Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |

Khanh'rhh
1643
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:01:00 -
[331] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Did you seriously mine for the challenge?  I mined for profit. There was very little challenge in mining, even your hypothetical sleeping turtle could do it. But all the people with less intellect than a sleeping turtle complained so long and loud that they got what they wished for, so now mining will have a barrier of entry so low that even a dead turtle could do it. When I speak of challenge, you might want to substitute barrier to entry. Exactly this is the problem.
No matter what a miner does, they have to accept they're playing a gamestyle where a 5 year old taught what 2 buttons to push or an autohotkey script captured in 5minutes would be as safe and efficient as they are.
The skill cap on mining if these changes go through is quite literally nothing; the best players will be no more skilled than those who are fresh out of the tutorials.
There needs to be a mechanic by which players like Mara will have an advantage over players who think going AFK for most of their gameplay time is an equally valid mechanic.
The profession needs a complete overhaul, from the bottom right up, ASAP. It needs:
- Very low yields/rewards for a solo or AFK player. - Highest yields/rewards for an active GROUP of players.
5 players working together to mine should be earning nearly 2x the ore per minute each of 1 player working alone, and that process needs to be highly interactive. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1657
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:02:00 -
[332] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Are you suggesting you can't read starter *profession* and you want to read starter *ship*?
Are you suggesting that recommending mining as a starter profession involves getting people into Hulks ASAP?
As a starter profession, my usual recommendation is to get into a Scythe or Osprey. Training Minmatar or Caldari Cruiser 5 opens up a wonderful world of combat ships that are fun to fly and actually useful in battle. Even for people planning to do only mining, my recommendation is to get into an Osprey rather than a retriever (though this advice will be changing drastically come August 8).
The Hulk is the ultimate mining ship: it is the end-game ship, not the starter ship. Flying it properly requires many skills trained to 5. Just because someone can get into one in 55 days of focussed training doesn't mean they can use it properly.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Cryten Jones
Advantage Inc The Matari Consortium
77
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:04:00 -
[333] - Quote
It's not fun when some random people get to force you into playing a particular way is it.... oh wait that's normally you guys...
Karma.
|

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
265
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:04:00 -
[334] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Dave stark wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Nobody would use a ship yielding 1/2 of a peer tier other. Heck, nobody wanted to use a covetor which is way cheaper, 1 tier below yet it mines within 15% off an Hulk.
The scope of the "tiericide" instead is to make all the ship equally flown.
You can only fit those fabled "everybody should get" 32K EHP tanks with CPU implant, EFT "All skills to V" pilot and possibly an Orca boost. Clearly the starter fitting for the starter profession. yeah but the fact you can't fit the 2nd mlu means the difference between the two ships is greater than 15%. It's 20.3% off a T1 ship vs a T2 ship, which is a far, far call from Mara Rinn's "1/2" of peer tier ship. But most "sane" Hulk setups don't have 2 MLUs so the difference is far less.
depends how we're defining sane. for solo mining, sure. however if you're solo mining you can't tank a covetor so you're a guarenteed free kill.
in a fleet though, why wouldn't you fit 2x mlus? Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

dexington
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:04:00 -
[335] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:No longer do people even have to use their brain to come up with ways of not getting blown up when mining.
As it should be in hi-sec, it's only fair that the aggressor has to be the one using brains. Destroyers taking on +200M T2 ships in high, sec pretty much risk free, is not how it should be. GÇ£The best way to keep something bad from happening is to see it ahead of time, and you can't see it if you refuse to face the possibility.GÇ¥-á |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1174
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:06:00 -
[336] - Quote
The real tragedy here is that instead of CCP reimagining Mining as a Profession, they have instead given the tools to miners to make it much easier to mine for longer periods without any needed input or concentration.
Further relegating mining as the profession of botters and alt accounts My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1705
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:06:00 -
[337] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:GǪ now mining will have a barrier of entry so low that even a dead turtle could do it.
When I speak of challenge, you might want to substitute barrier to entry.
Considering it's the first profession suggested to take, both in tutorials, on rookie chat and online websites, it can't be DA ELITE Everest entry barrier. Yes, and your point is GǪ ? The barrier for entry into mining was very low, and it is becoming lower with this barge buff. No longer do people even have to use their brain to come up with ways of not getting blown up when mining. Just fly that brand new hull with nothing more than an ice harvester ii fitted, and no-one in their right mind will interfere with you. Then you make some ISK to cover the cost of the ship and you end up fitting an ice harvester upgrade. No thinking required. No barrier to entry. Mining is the window-licking profession.
That was engineered to be such a profession and it will stay so until they implement skill requiring game play. No, staying aligned or spamming the 1 directional button or copying Ruby Porto's premade fittings is not "skill requiring game play".
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
265
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:08:00 -
[338] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:The real tragedy here is that instead of CCP reimagining Mining as a Profession, they have instead given the tools to miners to make it much easier to mine for longer periods without any needed input or concentration.
Further relegating mining as the profession of botters and alt accounts
yeah because making the hulk's ore bay facilitates being afk more... right? if you sit at the computer and jetcan mine with a hulk you'll mine more than just waiting for the asteroid depleted sound when sitting there in a mackinaw. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1705
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:09:00 -
[339] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Dave stark wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Nobody would use a ship yielding 1/2 of a peer tier other. Heck, nobody wanted to use a covetor which is way cheaper, 1 tier below yet it mines within 15% off an Hulk.
The scope of the "tiericide" instead is to make all the ship equally flown.
You can only fit those fabled "everybody should get" 32K EHP tanks with CPU implant, EFT "All skills to V" pilot and possibly an Orca boost. Clearly the starter fitting for the starter profession. yeah but the fact you can't fit the 2nd mlu means the difference between the two ships is greater than 15%. It's 20.3% off a T1 ship vs a T2 ship, which is a far, far call from Mara Rinn's "1/2" of peer tier ship. But most "sane" Hulk setups don't have 2 MLUs so the difference is far less. depends how we're defining sane. for solo mining, sure. however if you're solo mining you can't tank a covetor so you're a guarenteed free kill. in a fleet though, why wouldn't you fit 2x mlus?
Because I have an extensive experience of "real world" mining fleets and how pear shaped it goes when a cloakie bails a destroyer on a dual MLU exhumer. No, some ECM drones or sacrificing a remote SEBO ship to gank the ganker won't make it in time.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1705
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:13:00 -
[340] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Are you suggesting you can't read starter *profession* and you want to read starter *ship*? Are you suggesting that recommending mining as a starter profession involves getting people into Hulks ASAP? As a starter profession, my usual recommendation is to get into a Scythe or Osprey. Training Minmatar or Caldari Cruiser 5 opens up a wonderful world of combat ships that are fun to fly and actually useful in battle. Even for people planning to do only mining, my recommendation is to get into an Osprey rather than a retriever (though this advice will be changing drastically come August 8). The Hulk is the ultimate mining ship: it is the end-game ship, not the starter ship. Flying it properly requires many skills trained to 5. Just because someone can get into one in 55 days of focussed training doesn't mean they can use it properly.
I wrote above it's the last ship of the starter profession so it's not like you are writing something so much different than me.
And anyway, regardless of what me or you want, people WILL rush to a Covetor which as you well know is like 2-3 days away from flying an Hulk. Had the covetor => Hulk time jump been like for other ships (Battlecruisers V...) that would make Hulk some totally distant objective, but alas it does not work like that. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|

Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
435
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:15:00 -
[341] - Quote
Amazing to learn that the entire fate of Eve rests on one's ability to shoot unarmed miners in high sec. Brilliant post by OP. Starting off by insulting the intelligence of everybody with a different point of view is a sure winner in any debate. |

Desert Ice78
Cobra Kai Dojo WHY so Seri0Us
144
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:25:00 -
[342] - Quote
Good laugh, would read again.
I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg
CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused. |

Makari Aeron
The Shadow's Of Eve TSOE Consortium
26
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:29:00 -
[343] - Quote
While entertaining, I could care less about hi-sec. I go to hi-sec every six months to pick up skill books and then I'm gone. If you really want to kill miners, do it in 0.0......the fittings are much more expensive down there. Not to mention the abundance of Orcas and Rorquals. And you might get to tangle with REAL ships that fight back for a change. Pew Pew Pew! |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1174
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:32:00 -
[344] - Quote
Makari Aeron wrote:While entertaining, I could care less about hi-sec. I go to hi-sec every six months to pick up skill books and then I'm gone. If you really want to kill miners, do it in 0.0......the fittings are much more expensive down there. Not to mention the abundance of Orcas and Rorquals. And you might get to tangle REAL ships that fight back for a change. blah blah blah come to nulsec
Anyone else tired of hearing that stupid argument? My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

Makari Aeron
The Shadow's Of Eve TSOE Consortium
26
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:35:00 -
[345] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:Makari Aeron wrote:While entertaining, I could care less about hi-sec. I go to hi-sec every six months to pick up skill books and then I'm gone. If you really want to kill miners, do it in 0.0......the fittings are much more expensive down there. Not to mention the abundance of Orcas and Rorquals. And you might get to tangle REAL ships that fight back for a change. blah blah blah come to nulsec Anyone else tired of hearing that stupid argument?
Nope :D Pew Pew Pew! |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
885
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:37:00 -
[346] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:Well played, CCP. Your DEVs/balancing team apparently have the reasoning ability of small children so I'll put this in terms they will understand. ********** "Once upon a time there were three little miners. They ventured into the big wide world to earn their fortunes. The First Little Miner went to Jita and fit his Hulk with Cargo Expanders.This way, he could AFK mine with a minimum of effort and fuss. It left the miner plenty of freetime to daydream, jerk off, and watch Japanese Anime while earning ISK. ....Then along came the Big Bad Ganker in a Catalyst, saying "Little miner, little miner, I'm going to ******* do you in." The first miner, predictably, was tabbed out and said nothing. So the Ganker loaded and overheated and blew the Hulk in, and splattered the pod, too. The Second Little Miner went to Jita, bought MLU's and a hauler.This way, he could mine faster than anyone else - and become quite wealthy in no time. It was a bit more work, of course, but he kept himself entertained chatting in local with his neighbors. ...Then along came the Big Bad Ganker, in a Tornado, saying "Little miner, little miner, I'm going to ******* do you in." The second miner, said "Not by the hair of my chinny, chin chin," aligns, and turned on his Small Booster II. So the Ganker loaded and overheated and blew the Hulk in. The frightened miner flees in his pod, broke, but alive. The Third Little Miner went to Jita and fit his Hulk with a DCII, MSE, Invulnerability Fields, and Shield Extender Rigs. Wisely, he sets his Hulk to orbit a nearby asteroid, and always kept an wary eye on his surroundings. ...Then along came the Big Bad Ganker, in a T2 Talos, saying "Little miner, little miner, I'm going to ******* do you in." The Third miner chuckles to himself, overheats his Invulnerability Fields and aligns to the nearest station. So the Ganker loaded, and overheated, and simply CANNOT blow the Hulk in.Defeated, the ganker slinks off in his pod, and the smart little Miner scoops the Talos wreckage and sells it for a tidy profit." THE END********** Cargo Hulk, Yield Hulk, Tank Hulk, those were the choices - all with drawbacks. Cargo - for a Hybrid Exhumer/Hauler, with a risky AFK 'cruise control' option. Yield - to maximize returns with friends providing transport. Tank - 30-40K EHP to discourage/thwart gankers. (and really, one could still put up a reasonable tank on either Cargo or Yield fit Hulks, if they used the mid-slots....  ) But choices are dangerous things. Given the choice, miners will take cargo/yield every time - and then throw a tantrum when they are ganked. The rare, clever miner who tanked his Hulk; well, he weathered the storm - and reaped the benefits as mineral prices rose. But throw that out the window, just give the whining miners all three. Notice how CCP put quite a bit of care into saving miners from their own bad choices. This is more than a buff - this is CCP acknowledging that miners, as a group, are too stupid to make the correct fitting choices.Step 1: Idiot miners don't even use the slots they have - so slap stupid amounts of EHP directly to the hull, rather than give them additional slots/PG or CPU. Frigate-size Skiff, Orca EHP. Really? Step 2: Idiot miners keep sacking their EHP with Cargo Expanders - so make Cargo Expanders pointless with the Ore Bay. (And I doubt the DEVs will get around to fixing the 'special cargo bays don't drop loot' bug, either - simply because fixing THAT bug would benefit the wrong kinds of players, I suppose.....) So, good game, CCP. Good to know we are still steaming, full speed ahead! - towards Hello-Kitty highsec, a paradise for bots and stupidass gameplay. Hard to hear myself say it, but I'm now officially nostalgic for the days of Incarna and WiS development. At least back then, the DEVs were merely wasting their own time. 
You have such a terrible awful non-respect for the game of EVE. WHY in God's name are you still playing. ? I honestly feel really sorry for your pathetic self. "Every other expansion has catered to the pew-pew need for more things to blow up; to more public cries of, "see how valuable I am!" - anon-á "You have to understand that the human ego will do whatever it takes to get attention because it needs to know that it exists." -- RuPaul |

Sarcasim
The Southern Gentleman's Social Club Event Horizon Protocol
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:40:00 -
[347] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Abdiel Kavash wrote:CCP Soundwave wrote:Suicide ganking wasn't designed to be profitable And I'm already laughing at the hordes of carebears who will quote you out of context for the next year at least. CCP Soundwave wrote:Suicide ganking wasn't designed to be profitable Ah finally a dev, with the carebear at heart. Can you put that on the soundwave soundboard, so I can listen to that, while going to bed. Yeah out of context as well. Like how predictable money making from suicide ganks is the same thing as hunting a place and studying the prey for a random occurence to make billions. Totally the same. Out of context, its so fun
Funny how it came right out of the devs head to his hands to the keyboard and people still dont want to belive what they read. Ask him to type it again see if it changes? |

Unit757
North Point Cannabis Legionis
12
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:42:00 -
[348] - Quote
Currently, on SISI, a completely untanked hulk has 12k EHP. Considering the vast majority will more then likely still fit max yield/no tank, I would say they will still be gankable. I'm not a professional ganker though, so I don't know.
Edit - Sorry, I had low-grade slaves plugged in when I got that number, so it would actually less EHP. |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1174
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:46:00 -
[349] - Quote
Unit757 wrote:Currently, on SISI, a completely untanked hulk has 12k EHP. Considering the vast majority will more then likely still fit max yield/no tank, I would say they will still be gankable. I'm not a professional ganker though, so I don't know.
Edit - Sorry, I had low-grade slaves plugged in when I got that number, so it would actually less EHP.
I didnt think the changes had made their way to SiSI yet
Check to see if the other exhumers have bonuses for Ice and Mercoxit, etc My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
266
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:48:00 -
[350] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:Unit757 wrote:Currently, on SISI, a completely untanked hulk has 12k EHP. Considering the vast majority will more then likely still fit max yield/no tank, I would say they will still be gankable. I'm not a professional ganker though, so I don't know.
Edit - Sorry, I had low-grade slaves plugged in when I got that number, so it would actually less EHP. I didnt think the changes had made their way to SiSI yet Check to see if the other exhumers have bonuses for Ice and Mercoxit, etc
they've been on sisi for a few days now.
and it's mackinaw ehp you need to check, not hulk ehp. :) Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
|

dexington
78
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:48:00 -
[351] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:Unit757 wrote:Currently, on SISI, a completely untanked hulk has 12k EHP. Considering the vast majority will more then likely still fit max yield/no tank, I would say they will still be gankable. I'm not a professional ganker though, so I don't know.
Edit - Sorry, I had low-grade slaves plugged in when I got that number, so it would actually less EHP. I didnt think the changes had made their way to SiSI yet Check to see if the other exhumers have bonuses for Ice and Mercoxit, etc
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=136222&find=unread GÇ£The best way to keep something bad from happening is to see it ahead of time, and you can't see it if you refuse to face the possibility.GÇ¥-á |

Unit757
North Point Cannabis Legionis
12
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:50:00 -
[352] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:Unit757 wrote:Currently, on SISI, a completely untanked hulk has 12k EHP. Considering the vast majority will more then likely still fit max yield/no tank, I would say they will still be gankable. I'm not a professional ganker though, so I don't know.
Edit - Sorry, I had low-grade slaves plugged in when I got that number, so it would actually less EHP. I didnt think the changes had made their way to SiSI yet Check to see if the other exhumers have bonuses for Ice and Mercoxit, etc
They are on the second round of adjustments to the barges now actually. The only real tough ship is the skiff if somebody fits it for a tank, if they are max yield fit, your lucky to break 20k EHP. |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1174
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:50:00 -
[353] - Quote
strange... i thought the stats were the only thing released, as i had my corpmate check the ships on SiSi only a few days ago. My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

Sarcasim
The Southern Gentleman's Social Club Event Horizon Protocol
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 14:00:00 -
[354] - Quote
Being new to the game I can stand on the outside and look in, and see this thread for what it truly is. I have not started mining yet so I am impartial. The DEV said suicide ganking wasnGÇÖt designed as a way to make profit. Seems straight forward to me, doesnGÇÖt take a four year degree to decipher.
When I look at this thread I see a bunch of people butt hurt over possibly loosing that ability. DoesnGÇÖt look like the GÇ£care bearsGÇ¥ are the ones crying. Some of you need to take some of your own advise that you like to throw out there for players. L2P, adapt change or rage quit. Can I have your stuff? You mad bro?
This MMO community is no different than any other. Always the vocal forum warriors cry and complain till they make so many bad changes they ruin the game completely. I hope the development team has the courage and resolve to stay the course and keep designing the game the way they envision it should be.
People will continue to take advantage of game mechanics but they shouldnGÇÖt cry foul when it gets taken away.
|

Danfen Fenix
143
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 14:03:00 -
[355] - Quote
Wait, the dev blog about this has been up for weeks...
Why has the complaining only started now ?  |

Pipa Porto
501
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 14:05:00 -
[356] - Quote
Sarcasim wrote:Being new to the game I can stand on the outside and look in, and see this thread for what it truly is. I have not started mining yet so I am impartial. The DEV said suicide ganking wasnGÇÖt designed as a way to make profit. Seems straight forward to me, doesnGÇÖt take a four year degree to decipher.
EVE's all about emergent gameplay.
There are tons of gameplay elements that we take for granted that weren't envisioned when the mechanics that make them possible were put in place.
Local is one of the biggest ones. CCP never designed Local to be an intel tool, but there you have it. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1179
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 14:06:00 -
[357] - Quote
Danfen Fenix wrote:Wait, the dev blog about this has been up for weeks... Why has the complaining only started now ?  Because of Herr Wilkus
he is great at startign threads like this :3 My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

Pipa Porto
501
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 14:06:00 -
[358] - Quote
Danfen Fenix wrote:Wait, the dev blog about this has been up for weeks... Why has the complaining only started now ? 
The numbers hit SISI, so we've been shown that all of the Exhumers are getting a massive, free, tank buff. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
886
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 14:10:00 -
[359] - Quote
YAWNS politely. "DammitGǪDonGÇÖt you dare ask God to help me."-áSaid by: Joan Crawford to her housekeeper who began to pray aloud on her deathbed. " I love you too, honey. Good luck with your show." Desi Arnaz-á |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1179
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 14:12:00 -
[360] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:YAWNS politely. NERF RED JACKETS! My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |