| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
186
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:43:00 -
[3001] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Yeep wrote:Nerf Burger wrote: I never said suicide ganking should be eliminated. Like soundwave, I LOVE that it is possible. I just don't think it should be profitable, easy, and with such a predictable result.
Lets say I fully expand an Iteron V and fill it with Estamel's Invulns. Thats 8369 modules at 18bil a piece, or 150,642,000,000,000ISK of value. Lets assume a gank fit Tornado is the best value for money at 150mil a ship it does roughly 10.5k alpha and in low highsec gets 2 shots off before Concord shows up. To lose isk it would take 1,004,280 Tornados. So an untanked, fully expanded Iteron V should have 21,089,880 EHP. Thats just over half the health of a fully officer tanked titan. But thats ok because ganking isn't supposed to be profitable. oh please, you can fill an expanded Iteron V with GêP titan blueprints so they should have GêP EHP
Ah crap I forgot about blueprints. I guess technically seeing as you can move an infinte number of BPOs in a shuttle we're going to have to just disable pvp in highsec to stop ganking being profitable. |

Pipa Porto
646
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:43:00 -
[3002] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Well that strategy mostly works, if you use a damage control unit If you don't use one, might not be worth getting the extra life from lvl 5 skills. Even then, you might still be gankable, so the entire effort is worthless.
So now the problem is being gankable at all. I see. I thought you were OK with suicide ganks, just not profitable ones. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

baltec1
Bat Country
1838
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:46:00 -
[3003] - Quote
rodyas wrote: Because they are too afraid to be lame. I am not that way, but they are. It is kind of irksome they are that way, but who knows what to do about it.
Or they wanted to balance it right. CCP have improved the barges survivability but not to the point where they are out of reach of ganking. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1650
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:46:00 -
[3004] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:alright,, I guess i have to spell it out for you. Its obviously not supposed to be a viable profession. This has been confirmed by a DEV. Only with recent changes has minger ganking become reliably profitable, an obvious mistake. A dev TOLD YOU and you are still here saying the sky is black. Anyway, I'm done wasting my time arguing with forum dwellers that can't grasp risk/reward, simple concepts and other perspectives. Have fun dedicating your life to posting here, arguing like a radio.
you're bleating risk/reward while saying "suicide ganking should not be profitable"
do i really need to tell you how damned ironic that is?
also, I don't care what the devs say in this regard because no matter how many times they try to convince us (or themselves) that it was "never intended to be profitable," it was EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
33
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:49:00 -
[3005] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Yeep wrote:Nerf Burger wrote: I never said suicide ganking should be eliminated. Like soundwave, I LOVE that it is possible. I just don't think it should be profitable, easy, and with such a predictable result.
Lets say I fully expand an Iteron V and fill it with Estamel's Invulns. Thats 8369 modules at 18bil a piece, or 150,642,000,000,000ISK of value. Lets assume a gank fit Tornado is the best value for money at 150mil a ship it does roughly 10.5k alpha and in low highsec gets 2 shots off before Concord shows up. To lose isk it would take 1,004,280 Tornados. So an untanked, fully expanded Iteron V should have 21,089,880 EHP. Thats just over half the health of a fully officer tanked titan. But thats ok because ganking isn't supposed to be profitable. oh please, you can fill an expanded Iteron V with GêP titan blueprints so they should have GêP EHP
were talking about reliable profitability here and common occurrences. You can't go out daily and find cargholds full of loot like you can find miners in nearly every system in high sec. And why should gankers have all the advantages without any risk.
ugh, why do i do it? |

baltec1
Bat Country
1838
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:51:00 -
[3006] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote: were talking about reliable profitability here and common occurrences. You can't go out daily and find cargholds full of loot like you can find miners in nearly every system in high sec.
ugh, why do i do it?
Clearly you haven't scanned the haulers going in and out of jita. |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
617
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:52:00 -
[3007] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:rodyas wrote:Well that strategy mostly works, if you use a damage control unit If you don't use one, might not be worth getting the extra life from lvl 5 skills. Even then, you might still be gankable, so the entire effort is worthless. So now the problem is being gankable at all. I see. I thought you were OK with suicide ganks, just not profitable ones.
Well good point, a lot of views and gameplay kind of flows back and forth during these discussions, and its hard to always be in one flow.
I don't really support ganking being profitable, unless it npc ganking. Kind of like how missions are or ratting. (But people usually get bored ganking NPCs unless its a main boss or something. Like Sansha herself appearing in an incursion, people might line up to gank her.)
The other flow or gameplay, is how overwhelming the gankers seem to be. It seems like you are surrounded by them, and they will never leave or go away. That gameplay is the one I was talking about in that post. Like has been said here, even if ganking was unprofitable, pilots would still try to gank you. Which ends up leaving you feel, like you are surrounded by them, and they will never leave ya alone. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
186
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:53:00 -
[3008] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote: were talking about reliable profitability here and common occurrences. You can't go out daily and find cargholds full of loot like you can find miners in nearly every system in high sec.
ugh, why do i do it?
Because most of the people who move 500m ISK of stuff do it in a tanked or cloaked hauler, or something fast enough to not get caught.
The miners still persist in leaving their 500m ISK ships untanked.
The problem here is not game mechanics, the problem is miners. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1254
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:54:00 -
[3009] - Quote
Yeep wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:were talking about reliable profitability here and common occurrences. You can't go out daily and find cargholds full of loot like you can find miners in nearly every system in high sec Because most of the people who move 500m ISK of stuff do it in a tanked or cloaked hauler, or something fast enough to not get caught. The miners still persist in leaving their 500m ISK ships untanked. The problem here is not game mechanics, the problem is miners. The solution is more buffs. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Pipa Porto
646
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:54:00 -
[3010] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:were talking about reliable profitability here and common occurrences. You can't go out daily and find cargholds full of loot like you can find miners in nearly every system in high sec.
ugh, why do i do it?
The Profit is only reliable because the Miners make it so. Freighter pilots long ago figured out that they usually can't fill their Freighter to the brim and make it where they want to go, so they adapted and limited the amount of ISK worth of cargo. Their cost for that adaptation is making more runs than they would have otherwise.
Miners could have adapted and made the profitability highly unreliable, and then Gankers complaining about profit wouldn't have a leg to stand on. But that's not what the Miners did. Instead, they went to mama CCP and cried for a buff to the poor, untankable ( ) Hulk.
Now they're whining about crystals and cargo space, because the Hulk's no longer super convenient as well as super tanky and the best yielding ship in the game all at the same time. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1650
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:57:00 -
[3011] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Now they're whining about crystals and cargo space, because the Hulk's no longer super convenient as well as super tanky and the best yielding ship in the game all at the same time.
they're also whining about CCP "kneeling to the gankers" and mostly taking away the hulk's idiot-proof tank
it's like a massive overload in irony EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

Pipa Porto
646
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:58:00 -
[3012] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:rodyas wrote:Well that strategy mostly works, if you use a damage control unit If you don't use one, might not be worth getting the extra life from lvl 5 skills. Even then, you might still be gankable, so the entire effort is worthless. So now the problem is being gankable at all. I see. I thought you were OK with suicide ganks, just not profitable ones. Well good point, a lot of views and gameplay kind of flows back and forth during these discussions, and its hard to always be in one flow. I don't really support ganking being profitable, unless it npc ganking. Kind of like how missions are or ratting. (But people usually get bored ganking NPCs unless its a main boss or something. Like Sansha herself appearing in an incursion, people might line up to gank her.) The other flow or gameplay, is how overwhelming the gankers seem to be. It seems like you are surrounded by them, and they will never leave or go away. That gameplay is the one I was talking about in that post. Like has been said here, even if ganking was unprofitable, pilots would still try to gank you. Which ends up leaving you feel, like you are surrounded by them, and they will never leave ya alone.
Well that's just good PR on the gankers part (and a sensible unwillingness of successful, smart miners to pipe up).
Unprofitable Freighter Ganks are vanishingly rare, unprofitable Hulk ganks are hard to find on the KBs. Try mining in a tanked Hulk. Just because you're afraid the gankers are going to throw their money away on you doesn't mean they actually will. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
646
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:59:00 -
[3013] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Now they're whining about crystals and cargo space, because the Hulk's no longer super convenient as well as super tanky and the best yielding ship in the game all at the same time. they're also whining about CCP "kneeling to the gankers" and mostly taking away the hulk's idiot-proof tank it's like a massive overload in irony
I've even got one attacking me via EVEmail. I still can't figure out what I did to **** him off. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

baltec1
Bat Country
1840
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:59:00 -
[3014] - Quote
rodyas wrote: Well good point, a lot of views and gameplay kind of flows back and forth during these discussions, and its hard to always be in one flow.
I don't really support ganking being profitable, unless it npc ganking. Kind of like how missions are or ratting. (But people usually get bored ganking NPCs unless its a main boss or something. Like Sansha herself appearing in an incursion, people might line up to gank her.)
The other flow or gameplay, is how overwhelming the gankers seem to be. It seems like you are surrounded by them, and they will never leave or go away. That gameplay is the one I was talking about in that post. Like has been said here, even if ganking was unprofitable, pilots would still try to gank you. Which ends up leaving you feel, like you are surrounded by them, and they will never leave ya alone.
The only place where ganking is overwhelming is these forums. In the game itself ganking is a rather rare event outside hulkageddon. |

Hypercake Mix
Magical Rainbow Bakery
7
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:02:00 -
[3015] - Quote
I'm expecting an increase in mining barge/exhumer suicide ganks this month. |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
617
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:03:00 -
[3016] - Quote
I did mine in a tanked mining vessel once. But no one ganked me so everytime I undocked with a tank on I felt stupid. It felt like fitting bubbles on a hic, but you know you are only flying in low sec space.
If you could promise me everytime I undock someone would attempt to gank me, unprofitalbe or profitable I would fit a tank. (and not feel stupid)
but no one can promise that, so fitting a tank is boring and almost pointless.
Of course I was ice mining, I realized there are only a few places to mine ice, so its popular to go there to gank, Easy to find prey or its automatic to have some. So I will either not mine ice, or perhaps fit a tank to mine ice, depending if I feel a tank keeps me safe enough. Otherwise, I will propably bugger off to places harder to find prey, so gankers lose the sense of excitement, and I can mine in my own fashion. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1650
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:04:00 -
[3017] - Quote
rodyas wrote:It felt like fitting bubbles on a hic, but you know you are only flying in low sec space.
let me tell you about the script you fit on that module
as for the rest of your post, I thought ganking was LITERALLY MAKING THE GAME UNPLAYABLE EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
617
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:05:00 -
[3018] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:rodyas wrote: Well good point, a lot of views and gameplay kind of flows back and forth during these discussions, and its hard to always be in one flow.
I don't really support ganking being profitable, unless it npc ganking. Kind of like how missions are or ratting. (But people usually get bored ganking NPCs unless its a main boss or something. Like Sansha herself appearing in an incursion, people might line up to gank her.)
The other flow or gameplay, is how overwhelming the gankers seem to be. It seems like you are surrounded by them, and they will never leave or go away. That gameplay is the one I was talking about in that post. Like has been said here, even if ganking was unprofitable, pilots would still try to gank you. Which ends up leaving you feel, like you are surrounded by them, and they will never leave ya alone.
The only place where ganking is overwhelming is these forums. In the game itself ganking is a rather rare event outside hulkageddon.
Yeah true, I am often left feeling that way, which leads to confusion on what to post about. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
617
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:06:00 -
[3019] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:rodyas wrote:It felt like fitting bubbles on a hic, but you know you are only flying in low sec space. let me tell you about the script you fit on that module as for the rest of your post, I thought ganking was LITERALLY MAKING THE GAME UNPLAYABLE
It was, but you adapt as you said. Of course parts of mining have to shut down during the adaptation stage (much like in movies in where the humanity is lost during the adaptation stage) So its not a complete adaptation, and still seeing if it is worth it or not. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
186
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:07:00 -
[3020] - Quote
rodyas wrote: but no one can promise that, so fitting a tank is boring and almost pointless.
Are you really this dense? You fit a tank so that nobody tries to gank you. Nobody smart is going to see your tank and go for it anyway just to amuse you. |

Pipa Porto
646
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:08:00 -
[3021] - Quote
rodyas wrote:I did mine in a tanked mining vessel once. But no one ganked me so everytime I undocked with a tank on I felt stupid. It felt like fitting bubbles on a hic, but you know you are only flying in low sec space.
If you could promise me everytime I undock someone would attempt to gank me, unprofitalbe or profitable I would fit a tank. (and not feel stupid)
but no one can promise that, so fitting a tank is boring and almost pointless.
Of course I was ice mining, I realized there are only a few places to mine ice, so its popular to go there to gank, Easy to find prey or its automatic to have some. So I will either not mine ice, or perhaps fit a tank to mine ice, depending if I feel a tank keeps me safe enough. Otherwise, I will propably bugger off to places harder to find prey, so gankers lose the sense of excitement, and I can mine in my own fashion.
Let me tell you about the last time I wore my seatbelt.... Let me tell you about the last time I took an Umbrella along... Let me tell you about the last time I wore a Helmet Skiing (actually, that one, I crashed and broke my arm... [:sigh:])...
A Tank is a safety device that has the added benefit of deterring the same unsafe elements it protects you from. Nobody trying to gank you is OP SUCCESS. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1650
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:08:00 -
[3022] - Quote
rodyas wrote:It was, but you adapt as you said.
You can't sit here telling me that miner ganking was making the game unplayable when you're saying that nobody ever bothered you while you mined. EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
452
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:12:00 -
[3023] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:rodyas wrote: Well good point, a lot of views and gameplay kind of flows back and forth during these discussions, and its hard to always be in one flow.
I don't really support ganking being profitable, unless it npc ganking. Kind of like how missions are or ratting. (But people usually get bored ganking NPCs unless its a main boss or something. Like Sansha herself appearing in an incursion, people might line up to gank her.)
The other flow or gameplay, is how overwhelming the gankers seem to be. It seems like you are surrounded by them, and they will never leave or go away. That gameplay is the one I was talking about in that post. Like has been said here, even if ganking was unprofitable, pilots would still try to gank you. Which ends up leaving you feel, like you are surrounded by them, and they will never leave ya alone.
The only place where ganking is overwhelming is these forums. In the game itself ganking is a rather rare event outside hulkageddon. Umm you do realize Goonswarm was paying extra bounties for mining barge and exhumer kills? the whole hulkagedon forever thing.
Probably why its members are complaining about the changes so much, less people will gank miners (at their current payout levels), so less exhumers needed to be manufactured, so less tech needed (They have already said that Alchemy will not be a profitable substitute for tech) so less profit for the tech moon owners.
So in the end it comes down to Mining ship changes bad for tech moon owners business. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

baltec1
Bat Country
1841
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:14:00 -
[3024] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Umm you do realize Goonswarm was paying extra bounties for mining barge and exhumer kills? the whole hulkagedon forever thing.
Its amazing how few people have taken up this offer. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1650
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:17:00 -
[3025] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Umm you do realize Goonswarm was paying extra bounties for mining barge and exhumer kills? the whole hulkagedon forever thing.
Its amazing how few people have taken up this offer.
i paid out like 5b the other day for like 4 days worth of ganks
i also convinced the guy who was handling your perma-mwd megathron reimbursement request to pay it out EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
617
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:18:00 -
[3026] - Quote
I was ganked once, it was alright, killed in low sec as well. So those places are in shutdown, till it doesn't happen in a way.
You will have to tell me about wearing a seatbelt, I havn't worn one for awhile, and I forgot what the feel of a collar feels like. As for an umbrella, it sucked carrying it around. As for no helmet while skiing, that is easy, just don't panic when you hit someone, just grab them in yoru arms, and flex to keep them safe and roll with them, using your body to protect them. That is what I do, helmets are for noobs. Though I was hoping to snowboard amongst the trees, and I was hoping to use a helmet for that, since I would be new at it.
The me being dense part is this. Mining while tanked so no one ganks you, is not a victory condition, you don't win EVE for it, then get flown to iceland for people to celebrate your victory. You have to mine on, and when you mine on with a tank and no one ganks you, it gets boring. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1650
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:19:00 -
[3027] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:So in the end it comes down to Mining ship changes bad for tech moon owners business.
aaaand here comes the tinfoil
you should ask rubyporto how much tech his alliance holds EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

baltec1
Bat Country
1841
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:20:00 -
[3028] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote: i paid out like 5b the other day for like 4 days worth of ganks
i also convinced the guy who was handling your perma-mwd megathron reimbursement request to pay it out
I was only expecting the 2 mil for the cyno
|

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
617
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:21:00 -
[3029] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:baltec1 wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Umm you do realize Goonswarm was paying extra bounties for mining barge and exhumer kills? the whole hulkagedon forever thing.
Its amazing how few people have taken up this offer. i paid out like 5b the other day for like 4 days worth of ganks i also convinced the guy who was handling your perma-mwd megathron reimbursement request to pay it out
You should respect the the plea for the reimbursement for the perma-mwd megathron, it is really hard to run from low sec camps, and he was doing his best.
I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Pipa Porto
646
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 23:22:00 -
[3030] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Umm you do realize Goonswarm was paying extra bounties for mining barge and exhumer kills? the whole hulkagedon forever thing.
Probably why its members are complaining about the changes so much, less people will gank miners (at their current payout levels), so less exhumers needed to be manufactured, so less tech needed (They have already said that Alchemy will not be a profitable substitute for tech) so less profit for the tech moon owners.
So in the end it comes down to Mining ship changes bad for tech moon owners business.
So? Nothing's stopping you from running a counterbounty, paying for people's Hulk losses. Or paying for Goon kills. A Player organization's actions isn't relevant to a discussion of game mechanical balance.
Alchemy doesn't have to be profitable to cut Tech prices down hard (it's already halved Tech Prices just by being announced). It just has to be there, ready to step in to break any price fixing Cartel. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |