| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Weiland Taur
Ceptic Innovations Rebel Alliance of New Eden
103
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 14:14:00 -
[931] - Quote
captain foivos wrote:Update: CCP has once again shat on ganking in order to turn highsec into a risk-free carebear paradise.
Retribution is all about balancing ships and what not, so why not balance out ganking a bit while you're at it? Over the last eight years, ganking has been nerfed nearly into the ground, with only a few select groups of highly skilled, well funded individuals continuing to separate stupid highsec mongoloids from their precious shiny things. Why not buff immoral activity for a change? Reward smart people for taking basic precautions against dying and loss, like not traveling around with billions in their hold, not clicking on the contracts in Jita local, and not traveling the Rancer Pipe with hundreds of PLEX in the cargo bay.
Ganking keeps getting hit with more and more nerfs: pretty soon there won't be that "cold harsh universe" left that CCP keeps going on about in their promos. EVE belongs to the violent, the venal, and the brilliant. Buff ganking. Nerf dumb people.
Per instructions, getting back on topic:
I think the problem here is that "the cold harsh universe," means so many different things to different people. The OP seems to be implying that it's a universe where death is common place, loss is common place and in fact is tilted toward the aggressor with all non "pvp," functions in eve being there simply as filler for killmails. I don't know if this is true or not. One of the issues is that while ganking is an absolutely sanctioned profession, it is one that is purely player driven, defined and created and thus I think up to the player to adjust to all CCP speed bumps thrown up. Much like the criminal in the real world, the burden of adjustment is on the ganker. If exhumers get a million EHP figure out how to break them or like other groups move onto to juicer and easier targets. |

Pipa Porto
1169
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 14:21:00 -
[932] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Got the numbers handy to show that the hulk recieved a buff & that the Mack recieved a significant buff? Or are you crying over the Skiff?
I don't right on hand, but last time I did the comparison (and this is from my falliable memory): 3 MLU Mackinaw is about 10k EHP better than the pre-buff Cargo hulk it replaces (with a better yield and cargo, no less) 2 MLU Mackinaw, which about matches the Cargo Hulk in yield, is some 25k EHP better. Untanked, the Mackinaw gained about 4500 EHP over the untanked, pre-buff Hulk (not counting the fact that the Mack has fewer modules to drop nor the fact that the Hulk it replaced reduced its tank further via cargo expansion).
Have you actually seen someone mining in a Skiff?
I mean, I've been complaining about the Skiff, but I've been complaining that the Mackinaw outshines or effectively ties it in every single way*.
*Jorma caveat: every way useful to miners. Speed will not be a valid counterargument, Jorma. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
195
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 14:24:00 -
[933] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Second of all, ganking is limited to high-sec. If you think otherwise, then you obviously don't play the game enough to understand what ganking is. Sorry if this hurts your feelings, but I calls them like I sees them.
Ganking =/= suicide ganking
Although suicide ganking involves ganking.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ganking |

Pipa Porto
1169
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 14:24:00 -
[934] - Quote
ISD TYPE40 wrote:I think this thread has almost gone as far as it can but I'm not quite willing to close it just yet, if you can all get back on topic. This thread is not another "Issues with mining barges" thread, we already had that.
Since ganking isn't restricted to high sec nor is it restricted to barges/exhumers, lets see if we can't get the thread out of this very narrow channel it seems to have gotten wedged in, and back to something resembling its starting point. I genuinely wanted to see what would come of this topic, as I'm pretty sure many of you do.
What.
Ganking is common shorthand for Suicide Ganking. The OP makes it clear that that is the focus of this thread. Name for me the mechanic by which one can Suicide Gank outside of HS.
And, until CCP fixes the barges or makes it official by putting up a Hello Kitty Online sign above their doors, you're going to see a lot of threads, because they're laughably overpowered. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
1171
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 14:37:00 -
[935] - Quote
Weiland Taur wrote:Per instructions, getting back on topic:
I think the problem here is that "the cold harsh universe," means so many different things to different people. The OP seems to be implying that it's a universe where death is common place, loss is common place and in fact is tilted toward the aggressor with all non "pvp," functions in eve being there simply as filler for killmails. I don't know if this is true or not. One of the issues is that while ganking is an absolutely sanctioned profession, it is one that is purely player driven, defined and created and thus I think up to the player to adjust to all CCP speed bumps thrown up. Much like the criminal in the real world, the burden of adjustment is on the ganker. If exhumers get a million EHP figure out how to break them or like other groups move onto to juicer and easier targets.
Who's saying we want things tilted towards the aggressor? Mining barges could be tanked to absolutely be unprofitable to gank (and as I have yet to see a suicide gank killmail of a well tanked Hulk pre-buff, I don't know that any well tanked hulks were killed). Mining barges could be flown in such a way as to be immune to ganks. 3 webs and an "align to SS" mean you cannot get caught (unless by Jorma's imaginary km/s cloaked ship).
We want things tilted away from stupid and lazy people and towards smart and/or industrious people (fitting a tank being smart, flying aligned and watching the screen being industrious).
Crimewatch 2.0 is protecting stupid people (by making it legal to re-flip cans, thus eliminating can-flipping as a profession) (by virtually eliminating Missionbear ganking [non-suicide] as a profession), and rewarding lazy people (Ganking Freighters will be significantly harder, so no more making 2 trips for your 3b in goods) etc. This hurts the smart and industrious people by making their intelligence and industry provide them with less benefit over the stupid and lazy people.
Here's the problem with your "adapt" speach. Suicide Gankers have adapted to some 20 nerfs to their profession in the past. When is it enough?
Ninja Looters have adapted to many nerfs to their profession in the past. When is it enough?
Can Flippers have been eliminated by the Mack. (Except for the few who go after brand new people for lulz).
Saying "adapt or move on" doesn't work when the nerfs quite simply eliminate the profession or the possibility of any sort of profit. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1033
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 14:50:00 -
[936] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Second of all, ganking is limited to high-sec. If you think otherwise, then you obviously don't play the game enough to understand what ganking is. Sorry if this hurts your feelings, but I calls them like I sees them. Ganking =/= suicide ganking Although suicide ganking involves ganking. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ganking Ganking means suicide-ganking. Anything else is conventional pvp. In EVE, ganking means destroying someone despite NPC intervention. When I bomb someone in who is entering a wormhole, I am not ganking. When I attack a FW enemy in a plex, I am not ganking. When I engage a war target that undocks from a station, I am not ganking. Anyone who does pvp in EVE is able to make this distinction. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
762
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 14:51:00 -
[937] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Crimewatch 2.0 is protecting stupid people and rewarding lazy people. This hurts the smart and industrious people by making their intelligence and industry provide them with less benefit over the stupid and lazy people.
I believe it is time to update my sig. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Pipa Porto
1171
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:01:00 -
[938] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Crimewatch 2.0 is protecting stupid people and rewarding lazy people. This hurts the smart and industrious people by making their intelligence and industry provide them with less benefit over the stupid and lazy people. I believe it is time to update my sig.
You don't believe in attribution?  EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
763
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:03:00 -
[939] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Crimewatch 2.0 is protecting stupid people and rewarding lazy people. This hurts the smart and industrious people by making their intelligence and industry provide them with less benefit over the stupid and lazy people. I believe it is time to update my sig. You don't believe in attribution?  P.S. If attribution is a dealbreaker, don't attribute.
Not usually no. I can make an exception for you though. Crimewatch 2.0: Protecting stupid people & rewarding lazy people. This hurts the smart & industrious people by making their intelligence & industry provide them with less benefit over the stupid & lazy people. ~ Ruby Porto |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
195
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:07:00 -
[940] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Ganking means suicide-ganking. Anything else is conventional pvp. In EVE, ganking means destroying someone despite NPC intervention. When I bomb someone in who is entering a wormhole, I am not ganking. When I attack a FW enemy in a plex, I am not ganking. When I engage a war target that undocks from a station, I am not ganking. Anyone who does pvp in EVE is able to make this distinction.
That's narrow minded definition. |

Lord Zim
1625
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:08:00 -
[941] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Ganking is common shorthand for Suicide Ganking. The OP makes it clear that that is the focus of this thread. Name for me the mechanic by which one can Suicide Gank outside of HS. Nyncing.
Edit: And while it may be common shorthand, it's a bit too narrow a definition. You can also gank outside of suicide ganking, if you gank someone chances are you take them unawares or unable to defend themselves, the difference between it and suicide ganking is that you die in the process.
meaning a BC ganking a freighter or a JF is a perfectly acceptable definition, same with a BC ganking a dread f.ex. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
66
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:22:00 -
[942] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Got the numbers handy to show that the hulk recieved a buff & that the Mack recieved a significant buff? Or are you crying over the Skiff? I don't right on hand, but last time I did the comparison (and this is from my falliable memory): 3 MLU Mackinaw is about 10k EHP better than the pre-buff Cargo hulk it replaces (with a better yield and cargo, no less) 2 MLU Mackinaw, which about matches the Cargo Hulk in yield, is some 25k EHP better. Untanked, the Mackinaw gained about 4500 EHP over the untanked, pre-buff Hulk (not counting the fact that the Mack has fewer modules to drop nor the fact that the Hulk it replaced reduced its tank further via cargo expansion). Have you actually seen someone mining in a Skiff? I mean, I've been complaining about the Skiff, but I've been complaining that the Mackinaw outshines or effectively ties it in every single way*. *Jorma caveat: every way useful to miners. Speed will not be a valid counterargument, Jorma.
you cry about everything and in the most narrow minded fashion. Try to find a game you don't feel the need to consatntly cry about. EVE is obviously not meant for you. Devs have already said miner ganking was never supposed to be profitable.
Trying to argue with the no-lifer ruby porto is like arguing with a radio. The kid has mental problems so its no wonder he lives on the forums of a video game arguing with everyone and everything over his stupid vision of what he thinks EVE is supposed to be. Get **** on by devs. |

Pipa Porto
1172
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:24:00 -
[943] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Ganking is common shorthand for Suicide Ganking. The OP makes it clear that that is the focus of this thread. Name for me the mechanic by which one can Suicide Gank outside of HS. Nyncing.
And what mechanic provides the guarantee of suicide? I know it may be splitting hairs, but there's a difference between discussing the mechanics of suicide ganking and the tactical implications of jumping dreads into a situation wherein they have very little hope of surviving their siege cycle.
Quote:Edit: And while it may be common shorthand, it's a bit too narrow a definition. You can also gank outside of suicide ganking, if you gank someone chances are you take them unawares or unable to defend themselves, the difference between it and suicide ganking is that you die in the process.
meaning a BC ganking a freighter or a JF is a perfectly acceptable definition, same with a BC ganking a dread f.ex.
I agree that it's too narrow, but it's fairly clear that when the OP says "ganking" he means "Suicide Ganking." EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Lord Zim
1625
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:25:00 -
[944] - Quote
I'm sure we'll listen to a gimmick NPC account called "nerf burger". Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
66
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:27:00 -
[945] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Ganking is common shorthand for Suicide Ganking. The OP makes it clear that that is the focus of this thread. Name for me the mechanic by which one can Suicide Gank outside of HS. Nyncing. And what mechanic provides the guarantee of suicide? I know it may be splitting hairs, but there's a difference between discussing the mechanics of suicide ganking and the tactical implications of jumping dreads into a situation wherein they have very little hope of surviving their siege cycle. Quote:Edit: And while it may be common shorthand, it's a bit too narrow a definition. You can also gank outside of suicide ganking, if you gank someone chances are you take them unawares or unable to defend themselves, the difference between it and suicide ganking is that you die in the process.
meaning a BC ganking a freighter or a JF is a perfectly acceptable definition, same with a BC ganking a dread f.ex. I agree that it's too narrow, but it's fairly clear that when the OP says "ganking" he means "Suicide Ganking."
your personal definitions are almost always narrow minded. No surprise there. Try to find a game you don't feel the need to constantly cry about. How can anyone take you seriously when you have a 50 post per day average and sometimes spike up to 150 posts in a single day? Don't we have enough overly-vocal morons on these forums? |

baltec1
Bat Country
2413
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:34:00 -
[946] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote: Devs have already said miner ganking was never supposed to be profitable.  They said ganking the hull shouldnt be profitable. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5039
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:36:00 -
[947] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:And what mechanic provides the guarantee of suicide? I know it may be splitting hairs, but there's a difference between discussing the mechanics of suicide ganking and the tactical implications of jumping dreads into a situation wherein they have very little hope of surviving their siege cycle.
Old-school nyncing hasn't been a big thing since fighter bombers were added (i.e. drop a Nyx, align, melt JF in <1 minute, warp to safe) but losing the dread in the process is usually inevitable if you're doing it on a deathstar POS.
Also, much unlike hisec miners who refused to adapt, jump freighter pilots simply learned to light their own cynos on stations rather than jumping blind to beacons. This post was crafted by a member of the Goonswarm Federation posting cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online posting.
fofofofofo |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
66
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:41:00 -
[948] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:baltec1 wrote:Nerf Burger wrote: Devs have already said miner ganking was never supposed to be profitable.  They said ganking the hull shouldnt be profitable. try harder to split some hairs, scrub. Why is it always the same no-life losers defending ganking like pipa porto and baltec? Such a hilariously witty & original comment.
the fact that you are in goonswarm defending skilless, riskless "pvp" and are quoting someone as stupid as pipa porto is so typical it is hilarious.  |

Lord Zim
1625
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:43:00 -
[949] - Quote
Say bye bye to nerf burger's posts, I guess. Again. vOv Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2414
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:44:00 -
[950] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:
try harder to split some hairs, scrub.
Why is it always the same no-life losers defending ganking like pipa porto and baltec?
Why do you feel the need to throw personal insults at people?
Rather than raging at the screen how about you sit there, think for a bit and then join in this debate using some logic to argue your points. So far the fact that you have only posted insults shows everyone that you cannot counter the points we are maing on how some of the recent changes are damaging the game as a whole.
Unlike you, I care about more than my own little world in this game. |

Brooks Puuntai
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
849
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:45:00 -
[951] - Quote
Why do I get the feeling there is a mod deleting posts. 
Show yourself! |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
765
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:46:00 -
[952] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:baltec1 wrote:Nerf Burger wrote: Devs have already said miner ganking was never supposed to be profitable.  They said ganking the hull shouldnt be profitable. try harder to split some hairs, scrub. Why is it always the same no-life losers defending ganking like pipa porto and baltec? Such a hilariously witty & original comment. the fact that you are in goonswarm defending skilless, riskless "pvp" and are quoting someone as stupid as pipa porto is so typical it is hilarious. 
Yes, tell us all about the riskless nature of the suicide ganking profession & how it takes less skill than pressing F1 in an ice field once an hour. Crimewatch 2.0: Protecting stupid people & rewarding lazy people. This hurts the smart & industrious people by making their intelligence & industry provide them with less benefit over the stupid & lazy people. ~ Ruby Porto |

baltec1
Bat Country
2414
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:47:00 -
[953] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:Why do I get the feeling there is a mod deleting posts.  Show yourself!
When you see him its already too late |

Lord Zim
1627
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:50:00 -
[954] - Quote
NPC rabble rabble rabble Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

Caellach Marellus
Aideron Technologies
600
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:51:00 -
[955] - Quote
captain foivos wrote:with only a few select groups of highly skilled
They did.
Get good at it. Enjoy your gaming.
http://northern-goblin.blogspot.com |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
765
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:51:00 -
[956] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:How can anyone take such losers seriously?
We don't actually... Take you seriously. Thanks for asking that question. Crimewatch 2.0: Protecting stupid people & rewarding lazy people. This hurts the smart & industrious people by making their intelligence & industry provide them with less benefit over the stupid & lazy people. ~ Ruby Porto |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
66
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:55:00 -
[957] - Quote
Caellach Marellus wrote:captain foivos wrote:with only a few select groups of highly skilled They did. Get good at it.
thats what I said. You have to wonder about the intelligence and "skill" of people who prefer their "pvp" to consist of gangbanging helpless targets that don't stand a chance. Hilarious how they like to claim their victims are the stupid ones. EVE to me seems like the last bastion of the stupid "pvper". Now they are flooding the forums with a river of tears that their riskless, brainless "pvp" is being taken away.
Ganker and canflipper tears so delicious. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
765
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 15:57:00 -
[958] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:thats what I said. You have to wonder about the intelligence and "skill" of people who prefer their "pvp" to consist of gangbanging helpless targets that won't fight back.
Ganker and canflipper tears so delicious.
E-bushido in this game only guarantees one result. Crimewatch 2.0: Protecting stupid people & rewarding lazy people. This hurts the smart & industrious people by making their intelligence & industry provide them with less benefit over the stupid & lazy people. ~ Ruby Porto |

baltec1
Bat Country
2415
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 16:03:00 -
[959] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:
thats what I said. You have to wonder about the intelligence and "skill" of people who prefer their "pvp" to consist of gangbanging helpless targets that don't stand a chance. Hilarious how they like to claim their victims are the stupid ones. EVE to me seems like the last bastion of the stupid "pvper". Now they are flooding the forums with a river of tears that their riskless, brainless "pvp" is being taken away.
Ganker and canflipper tears so delicious.
This from someone whos only contribution to this thread is nothing but insults hurled at players who do things you don't like. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1402
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 17:52:00 -
[960] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:
thats what I said. You have to wonder about the intelligence and "skill" of people who prefer their "pvp" to consist of gangbanging helpless targets that don't stand a chance. Hilarious how they like to claim their victims are the stupid ones. EVE to me seems like the last bastion of the stupid "pvper". Now they are flooding the forums with a river of tears that their riskless, brainless "pvp" is being taken away.
Ganker and canflipper tears so delicious.
This from someone whos only contribution to this thread is nothing but insults hurled at players who do things you don't like. Yeah, who needs things like information and understanding when you can just call somebody a sissy on the interwebs?  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |