EVE Search - Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 136 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 6 post(s)
EvilweaselFinance BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation 551	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:24:13 - [1591] - Quote KC Kamikaze wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: could you call yourselves "the honey badger coalition" when you all move into null so we can repeat the last time we squashed a bunch of incompetents like a bug who thought that quantity was quality Oh I dunno that I've ever run into your corp before, but i'll make a note so when we roll into you and watch you dock up cause you don't want your **** pushed in I can remind you of that big hammer you own. ok, good luck with that, see you soon
Princess Cherista State War Academy Caldari State 16	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:24:43 - [1592] - Quote Summer 2015: our inties and nullified no-commit fits will blot out the sun
Kah'Les hirr Northern Coalition. 7	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:24:56 - [1593] - Quote Lena Lazair wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: i didn't say take it, i said squash you What are you going to squash? Small alliances won't drop ihubs or station eggs. They'll have a TCU and a few POS's. When you come through and flip the TCU they'll evacuate any POS's they need to and then log off for a week. You'll "squash" the TCU, maybe explode some POS's (if you REALLY want to commit a fleet to that), and then leave. Next week they'll login, flip your TCU back, and go on with life as normal. Unless CFC plans to go out and defend every single TCU timer in every constellation they "squashed", you'll be nothing more than a minor annoyance a few weeks of the year. Don't even know how SOV,iHUB and POS work. Good luck making ISK out of a system with no ihub and no sov lvl.
Sentinel Eeex Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation 140	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:25:58 - [1594] - Quote Ok, the great plan is to turn "EVE Online" into "Roaming Gangs Online". Got it.
Jenn aSide Smokin Aces. 10047	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:28:10 - [1595] - Quote Kah'Les wrote: Lena Lazair wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: i didn't say take it, i said squash you What are you going to squash? Small alliances won't drop ihubs or station eggs. They'll have a TCU and a few POS's. When you come through and flip the TCU they'll evacuate any POS's they need to and then log off for a week. You'll "squash" the TCU, maybe explode some POS's (if you REALLY want to commit a fleet to that), and then leave. Next week they'll login, flip your TCU back, and go on with life as normal. Unless CFC plans to go out and defend every single TCU timer in every constellation they "squashed", you'll be nothing more than a minor annoyance a few weeks of the year. Don't even know how SOV,iHUB and POS work. Good luck making ISK out of a system with no ihub and no sov lvl. Didn't you know? null sec just bleeds isk out of every oriface. All you gotta do is got to any belt and an Officer spawn is waiting for you, don't even have to shoot it , it will self destruct for you. -signed, Everyone who has never been to null but thinks everyone in null is rich.
Akrasjel Lanate Naquatech Conglomerate Naquatech Syndicate 1739	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:29:05 - [1596] - Quote This is not all yet... there still will be Phase Three Akrasjel Lanate General Director(CEO) of Naquatech Conglomerate Executor of Naquatech Syndicate Citizen of Solitude
Kyle Meshuggah No Vacancies 12	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:29:29 - [1597] - Quote This is SUPERB! I'm really impressed with this new system. I think the core principals and mechanics behind it are sound and will make for a more exciting and rewarding null sec. The minutia and peripherals of it will be refined and tweaked over time and with testing (and there's some real potential there for new, more dynamic and interesting gameplay/tactics/fails) but at the core of it, this new Null Sec/Sov system is SUPERB. As a wormholer, I look forward to 3rd partying the **** out of nullsec engagements in Summer 2015 :) http://i.imgur.com/8tmu8E2.jpg
Akrasjel Lanate Naquatech Conglomerate Naquatech Syndicate 1739	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:31:01 - [1598] - Quote Also... Renter Empires Akrasjel Lanate General Director(CEO) of Naquatech Conglomerate Executor of Naquatech Syndicate Citizen of Solitude
Lena Lazair Khanid Irregulars Khanid's Legion 338	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:32:16 - [1599] - Quote Kah'Les wrote: Don't even know how SOV,iHUB and POS work. Good luck making ISK out of a system with no ihub and no sov lvl. If you think this change is to attract people who want to min/max ISK to go claim a foothold in null, you are pretty much missing the entire point of who this is intended to appeal to. This change is NOT so that everyone gets to have station eggs. It is NOT so that everyone gets to own R64 moons. It is NOT so that everyone can go AFK anom rat at 30m a tick. This change is so that smaller groups with an identity and a desire to have fun can go easily/feasibly carve out a couple of systems in **** null that ALREADY nobody wants and nobody uses, without having to join a giant blue coaltion or pay rent to anyone. And then stick their name on the map. And then have very little incentive or ability for someone else to come screw with that in any meaningful way unless those interlocutors actually intend to move into that system and evict the residents. In short, WH mentality but for null. It's telling when roaming WH fights are far more prevalent than roaming null fights. WH evictions are very different and considerably more rare than the usual WH "gudfite". Groups choose to live in C2 and C3 WH's all the time, despite the fact that the ISK efficiency, especially as compared to risk, is pretty "meh".
Jenn aSide Smokin Aces. 10047	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:32:27 - [1600] - Quote Sentinel Eeex wrote: Ok, the great plan is to turn "EVE Online" into ~~"Roaming Gangs Online"~~ "Even Bluer Donuts Online". Got it. Fixed. Will be funny to watch the post June disappointment set in with the unrealistically optimistic crowd.
Speedkermit Damo Demonic Retribution 402	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:33:37 - [1601] - Quote EvilweaselFinance wrote: KC Kamikaze wrote: The "Protection" of tomorrow you speak of is todays rental agreement. The new system will be great. Small groups can claim and hold sov. We have multiboxing alt corps holding down wormholes .. now some of those and more can move to holding their own piece of null. The only people who don't win are big coalitions .. and you have more than the means and resources to survive. what makes you think i won't squash you for funsies we spent three months squashing anyone who dared mine gallente ice in highsec, what makes you think that every shitlord who raises a flag isn't going to look like a nail to swing my massive hammer at More fun for you then, so what exactly are you crying about? Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen.
Tiberian Deci Sleeper Slumber Party Test Alliance Please Ignore 116	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:35:00 - [1602] - Quote Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: Small gang will go around flagging up every structure an alliance owns to make them chase their own tails. PIZZA is gonna be busy
Jenn aSide Smokin Aces. 10047	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:35:14 - [1603] - Quote Speedkermit Damo wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: KC Kamikaze wrote: The "Protection" of tomorrow you speak of is todays rental agreement. The new system will be great. Small groups can claim and hold sov. We have multiboxing alt corps holding down wormholes .. now some of those and more can move to holding their own piece of null. The only people who don't win are big coalitions .. and you have more than the means and resources to survive. what makes you think i won't squash you for funsies we spent three months squashing anyone who dared mine gallente ice in highsec, what makes you think that every shitlord who raises a flag isn't going to look like a nail to swing my massive hammer at More fun for you then, so what exactly are you crying about? The fact that the idea is dumb and will be a waste of time? Just because someone benefits from a situation doesn't mean that can't see what's wrong with it.
KC Kamikaze Blue-Fire 75	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:35:45 - [1604] - Quote EvilweaselFinance wrote: KC Kamikaze wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: could you call yourselves "the honey badger coalition" when you all move into null so we can repeat the last time we squashed a bunch of incompetents like a bug who thought that quantity was quality Oh I dunno that I've ever run into your corp before, but i'll make a note so when we roll into you and watch you dock up cause you don't want your ** pushed in I can remind you of that big hammer you own. ok, good luck with that, see you soon LMAO so i looked you up. Your corp has 16 members. Hope... PRAY... we don't f'king run into you cause i'll SRP our entire fleet out of my own pocket if necessary to make you cry like the little renter *** you are. I just want to point out some basic killboard stats: Buttecorp INC: Destroyed 2.19b Lost: 3.26b Blue-Fire: Destroyed 2.05t Lost 690b By the looks of it if we brought the fight you would get your s_hit pushed in as i would expect of any typical nullbear corp hiding behind a big alliance ticker. https://zkillboard.com/corporation/911536135/ https://zkillboard.com/corporation/98122843/
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30755	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:35:59 - [1605] - Quote I'm not sure lengthy explanations in this thread are likely, when it would be better to use them as material for FF. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Herzog Wolfhammer Sigma Special Tactics Group 6339	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:36:09 - [1606] - Quote Well... Having trespassed all over nullsec and made observations of the status quo now, and having done it since before Dominion knew the status quo then, I can say that given the butthurt level that has progressed to the point of complete butthole separation (and said buttholes apparently a budding off process of "the usual crowd" and now more have appeared) , these changes will be a good thing. Directed complaints from a large alliance coughgoons should not change this vector considering they are one of the Uncle Bobs. Anyway, I'm glad to see the comment "weaponized boredom" appear in the dev blog. The Great Malais of 2014 was for the most part a final result of Eve game mechanics centered on being by and for the game style of preventing the game from being played. The dev blog is like the rainbow after the great biblical flood. Nullsec needs to be shaken up. I see "they usual crowd" complaining loudly though, and makes me wonder why since they always write about highsec. As for Trollceptors, so what. I have a lossmail of a ceptor getting insta'ed before the dictor could get a scram on it. It CAN be done I saw it myself. Oh, you don't want to have to camp your own gates now? CCP is obviously not going to get rid of gates (even though I insist that if all ships could warp on their own it would be an epic breakout of the Malais) and people just gotta death camp them so here you go, it's what you want: you now have a REAL reason to camp them and kill everything that is not blue. (But you never know if they stage in your system and then strike!! Bwa ha ha ha ha Shoot all teh things) But you know, I think that these SOV changes will be the greatest buff to highsec to ever occur in the history of the game. Why? Well, it's going to be hard defending your SOV while running that highsec incursion alt. It's going to be hard having to camp that gate for trollceptors instead of ganking freighters in the highsec pipelines. And even harder having to camp that gate andrat to get sec status back up. Do iHubs store loot? I don't know you see I have only flown past them because I have not bent the knee to nullsec alliances. But I will look forward to the "just came back to Eve and my stuff is gone" threads. Which are not that different from the "Just came back to Eve and I can't get my stuff because they camped me into the station" threads. You know - gotta get those killz! Hey everybody! Live meat! Zombie swarm! And here I was expecting something like "if you enter a system while not in the SOV holding alliance you instantly explode and your corpse is used to power the moon goo pumps". But it would appear that CCP has finally noticed that more people "have tried Eve" than actually played it. Obligatory: My god, it's full of tears... Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Kah'Les hirr Northern Coalition. 8	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:37:01 - [1607] - Quote Lena Lazair wrote: Kah'Les wrote: Don't even know how SOV,iHUB and POS work. Good luck making ISK out of a system with no ihub and no sov lvl. If you think this change is to attract people who want to min/max ISK to go claim a foothold in null, you are pretty much missing the entire point of who this is intended to appeal to. This change is NOT so that everyone gets to have station eggs. It is NOT so that everyone gets to own R64 moons. It is NOT so that everyone can go AFK anom rat at 30m a tick. This change is so that smaller groups with an identity and a desire to have fun can go easily/feasibly carve out a couple of systems in **** null that ALREADY nobody wants and nobody uses, without having to join a giant blue coaltion or pay rent to anyone. And then stick their name on the map. And then have very little incentive or ability for someone else to come screw with that in any meaningful way unless those interlocutors actually intend to move into that system and evict the residents. In short, WH mentality but for null. It's telling when roaming WH fights are far more prevalent than roaming null fights. WH evictions are very different and considerably more rare than the usual WH "gudfite". Groups choose to live in C2 and C3 WH's all the time, despite the fact that the ISK efficiency, especially as compared to risk, is pretty "meh". And if you want to do this it's nothing stoping you already you can set up POS in any system you want don't need SOV and I know small gangs that shut down systems like this already, The fact that you already not doing it show how much you are comidet to this idea already. It's just a fantasie, if this was your goal you would have already done it.
Eli Apol Pro Synergy 174	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:37:43 - [1608] - Quote Jenn aSide wrote: The fact that the idea is dumb and will be a waste of time? Just because someone benefits from a situation doesn't mean that can't see what's wrong with it. So small gangs are gonna be having fun, big alliances are gonna be having fun waving around their giant 'hammers' and yet this is a dumb waste of time? I want them to take away our fun and make us sit in stations ship spinning everyday instead of adding content :(
Arrendis GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 243	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:38:06 - [1609] - Quote Soldarius wrote: So, I have another idea. You know how CBCs and Command Ships can fit links ~~but never do~~? Perhaps only CBCs should be able to fit an Entosis Link. Would give them a purpose in life since they have had no purpose since 2013. They can also fit MMJDs. So bombers? What bombers? I just jumped away. Jumping does not break locks unless you jump out of locking range. vOv edit: added CS Given the spool-up time on an MMJD, jumping away from bombers won't be as easy as you make it out to be - especially not since any decent bomber FC will just have a second squad ready 100km ahead of you.
Gericht Delusions of Adequacy Get Off My Lawn 1	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:39:47 - [1610] - Quote My two cents on this. I'd make the entosis link incompatible with afterburners, mjd's and mwd's which would prevent the concept of the trollceptor. And in the event of a tie on the combat for a station or ihub I would automatically make the defenders win to allow a bit of home field advantage.
Benny Ohu Chaotic Tranquility Warp to Cyno. 4302	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:40:45 - [1611] - Quote KC Kamikaze wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: KC Kamikaze wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: could you call yourselves "the honey badger coalition" when you all move into null so we can repeat the last time we squashed a bunch of incompetents like a bug who thought that quantity was quality Oh I dunno that I've ever run into your corp before, but i'll make a note so when we roll into you and watch you dock up cause you don't want your ** pushed in I can remind you of that big hammer you own. ok, good luck with that, see you soon LMAO so i looked you up. Your corp has 16 members. Hope... PRAY... we don't f'king run into you cause i'll SRP our entire fleet out of my own pocket if necessary to make you cry like the little renter * you are. I just want to point out some basic killboard stats: Buttecorp INC: Destroyed 2.19b Lost: 3.26b Blue-Fire: Destroyed 2.05t Lost 690b By the looks of it if we brought the fight you would get your s_hit pushed in as i would expect of any typical nullbear corp hiding behind a big alliance ticker. https://zkillboard.com/corporation/911536135/ https://zkillboard.com/corporation/98122843/ Your are a small fish in a big pond with *** envy. oh dear!
Arrendis GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 243	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:40:58 - [1612] - Quote Anhenka wrote: KC Kamikaze wrote: The "Protection" of tomorrow you speak of is todays rental agreement. The new system will be great. Small groups can claim and hold sov. We have multiboxing alt corps holding down wormholes .. now some of those and more can move to holding their own piece of null. The only people who don't win are big coalitions .. and you have more than the means and resources to survive. Meh. Large scale stability and stable logistic chains, along with the ability to swamp small enemies with the people they don't need for immediate self defense means that big coalitions are going to come out of this even better than the little guys. When the bar is lowered to near 0 for taking system, the more force you can apply, the more space you can steamroll in a smaller amount of time. And the higher the bar is raised, the more likely only the big blocs are going to have the ability to overcome it. Really, there's a reason this kind of equilibrium state has been a recurring theme in history. No problem has ever existed where being able to devote more brainpower to finding a solution, and more manpower to executing that solution, hasn't produced a more effective solution. Doesn't happen.
Arrendis GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 243	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:43:15 - [1613] - Quote KC Kamikaze wrote: LMAO so i looked you up. Your corp has 16 members. Hope... PRAY... we don't f'king run into you cause i'll SRP our entire fleet out of my own pocket if necessary to make you cry like the little renter *** you are. I just want to point out some basic killboard stats: Buttecorp INC: Destroyed 2.19b Lost: 3.26b Blue-Fire: Destroyed 2.05t Lost 690b By the looks of it if we brought the fight you would get your s_hit pushed in as i would expect of any typical nullbear corp hiding behind a big alliance ticker. https://zkillboard.com/corporation/911536135/ https://zkillboard.com/corporation/98122843/ Your are a small fish in a big pond with *** envy. Now look up 'Goonswarm Federation', and while you're at it, 'The Clusterfuck Coalition'.
afkalt Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 803	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:43:19 - [1614] - Quote Gericht wrote: My two cents on this. I'd make the entosis link incompatible with afterburners, mjd's and mwd's which would prevent the concept of the trollceptor. And in the event of a tie on the combat for a station or ihub I would automatically make the defenders win to allow a bit of home field advantage. Why? 100m loot pinyatas are delicious. These things will die in fires. No-one in their right mind will do this if people show up to defend. If they don't...then they've no right to have it in the first instance.
Jenn aSide Smokin Aces. 10049	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:44:22 - [1615] - Quote Eli Apol wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: The fact that the idea is dumb and will be a waste of time? Just because someone benefits from a situation doesn't mean that can't see what's wrong with it. So small gangs are gonna be having fun, big alliances are gonna be having fun waving around their giant 'hammers' and yet this is a dumb waste of time? I want them to take away our fun and make us sit in stations ship spinning everyday instead of adding content :( This is what I mean by "unrealistically optimistic". I've learned that nothing you say dissuades people like that, because they are used to believing what they want. Not even evidence works. I had this same conversation 2 dozen times before Dominion and I ain't doing it again lol.
Starrakatt Hunter Killers. Forsaken Asylum 227	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:44:45 - [1616] - Quote Princess Cherista wrote: Summer 2015: our inties and nullified no-commit fits will blot out the sun And thus it begins. As a (Hisec) merc, most, if not all, Nulsec entities always shrugged and sported dismissive comments on how mercs were not affecting them, only killing the Hisec bads/random nul ratters, depending where the mercs were operating from. With the Entosis Ceptor, being cheap ships and with minimal risks, even scrub Hisec mercs can go down in nul and 'affect', read ** them off no end (the dream of any merc's client), said entities by trolling their Sov timers, yes. While they can do squat to us, in our Hisec safety. Thank you CCP, THANK YOU.** Forsaken Asylum's ways
Speedkermit Damo Demonic Retribution 404	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:45:22 - [1617] - Quote Jenn aSide wrote: Speedkermit Damo wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: KC Kamikaze wrote: The "Protection" of tomorrow you speak of is todays rental agreement. The new system will be great. Small groups can claim and hold sov. We have multiboxing alt corps holding down wormholes .. now some of those and more can move to holding their own piece of null. The only people who don't win are big coalitions .. and you have more than the means and resources to survive. what makes you think i won't squash you for funsies we spent three months squashing anyone who dared mine gallente ice in highsec, what makes you think that every shitlord who raises a flag isn't going to look like a nail to swing my massive hammer at More fun for you then, so what exactly are you crying about? The fact that the idea is dumb and will be a waste of time? Just because someone benefits from a situation doesn't mean that can't see what's wrong with it. He doesn't benefit from the situation. For all his pathetic "tough guy" act. He's bricking it because his alliance didn't get exactly what they wanted from this sov revamp. Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen.
Lena Lazair Khanid Irregulars Khanid's Legion 340	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:46:35 - [1618] - Quote Kah'Les wrote: And if you want to do this it's nothing stoping you already you can set up POS in any system you want don't need SOV and I know small gangs that shut down systems like this already, The fact that you already not doing it show how much you are comidet to this idea already. It's just a fantasie, if this was your goal you would have already done it. There is an overwhelming perception that it can't be done for newer players because the space LOOKS like it is owned by someone else. Also, you seriously underestimate the importance of having your own name on the map. You CAN live incognito in someone else's **** null, but you don't get to put your name on the map, so why not just go live in a WH instead? I pretty much DO do this, only we do it in a WH. And once the change goes live, we might move to a corner of null instead, who knows? We don't do it now because it doesn't feel like "home" when someone else's name is on the map, but having the convenience of perfect local intel is sure appealing. We already make crap ISK compared to what high sec incursions bring, and that's with the need to fund T3 fleets. Crap null might be even less ISK efficient, but with perfect intel and these sov changes, we would only need to fund intys/AF's and HAC's on that lower income anyway in order to still have fun with anyone passing through. And it doesn't preclude the ability to scan down holes still. Sure, the POS's will be more vulnerable since they can be hotdropped by caps, but the risk of that has become considerably lower with all the other changes. It's not like a POS in a WH is 100% safe either; if someone wants to evict you, they will.
EvilweaselFinance BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation 551	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:46:37 - [1619] - Quote KC Kamikaze wrote: LMAO so i looked you up. Your corp has 16 members. Hope... PRAY... we don't f'king run into you cause i'll SRP our entire fleet out of my own pocket if necessary to make you cry like the little renter *** you are. I just want to point out some basic killboard stats: Buttecorp INC: Destroyed 2.19b Lost: 3.26b Blue-Fire: Destroyed 2.05t Lost 690b By the looks of it if we brought the fight you would get your s_hit pushed in as i would expect of any typical nullbear corp hiding behind a big alliance ticker. https://zkillboard.com/corporation/911536135/ https://zkillboard.com/corporation/98122843/ Your are a small fish in a big pond with *** envy. you do realize what an alt corp is, right frankly i'm surprised we've destroyed 2.19b as i don't know that this altcorp has anyone who can fire a gun right now, though zkillboard seems to be shitting itself so i can't see but go ahead and bark, my capital pilot in goonwaffe has destroyed close to a quarter of what your entire corporation has~~~
Herzog Wolfhammer Sigma Special Tactics Group 6340	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:46:48 - [1620] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: KC Kamikaze wrote: The "Protection" of tomorrow you speak of is todays rental agreement. The new system will be great. Small groups can claim and hold sov. We have multiboxing alt corps holding down wormholes .. now some of those and more can move to holding their own piece of null. The only people who don't win are big coalitions .. and you have more than the means and resources to survive. what makes you think i won't squash you for funsies we spent three months squashing anyone who dared mine gallente ice in highsec, what makes you think that every shitlord who raises a flag isn't going to look like a nail to swing my massive hammer at Well that was hardly difficult was it, all the mining ships of that period had the tank of a wet paper bag, I would like to see you try it now on Skiffs and Procurer fleets, I doubt you will have the same level of success because it is no longer like taking candy from babies... Yes of course you are going to wield that hammer, but the fun part is that smaller entities will go light, TCU next to a deathstar and some even working together to deal with your hammer, it will be fun won't it? They don't want fun. They want ISK. I do agree though that nullsec should have income buffs, but not in the form of more moon goo. It would be epic from a lore point of view if during the Freeport time span lots of different pirate factions start showing up with heavy hitting ships. Not to interfere with the "tug of war", just a raised pirate presence so that the system may even attract freebooters looking for chances at fat loot. This would add an additional entity to these SOV struggles: defenders, invaders, and now all of a sudden all these random neutrals. Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 136 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.