Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country
1711
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:04:00 -
[301] - Quote
Y'nit Gidrine wrote:
Your comparison is flawed, the Hulk only has 35 power grid, 4 mid slots and 2 low slots. Hulks have tanks more comparable to frigates than cruisers. Frigates that fly at less than 100m/s and are the size of a battleship.
A hulk will get a 33k hp buffer. Most heavy assault ships get a buffer of between 30k and 40k. The comparison is valid.
The base tank on these ships is more or less the same with the same resists. |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1169
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:06:00 -
[302] - Quote
So i herd that the risk reward policy that makes EVE what it is doesnt apply to afk miners anymore
c/d My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

Tyrton
Imbecile MIiss Managment and Disasters Intergalactic Interstellar Interns
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:08:00 -
[303] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Tyrton wrote: AND NOW
You are now whining that it will take effort on your part to gank a barge.....REALLY.
No we are pointing out that exhumers could already tank and that the changes mean thet they can now tank most attempts while having a max yeild fit. Which is wrong.
Not sure if its wrong max yield on a skiff does not compare to max yield on a hulk. The miner will have to trade off the number of strips he can have to the amount of tank he can have .
Another point is that the skiff was somewhat of a useless step in barges (unless it was used in deep core mining merx in (0.0)) This change will bring the skiff a new life in the steps leading up to the hulk.
A miner will trade up yield for tank just by simply choosing how much protection he wants ..
If i recall in some other post a fully yield hulk only has 28k ehp .. that is an improvement form the 9k or so it did have with an SB fit (have not eft-ed in a while)
To me the bottom line that no 3 week old alt in a cat getting off 4 rounds to take out a hulk. Those folks that love to gank will work out their new bottom line and keep on trucking ...
PS: Many have mentioned it before you can't tank stupid, even after the changes there will be miners that will be in their hulks with no rigs missing mids and mlu's in the lows. This will make ganking a bit more selective and ship scanners more used.
|

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
265
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:09:00 -
[304] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:So i herd that the risk reward policy that makes EVE what it is doesnt apply to afk miners anymore
c/d
nor suicide gankers. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1705
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:14:00 -
[305] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:You should not get a profit because you slap 2 hardeners to survive a gank, but because you had to solve something more complex than what a turtle could do while asleep in order to get those minerals. Other MMOs do that and they certainly don't have brighter designers than CCP. In which games is mining any more difficult than beating someone else to the rock and then activating your mining skill?
In Entropia you have to survey an area (and fight against aggro off stuff) and then find where the stuff could be close enough and finally deploy explosives (all stuff that gets used or breaks so you have to resupply as well). In the end you take more or less the same time but it's much more of an active game play.
Mara Rinn wrote: I make a profit because I can survive a gank, but also because I practice that activity that all prey animals throughout the evolution of life on Earth have practised in order to survive and propagate the species: be alert. If you're in a group, make sure at least one of you is watching the region around you for danger.
This is more complex than "what a turtle could do while asleep".
The barge buff now means that mining is less complex than the simplest thing a turtle could do while dead. What challenge was left in mining is being taken away.
Did you seriously mine for the challenge?  Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

DrSmegma
Smegma United Asgard Supplies and Logistics
60
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:14:00 -
[306] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Skippermonkey wrote:So i herd that the risk reward policy that makes EVE what it is doesnt apply to afk miners anymore
c/d nor suicide gankers.
Confirming two wrongs make a right I don't really want to troll you. If I trolled you anyway, I'll probably edit it out as soon as the rage fades. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1656
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:15:00 -
[307] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:nor suicide gankers.
Suicide gankers are the risk.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
265
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:17:00 -
[308] - Quote
DrSmegma wrote:Dave stark wrote:Skippermonkey wrote:So i herd that the risk reward policy that makes EVE what it is doesnt apply to afk miners anymore
c/d nor suicide gankers. Confirming two wrongs make a right
well, to be fair, they're mostly the ones complaining about it. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1656
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:17:00 -
[309] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Did you seriously mine for the challenge? 
I mined for profit. There was very little challenge in mining, even your hypothetical sleeping turtle could do it. But all the people with less intellect than a sleeping turtle complained so long and loud that they got what they wished for, so now mining will have a barrier of entry so low that even a dead turtle could do it.
When I speak of challenge, you might want to substitute barrier to entry.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1705
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:18:00 -
[310] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Sam Ruger wrote: And Ganker is too stupid to bring some friends along to help.
Fitted Properly, a Hulk cannot be profitably ganked right now. It shouldn't be profitably ganked. Do you profitably gank empty badgers or T2 fitted BCs? You can profitably gank a number of untanked T2 ships (most T2 Cruisers, for instance). Exhumers are just the most common T2 ship flown without a Tank.
Sure go do it and report back.
Oh wait, those T2 ships don't *need* to choose between black and white "all tank" vs "all gank" but have dozens of intermediate solutions to adapt to any circumstance. And they tend to come with guns. Yes, the guns you don't have the gonads to fight. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1656
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:19:00 -
[311] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:well, to be fair, they're mostly the ones complaining about it.
Half the people complaining about the buff are the people who actually mine as opposed to the people who might mine, if only it wasn't so dangerous.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

DrSmegma
Smegma United Asgard Supplies and Logistics
61
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:19:00 -
[312] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:DrSmegma wrote:Dave stark wrote:Skippermonkey wrote:So i herd that the risk reward policy that makes EVE what it is doesnt apply to afk miners anymore
c/d nor suicide gankers. Confirming two wrongs make a right well, to be fair, they're mostly the ones complaining about it.
Suicide gankers were overpowered because of sloppy game mechanics, such as -10 pods being allowed into high sec.
Miners were unbalanced because they're the scum of the univers who refused to adapt and cried until CCP gave in although the possibilities to defend themselves had been existent all along.
There's nothing "fair" about this change as you say. I don't really want to troll you. If I trolled you anyway, I'll probably edit it out as soon as the rage fades. |

Taranius De Consolville
Galactic Federation of Light
70
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:20:00 -
[313] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:
Hi, i cannot gank mining barges anymore for fun, i cannot ruin peoples day anymore for fun
i am a whiney little *****
fixed it for u |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1170
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:20:00 -
[314] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Skippermonkey wrote:So i herd that the risk reward policy that makes EVE what it is doesnt apply to afk miners anymore
c/d nor suicide gankers. I know you arent the brightest spark, so i'll point it out to you
Suicide gankers are WELL aware of rick vs reward...
the risk is the ship that they WILL lose, the REWARD is the smug satisfaction that in maybe an hour, the miner will notice that he isnt in the belt anymore
These changes make it so that even Dolly the Cloned Sheep will be able to happily mine away without even a thought for the possible dangers that might be out there.
The hilarious thing is that the miners that CCP are trying to protect will probably not even notice the changes to the mining barge lineup for weeks My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

baltec1
Bat Country
1711
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:21:00 -
[315] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Sure go do it and report back.
Oh wait, those T2 ships don't *need* to choose between black and white "all tank" vs "all gank" but have dozens of intermediate solutions to adapt to any circumstance. And they tend to come with guns. Yes, the guns you don't have the gonads to fight.
Hulks can also go part tank/Yeild. |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1170
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:22:00 -
[316] - Quote
DrSmegma wrote:Suicide gankers were overpowered because of sloppy game mechanics, such as -10 pods being allowed into high sec. Do we need to sit you down with a textbook and explain to you how sec status works? My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
265
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:23:00 -
[317] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:Dave stark wrote:Skippermonkey wrote:So i herd that the risk reward policy that makes EVE what it is doesnt apply to afk miners anymore
c/d nor suicide gankers. I know you arent the brightest spark, so i'll point it out to you Suicide gankers are WELL aware of rick vs reward... the risk is the ship that they WILL lose, the REWARD is the smug satisfaction that in maybe an hour, the miner will notice that he isnt in the belt anymore These changes make it so that even Dolly the Cloned Sheep will be able to happily mine away without even a thought for the possible dangers that might be out there. The hilarious thing is that the miners that CCP are trying to protect will probably not even notice the changes to the mining barge lineup for weeks
there isn't any risk, that's the point. you can't have risk vs reward when there's no risk. it isn't a risk if it's a guaranteed ship loss. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

DrSmegma
Smegma United Asgard Supplies and Logistics
61
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:23:00 -
[318] - Quote
The funniest part is that even after this change, we will still see QQ-postings on the forum of miners who got ganked and demand better protection from CCP. I don't really want to troll you. If I trolled you anyway, I'll probably edit it out as soon as the rage fades. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1705
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:28:00 -
[319] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:[quote=Tyrton]You spend time repeating the same boring 3 points
So here we are with an exhumer that can field a 100k EHP tank yet still get 5/6th the yield of a Hulk. For the tank & capacity roles, I'd have expected 1/2 the yield of a Hulk (through a cycle bonus on strip miners and ice harvesters), and I'd have expected the Hulk to receive a slight decrease in EHP to compensate for its extremely high yield.
Nobody would use a ship yielding 1/2 of a peer tier other. Heck, nobody wanted to use a covetor which is way cheaper, 1 tier below yet it mines within 15% off an Hulk.
The scope of the "tiericide" instead is to make all the ship equally flown.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
265
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:30:00 -
[320] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:[quote=Tyrton]You spend time repeating the same boring 3 points
So here we are with an exhumer that can field a 100k EHP tank yet still get 5/6th the yield of a Hulk. For the tank & capacity roles, I'd have expected 1/2 the yield of a Hulk (through a cycle bonus on strip miners and ice harvesters), and I'd have expected the Hulk to receive a slight decrease in EHP to compensate for its extremely high yield.
Nobody would use a ship yielding 1/2 of a peer tier other. Heck, nobody wanted to use a covetor which is way cheaper, 1 tier below yet it mines within 15% off an Hulk. The scope of the "tiericide" instead is to make all the ship equally flown.
actually it's more than that, iirc you can only fit 2x mlu IIs on a covetor with an implant. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
|

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1171
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:33:00 -
[321] - Quote
(disclaimer - i HOPE i got these figures wrong)
from my basic grasp on maths, here are the expected shield resists for an Exhumer 5 Hulk pilot, bearing in mind this is a NON COMBAT SHIP
EM - 51.56% EXPL - 89.38% THERM - 68.75% KIN - 85.94%
Changes that make them nigh on invulnerable and all they can do it moan that theres not enough room in the cargohold for more mining crystals
CCP, please stop pandering to these people My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1705
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:33:00 -
[322] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Did you seriously mine for the challenge?  I mined for profit. There was very little challenge in mining, even your hypothetical sleeping turtle could do it. But all the people with less intellect than a sleeping turtle complained so long and loud that they got what they wished for, so now mining will have a barrier of entry so low that even a dead turtle could do it. When I speak of challenge, you might want to substitute barrier to entry.
Considering it's the first profession suggested to take, both in tutorials, on rookie chat and online websites, it can't be DA ELITE Everest entry barrier. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1705
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:35:00 -
[323] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:[quote=Tyrton]You spend time repeating the same boring 3 points
So here we are with an exhumer that can field a 100k EHP tank yet still get 5/6th the yield of a Hulk. For the tank & capacity roles, I'd have expected 1/2 the yield of a Hulk (through a cycle bonus on strip miners and ice harvesters), and I'd have expected the Hulk to receive a slight decrease in EHP to compensate for its extremely high yield.
Nobody would use a ship yielding 1/2 of a peer tier other. Heck, nobody wanted to use a covetor which is way cheaper, 1 tier below yet it mines within 15% off an Hulk. The scope of the "tiericide" instead is to make all the ship equally flown. actually it's more than that, iirc you can only fit 2x mlu IIs on a covetor with an implant.
You can only fit those fabled "everybody should get" 30K EHP tanks with CPU implant, EFT "All skills to V" pilot and possibly an Orca boost. Clearly the starter fitting for the starter profession. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
265
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:39:00 -
[324] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Dave stark wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:[quote=Tyrton]You spend time repeating the same boring 3 points
So here we are with an exhumer that can field a 100k EHP tank yet still get 5/6th the yield of a Hulk. For the tank & capacity roles, I'd have expected 1/2 the yield of a Hulk (through a cycle bonus on strip miners and ice harvesters), and I'd have expected the Hulk to receive a slight decrease in EHP to compensate for its extremely high yield.
Nobody would use a ship yielding 1/2 of a peer tier other. Heck, nobody wanted to use a covetor which is way cheaper, 1 tier below yet it mines within 15% off an Hulk. The scope of the "tiericide" instead is to make all the ship equally flown. actually it's more than that, iirc you can only fit 2x mlu IIs on a covetor with an implant. You can only fit those fabled "everybody should get" 32K EHP tanks with CPU implant, EFT "All skills to V" pilot and possibly an Orca boost. Clearly the starter fitting for the starter profession.
yeah but the fact you can't fit the 2nd mlu means the difference between the two ships is greater than 15%. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

baltec1
Bat Country
1711
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:45:00 -
[325] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
You can only fit those fabled "everybody should get" 32K EHP tanks with CPU implant, EFT "All skills to V" pilot and possibly an Orca boost. Clearly the starter fitting for the starter profession.
Because hulks are a starter ship... |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1705
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:49:00 -
[326] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Nobody would use a ship yielding 1/2 of a peer tier other. Heck, nobody wanted to use a covetor which is way cheaper, 1 tier below yet it mines within 15% off an Hulk.
The scope of the "tiericide" instead is to make all the ship equally flown.
You can only fit those fabled "everybody should get" 32K EHP tanks with CPU implant, EFT "All skills to V" pilot and possibly an Orca boost. Clearly the starter fitting for the starter profession.
yeah but the fact you can't fit the 2nd mlu means the difference between the two ships is greater than 15%.[/quote]
It's 20.3%, which is a far, far call from Mara Rinn's "1/2" of peer tier ship. But most "sane" Hulk setups don't have 2 MLUs so the difference is far less. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1705
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:50:00 -
[327] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
You can only fit those fabled "everybody should get" 32K EHP tanks with CPU implant, EFT "All skills to V" pilot and possibly an Orca boost. Clearly the starter fitting for the starter profession.
Because hulks are a starter ship...
A 57 days pre-requisites training ship at the end of the starter profession is nothing compared to tons of other ships in EvE. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1657
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:53:00 -
[328] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A 57 days pre-requisites training ship at the end of the starter profession is nothing compared to tons of other ships in EvE.
Such as Assault Ships, Covert Ops, or Electronic Attack Ships, for example?
Are you suggesting that Ishkurs and Kitsunes are starter ships?
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1705
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:56:00 -
[329] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A 57 days pre-requisites training ship at the end of the starter profession is nothing compared to tons of other ships in EvE. Such as Assault Ships, Covert Ops, or Electronic Attack Ships, for example? Are you suggesting that Ishkurs and Kitsunes are starter ships?
Are you suggesting you can't read starter *profession* and you want to read starter *ship*?
Quite sure in the rookie chat you don't get told to train Electronic Attack Ship ASAP and go use it around. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1657
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 12:58:00 -
[330] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:GǪ now mining will have a barrier of entry so low that even a dead turtle could do it.
When I speak of challenge, you might want to substitute barrier to entry.
Considering it's the first profession suggested to take, both in tutorials, on rookie chat and online websites, it can't be DA ELITE Everest entry barrier.
Yes, and your point is GǪ ?
The barrier for entry into mining was very low, and it is becoming lower with this barge buff. No longer do people even have to use their brain to come up with ways of not getting blown up when mining. Just fly that brand new hull with nothing more than an ice harvester ii fitted, and no-one in their right mind will interfere with you. Then you make some ISK to cover the cost of the ship and you end up fitting an ice harvester upgrade.
No thinking required. No barrier to entry. Mining is the window-licking profession.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |