| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Elistea
BLUE Regiment.
101
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 09:48:00 -
[901] - Quote
captain foivos wrote:Update: CCP has once again shat on ganking in order to turn highsec into a risk-free carebear paradise.
Retribution is all about balancing ships and what not, so why not balance out ganking a bit while you're at it? Over the last eight years, ganking has been nerfed nearly into the ground, with only a few select groups of highly skilled, well funded individuals continuing to separate stupid highsec mongoloids from their precious shiny things. Why not buff immoral activity for a change? Reward smart people for taking basic precautions against dying and loss, like not traveling around with billions in their hold, not clicking on the contracts in Jita local, and not traveling the Rancer Pipe with hundreds of PLEX in the cargo bay.
Ganking keeps getting hit with more and more nerfs: pretty soon there won't be that "cold harsh universe" left that CCP keeps going on about in their promos. EVE belongs to the violent, the venal, and the brilliant. Buff ganking. Nerf dumb people.
Complaining about CCP nerfing way you kill helpless transports and freighters in HS. It takes real skill and effort. Your F1 button must me ON FIRE!. I salute you sir. |

Lord Zim
1624
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 09:51:00 -
[902] - Quote
Elistea wrote:Complaining about CCP nerfing way you kill helpless transports and freighters in HS. It takes real skill and effort. Your F1 button must me ON FIRE!. I salute you sir. Yet another super creative insult from a hisec pubbie. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2409
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 09:57:00 -
[903] - Quote
The changes mean that it is not possible to profitably gank macks so it is impossible to adapt and this, macks face no real threat. It also means that the skiff is rendered useless and the hulk shunned due to its tank making it profitable to gank if no tank is fitted. The macks invulnerability also means that mining bots are thriving which has had a disasterous impact on ice prices and has stalled mineral price growth as the markets get flooded with minerals. The sudden arrival of hundreds of bots has also forced up the price of plex which is hurting everyone who uses them. The barge update has also failed in its main goal of getting all of the barges roles to play.
Posted again because people dont bother to read and think this is all about easy killmails. |

Elistea
BLUE Regiment.
101
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 10:07:00 -
[904] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Elistea wrote:Complaining about CCP nerfing way you kill helpless transports and freighters in HS. It takes real skill and effort. Your F1 button must me ON FIRE!. I salute you sir. Yet another super creative insult from a hisec pubbie.
Thanks for reinforcing my point:) |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
751
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 10:13:00 -
[905] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:The changes mean that it is not possible to profitably gank macks so it is impossible to adapt and this, macks face no real threat. It also means that the skiff is rendered useless and the hulk shunned due to its tank making it profitable to gank if no tank is fitted. The macks invulnerability also means that mining bots are thriving which has had a disasterous impact on ice prices and has stalled mineral price growth as the markets get flooded with minerals. The sudden arrival of hundreds of bots has also forced up the price of plex which is hurting everyone who uses them. The barge update has also failed in its main goal of getting all of the barges roles to play.
Posted again because people dont bother to read and think this is all about easy killmails.
All they ever see is the killmail. They don't care about the effort that goes in to settng up a gank & bury their heads in the sand when it's explained. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Pipa Porto
1165
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 10:33:00 -
[906] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Kingston Black wrote:I have a suggestion for the op
Grow a pair and leave highsec if you want a fight not cry your little heart out on the forums that you cant fight **** that cant fight back in highsec waaaahhhhh!
Don't tell me I know your response already "STFU STOOPID NOOB im a real pvp'r I pvp in a large nullsec alliance and 200 of my mates and myself fleet up and go shoot unarmed poses cause were leet"
the doors that way > I suggest you use it then there would be one less door knob in eve What's with the 'can't shoot back' theme people like to use? Mining ships have drone bays you know. Also POS's have defences (Most of the time).
I also hear rumors that anyone is free to shoot at people who illegally fire upon innocent ships.
Why don't miners bring friends? They keep telling us to bring friends to gank them, afterall. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
909
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 10:47:00 -
[907] - Quote
Elistea wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Elistea wrote:Complaining about CCP nerfing way you kill helpless transports and freighters in HS. It takes real skill and effort. Your F1 button must me ON FIRE!. I salute you sir. Yet another super creative insult from a hisec pubbie. Thanks for reinforcing my point:) You had a point? http://themittani.com/features/local-problem
A simple fix to the local intel problem |

Lord Zim
1624
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 10:57:00 -
[908] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:I also hear rumors that anyone is free to shoot at people who illegally fire upon innocent ships. This is dishonoulable. >:(
Pipa Porto wrote:Why don't miners bring friends? They keep telling us to bring friends to gank them, afterall. If they brought friends, then the main mining ship of choice wouldn't be the mackinaw (or its t1 equivalent). Draw from that what inference you like. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

Pipa Porto
1165
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 10:59:00 -
[909] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:I also hear rumors that anyone is free to shoot at people who illegally fire upon innocent ships. This is dishonoulable. >:( Pipa Porto wrote:Why don't miners bring friends? They keep telling us to bring friends to gank them, afterall. If they brought friends, then the main mining ship of choice wouldn't be the mackinaw (or its t1 equivalent). Draw from that what inference you like.
To be honest, I see plenty of Macks mining with Orca support for the extra ease of use. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

TharOkha
0asis Group
101
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 11:20:00 -
[910] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:The changes mean that it is not possible to profitably gank macks so it is impossible to adapt . Have you ever heard about mining ships with expensive modules? You know, like l4 Mission boats with expensive stuff.
Mallak:
Quote:They don't care about the effort that goes in to settng up a gank & bury their heads in the sand when it's explained.
Speaking of an effort.... I heard that ganking miners in T1 destroyers was very very very difficult in skills, isk, effort.... oh wait...
Is it so hard to understand that it was not just about "you should tank it"? Exhumers had few hundreds base HP and costs as battleship. They were shot down just for lol near the stations, near the gates etc... Hell, even t1 barges were shot down just for lol, because gank was extremely cheap. I didnt heard about Battleships or Cruisers that have few hundred HP by default.
All you have to do now, is just fit nice high dps talos, fit one ship scanner and search for juicy targets with expensive modules..... speaking of an effort 
GÇ£If reality can destroy the dream, why shouldn't the dream destroy reality?GÇ¥ |

Pipa Porto
1166
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 11:30:00 -
[911] - Quote
TharOkha wrote:Is it so hard to understand that it was not just about "you should tank it"? Exhumers had few hundreds base HP and costs as battleship. They were shot down just for lol near the stations, near the gates etc... Hell, even t1 barges were shot down just for lol, because gank was extremely cheap. I didnt heard about Battleships or Cruisers that have few hundred HP by default.
First, in no way did they have "a few hundred" base HP. Even raw HP. Stop Lying.
You're whining that your Tech 2 Ship is not as sturdy as a Tech 1 ship that costs similar amounts? Waahaha, My Marauder doesn't have half the base HP of a Carrier.
They had more base EHP than most T2 Cruisers and could tank better than most HAC's standard fittings. If HAC pilots sat around AFK in space with no tank, and a full rack of guns, they'd get ganked too.
Got any killmails of properly tanked pre-Buff Hulks you can show that would imply they actually needed a buff? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Lord Zim
1624
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 11:42:00 -
[912] - Quote
TharOkha wrote:baltec1 wrote:The changes mean that it is not possible to profitably gank macks so it is impossible to adapt . Have you ever heard about mining ships with expensive modules? You know, like l4 Mission boats with expensive stuff. What sort of idiot would stick office/faction/deadspace mods on a mining barge which never moves outside of hisec in its life?
TharOkha wrote:Speaking of an effort.... I heard that ganking miners in T1 destroyers was very very very difficult in skills, isk, effort.... oh wait... It's quite clear that you've never dealt with the consequences of ganking. vOv
TharOkha wrote:Is it so hard to understand that it was not just about "you should tank it"? Exhumers had few hundreds base HP and costs as battleship. They were shot down just for lol near the stations, near the gates etc... Hell, even t1 barges were shot down just for lol, because gank was extremely cheap. I didnt heard about Battleships or Cruisers that have few hundred HP by default. 1) The HP was significantly higher than "a few hundred HP" 2) Cost of the ship itself is irrelevant.
TharOkha wrote:All you have to do now, is just fit nice high dps talos, fit one ship scanner and search for juicy targets with expensive modules..... speaking of an effort  And all you have to do is fit a tank. Now that's serious effort, right there.  Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
8
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 11:44:00 -
[913] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:TharOkha wrote:Is it so hard to understand that it was not just about "you should tank it"? Exhumers had few hundreds base HP and costs as battleship. They were shot down just for lol near the stations, near the gates etc... Hell, even t1 barges were shot down just for lol, because gank was extremely cheap. I didnt heard about Battleships or Cruisers that have few hundred HP by default. First, in no way did they have "a few hundred" base HP. Even raw HP. Stop Lying. You're whining that your Tech 2 Ship is not as sturdy as a Tech 1 ship that costs similar amounts? Waahaha, My Marauder doesn't have half the base HP of a Carrier. They had more base EHP than most T2 Cruisers and could tank better than most HAC's standard fittings. If HAC pilots sat around AFK in space with no tank, and a full rack of guns, they'd get ganked too. Got any killmails of properly tanked pre-Buff Hulks you can show that would imply they actually needed a buff?
Got the numbers handy to show that the hulk recieved a buff & that the Mack recieved a significant buff? Or are you crying over the Skiff? |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1555
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 11:53:00 -
[914] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:TharOkha wrote:All you have to do now, is just fit nice high dps talos, fit one ship scanner and search for juicy targets with expensive modules..... speaking of an effort  And all you have to do is fit a tank. Now that's serious effort, right there.  Get CCP to just bake one into your hull, now that takes some real effort
to whine until they give in. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

TharOkha
0asis Group
101
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 12:19:00 -
[915] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote: Waahaha, My Marauder doesn't have half the base HP of a Carrier.
But Im also pretty sure that your marauder wont die by 2-3 shots from catalyst (speaking of base HP).
"They had more base EHP than most T2 Cruisers" They had also much more PG to use (thousand and more vs 40-50) = the ability to fit large tank extenders. While you can fit T2 cruiser to be good at tank and at the same time good dps, you could fit your hulk only for good tank or gtfo. Can you tell me then what options miners have in fitting if their only option was to fit the tank? What purpose had MLU if you couldnt fit them?
You still missing the point. Mining ships has same HP as some cruisers and much less than BC now. Miners have the ability to fit tank (and be ungankable even from talos) or fit for yeld (but still gankable to talos). THEY HAVE A CHOICE NOW
Lord Zimm:
Quote:What sort of idiot would stick office/faction/deadspace mods on a mining barge which never moves outside of hisec in its life?
Same idiots who fit office/faction/deadspace mods on their l4 mission boats.
It's quite clear that you've never dealt with the consequences of ganking. vOv
Oh dear... im pretty sure that you didnt slept, ate or talked to people when you ganked and lost your ultra expensive t1 catalyst (and few % of sec status). The consequences had to be sooo horrible that it definitely damaged your psyche.
"The HP was significantly higher than "a few hundred HP"
Okay sorry for that, i was looking at skiff only. 
"Cost of the ship itself is irrelevant"
Then lets nerf all ships in eve so every hull will have only 1000 base HP (even titans) and have only 50 PG.
"And all you have to do is fit a tank. Now that's serious effort, right there"
Well we can play this" game" for ethernity . So again : All you have to do now, is just fit nice high dps talos, fit one ship scanner and search for juicy targets with expensive modules... Now that's serious effort  GÇ£If reality can destroy the dream, why shouldn't the dream destroy reality?GÇ¥ |

Lord Zim
1624
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 12:39:00 -
[916] - Quote
TharOkha wrote:While you can fit T2 cruiser to be good at tank and at the same time good dps, you could fit your hulk only for good tank or gtfo. Can you tell me then what options miners have in fitting if their only option was to fit the tank? What purpose had MLU if you couldnt fit them? They're for use in space where you've got control of who goes where. Just because the MLU2s are in the game, doesn't mean that you MUST fit them or the hulk is absolutely worthless.
You're mining in unsafe space, act like it.
TharOkha wrote:Same idiots who fit office/faction/deadspace mods on their l4 mission boats. I'm sure the terrible, terrible rats in hisec belts require officer/faction/deadspace mods.
I've never met any of them, but I'm sure they're there, somewhere. Hiding. Waiting. Watching your hulk.
TharOkha wrote:Oh dear... im pretty sure that you didnt slept, ate or talked to people when you ganked and lost your ultra expensive t1 catalyst (and few % of sec status). The consequences had to be sooo horrible that it definitely damaged your psyche. Don't be facetious, it doesn't change the fact that ganking is more effort to sustain than you seem to think.
But by all means, act the fool.
TharOkha wrote:Then lets nerf all ships in eve so every hull will have only 1000 base HP (even titans) and have only 50 PG. Ah, the "if I can't have my toys in hisec, then NEITHER SHALL NULLSEC HAVE ITS TOYS!" retort.
I mean, I'm sort of expecting myopic retorts at this point, but this one does really take the cake.
TharOkha wrote:Well we can play this" game" for ethernity . So again : All you have to do now, is just fit nice high dps talos, fit one ship scanner and search for juicy targets with expensive modules... Now that's serious effort  Except if you fit a tank, this "nice high dps talos" might even have to bring along a friend. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

Weiland Taur
Ceptic Innovations Rebel Alliance of New Eden
103
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 12:45:00 -
[917] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:I also hear rumors that anyone is free to shoot at people who illegally fire upon innocent ships. This is dishonoulable. >:( Pipa Porto wrote:Why don't miners bring friends? They keep telling us to bring friends to gank them, afterall. If they brought friends, then the main mining ship of choice wouldn't be the mackinaw (or its t1 equivalent). Draw from that what inference you like. To be honest, I see plenty of Macks mining with Orca support for the extra ease of use.
From my own experience the attention span of a pvp pilot on overwatch during routine mining is the same as a small child in a toy store. No offense to the pvp pilot, but is just isn't what they want to be doing (other than new alliance players trying to score browniw points, but that usually fades). Mining ships should be able to attempt tanking until help arrives and or get the hell out, or die. My idea about gankers bringing friends is that the wolf pack gank squad sounds like a very legitimate tactic to keep costs down and to increase gameplay. Just my opinion. |

Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
268
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 12:50:00 -
[918] - Quote
Weiland Taur wrote:
From my own experience the attention span of a pvp pilot on overwatch during routine mining is the same as a small child in a toy store. No offense to the pvp pilot, but is just isn't what they want to be doing (other than new alliance players trying to score browniw points, but that usually fades). Mining ships should be able to attempt tanking until help arrives and or get the hell out, or die. My idea about gankers bringing friends is that the wolf pack gank squad sounds like a very legitimate tactic to keep costs down and to increase gameplay. Just my opinion.
All while fitting cargo expanding modules. wis shall not be a cesspool of all-you-can-eat social /dance o7m8 dressup, unrestrained do ask do tell out and proud at the space bar dollhouse, bunch of dudes emoting each other, devoid of gameplay and consequnces. |

Vertisce Soritenshi
Tactical Vendor of Services and Goods Partners of Industrial Service and Salvage
1757
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 12:53:00 -
[919] - Quote
Weiland Taur wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:I also hear rumors that anyone is free to shoot at people who illegally fire upon innocent ships. This is dishonoulable. >:( Pipa Porto wrote:Why don't miners bring friends? They keep telling us to bring friends to gank them, afterall. If they brought friends, then the main mining ship of choice wouldn't be the mackinaw (or its t1 equivalent). Draw from that what inference you like. To be honest, I see plenty of Macks mining with Orca support for the extra ease of use. From my own experience the attention span of a pvp pilot on overwatch during routine mining is the same as a small child in a toy store. No offense to the pvp pilot, but is just isn't what they want to be doing (other than new alliance players trying to score browniw points, but that usually fades). Mining ships should be able to attempt tanking until help arrives and or get the hell out, or die. My idea about gankers bringing friends is that the wolf pack gank squad sounds like a very legitimate tactic to keep costs down and to increase gameplay. Just my opinion. I think it depends on the person. I have, on occasion, spend several hours, upwards of six or so, guarding miners. Usually while browsing fukung or doing some other mindless task like sorting MP3's and whatnot. Iv'e also been on the receiving end of a cloaked miner guard many times.
Just depends...you really never know... EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! |

Weiland Taur
Ceptic Innovations Rebel Alliance of New Eden
103
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 12:57:00 -
[920] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:Weiland Taur wrote:
From my own experience the attention span of a pvp pilot on overwatch during routine mining is the same as a small child in a toy store. No offense to the pvp pilot, but is just isn't what they want to be doing (other than new alliance players trying to score browniw points, but that usually fades). Mining ships should be able to attempt tanking until help arrives and or get the hell out, or die. My idea about gankers bringing friends is that the wolf pack gank squad sounds like a very legitimate tactic to keep costs down and to increase gameplay. Just my opinion.
All while fitting cargo expanding modules.
No. That makes absolutely no sense. If you fit nothing but cargo expanders you will have no tank and those lows would be better suited to MLU's to be honest. I don't think it has to be a black and white argument. No exhumer is going to stand up to a concerted effort to gank it, especially in nullsec but fitted properly I think it should have a prayer of assistance being able to reach it if coordinated properly. |

Lord Zim
1625
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 12:59:00 -
[921] - Quote
Weiland Taur wrote:Taiwanistan wrote:Weiland Taur wrote:
From my own experience the attention span of a pvp pilot on overwatch during routine mining is the same as a small child in a toy store. No offense to the pvp pilot, but is just isn't what they want to be doing (other than new alliance players trying to score browniw points, but that usually fades). Mining ships should be able to attempt tanking until help arrives and or get the hell out, or die. My idea about gankers bringing friends is that the wolf pack gank squad sounds like a very legitimate tactic to keep costs down and to increase gameplay. Just my opinion.
All while fitting cargo expanding modules. No. That makes absolutely no sense. If you fit nothing but cargo expanders you will have no tank and those lows would be better suited to MLU's to be honest. I don't think it has to be a black and white argument. No exhumer is going to stand up to a concerted effort to gank it, especially in nullsec but fitted properly I think it should have a prayer of assistance being able to reach it if coordinated properly. How many hulks have you seen, pre-buff, which did not have cargohold optimization rigs? Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

Bart Starr
Aggressive Structural Steel Expediting Services
112
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 13:07:00 -
[922] - Quote
TharOkha wrote: "They had more base EHP than most T2 Cruisers" They had also much more PG to use (thousand and more vs 40-50) = the ability to fit large tank extenders. While you can fit T2 cruiser to be good at tank and at the same time good dps, you could fit your hulk only for good tank or gtfo. Can you tell me then what options miners have in fitting if their only option was to fit the tank? What purpose had MLU if you couldnt fit them?
Not at all. Exhumers had plenty of tanking potential that was completely unrealized by most Exhumers. Look at the HG killboard. Pages and pages of cargo-rigged, cargo-fit Exhumers with empty mid slots. The tanking potential that was there was simply unused because the miners prioritized cargo or yield over it.
Saying that 'tanking is pointless' is just a copout that completely flies in the face of reality. Its simply miners making excuses for their bad choice.
"Might as well fit for max cargo and yield, because even if I tank, teh evil gankers will just bring 5 Catalysts and kill me!"
*Popped by single Catalyst*
Miner screams "NO FAIR!!!! My but hurts Need BUF"
|

Weiland Taur
Ceptic Innovations Rebel Alliance of New Eden
103
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 13:07:00 -
[923] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Weiland Taur wrote:Taiwanistan wrote:Weiland Taur wrote:
From my own experience the attention span of a pvp pilot on overwatch during routine mining is the same as a small child in a toy store. No offense to the pvp pilot, but is just isn't what they want to be doing (other than new alliance players trying to score browniw points, but that usually fades). Mining ships should be able to attempt tanking until help arrives and or get the hell out, or die. My idea about gankers bringing friends is that the wolf pack gank squad sounds like a very legitimate tactic to keep costs down and to increase gameplay. Just my opinion.
All while fitting cargo expanding modules. No. That makes absolutely no sense. If you fit nothing but cargo expanders you will have no tank and those lows would be better suited to MLU's to be honest. I don't think it has to be a black and white argument. No exhumer is going to stand up to a concerted effort to gank it, especially in nullsec but fitted properly I think it should have a prayer of assistance being able to reach it if coordinated properly. How many hulks have you seen, pre-buff, which did not have cargohold optimization rigs?
I'm simply stating from my experience as a miner among other things. As I have stated in other posts I think fitting an exhumer for yield/hauling is foolish. Those tasks can be better accomplished by jet canning in null and having teamwork in hisec. I think CCP went overboard on the EHP Buff but at the same time I think exhumers being t2 ships that take forever to get into and cost a fortune should have some survivability. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
195
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 13:40:00 -
[924] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:To be honest, I see plenty of Macks mining with Orca support for the extra ease of use.
So it's not just Macks anymore, now it's also about Orca. Whining is getting a bit out of control... |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
758
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 13:42:00 -
[925] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:To be honest, I see plenty of Macks mining with Orca support for the extra ease of use. So it's not just Macks anymore, now it's also about Orca. Whining is getting a bit out of control...
So is your awful posting & trolling. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Lord Zim
1625
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 13:42:00 -
[926] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:To be honest, I see plenty of Macks mining with Orca support for the extra ease of use. So it's not just Macks anymore, now it's also about Orca. Whining is getting a bit out of control... Nobody's whining about the orca just because it's mentioned in the same sentence as the mackinaw, stop grasping at straws. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

Lord Zim
1625
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 13:48:00 -
[927] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:To be honest, I see plenty of Macks mining with Orca support for the extra ease of use. So it's not just Macks anymore, now it's also about Orca. Whining is getting a bit out of control... Nobody's whining about the orca just because it's mentioned in the same sentence as the mackinaw, stop grasping at straws. "...with Orca support for the extra ease of use." HOLY **** SOMEONE SAID IT ADDED EASE OF USE THAT MUST BE WHINING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No, really, stop grasping at straws. The orca is an obvious part of a mining fleet, the only surprise in the picture pipa porto paints is where they used the mackinaw instead of the hulk. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

Pipa Porto
1169
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 13:52:00 -
[928] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:To be honest, I see plenty of Macks mining with Orca support for the extra ease of use. So it's not just Macks anymore, now it's also about Orca. Whining is getting a bit out of control... Nobody's whining about the orca just because it's mentioned in the same sentence as the mackinaw, stop grasping at straws. "...with Orca support for the extra ease of use."
And more evidence for the "Jorma is functionally illiterate" pile.
"for the extra ease of use" is discussing the Mackinaw over the Hulk. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|

ISD TYPE40
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1543

|
Posted - 2012.10.08 14:04:00 -
[929] - Quote
I think this thread has almost gone as far as it can but I'm not quite willing to close it just yet, if you can all get back on topic. This thread is not another "Issues with mining barges" thread, we already had that.
Since ganking isn't restricted to high sec nor is it restricted to barges/exhumers, lets see if we can't get the thread out of this very narrow channel it seems to have gotten wedged in, and back to something resembling its starting point. I genuinely wanted to see what would come of this topic, as I'm pretty sure many of you do. ISD Type40 Lt. Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1029
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 14:11:00 -
[930] - Quote
ISD TYPE40 wrote:I think this thread has almost gone as far as it can but I'm not quite willing to close it just yet, if you can all get back on topic. This thread is not another "Issues with mining barges" thread, we already had that.
Since ganking isn't restricted to high sec nor is it restricted to barges/exhumers, lets see if we can't get the thread out of this very narrow channel it seems to have gotten wedged in, and back to something resembling its starting point. I genuinely wanted to see what would come of this topic, as I'm pretty sure many of you do. First of all, you have no reason to close this thread, because the barge discussion serves as a source of supporting points for the main topic. As much as CCP wants us to only look at the read ahead of us, we're not that gullible. Terrible game changes don't seem so bad when you can't compare them to things that were done well, right?
Second of all, ganking is limited to high-sec. If you think otherwise, then you obviously don't play the game enough to understand what ganking is. Sorry if this hurts your feelings, but I calls them like I sees them. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |