Well if i had actually insinuated that my opponent was a rapist then I would consider my argument a bad one. But considering that's not even remotely close to what I did, means I don't.

is this another situation where you have forgotten the thing you posted like we had a few pages ago

what you posted is right here in black and white you're not going to be able to pretend you didn't

Nope, I actually re-read the statement several times within the last 5 minutes just to ensure that what I'm being accused of didn't actually happen and every way that I look at it, what you accused me of is not possible.

What the hell happened to this thread?

perhaps you should read it a few more times then and then once you get why your post was so offensive, then go read your post about "well i had to do it, it was the only way to win an argument over internet spaceships"

you also have failed to wrestle with how offensive your comparison of the loser of an internet spaceship pvp encounter in a game based on having losers of internet spaceship pvp encounters to victims of sexual assault that has been pointed out repeatedly

perhaps you should mull that over as well, while i contemplate how awful a person i am because i victim-blamed when i told my brother that he lost a game of chess because he kept walking his important pieces into my pawns

i didn't have to kill his queen, it is truly wrong to tell him he is to blame for losing his queen. he is the victim here.

Done. Now, I completely understand why you are offended by my argument. I'm not saying saying the case I made wasn't extreme. But it was extreme on purpose. The argument that many gankers have made that its the victims fault that they got killed is as equally offensive an extreme to me. I know of no other example that is not as equally extreme that would convey how vile the argument that the victim is at fault for anything is.

he is Todd Akin

What the hell happened to this thread?

if it's a legitimate gank then the freighter has ways to shut that whole process down

Done. Now, I completely understand why you are offended by my argument. I'm not saying saying the case I made wasn't extreme. But it was extreme on purpose. The argument that many gankers have made that its the victims fault that they got killed is as equally offensive an extreme to me. I know of no other example that is not as equally extreme that would convey how vile the argument that the victim is at fault for anything is.

I'd also like to point out that all of your examples to date are pretty disingenuous. For starters the participants of both tic tac toe and chess are playing under the guise that there will be a winner and a loser. On the other hand a person playing in hi sec is under the guise that his game time should be allowed to be spent playing the game in a solo manner if he so chooses.

Oh? Please enlighten me as to the process that a freighter can be completely invulnerable to a gank?

if it's a legitimate gank then the freighter has ways to shut that whole process down

You are correct, the ganker is not responsible for that. What they are responsible for is pulling the trigger.

Or are you telling me that victim blaming suddenly became a valid argument and that you believe such things like women are responsible for sexual assault because they didn't dress appropriately?

You are correct, the ganker is not responsible for that. What they are responsible for is pulling the trigger.

Or are you telling me that victim blaming suddenly became a valid argument and that you believe such things like women are responsible for sexual assault because they didn't dress appropriately?

You are correct, the ganker is not responsible for that. What they are responsible for is pulling the trigger.

Or are you telling me that victim blaming suddenly became a valid argument and that you believe such things like women are responsible for sexual assault because they didn't dress appropriately?

You are correct, the ganker is not responsible for that. What they are responsible for is pulling the trigger.

Or are you telling me that victim blaming suddenly became a valid argument and that you believe such things like women are responsible for sexual assault because they didn't dress appropriately?

Or are you telling me that victim blaming suddenly became a valid argument and that you believe such things like women are responsible for sexual assault because they didn't dress appropriately?

You are correct, the ganker is not responsible for that. What they are responsible for is pulling the trigger.

Or are you telling me that victim blaming suddenly became a valid argument and that you believe such things like women are responsible for sexual assault because they didn't dress appropriately?

You are correct, the ganker is not responsible for that. What they are responsible for is pulling the trigger.

Or are you telling me that victim blaming suddenly became a valid argument and that you believe such things like women are responsible for sexual assault because they didn't dress appropriately?

You are correct, the ganker is not responsible for that. What they are responsible for is pulling the trigger.

Or are you telling me that victim blaming suddenly became a valid argument and that you believe such things like women are responsible for sexual assault because they didn't dress appropriately?

Or are you telling me that victim blaming suddenly became a valid argument and that you believe such things like women are responsible for sexual assault because they didn't dress appropriately?