but lets be honest, changes will happen no matter how much you don't want them to.
all we can hope is that the CSM who i am really thankful to for all the hard work they do, can help make sure that these changes we see coming are for the better of the game in the future, and not that the game stays the same as it was way back when because some people can't stand change.
if you've fallen out of love with eve, leave her, she doesn't care how you feel,, just go.
but if you love eve, stay online and fight for better changes that keep eve as being the very best internet spaceship game there is.
|

Florestan Bronstein
United Engineering Services
35
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 17:02:00 -
[204] - Quote
xxxTRUSTxxx wrote:38.071 online, am i wrong or is it looking like a drop of about 12.000 players for an average saturday ?
it's the summer - everybody is on holidays
looks at calendar
it's the fall - people are back to school/work and have less time for EVE
(soon it will be winter and people will be too busy spending time with friends & family to play EVE) |

Nin Kimrov
Kenzi Arms and Munitions
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 17:20:00 -
[205] - Quote
Then when does people play the game? Only in spring? |

Lens Thirring
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 17:36:00 -
[206] - Quote
xxxTRUSTxxx wrote: 38.071 online, am i wrong or is it looking like a drop of about 12.000 players for an average saturday ?
This is why CCP has probably already been thinking seriously about their Eve development plans, and why we may be seeing some progress. By now they've looked at the summer numbers and done Hilmar's "say vs. do" calculation.
I'm not sure a handful of articles in gamer magazines, a good portion of which were not particularly negative towards CCP anyway, caused too many sleepless nights in Reykjavik. If anything, rather than fearing bad publicity, they may be jumping on an opportunity for good publicity which has been handed to them.
And, if it turns out that more resources are turned towards developing Eve, then good publicity is well-deserved. CCP will have shown itself to be responsive to the concerns players have voiced all summer.
Two step wrote: My own ideas on what should be added are irrelevant.
Thanks, CSM. It turns out that somebody who actually does have something relevant to say did turn up in this thread. Please go on about your self-important NDAed business.
We look forward to hearing more details, Manifest.
|

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
53
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 18:05:00 -
[207] - Quote
Well its good that the CSM is acting in such a way that it gets to presure CCP somewhat.
But another vague promise about action in the future is not enough for me, atm. On that at least I agree with the CSM.
PS: Glad to hear about the dead horse agreement. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Ein Spiegel
Fly-by-Night Industries LLC PTY LTD Drama Flakes
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 18:16:00 -
[208] - Quote
One thing, if you could mention it to them, and I would be appreciative.
After the cookie derp and the Incarna RAEG release, I thought maybe they decided not to publish any major changes or make any major changes just prior to the weekend. Y'know, on a Friday.
And here it is, the new forums went live at 10 after five... on a Friday. Is Screegs pulling overtime on the weekend just in case?
CCP may wonder why trust is such a hard sell to players. Could this be a reason?
Just sayin'. Making major changes ten minutes after typical "closing time" the day before a weekend might not be a great idea when you've made public statements that it wasn't going to happen again. (I guess it could have been worse... you could have done it before a long weekend for a major market share area.) |

Salpun
Paramount Commerce Masters of Flying Objects
26
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 18:18:00 -
[209] - Quote
Ein Spiegel wrote:One thing, if you could mention it to them, and I would be appreciative.
After the cookie derp and the Incarna RAEG release, I thought maybe they decided not to publish any major changes or make any major changes just prior to the weekend. Y'know, on a Friday.
And here it is, the new forums went live at 10 after five... on a Friday. Is Screegs pulling overtime on the weekend just in case?
CCP may wonder why trust is such a hard sell to players. Could this be a reason?
Just sayin'. Making major changes ten minutes after typical "closing time" the day before a weekend might not be a great idea when you've made public statements that it wasn't going to happen again. (I guess it could have been worse... you could have done it before a long weekend for a major market share area.) They went live on Tuesday the Old forums got sealed and put in storage on Friday. |

T'Laar Bok
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 18:22:00 -
[210] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:I had to sleep.
I take it you're not a miner then.
Amphetimines are your friend. |
|

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
115
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 18:26:00 -
[211] - Quote
Ein Spiegel wrote:One thing, if you could mention it to them, and I would be appreciative.
After the cookie derp and the Incarna RAEG release, I thought maybe they decided not to publish any major changes or make any major changes just prior to the weekend. Y'know, on a Friday.
And here it is, the new forums went live at 10 after five... on a Friday. Is Screegs pulling overtime on the weekend just in case?
CCP may wonder why trust is such a hard sell to players. Could this be a reason?
Just sayin'. Making major changes ten minutes after typical "closing time" the day before a weekend might not be a great idea when you've made public statements that it wasn't going to happen again. (I guess it could have been worse... you could have done it before a long weekend for a major market share area.)
Uh, new forums went live this monday. The old ones closed at 17:10 on Friday, but I don't see the issue here. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Florestan Bronstein
United Engineering Services
35
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 18:32:00 -
[212] - Quote
Nin Kimrov wrote:Then when does people play the game? Only in spring? you are looking at this issue from a wrong (dare I say outright timid) angle...
Do you know what players do for CCP?
- they increase bandwidth cost and stress the servers - they demand costly new features and bug fixes - they write petitions that have to be read and answered - they try everything to destroy CCP's reputation in the gaming media - they abuse the EVE IP without paying a single cent in royalties - they make CCP's employees suffer nervous breakdowns
players are BAD.
subscribers are GOOD.
You know what an exemplary subscriber does for CCP?
- he signs a permanent collection authorization and forgets about CCP & EVE.
Traditional wisdom says that most subscribers are also players and vice versa.
But that's literally the kind of thinking that made the dinosaurs go extinct.
CCP's strategy is to reduce the intersection of subscribers and players with the long-term goal of bringing the number of players down to zero (PROJECT ZERO). Every drop in PCU numbers is a step in the right direction.
This fearless innovation in business plans sets CCP apart from the competition and will guarantee its exponential growth for years to come. |

Neftaran
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 19:03:00 -
[213] - Quote
I truly do not see why do you space politicians even bother posting this type of information. It's getting so repetitive and pointless. You wave your saber around to garner some attention.. CCP lets things gestate for a few days and then low and behold it's time for a meeting. You have your meeting then regurgitate the same responses we've been hearing for years. Few months from now we will get some more space drama and the never ending spin cycle of b.s. will start over again.
Player representation is nothing more than an illusion. |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
422
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 19:15:00 -
[214] - Quote
Neftaran wrote:I truly do not see why do you space politicians even bother posting this type of information. It's getting so repetitive and pointless. You wave your saber around to garner some attention.. CCP lets things gestate for a few days and then low and behold it's time for a meeting. You have your meeting then regurgitate the same responses we've been hearing for years. Few months from now we will get some more space drama and the never ending spin cycle of b.s. will start over again.
Player representation is nothing more than an illusion.
Great, don't vote in CSM7, and I'll keep all this power and influence to myself. No big! |

Vicar2008
Royal Black Watch Highlanders Warped Aggression
19
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 19:31:00 -
[215] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Neftaran wrote:I truly do not see why do you space politicians even bother posting this type of information. It's getting so repetitive and pointless. You wave your saber around to garner some attention.. CCP lets things gestate for a few days and then low and behold it's time for a meeting. You have your meeting then regurgitate the same responses we've been hearing for years. Few months from now we will get some more space drama and the never ending spin cycle of b.s. will start over again.
Player representation is nothing more than an illusion. Great, don't vote in CSM7, and I'll keep all this power and influence to myself. No big!
And he aint kidding, Prema Donna that he is......... |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 19:57:00 -
[216] - Quote
as I read this thread, I see more and more that there is nothing that will make you guys happy; I understand and think its reasonable that people are upset, i mean Im upset too, but I understand as a programmer and a gamer that things take time
I keep reading things like "patch notes or GTFO" and I ask myself what do you want them to do? materialize thousands of hours of play testing and code out of nowhere? Im also of the opinion that we'll wait and see what CCP comes up with but the operative word in that position is WAIT.
Id rather wait 3 months and see what CCP comes out with, then if they fail I have a legitimate reason for being pissed off. the problem with most of you is you wont remember this thread or your problems in 3 months. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 19:57:00 -
[217] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote: because it is heavily NDA'd,6
Me and a friend discussed what we would like to do with your avatar. But, because of NDA's all I can say is it involved ropes and a riding crop. Stay tuned for more information.
We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
422
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 20:00:00 -
[218] - Quote
It's also funny that there are idiots who think that the CSM has any choice as to what is NDA'd and what isn't; if it was up to us, we'd tell you what the meeting was about. But in this case it's Zulu's decision. vOv |

Ravcharas
GREY COUNCIL Nulli Secunda
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 20:12:00 -
[219] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:It's also funny that there are idiots who think that the CSM has any choice as to what is NDA'd and what isn't; if it was up to us, we'd tell you what the meeting was about. But in this case it's Zulu's decision. vOv Just out of curiosity, do you feel waving the NDA was justified in this particular case?
I mean it's hard to imagine the WoW and Old Republic devs waiting for CCP to open its collective mouth and then run back to rejigger their thingamabobs to start locking in the serious spaceship demographic.
I guess the perp duders might be interested but they probably have basic infrastructure things still to deal with.
|

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
115
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 20:22:00 -
[220] - Quote
Ravcharas wrote:The Mittani wrote:It's also funny that there are idiots who think that the CSM has any choice as to what is NDA'd and what isn't; if it was up to us, we'd tell you what the meeting was about. But in this case it's Zulu's decision. vOv Just out of curiosity, do you feel waving the NDA was justified in this particular case? I mean it's hard to imagine the WoW and Old Republic devs waiting for CCP to open its collective mouth and then run back to rejigger their thingamabobs to start locking in the serious spaceship demographic. I guess the perp duders might be interested but they probably have basic infrastructure things still to deal with.
In general, we nearly always urge CCP to make things public as soon as possible. This meeting wasn't an exception to that rule. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |
|

Eladaris
Excessum Industries Excessum Gaming
76
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 20:27:00 -
[221] - Quote
Sigras wrote:I keep reading things like "patch notes or GTFO" and I ask myself what do you want them to do? materialize thousands of hours of play testing and code out of nowhere? Im also of the opinion that we'll wait and see what CCP comes up with but the operative word in that position is WAIT.
Non Eve Player found!
A) A major headline feature of the last expansion (new ship skins) was done by CCP employees in their free time.
B) A wonderful feature of the next expansion (Logi warp speeds) is probably nothing more than adding a .75 to a table, changing the number from 3.0 to 3.75.
C) The EHP SCap nerf for October shouldn't be much more involved. If you're tuning down health totals, it's probably just playing with numbers on another table.
D) If you had seen any of the often hilarious unintended bugs that rolled outta CCP in any of the last patches you'd know they don't do unit testing. I get the feeling most of their testing is run by the player's during mass tests or on SiSI. Although, from hearing the people QQ about previously submitted bugs that go live with the various releases I'm not even sure CCP can be bothered to read those forums / bug reports.
E) And whenever CCP decides to deliver the Incarna Catwalk from the fashion show... well... eww. |

Lens Thirring
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 21:18:00 -
[222] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:It's also funny that there are idiots who think that the CSM has any choice as to what is NDA'd and what isn't; if it was up to us, we'd tell you what the meeting was about. But in this case it's Zulu's decision. vOv You might have attempted to approach this particular discussion outside of the NDA, if you felt NDA-privvy material is not relevant, and if it would allow you to better represent the players. You know what you need to know: you've guessed that population is down from PCU numbers, and you have your own proposal to fix that. No NDA information is needed on your side. CCP might have to be selective on their side of the conversation, but at the end of the day it's their job to satisfy you (you're the guy with all that power, right?) that they're putting more work into Eve.
NDA or not, the notion that the CSM couldn't inform players of its own concrete bargaining position, as suggested earlier in the thread, is nonsense. In that case, you've colluded with CCP in effectively shutting players out of the conversation without even letting them know what you're specifically bargaining for in their name. We have no way to gauge your effectiveness, because anything better than zero can be represented as a hard-fought victory.
In any case, this NDA is being treated in an unconventional way by the CSM. It must be a very strange and unique document, or CCP a very lenient partner. I believe the CSM comprises some professionals and an unemployed lawyer. Would you regard this as normal operating procedure, flaunting NDA-embargoed discussions and the NDA itself on a public forum? Often there are clauses about stuff like that, and even politicians have to observe those clauses when they'd rather be using them to drum up support.
Players are objecting to the way you are making lots of "look at me!" noise, but hiding behind the NDA whenever someone tries to pin you down on specifics. That just makes you look slippery. |

BuckStrider
Nano-Tech Experiments
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 21:29:00 -
[223] - Quote
It's all a bunch of crap and I'm not putting up with it anymore.
Mittens spews so much waste, you can't tell the difference between his arse and his mouth. It just flows so naturally.
Yes, yes Mitani...We know...You were for CCP before you were against CCP. Your going to 'drain the swamp' of corruption. Blah, blah.blah.....
I call 'bull' on the released minutes of the 'Emergency Meeting' because your sock puppet White Tree came out and said they had to be summited to CCP for approval...3 months and at least 5 re-writes later, how do I know what is true, what is false, and what has been omited?
CCP just lies and thier quality of a product has REALLY gone downhill. It's really just that simple. No witty anology is needed. If I ever pulled what these guys do, I'd have been out of business a long time ago. Since I'm in the contractor business, I probably would have went to jail as well.
So CCP -insert employee name- can come on here, or in game, or on some news site and say what they want and all you have to do, as a reader, is just say 'bullshirt' after your done reading....90% of the time, it most likely is.
Then there is the definition of the NDA. The most common definition is 'Non Disclosure Agreement'. But that's not the case here. The real meaning,here in EVE, is 'Not Doing Anything' ....So, whenever you read something that can't be said because of NDA...Just rember it means 'Not Doing Anything'
Come the 3rd week here this month when CCP comes to get thier subscription, going to find out that they will be under my 'NDA"
Not Depositing Assets
Was a good run for 6 3/4 years. |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
127
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 21:31:00 -
[224] - Quote
Lens Thirring wrote:The Mittani wrote:It's also funny that there are idiots who think that the CSM has any choice as to what is NDA'd and what isn't; if it was up to us, we'd tell you what the meeting was about. But in this case it's Zulu's decision. vOv You might have attempted to approach this particular discussion outside of the NDA, if you felt NDA-privvy material is not relevant, and if it would allow you to better represent the players. You know what you need to know: you've guessed that population is down from PCU numbers, and you have your own proposal to fix that. No NDA information is needed on your side. CCP might have to be selective on their side of the conversation, but at the end of the day it's their job to satisfy you (you're the guy with all that power, right?) that they're putting more work into Eve. NDA or not, the notion that the CSM couldn't inform players of its own concrete bargaining position, as suggested earlier in the thread, is nonsense. In that case, you've colluded with CCP in effectively shutting players out of the conversation without even letting them know what you're specifically bargaining for in their name. We have no way to gauge your effectiveness, because anything better than zero can be represented as a hard-fought victory. In any case, this NDA is being treated in an unconventional way by the CSM. It must be a very strange and unique document, or CCP a very lenient partner. I believe the CSM comprises some professionals and an unemployed lawyer. Would you regard this as normal operating procedure, flaunting NDA-embargoed discussions and the NDA itself on a public forum? Often there are clauses about stuff like that, and even politicians have to observe those clauses when they'd rather be using them to drum up support. Players are objecting to the way you are making lots of "look at me!" noise, but hiding behind the NDA whenever someone tries to pin you down on specifics. That just makes you look slippery.
Our bargaining position is that CCP needs to devote more resources to FiS. We obviously want as much as we can get. The NDA we signed doesn't require we keep the existence of the NDA secret or anything like that. I don't see how it is strange, we asked Zulu what we would be allowed to say, and that is basically exactly what we have said. Otherwise, the entire conversation would have been covered and we wouldn't have been able to say that we talked to him at all. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Nin Kimrov
Kenzi Arms and Munitions
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 21:38:00 -
[225] - Quote
Florestan Bronstein wrote:Nin Kimrov wrote:Then when does people play the game? Only in spring? you are looking at this issue from a wrong (dare I say outright timid) angle... Do you know what players do for CCP? - they increase bandwidth cost and stress the servers - they demand costly new features and bug fixes - they write petitions that have to be read and answered - they try everything to destroy CCP's reputation in the gaming media - they abuse the EVE IP without paying a single cent in royalties - they make CCP's employees suffer nervous breakdowns players are BAD. subscribers are GOOD. You know what an exemplary subscriber does for CCP? - he signs a permanent collection authorization and forgets about CCP & EVE. Traditional wisdom says that most subscribers are also players and vice versa. But that's literally the kind of thinking that made the dinosaurs go extinct. CCP's strategy is to reduce the intersection of subscribers and players with the long-term goal of bringing the number of players down to zero (PROJECT ZERO). Every drop in PCU numbers is a step in the right direction. This fearless innovation in business plans sets CCP apart from the competition and will guarantee its exponential growth for years to come.
I never through it like that. On one side, to attire more people, you want a community in the game and more peoples. On the other side, you want to minimize your cost.
|

Eladaris
Excessum Industries Excessum Gaming
76
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 21:47:00 -
[226] - Quote
Nin Kimrov wrote:I never through it like that. On one side, to attire more people, you want a community in the game and more peoples.
I see what you did there... |

Nin Kimrov
Kenzi Arms and Munitions
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 21:54:00 -
[227] - Quote
Eladaris wrote:Nin Kimrov wrote:I never through it like that. On one side, to attire more people, you want a community in the game and more peoples. I see what you did there...
Well, I don't believe people would be happy to play with bots. |

Eladaris
Excessum Industries Excessum Gaming
76
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 21:57:00 -
[228] - Quote
Nin Kimrov wrote:Eladaris wrote:Nin Kimrov wrote:I never through it like that. On one side, to attire more people, you want a community in the game and more peoples. I see what you did there... Well, I don't believe people would be happy to play with bots.
Ah... never mind... I gave you too much credit for what apparently was an accident. Sorry! |

Wind Jammer
Molden Heath Software Company
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 21:59:00 -
[229] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
...
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
That's an interesting assertion you've made there that I've underlined. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Zulu is the Senior Producer of EVE, not the Producer of Dust or WoD. Nor is he in charge of software engineering or staff allocation at CCP. Most especially, he is not in charge of corporate strategy which, as we know, has Dust has the number 1 priority, as a number of CCP staff have confirmed in invterviews freely available on the internet.
My point being, you are labouring a point with the wrong person. But well done for finally waking up to the problem that's been evident to everyone else for the last 1.5 years. 
|

Kno Bodeesbitch
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 22:09:00 -
[230] - Quote
I think this guys said it best here...
MrZany wrote:I want to share a perspective on the current drama based on my real life business experience. Before I start I want to make it clear that I in no way support CCP's flawed roll out of Incarna or Hilmar and Zulu's behavior. That being said...
When I was a younger man my passion was bodybuilding (yes, I am a muscle head that plays Eve, I admit I must look quite ridiculous), it was my passion.
At a certain point I decided to put my passion to work for me and opened a World Gym with some similar minded friends.
This was in the 90's when bodybuilding was the rage. Our gym did very well and we catered specifically to the "hard core" bodybuilding set. Getting big was SERIOUS BUSINESS to our customers.
They would:
wake up at 4 am to get to the gym
eat no calories during the day that did not advance their muscle growth
maybe they even crossed to the dark side and used "boosters" (never had any proof but some guys were just freakishly large)
I could go on but the point is that to our clientele this gym was their world; they suffered no fools. If you weren't serious GTFO.
We had a lot of clients start toward their goal of getting "huge" or even just fit every January, but come May most would be gone. This was expected and was factored into our business model. Getting fit is requires a level of discipline that most people cannot keep up year round. Looking like a magazine model is next to impossible. However we had enough people that wanted to try.
We were doing very well, but we noticed that other gyms were undercutting our prices dramatically. Along with their lower prices they were marketing fitness in a different way. "No need to try so hard"...."its not serious business"..."just pay us every month and you will feel and look better". The truth was they were just selling memberships expecting not to see their clients ever again. And the monthly rate was so low that people never canceled. They were raking in the dough and having less overhead and wear and tear on their equipment than we were. It became about volume...quantity over quality.
We were forced to adapt. Our "serious" clients were pissed! We weren't just changing a "gym" we were changing their "world". We sympathized...it was our world too...we were all working out next to them on our off hours. However, we also had bills to pay...
What does this have to do with Eve?!?!?
Eve as far as I understand it was started by a bunch of guys whose passion was FIS.
To Eve players FIS is SERIOUS BUSINESS...they will:
Wake up at any hour to log in their supers
Play with EFT for hours just to squeeze out a bit of extra performance from their ships
Hang on a POS for hours waiting for the call to jump during a CTA
Maybe they will even cross over to the dark side and bot
Hard core Eve players are disciplined and also suffer no fools in their midst. With the introduction of Incarna, Eve doesn't seem to be catering to the "real" Eve player and the serious business guys are pissed. Unfortunately, most people are, IMO, not capable or willing to devote the endless hours and exert the necessary diligence to be a successful Eve player.
This is were I think CCP finds itself...they created a fine world where hard core, serious individuals could prosper, yet the volume just isn't there. This has, IMO, caused them to switch gears to a different business model. It is now about volume and possibly catering to a more casual type of player.
I don't like it...no different than I like to see someone wasting their time on an "ab roller" but I understand it, at least from my anecdotal experience.
Thanks for reading
and here...
MrZany wrote:
With respect to your point about equipment,look at it another way.
From CCP's standpoint it may make sense to have a certain portion of their player base in station at any given time. Less lag perhaps. Less wear and tear on the equipment, less demand for resources.( I don't say this with any certainty)
Remember,your hard core members are always going to be coming to you with their latest "need", I used to have guys come into my office with pictures of some exotic piece of equipment that they just had to have in order to reach their goal.
Casual members were just happy to have the basics; some cardio equipment and some light weights. Both types of members paid the same membership fee. From a business standpoint the casual member was more desirable. From a personal standpoint (remember we were bodybuilders ourselves) we loved to have the passionate clients in the gym.
In some ways it was a relief to have the more intense members leave especially if they were "bad mouthing" our business as we changed our business model, just from a stress stand point (we were only human), but in the long run it made sense for us to try to walk the fine line of keeping MOST of our clients happy. It wasn't easy and we had 1300 members at our peak to contend with.
With the numbers that CCP has to make happy it is infinitely harder.
What I learned is that as long as you keep things clean, fix broken equipment expeditiously, you are responsive, and you at least make a good faith effort to address everyone's needs (even if you tell them why you can't give them what they "need" at that moment) your more reasonable clients (which is most people IMO) will stay with you.
|
|

AnzacPaul
Perkone Caldari State
77
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 22:25:00 -
[231] - Quote
I wrote a reply about three times and erased it each time. I'm done.
See you all after Winter's patch, provided CCP get their **** together. |

Kengutsi Akira
GloboTech Industries
13
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 22:26:00 -
[232] - Quote
Two step wrote:Ravcharas wrote:The Mittani wrote:It's also funny that there are idiots who think that the CSM has any choice as to what is NDA'd and what isn't; if it was up to us, we'd tell you what the meeting was about. But in this case it's Zulu's decision. vOv Just out of curiosity, do you feel waving the NDA was justified in this particular case? I mean it's hard to imagine the WoW and Old Republic devs waiting for CCP to open its collective mouth and then run back to rejigger their thingamabobs to start locking in the serious spaceship demographic. I guess the perp duders might be interested but they probably have basic infrastructure things still to deal with. In general, we nearly always urge CCP to make things public as soon as possible. This meeting wasn't an exception to that rule. no but the flag waving of the NDA seems to be a new deal |

Phelan Votronski
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 22:47:00 -
[233] - Quote
Good to know a professional is on the job now. CCP Zulu/Zulupark best known for his pioneer work in eve online:
- Carrier nerf that didn't happen - 18 Months - 99$ token charge - shameless lip service - 1000$ japanese pants
What could go wrong? |

Lens Thirring
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 22:56:00 -
[234] - Quote
Two step wrote: Our bargaining position is that CCP needs to devote more resources to FiS. We obviously want as much as we can get.
I love going into a meeting with people who don't have a specific objective. Everybody walks out feeling like a winner (but only one of us actually is).
You guys are threatening to go nuclear in the media. I assumed before this was decided, some deep thinking about what could and should be achieved might have been done.
As I've said before, if you are asking for "more", I guess you will have no problem achieving it. Luckily it seems that CCP have spontaneously decided to back you guys up in some way (probably having already come to the same conclusions on their own) before you had to worry very much about this.
Quote: The NDA we signed doesn't require we keep the existence of the NDA secret or anything like that. I don't see how it is strange, we asked Zulu what we would be allowed to say, and that is basically exactly what we have said. Otherwise, the entire conversation would have been covered and we wouldn't have been able to say that we talked to him at all.
That's okay, none of my business really. The "we're doing important stuff on your behalf, honest, but can't tell you what we're doing" sounded somewhat politically motivated. Some people are already trying to construct a narrative based on their elite negotiating skillz, with no facts to back it up. But a lot of people seem to have appreciated the heads-up about the meeting in any case.
Anyhow, let's hope CCP comes up with a good plan.
|

London
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 23:16:00 -
[235] - Quote
Dudes, this is what's happening for FiS this winter: MMORPG.com interview
It sounds like a really impressive laundry list of features and balances, everything this bitter Eve player could hope for. :P |

Crexa
Star Mandate
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 23:35:00 -
[236] - Quote
London wrote:Dudes, this is what's happening for FiS this winter: MMORPG.com interviewIt sounds like a really impressive laundry list of features and balances, everything this bitter Eve player could hope for. :P
You can't be serious. Yes I agree that what is mentioned in this article is good news, but an expansion it does not make.
Where is the meat? I see a lot of salad and gravy but no meat. 3 new CQs is something, but not meat, weve seen one, are you seriously going to be impressed longer than 2 minutes with each of the new ones? And an "establishment"? really? How about an open station to walk around in? The ability to interact with others? Huge view of space from inside the station like some of the dramatic images weve seen.
How about new regions? New ships? New modules? How about bringing back minefields to counter Supers, or new weapon systems for dreads to counter them? How about access finally to Jove space, they have been fricken building up to that forever.
So all I say is where is the MEAT?
|

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
127
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 23:37:00 -
[237] - Quote
London wrote:Dudes, this is what's happening for FiS this winter: MMORPG.com interviewIt sounds like a really impressive laundry list of features and balances, everything this bitter Eve player could hope for. :P
We certainly approve of that list of stuff, much of that is the stuff that is very high on our priority list. I would still like to see things like the POS rewrite, Corp Bookmarks, new ships and skills, and most especially new tools for players to build things in the sandbox with. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

BuckStrider
Nano-Tech Experiments
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 23:40:00 -
[238] - Quote
London wrote:Dudes, this is what's happening for FiS this winter: MMORPG.com interviewIt sounds like a really impressive laundry list of features and balances, everything this bitter Eve player could hope for. :P
Cool story bro.
I've got this bridge located in New York City that's for sale too.
|

Zeke Megadeth
BLOODW0LVES
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.10 23:43:00 -
[239] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:It's also funny that there are idiots who think that the CSM is anything other than a PR tool for CCP. vOv
Fixed.
|

London
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 00:34:00 -
[240] - Quote
Crexa wrote:London wrote:Dudes, this is what's happening for FiS this winter: MMORPG.com interviewIt sounds like a really impressive laundry list of features and balances, everything this bitter Eve player could hope for. :P You can't be serious. Yes I agree that what is mentioned in this article is good news, but an expansion it does not make. Where is the meat? I see a lot of salad and gravy but no meat. 3 new CQs is something, but not meat, weve seen one, are you seriously going to be impressed longer than 2 minutes with each of the new ones? And an "establishment"? really? How about an open station to walk around in? The ability to interact with others? Huge view of space from inside the station like some of the dramatic images weve seen. How about new regions? New ships? New modules? How about bringing back minefields to counter Supers, or new weapon systems for dreads to counter them? How about access finally to Jove space, they have been fricken building up to that forever. So all I say is where is the MEAT?
I'm paying more attention to this part, why are you so focused on CQ?
"One of the main goals of the expansion is to enhance the smaller skirmishes in EVE, and make them a larger part of the game as opposed to the epic and massive wars the game has become known for. The team wants to incentivize skirmishes and give a role to the other lesser-used ships and give smaller groups of players more ways to feel important in the game. The first step will be to look at the gameGÇÖs current caps, and theyGÇÖre definitely going to be buffing Dreads, while nerfing the Super Carriers a bit. TheyGÇÖre going to also take long hard looks at frigates, cruisers, and other smaller ships to give them a more effective role in the overall scheme of things."
I long for ship and weapon balance, not CQ... |
|

gargars
Cohesion Inc Beyond-Repair
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 00:34:00 -
[241] - Quote
Ein Spiegel wrote:One thing, if you could mention it to them, and I would be appreciative.
After the cookie derp and the Incarna RAEG release, I thought maybe they decided not to publish any major changes or make any major changes just prior to the weekend. Y'know, on a Friday.
And here it is, the new forums went live at 10 after five... on a Friday. Is Screegs pulling overtime on the weekend just in case?
CCP may wonder why trust is such a hard sell to players. Could this be a reason?
Just sayin'. Making major changes ten minutes after typical "closing time" the day before a weekend might not be a great idea when you've made public statements that it wasn't going to happen again. (I guess it could have been worse... you could have done it before a long weekend for a major market share area.)
Lol glad I am not the only one who noticed this. Just last week I was reading how CCP realized rolling anything new out right before the weekend was stupid, especially after the last 'new forum roll out'.... and here we go again... even with the exact same item even if it was just the closure of the old forums. I am honestly starting to believe that the different areas at CCP don't communicate with each other. |

Lelob
SniggWaffe
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 00:54:00 -
[242] - Quote
Hey,
I'm going to make a thread telling you about how we're maybe-probably-somewhat doing something about EVE, or talking about maybe-probably-somewhat doing something about EVE, possibly even CCP doing something too. But we can't tell you what.
Why the hell do I even bother reading these threads if all you have to say is NDA up the keeshter? |

Eladaris
Excessum Industries Excessum Gaming
77
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 00:57:00 -
[243] - Quote
London wrote:
I'm paying more attention to this part, why are you so focused on CQ?
"One of the main goals of the expansion is to enhance the smaller skirmishes in EVE, and make them a larger part of the game as opposed to the epic and massive wars the game has become known for. The team wants to incentivize skirmishes and give a role to the other lesser-used ships and give smaller groups of players more ways to feel important in the game. The first step will be to look at the gameGÇÖs current caps, and theyGÇÖre definitely going to be buffing Dreads, while nerfing the Super Carriers a bit. TheyGÇÖre going to also take long hard looks at frigates, cruisers, and other smaller ships to give them a more effective role in the overall scheme of things."
I long for ship and weapon balance, not CQ...
So you really liked that section. Did you keep reading?
"When I asked how they were then going to incentivize this behavior, the team didnGÇÖt have real specifics"
We already know about the Dreads / SCap stuff but if you're into the rest... "the team didnGÇÖt have real specifics" |

London
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 00:58:00 -
[244] - Quote
Eladaris wrote:London wrote:
I'm paying more attention to this part, why are you so focused on CQ?
"One of the main goals of the expansion is to enhance the smaller skirmishes in EVE, and make them a larger part of the game as opposed to the epic and massive wars the game has become known for. The team wants to incentivize skirmishes and give a role to the other lesser-used ships and give smaller groups of players more ways to feel important in the game. The first step will be to look at the gameGÇÖs current caps, and theyGÇÖre definitely going to be buffing Dreads, while nerfing the Super Carriers a bit. TheyGÇÖre going to also take long hard looks at frigates, cruisers, and other smaller ships to give them a more effective role in the overall scheme of things."
I long for ship and weapon balance, not CQ...
So you really liked that section. Did you keep reading? "When I asked how they were then going to incentivize this behavior, the team didnGÇÖt have real specifics" We already know about the Dreads / SCap stuff but if you're into the rest... "the team didnGÇÖt have real specifics"
One can hope... |

Salpun
Paramount Commerce Masters of Flying Objects
27
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 01:06:00 -
[245] - Quote
London wrote:Crexa wrote:London wrote:Dudes, this is what's happening for FiS this winter: MMORPG.com interviewIt sounds like a really impressive laundry list of features and balances, everything this bitter Eve player could hope for. :P You can't be serious. Yes I agree that what is mentioned in this article is good news, but an expansion it does not make. Where is the meat? I see a lot of salad and gravy but no meat. 3 new CQs is something, but not meat, weve seen one, are you seriously going to be impressed longer than 2 minutes with each of the new ones? And an "establishment"? really? How about an open station to walk around in? The ability to interact with others? Huge view of space from inside the station like some of the dramatic images weve seen. How about new regions? New ships? New modules? How about bringing back minefields to counter Supers, or new weapon systems for dreads to counter them? How about access finally to Jove space, they have been fricken building up to that forever. So all I say is where is the MEAT? I'm paying more attention to this part, why are you so focused on CQ? "One of the main goals of the expansion is to enhance the smaller skirmishes in EVE, and make them a larger part of the game as opposed to the epic and massive wars the game has become known for. The team wants to incentivize skirmishes and give a role to the other lesser-used ships and give smaller groups of players more ways to feel important in the game. The first step will be to look at the gameGÇÖs current caps, and theyGÇÖre definitely going to be buffing Dreads, while nerfing the Super Carriers a bit. TheyGÇÖre going to also take long hard looks at frigates, cruisers, and other smaller ships to give them a more effective role in the overall scheme of things." I long for ship and weapon balance, not CQ...
Part of the reason is that some of the new high sec smuggling mini profesion requires the CQ. The current Sisi build is graphics tweaks. When they have deployed what, they can develope further on a base they know that works.
Go team BFF |

MailDeadDrop
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 03:50:00 -
[246] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:This is a very fair point. Thanks for bringing it up. Posterior kiss accepted. 
CCP Manifest wrote:I'd been talking to the CSM about something entirely unrelated a day or two before, but since I already knew what the content of yesterday's dialogue was going to be, I requested to be a part of the meeting as a fly on the wall. CCP Xhagen graciously accepted my request. Now see, right here I have a problem. Was the list of attendees something held in abeyance by the NDA? (If so, that's a terrible interpretation.) Because up until your post the impression given was that most of the CSM delegates had a Skype conference with CCP Zulu. Granted it isn't a huge factual omission, but since the meeting's only significant facts are "where" (Skype), "when" (last Friday). and "who" (CSM and CCP Zulu), with "what" and "why" being apparently embargoed by NDA, one would think it would be fairly trivial to be reported correctly.
CCP Manifest wrote:Obviously, since I am also under NDA as an employee (and since I'm part of the evil team of the one single guy in public relations that pursues press opportunities) I too cannot reveal the main bulk of the conversation. Kidding aside Manifest, your dealings with CCPs public puts the rest of CCP to great shame. Speaking personally, it is your fault that I read the rest of CCP's PR attempts and go "WTF? Are these people baboons?" For your under-applauded efforts, I owe you all the banana daquiris you can stomache (when next we meet).
CCP Manifest wrote:They are right in saying that nothing of detailed substance was said during the meeting--however there was apparently enough vague substance to convince them that the next meeting should be promising indeed. Convinced enough to decide to come to you guys and give a progress report, treading dangeous political waters. And here is where I must turn the lash on the CSM. They should've kept their mouths shut until after the next meeting at a minimum. I fail to see any positive impact for the playerbase by their posting. As best as I can tell, all they've accomplished is to create a platform for their own unseemly self-aggrandizement. I expect better of them.
CCP Manifest wrote:Hope that addresses some of the meta-comments here about the CSM's behavior/communications. Sorry about the delay in coming here. I had to sleep. Ned, I don't begrudge you a second's sleep, and I apologize to you if my replies seem undeservedly harsh. But leaving aside the question of the wisdom of having this meeting on Friday afternoon (which was surely not your choice), does it seem unreasonable for CCP to anticipate that the CSM post would blossom into a little threadnaught, and that CCP would be well-served to have a prepared confirmatory post ready to go?
If you take away nothing else from my replies, please take away this: CCP has freely admitted that the largest single component in their recent Eve troubles has been poor communication. Are CCP such masochists that they will only admit the problem, but take no effective corrective action? I, and I believe others, desperately want CCP to do better.
MDD
|

KaarBaak
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 03:59:00 -
[247] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote: As best as I can tell, all they've accomplished is to create a platform for their own unseemly self-aggrandizement. That isn't their purpose? MailDeadDrop wrote:I expect better of them. Yeah....you should really stop doing that. You'll only end up disappointed.
|
|

CCP Manifest
C C P C C P Alliance
43

|
Posted - 2011.09.11 04:59:00 -
[248] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote:CCP Manifest wrote:I'd been talking to the CSM about something entirely unrelated a day or two before, but since I already knew what the content of yesterday's dialogue was going to be, I requested to be a part of the meeting as a fly on the wall. CCP Xhagen graciously accepted my request. Now see, right here I have a problem. Was the list of attendees something held in abeyance by the NDA? (If so, that's a terrible interpretation.) Because up until your post the impression given was that most of the CSM delegates had a Skype conference with CCP Zulu. Granted it isn't a huge factual omission, but since the meeting's only significant facts are "where" (Skype), "when" (last Friday). and "who" (CSM and CCP Zulu), with "what" and "why" being apparently embargoed by NDA, one would think it would be fairly trivial to be reported correctly. CCP Manifest wrote:Obviously, since I am also under NDA as an employee (and since I'm part of the evil team of the one single guy in public relations that pursues press opportunities) I too cannot reveal the main bulk of the conversation. Kidding aside Manifest, your dealings with CCPs public puts the rest of CCP to great shame. Speaking personally, it is your fault that I read the rest of CCP's PR attempts and go "WTF? Are these people baboons?" For your under-applauded efforts, I owe you all the banana daquiris you can stomache (when next we meet). CCP Manifest wrote:They are right in saying that nothing of detailed substance was said during the meeting--however there was apparently enough vague substance to convince them that the next meeting should be promising indeed. Convinced enough to decide to come to you guys and give a progress report, treading dangeous political waters. And here is where I must turn the lash on the CSM. They should've kept their mouths shut until after the next meeting at a minimum. I fail to see any positive impact for the playerbase by their posting. As best as I can tell, all they've accomplished is to create a platform for their own unseemly self-aggrandizement. I expect better of them. CCP Manifest wrote:Hope that addresses some of the meta-comments here about the CSM's behavior/communications. Sorry about the delay in coming here. I had to sleep. Ned, I don't begrudge you a second's sleep, and I apologize to you if my replies seem undeservedly harsh. But leaving aside the question of the wisdom of having this meeting on Friday afternoon (which was surely not your choice), does it seem unreasonable for CCP to anticipate that the CSM post would blossom into a little threadnaught, and that CCP would be well-served to have a prepared confirmatory post ready to go? If you take away nothing else from my replies, please take away this: CCP has freely admitted that the largest single component in their recent Eve troubles has been poor communication. Are CCP such masochists that they will only admit the problem, but take no effective corrective action? I, and I believe others, desperately want CCP to do better. MDD |
|
|

CCP Manifest
C C P C C P Alliance
43

|
Posted - 2011.09.11 05:03:00 -
[249] - Quote
Apparently my TLDR joke actually Manifest'd itself. HARDY HAR HAR. The rest of my post:
MailDeadDrop wrote:If you take away nothing else from my replies, please take away this: CCP has freely admitted that the largest single component in their recent Eve troubles has been poor communication. Are CCP such masochists that they will only admit the problem, but take no effective corrective action? I, and I believe others, desperately want CCP to do better.
I will definitely take away that from your replies. As I said before..."PR"/Communication isn't a monolithic thing within CCP, to be sure. Running everything through a filter... or through my filter... would be a horrifying homogeneous apocolypse. But yes, you are right, there is definitely room for improvement.
Most CCPers are indeed mascochists. Else why would we even develop EVE Online? HAVE YOU SEEN THE DEATH PENALTY ?! |
|

Elyssa MacLeod
GloboTech Industries
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 05:23:00 -
[250] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote: I expect better of them.
Ill probably keep reading but I stopped right there. What exactly made you expect more of them based on their behavior up till now?
KaarBaak wrote:MailDeadDrop wrote: As best as I can tell, all they've accomplished is to create a platform for their own unseemly self-aggrandizement. That isn't their purpose?  MailDeadDrop wrote:I expect better of them. Yeah....you should really stop doing that. You'll only end up disappointed.
best post so far **** FiS Its Called EVE |
|

cyllan anassan
DEUS EX 1
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 07:59:00 -
[251] - Quote
J Kunjeh wrote:Azelor Delaria wrote: You want to prove you're on our side, then tell CCP to f*** off on the NDA just once. If the entire CSM says, "You know what? The NDA is good, but transparency was promised, and you owe the players that much", what is CCP going to do? Fire you all? You don't work for them. Are they going to kick you off the CSM? If you truly want to help, then let your balls drop - all of you and put your money where your mouth is. All we see if pussyfooting around the subjects with vague insinuations and non-specific threads. It gets old.
You're totally clueless about the real world, obviously, so I'll help you out: NDA's have LEGAL standing and those who break them can be sued in court. So yeah, NONE of them are likely to break NDA and for damn good reason. Fool...
let them, i want to see what happens if a player/s gets sued by the gaming company.
you think the player base is going to take it? |

P42ALPHA
Three 6 MaFiA KRYSIS.
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 08:07:00 -
[252] - Quote
How about a little less cuddle talk and a little more action. All this crap throughing still has not brought us any substantial updates since Incursions. Just more of. "Oh ya we hear you, new stuff coming soon" Like always.
Is this a plan? While ccp and the csm wave there hands over there. Nothing gets done over here? Seems that way.
Incarna dose not count as content imo.
But thank you thank you thank you for the ship timer change. A step the the right direction:) |

Pod Amarr
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 09:20:00 -
[253] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Two step wrote:We all wish we could say more, but the rules are the rules. Those rules clearly undermine your usefulness.
Like they ever been useful.
Looking at the server concurrent player count 2 things are visible long term numbers are going down.
No more breaking records in a long time. Problem is that the suits did not get the quarterly xls sheets yet.
As far as why we there are hundreds of pages about it waste of space to write them out again.
As long as CCP does not wake up is going to continue.
I am pretty sure all the people that have cancelled are receiving the ammount of spam from CCP as I do which is quite a lot to reactivate and a lot of people were on long term subs that still have to expire so the full numbers still did not come in.
So there is still couple thousands of account semi active like this one with people logging to train skills but not much else.
|

Trebor Daehdoow
Sane Industries Inc.
97
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 11:05:00 -
[254] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote:And here is where I must turn the lash on the CSM. They should've kept their mouths shut until after the next meeting at a minimum. I fail to see any positive impact for the playerbase by their posting. As best as I can tell, all they've accomplished is to create a platform for their own unseemly self-aggrandizement. I expect better of them. Alas, damned if we do, damned if we don't.
If we say nothing, we get yelled at for being useless do-nothing morons.
If we say what we feel comfortable saying (which is not much right now, alas), we get yelled at for being useless desperate attention whores.
If we say too much, we compromise our ability to advocate on behalf of the community, because CCP will tell us less.
Bottom line, my policy is always to do what I think is in the best interests of the community, regardless of the personal consequences, subject to the legal obligations I have placed myself under by signing the NDA.
I believe I am doing so now, as are the other members of the CSM. If it turns out that I'm wrong, then I'll happily take my lumps.
CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM bl... |

Sofia Bellard
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
22
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 11:37:00 -
[255] - Quote
CCP and CSM,
I believe what we all are saying is; we have listened to many promises before and virtually all of them have been broken. Either by thing 'you' say will happen, blah, blah and they never do. Your words have now just turned into that, words only. Truly the only thing that we will respond to now is what you do and not what you say. That goes for both CCP and CSM.
Not trying to sound off a meme, but this is in fact correct. Your words literally mean nothing to us anymore. The trust is gone. Only what you do (as in what you put on TQ) will bring the trust back. No amount of trailers, dev blogs, news articles, threads or anything like that will make us believe in you again.
So how about it? As a way to help rebuild that trust, why are you waiting to deploy the change to logistics warp speed and the Dramiel change? Why isn't this change on SiSi right now? Again, we only believe what action you do now. Your words, mean nothing right now.
Poor sad little pirates, -áwhy you so mad? |

Vicar2008
Royal Black Watch Highlanders Warped Aggression
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 12:21:00 -
[256] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:MailDeadDrop wrote:And here is where I must turn the lash on the CSM. They should've kept their mouths shut until after the next meeting at a minimum. I fail to see any positive impact for the playerbase by their posting. As best as I can tell, all they've accomplished is to create a platform for their own unseemly self-aggrandizement. I expect better of them. Alas, damned if we do, damned if we don't. If we say nothing, we get yelled at for being useless do-nothing morons. If we say what we feel comfortable saying (which is not much right now, alas), we get yelled at for being useless desperate attention whores. If we say too much, we compromise our ability to advocate on behalf of the community, because CCP will tell us less. Bottom line, my policy is always to do what I think is in the best interests of the community, regardless of the personal consequences, subject to the legal obligations I have placed myself under by signing the NDA. I believe I am doing so now, as are the other members of the CSM. If it turns out that I'm wrong, then I'll happily take my lumps.
Isnt this Politics 101 Trebor? As you soon as you get represented by the people, you are held accountable by the people. Thats just the way it works. Unfortunately for you and the rest of the CSM, you have to take the good with the bad, and us ulgly peeps  |

Azelor Delaria
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming The 0rphanage
16
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 12:33:00 -
[257] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Alas, damned if we do, damned if we don't.
If we say nothing, we get yelled at for being useless do-nothing morons.
No. If you "say nothing", people who give you a bit of credit assume you're doing what you were "elected" to do: represent us to CCP. For the most part, it's failtrolls trying to appear competent and important.
Admittedly, if you say nothing, there will always be people that think you're doing just that: nothing.
Quote:If we say what we feel comfortable saying (which is not much right now, alas), we get yelled at for being useless desperate attention whores.
When you sit there and make a new thread "every day" (using a bit of exaggeration here) saying, "We talked with a developer about some stuff, but we can't tell you what that stuff we talked about is because of the NDA", yes, you look like attention whores. I would rather some type of specific information rather than vague generalities. Most of us would
Quote:If we say too much, we compromise our ability to advocate on behalf of the community, because CCP will tell us less.
Then it's clear that CCP doesn't trust you, and you are nothing more than an attempt to keep subscriptions from dropping. How does it feel to be nothing but an unpaid poster child for CCP?
Quote:Bottom line, my policy is always to do what I think is in the best interests of the community, regardless of the personal consequences, subject to the legal obligations I have placed myself under by signing the NDA.
With the general level of intelligence (or lack there-of) coming from you guys lately with regards to this, I'm wondering when you intend to start thinking.
Quote:I believe I am doing so now, as are the other members of the CSM. If it turns out that I'm wrong, then I'll happily take my lumps.
No, you won't. You like the rest of the CSM will hide behind that NDA and say, "We couldn't tell you anything, it's all CCP's fault!" like the keyboard commandos you are. |

Large Collidable Object
morons. Interstellar Hobos
170
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 12:35:00 -
[258] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:
[...] morons. [...]useless desperate attention whores.[...]
I qualify for both - can I be CSM chairman? morons are recruiting. You know who you are! |

Officer Spawn
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 13:43:00 -
[259] - Quote
Since it's all NDA and we'll never know until after CCP and EVE are history we're all free to speculate. This is about resource allocation and there are three possibilities as I can think of:
-Arnar Says No ! He tells the CSM there will be no changes in CCP policy. This is kind of unlikely as the CSM is presenting this Skype talk like a Big Deal and even with all their love of trolling and attention prostitutionization they wouldn't have publicized the fact that they were told to take a hike.
-Arnar says Light At The End Of The Tunnel. "Other projects will soon enter a stage where less resources are required which will be allocated to EVE FiS". Of course nothing is certain and no firm dates are given and in a few months it may turn out that the other core projects got delayed and no extra resources are actually reassigned. This would be a typical CCP move, promise something in the future and make it seem like they are giving into CSM pressure.
-Arnar Surrender ! Release date on DUST and WoD are pushed back X months/years and resources are shifted to EVE. This would be a very valid use of the NDA as release dates are very important bits of information. But this would require some Icelandic alpha males to admit they were wrong which is extremely unlikely. |

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
8
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 13:47:00 -
[260] - Quote
NDA = Plausible Deniability.
The Mittani wrote:It's all good. Not only am I incredibly arrogant, but my power-base in nullsec is quite happy with the work we've done thus far; a few random tinfoilers on these forums (as opposed to kugu, where most null folks hang out) is no big deal. Your power-base is happy with just about anything, from dirty socks to banana peels .. isn't that what the whole Goon thing is about, going through life trolololol'ing? 
On a related note: MMORPG.com interview alluded to Tiericide being on the table for this Winter .. CSM/Dev care to comment?
|
|

Florestan Bronstein
United Engineering Services
39
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 13:54:00 -
[261] - Quote
Officer Spawn wrote:Since it's all NDA and we'll never know until after CCP and EVE are history we're all free to speculate. This is about resource allocation and there are three possibilities as I can think of:
-Arnar Says No ! He tells the CSM there will be no changes in CCP policy. This is kind of unlikely as the CSM is presenting this Skype talk like a Big Deal and even with all their love of trolling and attention prostitutionization they wouldn't have publicized the fact that they were told to take a hike.
-Arnar says Light At The End Of The Tunnel. "Other projects will soon enter a stage where less resources are required which will be allocated to EVE FiS". Of course nothing is certain and no firm dates are given and in a few months it may turn out that the other core projects got delayed and no extra resources are actually reassigned. This would be a typical CCP move, promise something in the future and make it seem like they are giving into CSM pressure.
-Arnar Surrender ! Release date on DUST and WoD are pushed back X months/years and resources are shifted to EVE. This would be a very valid use of the NDA as release dates are very important bits of information. But this would require some Icelandic alpha males to admit they were wrong which is extremely unlikely. you missed the most likely option:
-Arnar is the wrong person to talk to. Maybe he has free reign over EVE development but - at least judging from his job title - he simply does not have the power to reallocate resources from DUST, WoD or Carbon development to his own domain. |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
57
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 14:19:00 -
[262] - Quote
Well thanks for the update ; but wouldn"t it be better they fix the bugs that came with the latest patch I will rarely complain about the bugs that are ingame , but ever since the last patch it is a bum ......UUMM ridicelous
And those complaining about the NDA ..be glad it is there or do you really want mittani or what ever his ingame name is and his goons take over EVE
UMY i really despise those goons I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Pod Amarr
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 14:41:00 -
[263] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Neftaran wrote:I truly do not see why do you space politicians even bother posting this type of information. It's getting so repetitive and pointless. You wave your saber around to garner some attention.. CCP lets things gestate for a few days and then low and behold it's time for a meeting. You have your meeting then regurgitate the same responses we've been hearing for years. Few months from now we will get some more space drama and the never ending spin cycle of b.s. will start over again.
Player representation is nothing more than an illusion. Great, don't vote in CSM7, and I'll keep all this power and influence to myself. No big!
The only influence you have is how to setup your bots.
And yes I know who you are and not impressed at all.
CCP managed to **** off enough people by them self what are you going to do threaten that all goons leave I wish they did.
I actually hope that eve will go down to 13000 player count so CCP wakes up.
Money is only thing they look at and if you naively think you have any influence there well then you are really suffering from some illusion of greatness. |

Pod Amarr
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 14:45:00 -
[264] - Quote
Large Collidable Object wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:
[...] morons. [...]useless desperate attention whores.[...]
I qualify for both - can I be CSM chairman?
You got my vote IF only for the entertainment value.
|

Pod Amarr
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 14:50:00 -
[265] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:CCP Manifest, if i may be so bold... tl;dr, CCP is a business. And as far as businesses go, they number one business goal is to stay in business. That is best done by having great products people are wanting to buy
anyone else getting the feeling this is a troll by CCP AND the CSM? lol [/quote]
Agreed
The only reason CCP is still in business it created a cabal of Eve clinically addicted Junkies that will allow them to do anyhitng as long they get their fit.
Now that is a part of the time based skill progression If you have invested so much real time int your pilot you have much higher tolerance level then in the classic grind based games.
|

Marlakh
Knights of the Silver Dawn The Fourth District
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 14:50:00 -
[266] - Quote
Finer words were never laid to digital paper |

Pod Amarr
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 15:03:00 -
[267] - Quote
cyllan anassan wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Vicar2008 wrote:No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said. Check out the last Dev blogs, plenty of words, no real Comming up content with changes/number crunching etc. It's not a bone being thrown. Meetings like this one, when they reach their conclusion, take the form of a devblog and CSM posts. I believed it important for you to know that discussion is underway to address the problems, even if I can't disclose in what way yet. i never met a company that cant talk about improvements in their product. if anything when a company is improving the product they broadcast it to the seven winds. NDA? what is CCP doing, patenting a new lifeform? what a load of BS
In classic purchase based model it it common you do not want to announce new product too soon so they still buy the current one,
In the CCP subscription / Gold microtransaction hybrid whatever it is model the only thing I see it could hurt the if they announced that they are working on a super dooper DOUBLE ELITE EAGLE monocle. The sales of the current monocles would be hurt by that but the prescriptions should be in theory helped by advance info [if it is delivered upon]
|

PotatoOverdose
Royal Black Watch Highlanders Warped Aggression
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 15:53:00 -
[268] - Quote
I have a simple question. If the subject of the NDA'd meeting is something that the vast majority of players support, something that pertains to EVE aka FiS, and if that something is coming soon(tm) aka the winter "expansion", why doesn't CCP simply tell the community something along the following:
"Look, new spaceships content:
[Content]
We do good?"
In my humble opinion, if your consumer base is rioting and you have something they've been demanding ( for months ) that will appease them, then it might be a good idea to show them to get them to calm down, put the Molotov cocktails down, and chill out. Maybe.
Then again, I don't have much experience with PR matters, so maybe I'm completely wrong here. |

Ravcharas
GREY COUNCIL Nulli Secunda
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 16:35:00 -
[269] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:I have a simple question. If the subject of the NDA'd meeting is something that the vast majority of players support, something that pertains to EVE aka FiS, and if that something is coming soon(tm) aka the winter "expansion", why doesn't CCP simply tell the community something along the following:
"Look, new spaceships content:
[Content]
We do good?"
In my humble opinion, if your consumer base is rioting and you have something they've been demanding ( for months ) that will appease them, then it might be a good idea to show them to get them to calm down, put the Molotov cocktails down, and chill out. Maybe.
Then again, I don't have much experience with PR matters, so maybe I'm completely wrong here. If I had to speculate I would say it's because Zulupark knows that the resources allocated isn't enough to do anything substantial to change the direction FiS is heading. So right now he's talking to the people holding the checkbook and using the CSM approval as leverage to lobby for more resources. |

mkint
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 17:46:00 -
[270] - Quote
pussnheels wrote:Well thanks for the update ; but wouldn"t it be better they fix the bugs that came with the latest patch I will rarely complain about the bugs that are ingame , but ever since the last patch it is a bum ......UUMM ridicelous
And those complaining about the NDA ..be glad it is there or do you really want mittani or what ever his ingame name is and his goons take over EVE
UMY i really despise those goons
Lol, mittens is a turd burgler. What makes you think he hasn't already told large swathes of the goons? He likes to **** off in front of whoever he can, except maybe a mirror (would be a sad sad day if he actually saw himself.) Besides, the number one priority of most of the CSM is to perpetuate their RMT empires. How do you think Mittens can afford to be "retired"? Because his years (or should that be singular?) of experience as a well established lawyer? At age 25ish? Like hell.
Oh, and Hilmar still needs to be fired. G*d f*cking d*mn, that guy sucks. |
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
50
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 18:11:00 -
[271] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:It's also funny that there are idiots who think that the CSM has any choice as to what is NDA'd and what isn't; if it was up to us, we'd tell you what the meeting was about. But in this case it's Zulu's decision. vOv This is as obnoxious as it is arrogant.
If you can't see the need to keep significant game changes under wraps so everyone has an equal shot at making the best of them, than you are a fool.
I happen to think you know better, and that this statement is BS just to placate players.
Way to kick a necessary but unpopular measure exclusively into CCP's court.
Your either a little kid or a liar... maybe both. In any event, statements like yours severely undermine the credibility of the CSM. ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

Pax Infinitas
Adamant Heavy Manufacturing
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 18:14:00 -
[272] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:MailDeadDrop wrote:And here is where I must turn the lash on the CSM. They should've kept their mouths shut until after the next meeting at a minimum. I fail to see any positive impact for the playerbase by their posting. As best as I can tell, all they've accomplished is to create a platform for their own unseemly self-aggrandizement. I expect better of them. Alas, damned if we do, damned if we don't. If we say nothing, we get yelled at for being useless do-nothing morons. If we say what we feel comfortable saying (which is not much right now, alas), we get yelled at for being useless desperate attention whores. If we say too much, we compromise our ability to advocate on behalf of the community, because CCP will tell us less. Bottom line, my policy is always to do what I think is in the best interests of the community, regardless of the personal consequences, subject to the legal obligations I have placed myself under by signing the NDA. I believe I am doing so now, as are the other members of the CSM. If it turns out that I'm wrong, then I'll happily take my lumps.
No, it's "damned if you communicate in a ****-poor manner and damned if you don't communicate at all."
Do you honestly think an update of, "We talked, can't say anything. We'll try and talk at some point in the future and at some point let you know," is an any way an acceptable communication? Especially in light of the fact that it took almost 3 ******* months to get minutes out of the emergency summit?
I understand that you are hamstrung by the NDA. I further understand that CCP is hard to negotiate with. I also understand that CCP is epic in dragging its feet in ways that would make most government bureaucracy stare in awe. I get it, I really do.
Here is the reality: You had a meeting that in some way ended up becoming a meeting to plan a meeting. I've sat through dozens of those this year. I know nothing of substance gets settled in those meetings. I know it can be detrimental to discuss the substance of said meetings with larger audiences before anything has been settled. But to come out of such a meeting without a decent roadmap regarding how you're going to proceed? That's kind of the point of the meeting!
Here's how the announcement should have been written:
FakeAnnouncement wrote:Hey guys, just wanted to give you a heads-up that we had a meeting with Zulu last night about all of the controversy lately. I can't go into specifics of the meeting but here's what you can expect over the next few weeks. Next week we'll be meeting with the appropriate stakeholders at CCP regarding their commitment to FiS content. We hope to get the major issues settled in that meeting. Assuming we do, Zulu's going to hit you with a devblog by the end of the following week. If we don't get the major issues resolved, I'll give you a further update to let you know when you can expect to hear something more substantive. As these issues relate to CCP's corporate strategy, there won't be minutes from either meeting. In the end, regardless of how everything is settled, we'll be able to give you a concrete answer about CCP's commitment to EVE and FiS within the next few weeks. It may not be the answer everyone is looking for, but we'll have an answer one way or another.
If you have any questions I'll try to answer them as best as I can, but again this is CCP's confidental corporate strategy stuff and I probably won't be able to give you the answer you want yet.
Do you understand the difference between the CSM's announcement and what I wrote above? One contains a commitment to future action and communication as well as a reasonable timeline for it. It also commits to attempting to answer questions in the interim while giving fair warning that some questions can't be answered. The other does neither of those.
If the CSM can't get CCP to agree to and commit to something like what was written above then either the CSM in its current incarnation has failed or the CSM as a concept has failed.
And finally, YES, you absolutely should keep quiet if you can't provide something like what is written above. To corrupt a quote from a great US President and politician (kinda like you guys are EVE politicians) and apply it to the current situation, "It is better to remain silent and be thought useless than to speak out and remove all doubt."
/rage |

Zirise
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
50
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 18:28:00 -
[273] - Quote
Your concerns are pretty funny; The Mittani will most likely be elected for CSM 7 if he runs, I think most people find he's doing an awesome job at holding CCP's feet to the fire.
But carry on failing at waging political forum wars making yourself look bad, its fun to watch.  |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
50
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 18:53:00 -
[274] - Quote
Zirise wrote:Your concerns are pretty funny; The Mittani will most likely be elected for CSM 7 if he runs, I think most people find he's doing an awesome job at holding CCP's feet to the fire. But carry on failing at waging political forum wars making yourself look bad, its fun to watch.  I don't care how I "look". I just want to see EvE get better.
In my mind a good CSM representative has the mind of a software engineer and the heart of a sci-fi dreamer. Mitt seems to simply be an alliance type that could generate a lot of thoughtless support. I have no doubt he'll be re-elected, should he be inclined to run again. ...but if you are unable to 'step out of your pod' to discuss game design I think you're going to be pretty inefficient in generating constructive action. I think the failure to differentiate what makes a good alliance head in-game and what makes a great game designer is problematic, and my opinion of the mit quote above reflects that. There's no political motivation here. I have never really cared about 'game politics'... it's not my game.
If Mit even reads it I would hope he would reflect on it... because he is in a position to effect positive change. I'm not looking for a response... just consideration. However, I suspect he'll just react if anything at all.... but that is a rough call since all I know about him is what he's written about the CSM. Roll playing is for in-game. I think the CSM would do well to keep RP there... It's an observation. My 2 isk. ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
50
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 19:05:00 -
[275] - Quote
Double post - plz remove ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
157
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 20:04:00 -
[276] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:MailDeadDrop wrote:And here is where I must turn the lash on the CSM. They should've kept their mouths shut until after the next meeting at a minimum. I fail to see any positive impact for the playerbase by their posting. As best as I can tell, all they've accomplished is to create a platform for their own unseemly self-aggrandizement. I expect better of them. Alas, damned if we do, damned if we don't. If we say nothing, we get yelled at for being useless do-nothing morons. If we say what we feel comfortable saying (which is not much right now, alas), we get yelled at for being useless desperate attention whores. If we say too much, we compromise our ability to advocate on behalf of the community, because CCP will tell us less. Bottom line, my policy is always to do what I think is in the best interests of the community, regardless of the personal consequences, subject to the legal obligations I have placed myself under by signing the NDA. I believe I am doing so now, as are the other members of the CSM. If it turns out that I'm wrong, then I'll happily take my lumps.
This is indeed a thorny political - and indeed philosophical problem
My advice would be to resolve the trilemma by always following my advice. Luckily, this is to give us as much information as you can at each discreet stage of the process. I say "luckily" because this is exactly what you have done here.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal made on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
157
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 20:05:00 -
[277] - Quote
EDIT: Well I see one much valued feature from the old EVE forums was carried over at least.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal made on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. |

Maimakterion
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 20:52:00 -
[278] - Quote
Gogela wrote: In my mind a good CSM representative has the mind of a software engineer and the heart of a sci-fi dreamer. Mitt seems to simply be an alliance type that could generate a lot of thoughtless support.
What are you smoking? Why would a CSM rep need either one of those when their job is to bring their constituent's concerns up to CCP?
Gogela wrote: I think the failure to differentiate what makes a good alliance head in-game and what makes a great game designer is problematic
When did you get it in your head that The Mittani is in charge of EVE's developers? At this point I'm going to go with you're making stuff up as you go.
Gogela wrote:Roll playing is for in-game. I think the CSM would do well to keep RP there... It's an observation. My 2 isk.
If you think Goons are roleplaying, you are beyond help. Please go back to camping your lowsec gate and never post again. |

BuckStrider
Nano-Tech Experiments
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 20:56:00 -
[279] - Quote
Zirise wrote:Your concerns are pretty funny; The Mittani will most likely be elected for CSM 7 if he runs, I think most people find he's doing an awesome job at holding CCP's feet to the fire. But carry on failing at waging political forum wars making yourself look bad, its fun to watch. 
Spoken like a true Goon pet!
Yes, it would be SOOOOOOO difficult for Mittens to get another few thousand votes 
So who is TEST putting up since White Tree went to another Goon pet alliance?...Or should I say started a new Goon pet alliance
|

Zensige
0ne Percent.
50
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 21:01:00 -
[280] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online) and, despite Gridlock and Team BFF's efforts, general stagnation when it comes to fixes and improvements, the CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6
Don't bother posting until you have something worth while to read, IE non-NDA.
|
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
51
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 21:12:00 -
[281] - Quote
Maimakterion wrote:What are you smoking? Why would a CSM rep need either one of those when their job is to bring their constituent's concerns up to CCP? ...* ...um ...because video games are programmed in real life, not a fictional game universe? How do YOU think games come into being? Real life game design requires real-world programming talent and abstract vision. If you want real world results for a fictional universe, your need some real life skills... pretend internet spaceship skills are not enough.
Maimakterion wrote:When did you get it in your head that The Mittani is in charge of EVE's developers? At this point I'm going to go with you're making stuff up as you go. ...in charge? Bit of a stretch don't you think... I think you are making up stuff now. I never suggested any such thing. I merely stated he has influence... which he does.
Maimakterion wrote:If you think Goons are roleplaying, you are beyond help. Please go back to camping your lowsec gate and never post again. There's roll-playing in terms of Amarr vs Minmatar, which some people do, and there's roll-playing in terms of "I'm in a spaceship... in space... doing stuff..." which is what the rest do. You are roll-playing if you play EvE, one way or another. I think you have spent so much time in your "spaceship" that you can't even see that... thus illustrating the point of my entire argument. Thanks for clarifying things...
Welp... back to my lowsec camp.  ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

Saerathus
Vocatio Ad Virtutem
79
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 01:57:00 -
[282] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online) and, despite Gridlock and Team BFF's efforts, general stagnation when it comes to fixes and improvements, the CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6
"Council Representatives will communicate with the voting community through the topic forums mentioned above, but also with individuals as necessary through any means they agree upon. Although private communications between Representatives and voters can be kept confidential, transcripts of all CSM meetings are considered public property and are to be made public."
http://www.eveonline.com/download/devblog/CSM.pdf |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
50
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 02:03:00 -
[283] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:
useless do-nothing morons.
useless desperate attention whores.
right on two counts
lol hilmar must be kicking himself for that email by now - if he cares which is 50/50 in my book - Why dont they just NDA the entire staff so if something like that happens again they can find them and legally prosecute them rather than just firing them - or in the case of the previous leaks - not caring They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
50
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 02:45:00 -
[284] - Quote
Pod Amarr wrote:
CCP managed to **** off enough people by them self what are you going to do threaten that all goons leave I wish they did.
I actually hope that eve will go down to 13000 player count so CCP wakes up.
I think if the goons left it would O.o
They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |

Richard Aiel
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 02:51:00 -
[285] - Quote
Quote:Wily Mittani answered Hilmar, all untroubled.
"Remember my repute among thy customer base. I have the ear of many; yea even my enemies listen to my counsel. So too the gaming magazines, who hunger ever for the content of discord, give me heed. Bend not, and I shall bring down 'pon you a great storm of rage-quitting. I shall tell stories to the media that will hearten your enemies and make your investors quail. Then shall the very stars of New Eden flicker and go dark, and with them all your ill-starred designs."
"Nay," quoth Hilmar. "If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave. Thus unvexed, I shall have Microtransactions and the storied wealth they bestow. Yea, even unto golden ammunition should I desire it. Then I shall no longer be hostage to those who tithe but a monthly pittance, yet seek to make themselves my master."
At this, Mittani did but smile and turn to leave.
"You have no power or desire to lay New Eden low," unbending Hilmar called after him. "And even didst thou, it is the stage 'pon which your own reputation struts. Turn off New Eden's lights and you likewise stand in darkness. Where, Mittani, would you go, New Eden having fallen?"
The Mittani paused, and turning unto Hilmar spoke thusly:
"There are other worlds than thine. If New Eden falls, I will lead my minions forth and play at World of Tanks."
"Tanks?" cried proud Hilmar, "Tanks?!"
The assembled host bowed and answered him as one.
"You are welcome, Hilmar."
lol how true
Goons really dont NEED this game. CCP really does NEED this game. Goons are apparently in control of the only player-to-CCP communication CCP actually cares to recieve. this seems bad to me "If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave." Quoth the Hillmar |

Flamespar
Woof Club
26
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 03:01:00 -
[286] - Quote
One point that is consistently ignored by the players screaming "Waaaah CCP is ignoring EVE for WoD and Dust514" is that CCP is developing core techonologies that will benefit all three games.
EVE may benefit from WoDs combat system, WoD will benefit from EVEs network optimisations, Dust514 might share art assets with EVE.
Yes Incarna didn't deliver on it's promise in it's first iteration, but it will. Hopefully sooner rather than later. I would hate to see the development of this feature that some of us have been waiting for years (and years) to halt.
Personally I think CCP is still commited to their vision of a complete SciFi simulator. I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
138
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 03:14:00 -
[287] - Quote
Saerathus wrote:"Council Representatives will communicate with the voting community through the topic forums mentioned above, but also with individuals as necessary through any means they agree upon. Although private communications between Representatives and voters can be kept confidential, transcripts of all CSM meetings are considered public property and are to be made public." http://www.eveonline.com/download/devblog/CSM.pdf
Sorry, but this wasn't a CSM meeting. There was no transcript. Perhaps you might quote the portion of that document where it talks about communications between the CSM and CCP and the NDA. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Trolls Troll
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 03:18:00 -
[288] - Quote
Two step wrote:CSM and CCP and the NDA.
THAT word again.
|

ThisIsntMyMain
Republic University Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 03:23:00 -
[289] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
Stuff
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6
To get back to the OP, and putting aside most of the tinfoil rubbish and asshat posting by 13 year old kids in this thread ....
Thanks to all the members of the CSM for doing what the CSM is supposed to do and ensuring that player sentiment gets communicated to CCP Senior management. Whatever the end results turn out to be it's clear that the CSM mechanism at least is working here in a way that doesn't happen with any other video game company. Fingers crossed that it gets a result that keeps customers happy and CCP in business.
|

Vaako Horizon
Casual Slackers Daily Operations
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 04:02:00 -
[290] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Vicar2008 wrote:No offense I like where this is going, but its just another bone being thrown to us without actually anything concrete being said. Check out the last Dev blogs, plenty of words, no real Comming up content with changes/number crunching etc. It's not a bone being thrown. Meetings like this one, when they reach their conclusion, take the form of a devblog and CSM posts. I believed it important for you to know that discussion is underway to address the problems, even if I can't disclose in what way yet.
This was a bone... instead of this crap you guys should have been silent... Reason? well, this bone will now make us long for something again which if it ever happens ( as it feels atm not ever ) its gonna be a long long time until we see it. |
|

Vaako Horizon
Casual Slackers Daily Operations
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 04:24:00 -
[291] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:MailDeadDrop wrote:So far we have Meissa, Mittani, Two Step, and a few other CSM delegates (sorry -- can't be bothered to gather all the names) claiming to have had a meeting with one CCP manager, and claiming that good stuff was talked about, and claiming that we'll hear about it, eventually, maybe. 138 posts and 7+ hours later, and not a single CCP person has chimed to confirm even the most basic of facts; like even the meeting occurred, much less that anything substantial was discussed or that anything will be the result of it or even the vaguest of indications when. I predict that none will be forthcoming in the next several days either, seeing as CCP is incapable of staffing for the weekend.
Face it CSM: CCP has absolutely no respect for you, and by extension no respect for the players. They're just trolling you. Quelle surprise
MDD This is a very fair point. Thanks for bringing it up. I'd been talking to the CSM about something entirely unrelated a day or two before, but since I already knew what the content of yesterday's dialogue was going to be, I requested to be a part of the meeting as a fly on the wall. CCP Xhagen graciously accepted my request. Obviously, since I am also under NDA as an employee (and since I'm part of the evil team of the one single guy in public relations that pursues press opportunities) I too cannot reveal the main bulk of the conversation. Sorry dads I am disappoint. However, for what it's worth, as an EVE player I can say that I am wet-my-pants-silly-happy about where the meeting content is headed. Yes, this was a preliminary meeting, but it was absolutely positively necessarily so. That does put the CSM temporarily in a bit of a tough spot, but eh, they were elected to be in that tough spot and kinda campaigned to be there. I'll get it out of the way here. This meeting was not about ponies. Sorry guys. One of my main takeaways from the meeting (and my dealings with them separate from the meeting) is that the CSM will not be distracted from their stated mission. Their tactical use of a mini-PR campaign is a testament to that. Their immediate first responses to stuff Zulu had to say also speaks volumes to their undeterrability. They haven't "called a truce" or been sated.. yet. See Mittani's Red Meat comments in this thread. Their questions were myriad and delivered stalwartly. Also, they haven't been threatened with the NDA wagged in front of their faces. They have stood quite firm in their priorities--and are very much of the mind of many of you that it's going to be "watch what we do" . They are right in saying that nothing of detailed substance was said during the meeting--however there was apparently enough vague substance to convince them that the next meeting should be promising indeed. Convinced enough to decide to come to you guys and give a progress report, treading dangeous political waters. If the preliminary meeting didn't smell of enough Red Meat, I severely doubt they would be here at all. We didn't try to convince them to speak to you guys. Hope that addresses some of the meta-comments here about the CSM's behavior/communications. Sorry about the delay in coming here. I had to sleep.
This adds some + to CSM this one time, havent seen them do anything do award anymore but - before. This also adds + to CCP from a massive amount of - covering a long time.
Instead of the silence we've had keep these coming so that we can see CCP is alive, other then zym who edits everyones posts. Also, try and actually add some real info every now and then, the lack of info is getting tiresome.... |

Dalketh
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 04:29:00 -
[292] - Quote
Vaako Horizon wrote:
This was a bone... instead of this crap you guys should have been silent... Reason? well, this bone will now make us long for something again which if it ever happens ( as it feels atm not ever ) its gonna be a long long time until we see it.
THIS EXACTLY. CCP messes up - CSM supposedly to the rescue - CSM satisfied with CCP saying/promising blah blah blah... we wait... and nothing.... CSM angry... summits... emergency meetings... CSM say wait they are optimistic... then NOTHING.... CSM gets up in arms... we supposed to pay attention yet again... then CSM pleased... then NOTHING... over and over. Year after year. 'This time will be different'... don't you understand you are wearing us out? If you can't make a difference... quit. If you can... we haven't really seen it and are tired. Mitten's profanity filled speeches and Trebor's damage control not withstanding... we are feeling hopeless imo.... thats what I see. FYI a nullsec boost (since the current CSM so null-sec heavy) isn't going to cut it if that is current thought.
|

Richard Aiel
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 04:56:00 -
[293] - Quote
Vaako Horizon wrote:
This adds some + to CSM this one time, havent seen them do anything do award anymore but - before. This also adds + to CCP from a massive amount of - covering a long time.
Instead of the silence we've had keep these coming so that we can see CCP is alive, other then zym who edits everyones posts. Also, try and actually add some real info every now and then, the lack of info is getting tiresome....
Video of the latest CSM meeting
"If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave." Quoth the Hillmar |

Saerathus
Vocatio Ad Virtutem
79
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 04:58:00 -
[294] - Quote
Saerathus wrote:"Council Representatives will communicate with the voting community through the topic forums mentioned above, but also with individuals as necessary through any means they agree upon. Although private communications between Representatives and voters can be kept confidential, transcripts of all CSM meetings are considered public property and are to be made public." http://www.eveonline.com/download/devblog/CSM.pdf
Two step wrote: Sorry, but this wasn't a CSM meeting.
Meissa Anunthiel wrote: the CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
Meissa Anunthiel wrote: During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them.
Meissa Anunthiel wrote: We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd
Because you are too lazy to back up what you say with your own citations..
"CSM representatives and alternates must sign a non-disclosure agreement, as all volunteers and affiliates are required to since the proximity of their relationship may expose them to information not intended for public release. Council representatives and alternates are bound by the terms of that agreement, as all other participants are."
Has nothing to do with meetings. The document enumerates exactly how many meetings the CSM is supposed to have with CCP each term, how many members of the CSM are required to make a meeting official, having the contents of the meetings determined beforehand.. and so on. Most specifically though is the fact that every CSM-CCP meeting is supposed to have a public transcript. Not notes, not minutes - a transcript. So when someone says "The CSM just met with.." I assume that is a meeting of the CSM.. this isn't a matter of bloody semantics. I don't blame the CSM necessarily for not publishing them because it's obvious that CCP has been putting undue pressure on that whole subject, but don't sit there and say "Sorry, you're wrong." when pointed out that there's a contradiction to the much-touted document that the CSM was founded on.
NDAs are signed not only by you but everyone in the ISD programme (supposedly?) and all third-parties that come into contact with Eve-O. Fair enough. But the CSM should not be having NDA'd meetings outside of its scope. Otherwise, why even bother to pretend that it's a "democratic representation"? |

Saerathus
Vocatio Ad Virtutem
79
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 05:04:00 -
[295] - Quote
I fell for this. :( |

Richard Aiel
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 05:08:00 -
[296] - Quote
I havent seen someone do it for years so bwa ha haaa "If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave." Quoth the Hillmar |

Barricade Dark
28
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 08:37:00 -
[297] - Quote
I have to agree with Saerathus on this one, well put by the way. This whole thing just stinks of semantics and cover up. I mean I'm glad to see they are actually having meetings and making some kind of headway with CCP. I always figuired whatever the result would be it definitly would be rolled out slowly over the course of months, while in the meantime CCP would continue with whatever plan they have for the immediate future. I don't see them suggesting that they are suddenly going to drop what they are doing as a company and turn around in response to the CSM and their meeting and start working on the game in the direction the CSM and community would like to see. But rather it would be a statement which basically amounts to "we are going to start looking at this".. which is exactly all that has happened. A commitment to "look at it".
Hardly comferting and certainly not sufficient but at least its an acknolwedgment that their is a problem.
I think the response from CCP should be considerably stronger. It should be a commitment to "immediatly restructure the course of Eve Online to meet the demands of the community".. Period. Anything short of that is a weak response and will (and IS) seen as a weak response.
It will be interesting to see how quickly and how deep they will go into the proposed issues, at this point it doesn't really matter what they attack first as far as FIS is concerned, you could throw darts at a board with the hundreds of problems and just work from their. It would be great if they just started on something.. anything.. at this point. I hope CCP realizes that their next patch better include some actual results from these meetings... actual implemented action. |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
179
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 08:52:00 -
[298] - Quote
Barricade Dark wrote:I have to agree with Saerathus on this one, well put by the way. This whole thing just stinks of semantics and cover up. I mean I'm glad to see they are actually having meetings and making some kind of headway with CCP. I always figuired whatever the result would be it definitly would be rolled out slowly over the course of months, while in the meantime CCP would continue with whatever plan they have for the immediate future. I don't see them suggesting that they are suddenly going to drop what they are doing as a company and turn around in response to the CSM and their meeting and start working on the game in the direction the CSM and community would like to see. But rather it would be a statement which basically amounts to "we are going to start looking at this".. which is exactly all that has happened. A commitment to "look at it".
Hardly comferting and certainly not sufficient but at least its an acknolwedgment that their is a problem.
I think the response from CCP should be considerably stronger. It should be a commitment to "immediatly restructure the course of Eve Online to meet the demands of the community".. Period. Anything short of that is a weak response and will (and IS) seen as a weak response.
It will be interesting to see how quickly and how deep they will go into the proposed issues, at this point it doesn't really matter what they attack first as far as FIS is concerned, you could throw darts at a board with the hundreds of problems and just work from their. It would be great if they just started on something.. anything.. at this point. I hope CCP realizes that their next patch better include some actual results from these meetings... actual implemented action.
I'm informing you of a process in place, not of CCP saying "we'll look at it somewhere down the line". One process that should generate progress or at least an answer because they're looking at it now...
Before you decry the results of that process to be meaningless, why don't you wait for the result to come out?
Whether that process produces the necessary outcome or not, I'll be posting here again to tell you what came of it anyway. The good thing is that there's *something* going on.
As soon as there's developments, there will be an update. In the meantime I'm reading this thread and others to make sure I get your collective opinion to relay it to CCP for the next meeting.
Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Flamespar
Woof Club
26
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 09:19:00 -
[299] - Quote
After listening to all the raging on these forums I am of the opinion that what Hilmar should have said in his email was
"We will watch what the silent majority does rather than listen to the vocal minority." I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |

Barricade Dark
28
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 09:39:00 -
[300] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Barricade Dark wrote:I have to agree with Saerathus on this one, well put by the way. This whole thing just stinks of semantics and cover up. I mean I'm glad to see they are actually having meetings and making some kind of headway with CCP. I always figuired whatever the result would be it definitly would be rolled out slowly over the course of months, while in the meantime CCP would continue with whatever plan they have for the immediate future. I don't see them suggesting that they are suddenly going to drop what they are doing as a company and turn around in response to the CSM and their meeting and start working on the game in the direction the CSM and community would like to see. But rather it would be a statement which basically amounts to "we are going to start looking at this".. which is exactly all that has happened. A commitment to "look at it".
Hardly comferting and certainly not sufficient but at least its an acknolwedgment that their is a problem.
I think the response from CCP should be considerably stronger. It should be a commitment to "immediatly restructure the course of Eve Online to meet the demands of the community".. Period. Anything short of that is a weak response and will (and IS) seen as a weak response.
It will be interesting to see how quickly and how deep they will go into the proposed issues, at this point it doesn't really matter what they attack first as far as FIS is concerned, you could throw darts at a board with the hundreds of problems and just work from their. It would be great if they just started on something.. anything.. at this point. I hope CCP realizes that their next patch better include some actual results from these meetings... actual implemented action. I'm informing you of a process in place, not of CCP saying "we'll look at it somewhere down the line". One process that should generate progress or at least an answer because they're looking at it now... Before you decry the results of that process to be meaningless, why don't you wait for the result to come out? Whether that process produces the necessary outcome or not, I'll be posting here again to tell you what came of it anyway. The good thing is that there's *something* going on. As soon as there's developments, there will be an update. In the meantime I'm reading this thread and others to make sure I get your collective opinion to relay it to CCP for the next meeting.
Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.
It would be one thing if CCP had a reputation worthy of our faith, but they don't, so while I don't decree that the processes is meaningless, I do decree that I have no faith in the process because that is the reputation that CCP has created for themselves. You are right, at this moment nothing has happened but conversations, but given that we have had many meaningless conversations with CCP in the past that resulted in no action at all, how else do you expect the community to react? |
|

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
182
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 09:55:00 -
[301] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:After listening to all the raging on these forums I am of the opinion that what Hilmar should have said in his email was
"We will watch what the silent majority does rather than listen to the vocal minority."
That they did... Subs took a hit, overall in-game activity took a hit, etc. It's a shame CCP has not yet learned to listen to what we say to an extent that would be beneficial.
Don't underestimate the indirect influence of that vocal minority.
It's pretty sad that this scheme repeats itself: - We tell them "don't do this, or this bad thing will happen" - They do it anyway - Aforementionned bad thing happens - They come back and solve the situation the way we told them they should have. - We can do nothing but once more throw our hands in the sky, look smug and say "told you"...
That scheme stopped repeating itself for "micro" things (feature details) somewhere during CSM 3, now let's hope they evolve the same way for macro things.
Doesn't mean they have to agree to everything, just take our informed opinion into consideration. Sometimes unpopular decisions are necessary (speed nerf was unpopular but necessary, same with falcon/ECM), but for those they usually have the approval of the level-headed CSM members... Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
165
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 09:58:00 -
[302] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Sometimes unpopular decisions are necessary (speed nerf was unpopular but necessary, same with falcon/ECM), but for those they usually have the approval of the level-headed CSM members...
Speaking of which, the supercap nerf is going to deliver some quality drama.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal made on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. |

Gregor Palter
15
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 10:06:00 -
[303] - Quote
People seem to have this mistaken idea that just because a small percentage of a whole player base posts on forums that this somehow means that it's only those who have issues, the whole vocal minority <> silent majority bit. It's ofcourse logical to state that not being happy will influence one's eagerness to post about it but again; that does not mean the ones you don't hear might not have issues, problems or annoyances, they just don't give two ***** about typing words on some forum. |

Vicar2008
Royal Black Watch Highlanders Warped Aggression
22
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 10:08:00 -
[304] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Barricade Dark wrote:I have to agree with Saerathus on this one, well put by the way. This whole thing just stinks of semantics and cover up. I mean I'm glad to see they are actually having meetings and making some kind of headway with CCP. I always figuired whatever the result would be it definitly would be rolled out slowly over the course of months, while in the meantime CCP would continue with whatever plan they have for the immediate future. I don't see them suggesting that they are suddenly going to drop what they are doing as a company and turn around in response to the CSM and their meeting and start working on the game in the direction the CSM and community would like to see. But rather it would be a statement which basically amounts to "we are going to start looking at this".. which is exactly all that has happened. A commitment to "look at it".
Hardly comferting and certainly not sufficient but at least its an acknolwedgment that their is a problem.
I think the response from CCP should be considerably stronger. It should be a commitment to "immediatly restructure the course of Eve Online to meet the demands of the community".. Period. Anything short of that is a weak response and will (and IS) seen as a weak response.
It will be interesting to see how quickly and how deep they will go into the proposed issues, at this point it doesn't really matter what they attack first as far as FIS is concerned, you could throw darts at a board with the hundreds of problems and just work from their. It would be great if they just started on something.. anything.. at this point. I hope CCP realizes that their next patch better include some actual results from these meetings... actual implemented action. I'm informing you of a process in place, not of CCP saying "we'll look at it somewhere down the line". One process that should generate progress or at least an answer because they're looking at it now... Before you decry the results of that process to be meaningless, why don't you wait for the result to come out? Whether that process produces the necessary outcome or not, I'll be posting here again to tell you what came of it anyway. The good thing is that there's *something* going on. As soon as there's developments, there will be an update. In the meantime I'm reading this thread and others to make sure I get your collective opinion to relay it to CCP for the next meeting.
I think the collective opinion is pretty much, give us some cold hard facts and figures for whats going to be in the expansion. Doesnt matter if we like what we see or not. Supercap nerf, will be awesome for most, make the Supercap pilots cry, etc etc. Half hearted non space welp expansions from CCP aint cutting the mustard anymore, we know it, why the hell are CCP not acknowleding it? |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
182
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 10:18:00 -
[305] - Quote
Vicar2008 wrote:
I think the collective opinion is pretty much, give us some cold hard facts and figures for whats going to be in the expansion. Doesnt matter if we like what we see or not. Supercap nerf, will be awesome for most, make the Supercap pilots cry, etc etc. Half hearted non space welp expansions from CCP aint cutting the mustard anymore, we know it, why the hell are CCP not acknowleding it?
I'll give them to you when I can, but if I can't give you the substance because actual content of an expansion doesn't get published ahead of time to account for inevitable manipulations based on its outcome, or expectation management (a portion of what is planned doesn't make it in, that's the case each time), then I'll at least tell you how happy (or unhappy) I am about the whole thing.
The last plan I've seen, I was very unhappy with the amount of resources allocated to Flying in space as opposed to space dollies and other stuff I didn't care much about, but I was quite happy with what was being done with the resources available. Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Barricade Dark
33
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 10:20:00 -
[306] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Flamespar wrote:After listening to all the raging on these forums I am of the opinion that what Hilmar should have said in his email was
"We will watch what the silent majority does rather than listen to the vocal minority." That they did... Subs took a hit, overall in-game activity took a hit, etc. It's a shame CCP has not yet learned to listen to what we say to an extent that would be beneficial. Don't underestimate the indirect influence of that vocal minority. It's pretty sad that this scheme repeats itself: - We tell them "don't do this, or this bad thing will happen" - They do it anyway - Aforementionned bad thing happens - They come back and solve the situation the way we told them they should have. - We can do nothing but once more throw our hands in the sky, look smug and say "told you"... That scheme stopped repeating itself for "micro" things (feature details) somewhere during CSM 3, now let's hope they evolve the same way for macro things. Doesn't mean they have to agree to everything, just take our informed opinion into consideration. Sometimes unpopular decisions are necessary (speed nerf was unpopular but necessary, same with falcon/ECM), but for those they usually have the approval of the level-headed CSM members...
The thing about the vocal minority compared to the silent majority is that the vocal majority speak out to reflect what might happen based on plans and intent, the silent majority simply react to it by canceling subscription. In terms of opinions about the aformentioned changes the community while not in sync at all times general responds to it the same, its just some are vocal on the forums while others simply cancel their accounts and move on. |

BugraT WarheaD
Astromechanica Federatis
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 10:38:00 -
[307] - Quote
Good work CSM people, i haven't read all the topic, but as far as i can see, communication of your CSM is the best i've seen since i played Eve. I really hope that people will wait 'till next patchs to see where we are really going before whinning.
As far as i'm concerned, despite of all the lack of love we've seen recently, Eve stay the best of all MMO game |

Rainus Max
Fusion Enterprises Ltd Morsus Mihi
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 10:58:00 -
[308] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:[quote=Vicar2008] The last plan I've seen, I was very unhappy with the amount of resources allocated to Flying in space as opposed to space dollies and other stuff I didn't care much about, but I was quite happy with what was being done with the resources available.
Its good to see that something is coming out of all this, I think I could accept a resonable amount of resources on WiS to get the other CQs out and the establishments.
I get the awful feeling that it will just end up being a constant resource drain on the rest of the game as rooms and new underwear get introduced and it will never reach a point where CCP can walk away for a year or two and concentrate on the other aspects of the game.
I'd love CCP to get the other CQs and the establishments out and then drop all the teams (appart from say one 'dressmaker/WiS' team) back onto FiS and knock out decent patches and fixes faster than a woodpecker on drugs. |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
182
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 11:10:00 -
[309] - Quote
Rainus Max wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:[quote=Vicar2008] The last plan I've seen, I was very unhappy with the amount of resources allocated to Flying in space as opposed to space dollies and other stuff I didn't care much about, but I was quite happy with what was being done with the resources available. Its good to see that something is coming out of all this, I think I could accept a resonable amount of resources on WiS to get the other CQs out and the establishments. I get the awful feeling that it will just end up being a constant resource drain on the rest of the game as rooms and new underwear get introduced and it will never reach a point where CCP can walk away for a year or two and concentrate on the other aspects of the game. I'd love CCP to get the other CQs and the establishments out and then drop all the teams (appart from say one 'dressmaker/WiS' team) back onto FiS and knock out decent patches and fixes faster than a woodpecker on drugs.
"reasonable" is the key indeed. However for the past 12 months the amount hasn't been what I'd call reasonable. CSM 5 warned CCP such a plan would be "poorly received", to no avail.
A small caveat on the "resource drain". If one has to argue, one has to argue for the right reasons. As far as I understand it, clothes are not a resource drain on Eve, they are designed by someone hired to do just that, clothes, as it is their professional expertise. One could argue that a game designer or programmer could have been hired instead, but that's missing the point since that clothes person would also be required for another CCP project (WoD). So, resource drain from CQ, establishment, character animations, etc. I agree with, clothes I'm not so sure. Plus frankly that person is doing a good job. I'm sad the same can't be said of the (imo) idiots in charge of pricing strategy but that's a separate issue. Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

BugraT WarheaD
Astromechanica Federatis
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 11:17:00 -
[310] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Plus frankly that person is doing a good job. I'm sad the same can't be said of the (imo) idiots in charge of pricing strategy but that's a separate issue. I totally agree with this. Why a so idiot pricing strategy ... If Nex prices were divided by 10, i'm sure there's a lot of people to buy stuff from that shop  |
|

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
43
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 11:17:00 -
[311] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:I'm sad the same can't be said of the idiots in charge
FYP |

Xtraneous
Sam's Space Guys
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 12:56:00 -
[312] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:
That they did... Subs took a hit, overall in-game activity took a hit, etc. It's a shame CCP has not yet learned to listen to what we say to an extent that would be beneficial.
I've been curious about this since it was mentioned the CSM was briefed on these metrics at the summit - can you elaborate on how much of a hit subs and game activity took? or is this NDA'd? i didn't see any hard numbers mentioned in the minutes... |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
165
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 13:01:00 -
[313] - Quote
Xtraneous wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:
That they did... Subs took a hit, overall in-game activity took a hit, etc. It's a shame CCP has not yet learned to listen to what we say to an extent that would be beneficial.
I've been curious about this since it was mentioned the CSM was briefed on these metrics at the summit - can you elaborate on how much of a hit subs and game activity took? or is this NDA'd? i didn't see any hard numbers mentioned in the minutes...
IIRC, the exact number was NDA'd and CCP haven't released active sub numbers since. For what it's worth, Mittani reported that he was very surprised to see such high numbers of cancellations, - and this was in the context of people floating numbers around the 5,000 mark just from the "unsubscribed" thread. My seat of the pants guess would be in the 10-20,000 range.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal made on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
165
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 13:02:00 -
[314] - Quote
BugraT WarheaD wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Plus frankly that person is doing a good job. I'm sad the same can't be said of the (imo) idiots in charge of pricing strategy but that's a separate issue. I totally agree with this. Why a so idiot pricing strategy ... If Nex prices were divided by 10, i'm sure there's a lot of people to buy stuff from that shop 
IIRC, the "concept" was that they wanted to establish EVE as a "Premium brand".
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal made on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
182
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 13:04:00 -
[315] - Quote
Xtraneous wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:
That they did... Subs took a hit, overall in-game activity took a hit, etc. It's a shame CCP has not yet learned to listen to what we say to an extent that would be beneficial.
I've been curious about this since it was mentioned the CSM was briefed on these metrics at the summit - can you elaborate on how much of a hit subs and game activity took? or is this NDA'd? i didn't see any hard numbers mentioned in the minutes...
And I don't believe you will, except post facto in CCP's shareholder document thingie. Either way that's not for me to decide, and other than rabble and rabble and "I told you so"s, there's no real value in publishing this, is there? Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Xtraneous
Sam's Space Guys
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 13:38:00 -
[316] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:there's no real value in publishing this, is there?
As a businessman numbers tend to be the first thing I look at. As Hilmar crudely pointed out they underpin the whole decision making process. If subs had increased post incarna I doubt any amount of forum rage would have altered CCPs plans. So the extent of subscription losses would be useful indicator of future CCP decisions. I was just curious really, professional habits make it the obvious question to ask.
Having said that, if I was running CCP I wouldn't be releasing that data either - as you say it doesn't do anyone any good.
|

Cearain
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
38
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 13:39:00 -
[317] - Quote
Trying to read through this thread, I can't tell if you met with Zulu for the follow up meeting or not.
If you do meet with him and he tells you how many new devs will be assigned to FIS please post it in a new thread. I would be interested in the numbers of devs assigned to the different aspects. He posted some numbers in 7/2010 and we can see how the game became stagnant. I want to see how these numbers changed or when they are going to change.
If you meet with him and he won't give you the specific numbers devs of assigned to each aspect of FIS (or tells you but you are supposed to keep it a secret from the players, via nds) then don't bother.
If we can't hear how many new devs are going to be assigned to FIS then we can safely assume eve will continue to stagnate.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
140
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 13:44:00 -
[318] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Trying to read through this thread, I can't tell if you met with Zulu for the follow up meeting or not.
If you do meet with him and he tells you how many new devs will be assigned to FIS please post it in a new thread. I would be interested in the numbers of devs assigned to the different aspects. He posted some numbers in 7/2010 and we can see how the game became stagnant. I want to see how these numbers changed or when they are going to change.
If you meet with him and he won't give you the specific numbers devs of assigned to each aspect of FIS (or tells you but you are supposed to keep it a secret from the players, via nds) then don't bother.
If we can't hear how many new devs are going to be assigned to FIS then we can safely assume eve will continue to stagnate.
The follow up meeting will be sometime this week, we haven't set a date/time yet.
The numbers haven't changed all that much from his past dev blog, which is the main reason we have been going to the media and met with Zulu. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Richard Aiel
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:12:00 -
[319] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Flamespar wrote:After listening to all the raging on these forums I am of the opinion that what Hilmar should have said in his email was
"We will watch what the silent majority does rather than listen to the vocal minority." That they did... Subs took a hit, overall in-game activity took a hit, etc. It's a shame CCP has not yet learned to listen to what we say to an extent that would be beneficial.
Its funny, reading the minutes and seeing ccps responses to their questions and outbursts, you see a lot in ccps stance an the parent patting a wayward child on the head for their mistakes. in this context it comes off as condescending. How the CSM can even think they have any real power at all after reading that meeting is laughable.
And if this is the CCP-approved version, what was it really like lol
Two step wrote:
The follow up meeting will be sometime this week, we haven't set a date/time yet.
The numbers haven't changed all that much from his past dev blog, which is the main reason we have been going to the media and met with Zulu.
Ill have to try an find the quote but I like the guy that linked the delay in the supercap nerf to mittans' supposed rage lol "If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave." Quoth the Hillmar |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
182
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:48:00 -
[320] - Quote
Richard Aiel wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Flamespar wrote:After listening to all the raging on these forums I am of the opinion that what Hilmar should have said in his email was
"We will watch what the silent majority does rather than listen to the vocal minority." That they did... Subs took a hit, overall in-game activity took a hit, etc. It's a shame CCP has not yet learned to listen to what we say to an extent that would be beneficial. Its funny, reading the minutes and seeing ccps responses to their questions and outbursts, you see a lot in ccps stance an the parent patting a wayward child on the head for their mistakes. in this context it comes off as condescending. How the CSM can even think they have any real power at all after reading that meeting is laughable. And if this is the CCP-approved version, what was it really like lol
Actually, the meetings have at all times been pretty cordial and in mutual respect. We regularly have strong words, on both sides, about the other's stance towards things, but it's usually pretty constructive. I can remember about 5 meetings out of the 100+ I've attended out of where I've come thinking the CCP person was full of **** and a waste of time to talk to.
There have been meetings where CCP wouldn't budge on a stance no matter the arguments provided. Sometimes for crap reasons (mandatory CQ is an example of a decision being made for crap reasons as far as I'm concerned) but sometimes for "good" reasons we happened to disagree with. The latter being mostly with game design, but these are usually the result of getting the facts right and being unsure what the impact of something will be or the desirability of a change in terms of impact on the game. These are perfectly fine by me, I provide feedback, if they understand what I'm saying and deem what I think undesirable acceptable, then they're making an informed decision, which is all I can ask.
One thing you have to remember is that you'll _very_ rarely see CCP saying they screwed up, even when it's obvious they did. They'll provide explanations and justifications, but public admission of failure? Rarely... Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
52
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 14:59:00 -
[321] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:lotta stuff...
They'll provide explanations and justifications, but admission of failure? Rarely... Now THERE is some scary CSM insight. ...to think my favorite game is being by Chevrolet Motors... I hope Iceland has a "too big to fail" policy in their country too...  ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
195
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:04:00 -
[322] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:lotta stuff...
They'll provide explanations and justifications, but admission of failure? Rarely... Now THERE is some scary CSM insight. ...to think my favorite game is being by Chevrolet Motors... I hope Iceland has a "too big to fail" policy in their country too... 
Sorry, I mistyped my comment, I added "public" in "public admission of failure".
They'll admit to us they f..ked up allright, but doing so in public is different. (Hey, who likes that). Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Nonnori Ikkala
Love for You
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:25:00 -
[323] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:That scheme stopped repeating itself for "micro" things (feature details) somewhere during CSM 3, now let's hope they evolve the same way for macro things. Good to know change in CCP's attitude isn't impossible. Any particularly salient examples for those of us not around a few years ago? |

Cearain
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
42
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 15:36:00 -
[324] - Quote
Two step wrote:Cearain wrote:Trying to read through this thread, I can't tell if you met with Zulu for the follow up meeting or not.
If you do meet with him and he tells you how many new devs will be assigned to FIS please post it in a new thread. I would be interested in the numbers of devs assigned to the different aspects. He posted some numbers in 7/2010 and we can see how the game became stagnant. I want to see how these numbers changed or when they are going to change.
If you meet with him and he won't give you the specific numbers devs of assigned to each aspect of FIS (or tells you but you are supposed to keep it a secret from the players, via nds) then don't bother.
If we can't hear how many new devs are going to be assigned to FIS then we can safely assume eve will continue to stagnate.
The follow up meeting will be sometime this week, we haven't set a date/time yet. The numbers haven't changed all that much from his past dev blog, which is the main reason we have been going to the media and met with Zulu.
Thanks for the response. I did see this came up in the minutes from your first summit. It didn't take allot of space in the minutes, but I am glad CSM6 recognizes it as crucial.
Thanks for your continued efforts on this. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Azelor Delaria
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming The 0rphanage
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 16:08:00 -
[325] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:I'm informing you of a process in place, not of CCP saying "we'll look at it somewhere down the line". One process that should generate progress or at least an answer because they're looking at it now...
Before you decry the results of that process to be meaningless, why don't you wait for the result to come out?
Whether that process produces the necessary outcome or not, I'll be posting here again to tell you what came of it anyway. The good thing is that there's *something* going on.
As soon as there's developments, there will be an update. In the meantime I'm reading this thread and others to make sure I get your collective opinion to relay it to CCP for the next meeting.
You informed us of nothing. All you said was, "We met with CCP Zulu, who is the senior developer for EVE Online and has absolutely no control over what goes on because he's not a 'suit' like Hilmar". You provided no details about what was said, citing the NDA. You provided no details as to what was mentioned, citing the NDA. You provided no specific topics, citing the NDA.
The reason we are "decrying" the results is because there have been no results. Once again, we have absolutely nothing going on that supports anything you say. A supercapital ship nerf? Congratulations. But it was something that was coming, not something you single-handedly as the current CSM suggested happen. You are piggybacking off of the collective works of previous CSMs even if you were on it or not.
As someone else said, CCP says what they want you to hear, then does what they want to do. That's par for the proverbial course. They created a game where lying, cheating, swindling, and general asshattery commonly frowned upon in real life is the everyday norm. Why should we believe that the developers of such a game aren't lying to us? |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
52
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 16:18:00 -
[326] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Gogela wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:lotta stuff...
They'll provide explanations and justifications, but admission of failure? Rarely... Now THERE is some scary CSM insight. ...to think my favorite game is being by Chevrolet Motors... I hope Iceland has a "too big to fail" policy in their country too...  Sorry, I mistyped my comment, I added "public" in "public admission of failure". They'll admit to us they f..ked up allright, but doing so in public is different. (Hey, who likes that). Well that's a relief. If they will at least admit internally when they are fu**ing up that's fine... at least they will do that. I would rather be in the dark but know they will admit mistakes and not be afraid to correct course than to be in the know with a broken company...
 ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

Zleon Leigh
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 17:03:00 -
[327] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Neftaran wrote:I truly do not see why do you space politicians even bother posting this type of information. It's getting so repetitive and pointless. You wave your saber around to garner some attention.. CCP lets things gestate for a few days and then low and behold it's time for a meeting. You have your meeting then regurgitate the same responses we've been hearing for years. Few months from now we will get some more space drama and the never ending spin cycle of b.s. will start over again.
Player representation is nothing more than an illusion. Great, don't vote in CSM7, and I'll keep all this power and influence to myself. No big!
Are the results from the independent auditors on CSM on-shore/off-shore bank accounts in yet?
Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital. |

Swearte Widfarend
Aurora Security Transstellar Operations
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 17:44:00 -
[328] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Khira Kitamatsu wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Guys, there is nothing any of us can say at this point more than what we've said.
But know that we are working hard on your behalf to get CCP to address your concerns regarding FiS. More like on behalf of the people that play in null-sec. If you've been playing the game at all you'd realize what happens in nullsec affects empire, and vice versa. This game has many similarities to a functioning ecology - remove one species or poison one habitat and the whole chain is disrupted. I simply dont buy that you can fight for change in one area of eve and not have repercussions elsewhere. It is NO coincidence that amidst all the hubbub about nullsec stagnation, we are seeing a spike in lowsec of displaced and bored alliances going on the roam and searching inward for fights, isk, and lulz.
Forums ate my post. At least some things don't change.
The ability of the average empire player to comprehend the interaction between nullsec and empire is tenuous, at best.
WIthout the player-driven content in nullsec (translation: PvP fleet fights and ships blowing up in large volumes) your pretty loots, salvage, and LP items placed on the market don't sell for you as a profit.
Anything done to improve Nullsec, and break the spiral of declining subscriptions and logins (one of my accounts lapsed this weekend, not sure when I'll resub it if at all) will improve the markets and hence the profits of the Empire players. Ship balancing done for nullsec works in Empire (well, mostly), which benefits Empire players. In fact, it might be a safe statement that almost any change to improve nullsec would be good for EVE as a whole, which you can't say about any change to empire. (sorry, mission buff doesn't create player content which creates marketing which brings new players). |

Swooshie
USA Canada Private Corp
17
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 17:48:00 -
[329] - Quote
gogela wrote:Well that's a relief. If they will at least admit internally when they are fu**ing up that's fine... at least they will do that. I would rather be in the dark but know they will admit mistakes and not be afraid to correct course than to be in the know with a broken company...
I'll even go further:
I don't even give a flying beep if they admit they are wrong or not IF I see corrections being made whenever something is clearly wrong. Expertise and professionalism speak louder then words when they are there.
I wise man once said that the crowd would be judged by its actions not words...
I shall do the same |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
518
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 18:17:00 -
[330] - Quote
Dalketh wrote:Vaako Horizon wrote:
This was a bone... instead of this crap you guys should have been silent... Reason? well, this bone will now make us long for something again which if it ever happens ( as it feels atm not ever ) its gonna be a long long time until we see it.
THIS EXACTLY. CCP messes up - CSM supposedly to the rescue - CSM satisfied with CCP saying/promising blah blah blah... we wait... and nothing.... CSM angry... summits... emergency meetings... CSM say wait they are optimistic... then NOTHING.... CSM gets up in arms... we supposed to pay attention yet again... then CSM pleased... then NOTHING... over and over. Year after year. 'This time will be different'... don't you understand you are wearing us out? If you can't make a difference... quit. If you can... we haven't really seen it and are tired. Mitten's profanity filled speeches and Trebor's damage control not withstanding... we are feeling hopeless imo.... thats what I see. FYI a nullsec boost (since the current CSM so null-sec heavy) isn't going to cut it if that is current thought.
That's one of the funnier things about being from nullsec and then getting a spot on the CSM. We swear casually all the time, it's completely unremarkable. You give a speech to people from hisec and suddenly you begin to encounter the tiny population of players who can somehow find it in themselves to still be upset by "dirty words" - in a game with no law but that of the jungle. Amazing. |
|

Steph Wing
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 18:21:00 -
[331] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:One thing you have to remember is that you'll _very_ rarely see CCP saying they screwed up, even when it's obvious they did. They'll provide explanations and justifications, but public admission of failure? Rarely...
I'm sure the CSM has expressed many times how much damage control a simple "mea culpa" in CCP's Official Voice would do.
And I'm sure it's been dismissed/ignored. Sigh. |

J Kunjeh
75
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 18:24:00 -
[332] - Quote
The Mittani wrote: That's one of the funnier things about being from nullsec and then getting a spot on the CSM. We swear casually all the time, it's completely unremarkable. You give a speech to people from hisec and suddenly you begin to encounter the tiny population of players who can somehow find it in themselves to still be upset by "dirty words" - in a game with no law but that of the jungle. Amazing.
That's sorta like saying "we're foul-mouthed pirates in the locker room, but my mom slaps me stoopid every time I say bastard at the dinner table". See, not all of us are psychopathic animals like you coyote's out in Null with your dirty, dirty mouths. Now go wash that thing out with soap.
"The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5)-á |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
518
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 18:24:00 -
[333] - Quote
Getting CCP to admit mistakes in plain english is very hard. The more defensive they are, the more likely their interlocutors at the higher levels are to use weasel words and lengthy caveats. That's pretty standard for most corporations though. It's frustrating as hell but I suppose it's par for the course?
Even if it's commonplace, it annoys me. A bit of 'we ****** up, we know it' realtalk with the players would go a long way towards restoring trust. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
316
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 18:35:00 -
[334] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Getting CCP to admit mistakes in plain english is very hard. The more defensive they are, the more likely their interlocutors at the higher levels are to use weasel words and lengthy caveats. That's pretty standard for most corporations though. It's frustrating as hell but I suppose it's par for the course?
Even if it's commonplace, it annoys me. A bit of 'we ****** up, we know it' realtalk with the players would go a long way towards restoring trust.
At this point I care less about them admitting they've chronically under-resourced and neglected core Eve Online for the last several years than in them commiting immediately to a return to proper expansions with genuinely-impressive content and feature sets that use a significant portion of their manpower to produce.
If Hillmar wants to blame volcanic ash for the crap state of Eve so be it.
Just get them to start producing Exodus/Apocrypha scale development again and I think everyone will be very happy.
They were able to do this once when they were much smaller. There is no reason they can't do it again. (especially not when the potential survival of their sole current income-source is at risk)
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
518
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 18:40:00 -
[335] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:The Mittani wrote:Getting CCP to admit mistakes in plain english is very hard. The more defensive they are, the more likely their interlocutors at the higher levels are to use weasel words and lengthy caveats. That's pretty standard for most corporations though. It's frustrating as hell but I suppose it's par for the course?
Even if it's commonplace, it annoys me. A bit of 'we ****** up, we know it' realtalk with the players would go a long way towards restoring trust. At this point I care less about them admitting they've chronically under-resourced and neglected core Eve Online for the last several years than in them commiting immediately to a return to proper expansions with genuinely-impressive content and feature sets that use a significant portion of their manpower to produce. If Hillmar wants to blame volcanic ash for the crap state of Eve so be it. Just get them to start producing Exodus/ Apocrypha scale development again and I think everyone will be very happy. They were able to do this once when they were much smaller. There is no reason they can't do it again. (especially not when the potential survival of their sole current income-source is at risk)
sigh, + repping another jade post
fml |

Officer Spawn
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 18:55:00 -
[336] - Quote
Without getting into exactly what was said in the meeting, how can the CSM verify that what Zulu said has happened or will happen really did take place ? If he said "30 extra developers working full time on FiS from December 1st" is there some way in which you can check this really happened in a reliable way ? |

Orakkus
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 20:25:00 -
[337] - Quote
I guess my question is based on what "Project A" is.
The rest of the meeting minutes seem to not address anything much in Incarna. So can the CSM confirm the "Project A" is an Incarna based update? |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
52
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 20:46:00 -
[338] - Quote
...not sure if this has been posted before or if anyone cares, but there are some insightful reviews here. ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

Cearain
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
42
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 21:10:00 -
[339] - Quote
Officer Spawn wrote:Without getting into exactly what was said in the meeting, how can the CSM verify that what Zulu said has happened or will happen really did take place ? If he said "30 extra developers working full time on FiS from December 1st" is there some way in which you can check this really happened in a reliable way ?
I don't think CCP has been dishonest in the past. If they say they are assigning these devs to these activities I will believe it.
I believed Zulu's blog in July 2010. I believed them when they said they wouldn't be able to work on much in eve for 18 months. It disgusts me that they are neglecting eve, but I can't say they were dishonest about it. In fact they have been brutally honest.
In any event, the csm would certainly be able to tell when they meet with ccp. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 21:11:00 -
[340] - Quote
The Mittani wrote: sigh, + repping another jade post
fml
What have we become? 
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
|

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
53
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 21:12:00 -
[341] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:
Even if it's commonplace, it annoys me. A bit of 'we ****** up, we know it' realtalk with the players would go a long way towards restoring trust.
Except it doesnt:
see here
Well the posts other than the ones that read "oh its ok, you admitted it" but those are usually also the guys that do the same thing WHENEVER CCP screws up "Its OK get back to work" *cheery smile* They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 21:12:00 -
[342] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:The Mittani wrote:Getting CCP to admit mistakes in plain english is very hard. The more defensive they are, the more likely their interlocutors at the higher levels are to use weasel words and lengthy caveats. That's pretty standard for most corporations though. It's frustrating as hell but I suppose it's par for the course?
Even if it's commonplace, it annoys me. A bit of 'we ****** up, we know it' realtalk with the players would go a long way towards restoring trust. At this point I care less about them admitting they've chronically under-resourced and neglected core Eve Online for the last several years than in them commiting immediately to a return to proper expansions with genuinely-impressive content and feature sets that use a significant portion of their manpower to produce. If Hillmar wants to blame volcanic ash for the crap state of Eve so be it. Just get them to start producing Exodus/ Apocrypha scale development again and I think everyone will be very happy. They were able to do this once when they were much smaller. There is no reason they can't do it again. (especially not when the potential survival of their sole current income-source is at risk)
When did you get all ~succint~ ? Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
316
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 21:19:00 -
[343] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:The Mittani wrote:Getting CCP to admit mistakes in plain english is very hard. The more defensive they are, the more likely their interlocutors at the higher levels are to use weasel words and lengthy caveats. That's pretty standard for most corporations though. It's frustrating as hell but I suppose it's par for the course?
Even if it's commonplace, it annoys me. A bit of 'we ****** up, we know it' realtalk with the players would go a long way towards restoring trust. At this point I care less about them admitting they've chronically under-resourced and neglected core Eve Online for the last several years than in them commiting immediately to a return to proper expansions with genuinely-impressive content and feature sets that use a significant portion of their manpower to produce. If Hillmar wants to blame volcanic ash for the crap state of Eve so be it. Just get them to start producing Exodus/ Apocrypha scale development again and I think everyone will be very happy. They were able to do this once when they were much smaller. There is no reason they can't do it again. (especially not when the potential survival of their sole current income-source is at risk) When did you get all ~succint~ ?
We're all on the same side of the barricades for this revolution baby.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

the plague
Anthraxus Defense Laboratories
17
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 21:25:00 -
[344] - Quote
Azelor Delaria wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:I'm informing you of a process in place, not of CCP saying "we'll look at it somewhere down the line". One process that should generate progress or at least an answer because they're looking at it now...
Before you decry the results of that process to be meaningless, why don't you wait for the result to come out? You informed us of nothing. All you said was, "We met with CCP Zulu, who is the senior developer for EVE Online and has absolutely no control over what goes on because he's not a 'suit' like Hilmar". You provided no details about what was said, citing the NDA. You provided no details as to what was mentioned, citing the NDA. You provided no specific topics, citing the NDA. The reason we are "decrying" the results is because there have been no results. Once again, we have absolutely nothing going on that supports anything you say. A supercapital ship nerf? Congratulations. But it was something that was coming, not something you single-handedly as the current CSM suggested happen. You are piggybacking off of the collective works of previous CSMs even if you were on it or not. As someone else said, CCP says what they want you to hear, then does what they want to do. That's par for the proverbial course. They created a game where lying, cheating, swindling, and general asshattery commonly frowned upon in real life is the everyday norm. Why should we believe that the developers of such a game aren't lying to us?
+1
More NDA rubbish. Nothing but a smokescreen. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
52
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 21:26:00 -
[345] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:We're all on the same side of the barricades for this revolution baby.
Ever since I started playing this game there's been a lot of back and forth between players... but with the dropping sub numbers and worse the dropping player numbers on the servers and nothing really worthwhile in near-term sight... I think you are right on about that. It's really a first for the community I think.
...wonder if it will matter.
I like the game. ...but I'm not committed to the game.
CCP should be. They get paid. I, conversely, do not.
Richard Hammond II wrote:The Mittani wrote:
Even if it's commonplace, it annoys me. A bit of 'we ****** up, we know it' realtalk with the players would go a long way towards restoring trust.
Except it doesnt: see hereWell the posts other than the ones that read "oh its ok, you admitted it" but those are usually also the guys that do the same thing WHENEVER CCP screws up "Its OK get back to work" *cheery smile*
All I read there was "We didn't get to it. We quit. Sorries." ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

Zinyai
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 22:13:00 -
[346] - Quote
Oust The Mittani from CSM. We don't need his arrogance! |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
52
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 22:29:00 -
[347] - Quote
Zinyai wrote:Oust The Mittani from CSM. We don't need his arrogance! I was thinking the same thing yesterday.... he certainly is arrogant and obnoxious... but this morning I was coding a payment gateway for a website, and I stepped out, had a cigarette, and changed my mind. Here's why:
Mit is obnoxious.
...but CCP has ignored the core gameplay for 2 years-ish now. Dominion was never improved upon. PI is like a Zynga facebook game but more boring (no I don't play them). Incarna was released w/ one captains quarters, and none of the social interaction they promised (yah yah it's coming at the end of the year or soon or whateverthehell). I mean... what happened to grand developments like Apocrypha? I mean when I see people in the forums asking for FiS stuff no one even THINKS one the scale of Revelations anymore because it's a forgone conclusion that CCP isn't capable of that kind of development anymore. I'm not happy about it... and I can't do anything about it. So in a way, Mit is kind of a community weapon to deploy to CCP. Now THEY have to deal with his arrogance. It actually kind of makes sense to me... if you want to present a stoic and solitary middle finger to CCP, who better to send than lord of the Goons? With that in mind, I've actually done a complete 180 on the matter.
F*** it.
Mit for CSM7.
*waves goon flag ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

Trebor Daehdoow
Sane Industries Inc.
111
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 22:52:00 -
[348] - Quote
Orakkus wrote:I guess my question is based on what "Project A" is.
The rest of the meeting minutes seem to not address anything much in Incarna. So can the CSM confirm the "Project A" is an Incarna based update? We can neither confirm nor deny the confirmation or denial of whether or not Project "A" is or is not related to anything that may or may not be associated with Incarna.
I hope this clarifies matters sufficiently.  CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM blog |

Officer Spawn
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 08:13:00 -
[349] - Quote
Cearain wrote:
I don't think CCP has been dishonest in the past. If they say they are assigning these devs to these activities I will believe it.
I believed Zulu's blog in July 2010. I believed them when they said they wouldn't be able to work on much in eve for 18 months. It disgusts me that they are neglecting eve, but I can't say they were dishonest about it. In fact they have been brutally honest.
In any event, the csm would certainly be able to tell when they meet with ccp.
Looking back at Zulu's blog from :18 months: ago I saw this:
Quote:Of those, seven are on loan from other projects - to which they will return once Incarna is launched
Incarna was launched so all these teams are back to the other projects ?
|

Basileus Volkan
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 08:23:00 -
[350] - Quote
Arrogance is usually only seen as such from below.
Ones personal feelings towards a political figure do not determine their competence. In fact, as far as I am aware, the current CSM has done a lot more than the previous ones. |
|

Metlec
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 08:24:00 -
[351] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
I cannot tell you anything
Stay tuned...
Thanks for that..
|

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
195
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 08:42:00 -
[352] - Quote
Basileus Volkan wrote:Arrogance is usually only seen as such from below.
Ones personal feelings towards a political figure do not determine their competence. In fact, as far as I am aware, the current CSM has done a lot more than the previous ones.
That's a bit of a side issue, but one that bears repeating.
Having been on all those pasts CSMs (except the first), I am in a very good position to tell you that while the quality of elected members has overall increased, the major progress in terms of ability to accomplish things is because the CSM-CCP process has strongly evolved.
Practical examples: During CSM 2, communication between CSM and CCP was limited to exactly 1 summit in Iceland and 1 brainstorming session with CCP Abathur and CCP Greyscale. No "pre-meeting", no post-meeting, nothing. Something CSM 2 fought to change. During CSM 3, communication between CSM and CCP was limited to 1 iceland summit and 2 online meetings. During CSM 4, we got the stakeholder status that allowed us to fight for the inclusion of "our" items in the release plan (the list of stuff includded in an expansion), before that it was up to devs to pick stuff from our list if they chose to. During CSM 5, communication was extended to a lot of forum dialog with the devs (the private CSM forum was only used by CSM members before that). We got devs to start poking us about requests that they have while they were developping stuff. So far, during CSM 6, we got a few of the key devs (or just cool devs) to hang out with us in a skype channel where a lot of discussions can take place, in addition to an increased dev presence on the forums.
The CSM is only as good as its capacity to engage the devs in dialog and give them feedback. Each CSM has added more communication abilities on top of what its predecessor already had, it should therefore come as no surprise that each CSM is able to accomplish more.
Also, while initially many devs were very cautious about the CSM ("who the hell are these players hanging about in the office"), over the terms they've come to accept us as a good feedback tool. We're only as good as CCP's willingness to use us (I think I'll forever have CSM 3 Zastrow's "but please use us as cheap hookers" request in my mind :p)
So, yes, CSM 6 looks set to do a better job than CSM 5, but not as a question of effort on the part of previous CSMs. Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Wolfcan
EVE University Ivy League
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 09:21:00 -
[353] - Quote
Dalketh wrote:Yup yet another meeting with the CSM then no information due to NDA and everyone told to wait - AGAIN. CCP is getting smarter tho... this time they arranged the meeting more quickly to nip it in the bud and get the CSM to shut up.
+1 this absolutely! |

Azelor Delaria
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming The 0rphanage
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 09:51:00 -
[354] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:The CSM is only as good as its capacity to engage the devs in dialog and give them feedback. Each CSM has added more communication abilities on top of what its predecessor already had, it should therefore come as no surprise that each CSM is able to accomplish more.
I disagree. By the admission of many on the current CSM as well as CCP employees, the abilities of the CSM are directly related to how Hilmer et al. respond. You can get every developer in CCP to agree with you, but if they don't have the resources that Hilmar controls and allocates, then it is all for naught.
If you want anything done, you need to get Hilmar's approval. In the end, he is the only person who matters. Developers, as I have said, can swear up and down that they agree, and they will get it done, but if Hilmar refuses to give them the components needed to effectively do their job, then it's your own fault for not engaging your brain and thinking beyond the small box that every member of the current CSM is standing in. |

Apollo-Moor
xHELLonEARTHx Rookie Empire
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 09:57:00 -
[355] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online) and, despite Gridlock and Team BFF's efforts, general stagnation when it comes to fixes and improvements, the CSM just met with CCP's Senor Producer for Eve Online: CCP Zulu.
During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6
Thus is funny.. You told them about the stuff they've known about for months and then you can't actually tell us what you told them.. So how do we know you even brought up the right stuff.. or if they even responded to the right stuff in the "right stuff"..
I'm starting to understand the questions of these CSM's and how CCP is actually using this info other than finding an easier $
|

Barricade Dark
39
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 10:00:00 -
[356] - Quote
Wolfcan wrote:Dalketh wrote:Yup yet another meeting with the CSM then no information due to NDA and everyone told to wait - AGAIN. CCP is getting smarter tho... this time they arranged the meeting more quickly to nip it in the bud and get the CSM to shut up.
+1 this absolutely!
Yup thats pretty much my take on it as well. The whole thing boils down to a commitment "To look at it".
I'm a software developer so I do understand this to some extent I do it at work all the time. You simply can't drop what you are doing everytime someone has a complaint or an idea about software we are writing. Their are project plans and coders assigned to those projects their is just not a whole lot of room to adjust it and you sure as hell don't want to start re-designing **** while your still coding the original design. So you throw the execs a bone, a promise to add whatever feature they are requesting in "a future version" with no fixed time table nore an adjustment to the development cycle, just some notes in a file that no one will ever look at. Of course we make exceptions if we foresee a real problem somewhere, but generally we stick to the program because if we didn't nothing would ever be completed.
Thats the thing about development. There is no such thing as a small change, in particular in complex software. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 10:07:00 -
[357] - Quote
Azelor Delaria wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:The CSM is only as good as its capacity to engage the devs in dialog and give them feedback. Each CSM has added more communication abilities on top of what its predecessor already had, it should therefore come as no surprise that each CSM is able to accomplish more. I disagree. By the admission of many on the current CSM as well as CCP employees, the abilities of the CSM are directly related to how Hilmer et al. respond. You can get every developer in CCP to agree with you, but if they don't have the resources that Hilmar controls and allocates, then it is all for naught. If you want anything done, you need to get Hilmar's approval. In the end, he is the only person who matters. Developers, as I have said, can swear up and down that they agree, and they will get it done, but if Hilmar refuses to give them the components needed to effectively do their job, then it's your own fault for not engaging your brain and thinking beyond the small box that every member of the current CSM is standing in.
You seem to be under the impression that the CSM don't understand a point which they themselves have been making for weeks. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

raker
Imperial Collective
13
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 10:17:00 -
[358] - Quote
Zinyai wrote:Oust The Mittani from CSM. We don't need his arrogance!
I am no fan of Mittani, and yes he is arrogant
However on this issue, I feel the fact that all the CSM spoke as one may of got results, I understand that they cannot inform us of what has been said due to NDA's, but if the upper guys in CCP now know that we want some resources put into FIS and if we get to see some results , then I feel that Mittani has done a good job
This is what the CSM should be there for, to inform CCP of what the playerbase want
But to use CCP's own term, lets see "what they do and not what they say"
|

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
152
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 10:49:00 -
[359] - Quote
Azelor Delaria wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:The CSM is only as good as its capacity to engage the devs in dialog and give them feedback. Each CSM has added more communication abilities on top of what its predecessor already had, it should therefore come as no surprise that each CSM is able to accomplish more. I disagree. By the admission of many on the current CSM as well as CCP employees, the abilities of the CSM are directly related to how Hilmer et al. respond. You can get every developer in CCP to agree with you, but if they don't have the resources that Hilmar controls and allocates, then it is all for naught. If you want anything done, you need to get Hilmar's approval. In the end, he is the only person who matters. Developers, as I have said, can swear up and down that they agree, and they will get it done, but if Hilmar refuses to give them the components needed to effectively do their job, then it's your own fault for not engaging your brain and thinking beyond the small box that every member of the current CSM is standing in.
This is somewhat true. There is still a lot of value in getting devs at CCP to agree with us, this is why you get stuff like supercap balance, the dramiel/logi fixes, etc. to happen. In this case, the issue is bigger than that, but a large part of our work is not Hilmar related stuff. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Officer Spawn
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 10:55:00 -
[360] - Quote
Two step wrote:the dramiel/logi fixes
That's like three database updates. Is this seriously something we have to compliment Hilmar on as an example of his commitment to allocating resources to FiS ? |
|

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
152
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 11:24:00 -
[361] - Quote
Officer Spawn wrote:Two step wrote:the dramiel/logi fixes That's like three database updates. Is this seriously something we have to compliment Hilmar on as an example of his commitment to allocating resources to FiS ?
Um, I was saying that stuff like that is non-Hilmar stuff. Getting more resources on FiS is Hilmar level, but there are plenty of things in game that need to be fixed that are easy, as you point out. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
195
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 11:30:00 -
[362] - Quote
Azelor Delaria wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:The CSM is only as good as its capacity to engage the devs in dialog and give them feedback. Each CSM has added more communication abilities on top of what its predecessor already had, it should therefore come as no surprise that each CSM is able to accomplish more. I disagree. By the admission of many on the current CSM as well as CCP employees, the abilities of the CSM are directly related to how Hilmer et al. respond. You can get every developer in CCP to agree with you, but if they don't have the resources that Hilmar controls and allocates, then it is all for naught. If you want anything done, you need to get Hilmar's approval. In the end, he is the only person who matters. Developers, as I have said, can swear up and down that they agree, and they will get it done, but if Hilmar refuses to give them the components needed to effectively do their job, then it's your own fault for not engaging your brain and thinking beyond the small box that every member of the current CSM is standing in.
It depends...
The CSM performs more than one function, or should...
The ability to influence what is being worked on. Let's say we think lowsec deserves some love. Part of our job as stakeholders is to influence CCP to include lowsec related changes in their release plan for an expansion. This part is in progress but already functions. Maybe not to the extent we'd like, but generally I'd say this works. I'd also agree that we shouldn't have the ability to dictate fully what is being worked on, for even though we try to be mindful of things we care less about, it's important to leave CCP some ability to come up with their own things and/or surprise us (incursions are an example of this).
The ability to influence how the things being worked on get implemented or changed. This function we already perform quite well. Devs come to us for feedback on things that are "ours" or not, or we give them preemptive feedback. I'd say we've had a say in the implementation details of the vast majority of things that have been modified these past years. Some we didn't get to give feedback on because they're trivial and that's fine, some we didn't get to give feedback on because we didn't even know they were being worked on. This latter one is being resolved this CSM I think, we're making progress on getting visibility on what people are working on. Overall this function is good.
The ability to influence how much the things being worked on get worked on. ie, resource allocation. This one fails very much so far. It's a question of politics here. If, for instance, someone wants 50% of the people in reykavik working on InCarna and 25% on the Eve/Dust link, that leaves only 25% of reykavik working on stuff we care about (flying in space, making stuff and blowing stuff up). So while we may get the details right for that 1/4th, the fact that it's only 1/4th is what we're very concerned about and what CSM 5 tried (and failed) to alter. This bit heavily depends on "the powers that be" and this is what we're working on solving right now. We tried before by using substantiated reasonable (imo) arguments but that failed. We'll see how successful CSM 6 is in that regard.
As far as your assumption that Hilmar is the one that matters, that is very partially true. Senior Producer, Executive Producer, Creative Director, Technical Director, CEO, etc. all play a significant part in deciding that kind of thing. Hilmar is a very important part of the puzzle, but not the only one. The good thing is that, in my experience, the man is not an idiot. The only question is how accurate is the information he bases his decisions on. Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

weat bix
Kiwi's and Company DUST ALLIANCE
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 12:04:00 -
[363] - Quote
NDA is a great way of saying that the csm spoke about improving there own ideas while ignoring everyone else. lets change null sec to what will best suit csm members and they can always hide what was spoken about by using the nda. harsh I know but i for one have no faith in the csm looking after anyone but them self. |

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 12:04:00 -
[364] - Quote
Sorry for the scepticism but, you had a summit in july where a lot of assurances were given by both CCP and CSM with regards communication, the return of functionality, a wider range of nex pricing and a commitment to do better.
The "minutes" of that emergency meeting are only released after months of wrangling and prove to be a most banal and uninformative press release rather than a detailed account of a meeting.
There has been no return of previous functionality, I still cant spin my ship, I still cant save more than 50 fits.
Nex pricing remains unchanged.
Yet from the triumphalist backslapping on this thread you would swear the CSM had actually achieved somthing tangible since July. Their own blogs prove that is not the case.
CSM is being used as a firebreak between CCP and its customers,
How the CSM or CCP can claim to be achieving anything when we are witnessing the largest decline in subsciptions and player numbers in eve memory?
"Pretty words" mean nothing, you achieved nothing in july so why should I accept your going to achieve anything with more meetings more blah blah blah? |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
195
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 12:14:00 -
[365] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:Sorry for the scepticism but, you had a summit in july where a lot of assurances were given by both CCP and CSM with regards communication, the return of functionality, a wider range of nex pricing and a commitment to do better.
The "minutes" of that emergency meeting are only released after months of wrangling and prove to be a most banal and uninformative press release rather than a detailed account of a meeting.
There has been no return of previous functionality, I still cant spin my ship, I still cant save more than 50 fits.
Nex pricing remains unchanged.
Yet from the triumphalist backslapping on this thread you would swear the CSM had actually achieved somthing tangible since July. Their own blogs prove that is not the case.
CSM is being used as a firebreak between CCP and its customers,
How the CSM or CCP can claim to be achieving anything when we are witnessing the largest decline in subsciptions and player numbers in eve memory?
"Pretty words" mean nothing, you achieved nothing in july so why should I accept your going to achieve anything with more meetings more blah blah blah?
Communication is happening (am I not reporting on a meeting with CCP Zulu?) Return of functionality, I don't know what you're talking about, that wasn't part of the july meeting.
Wider range of NeX price. I'm with you there, it's totally stupid of them, and I won't stop saying it until they introduce sensible pricing scheme. Until then they can stick their NeX someplace dark and smelly.
The fact that the minutes are banal to you is a victory to us. The minutes are read by more than the jaded/sarcastic folks who frequent the forum, and what seems mundane to you may not seem so to people who don't spend time here. Not having had those meetings minute turned into marketing speech full of grandiose statements about awesomeness and fearlessness is a victory, whatever you may think.
Ship spinning was agreed to return by CCP, yet if you read the minutes, it didn't say that it'd be returning *NOW*. Until then you're not forced into CQ.
Saving more than 50 ships was not part of the agenda.
The CSM can claim to achieve things because it does, and what we do is not limited to the july meeting, look back a bit more (and look ahead too). The reason the july meeting happened is because of several things, one of which being CCP not having listened to us. Their realizing that is a victory too, for it is a requirement to them realizing they should do so in the future.
Pretty words mean nothing? Wait for the outcome and then judge.
And you should accept what we say because we've reporting things that were true all of the time for the past 3 years. That's why. Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Q Ded
MegaMaid Corp New Eden Research.
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 12:22:00 -
[366] - Quote
LOL at the NDA. |

Physical Peak
Norse'Storm Battle Group Intrepid Crossing
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 12:33:00 -
[367] - Quote
I'm at a loss if by 'ship spinning' the CSM actually thinks we're purely on about ship spinning. By 'ship spinning' we meant the hangar facility where functionality has been lost by its replacement for the 'door' or CQ.
So Meissa Anunthiel, I hope you can clarify exactly what the CSM and CCP mean by 'ship spinning'. |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
195
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 12:41:00 -
[368] - Quote
Physical Peak wrote:I'm at a loss if by 'ship spinning' the CSM actually thinks we're purely on about ship spinning. By 'ship spinning' we meant the hangar facility where functionality has been lost by its replacement for the 'door' or CQ.
So Meissa Anunthiel, I hope you can clarify exactly what the CSM and CCP mean by 'ship spinning'.
There's several "sides" to ship spinning:
- Drag & drop to activate ship - clicking on your ship to open cargo and whatnot - actual ship spinning - not loading the resource hog that is CQ (I may forget a couple)
All legitimate requests. Right now you have the bad door, but at least you don't get the resource hog. The rest should come back. The "old" ship spinning will not come back as it was (old rendering code and other constraints), but we'll get something equivalent. No time commitment has been provided.
My personal stance has been "I don't want you to get rid of the door until I get a suitable replacement to the old hangar", suitable being something that covers most of the previous performance, functionality and looks, in that order. Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 13:35:00 -
[369] - Quote
By functionality I was refferring to the old functionality of the hanger as has been pointed out by others. I do not expect it "NOW" I do however expect some indication of when! Its three months since that summit meissa so its hardly now is it.
Communication between CCP and the players has not improved. I have no complaints about CSM communication all of you including mittens post or blog regularly.
This new meeting is not a success it is an admission that the July meeting wasa failure. If you had been successful in July there would be no need for more emergency meetings to discuss player concerns.
Since the purchase of more fits was talked about in the Fearless article amongst other services that would be for sale for aur and I know you were personally emailed regarding it before the summit in july; Im very dissapointed that you those services was not part of the agenda.
Im not a bittervet or a forum warrior, I would have prefferred to spend a morning off work getting blown up in delve rather than on the forums.
Pretty words do mean nothing I have choked on a surfeit of pretty words recently, It is time for some red meat |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
195
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 14:10:00 -
[370] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:By functionality I was refferring to the old functionality of the hanger as has been pointed out by others. I do not expect it "NOW" I do however expect some indication of when! Its three months since that summit meissa so its hardly now is it.
Communication between CCP and the players has not improved. I have no complaints about CSM communication all of you including mittens post or blog regularly.
This new meeting is not a success it is an admission that the July meeting wasa failure. If you had been successful in July there would be no need for more emergency meetings to discuss player concerns.
Since the purchase of more fits was talked about in the Fearless article amongst other services that would be for sale for aur and I know you were personally emailed regarding it before the summit in july; Im very dissapointed that you those services was not part of the agenda.
Im not a bittervet or a forum warrior, I would have prefferred to spend a morning off work getting blown up in delve rather than on the forums.
Pretty words do mean nothing I have choked on a surfeit of pretty words recently, It is time for some red meat
Anything of substance other than fixes gets released every 6 months.
This has to do with the understaffed and overworked QA department having lots of work to do everytime something like this gets changed, which kinda paralyzes the company for 3-4 days everytime this happens due to branches being merged, builds being made to be tested accross multiple platforms, packages being built, regression tests being tasked to outsourcing companies, etc. So they bundle those significant changes together rather than getting them out one piece at a time. So the soonest you may expect it is the winter expansion.
That fearless article was not released to the public, and the extra fits was talked about in fearless by soundwave as an example of things they COULD do, not something they would do or even should do. And that's something we adressed during the summit (my stance being "either it makes sense to have more and the servers can handle it and you _give_ us more, or it doesn't and you don't, but you don't make me pay for core services").
I however agree it's time for some red meat as you put it, but even if we obtain you that red meat, you won't get it before december for the most part. However we'll be able to ascertain the existence of that meat. Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |
|

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
35
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 14:19:00 -
[371] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Physical Peak wrote:I'm at a loss if by 'ship spinning' the CSM actually thinks we're purely on about ship spinning. By 'ship spinning' we meant the hangar facility where functionality has been lost by its replacement for the 'door' or CQ.
So Meissa Anunthiel, I hope you can clarify exactly what the CSM and CCP mean by 'ship spinning'. There's several "sides" to ship spinning: - Drag & drop to activate ship - clicking on your ship to open cargo and whatnot - actual ship spinning - not loading the resource hog that is CQ (I may forget a couple) All legitimate requests. Right now you have the bad door, but at least you don't get the resource hog. The rest should come back. The "old" ship spinning will not come back as it was (old rendering code and other constraints), but we'll get something equivalent. No time commitment has been provided. My personal stance has been "I don't want you to get rid of the door until I get a suitable replacement to the old hangar", suitable being something that covers most of the previous performance, functionality and looks, in that order. Please don't forget that for many of the players the hanger also means "not getting out of your ship at every dock". This is a very important immersion issue. This is not only for the RP-ers, this is for everyone who treats this game as an escapist entertainment and needs some in-game world consistency that makes at least a bit of sense. |

Physical Peak
Norse'Storm Battle Group Intrepid Crossing
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 14:21:00 -
[372] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Physical Peak wrote:I'm at a loss if by 'ship spinning' the CSM actually thinks we're purely on about ship spinning. By 'ship spinning' we meant the hangar facility where functionality has been lost by its replacement for the 'door' or CQ.
So Meissa Anunthiel, I hope you can clarify exactly what the CSM and CCP mean by 'ship spinning'. There's several "sides" to ship spinning: - Drag & drop to activate ship - clicking on your ship to open cargo and whatnot - actual ship spinning - not loading the resource hog that is CQ (I may forget a couple) All legitimate requests. Right now you have the bad door, but at least you don't get the resource hog. The rest should come back. The "old" ship spinning will not come back as it was (old rendering code and other constraints), but we'll get something equivalent. No time commitment has been provided. My personal stance has been "I don't want you to get rid of the door until I get a suitable replacement to the old hangar", suitable being something that covers most of the previous performance, functionality and looks, in that order.
Glad to hear it. I honestly hope that CCP see it the same way. |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
109
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 14:23:00 -
[373] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:
Pretty words mean nothing? Wait for the outcome and then judge.
And you should accept what we say because we've reporting things that were true all of the time for the past 3 years. That's why.
All well and good, but how long should we wait? 18 Months, 6 Months, 3 Months? In the meantime we are still paying actual money to CCP while the only thing we get is vague promises and assurances even after the "rage".
I won't pay my baker for bread he might make next week today. I won't buy milk from a cow that has not been born yet. I am not paying CCP any more for a game that might improve someday.
I am sorry but I will only pay for red meat that's politly presented on a plate with some sauce and french fries and only then after I have eaten it. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
316
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 14:50:00 -
[374] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:Sorry for the scepticism but, you had a summit in july where a lot of assurances were given by both CCP and CSM with regards communication, the return of functionality, a wider range of nex pricing and a commitment to do better.
I think we can all agree that went nowhere near far enough and we can see that now with the continuing unsub wave and discontent.
Quote:The "minutes" of that emergency meeting are only released after months of wrangling and prove to be a most banal and uninformative press release rather than a detailed account of a meeting.
Yep, the minutes were terrible and it literally enraged me to hear the NeX strategy defended in the terms it was alongside praise of the Incarna CQ rollout. But the CSM have assured us that much of the shouting and hard words didn't really come across. Fair enough, lets hope they do this time.
Quote:There has been no return of previous functionality, I still cant spin my ship, I still cant save more than 50 fits.
I think the downgrading of the "emergency" to "special" summit category shows that CCP felt they could get away with doing nothing but some placating words and a funky video and maybe they'd gull the user base to resubbing and playing happily. This hasn't happened. Hence we're steaming towards the Winter of Discontent in New Eden.
Quote:Nex pricing remains unchanged.
To be quite blunt I'm unhappy that NeX still exists period. I think its hands down the worst thing that CCP has ever done to Eve and is the mutant child of 18 months of neglect.
Quote:Yet from the triumphalist backslapping on this thread you would swear the CSM had actually achieved somthing tangible since July. Their own blogs prove that is not the case. CSM is being used as a firebreak between CCP and its customers, How the CSM or CCP can claim to be achieving anything when we are witnessing the largest decline in subsciptions and player numbers in eve memory?
Lets be realistic. At this point CSM has achieved nothing. Just like the player protests have currently achieved nothing. We are heading towards a decisive confrontation with an out of touch CCP management over resources for the core Eve experience. Until that fight begins and is won then nothing can be achieved really. This game is steering fearlessly towards an Iceburg and unless Hillmar can be convinced to alter course and fund the core game again in a serious fashion then any amount of re-arranging the deckchairs and furniture choices in a lounge is precisely irrelevant.
I think the CSM knows this and I think we know it.
But we should now be unified as comrades on the barricades preparing for the only fight that matters. Divisions and spite between CSM and players of all sides is now pointless.
We either get radically increased resources for Core Eve gameplay and a return to proper full content feature-rich expansions and genuine iteration on abandoned content or this game is going to sink with all hands.
The good people on the CSM are getting ready to fight. We need to get ready to fight too. There isn't going to be any prize for second place in this battle over resource priority.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Azelor Delaria
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming The 0rphanage
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 15:34:00 -
[375] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Communication is happening (am I not reporting on a meeting with CCP Zulu?) Return of functionality, I don't know what you're talking about, that wasn't part of the july meeting.
Yes, you mentioned a meeting with CCP Zulu. However, you neglect to mention what was talked about, citing the now-infamous NDA. I agree with a previous poster: all this appears to be is you guys attempting to score brownie point while not coming clean with what was said. And of course, we can expect you all to stick to your guns, continuing to cite the NDA.
It's quite interesting that at the end of the "emergency meeting", you guys could say exactly what you talked about. However, with this meeting, you can't say anything, because of the NDA? Seems like a small double standard so you guys don't have to say anything.
Protip: If you want to score brownie points, then say something useful. Otherwise, shut the hell up, because no one cares about vague posts. No one cares that you were on the CSM for upteen terms. In fact, I think you need to be removed the most because of how clearly incompetent you are.
Quote:Wider range of NeX price. I'm with you there, it's totally stupid of them, and I won't stop saying it until they introduce sensible pricing scheme. Until then they can stick their NeX someplace dark and smelly.
No, they need to remove the NeX until they actually do something for the game other than turn it into Barbie Playhouse.
Quote:The fact that the minutes are banal to you is a victory to us. The minutes are read by more than the jaded/sarcastic folks who frequent the forum, and what seems mundane to you may not seem so to people who don't spend time here. Not having had those meetings minute turned into marketing speech full of grandiose statements about awesomeness and fearlessness is a victory, whatever you may think.
The minutes don't matter, because as far as everyone is concerned, they are useless. A public transcript is what was expected, as has come before. As far as anyone is concerned, CCP could have redacted everything, put their words in your mouth., and told you to play along. Because once again, that NDA comes into play. "What the hell? That's not what we said!" BAMCIS! CCP claims you violated the NDA, you're gone.
In short, you're useless.
Quote:Ship spinning was agreed to return by CCP, yet if you read the minutes, it didn't say that it'd be returning *NOW*. Until then you're not forced into CQ.
Not the ship spinning we all love. In fact, they promised something similar, not ship spinning, per se.
Quote:Saving more than 50 ships was not part of the agenda.
So you can tell us what wasn't on the agenda, but not what was? Isn't this a violation of the NDA? |

Azelor Delaria
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming The 0rphanage
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 15:36:00 -
[376] - Quote
Quote:The CSM can claim to achieve things because it does, and what we do is not limited to the july meeting, look back a bit more (and look ahead too). The reason the july meeting happened is because of several things, one of which being CCP not having listened to us. Their realizing that is a victory too, for it is a requirement to them realizing they should do so in the future.
Oh, so you're saying the CSM gets to take credit when in reality, it was the far more than you morons who have done nothing? You piggybacked off the hard work of Helicity, Spank, and others, including myself. You claim you did something "historic" and that you have helped make the game better.
Where's the proof?
The July meeting would have happened even if you didn't chime in, because we - the players - said we had enough. Not CSM. You may be players as well, but you are a very small portion of the community. Never, ever forget that.
Quote:Pretty words mean nothing? Wait for the outcome and then judge.
Pretty words that make vague posts don't matter. Actions speak louder than words. And as far as I'm concerned, anything that happens at this point is because the playerbase has spoken, not the CSM.
Quote:And you should accept what we say because we've reporting things that were true all of the time for the past 3 years. That's why.
No, we shouldn't. When your defense is, "We're CSM, listen to what we say", there is no reason for us to listen.
In closing, the CSM - or rather, what the CSM should have been - is a noble idea. However, they seem to pick sheep that are easy to cow into doing what they want. As far as I'm concerned - and many others are as well, if we are to take posts in this thread for what they appear to be - you all are nothing but unpaid spokespeople to keep subscriptions. |

Arrynoss
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 15:39:00 -
[377] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:[quote=Temulkar Blaine]
Wall of Text....
Pretty much have to agree with every word said here.
I have been very defensive and have used CCP as the case study when nearly every other MMO company outside of Blizzard has got the development of their mmo's drastically wrong. This has led to catastrophic declines in subscribers and in the worst cases, the game shutting the doors.
I have found the content since Apocrypha to be rapidly falling into the category that tars so many other MMO's. Sadly, I cannot say that any of those that have chosen to ignore or sidestep their community and source of income are still maintaining a top shelf mmo.
Not last week I watched the video where Torfi first gave us the information on Tech III at Fanfest. It reminded me of how much the Apocrypha patch excited me. The room filled with loyal Eve players whooping, clapping and generally being over the moon at where the game was going.
I am a supporter of CCP's development cycle, providing us with the consistent larger updates on the seasonal markers however, I think they owe us this time to be more transparent with what is up and coming. This I trust is what Mittens and the CSM are going to press over the next meetings. Whilst the cloak and dagger development has been really good fun as an excited subscriber in the past; Incarna, Dominion et al have left the community betrayed.
Pending the conclusion of the CSM's meetings with Zulu and the high end CCP management, the community deserves at least in essence, a development plan of how the focus will be rebalanced to significantly increase the FiS output.
If CCP continues to run under NDA which we have been all tolerant and excitable for in the past, it simply provides more of a catalyst that CCP's inherent plans were set in stone to focus far too many resources into developing future games and neglecting the essence of Eve Online, which still remains an uncontested beacon in the Sci Fi MMO industry.
I personally, and I don't think many of us are asking for 100% direct transparency of CCP's 2 year plan here, however a new level and a one-off needs to be made once the CSM and CCP have concluded this spotlight. The community does not deserve to be left in the dark on this one, lest the game's decline could go from a substantial depression into absolute freefall.
I sincerely hope the CSM presses the right buttons and I fully support you in this. It goes to show how much Eve means to us all in more than just a passtime and a game. It's a sign of what we have all created that we all want to fight this hard to keep it.
|

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
152
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 15:57:00 -
[378] - Quote
Azelor Delaria wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Communication is happening (am I not reporting on a meeting with CCP Zulu?) Return of functionality, I don't know what you're talking about, that wasn't part of the july meeting. Yes, you mentioned a meeting with CCP Zulu. However, you neglect to mention what was talked about, citing the now-infamous NDA. I agree with a previous poster: all this appears to be is you guys attempting to score brownie point while not coming clean with what was said. And of course, we can expect you all to stick to your guns, continuing to cite the NDA. It's quite interesting that at the end of the "emergency meeting", you guys could say exactly what you talked about. However, with this meeting, you can't say anything, because of the NDA? Seems like a small double standard so you guys don't have to say anything. Protip: If you want to score brownie points, then say something useful. Otherwise, shut the hell up, because no one cares about vague posts. No one cares that you were on the CSM for upteen terms. In fact, I think you need to be removed the most because of how clearly incompetent you are.
You seem to be under the impression that we (the CSM) are the ones decidign what is under NDA and what isn't. That isn't the case. We could tell you what happened after the Emergency Summit because CCP allowed us to. We can't tell you what was said this time because they didn't allow us to say what happened this time.
If you don't want to know that we met with CCP, don't read the thread. Most people would prefer to have as much information as possible, which is what we have done. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Florestan Bronstein
United Engineering Services
49
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 16:09:00 -
[379] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote: (my stance being "either it makes sense to have more and the servers can handle it and you _give_ us more, or it doesn't and you don't, but you don't make me pay for core services"). that stance doesn't make any sense...
prices are a rationing mechanism used to determine the allocation of scarce resources (in this case resources on ccp's servers).
There is a lot of room between being able to give everyone - say - 100 server-side fitting slots and being unable to give anyone more than 50 slots.
And for pretty much any possible resource constraint there will be a AUR price that will make sure that demand does not exceed this constraint.
So instead of some people getting more fitting slots you reduce the choices to either everyone or nobody.
Don't really see how this is an improvement - now we end up with the "nobody" option while the "some" won't even get the slots they would be happy to pay for. Less utility for players, less money for CCP and this is better how? |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
250
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 16:11:00 -
[380] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:
Pretty words mean nothing? Wait for the outcome and then judge.
And you should accept what we say because we've reporting things that were true all of the time for the past 3 years. That's why.
All well and good, but how long should we wait? 18 Months, 6 Months, 3 Months? In the meantime we are still paying actual money to CCP while the only thing we get is vague promises and assurances even after the "rage". I won't pay my baker for bread he might make next week today. I won't buy milk from a cow that has not been born yet. I am not paying CCP any more for a game that might improve someday. I am sorry but I will only pay for red meat that's politly presented on a plate with some sauce and french fries and only then after I have eaten it.
I was going to make a post, but Ciar sums up what I was thinking. Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 16:15:00 -
[381] - Quote
Azelor Delaria wrote:
No, we shouldn't. When your defense is, "We're CSM, listen to what we say", there is no reason for us to listen.
.
Except that's the polar opposite of what he actually said. He said that you should look at the CSM's past record of telling the truth in order to judge their current truthfulness.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
250
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 16:18:00 -
[382] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Azelor Delaria wrote:
No, we shouldn't. When your defense is, "We're CSM, listen to what we say", there is no reason for us to listen.
.
Except that's the polar opposite of what he actually said. He said that you should look at the CSM's past record of telling the truth in order to judge their current truthfulness.
Yes, because The Mittani has such a reputation for honesty.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Sumos Tigerclaw
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 16:23:00 -
[383] - Quote
Deeds, not words. I wont believe anything CCP or the CSM says, and only half of what they do.
I feel like CCP has been running a scam on us for years. I also feel like I'm being griefed by goons who have taken over the CSM and CPP both. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
316
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 16:23:00 -
[384] - Quote
Azelor Delaria wrote: Oh, so you're saying the CSM gets to take credit when in reality, it was the far more than you morons who have done nothing? You piggybacked off the hard work of Helicity, Spank, and others, including myself. You claim you did something "historic" and that you have helped make the game better. Where's the proof?
I don't think anyone really believes the CSM has achieved anything "historic" at this point. Everything is still in the balance. The result of the "emergency summit" was overblown certainly but the fact that CCP didn't deliver a single thing really and the minutes showed they were defending their NeX scheme and still deluded into believing the Incarna CQ rollout was "smooth" just underpins this. So sure, the CSM is due some criticism for getting carried away and "played" by the CCP marketing zombies. But its a learning experience for them as well really. I hope they have learned their lesson and will be FAR tougher this time. The rhetoric coming out of the council recently seems to support this.
Quote:The July meeting would have happened even if you didn't chime in, because we - the players - said we had enough. Not CSM. You may be players as well, but you are a very small portion of the community. Never, ever forget that.
Sure but WE the players backed down as well on the emergency summit. I had a good idea what I wanted to see from the emergency summit and wasn't entirely happy with the outcome with no fixed timescales or commitments etc but I like thousands of others stopped rioting and decided to let CCP have some time to fix things. Well time went by and we'd taken our eyes off the ball a bit and CCP looked to be sliding back into the bad ways. The release of the emergency minutes showed just what pliable fools we'd been really (Players and CSM both).
So my point is we have some responsibility also for backing off the pressure when the fight had not been won - this is not solely the fault of the CSM.
Quote:In closing, the CSM - or rather, what the CSM should have been - is a noble idea. However, they seem to pick sheep that are easy to cow into doing what they want. As far as I'm concerned - and many others are as well, if we are to take posts in this thread for what they appear to be - you all are nothing but unpaid spokespeople to keep subscriptions.
Seriously - if they are sheep then they are sheep that we the players choose when we elect them. That is not a responsibility we can shirk either. But I don't think the CSM is sheep to be honest, I think they (like we) wanted to trust what CCP told them and believe that everything was going to be alright. They (like we) are now waking up to the reality that unless we all fight hard for this game we love then its going down the drain to the delusionary chants of mindless MT folly and critical under-resourcing of core gameplay.
Its time to fight for this game we love together and quit the backbiting.
CSM is just players like us at the end of the day. Players we elect. Players accountable to us.
Lets not forget that.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 16:44:00 -
[385] - Quote
Rodj Blake wrote:Malcanis wrote:Azelor Delaria wrote:
No, we shouldn't. When your defense is, "We're CSM, listen to what we say", there is no reason for us to listen.
.
Except that's the polar opposite of what he actually said. He said that you should look at the CSM's past record of telling the truth in order to judge their current truthfulness. Yes, because The Mittani has such a reputation for honesty.
So what's your theory? That mittens has hypnotised the other CSM members with his super mind-powers and now they agree with everything he says?
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

tika te
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 19:47:00 -
[386] - Quote
Quote:We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA.
all said; usless thread with more empty promises.. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 20:01:00 -
[387] - Quote
tika te wrote:Quote:We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA. all said; usless thread with more empty promises..
So what should they do? Have these meetings and then not bother telling anyone about it? Keep it a secret?
Why the hostility to them keeping us updated as they do the work they were elected for? I just don't understand it, unless it's a childish sulky "I want it all NOW!" reaction. Are people under the impression that the CSM can (or ought to be able to) Make Everything Better ForeverGäó in one meeting? Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
152
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 20:25:00 -
[388] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:tika te wrote:Quote:We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA. all said; usless thread with more empty promises.. So what should they do? Have these meetings and then not bother telling anyone about it? Keep it a secret? Why the hostility to them keeping us updated as they do the work they were elected for? I just don't understand it, unless it's a childish sulky "I want it all NOW!" reaction. Are people under the impression that the CSM can (or ought to be able to) Make Everything Better ForeverGäó in one meeting?
Uh, yes, they are.
I don't get the hostility either. Would you guys really rather we had said nothing at all? It doesn't seem to be clear to some folks that those are the two options. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
109
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 20:32:00 -
[389] - Quote
Two step wrote: Uh, yes, they are.
I don't get the hostility either. Would you guys really rather we had said nothing at all? It doesn't seem to be clear to some folks that those are the two options.
No we prefer if it you say something substantial
We have heared all the rest before, several times, it no longer impresses. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
316
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 20:38:00 -
[390] - Quote
Two step wrote:Malcanis wrote:tika te wrote:Quote:We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA. all said; usless thread with more empty promises.. So what should they do? Have these meetings and then not bother telling anyone about it? Keep it a secret? Why the hostility to them keeping us updated as they do the work they were elected for? I just don't understand it, unless it's a childish sulky "I want it all NOW!" reaction. Are people under the impression that the CSM can (or ought to be able to) Make Everything Better ForeverGäó in one meeting? Uh, yes, they are. I don't get the hostility either. Would you guys really rather we had said nothing at all? It doesn't seem to be clear to some folks that those are the two options.
Speaking personally I appreciate the communication and the efforts you guys have gone too - I know from experience that CSM done well is a time-consuming and exhausting business. Only thing I'd caution is don't let up on the pressure at this point - and don't take empty promises and pie in the sky "soon(tm)" status as anything of value - we need hard commitments and timescales and a radically-increased resource provision for the core game.
Keep up the pressure on CCP and I'll keep doing my part to support you.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |
|

Azelor Delaria
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming The 0rphanage
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 20:40:00 -
[391] - Quote
Two step wrote:Malcanis wrote:tika te wrote:Quote:We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA. all said; usless thread with more empty promises.. So what should they do? Have these meetings and then not bother telling anyone about it? Keep it a secret? Why the hostility to them keeping us updated as they do the work they were elected for? I just don't understand it, unless it's a childish sulky "I want it all NOW!" reaction. Are people under the impression that the CSM can (or ought to be able to) Make Everything Better ForeverGäó in one meeting? Uh, yes, they are. I don't get the hostility either. Would you guys really rather we had said nothing at all? It doesn't seem to be clear to some folks that those are the two options.
I, personally, would rather not know about some vague meeting in which you claim you brought up "several" things bothering the community-at-large, yet hide behind the NDA and say you can't tell us what was mentioned.
How is mentioning what you talked about with regards to what you claim are the "concerns" of those posting here NDA material? I mean, seriously. Did you guys talk about trade secrets? I think having a discussion - especially one where, and I'm quoting CCP Zulu on this:
CCP Zulu wrote:They are right in saying that nothing of detailed substance was said during the meeting--however there was apparently enough vague substance to convince them that the next meeting should be promising indeed.
If nothing of significant detail was talked about, then why does it fall under the NDA? My theory: our "concerns" were not talked about. I think it's a fair belief that you have not attempted to talk to CCP about our concerns, and instead brought to them your concerns.
But hey, what do I know? I wasn't there. I don't know what was talked about. And the NDA will just make sure none of us do, even in a week when you come back and say, "So this is what we talked about at this meeting, none of us can be sure it was talked about. Because the "public transcripts" became minutes when CCP realized they need to keep us shoveling out money. |

raker
Imperial Collective
13
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 20:43:00 -
[392] - Quote
Hehe
This is a no brainer
I was allied CinC in WWll Online, being such a high rank I had daily chats with game developers and of course I was told things that could not be passed on to the playerbase
Thier will always be ppl that will never be happy about NDA's, but they are standard
The point is that all the CSM have made it clear to CCP, that thier has been a lack of Fis content in the last expansions, CCP have reacted faster and thier has been a meeting
Now, I don't think for a moment that all the CSM would go back to the playerbase and "keep them quiet" , not when you look at the press releases that came from the CSM on this issue, esp mittani
CCP must of signalled some kind Fis expansion or at least part expansion to keep the CSM happy or I feel they would of just told the press that CCP aint playing ball and put more pressure on CCP
So, I know it suxs, but its just a case of wait and see, lets see what the winter expansion brings or what info CCP release
If it turns out that the CSM are full of S***, then they will pay the price at the next election and CCP will pay the price thro a further loss of subs
Its time to have some faith in the CSM, and wait and watch to see what CCP actually does
|

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 20:49:00 -
[393] - Quote
Two step wrote:Malcanis wrote:tika te wrote:Quote:We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA. all said; usless thread with more empty promises.. So what should they do? Have these meetings and then not bother telling anyone about it? Keep it a secret? Why the hostility to them keeping us updated as they do the work they were elected for? I just don't understand it, unless it's a childish sulky "I want it all NOW!" reaction. Are people under the impression that the CSM can (or ought to be able to) Make Everything Better ForeverGäó in one meeting? Uh, yes, they are. I don't get the hostility either. Would you guys really rather we had said nothing at all? It doesn't seem to be clear to some folks that those are the two options.
Then your completly missing the point arent you. This is not hostility its apathy and disillusion towards a process of blah blah that most people have absolutly no faith in. July achieved absolutly nothing. Comments like this CSM is going to achieve more than previous ones at this moment in time are as delusional as any $1000 dollar jeans comment.
If the CSM were doing such a great job at representing players disatisfaction and CCP were listening then sub numbers and players online wouldnt be dropping faster than a hookers panties.
Personally CSM would have been better served carrying on with this press campaign and keeping the pressure up rather than entering yet more meaningless dialogue! CSM only called you in to stop that campaign, who do you think is laughing into their rotten shark?
come back to the community with roadmaps, devblogs, dates, somthing tangible and youll get a better response. |

Azelor Delaria
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming The 0rphanage
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 20:58:00 -
[394] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:Then your completly missing the point arent you. This is not hostility its apathy and disillusion towards a process of blah blah that most people have absolutly no faith in. July achieved absolutly nothing. Comments like this CSM is going to achieve more than previous ones at this moment in time are as delusional as any $1000 dollar jeans comment.
If the CSM were doing such a great job at representing players disatisfaction and CCP were listening then sub numbers and players online wouldnt be dropping faster than a hookers panties.
Personally CSM would have been better served carrying on with this press campaign and keeping the pressure up rather than entering yet more meaningless dialogue! CSM only called you in to stop that campaign, who do you think is laughing into their rotten shark?
come back to the community with roadmaps, devblogs, dates, somthing tangible and youll get a better response.
This is a wise man.
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 21:06:00 -
[395] - Quote
Azelor Delaria wrote:Two step wrote:Malcanis wrote:tika te wrote:Quote:We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA. all said; usless thread with more empty promises.. So what should they do? Have these meetings and then not bother telling anyone about it? Keep it a secret? Why the hostility to them keeping us updated as they do the work they were elected for? I just don't understand it, unless it's a childish sulky "I want it all NOW!" reaction. Are people under the impression that the CSM can (or ought to be able to) Make Everything Better ForeverGäó in one meeting? Uh, yes, they are. I don't get the hostility either. Would you guys really rather we had said nothing at all? It doesn't seem to be clear to some folks that those are the two options. I, personally, would rather not know about some vague meeting in which you claim you brought up "several" things bothering the community-at-large, yet hide behind the NDA and say you can't tell us what was mentioned. How is mentioning what you talked about with regards to what you claim are the "concerns" of those posting here NDA material? I mean, seriously. Did you guys talk about trade secrets? I think having a discussion - especially one where, and I'm quoting CCP Zulu on this:
Well don't read the damb post then. Some of us do like to be kept informed of details; there's no one forcing you to read or care about minor updates if all you care about are the major updates.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Barbelo Valentinian
The Scope Gallente Federation
40
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 21:48:00 -
[396] - Quote
Sigras wrote:as I read this thread, I see more and more that there is nothing that will make you guys happy; I understand and think its reasonable that people are upset, i mean Im upset too, but I understand as a programmer and a gamer that things take time
I keep reading things like "patch notes or GTFO" and I ask myself what do you want them to do? materialize thousands of hours of play testing and code out of nowhere? Im also of the opinion that we'll wait and see what CCP comes up with but the operative word in that position is WAIT.
Id rather wait 3 months and see what CCP comes out with, then if they fail I have a legitimate reason for being pissed off. the problem with most of you is you wont remember this thread or your problems in 3 months.
This. I'm totally on the side of "CCP need to pull their finger out of their arse and set EVE to higher priority", but my god, when I read some of the asinine, bleating, whining comments on this thread ... |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
152
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 21:50:00 -
[397] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:Two step wrote: Uh, yes, they are.
I don't get the hostility either. Would you guys really rather we had said nothing at all? It doesn't seem to be clear to some folks that those are the two options.
No we prefer if it you say something substantialWe have heared all the rest before, several times, it no longer impresses.
As we all have said several times, that is *NOT* an option. We signed an agreement with CCP, we cannot make the details public without their permission. Your two options are: 1) We say nothing 2) We say what we did
There isn't some mythical 3rd choice here that we are not choosing to spite you. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 21:52:00 -
[398] - Quote
Two step wrote: There isn't some mythical 3rd choice here that we are not choosing to spite you.
Mittens hypnotised you into not disclosing the mythical 3rd choice just admit it
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
152
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 21:56:00 -
[399] - Quote
Azelor Delaria wrote:I, personally, would rather not know about some vague meeting in which you claim you brought up "several" things bothering the community-at-large, yet hide behind the NDA and say you can't tell us what was mentioned. How is mentioning what you talked about with regards to what you claim are the "concerns" of those posting here NDA material? I mean, seriously. Did you guys talk about trade secrets? I think having a discussion - especially one where, and I'm quoting CCP Zulu on this: CCP Zulu wrote:They are right in saying that nothing of detailed substance was said during the meeting--however there was apparently enough vague substance to convince them that the next meeting should be promising indeed.
Firstly, that isn't from Zulu, that is from CCP Manifest. Secondly, the NDA is not restricted to trade secrets only. You have mentioned this several times in this thread. Since you don't seem to be getting this, I will quote directly from the NDA:
CSM NDA wrote: Subject to the limitations set forth in Paragraph 2, all information disclosed to the other party shall be deemed to be "Proprietary Information." In particular, Proprietary Information shall be deemed to include any trade secret, marketing, servicing, financing or personnel matter relating to the disclosing party, its present or future products, sales or its business, the identity of any suppliers, clients, customers, business associates, employees or investors, whether in oral, written, graphic or electronic form.
Quote: If nothing of significant detail was talked about, then why does it fall under the NDA? My theory: our "concerns" were not talked about. I think it's a fair belief that you have not attempted to talk to CCP about our concerns, and instead brought to them your concerns.
But hey, what do I know? I wasn't there. I don't know what was talked about. And the NDA will just make sure none of us do, even in a week when you come back and say, "So this is what we talked about at this meeting, none of us can be sure it was talked about. Because the "public transcripts" became minutes when CCP realized they need to keep us shoveling out money.
The key word there is "detailed". Just because we didn't get into details doesn't mean it isn't covered by the NDA.
It seems clear to me at least that you have your own crazy conspiracy theories to uphold here, and aren't actually listening to what I am saying. You might try giving that a shot. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 21:59:00 -
[400] - Quote
There is hope in this tread i like it.
Power to the people on both sides(unfortunately) for making a start in the right direction imho. |
|

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
152
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 22:03:00 -
[401] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:Then your completly missing the point arent you. This is not hostility its apathy and disillusion towards a process of blah blah that most people have absolutly no faith in. July achieved absolutly nothing. Comments like this CSM is going to achieve more than previous ones at this moment in time are as delusional as any $1000 dollar jeans comment.
Wow, you sure do have a neat way of showing your apathy. I mean, shouldn't posting here be far too much effort for the truly apathetic?
Temulkar Blaine wrote: If the CSM were doing such a great job at representing players disatisfaction and CCP were listening then sub numbers and players online wouldnt be dropping faster than a hookers panties.
Bolded the important part for you. FFS, we took time off work and all got on planes with 5 days notice to represent you.
Temulkar Blaine wrote: Personally CSM would have been better served carrying on with this press campaign and keeping the pressure up rather than entering yet more meaningless dialogue! CSM only called you in to stop that campaign, who do you think is laughing into their rotten shark?
come back to the community with roadmaps, devblogs, dates, somthing tangible and youll get a better response.
All that stuff is the role of CCP, not the CSM. We have clearly articulated what our objective here is, which is to get CCP to devote more resources to FiS (a.k.a. EVE Online), and less to Incarna/WoD/DUST. This is a process, not something that can be solved in a single meeting. We have started that process, perhaps you might consider waiting for the results before you decide if we failed. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
152
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 22:04:00 -
[402] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Two step wrote: There isn't some mythical 3rd choice here that we are not choosing to spite you.
Mittens hypnotised you into not disclosing the mythical 3rd choice just admit it
Hmm, I don't remember anything, but I do have a strange craving for bacon... CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Trolls Troll
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 22:04:00 -
[403] - Quote
Two step wrote:, and aren't actually listening to what I am saying. You might try giving that a shot.
LIKE WHEN WE LISTENED TO ZULU AND MITTENS 3 MONTHS AGO IN THE VIDEOS SAYING HOW EVERYTHING WAS OK????????????
WHAT YOU DO CSM, NOT WHAT YOU SAY
UNLESS OF COURSE THE 4TH ALTERNATE CSM KNOWS MORE THAN THE SENIOR PRODUCER OF EVE AND CHAIRMAN OF CSM? |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 22:21:00 -
[404] - Quote
Two step wrote: We have started that process, perhaps you might consider waiting for the results before you decide if we failed.
And who knows, if he really wanted all that stuff to happen, he might even consider supporting the CSM rather than actively undermining it as vigorously as he could.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 22:22:00 -
[405] - Quote
Two step wrote:Malcanis wrote:Two step wrote: There isn't some mythical 3rd choice here that we are not choosing to spite you.
Mittens hypnotised you into not disclosing the mythical 3rd choice just admit it Hmm, I don't remember anything, but I do have a strange craving for bacon...
*handwave*
These are not the -droids- proposals you're looking for!
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 22:26:00 -
[406] - Quote
Two step wrote:[quote=Azelor Delaria]
It seems clear to me at least that you have your own crazy conspiracy theories to uphold here, and aren't actually listening to what I am saying. You might try giving that a shot.
Dont accuse me of tinfoil hattery!
It is not a crazy conspiracy to state that the july meeting achieved absolutly nothing. No change in mindset or direction from CCP. It was an abject failure.
It is certainly not a crazy conspircacy to suggest you are being used as a fire break or shall I put it to you in CCP speak to "manage players expectations"
Rather than getting uber defensive why dont you simply listen to us the people whose concerns are driving this in the first place.
You seem to be palpably incapable of understanding a lot of what has been said in this thread. The process was proven fundementally flawed in july and the debacle surrounding the minutes. All you are giving the community is more of the same flawed process.
the only thing CCP listen to is action. Whether that action is to blog in teh gaming press and post here or whether it is to unsubscribe. CSM at least had that strategy right it seems CCP had their strategy right in how to stop you. Rinse and repeat. |

Trolls Troll
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 22:30:00 -
[407] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:Two step wrote:[quote=Azelor Delaria]
It seems clear to me at least that you have your own crazy conspiracy theories to uphold here, and aren't actually listening to what I am saying. You might try giving that a shot.
Dont accuse me of tinfoil hattery! It is not a crazy conspiracy to state that the july meeting achieved absolutly nothing. No change in mindset or direction from CCP. It was an abject failure. It is certainly not a crazy conspircacy to suggest you are being used as a fire break or shall I put it to you in CCP speak to "manage players expectations" Rather than getting uber defensive why dont you simply listen to us the people whose concerns are driving this in the first place. You seem to be palpably incapable of understanding a lot of what has been said in this thread. The process was proven fundementally flawed in july and the debacle surrounding the minutes. All you are giving the community is more of the same flawed process. the only thing CCP listen to is action. Whether that action is to blog in teh gaming press and post here or whether it is to unsubscribe. CSM at least had that strategy right it seems CCP had their strategy right in how to stop you. Rinse and repeat.
Yeah I like how it was "only a goonswarm internal mail from mittens" TO
Mittens > "I didn't do anything all these gaming sites managed to find my Kugu post TO
CSM > "We started a campaign against CCP by going to the media sites, and look how effective it was, now CCP wanna talk"
 |

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 22:32:00 -
[408] - Quote
Two step wrote:[quote=Temulkar Blaine] Wow, you sure do have a neat way of showing your apathy. I mean, shouldn't posting here be far too much effort for the truly apathetic?
.
Ah your not actually grasping the meaning of that sentence are you. I am apathetic toewards a process of dialogue with CCP that has proven to be completly ineffective in the past. I am disillusioned by the complete lack of change in direction that has been effected by these "meetings"
That does not mean I dont care about the game or want to see it survive nor am I apathetic about that. simple enough for you? |

BoneEater
Capitalist Pig Running Dogs
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 22:47:00 -
[409] - Quote
Dont post often, but read alot. Thanks for the update, even if CCP tied your hands on what you could say. See if you can get to allow you to release at least a list of subjects discused, even if only in hypotheical unrelaistic ways. That way with that simple no details list you can give the whiners on this forum some "details" and still keep anything that CCP will do in the future as unknown as it is now. Only revealing really that something was mentioned on the topic.
I understand that this is out of your hands, but really just direct a few of their devs this way to read how much ppl want some details and they should at least allow a partial list then. If not I dont think they have "Got" that communications error fixed from the summer  |

Revalyn
Impact Theory
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 22:55:00 -
[410] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Hello Everyone,
......................During that meeting, we discussed the players' concerns with the man who has the ability to resolve them. We cannot share the details of the meeting itself because it is heavily NDA'd, but ways to resolve your concerns have been discussed and a follow-up meeting is planned.
Stay tuned...
Meissa Anunthiel, Vice-Chairman of CSM 6
The NDA says it all really. The CSM delivered what we expected from the meeting, nothing, and as for staying tuned- the TV picture is all fuzzy so we switch to another channel. |
|

Tengillar Scott
Tengillar Scott Corp
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 23:07:00 -
[411] - Quote
What makes me sad, is all the time CCP is putting in to Dust. If they where going to released it on the PC as well as consoles, then it might do rather well. But they are putting it on console only, up against COD and BF.
Thay need to focus on what made them big and that is EVE. Pulling people from EVE and putting them on Dust, could have the effect of not only Dust failing but players leaving EVE. If they do not get that soon, i guess we can expect EVE to go "free to play" in a year.
Im really disappointed in the vision CCP have given us. Most of all im bitter about Dust not getting a PC release for some idiotic reason.
Well don-¦t mind me... ill go mine a roid and make me a micro warp drive. Ye that will cheer me up. |

Alz Shado
EverFlow
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 23:26:00 -
[412] - Quote
I, for one, can't wait to play Planetside!
What, that's not the Sony 3D FPS MMORPG with a persistent worldstate that talks to eve?
Oh, well. |

Azelor Delaria
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming The 0rphanage
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 02:50:00 -
[413] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:Two step wrote:[quote=Azelor Delaria]
It seems clear to me at least that you have your own crazy conspiracy theories to uphold here, and aren't actually listening to what I am saying. You might try giving that a shot.
Dont accuse me of tinfoil hattery! It is not a crazy conspiracy to state that the july meeting achieved absolutly nothing. No change in mindset or direction from CCP. It was an abject failure. It is certainly not a crazy conspircacy to suggest you are being used as a fire break or shall I put it to you in CCP speak to "manage players expectations" Rather than getting uber defensive why dont you simply listen to us the people whose concerns are driving this in the first place. You seem to be palpably incapable of understanding a lot of what has been said in this thread. The process was proven fundementally flawed in july and the debacle surrounding the minutes. All you are giving the community is more of the same flawed process. the only thing CCP listen to is action. Whether that action is to blog in teh gaming press and post here or whether it is to unsubscribe. CSM at least had that strategy right it seems CCP had their strategy right in how to stop you. Rinse and repeat.
This many pretty much sums up my feelings on the matter rather succinctly.
I was on your side in July, if you remember. I was one of the somewhat vocal members of the community saying, "Go get 'em, CSM!". I put my hopes for this game squarely on your shoulders, because you asked me to. It wasn't blind faith at the time, because everything you all said, I supported.
Once late July hit and there wasn't anything significant to show a change in CCP's direction and thinking, I began to realize that maybe the CSM didn't do the job they had agreed to do. I understand that compromise must be done in order to maintain cordial relations with both groups. However, you capitulating on pretty much everything was significant in determining that maybe it was a poor choice on our part.
As I said - and the quoted post says - you need to show us that you are achieving results, because at the moment, CCP is not showing that. And just because someone is holding your feet to the fire doesn't mean that they don't support you. If you get results, I support you. If you don't, then you are useless. It's that simple. |

MailDeadDrop
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 02:54:00 -
[414] - Quote
Two step wrote:As we all have said several times, that is *NOT* an option. We signed an agreement with CCP, we cannot make the details public without their permission. Your two options are: 1) We say nothing 2) We say what we did
There isn't some mythical 3rd choice here that we are not choosing to spite you. As one of the earlier ones to take the CSM to task on this subject, I'll give you my answer: 1. Say nothing. This is a corollary to the old saw about "if you can't say something nice about someone, say nothing at all." In this case it's more "if you can't say something substantive to the playerbase, say nothing at all."
"Why?" (or rather "Why not?") Because it only causes the playerbase to get all spun up, and only supports your (the CSM's) appearance of self-serving "we're so important".
Conclusion: nothing good comes of it, so STFU until you have something of substance.
Edit: "STFU" may have the desirable effect of causing the CSM to push CCP for more open communication. Reasoning: CSM's all want to be able to talk and say "we did ____". If they can't say anything when they can't be substantive, then they'll push CCP to let more substance be communicated.
MDD |

MailDeadDrop
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 03:01:00 -
[415] - Quote
Two step wrote:This is a process, not something that can be solved in a single meeting. We have started that process, perhaps you might consider waiting for the results before you decide if we failed. Waiting months after the emergency summit to "start the process" is a failure itself. What message should the playerbase take from CCP's apparent inaction during the intervening 3 months?
MDD |

Crexa
Star Mandate
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 03:34:00 -
[416] - Quote
London wrote:Crexa wrote:London wrote:Dudes, this is what's happening for FiS this winter: MMORPG.com interviewIt sounds like a really impressive laundry list of features and balances, everything this bitter Eve player could hope for. :P You can't be serious. Yes I agree that what is mentioned in this article is good news, but an expansion it does not make. Where is the meat? I see a lot of salad and gravy but no meat. 3 new CQs is something, but not meat, weve seen one, are you seriously going to be impressed longer than 2 minutes with each of the new ones? And an "establishment"? really? How about an open station to walk around in? The ability to interact with others? Huge view of space from inside the station like some of the dramatic images weve seen. How about new regions? New ships? New modules? How about bringing back minefields to counter Supers, or new weapon systems for dreads to counter them? How about access finally to Jove space, they have been fricken building up to that forever. So all I say is where is the MEAT? I'm paying more attention to this part, why are you so focused on CQ? "One of the main goals of the expansion is to enhance the smaller skirmishes in EVE, and make them a larger part of the game as opposed to the epic and massive wars the game has become known for. The team wants to incentivize skirmishes and give a role to the other lesser-used ships and give smaller groups of players more ways to feel important in the game. The first step will be to look at the gameGÇÖs current caps, and theyGÇÖre definitely going to be buffing Dreads, while nerfing the Super Carriers a bit. TheyGÇÖre going to also take long hard looks at frigates, cruisers, and other smaller ships to give them a more effective role in the overall scheme of things." I long for ship and weapon balance, not CQ...
I wasn't intentionally fixiating on the CQ's as I don't really care about those. What I'm looking for is EXPANSION! What your looking forward to is fantastic, don't get me wrong I want that too. But it is tinkering or tweaking. Something that belongs in a patch not a supposed "expansion". |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
63
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 04:10:00 -
[417] - Quote
Crexa wrote:London wrote:Crexa wrote:London wrote:Dudes, this is what's happening for FiS this winter: MMORPG.com interviewIt sounds like a really impressive laundry list of features and balances, everything this bitter Eve player could hope for. :P You can't be serious. Yes I agree that what is mentioned in this article is good news, but an expansion it does not make. Where is the meat? I see a lot of salad and gravy but no meat. 3 new CQs is something, but not meat, weve seen one, are you seriously going to be impressed longer than 2 minutes with each of the new ones? And an "establishment"? really? How about an open station to walk around in? The ability to interact with others? Huge view of space from inside the station like some of the dramatic images weve seen. How about new regions? New ships? New modules? How about bringing back minefields to counter Supers, or new weapon systems for dreads to counter them? How about access finally to Jove space, they have been fricken building up to that forever. So all I say is where is the MEAT? I'm paying more attention to this part, why are you so focused on CQ? "One of the main goals of the expansion is to enhance the smaller skirmishes in EVE, and make them a larger part of the game as opposed to the epic and massive wars the game has become known for. The team wants to incentivize skirmishes and give a role to the other lesser-used ships and give smaller groups of players more ways to feel important in the game. The first step will be to look at the gameGÇÖs current caps, and theyGÇÖre definitely going to be buffing Dreads, while nerfing the Super Carriers a bit. TheyGÇÖre going to also take long hard looks at frigates, cruisers, and other smaller ships to give them a more effective role in the overall scheme of things." I long for ship and weapon balance, not CQ... I wasn't intentionally fixiating on the CQ's as I don't really care about those. What I'm looking for is EXPANSION! What your looking forward to is fantastic, don't get me wrong I want that too. But it is tinkering or tweaking. Something that belongs in a patch not a supposed "expansion". The focus on EXPANSION is what has caused all the craptastic features, and half finished things to do. Your going for an ideal, when what most mmos gamers expect as basic support for the game isn't even being provided. o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Vaako Horizon
Casual Slackers Daily Operations
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 07:06:00 -
[418] - Quote
Two step wrote:Temulkar Blaine wrote:Then your completly missing the point arent you. This is not hostility its apathy and disillusion towards a process of blah blah that most people have absolutly no faith in. July achieved absolutly nothing. Comments like this CSM is going to achieve more than previous ones at this moment in time are as delusional as any $1000 dollar jeans comment.
Wow, you sure do have a neat way of showing your apathy. I mean, shouldn't posting here be far too much effort for the truly apathetic? Temulkar Blaine wrote: If the CSM were doing such a great job at representing players disatisfaction and CCP were listening then sub numbers and players online wouldnt be dropping faster than a hookers panties.
Bolded the important part for you. FFS, we took time off work and all got on planes with 5 days notice to represent you. Temulkar Blaine wrote: Personally CSM would have been better served carrying on with this press campaign and keeping the pressure up rather than entering yet more meaningless dialogue! CSM only called you in to stop that campaign, who do you think is laughing into their rotten shark?
come back to the community with roadmaps, devblogs, dates, somthing tangible and youll get a better response.
All that stuff is the role of CCP, not the CSM. We have clearly articulated what our objective here is, which is to get CCP to devote more resources to FiS (a.k.a. EVE Online), and less to Incarna/WoD/DUST. This is a process, not something that can be solved in a single meeting. We have started that process, perhaps you might consider waiting for the results before you decide if we failed.
"Bolded the important part for you. FFS, we took time off work and all got on planes with 5 days notice to represent you." ??
BS!! you did not and have not been representing us in any way, shape or form. You wont ever represet the player base until you get atleast 50% of the players to vote. What you have done is represent yourselves and a small minority ( the few that voted and even then its less then that ) + We havent seen you done anything but talk yet... ( and 50% of the talks we arent even allowed to see :P ) |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 07:32:00 -
[419] - Quote
Did you vote?
And what else should the CSM do but talk to CCP? Do you think that they should sneak in to the building and code in some features in a daring midnight operation? What timescales are you expecting the CSM to work and elicit results on? Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

DeBingJos
T.R.I.A.D
90
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 07:42:00 -
[420] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Did you vote?
And what else should the CSM do but talk to CCP? Do you think that they should sneak in to the building and code in some features in a daring midnight operation? What timescales are you expecting the CSM to work and elicit results on?
^^ this
People that don't vote have no right to complain. Period. Fix FW ! |
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 07:55:00 -
[421] - Quote
DeBingJos wrote:Malcanis wrote:Did you vote?
And what else should the CSM do but talk to CCP? Do you think that they should sneak in to the building and code in some features in a daring midnight operation? What timescales are you expecting the CSM to work and elicit results on? ^^ this People that don't vote have no right to complain. Period.
They have a right to complain, but they don't have much of a case to be taken seriously. Especially when they're so hugely unrealistic and entitled.
Is it necessary that the CSM sign an NDA in order to fully function? Yes, obviously. Have individuals CCP abused the NDA in a (futile) attempt to spare themselves embarrassment? Again, obviously
So what can the CSM do about it? They should certainly have idscussion about the NDA with CCP, and get a better process implemented. The point should be strongly made that using the NDA to cover up embarassing discussions does nothing but exacerbate the situation and is in any case ultimately futile. Fuckups remain fuckups whether or not the CSM are allowed to publish the "We asked CCP how the hell they ****** this up so badly" minutes.
They might be able to do things like propose that the NDA system be reformed, for example with shorter durations for less sensitive items, and more rational NDA expiry times (eg: CCP plan to make Thullium into the "new Technetium", the bottleneck material in T2 production. Obviously, market sensitive data like this need to be NDA'd, but once the change goes live, there is no longer a need to NDA any discussion about it.
Another example might be to note who exactly in CCP requested that a specific discussion be NDA'd, so that there is an accountability chain if the NDA process is abused: "The CSM questioned CCP about $_GIGANTIC_MISTAKE, but the details were NDA'd at the request of CCP Herpaderpa and CCP Fecalcranium"
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
195
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 07:56:00 -
[422] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Did you vote?
And what else should the CSM do but talk to CCP? Do you think that they should sneak in to the building and code in some features in a daring midnight operation? What timescales are you expecting the CSM to work and elicit results on?
This is actually very tempting... I'll see how doable that is in December, maybe I'll booze up some devs and use their workstations while they're passed out on the floor ;-) Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
63
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 07:59:00 -
[423] - Quote
Time for a 'Vote or Die' campaign?
Where is Helicity Bosun.... o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Checkin theprices
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 08:37:00 -
[424] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Basileus Volkan wrote:Arrogance is usually only seen as such from below.
Ones personal feelings towards a political figure do not determine their competence. In fact, as far as I am aware, the current CSM has done a lot more than the previous ones. That's a bit of a side issue, but one that bears repeating. Having been on all those pasts CSMs (except the first), I am in a very good position to tell you that while the quality of elected members has overall increased, the major progress in terms of ability to accomplish things is because the CSM-CCP process has strongly evolved. Practical examples: During CSM 2, communication between CSM and CCP was limited to exactly 1 summit in Iceland and 1 brainstorming session with CCP Abathur and CCP Greyscale. No "pre-meeting", no post-meeting, nothing. Something CSM 2 fought to change. During CSM 3, communication between CSM and CCP was limited to 1 iceland summit and 2 online meetings. During CSM 4, we got the stakeholder status that allowed us to fight for the inclusion of "our" items in the release plan (the list of stuff includded in an expansion), before that it was up to devs to pick stuff from our list if they chose to. During CSM 5, communication was extended to a lot of forum dialog with the devs (the private CSM forum was only used by CSM members before that). We got devs to start poking us about requests that they have while they were developping stuff. So far, during CSM 6, we got a few of the key devs (or just cool devs) to hang out with us in a skype channel where a lot of discussions can take place, in addition to an increased dev presence on the forums. The CSM is only as good as its capacity to engage the devs in dialog and give them feedback. Each CSM has added more communication abilities on top of what its predecessor already had, it should therefore come as no surprise that each CSM is able to accomplish more. Also, while initially many devs were very cautious about the CSM ("who the hell are these players hanging about in the office"), over the terms they've come to accept us as a good feedback tool. We're only as good as CCP's willingness to use us (I think I'll forever have CSM 3 Zastrow's "but please use us as cheap hookers" request in my mind :p) So, yes, CSM 6 looks set to do a better job than CSM 5, but not as a question of effort on the part of previous CSMs.
So in other words, as the CSM AND players have consistently been getting more of a say in the development of this game, the faster it has turned to dogshit. Not surprising, but the players are the problem.
CCP: Make YOUR game. That's what you did before the CSM. That's the game everyone wants back. |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
195
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 09:03:00 -
[425] - Quote
Checkin theprices wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Basileus Volkan wrote:Arrogance is usually only seen as such from below.
Ones personal feelings towards a political figure do not determine their competence. In fact, as far as I am aware, the current CSM has done a lot more than the previous ones. That's a bit of a side issue, but one that bears repeating. Having been on all those pasts CSMs (except the first), I am in a very good position to tell you that while the quality of elected members has overall increased, the major progress in terms of ability to accomplish things is because the CSM-CCP process has strongly evolved. Practical examples: During CSM 2, communication between CSM and CCP was limited to exactly 1 summit in Iceland and 1 brainstorming session with CCP Abathur and CCP Greyscale. No "pre-meeting", no post-meeting, nothing. Something CSM 2 fought to change. During CSM 3, communication between CSM and CCP was limited to 1 iceland summit and 2 online meetings. During CSM 4, we got the stakeholder status that allowed us to fight for the inclusion of "our" items in the release plan (the list of stuff includded in an expansion), before that it was up to devs to pick stuff from our list if they chose to. During CSM 5, communication was extended to a lot of forum dialog with the devs (the private CSM forum was only used by CSM members before that). We got devs to start poking us about requests that they have while they were developping stuff. So far, during CSM 6, we got a few of the key devs (or just cool devs) to hang out with us in a skype channel where a lot of discussions can take place, in addition to an increased dev presence on the forums. The CSM is only as good as its capacity to engage the devs in dialog and give them feedback. Each CSM has added more communication abilities on top of what its predecessor already had, it should therefore come as no surprise that each CSM is able to accomplish more. Also, while initially many devs were very cautious about the CSM ("who the hell are these players hanging about in the office"), over the terms they've come to accept us as a good feedback tool. We're only as good as CCP's willingness to use us (I think I'll forever have CSM 3 Zastrow's "but please use us as cheap hookers" request in my mind :p) So, yes, CSM 6 looks set to do a better job than CSM 5, but not as a question of effort on the part of previous CSMs. So in other words, as the CSM AND players have consistently been getting more of a say in the development of this game, the faster it has turned to dogshit. Not surprising, but the players are the problem. CCP: Make YOUR game. That's what you did before the CSM. That's the game everyone wants back.
Correlation does not imply causation. Get some logic classes.
If at the same time as we get more say on what gets made on the FiS front (read my previous post on the subject), we get saddled with the majority of the available resources allocated to dollies, you can't assume that our say has caused the game to grow worse.
Not only that, but I would agree that it is important the CSM doesn't dictate fully what gets done (see that same linked post).
Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 10:33:00 -
[426] - Quote
"CSM 6 looks set to do a better job than CSM 5, but not as a question of effort on the part of previous CSMs."
Statements like this are utterly inapropriate at this point in time. It is hubris on a grand scale to suggest success when eve is in its current state. It is completly disingenuous to suggest you are doing a good job given the results that we have at the moment which amount to absolutly nothing.
Since you were made fools of by CCP in July, I would save the triumphalism until you actually deliver somthing.
At the moment CSM has not effected any change to CCP strategy or plans in the areas that have concerned the community since the release of incarna in June.
The CSM hide behind the NDA like a shield. In this very thread when faced with pertinent questions about tangible results they either start personal attacks or attempt sarcasm (badly).
The CSM is not an elected parliament they are not your direct representitives, they have no power to effect change. The CSM are a talking shop that are being increasingly used by CCP to deflect player crticism and anger whilst effecting no change.
The fact this CSM is so puffed up with self importance about the great job they are doing is astounding given the current state of the game and relations between the players and CCP. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
250
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 10:34:00 -
[427] - Quote
Checkin theprices wrote:
So in other words, as the CSM AND players have consistently been getting more of a say in the development of this game, the faster it has turned to dogshit. Not surprising, but the players are the problem.
CCP: Make YOUR game. That's what you did before the CSM. That's the game everyone wants back.
As a player of the game, I do not feel as though I've had more of a say in recent times.
Of course, the vested interests in 0.0 powerblocs will probably disagree with me. Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Vaako Horizon
Casual Slackers Daily Operations
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 10:42:00 -
[428] - Quote
I did vote but from the start I was aware that it whould not make any difference...
|

azurisk
Space Tech Innovations S.T.C.
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 11:00:00 -
[429] - Quote
Two step wrote:
Bolded the important part for you. FFS, we took time off work and all got on planes with 5 days notice to represent you.
Made me lol. |

DeBingJos
T.R.I.A.D
90
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 11:20:00 -
[430] - Quote
azurisk wrote:Two step wrote:
Bolded the important part for you. FFS, we took time off work and all got on planes with 5 days notice to represent you.
Made me lol.
It made you lol? Can you take some days off from work at a moments notice to travel half way around the world to represent the playerbase of a computer game?
How about explaining this to your family? I'm pretty sure my boss an girlfriend would not be amused!
Fix FW ! |
|

azurisk
Space Tech Innovations S.T.C.
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 11:22:00 -
[431] - Quote
DeBingJos wrote:azurisk wrote:Two step wrote:
Bolded the important part for you. FFS, we took time off work and all got on planes with 5 days notice to represent you.
Made me lol. It made you lol? Can you take some days off from work at a moments notice to travel half way around the world to represent the playerbase of a computer game? How about explaining this to your family? I'm pretty sure my boss an girlfriend would not be amused!
Then do not run for CSM. Easy as that, i bet the people who are on the CSM would think it's great. If not, they should GTFO. |

DeBingJos
T.R.I.A.D
90
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 11:26:00 -
[432] - Quote
azurisk wrote: Then do not run for CSM. Easy as that, i bet the people who are on the CSM would think it's great. If not, they should GTFO.
They were never told that they had to leave to Iceland at a moments notice, this is not a normal part of the CSM job.
Fix FW ! |

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 11:39:00 -
[433] - Quote
Look nobody in their right mind is decrying the efforts of the CSM. I certainly appreciate the fact they took time out of their lives to go to Iceland and try to improve this game.
Two step gets uber defensive claiming the fact that they went to the summit should be applauded. It should be.
However, the point of my initial comment that two step was responding to was that CCP did not listen in July. The july summit was an abject failure. The process of communicating with CCP was proven to be fundementally flawed. There have been no improvemets in direction attitude or communication between the players and CCP since that meeting.
I reiterate the CSM is not a paliament it is a talking shop. Unfortunatly some of this CSM seem to be convinced they have more power or authority than they really have.
As for utterly ridiculous statements like people who dont vote cant complain. This is not a democratic nation, power is not derived from the electorate power is in the hands of a game manufacturer. If you play the game you have a right to complain about it and a right not to pay for a substandard product if that is your choice.
And I did vote in the election by the way. |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
195
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 11:45:00 -
[434] - Quote
azurisk wrote:DeBingJos wrote:azurisk wrote:Two step wrote:
Bolded the important part for you. FFS, we took time off work and all got on planes with 5 days notice to represent you.
Made me lol. It made you lol? Can you take some days off from work at a moments notice to travel half way around the world to represent the playerbase of a computer game? How about explaining this to your family? I'm pretty sure my boss an girlfriend would not be amused! Then do not run for CSM. Easy as that, i bet the people who are on the CSM would think it's great. If not, they should GTFO.
Frankly, while going to the regular icelandic meeting is fine (they're a lot of work, but that's what we signed up for, so no complaining), having to go on that surprise meeting was not fun.
First it wasn't an enjoyable subject. Forums are aflame, NeX sucked, then the leaks. Even though we do get along really well with the devs, those are meetings were we lay aside the comradrie, don the "what the F have you done" suit and spend days having strong words against people we otherwise appreciate. 2 days of tense meetings trying to unscrew the situation... All of the time outside of meetings was spent talking about that and that only.
In addition, it's really short notice, many of us were working, telling our employers "sorry boss, have to go to Iceland for internet spaceships" was not exactly the most desirable situation. I'm personally lucky enough to have included the "if I have to go to iceland, you have to let me go" bit as part of my contract negociations with my employer, but for most it meant unpaid leave off work.
So, in that one instance, serious internet business in Iceland downright sucked. Argue all you want about the merits and accomplishments and purpose of the CSM if you want, but that bit was *effort* plain and simple. Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

ISquishWorms
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 11:45:00 -
[435] - Quote
Two step wrote:
Bolded the important part for you. FFS, we took time off work and all got on planes with 5 days notice to represent you.
Well I am grateful, thank you CSM.
I did not vote for the current CSM, I either missed the voting or I was not playing at the time as I did take a long break from the game, but I am thankful for what they do. I believe that whilst they may not always achieve what we as individuals want (we probably are all after slightly different outcomes) they try their best to represent us as a group and do what they can within the various constraints placed upon them. I do not understand those that complain. If you think you can do a better job and they are not doing it to your satisfaction then why not put yourself forward for the next CSM vote. |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
195
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 11:53:00 -
[436] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:Look nobody in their right mind is decrying the efforts of the CSM. I certainly appreciate the fact they took time out of their lives to go to Iceland and try to improve this game.
Two step gets uber defensive claiming the fact that they went to the summit should be applauded. It should be.
However, the point of my initial comment that two step was responding to was that CCP did not listen in July. The july summit was an abject failure. The process of communicating with CCP was proven to be fundementally flawed. There have been no improvemets in direction attitude or communication between the players and CCP since that meeting.
I reiterate the CSM is not a paliament it is a talking shop. Unfortunatly some of this CSM seem to be convinced they have more power or authority than they really have.
As for utterly ridiculous statements like people who dont vote cant complain. This is not a democratic nation, power is not derived from the electorate power is in the hands of a game manufacturer. If you play the game you have a right to complain about it and a right not to pay for a substandard product if that is your choice.
And I did vote in the election by the way.
CSM is a democratically elected body tasked with interacting with devs. The only authority we have is that given to us by you and CCP, collectively. The powers we have are byproducts of that. If we talk with devs and tell you "they're going to **** something up big time", you'll rage. If we talk to the devs and they tell us "they're fixing this", even though you (collective) may not see the results directly, you see the direction.
Statements made by the CSM to the public, if not respected induce :rage: and threadnoughts as a result. So it's indirect power, but it's power still.
Oh, and people who don't vote have every right to complain if they so want, and they have the same power we have. It just takes many more of non-voters to achieve the same result than having someone represent you can. Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
109
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 12:05:00 -
[437] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote: CSM is a democratically elected body tasked with interacting with devs. The only authority we have is that given to us by you and CCP, collectively. The powers we have are byproducts of that. If we talk with devs and tell you "they're going to **** something up big time", you'll rage. If we talk to the devs and they tell us "they're fixing this", even though you (collective) may not see the results directly, you see the direction.
Statements made by the CSM to the public, if not respected induce :rage: and threadnoughts as a result. So it's indirect power, but it's power still.
Oh, and people who don't vote have every right to complain if they so want, and they have the same power we have. It just takes many more of non-voters to achieve the same result than having someone represent you can.
While I respect the CSM for what they have been doing and support their actions now it is important to note that barely 15% of players actually voted for the CSM (I believe it was closer to 13%?). I did vote for a CSM I voted for got kicked due to something mysterious involving the NDA I never bothered finding out.
The fact that CCP again fails utterly in communicating to its p(l)ayerbase is unsurprising. How are the arangements between Zulu and the CSM regarding a follow up meeting progressing btw. Now that the media pressure is no longer there?
- [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 12:14:00 -
[438] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Temulkar Blaine wrote:Look nobody in their right mind is decrying the efforts of the CSM. I certainly appreciate the fact they took time out of their lives to go to Iceland and try to improve this game.
Two step gets uber defensive claiming the fact that they went to the summit should be applauded. It should be.
However, the point of my initial comment that two step was responding to was that CCP did not listen in July. The july summit was an abject failure. The process of communicating with CCP was proven to be fundementally flawed. There have been no improvemets in direction attitude or communication between the players and CCP since that meeting.
I reiterate the CSM is not a paliament it is a talking shop. Unfortunatly some of this CSM seem to be convinced they have more power or authority than they really have.
As for utterly ridiculous statements like people who dont vote cant complain. This is not a democratic nation, power is not derived from the electorate power is in the hands of a game manufacturer. If you play the game you have a right to complain about it and a right not to pay for a substandard product if that is your choice.
And I did vote in the election by the way. CSM is a democratically elected body tasked with interacting with devs. The only authority we have is that given to us by you and CCP, collectively. The powers we have are byproducts of that. If we talk with devs and tell you "they're going to **** something up big time", you'll rage. If we talk to the devs and they tell us "they're fixing this", even though you (collective) may not see the results directly, you see the direction. Statements made by the CSM to the public, if not respected induce :rage: and threadnoughts as a result. So it's indirect power, but it's power still. Oh, and people who don't vote have every right to complain if they so want, and they have the same power we have. It just takes many more of non-voters to achieve the same result than having someone represent you can.
You are not democratically elected you are elected by democratic process there is a significant difference.
You have no power. You can only effect change if CCP listens to you as pointed out by two step. YOu have no executive decision makers, there is no accountability to the electorate, Your mandate is derived from less than 10% of the game population, not from a popular vote.
You are a talking shop that CCP can choose to take account of or can dismiss and ignore when they so choose. You have no electoral power imbued in the CSM as a body to change that.
You may have dignitas and authority from your position as community leaders, Im sure the goons respect mittens after all but dont mistake that for actual power within a game company. The power in a busuness resides with the owners and investors of that businness not with workers committees or customer satisfaction think tanks.
You do not have any power in any discussion with CCP. It is delusional to claim otherwise. You can express opinions, give feedback, communicate dissatisfaction but you have no power.
You can effect change by direct action, blogging, posting here and contacting the gaming press. You should have continued that until CCP were prepared to come to the community as a whole with clear plans on how they were going to address our concerns. Instead you bent over as soon as CCP asked. You stopped all direct action at the drop of a hat and threw away the one bargaining point you actually had going for you.
Get over yourself Meissa the guys with MBA's in the PR department in Rekjavik are wetting themselves that you have fallen for their blag again. |

Saerathus
Vocatio Ad Virtutem
80
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 12:15:00 -
[439] - Quote
As an aside to the current direction this thread has taken, despite my continued irritation with the CSM being hobbled by NDA nonsense I'd like to register my appreciation towards Meissa and Two Step in particular for actively fielding communications with the players in this thread. Doubtless it's irritating to have to essentially address the same frustration (my own included) over and over again. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 12:33:00 -
[440] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:Meissa Anunthiel wrote:Temulkar Blaine wrote:Look nobody in their right mind is decrying the efforts of the CSM. I certainly appreciate the fact they took time out of their lives to go to Iceland and try to improve this game.
Two step gets uber defensive claiming the fact that they went to the summit should be applauded. It should be.
However, the point of my initial comment that two step was responding to was that CCP did not listen in July. The july summit was an abject failure. The process of communicating with CCP was proven to be fundementally flawed. There have been no improvemets in direction attitude or communication between the players and CCP since that meeting.
I reiterate the CSM is not a paliament it is a talking shop. Unfortunatly some of this CSM seem to be convinced they have more power or authority than they really have.
As for utterly ridiculous statements like people who dont vote cant complain. This is not a democratic nation, power is not derived from the electorate power is in the hands of a game manufacturer. If you play the game you have a right to complain about it and a right not to pay for a substandard product if that is your choice.
And I did vote in the election by the way. CSM is a democratically elected body tasked with interacting with devs. The only authority we have is that given to us by you and CCP, collectively. The powers we have are byproducts of that. If we talk with devs and tell you "they're going to **** something up big time", you'll rage. If we talk to the devs and they tell us "they're fixing this", even though you (collective) may not see the results directly, you see the direction. Statements made by the CSM to the public, if not respected induce :rage: and threadnoughts as a result. So it's indirect power, but it's power still. Oh, and people who don't vote have every right to complain if they so want, and they have the same power we have. It just takes many more of non-voters to achieve the same result than having someone represent you can. You are not democratically elected you are elected by democratic process there is a significant difference. You have no power. You can only effect change if CCP listens to you as pointed out by two step. YOu have no executive decision makers, there is no accountability to the electorate, Your mandate is derived from less than 10% of the game population, not from a popular vote. You are a talking shop that CCP can choose to take account of or can dismiss and ignore when they so choose. You have no electoral power imbued in the CSM as a body to change that. You may have dignitas and authority from your position as community leaders, Im sure the goons respect mittens after all but dont mistake that for actual power within a game company. The power in a busuness resides with the owners and investors of that businness not with workers committees or customer satisfaction think tanks. You do not have any power in any discussion with CCP. It is delusional to claim otherwise. You can express opinions, give feedback, communicate dissatisfaction but you have no power. You can effect change by direct action, blogging, posting here and contacting the gaming press. You should have continued that until CCP were prepared to come to the community as a whole with clear plans on how they were going to address our concerns. Instead you bent over as soon as CCP asked. You stopped all direct action at the drop of a hat and threw away the one bargaining point you actually had going for you. Get over yourself Meissa the guys with MBA's in the PR department in Rekjavik are wetting themselves that you have fallen for their blag again.
You are employing a common fallacy (the fallacy of the excluded middle) in trying to assert that there is no spectrum of influence between executive power and utter powerlessness. It's obviously true that Meissa or Two Step don't have as much power as, say, Hilmar, but it's also readily obvious that they don't have zero power either. It is dishonest of you to try and use logical fallacies to assert that the CSM don't have some power to influence what CCP and the way they do it. Multiple devs have confirmed that they have found the CSM extremely useful in shaping how - and even whether - features get developed.
But it's so much easier to ignore the abundant available evidence and prove that you are just too smart, too cynical, too world-wise to be fooled and spend time running down the CSM instead of supporting them. Do you think that people like you, constantly smacking the CSM and insulting the members make the CSM more powerful or less powerful? Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
|

Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 13:16:00 -
[441] - Quote
So much squabbling while CCP's investors and the executive team laugh all the way to the bank (though, that loan repayment is coming up soon...).
The only thing that can be trusted in all of this nonsense is the code deployed to Tranquility. Period.
Until code is published to Tranquility and made live, both CCP's and the CSM's words hold no value. 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters |

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 13:21:00 -
[442] - Quote
You are mistaking an ability to influence as power to effect change. I am not painting a picture between two extremes I am agreeing with a CSM statement that unless CCP are listening there is nothing they can do. Not my point Two steps.
My posting history should show that I do not post regularly nor do I run down the CSM I voted for it and believe it is important. I have openly acknolwledged their efforts in this thread; nor have I stooped to personal insults despite being subjected to some of the most poorly written invective I have read in some time.
It is neither dishonest nor a fallacy to state that the CSM has no power in fact it is delusional to claim otherwise. It is a customer satisfasction think tank no more. If CCP choose to ignore it even the limited ability to influence is negated and they have been ignored since June as evidenced by their own blogs, posts on here and kugu.
This thread is directly concerned with the failure of the current CSM to effect any change in an issue that for most players is the most pressing and has been since teh June release of Incarna. It is not a judgment on past CSM it is a judgement on a current process that has been proven by all the available evidence to have failed.
Before you accuse me of things I clearly havent done I suggest you read my posts first, you might learn somthing. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 13:55:00 -
[443] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:You are mistaking an ability to influence as power to effect change...
Can you explain the difference to me?
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
152
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 14:13:00 -
[444] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:You are mistaking an ability to influence as power to effect change. I am not painting a picture between two extremes I am agreeing with a CSM statement that unless CCP are listening there is nothing they can do. Not my point Two steps.
My posting history should show that I do not post regularly nor do I run down the CSM I voted for it and believe it is important. I have openly acknolwledged their efforts in this thread; nor have I stooped to personal insults despite being subjected to some of the most poorly written invective I have read in some time.
It is neither dishonest nor a fallacy to state that the CSM has no power in fact it is delusional to claim otherwise. It is a customer satisfasction think tank no more. If CCP choose to ignore it even the limited ability to influence is negated and they have been ignored since June as evidenced by their own blogs, posts on here and kugu.
This thread is directly concerned with the failure of the current CSM to effect any change in an issue that for most players is the most pressing and has been since teh June release of Incarna. It is not a judgment on past CSM it is a judgement on a current process that has been proven by all the available evidence to have failed.
Before you accuse me of things I clearly havent done I suggest you read my posts first, you might learn somthing.
Please stop putting words in our mouths. We have never said that we have been ignored since June.
I don't agree with your view on how much power we have. It is true, as Malcanis said, that much of our power comes from players. We have proven via the media campaign that CCP chooses to ignore us at their own peril.
We understand that players will need to see concrete results. We haven't seen those, yet. That is why we haven't declared victory, just a temporary truce while we listen to what CCP has to say to us. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Joffre Tremblant
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
30
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 14:30:00 -
[445] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:You are mistaking an ability to influence as power to effect change.
...I'm not sure what to do with this one. |

Vicar2008
Royal Black Watch Highlanders Warped Aggression
32
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 14:33:00 -
[446] - Quote
Two step wrote:Temulkar Blaine wrote:You are mistaking an ability to influence as power to effect change. I am not painting a picture between two extremes I am agreeing with a CSM statement that unless CCP are listening there is nothing they can do. Not my point Two steps.
My posting history should show that I do not post regularly nor do I run down the CSM I voted for it and believe it is important. I have openly acknolwledged their efforts in this thread; nor have I stooped to personal insults despite being subjected to some of the most poorly written invective I have read in some time.
It is neither dishonest nor a fallacy to state that the CSM has no power in fact it is delusional to claim otherwise. It is a customer satisfasction think tank no more. If CCP choose to ignore it even the limited ability to influence is negated and they have been ignored since June as evidenced by their own blogs, posts on here and kugu.
This thread is directly concerned with the failure of the current CSM to effect any change in an issue that for most players is the most pressing and has been since teh June release of Incarna. It is not a judgment on past CSM it is a judgement on a current process that has been proven by all the available evidence to have failed.
Before you accuse me of things I clearly havent done I suggest you read my posts first, you might learn somthing. Please stop putting words in our mouths. We have never said that we have been ignored since June. I don't agree with your view on how much power we have. It is true, as Malcanis said, that much of our power comes from players. We have proven via the media campaign that CCP chooses to ignore us at their own peril. We understand that players will need to see concrete results. We haven't seen those, yet. That is why we haven't declared victory, just a temporary truce while we listen to what CCP has to say to us.
Any update from CSM or CCP for that matter on when this weeks meeting is going to take place, It Wednesday afternoon afterall and still no news  |

Ms Freak
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 14:35:00 -
[447] - Quote
Two step wrote:Temulkar Blaine wrote:You are mistaking an ..... bla bla bla....havent done I suggest you read my posts first, you might learn somthing. Please stop putting words in our mouths. We have never said that we have been ignored since June. I don't agree with your view on how much power we have. It is true, as Malcanis said, that much of our power comes from players. We have proven via the media campaign that CCP chooses to ignore us at their own peril. We understand that players will need to see concrete results. We haven't seen those, yet. That is why we haven't declared victory, just a temporary truce while we listen to what CCP has to say to us.
Two Step - Here Here.
From my point of view the CSM has not achieved anything thus far and what was been agreed to happen in the future was almost entirely caused by the threadnoughts and protests etc (CPP merely communicated with you guys). The Media grabbing all the uproar is what caused CCP to react the first time and the CSM have used that to good effect now.
However, The CSM now appears to potentially be achieving (in a smaller time frame and more co-ordinated/ targetted way) results. (I.e. getting CCP to actually listen is a good start).
What is needed now though is a timeframe. People are right when they say nothing has happened since the emergency summit. We have nothing from that so far and only got the minutes a few days back. CCP haven't changed course, All the good done by Gridlock & BFF & 1000 papercuts is being undone with low-quality rubbish that a large majority of people either don't want or are completely apathetic to.
I appologise for stating the obvious and applaude you trying to communicate with the community which is alot more than can be said for CCP.  |

Vaako Horizon
Casual Slackers Daily Operations
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 14:44:00 -
[448] - Quote
Two step wrote:Temulkar Blaine wrote:You are mistaking an ability to influence as power to effect change. I am not painting a picture between two extremes I am agreeing with a CSM statement that unless CCP are listening there is nothing they can do. Not my point Two steps.
My posting history should show that I do not post regularly nor do I run down the CSM I voted for it and believe it is important. I have openly acknolwledged their efforts in this thread; nor have I stooped to personal insults despite being subjected to some of the most poorly written invective I have read in some time.
It is neither dishonest nor a fallacy to state that the CSM has no power in fact it is delusional to claim otherwise. It is a customer satisfasction think tank no more. If CCP choose to ignore it even the limited ability to influence is negated and they have been ignored since June as evidenced by their own blogs, posts on here and kugu.
This thread is directly concerned with the failure of the current CSM to effect any change in an issue that for most players is the most pressing and has been since teh June release of Incarna. It is not a judgment on past CSM it is a judgement on a current process that has been proven by all the available evidence to have failed.
Before you accuse me of things I clearly havent done I suggest you read my posts first, you might learn somthing. Please stop putting words in our mouths. We have never said that we have been ignored since June. I don't agree with your view on how much power we have. It is true, as Malcanis said, that much of our power comes from players. We have proven via the media campaign that CCP chooses to ignore us at their own peril. We understand that players will need to see concrete results. We haven't seen those, yet. That is why we haven't declared victory, just a temporary truce while we listen to what CCP has to say to us.
Yes, we havent seen any results... from CSM or CCP... Thats the biggest issue right there... The OP was, for all intents and purposes, doing a great thing by posting but it was missing the key part of being a value post... The actuall content we all have been waiting to see. Mind you I am not talking about any specific idea or requested information but in general, it was missing any *BEEP* content. On that part both CSM and CCP has been failing rather had for some time now. Most of the CSM must be aware of that by now and then to go and post a "get your hopes up" without so much as a hint...
And yes I am aware of the *BEEP* NDA, either tell CCP to give you something so we can have some "meat" or be silent :P Its been to long now that CCP/CSM have said alot but done nothing ( as far as we can see, remember the WinterGäó is rather far away to ) |

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 14:52:00 -
[449] - Quote
Im not the one putting words into your mouth, you bolded the point about CCP listening that I made, your inferrence was clear. On top of that since the July summit nothing has actually changed has it? no change in direction mindset or communication from CCP towards its playerbase. That alone demonstrates that you were ignored in July.
You can influence, you can represent opinion you can give feedback. You cannot take any decision that would affect this game in any way. You do not have any power to do that. Your lobbyists not an elected government
You can influence through a press campaign and direct action, it was a damn good idea given up on as soon as CCP offered more talks that are even more secretive than the July debacle.
Surely you can understand the scepticism |

Vaako Horizon
Casual Slackers Daily Operations
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 15:01:00 -
[450] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:Im not the one putting words into your mouth, you bolded the point about CCP listening that I made, your inferrence was clear. On top of that since the July summit nothing has actually changed has it? no change in direction mindset or communication from CCP towards its playerbase. That alone demonstrates that you were ignored in July.
You can influence, you can represent opinion you can give feedback. You cannot take any decision that would affect this game in any way. You do not have any power to do that. Your lobbyists not an elected government
You can influence through a press campaign and direct action, it was a damn good idea given up on as soon as CCP offered more talks that are even more secretive than the July debacle.
Surely you can understand the scepticism
I dont think they can.... They have spent some time with CCP now, having access to more then we have so I think they have forgotten how us "normal" players feel. Blinded by their "power" if you will :D |
|

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
195
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 15:02:00 -
[451] - Quote
Vaako Horizon wrote:
Yes, we havent seen any results... from CSM or CCP... Thats the biggest issue right there... The OP was, for all intents and purposes, doing a great thing by posting but it was missing the key part of being a value post... The actuall content we all have been waiting to see. Mind you I am not talking about any specific idea or requested information but in general, it was missing any *BEEP* content. On that part both CSM and CCP has been failing rather had for some time now. Most of the CSM must be aware of that by now and then to go and post a "get your hopes up" without so much as a hint...
And yes I am aware of the *BEEP* NDA, either tell CCP to give you something so we can have some "meat" or be silent :P Its been to long now that CCP/CSM have said alot but done nothing ( as far as we can see, remember the WinterGäó is rather far away to )
I understand results and substance would be much preferable to "we're having meetings", and when the meetings will be done, I'll post the substance you can be sure of it.
Before the post the forums were aflame with comments about how CCP is not listening, how things are going down the drain, how we don't hear about any change in the right direction, etc.
Now I'm telling you: "You've been heard. What CCP will do exactly is still being discussed, but know that all your posting has not been for naught, I'll get back to you when we know exactly".
The 2nd meeting of that sequence has not yet taken place. After the last one and embryos of solutions were discussed both parties went back to discuss among themselves (and with you in the CSM's case) what we want and how and how much and when, etc. and compare that with what is doable etc. It's a process...
I'll repeat myself, but here's a fictious example. Let's say we discussed with CCP and we asked them to get an extra 3 feature teams working on Eve (FiS) on top of the existing one. CCP might have responded it should be doable. I'd have published that. Then CCP reconvenes with its scrum leaders, designers, producers, etc. and checks everything to see how to shuffle people about. CCP comes back to us for meeting number 2 and says that 1 of the feature team should stick to getting CQs out of the door because the work is 80% done and it'd be stupid not to. I would personally agree (and mostly the rest of the CSM), so I'd post that. Forums would go "but you said 3! you're lying, you're backtracking, you can't be trusted, everyone protest in Jita in cancel their accounts", etc. You've seen it enough times in the past to know that expectations need to be managed.
So, we're telling you "we're discussing addressing the issues, it's too early to tell you how and how much and what, but it's being discussed". Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Vaako Horizon
Casual Slackers Daily Operations
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 15:16:00 -
[452] - Quote
On that "specific" part, I'd actually want to know a few of the "topics" still aware they are just talks... and that some of the topics might change several times. It whould be wastly more meat then "we are talking"
The difference between dreaming and waiting? I whould much rather dream then wait... ( but thats just me..... )
EDIT: I ment to say I'd rather dream while waiting then just wait... |

EVE Stig
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 15:44:00 -
[453] - Quote
"..." "Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"! |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
53
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 15:45:00 -
[454] - Quote
fail it said ganked an posted anyways >< They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
53
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 15:46:00 -
[455] - Quote
"we were ganked" gotta love that these guys cant even get web page coding right...
Ms Freak wrote: The Media grabbing all the uproar
yeah... im pretty sure they didnt come upon his post all by themselves. Its pretty funny how ay the media outlets seemed to find that one post all at the same time. An Mittens' "wow, gosh, my internet fame is more than I thought" bullshit is just that. Im fairly certain someone sent several mails with links in them an the gaming media saw scandal an EVE an leaped on the story like a bum on a ham sandwich.
They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |

the plague
Anthraxus Defense Laboratories
17
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 16:19:00 -
[456] - Quote
Unfortunately, Meissa, most of the goodwill toward EVE has been used up by CCP's delaying tactics, ridiculous overuse of the NDA, and general failure to actually listen to anyone about anything. And it bears mentioning that there's a big difference between hearing and listening, and by now it ought to be clear to even the most die-hard fanboy that CCP hears a lot but listens very little.
The problem is this, Meissa: the community has made it more than clear it is very dissatisfied with CCP's entire approach to EVE Online over the past two years or so. This isn't just about getting CCP to throw us a bone and allocate two or three more devs to FiS, or patching a few bugs, etc. On the contrary, in my estimation the community has lost faith that CCP knows what it is doing when it comes to the continued development of this game. Gone are the days when CCP would surprise and excite the community with innovative thinking and cool new ideas that enhance and expand EVE. Instead, we now get bugs on top of bugs, expansions that subtract more than they add, and re-designs of key features that actually destroy important parts of EVE's core gameplay. None of which ever seems to get fixed.
Very few people are actually arguing that EVE Online has been getting better. But to add insult to injury, the community is repeatedly placated with token content intended to do just enough to prevent game-wide riots. And all the while actual information about what's really happening with the game and between CCP and the CSM is conveniently hidden behind an NDA smokescreen. And we all know why.
Bottom line: There's a lot of people like me out here that have invested a lot of time and resources into EVE Online over the years, and dropping a few crumbs to keep us happy isn't going to cut it any more. Anything short of CCP publicly acknowledging there are a number of very serious issues plaguing EVE that require immediate attention and a commitment to address those problems with all the resources at the company's disposal is likely to push the community over a tipping point in the very near future. A lot of us have stuck with EVE Online for a long time even though we were quite unhappy with the direction of the game, but events over the last six months have pretty much convinced me and a lot of others that CCP's leadership is tone deaf and no longer shares a common vision with the players of what this game is all about. And that's sad because EVE Online was once one of the most interesting and innovative bright spots in PC gaming.
At this point I have little or no interest in hearing that CCP is again meeting with the CSM. The secret meetings behind closed doors have produced tons of blog entries and fuel for CCP's propaganda machine, but very little in the way of tangible results that players can see. And the worst part is even the little victories the CSM has been able to achieve have mostly involved items that should have been fixed without CCP having to be forced.
For the first time in years I've allowed all my other accounts to lapse and I have no intention of reactivating them until I see some concrete changes. Hearing about meetings and NDAs and crap articles on MMO news sites about how great it's all going to be is no longer going to cut it. There are other developers competing for my gaming time and that's where I'll be until CCP cleans its own house and makes some very tough decisions about where this game ought to be headed. |

Vaako Horizon
Casual Slackers Daily Operations
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 16:25:00 -
[457] - Quote
the plague wrote:Unfortunately, Meissa, most of the goodwill toward EVE has been used up by CCP's delaying tactics, ridiculous overuse of the NDA, and general failure to actually listen to anyone about anything. And it bears mentioning that there's a big difference between hearing and listening, and by now it ought to be clear to even the most die-hard fanboy that CCP hears a lot but listens very little.
The problem is this, Meissa: the community has made it more than clear it is very dissatisfied with CCP's entire approach to EVE Online over the past two years or so. This isn't just about getting CCP to throw us a bone and allocate two or three more devs to FiS, or patching a few bugs, etc. On the contrary, in my estimation the community has lost faith that CCP knows what it is doing when it comes to the continued development of this game. Gone are the days when CCP would surprise and excite the community with innovative thinking and cool new ideas that enhance and expand EVE. Instead, we now get bugs on top of bugs, expansions that subtract more than they add, and re-designs of key features that actually destroy important parts of EVE's core gameplay. None of which ever seems to get fixed.
Very few people are actually arguing that EVE Online has been getting better. But to add insult to injury, the community is repeatedly placated with token content intended to do just enough to prevent game-wide riots. And all the while actual information about what's really happening with the game and between CCP and the CSM is conveniently hidden behind an NDA smokescreen. And we all know why.
Bottom line: There's a lot of people like me out here that have invested a lot of time and resources into EVE Online over the years, and dropping a few crumbs to keep us happy isn't going to cut it any more. Anything short of CCP publicly acknowledging there are a number of very serious issues plaguing EVE that require immediate attention and a commitment to addressthose problems with all the resources at the company's disposal is likely to push the community over a tipping point in the very near future. A lot of us have stuck with EVE Online for a long time even though we were quite unhappy with the direction of the game, but events over the last six months have pretty much convinced me and a lot of others that CCP's leadership is tone deaf and no longer shares a common vision with the players of what this game is all about. And that's sad because EVE Online was once one of the most interesting and innovative bright spots in PC gaming.
At this point I have little or no interest in hearing that CCP is again meeting with the CSM. The secret meetings behind closed doors have produced tons of blog entries and fuel for CCP's propaganda machine, but very little in the way of tangible results that players can see. And the worst part is even the little victories the CSM has been able to achieve have mostly involved items that should have been fixed without CCP having to be forced.
For the first time in years I've allowed all my other accounts to lapse and I have no intention of reactivating them until I see some concrete changes. Hearing about meetings and NDAs and crap articles on MMO news sites about how great it's all going to be is no longer going to cut it. There are other developers competing for my gaming time and that's where I'll be until CCP cleans its own house and makes some very tough decisions about where this game ought to be headed.
ooo, you have even larger dreams I see.. I'd be happy with a new ship, drones fix+control and hybrids/gallente :D
|

Wolfic
Risk Breakers Lizard Kings
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 16:43:00 -
[458] - Quote
Right now I don't know any more than I did before this announcement. If the problem is lack of communication from CCP it is incredibly stupid to try and fix that with secret meetings.They need to tell US something of substance not just the CSM. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 18:14:00 -
[459] - Quote
the plague wrote:
Very few people are actually arguing that EVE Online has been getting better...
Actually, the really heartbreaking thing is that the few people who are assigned to spaceships-EVE have been doing really good work. In some very tangible ways, EVE has got better. The results produced by Team Gridlock have been nothing short of astounding, for instance. The lag monster hasn't been entirely slain, but he's definitely been pushed out of the region of 3-digit fights. In a purely mechanical sense, the FiS engine is in the best shape it has ever been. Team BFF also did sterling work in clearing up many of the longstanding minor annoyances in the EVE UI and various gameplay issues that caused annoyance out of proportion to their objective significance purely because they were so minor and had been left for so long. Technically speaking, CCP are actually in a excellent place to develop spaceships-EVE: the game platform is in an excellent state (in shameful contrast to the appalling Incarna platform). Investing in expanding spaceships-EVE would be really easy now.
When one imagines what could have been achieved by having not just 2 but 8 or 10 dev-teams, of similar dedication and commitment to delivering as Team Gridlock, working on spaceships-EVE expansions... well, I think that's where the angst really comes from. I could easily imagine us having by now an EVE with 500k+ subs and increasing steadily; new types of space environment, new ships, new modules, new things to do, new places to be. System wide belts. Individual private player stations. Space cities. Mining made to be actually fun. Challenging, unpredictable PvE. Treaties.
That was the future we were expecting after Apocrypha. Instead we got a dismal motel room and space-farmville. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 18:20:00 -
[460] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Temulkar Blaine wrote:You are mistaking an ability to influence as power to effect change... Can you explain the difference to me?
Still waiting, btw. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
|

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
118
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 18:44:00 -
[461] - Quote
There is no smoke but go ahead and use the fire extinguisher anyway. That old campfire may still smolder out there somewhere and if you dig deep enough, you might actually find some coal. Don't forget gasoline and matches. Forum fix for firefox and chrome Get working images and colored text Classic forum style 2.25final |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
316
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 18:47:00 -
[462] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:the plague wrote:
Very few people are actually arguing that EVE Online has been getting better...
Actually, the really heartbreaking thing is that the few people who are assigned to spaceships-EVE have been doing really good work. In some very tangible ways, EVE has got better. The results produced by Team Gridlock have been nothing short of astounding, for instance. The lag monster hasn't been entirely slain, but he's definitely been pushed out of the region of 3-digit fights. In a purely mechanical sense, the FiS engine is in the best shape it has ever been. Team BFF also did sterling work in clearing up many of the longstanding minor annoyances in the EVE UI and various gameplay issues that caused annoyance out of proportion to their objective significance purely because they were so minor and had been left for so long. Technically speaking, CCP are actually in a excellent place to develop spaceships-EVE: the game platform is in an excellent state (in shameful contrast to the appalling Incarna platform). Investing in expanding spaceships-EVE would be really easy now. When one imagines what could have been achieved by having not just 2 but 8 or 10 dev-teams, of similar dedication and commitment to delivering as Team Gridlock, working on spaceships-EVE expansions... well, I think that's where the angst really comes from. I could easily imagine us having by now an EVE with 500k+ subs and increasing steadily; new types of space environment, new ships, new modules, new things to do, new places to be. System wide belts. Individual private player stations. Space cities. Mining made to be actually fun. Challenging, unpredictable PvE. Treaties. That was the future we were expecting after Apocrypha. Instead we got a dismal motel room and space-farmville.
Yep this.
The sheer wasted effort and squandered resources on Incarna is almost heartbreaking. This game could be so much more if the management was prepared to dream a bit and stop listening to marketing-zombies fixated on nickle-and-diming income from NeX.
Eve Online was once the only game in town for those wanting something different from a group of developers who were writing their own playbook not content to simply copy others.
Now, ... not so much.
And people who care about this game and community should damn well rage against the dying of the light.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 18:48:00 -
[463] - Quote
Sorry I thought Id made myself clear with subsequent posts
"You can influence, you can represent opinion you can give feedback. You cannot take any decision that would affect this game in any way. You do not have any power to do that. Your lobbyists not an elected government"
|

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 19:34:00 -
[464] - Quote
Im not wriggling, I will restate it clearly so you understand.
The power resides withn the body of the decision maker. It is the decision makers who effect change.
A lobbyist can affect the decision made by the decision maker but by virtue of their inability to take the decisions themselves they do not have power. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 19:41:00 -
[465] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:Im not wriggling, I will restate it clearly so you understand.
The power resides withn the body of the decision maker. It is the decision makers who effect change.
A lobbyist can affect the decision made by the decision maker but by virtue of their inability to take the decisions themselves they do not have power.
OK well I'm done letting you make yourself look stupid, so let's talk about something else now. PM me if you want to find out about adult literacy classes or even if you're just not sure what a synonym is.
PS Did you know that electricity and heat are both types of power, even though they're physically completely different? Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
|

CCP Zymurgist
C C P C C P Alliance
128

|
Posted - 2011.09.14 19:45:00 -
[466] - Quote
Thread cleaned of off-topic posts. Please remain on subject and if you wish to discuss Margret Thatcher, we do offer the Out of Pod Experience forum.  Zymurgist Community Representative CCP NA, EVE Online Contact Us at http://support.eveonline.com/pages/petitions/createpetition.aspx |
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 19:48:00 -
[467] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:I openly stated Thatcher loved the show, Its a comminly known fact.
Now whilst Im happy to have this debate rationally, You know your being ridiculous. You are shifting an argument to a thirty year old tv programme rather than looking at the concepts of delegated authority within a state.
Rather than looking at the posts I have made on this issue within this thread your trying to shift your argument away fronm the pertinent issues. really Thatcher was manipulated is not smart, I accepted your facepalm when I talked of lobbyists even though it exemplifies my point.
There are multiple text books on law and the state and where power resides, go and read one please.
Law books are one thing; reality is another. You seem to be fixated on legal or official authority as the only meaningful conduit of power, when it's is blindingly obvious that it isn't.
As for your Thatcher comment, she also openly stated that Yes Minister was a "clearly-observed portrayal of what goes on in the corridors of power". Are you saying that you know more about the actual reality of governing than Thatcher? If not, why would you ignore her very plain statement that YM is an excellent illustration of that reality?
Honestly, your blind unwillingness to concede an argument does you no favours. Ability and influence are synonyms of power. get over it. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 19:57:00 -
[468] - Quote
The "Yes, Minister" series are pure awesome .. I remember many hardy laughs and much sniggering when watching them 
Temulkar Blaine wrote:..The power resides withn the body of the decision maker. It is the decision makers who effect change.. The "decision makers" do indeed effect the changes as their signatures are required in most circumstances, but that does mean that the decisions are actually theirs to begin with. They are for all intents and purposes merely figureheads for the various departments/ministries where 99% of the work is done by civil servants, CS who are not replaced every time public opinion skips a beat or a new fad strikes :insert name of capital: ..
Lobbyist's don't even come into play until long after the CS has had time to dig into whomever 'the people' sent to their dining table .. manipulation of scatter-brains like politicians is easy enough as it is, now imagine how easy/smooth it is when you have 20 years headstart on the subject in regards to "how things work".
In short: Screw the lobbyist's, they are just walking wallets with agendas. Fear the Civil Servants, for they are unknown!
PS: What the hell is with these crappy forums! I used "< >" in the text and it refused to post it because it was HTML .. fail!
|

Temulkar Blaine
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 20:13:00 -
[469] - Quote
Malcanis, mate I sent you a mail rather than derailing the thread. Yep fine I totally accept that my interpretation of power was narrow, although not within the point i was trying to illustrate. happy to respond if you want to flail me further. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
53
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 23:00:00 -
[470] - Quote
the plague wrote:Unfortunately, Meissa, most of the goodwill toward EVE has been used up by CCP's delaying tactics, ridiculous overuse of the NDA, and general failure to actually listen to anyone about anything. And it bears mentioning that there's a big difference between hearing and listening, and by now it ought to be clear to even the most die-hard fanboy that CCP hears a lot but listens very little.
Hilmars email showed us that philosophy
They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |
|

Kengutsi Akira
GloboTech Industries
14
|
Posted - 2011.09.15 00:08:00 -
[471] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:"Louis deGuerre Dear CSM, If you have nothing to say then don't say anything. I like you guys so not reported for spam/trolling.  *Hugs*" As Ive noticed it doesnt even matter if you do report them the mods dont touch anything they say, an Ive seen some pretty blatantly troll posts by more than a few of them. "THIS game needs an NDA because of the competitive nature of it. IE if I knew they were definitely going to remove ice from high sec tomorrow, guess what i'd be buying today?" Hence why them telling us there would be more transparency was utter bullshit. You cant HAVE more transparency in this game cause the sharks will take it as a sign of weakness and use every bit of info given to their advantage AND THATS NOT A BAD THING Transparency just doesnt track in a game this cutthroat Azelor Delaria wrote:J Kunjeh wrote:Azelor Delaria wrote: You want to prove you're on our side, then tell CCP to f*** off on the NDA just once. If the entire CSM says, "You know what? The NDA is good, but transparency was promised, and you owe the players that much", what is CCP going to do? Fire you all? You don't work for them. Are they going to kick you off the CSM? If you truly want to help, then let your balls drop - all of you and put your money where your mouth is. All we see if pussyfooting around the subjects with vague insinuations and non-specific threads. It gets old.
You're totally clueless about the real world, obviously, so I'll help you out: NDA's have LEGAL standing and those who break them can be sued in court. So yeah, NONE of them are likely to break NDA and for damn good reason. Fool... Non-Disclosure Agreements have legal standing if, and only if, the information obtained and disseminated produces actual harm. In essence, unless trade secrets are leaked, the NDA isn't violated. A CSM coming out and saying, "Look, we talked about X with CCP, Zulu agrees, he's bringing it to the bosses" isn't a violation of trade secrets. At least I hope it isn't. I mean, is making the game better to keep subscriptions a trade secret, now...? lol THIS guy is the internet lawyer. Yes it IS a trade secret. Theres a reason some games dont want ppl to know the number of subs they have. ANYTHING THEY DISCUSS in the meetings that has or (especially) will have an impact on the game them become trade secrets. Its like if Ford were in a meeting where theyre discussing the new transmission (here it would be code or a tweak or a fix or NeX items) theyre planning on putting on their newest car. No there are no CURRENT competitors to EVE out there, but how do we know there arent ppl planning on making something or deep in the coding of a new game thats yet unannounced that would be interested in snapping up info given out freely Which is kinda why transparency is a broken idea here.
lol someone is reading the thread. They just "like"d my post had to cut some quotes to be able to post it lol |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
195
|
Posted - 2011.09.15 18:09:00 -
[472] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:the plague wrote:Unfortunately, Meissa, most of the goodwill toward EVE has been used up by CCP's delaying tactics, ridiculous overuse of the NDA, and general failure to actually listen to anyone about anything. And it bears mentioning that there's a big difference between hearing and listening, and by now it ought to be clear to even the most die-hard fanboy that CCP hears a lot but listens very little.
Hilmars email showed us that philosophy
Which version of it, I've seen 3 public ones. Some of them with and some without inflamatory statements. And a non-public one I won't make public either (that's both better and worse, depending).
Most of it was a lot of yarr yarr directed at motivating the troops (hey, it's a big company).
Also you don't know *when* the mail had been sent, the amount of information at hilmar's disposal when he wrote it, etc.
Not defending the stance portrayed as having been Hilmar's, far from it, but just saying you lack context to appreciate how damning it actually is/was, it ranges from "very" to "not that much".
One thing I can absolutely tell you you lack context on is the phrase "we'll look at what player do and less at what they say". This is a phrase Hilmar had already said when I met him in CSM 3, and also once in CSM 5. He uses it frequently to refer to the fact he uses the actual data of what people do rather than the sometimes extremely vocal forum minority. An approach I can't fault him for taking, by the way.
If, however, he wrote what he did knowing full well the scale of our discontent, both on the forums, in-game and in terms of unsubs, that's a different story, but you don't know that, and neither do I.
My personal experience with the man is that when he is provided with the same information we have, we understand one another (not saying we always agree, but he's been reasonable enough), the worst version that kept being circulated showed an hilmar totally out of touch with reality. Who knows, his newborn daughter may have caused him to lose his mind, but I instead read that mail with a lot of salt.
That said, an update, next meeting with Zulu is scheduled for tomorrow, unless there's last minute scheduling problems, so I'll post an update tomorrow night. Either with substance or without, depending on the conversation and whether another round of "let's get the details right" is necessary. Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
109
|
Posted - 2011.09.15 18:32:00 -
[473] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote: That said, an update, next meeting with Zulu is scheduled for tomorrow, unless there's last minute scheduling problems, so I'll post an update tomorrow night. Either with substance or without, depending on the conversation and whether another round of "let's get the details right" is necessary.
Quoted the interesting bit. I look forward to giving you a hard time on that annoucement but hope I won't have to.
- [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

inexistin
Rubbish and Garbage Removal Atlas.
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.15 20:25:00 -
[474] - Quote
I have to add you to my contacts, so I know who to vote for on the next CSM election.
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:That said, an update, next meeting with Zulu is scheduled for tomorrow, unless there's last minute scheduling problems, so I'll post an update tomorrow night. Either with substance or without, depending on the conversation and whether another round of "let's get the details right" is necessary.
Now here's a glimmer of hope for our information-starved EVE appetite. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Sane Industries Inc.
111
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 10:59:00 -
[475] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:As for your Thatcher comment, she also openly stated that Yes Minister was a "clearly-observed portrayal of what goes on in the corridors of power". Just as a total side point, both Mittens and myself are huge fans of Yes, Minister. CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM blog |

Trolls Troll
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 11:10:00 -
[476] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:
One thing I can absolutely tell you you lack context on is the phrase "we'll look at what player do and less at what they say". This is a phrase Hilmar had already said when I met him in CSM 3, and also once in CSM 5. He uses it frequently to refer to the fact he uses the actual data of what people do rather than the sometimes extremely vocal forum minority. An approach I can't fault him for taking, by the way.
Yes but taking this approach you always walk a fine line between pushing, and pushing too far. |

inexistin
Rubbish and Garbage Removal Atlas.
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 20:20:00 -
[477] - Quote
So... any news on this? |

Salpun
Paramount Commerce Masters of Flying Objects
29
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 21:22:00 -
[478] - Quote
Another thread was started for the second meeting might be off the first page do not have time to find and link
Second thread covering the second meeting. |

Meryen Anais
The Polaris Axis Dignitas.
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.18 13:32:00 -
[479] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
Actually, the really heartbreaking thing is that the few people who are assigned to spaceships-EVE have been doing really good work. In some very tangible ways, EVE has got better. The results produced by Team Gridlock have been nothing short of astounding, for instance. The lag monster hasn't been entirely slain, but he's definitely been pushed out of the region of 3-digit fights. In a purely mechanical sense, the FiS engine is in the best shape it has ever been. Team BFF also did sterling work in clearing up many of the longstanding minor annoyances in the EVE UI and various gameplay issues that caused annoyance out of proportion to their objective significance purely because they were so minor and had been left for so long. Technically speaking, CCP are actually in a excellent place to develop spaceships-EVE: the game platform is in an excellent state (in shameful contrast to the appalling Incarna platform). Investing in expanding spaceships-EVE would be really easy now.
When one imagines what could have been achieved by having not just 2 but 8 or 10 dev-teams, of similar dedication and commitment to delivering as Team Gridlock, working on spaceships-EVE expansions... well, I think that's where the angst really comes from. I could easily imagine us having by now an EVE with 500k+ subs and increasing steadily; new types of space environment, new ships, new modules, new things to do, new places to be. System wide belts. Individual private player stations. Space cities. Mining made to be actually fun. Challenging, unpredictable PvE. Treaties.
That was the future we were expecting after Apocrypha. Instead we got a dismal motel room and space-farmville.
qft |

Erik Finnegan
Polytechnique Gallenteenne
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 18:42:00 -
[480] - Quote
Cedric deBouilard wrote:to CSM; I realize CCP (and NDA) limits your ability to make clear statements here in forums, but know some people (me included) think you're doing a damn fine job of pestering, annoying, poking the CCP and trying to give them a wake-up call.
your efforts are much appreciated. QFT |
|

Ubee Rubiks
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 19:55:00 -
[481] - Quote
I like the idea of a csm however you reputatin was affected along with the leaks, weather or not they were true representatins of ccp's direction. After those leaks the public thought ccp didnt care about the players and just wanted to milk money from them and the csm being an elected body of players would not matter.
I would like to say to the csm to continue fighting for eve online and to try to convince ccp not to ruin it however I will be expecting the opposite until proven wrong. I still have one of my 2 subs active but await ccps direction and assume the worst. Ccp and the csm have a long way to go to make the community trust them again.
I would also like to suggest that maybe they put the ideas that the csm (balancing issues or features for example) in a seperate section in the patch notes so we can see what the csm actually gets put into the patches. |

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
195
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 20:37:00 -
[482] - Quote
Ubee Rubiks wrote:I like the idea of a csm however you reputatin was affected along with the leaks, weather or not they were true representatins of ccp's direction. After those leaks the public thought ccp didnt care about the players and just wanted to milk money from them and the csm being an elected body of players would not matter.
I would like to say to the csm to continue fighting for eve online and to try to convince ccp not to ruin it however I will be expecting the opposite until proven wrong. I still have one of my 2 subs active but await ccps direction and assume the worst. Ccp and the csm have a long way to go to make the community trust them again.
I would also like to suggest that maybe they put the ideas that the csm (balancing issues or features for example) in a seperate section in the patch notes so we can see what the csm actually gets put into the patches.
Thanks,
Believe me when I say I've done nothing but work towards making eve a better game, with the devs.
What happens is that they have the same objective we have, but differ on the method. Sometimes Team Awesome thinks they have a better grasp on what's desirable, we beg to differ.
This here is a case of "I told you so", hopefully they'll take our input more into consideration as far as general direction is concerned.
As far as attribution goes, I don't really care about being able to be pointed at as one of the sources for a change. Let me say, however, that the CSM *does* get to provide input on the implementation details of most thing that make it in. Doesn't mean our input/recommendations are followed to the letter (nor should they be in some cases), but the individual grunts tasked with implementing the features do take our input into account.
Now we have to fight for managers to listen to us as devs do (many of whom are as frustrated as you and I are, by the way). Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |

Bel Amar
Sudden Buggery
8
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 21:11:00 -
[483] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:If, however, he wrote what he did knowing full well the scale of our discontent, both on the forums, in-game and in terms of unsubs, that's a different story, but you don't know that, and neither do I.
If the anger from the email is a misunderstanding, it could have easily been resolved by CCP clarifying just those sorts of details.
If people are angry because of assumptions and those assumptions are wrong, you don't stand there and say "Hey guys, calm down, what if your assumptions are wrong", you say "Hey guys, calm down, here are the facts" |

Ubee Rubiks
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 21:28:00 -
[484] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote: As far as attribution goes, I don't really care about being able to be pointed at as one of the sources for a change. Let me say, however, that the CSM *does* get to provide input on the implementation details of most thing that make it in. Doesn't mean our input/recommendations are followed to the letter (nor should they be in some cases), but the individual grunts tasked with implementing the features do take our input into account.
Now we have to fight for managers to listen to us as devs do (many of whom are as frustrated as you and I are, by the way).
I suggested putting that in the patch notes so we can see progress of the CSM. It seems to most of the player base (from my perspective) that you just go to meetings and then hide behind the NDA. This may not be the case but, if we had some sort of showing in the patch notes that an issue you had input on got acted on (even if its not completely implemented your way) I think it would help the CSM during election time and it would help to show us you are not just going to a meeting and then shouting NDA and then saying you made a difference. I hope you see my point in that |

Steph Wing
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 23:20:00 -
[485] - Quote
So...weren't we supposed to get something early this week? |

Krall Hoar
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.22 01:20:00 -
[486] - Quote
I hope CSM can be at least the annoying poke to CCP. I am here for almost 8 years now, and I never felt so bored before than in the last year. There is way to much stagnation. And all we get is like those already talked about bones. We just get makeup but no real stuff to touch. I like running around in my quarter, but I swear I will never even pay a single euro on some boots, cause microtransactiosn ae for lousy browser games or mmos who run so bad that they need f2p and want money with mircotransactions. WHy do I pay for EVE if I have to get stuff with more euros? I like the new ship engines and the new scorp design, but why is there no overhauled design (the bitmapping thing) of all ships and not the new engines on all ships? We got shown nebulae, I was looking forward to them, but now its almost anoter fanfest and they are still not at the horizont. I am just asking myself these days what happend to CCP. Once I was so proud that all that came out was perfect, but now? I waited 4 years since the first announcement of walking in stations and now I am trapped in a single room? Where is the super nice Station? You promise, and we get it, often later, but we get it. But in the last times its like we get shown a cake and just get a piece of it with a mark "tase it, thats what you get someday" Don't missunderstand me, I love EVE and theres nothing better out there. But I want to have the good days back (not the times the universe was so ******* nice big [6k player peak :-)] which would be awsome, a bigger universe [lowsec is to small]) when we got good new promised stuff complete. Stop promising stuff to us if you can't bring it CCP, or do you want to get a reputation like Blizzard? I am more happy with, its done when its done, instead of here get this we promised, but its not perfect/complete yet. |

Officer Spawn
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2011.09.22 16:29:00 -
[487] - Quote
Will there be another meeting tomorrow ? Better not keep Zulu from writing his awesome blog. |

MeigsYan
Black Out Horizons
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.22 18:00:00 -
[488] - Quote
Quote: No, I can't tell you what we proposed. Even things that I say to CCP can be covered by the NDA.
Again, our role is not to tell CCP who to hire or who to make work weekends. We are dissatisfied with the current level of staffing on FiS, and we want CCP to change that. Adding a single person would be good, switching the entire company over to working on EVE would be better. Hopefully we will end up somewhere in between.
My own ideas on what should be added are irrelevant. I still favor the same stuff I favored when I ran for CSM, you can see details on that in my blog (linked in my signature). In general, the CSM is all in agreement that the *critical* issue right now is balance (especially supercaps, but including all ships), and we would like to see that fixed ASAP.
If all the CSM is empowered to do is join the body of people not empowered to tell us anything, then it's time we eliminated the dead end that is the CSM.
CCP can use an online survey to allow players to inform them of what we want in the game and what we like and dislike as paying customers without the need the "interpretive" layer that the CSM has become. |

Byshop Kayl
Club Bear The Seventh Day
8
|
Posted - 2011.09.22 18:12:00 -
[489] - Quote
MeigsYan wrote: If all the CSM is empowered to do is join the body of people not empowered to tell us anything, then it's time we eliminated the dead end that is the CSM.
CCP can use an online survey to allow players to inform them of what we want in the game and what we like and dislike as paying customers without the need the "interpretive" layer that the CSM has become.
I both agree and disagree with you.
Having the polls would be a great way to let CCP/CSM know the direction a broader segment of the player population would like to see things go.
But in reality, having a strong voice to speak up for us in a face to face meeting can have a far greater impact then poll numbers printed from a spreadsheet.
I WANT the CSM. But, what I want is a CSM that actually has an affect.
Maybe the current CSM does, maybe they don't, there is absolutely nothing for us to go on to make that determination other than vague "hide-behind-the-NDA" talk.
Since the release of Incarna, the only thing CCP and the CSM have produced is a whole lot of words.
I want to be proven wrong. I want the CSM/CCP to take action and breathe some life back into the comatose New Eden.
-á"Sanity is the playground of the unimaginitive."-á-- Anonymous "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over-áagain expecting different results."-á-- A. Einstein |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: [one page] |