Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |
dexington
75
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 10:59:00 -
[271] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:CCP could have done so much with mining, but instead they decided to give us invulnerable bots harvesting ore and ice 24/7.
It's not like they don't exist now, all battleships with 8 high out mine anything that can't fit 3 strip miners. GÇ£The best way to keep something bad from happening is to see it ahead of time, and you can't see it if you refuse to face the possibility.GÇ¥-á |
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1654
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:02:00 -
[272] - Quote
pussnheels wrote:what i find harder to understand why some people only want to ruin other gaming experience by acting like a bunch of white trash teenagers who s like nothing more than to set fire to the neigbours pet rabbit
Because burning down the factories of people who haven't got fire fighting equipment means that your fire-resistant factory is more profitable.
Welcome to extreme capitalism and piracy, in the cold harsh Objectivist world of EVE Online. Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1654
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:04:00 -
[273] - Quote
dexington wrote:It's not like they don't exist now, all battleships with 8 high out mine anything that can't fit 3 strip miners.
You can't harvest ice in a battleship.
Mining asteroids in a battleship would require the bot to target new asteroids constantly and move to new belts when the current belt is exhausted. Then mining in a fleet would require more coordination between the bots to ensure they aren't mining each others' rocks.
I'm sure there's a bot out there that can handle all of the above, but the simplest bots will harvest ice because ice never pops.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |
Pipa Porto
498
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:06:00 -
[274] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Sam Ruger wrote: And Ganker is too stupid to bring some friends along to help.
Fitted Properly, a Hulk cannot be profitably ganked right now. It shouldn't be profitably ganked. Do you profitably gank empty badgers or T2 fitted BCs?
You can profitably gank a number of untanked T2 ships (most T2 Cruisers, for instance). Exhumers are just the most common T2 ship flown without a Tank. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |
Pipa Porto
498
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:13:00 -
[275] - Quote
Jypsie wrote:Here's my problem with his list when it comes to fitting. Which is really what we're arguing about in this thread. The stat changes and fitting changes to barges.
He includes the exhumers using every single slot fitted for tank.
If an exhumer with half slots tank, half slots yield, had a chance against a decent ass dessie fit, we wouldn't be where we are today. But it doesn't, and here we are.
A Hulk with every slot dedicated to Tank will be unprofitable to Gank in any reasonable HS gank (30 noobships is not reasonable).
A Hulk with 1 MLUII can still get over 20k EHP, which will stop any solo gank. Heck, it'll probably stop ganks from being profitable in some higher sec bands. I'm not going to bother doing the math because ::effort:: EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |
baltec1
Bat Country
1706
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:14:00 -
[276] - Quote
pussnheels wrote: not really true over the last 2 months i ve seen a change in miner attitude , away from the max yield hulks , sure there are still plenty out there who still mine stupid and i disagree with the second part of your answer , adapt you need to learn to adapt , somebody will come up with a method to gank them, it will only take more effort , effort keyword , here and no i am not happy how mining actually works , it is long and boring work and very open to abuse by bots but i can understand that some people after a long stressfull day at the office , watching their stripminers chew rocks relieves stress what i find harder to understand why some people only want to ruin other gaming experience by acting like a bunch of white trash teenagers who s like nothing more than to set fire to the neigbours pet rabbit
Its called piracy.
|
Kinis Deren
EVE University Ivy League
64
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:19:00 -
[277] - Quote
I can't understand all the QQ'ing from the ganker dudes
Plenty of Hulks in nullbear land (sov null) and no CONCORD response either Oh wait, is that too risky for you? |
Adam Junior
Protus Correction Facility Inc.
12
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:19:00 -
[278] - Quote
AFK mining makes my warboats cheap. |
Tyrton
Imbecile MIiss Managment and Disasters Intergalactic Interstellar Interns
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:25:00 -
[279] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:MinefieldS wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:Oh he mad. But is he wrong? Nope. Fitted properly, a Hulk cannot be profitably ganked. How about a fleet of 30ish velators w/ cheap blasters? So taking 7.5 man hours to gank a Hulk profitably. Ok
Crap like this amazes me ... ccp is taking away/reducing cheap ganks for lols, thats fantastic. You spend time repeating the same boring 3 points 1 Don't afk mine 2 Tank your barge(instead of yield or cargo) 3 Be aligned and have friends.
AND NOW
You are now whining that it will take effort on your part to gank a barge.....REALLY.
The only thing that will change is this upcoming buff will get rid of the "herp derp i killed your hulk you suck at pvp i am pvp god"
I am sure that serious gankers ... will find a way to kill even a fully tanked skiff (it will all depend on how much they want it) |
baltec1
Bat Country
1707
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:31:00 -
[280] - Quote
Tyrton wrote: AND NOW
You are now whining that it will take effort on your part to gank a barge.....REALLY.
No we are pointing out that exhumers could already tank and that the changes mean thet they can now tank most attempts while having a max yeild fit. Which is wrong. |
|
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
121
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:33:00 -
[281] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Happy Miner is proud that he's too stupid to survive without CCP holding his hand and leading him to water. Bet you that in 6 months we're gonna hear Happy Miner turn into Sad Miner complaining that CCP hasn't forced him to drink.
1) I'm happy miner and yet to be ganked. 2) I do my mining mostly with Hulk. 3) If you want to gank me prepare to lose more destroyers than you thought you would lose. 4) Yes, there's still time before Inferno 1.2! |
Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
264
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:34:00 -
[282] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Tyrton wrote: AND NOW
You are now whining that it will take effort on your part to gank a barge.....REALLY.
No we are pointing out that exhumers could already tank and that the changes mean thet they can now tank most attempts while having a max yeild fit. Which is wrong.
and it's not wrong that a 3m ship can take down a 250m ship in a matter of seconds? i have no issue with a 3m ship taking down a 250m ship, i just have an issue with it happening in seconds. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
baltec1
Bat Country
1707
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:36:00 -
[283] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:baltec1 wrote:Tyrton wrote: AND NOW
You are now whining that it will take effort on your part to gank a barge.....REALLY.
No we are pointing out that exhumers could already tank and that the changes mean thet they can now tank most attempts while having a max yeild fit. Which is wrong. and it's not wrong that a 3m ship can take down a 250m ship in a matter of seconds? i have no issue with a 3m ship taking down a 250m ship, i just have an issue with it happening in seconds.
The same 3 mil ship will take down any heavy assault ship and recon in the same time if they dont tank their ships. |
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
121
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:38:00 -
[284] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:The same 3 mil ship will take down any heavy assault ship and recon in the same time if they dont tank their ships.
I would PAY to see you destroying my Pilgrim with Catalyst. Or Curse. |
baltec1
Bat Country
1707
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:40:00 -
[285] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:baltec1 wrote:The same 3 mil ship will take down any heavy assault ship and recon in the same time if they dont tank their ships. I would PAY to see you destroying my Pilgrim with Catalyst.
Pilgrim hull has less tank than a hulk hull. |
Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
264
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:41:00 -
[286] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Dave stark wrote:baltec1 wrote:Tyrton wrote: AND NOW
You are now whining that it will take effort on your part to gank a barge.....REALLY.
No we are pointing out that exhumers could already tank and that the changes mean thet they can now tank most attempts while having a max yeild fit. Which is wrong. and it's not wrong that a 3m ship can take down a 250m ship in a matter of seconds? i have no issue with a 3m ship taking down a 250m ship, i just have an issue with it happening in seconds. The same 3 mil ship will take down any heavy assault ship and recon in the same time if they dont tank their ships.
that assumes the destroyer doesn't get it's ass handed to it by a ship that can shoot back; miners don't have that option. combat ships don't *have* to fit tanks to win fights, barges do since we have no control over our "guns" (concord).
if you're turning your ship in to a tank it defeats the purpose of the ship to begin with. you may as well be mining in a battleship which ccp obviously think is ******** due to the fact that they then introduced dedicated mining ships. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
121
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:41:00 -
[287] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Pilgrim hull has less tank than a hulk hull.
How long can you keep firing your blasters without cap? |
Mara Tessidar
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
642
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:43:00 -
[288] - Quote
Highsec is not supposed to be safe, it is supposed to be safer. Unfortunately, mining ships are now so overtanked that even an idiot can't lose one short of pressing the self-destruct button and walking away from their computer for two minutes. There are a lot of idiots flying mining ships.
Thanks for the wonderful ship balancing as per your usual standard, CCP. EveO is a circus train that is for bafflingly unclear reasons also carrying tanks of chlorine gas,-ácrashing and exploding in the middle of a small midwestern town. -áCalling it a mere train wreck gives neither the entertainment nor the horror it offers its proper due. |
baltec1
Bat Country
1707
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:44:00 -
[289] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:
that assumes the destroyer doesn't get it's ass handed to it by a ship that can shoot back; miners don't have that option. combat ships don't *have* to fit tanks to win fights, barges do since we have no control over our "guns" (concord).
if you're turning your ship in to a tank it defeats the purpose of the ship to begin with. you may as well be mining in a battleship which ccp obviously think is ******** due to the fact that they then introduced dedicated mining ships.
So fitting a tank means the three t2 strips stop working?
Also, the untanked heavy assault ship would die so fast it wouldnt get the chance to shoot back. I know, we tested this. |
Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
264
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:44:00 -
[290] - Quote
Mara Tessidar wrote:Highsec is not supposed to be safe, it is supposed to be safer. Unfortunately, mining ships are now so overtanked that even an idiot can't lose one short of pressing the self-destruct button and walking away from their computer for two minutes. There are a lot of idiots flying mining ships.
Thanks for the wonderful ship balancing as per your usual standard, CCP.
and you think it was balanced that in order to tank a 0.0 rat spawn you HAD to use deadspace/faction modules? as if a hulk hull on it's own isn't a big enough prize for a neut... Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
|
baltec1
Bat Country
1707
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:45:00 -
[291] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:baltec1 wrote:Pilgrim hull has less tank than a hulk hull. How long can you keep firing your blasters without cap?
2-3 vollies and you die. |
Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
265
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:47:00 -
[292] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Dave stark wrote:
that assumes the destroyer doesn't get it's ass handed to it by a ship that can shoot back; miners don't have that option. combat ships don't *have* to fit tanks to win fights, barges do since we have no control over our "guns" (concord).
if you're turning your ship in to a tank it defeats the purpose of the ship to begin with. you may as well be mining in a battleship which ccp obviously think is ******** due to the fact that they then introduced dedicated mining ships.
So fitting a tank means the three t2 strips stop working? Also, the untanked heavy assault ship would die so fast it wouldnt get the chance to shoot back. I know, we tested this.
no. however the point of it is that you're effectively mining in a battleship, which is not what ccp want as evident by the fact that when that was the only option they introduced ships that were dedicated to mining. however then we come to the issue that i just put in my other post in order to tank rat spawns you need deadspace modules etc
the tank buff was inevitable. have they gone too far with the skiff? yeah probably, however in their current state their tank is just bad. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
baltec1
Bat Country
1708
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:50:00 -
[293] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:
no. however the point of it is that you're effectively mining in a battleship, which is not what ccp want as evident by the fact that when that was the only option they introduced ships that were dedicated to mining. however then we come to the issue that i just put in my other post in order to tank rat spawns you need deadspace modules etc
the tank buff was inevitable. have they gone too far with the skiff? yeah probably, however in their current state their tank is just bad.
You dont need deadspace mods to tank rats in 0.0
Also your self entitlement is shocking. I mean, hoe DARE I say that you should be putting a tank on your ship just like everyone else has to. Hulks should have the best of all worlds just because. |
Mara Tessidar
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
642
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:50:00 -
[294] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:
and you think it was balanced that in order to tank a 0.0 rat spawn you HAD to use deadspace/faction modules? as if a hulk hull on it's own isn't a big enough prize for a neut...
You can easily tank nullsec rats in a Hulk if you don't fit an omnitank. EveO is a circus train that is for bafflingly unclear reasons also carrying tanks of chlorine gas,-ácrashing and exploding in the middle of a small midwestern town. -áCalling it a mere train wreck gives neither the entertainment nor the horror it offers its proper due. |
Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
265
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:52:00 -
[295] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Dave stark wrote:
no. however the point of it is that you're effectively mining in a battleship, which is not what ccp want as evident by the fact that when that was the only option they introduced ships that were dedicated to mining. however then we come to the issue that i just put in my other post in order to tank rat spawns you need deadspace modules etc
the tank buff was inevitable. have they gone too far with the skiff? yeah probably, however in their current state their tank is just bad.
You dont need deadspace mods to tank rats in 0.0 Also your self entitlement is shocking. I mean, hoe DARE I say that you should be putting a tank on your ship just like everyone else has to. Hulks should have the best of all worlds just because.
yeah, you do. you can't be cap stable without a deadspace/faction booster.
self entitlement? how? all i said was it's not what ccp want you to do, and i've stated why it's obvious ccp don't want you to do that. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
baltec1
Bat Country
1708
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:55:00 -
[296] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:
yeah, you do. you can't be cap stable without a deadspace/faction booster.
self entitlement? how? all i said was it's not what ccp want you to do, and i've stated why it's obvious ccp don't want you to do that.
Because CCP have never made a mistake with a ship buff before. Also learn to tank, t2 tanked hulks work just fine in 0.0 |
Doddy
Excidium. Executive Outcomes
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:55:00 -
[297] - Quote
Speaking as someone who has happily ganked scores of hulks there was never really any good reason for them having th survivability of a wet paper bag. Gankers don't expect to solo gank a freighter or a mission bs so they shouldn't really expect to be able to do it to a miner either. The only reservation i really have is the excessive tank on the afk friendly makinaw. To my mind hulk should have the same sort of tank as now but without really nerfing its output (the reduced cargo being a very goo dthing) to get it, the makinaw should have less tank than this not more. Really they should continue this trend into haulers. At the moment (with the notable exception of the itty 5) the highest capacity sub freighter haulers are also the most gank proof (DSTs). |
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1655
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:58:00 -
[298] - Quote
Tyrton wrote:You spend time repeating the same boring 3 points 1 Don't afk mine 2 Tank your barge(instead of yield or cargo) 3 Be aligned and have friends.
AND NOW
You are now whining that it will take effort on your part to gank a barge.....REALLY.
The major part of the whine is that with the barge buff, the miner will no longer have to follow those three steps, since the raw Skiff hull with no tank fitted is already better tanked than a brick-fit Hulk, with better yield than that brick-fit Hulk the moment you fit an MLU/IHU in a low slot (which you will be able to do because you don't have to worry about tank). I have wanted a small buff to Exhumers for some time in the form of a little more PG and perhaps a bit more shield for the hulk. I'd have been elated with a 10PG buff to Hulks, since that would allow for 30k EHP and a mining upgrade in a low slot.
So here we are with an exhumer that can field a 100k EHP tank yet still get 5/6th the yield of a Hulk. For the tank & capacity roles, I'd have expected 1/2 the yield of a Hulk (through a cycle bonus on strip miners and ice harvesters), and I'd have expected the Hulk to receive a slight decrease in EHP to compensate for its extremely high yield.
What is wrong with this situation is that through no effort on the part of the miner, suicide ganking an exhumer is going to be solely the realm of the spite-ganker. It won't even be financially viable to interdict ice harvesting operations in hisec in order to manipulate the price of oxytopes.
It's entirely possible that gankers will "adapt" by switching to other sources of T2 salvage such as marauders. How many marauders are active-tanked gank fits with less than 30k EHP?
Who knows GǪ maybe belt rats will get a serious buff so that a high yield Hulk will be challenged in 0.5 systems?
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |
Y'nit Gidrine
Gold Horizons Industrial
12
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 11:58:00 -
[299] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Dave stark wrote:baltec1 wrote:Tyrton wrote: AND NOW
You are now whining that it will take effort on your part to gank a barge.....REALLY.
No we are pointing out that exhumers could already tank and that the changes mean thet they can now tank most attempts while having a max yeild fit. Which is wrong. and it's not wrong that a 3m ship can take down a 250m ship in a matter of seconds? i have no issue with a 3m ship taking down a 250m ship, i just have an issue with it happening in seconds. The same 3 mil ship will take down any heavy assault ship and recon in the same time if they dont tank their ships.
Your comparison is flawed, the Hulk only has 35 power grid, 4 mid slots and 2 low slots. Hulks have tanks more comparable to frigates than cruisers. Frigates that fly at less than 100m/s and are the size of a battleship. |
Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
265
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:03:00 -
[300] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Dave stark wrote:
yeah, you do. you can't be cap stable without a deadspace/faction booster.
self entitlement? how? all i said was it's not what ccp want you to do, and i've stated why it's obvious ccp don't want you to do that.
Because CCP have never made a mistake with a ship buff before. Also learn to tank, t2 tanked hulks work just fine in 0.0
i already said i think they might have gone overboard with the skiff.
i don't have an issue fitting a tank. again, a t2 small shield booster isn't cap stable. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |