| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 .. 119 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
601
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 11:39:00 -
[2671] - Quote
^ You should take his tractor as well as his big screen tv.
You make it sound like they are more like hackers then common criminals as well. Which is true, hackers like money, and anyone who has it they will hack. So that guy living far from police will be helpless to a hack. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
601
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 11:40:00 -
[2672] - Quote
Cede Forster wrote:rodyas wrote:^ How would he get robbed though? Black people don't live or travel to the outskirts of a town. Mostly likely it might be someone he knows or trusts. Suppose the only foolish thing he did, was grow close to people.
EDIT: or drink coffee wow, the bottom line, now featuring a cellar
The bottom line is that black unemployment is a lot lower, then your unemployment. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Cede Forster
EVE University Ivy League
11
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 11:42:00 -
[2673] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Cede Forster wrote:rodyas wrote:^ How would he get robbed though? Black people don't live or travel to the outskirts of a town. Mostly likely it might be someone he knows or trusts. Suppose the only foolish thing he did, was grow close to people.
EDIT: or drink coffee wow, the bottom line, now featuring a cellar The bottom line is that black unemployment is a lot lower, then your unemployment.
yes, that must be it  |

Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
270
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 12:09:00 -
[2674] - Quote
You PIGS missed the point.
Bacon. |

Yokai Mitsuhide
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 13:11:00 -
[2675] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Dave stark wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote:A properly fit Tornado delivers a volley of at least 9000 damage, which was far enough to destroy an untanked Hulk before it could react. What's the problem? that bit, i'd imagine. that's how alpha works, hope this helps
Does indeed help. I had heard Goonswarm whined a lot, you helped confirm it for me. Thank you for putting the rumors to rest. |

Yokai Mitsuhide
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 13:13:00 -
[2676] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:You named the things I would have named. They don't have to be something totally different than the 3 exhumers. Just slightly different styles of ships. Faster ships, super long range ships, doesn't matter...give them different looks, sizes, and slight changes from the pre existing exhumers and you at least give more variety and choices of ships to choose from. This could really apply to all categories of ships, I can't see more variety in the ways mentioned above being a bad thing. The universe is huge, I just think seeing the same handful of ships doing everything gets a little old. Except for the combat implications, I wouldn't care if all mining barges had unlimited lock ranges and could motor around at 100km/s. The reason there aren't variety is that 99% of miners will either pick a Tanky Mining ship, a Convenient Mining ship, or a high Yield Mining ship because there's no rational reason to care about any other stat. There's no reason to bother spending a huge amount of Dev and Art team time on ships that nobody's going to use. The bad thing is that variety takes an enormous amount of Dev and Art Dept time. If you want something other than the 6 mining barges, you've got plenty of choices. You can mine in any ship that can fit drones or has a turret slot. Since you don't care about Yield, they'll all work great and that gives you an enormous amount of variety.
But I like strip miners :( so choices are rather limited. |

Sarik Olecar
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
29
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 14:29:00 -
[2677] - Quote
rodyas wrote:^ How would he get robbed though? Black people don't live or travel to the outskirts of a town.
Is this 'Ground Floor'???
 |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
350
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 14:49:00 -
[2678] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Dave stark wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Dave stark wrote:perhaps not so valid when we're talking about nados but i'm almost sure a destroyer can land on grid and bump a miner before they're aligned? Let me tell you about Orca bonuses and being aligned (i.e. moving) implying you must be in a fleet or you deserve to be ganked? orca bonuses give you extra strip miner range please don't put words in my mouth
i didn't put words in your mouth, you're saying you've got to be in a fleet, a very specific fleet, with an orca. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
|

ISD TYPE40
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
57

|
Posted - 2012.08.02 15:13:00 -
[2679] - Quote
This thread has been cleaned numerous times, trolling posts removed and off topic rubbish trimmed. I have asked nicely for people to post responsibly but sadly this has not happened. Therefore I am going to lock it as it seems destined to only slip further down the drain.
Thread locked for repeated trolling, personal attacks and off topic posting - ISD Type40. ISD Type40 Ensign Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|

ISD TYPE40
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
58

|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:23:00 -
[2680] - Quote
Putting the thread back to the front page - ISD Type40. ISD Type40 Ensign Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Pipa Porto
612
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:25:00 -
[2681] - Quote
ISD TYPE40 wrote:Thank you for your patience - ISD Type40.
Thanks very much for your patience in cleaning and scrubbing the thread repeatedly. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
612
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:27:00 -
[2682] - Quote
Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:You named the things I would have named. They don't have to be something totally different than the 3 exhumers. Just slightly different styles of ships. Faster ships, super long range ships, doesn't matter...give them different looks, sizes, and slight changes from the pre existing exhumers and you at least give more variety and choices of ships to choose from. This could really apply to all categories of ships, I can't see more variety in the ways mentioned above being a bad thing. The universe is huge, I just think seeing the same handful of ships doing everything gets a little old. Except for the combat implications, I wouldn't care if all mining barges had unlimited lock ranges and could motor around at 100km/s. The reason there aren't variety is that 99% of miners will either pick a Tanky Mining ship, a Convenient Mining ship, or a high Yield Mining ship because there's no rational reason to care about any other stat. There's no reason to bother spending a huge amount of Dev and Art team time on ships that nobody's going to use. The bad thing is that variety takes an enormous amount of Dev and Art Dept time. If you want something other than the 6 mining barges, you've got plenty of choices. You can mine in any ship that can fit drones or has a turret slot. Since you don't care about Yield, they'll all work great and that gives you an enormous amount of variety. But I like strip miners :( so choices are rather limited.
I thought you didn't care about Yield, and the only significant difference between strip miners and Mining lasers is yield.
So yes, if you limit yourself to high yield ships, your choices are limited, because there are so few variables affecting the usefulness of a mining ship besides Yield, Cargo, and Tank (actually, there are no variables affecting the usefulness of a mining ship besides those three things). EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|

ISD TYPE40
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
58

|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:28:00 -
[2683] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:ISD TYPE40 wrote:Thank you for your patience - ISD Type40. Thanks very much for your patience in cleaning and scrubbing the thread repeatedly.
You are most welcome. Happy posting. ISD Type40 Ensign Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Pipa Porto
612
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:32:00 -
[2684] - Quote
Jagoff Haverford wrote: 2. Shouldn't Hulk be given 3 times more space for crystals than the Skiff, since it has 3 times more strip miners? Or at least twice as much?
The Skiff's designed to be somewhat self sufficient. The Hulk is designed to rely on other ships to allow it to focus solely on mining yield.
Compare RL mining equipment. The biggest equipment, capable of shoveling vast amount of Ore can't actually do anything under their own power. They have to be hooked up to an electrical grid, they need a fleet of Dump trucks to keep up with their output, they need constant maintenance, they have to be disassembled to move any sort of distance, they're generally an incredible pain to set up, but they compensate by moving more earth than any other machine.
Smaller equipment is much less reliant on other equipment, but doesn't move as much earth. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Arec Bardwin
Perkone Caldari State
696
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:35:00 -
[2685] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:ISD TYPE40 wrote:Thank you for your patience - ISD Type40. Thanks very much for your patience in cleaning and scrubbing the thread repeatedly. Too bad all the tears, snot and phlegm from the gankers, really made the thread come alive  |

Hypercake Mix
Magical Rainbow Bakery
7
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:36:00 -
[2686] - Quote
I think they need to bring the tank of the Exhumers up a few more notches. We still don't know what the Destroyer rebalancing and beyond will bring. |

Jim Era
The Syndicate Inc En Garde
56
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:37:00 -
[2687] - Quote
Buff exhumers more imo. Its not enough. |

Anvil44
Independent Traders and Builders MPA
107
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:38:00 -
[2688] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Jagoff Haverford wrote: 2. Shouldn't Hulk be given 3 times more space for crystals than the Skiff, since it has 3 times more strip miners? Or at least twice as much?
The Skiff's designed to be somewhat self sufficient. The Hulk is designed to rely on other ships to allow it to focus solely on mining yield. Compare RL mining equipment. The biggest equipment, capable of shoveling vast amount of Ore can't actually do anything under their own power. They have to be hooked up to an electrical grid, they need a fleet of Dump trucks to keep up with their output, they need constant maintenance, they have to be disassembled to move any sort of distance, they're generally an incredible pain to set up, but they compensate by moving more earth than any other machine. Smaller equipment is much less reliant on other equipment, but doesn't move as much earth. That....is a good example. +1 from me.
I may not like you or your point of view but you have a right to voice it. |

Anvil44
Independent Traders and Builders MPA
107
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:45:00 -
[2689] - Quote
Hypercake Mix wrote:I think they need to bring the tank of the Exhumers up a few more notches. We still don't know what the Destroyer rebalancing and beyond will bring. This sure sounds like troll to me...however, I will bite. What destroyer rebalancing are you referring to? I haven't heard of anything to change what was done not too long ago.
The more I think on things, the more I would like to see being able to buff exhumers by choice as opposed to such a huge jump on the inherent tanks. They did need some improving for sure, (excluding Hulk) but doing too much of it for the miners is not right. Give them the good base that a nice solid ship should have (it should be strong and bulky by nature, able to stand up to a fair bit of damage by sheer bulk) but nothing too extreme. Then make the give them special bonuses for PowerGrid and/or CPU bonus when using specific types of modules, much as the latest BCs have it with their BS sized guns. So a miner can choose between maximum yield or that great tank...or a nice balance.
I may not like you or your point of view but you have a right to voice it. |

Pipa Porto
613
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:45:00 -
[2690] - Quote
Hypercake Mix wrote:I think they need to bring the tank of the Exhumers up a few more notches. We still don't know what the Destroyer rebalancing and beyond will bring.
The Skiff can put up some 80k EHP with MLUs. That's plenty of Tank for any imaginable mining situation.
The point of the change is so that you change ships when your needs change, not just change fits. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Hypercake Mix
Magical Rainbow Bakery
7
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:48:00 -
[2691] - Quote
Anvil44 wrote:Hypercake Mix wrote:I think they need to bring the tank of the Exhumers up a few more notches. We still don't know what the Destroyer rebalancing and beyond will bring. This sure sounds like troll to me...however, I will bite. What destroyer rebalancing are you referring to? I haven't heard of anything to change what was done not too long ago. The more I think on things, the more I would like to see being able to buff exhumers by choice as opposed to such a huge jump on the inherent tanks. They did need some improving for sure, (excluding Hulk) but doing too much of it for the miners is not right. Give them the good base that a nice solid ship should have (it should be strong and bulky by nature, able to stand up to a fair bit of damage by sheer bulk) but nothing too extreme. Then perhaps give them special bonuses for PowerGrid and/or CPU bonus when using specific types of modules, much as the latest BCs have it with their BS sized guns. So a miner can choose between maximum yield or that great tank...or a nice balance.
The whole Tiericide thing? They're going up from Frigates and slowly making every ship worth flying? The thing where they're thinking of splitting Destroyers and Battlecruisers skills into separate racial skills? The possibility of having more T1 Destroyers exist in the future? |

Pipa Porto
614
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:55:00 -
[2692] - Quote
Hypercake Mix wrote:The whole Tiericide thing? They're going up from Frigates and slowly making every ship worth flying? The thing where they're thinking of splitting Destroyers and Battlecruisers skills into separate racial skills? The possibility of having more T1 Destroyers exist in the future?
Somehow I doubt any of the new Dessies will be 5 times cheaper or 5 times gankier (at the same price) to make the Skiff a viable gank target. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Anvil44
Independent Traders and Builders MPA
107
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 20:56:00 -
[2693] - Quote
Hypercake Mix wrote:Anvil44 wrote:Hypercake Mix wrote:I think they need to bring the tank of the Exhumers up a few more notches. We still don't know what the Destroyer rebalancing and beyond will bring. This sure sounds like troll to me...however, I will bite. What destroyer rebalancing are you referring to? I haven't heard of anything to change what was done not too long ago. The more I think on things, the more I would like to see being able to buff exhumers by choice as opposed to such a huge jump on the inherent tanks. They did need some improving for sure, (excluding Hulk) but doing too much of it for the miners is not right. Give them the good base that a nice solid ship should have (it should be strong and bulky by nature, able to stand up to a fair bit of damage by sheer bulk) but nothing too extreme. Then perhaps give them special bonuses for PowerGrid and/or CPU bonus when using specific types of modules, much as the latest BCs have it with their BS sized guns. So a miner can choose between maximum yield or that great tank...or a nice balance. The whole Tiericide thing? They're going up from Frigates and slowly making every ship worth flying? The thing where they're thinking of splitting Destroyers and Battlecruisers skills into separate racial skills? The possibility of having more T1 Destroyers exist in the future? Ah that skill split off. Don't see that specifically as causing buff nor nerf. Possibility of future destroyers happening? Well, that's the same as saying they are thinking of coming up with more exhumers. No details = no worries. If they were saying "we're looking at another destroyer designed around using medium sized guns - perfect for high alphas" then I would be worried. As it is now, there is too little information to worry about or to allow one to begin designing some sort of 'ship design response' to deal with this perceived threat.
I may not like you or your point of view but you have a right to voice it. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
131
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 21:00:00 -
[2694] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:The Skiff can put up some 80k EHP with MLUs.
Assuming no fleet boost and overheating. No, it can't with T1 shield resists profile. |

MIrple
BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team
35
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 21:06:00 -
[2695] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:The Skiff can put up some 80k EHP with MLUs. Assuming no fleet boost and overheating. No, it can't with T1 shield resists profile.
Show some proof. You come onto these forums and post but never bask them up. You were already proved wrong in a different forum when you said that the Hulk had a 25% reduction in EHP. |

Pipa Porto
614
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 21:09:00 -
[2696] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:The Skiff can put up some 80k EHP with MLUs. Assuming no fleet boost and overheating. No, it can't with T1 shield resists profile.
I'm repeating numbers from a thread with people who have modified their Pyfa. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Hypercake Mix
Magical Rainbow Bakery
7
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 21:13:00 -
[2697] - Quote
Anvil44 wrote:Ah that skill split off. Don't see that specifically as causing buff nor nerf. Possibility of future destroyers happening? Well, that's the same as saying they are thinking of coming up with more exhumers. No details = no worries. If they were saying "we're looking at another destroyer designed around using medium sized guns - perfect for high alphas" then I would be worried. As it is now, there is too little information to worry about or to allow one to begin designing some sort of 'ship design response' to deal with this perceived threat.
If they're designing the EHP of Hulks, Mackinaws, Covetors, and Retrievers around suicide ganking, while designing the Skiff and Procurer to survive fights in low-sec and beyond, the appearance of a medium gun destroyer would mean having to redo the those EHP numbers again, requiring CCP's math squad to set aside work-hours to essentially redo something they just recently did. IF the EHP was designed around suicide ganking. But yeah. Doing something and then redoing shortly after is bad design and wasted resources that could be better put to use say... making Orca's fully scanable. |

Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
159
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 21:22:00 -
[2698] - Quote
highsec mining is low reward, imo it deserves to be low risk. I feel like a small fitting increase and/or slight EHP buff would do, imo it is just silly that a hulk can die to a solo destroyer. okay okay tbh I don't really have much pity for people that don't train any core skills and fit 2 expanders and 2 cargo optimizers. but I just don't buy that the only viable highsec mining fit is nothing but buffer/fitting mods.
and yes a t3 with no tank (and/or gaping resist hole) can die to 1-2 tornado volleys rather easily, but their options for tanking are so much greater than on a hulk. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
351
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 21:27:00 -
[2699] - Quote
Chainsaw Plankton wrote:highsec mining is low reward, imo it deserves to be low risk. I feel like a small fitting increase and/or slight EHP buff would do, imo it is just silly that a hulk can die to a solo destroyer. okay okay tbh I don't really have much pity for people that don't train any core skills and fit 2 expanders and 2 cargo optimizers. but I just don't buy that the only viable highsec mining fit is nothing but buffer/fitting mods.
and yes a t3 with no tank (and/or gaping resist hole) can die to 1-2 tornado volleys rather easily, but their options for tanking are so much greater than on a hulk.
3rd most profitable ore is a high sec ore. if high sec mining is low reward that just means mining is low reward. not really relevant but i thought it needed pointing out. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Hypercake Mix
Magical Rainbow Bakery
7
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 21:36:00 -
[2700] - Quote
Chainsaw Plankton wrote:okay okay tbh I don't really have much pity for people that don't train any core skills and fit 2 expanders and 2 cargo optimizers. A new player with a set interest in mining approaches your mining corp. Do you tell him that he needs to make a choice between being useless or being a liability for a month?
I know it's an extreme case, but it sucks when you can't convince people to keep playing EVE for these reasons. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 .. 119 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |