| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
642
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 09:59:00 -
[3181] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Like that would work, you perfectly well know you follow the party line so any thing pointed out to you like, I don't know this thread, you will just deny.
So what you're saying is that you have no evidence of collusion to present? If that is the case, on what good faith basis were you accusing me of such? Exactly what I said. Will admit there brainwashing must be good, you don't even realize you look like a mindless drone. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Pipa Porto
848
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 10:02:00 -
[3182] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Sorry, I meant to add the caveat "for mining." Since that's a bait ship. So? Do you have a problem with bait ships? Not at all. But the stated purpose of the Skiff is to be a mining ship with a bunch of EHP for, and I'll quote the Dev Blog, Quote:The Procurer and Skiff are made for protection against suicide gank, or NPCs, by giving a large enough buffer to react to incoming attacks, while paying for that with a lower mining yield. So, since the Mackinaw provides sufficient protection against Suicide Gank to render it rare enough to be ignored (and all the Exhumers can easily deal with belt rats), what is the purpose of the Skiff in the context of mining? So, you are saying that ships can't be used for any other purpose other than what they were made for? If I want to mine in a destroyer I will mine in a destroyer, you're not the one who tells me what I'm allowed to do.
Where did I say ships can't be used for any other purpose other than what they were made for?
What I said was that if a ship is effectively entirely outclassed by another ship in their class, then either they're underpowered or the ship outclassing them is overpowered. In the case of the Skiff, the Mackinaw has a better Yield, a bigger Ore bay, and tanks enough that Suicide Ganking operates at a significant loss. So the Skiff is effectively entirely outclassed. Buffing the Mack doesn't do anything, because the issue is that, for mining, tank after a certain point doesn't really matter, and buffing the other 2 useful stats just makes it another Mackinaw. So, to fix the problem of the Skiff being outclassed by ships that are supposed to be different, yet equal, you have to fix the overpowered buff to the EHP of Mackinaws and (to a lesser extent) Hulks. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
848
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 10:03:00 -
[3183] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Like that would work, you perfectly well know you follow the party line so any thing pointed out to you like, I don't know this thread, you will just deny.
So what you're saying is that you have no evidence of collusion to present? If that is the case, on what good faith basis were you accusing me of such? Exactly what I said. Will admit there brainwashing must be good, you don't even realize you look like a mindless drone.
Right now, your refusal to present your evidence simply makes it look like you have none. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
642
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 10:07:00 -
[3184] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Like that would work, you perfectly well know you follow the party line so any thing pointed out to you like, I don't know this thread, you will just deny.
So what you're saying is that you have no evidence of collusion to present? If that is the case, on what good faith basis were you accusing me of such? Exactly what I said. Will admit there brainwashing must be good, you don't even realize you look like a mindless drone. Right now, your refusal to present your evidence simply makes it look like you have none. No the fact you are entering new posts into what essentially is the evidence just makes you look like a mindless drone, unable to think for yourself but I am sure your masters appreciate the service. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Pipa Porto
848
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 10:12:00 -
[3185] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Like that would work, you perfectly well know you follow the party line so any thing pointed out to you like, I don't know this thread, you will just deny.
So what you're saying is that you have no evidence of collusion to present? If that is the case, on what good faith basis were you accusing me of such? Exactly what I said. Will admit there brainwashing must be good, you don't even realize you look like a mindless drone. Right now, your refusal to present your evidence simply makes it look like you have none. No the fact you are entering new posts into what essentially is the evidence just makes you look like a mindless drone, unable to think for yourself but I am sure your masters appreciate the service.
Agreement is evidence of collusion now? Well I'll be.
Well, then, by your reasoning, I must be colluding with Ronald Reagan(I agree with a bunch of his policies), CCP(agree with a bunch of things that they do), You(I've probably agreed with you before), and the Supreme Court of the United States(agree with a bunch of their rulings too). EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
642
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 10:15:00 -
[3186] - Quote
100% agreement is. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 10:30:00 -
[3187] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote: The rare, clever miner who tanked his Hulk; well, he weathered the storm - and reaped the benefits as mineral prices rose.
Lol, I just read there are clever miners who tanked his hull and raped the benfeits.  There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper. |

Pipa Porto
848
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 10:31:00 -
[3188] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:100% agreement is.
So go ahead and prove 100% agreement. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
643
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 10:52:00 -
[3189] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote:100% agreement is. So go ahead and prove 100% agreement. Yawn... Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Pipa Porto
848
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 10:56:00 -
[3190] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote:100% agreement is. So go ahead and prove 100% agreement. Yawn...
I'm not forcing you to keep digging yourself in deeper by making more and more outlandish claims. You're making those claims all by yourself. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
643
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 10:58:00 -
[3191] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote:100% agreement is. So go ahead and prove 100% agreement. Yawn... I'm not forcing you to keep digging yourself in deeper by making more and more outlandish claims. You're making those claims all by yourself. Fair enough I will just rub your nose in it on the next thread, after your masters decide they want something nerfed or buffed. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Pipa Porto
848
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 11:06:00 -
[3192] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote:100% agreement is. So go ahead and prove 100% agreement. Yawn... I'm not forcing you to keep digging yourself in deeper by making more and more outlandish claims. You're making those claims all by yourself. Fair enough I will just rub your nose in it on the next thread, after your masters decide they want something nerfed or buffed.
So you've found evidence to show collusion or 100% agreement as you've claimed? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
157
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 11:31:00 -
[3193] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:What I said was that if a ship is effectively entirely outclassed by another ship in their class, then either they're underpowered or the ship outclassing them is overpowered. In the case of the Skiff, the Mackinaw has a better Yield, a bigger Ore bay, and tanks enough that Suicide Ganking operates at a significant loss. So the Skiff is effectively entirely outclassed. Buffing the Mack doesn't do anything, because the issue is that, for mining, tank after a certain point doesn't really matter, and buffing the other 2 useful stats just makes it another Mackinaw. So, to fix the problem of the Skiff being outclassed by ships that are supposed to be different, yet equal, you have to fix the overpowered buff to the EHP of Mackinaws and (to a lesser extent) Hulks.
It's very difficult to fit 7 Tachs to Geddon and deal 1100 dps at 50km. Nerf the Nightmare! |

Pipa Porto
848
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 11:48:00 -
[3194] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:What I said was that if a ship is effectively entirely outclassed by another ship in their class, then either they're underpowered or the ship outclassing them is overpowered. In the case of the Skiff, the Mackinaw has a better Yield, a bigger Ore bay, and tanks enough that Suicide Ganking operates at a significant loss. So the Skiff is effectively entirely outclassed. Buffing the Mack doesn't do anything, because the issue is that, for mining, tank after a certain point doesn't really matter, and buffing the other 2 useful stats just makes it another Mackinaw. So, to fix the problem of the Skiff being outclassed by ships that are supposed to be different, yet equal, you have to fix the overpowered buff to the EHP of Mackinaws and (to a lesser extent) Hulks. It's very difficult to fit 7 Tachs to Geddon and deal 1100 dps at 50km. Nerf the Nightmare!
A Geddon is a T1 Battleship. A Nightmare is a Pirate Faction Battleship.
I'll let CCP Ytterbium explain what relationship those two different classes are meant to have with each other.
From this Blog. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
157
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 13:36:00 -
[3195] - Quote
Do you want this rebalance thing canceled? Do you want the old system back? The one where experienced players told new miners to train to Retriever as soon as possible and then skip everything else and go straight to Hulk.
You had a chance to speak up but you didn't. Changes were on SiSi long before patch landed on live server. |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
1263
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 13:48:00 -
[3196] - Quote
Wow, lots of folks failed critical thinking...
All Pipa is saying is that since the Mack can tank enough to survive a cost based gank (and is great all other ways), there is no reason to fly a Skiff for mining.
And he's right. The only people who fly Skiffs are those who are either: 1) foolish, 2) not mining with it, or 3) bored and like its colors better than the Mack...
Sure, the Skiff has a great tank. But because the Mack can tank very well, and will almost always (if not always) mine better than the Skiff, the Skiff has not been sufficiently balanced (or the Mack hasn't...).
I think the Hulk is fine. Works for what CCP said it should, and has the drawbacks that mean it isn't the best at everything. The Mack could lose a little EHP (still above the Hulk, but closer than now). And with that change to the Mack, the Skiff would be fine.
Well... I do think all of them should get a nice CPU bump. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
157
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 13:55:00 -
[3197] - Quote
Solution: reduce Mack's tanked EHP to 10k.
Problem solved! |

Pipa Porto
849
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 14:21:00 -
[3198] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Do you want this rebalance thing canceled? Do you want the old system back? The one where experienced players told new miners to train to Retriever as soon as possible and then skip everything else and go straight to Hulk. You had a chance to speak up but you didn't. Changes were on SiSi long before patch landed on live server.
Where in the world did I say that I preferred one ship in a class (Exhumers are very clearly a single class) to be dominant over the others?
Wait, I said the exact opposite thing. Good job with the reading thing.
Right now, the torch of the Exhumer class has simply passed from the Hulk to the Mackinaw. The Mackinaw tanks enough that Suicide Ganking is not a concern, and for small fleets yields the best (compared to spending a slot on hauler support), and is convenient.
So instead of people saying to newbies "train Retriever > Hulk," they're saying "train Retriever > Mackinaw," which isn't exactly different. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
849
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 14:23:00 -
[3199] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Solution: reduce Mack's tanked EHP to 10k.
Problem solved!
Point to where someone involved in this thread (other than you) suggested that.
Though yes, that would solve this specific problem (and lead to a new problem of the Skiff overshadowing everything because of it's 15k m3 Ore Hold). EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
157
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 14:52:00 -
[3200] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Solution: reduce Mack's tanked EHP to 10k.
Problem solved! Point to where someone involved in this thread (other than you) suggested that. Though yes, that would solve this specific problem (and lead to a new problem of the Skiff overshadowing everything because of it's 15k m3 Ore Hold).
Reduce Skiff's ore hold to 1000 m3.
Problem solved!
I know what you're trying to do: you try to make suicide ganking a viable profession. |

Pipa Porto
849
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 16:00:00 -
[3201] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Solution: reduce Mack's tanked EHP to 10k.
Problem solved! Point to where someone involved in this thread (other than you) suggested that. Though yes, that would solve this specific problem (and lead to a new problem of the Skiff overshadowing everything because of it's 15k m3 Ore Hold). Reduce Skiff's ore hold to 1000 m3. And EHP to 2k. Problem solved! I know what you're trying to do: you try to make suicide ganking a viable profession.
Welcome. back.
And yes, I am. Because otherwise, HS mining is a risk free enterprise. Risk free enterprises aren't good for the game. Is there some reason why HS miners deserve to be the only people in the game who run no risk of loss in the performance of their economic activities? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Buck Futz
Suddenly Violence Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
69
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 16:08:00 -
[3202] - Quote
Personally, I really have no problem with the Skiff, in concept.
But the Mackinaw (and Retriever) was overbuffed to the point where it overshadowed all others. Its pretty clear that miners value the AFK-cargobay above all other assets.
Easiest solution to this mess?
SWITCH the Hulk and Mackinaw's EHP.
Hulk already requires miner attention - via its small, rapidly filled Ore Bay.
Mackinaw has huge cargobay - but make it more vulnerable to ganking. Miners naturally want to AFK with it, yet the lower EHP puts them at risk to ganking, forcing them to keep an eye on things.
Some semblance of tension and balance is achieved.
REAL TIERICIDE: Hulk - fastest miner, 2nd most EHP - balanced by pain in the ass Ore bay. Mack - weakest EHP, maximum cargo - AFK-ability balanced by risk of ganking. Skiff - highest EHP, less cargo, less yield - for mining when you know ganking is going on.
This way, there is no longer a 'slam dunk' decision, pushing everyone out of Hulks and into Macks.
|

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
157
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 16:16:00 -
[3203] - Quote
Thank you for viruses.
Pipa Porto wrote:And yes, I am. Because otherwise, HS mining is a risk free enterprise. Risk free enterprises aren't good for the game. Is there some reason why HS miners deserve to be the only people in the game who run no risk of loss in the performance of their economic activities?
So, make so that suicide ganking barges/exhumers doesn't involve any investment from gankers. Means barges/exhumers should be gankable with noobships.
Perfect solution for the game about griefing risk averse people. Doesn't break the game in any way.
Oh, and make it so that if you gank with noobship Concord doesn't spawn. |

betoli
Ketogenic Killzone
34
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 16:19:00 -
[3204] - Quote
Corina Jarr wrote:Wow, lots of folks failed critical thinking...
All Pipa is saying is that since the Mack can tank enough to survive a cost based gank (and is great all other ways), there is no reason to fly a Skiff for mining.
And he's right. The only people who fly Skiffs are those who are either: 1) foolish, 2) not mining with it, or 3) bored and like its colors better than the Mack...
Sure, the Skiff has a great tank. But because the Mack can tank very well, and will almost always (if not always) mine better than the Skiff, the Skiff has not been sufficiently balanced (or the Mack hasn't...).
I'd drop its price. It looks like its trading at about 3/4 of a Mack. Most people taking a barge into risky areas would probably want lower investment point. The tank beyond a certain point is rather pointless, but I wouldn't bother lowering it. I would instead make it either faster or cheaper or cloakier.
|

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
1263
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 18:16:00 -
[3205] - Quote
Buck Futz wrote:Personally, I really have no problem with the Skiff, in concept.
But the Mackinaw (and Retriever) was overbuffed to the point where it overshadowed all others. Its pretty clear that miners value the AFK-cargobay above all other assets.
Easiest solution to this mess?
SWITCH the Hulk and Mackinaw's EHP.
Hulk already requires miner attention - via its small, rapidly filled Ore Bay.
Mackinaw has huge cargobay - but make it more vulnerable to ganking. Miners naturally want to AFK with it, yet the lower EHP puts them at risk to ganking, forcing them to keep an eye on things.
Some semblance of tension and balance is achieved.
REAL TIERICIDE: Hulk - fastest miner, 2nd most EHP - balanced by pain in the ass Ore bay. Mack - weakest EHP, maximum cargo - AFK-ability balanced by risk of ganking. Skiff - highest EHP, less cargo, less yield - for mining when you know ganking is going on.
This way, there is no longer a 'slam dunk' decision, pushing everyone out of Hulks and into Macks.
Like it... |

Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
17
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 18:31:00 -
[3206] - Quote
Buck Futz wrote:Personally, I really have no problem with the Skiff, in concept.
But the Mackinaw (and Retriever) was overbuffed to the point where it overshadowed all others. Its pretty clear that miners value the AFK-cargobay above all other assets.
Easiest solution to this mess?
SWITCH the Hulk and Mackinaw's EHP.
Hulk already requires miner attention - via its small, rapidly filled Ore Bay.
Mackinaw has huge cargobay - but make it more vulnerable to ganking. Miners naturally want to AFK with it, yet the lower EHP puts them at risk to ganking, forcing them to keep an eye on things.
Some semblance of tension and balance is achieved.
REAL TIERICIDE: Hulk - fastest miner, 2nd most EHP - balanced by pain in the ass Ore bay. Mack - weakest EHP, maximum cargo - AFK-ability balanced by risk of ganking. Skiff - highest EHP, less cargo, less yield - for mining when you know ganking is going on.
This way, there is no longer a 'slam dunk' decision, pushing everyone out of Hulks and into Macks.
This sounds good.
Skiff is fine. Hulk is underperforming in relation to both the Skiff and the Mack. Switching the tank would solve this. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
157
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 19:29:00 -
[3207] - Quote
Mara Pahrdi wrote:Hulk is underperforming in relation to both the Skiff and the Mack. Switching the tank would solve this.
Triple the yield -> problem solved!
Drop EHP to ~3k. |

Pipa Porto
849
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 04:43:00 -
[3208] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Thank you for viruses. Pipa Porto wrote:And yes, I am. Because otherwise, HS mining is a risk free enterprise. Risk free enterprises aren't good for the game. Is there some reason why HS miners deserve to be the only people in the game who run no risk of loss in the performance of their economic activities? So, make so that suicide ganking barges/exhumers doesn't involve any investment from gankers. Means barges/exhumers should be gankable with noobships. Perfect solution for the game about griefing risk averse people. Doesn't break the game in any way. Oh, and make it so that if you gank with noobship Concord doesn't spawn.
Sounds like you don't understand what .jpgs are.
Secondly, when you point out where I said any of that (besides the hilarious, but irrelevant fact that any ship can be suicide ganked by enough newb ships), I'll stop making fun of your blatantly obvious attempts at setting up straw men (first link was a picture of straw, second link was the symbol of Mars, also commonly used as the symbol for man). EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
849
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 04:54:00 -
[3209] - Quote
Buck Futz wrote:REAL TIERICIDE: Hulk - fastest miner, 2nd most EHP - balanced by pain in the ass Ore bay. Mack - weakest EHP, maximum cargo - AFK-ability balanced by risk of ganking. Skiff - highest EHP, less cargo, less yield - for mining when you know ganking is going on.
This way, there is no longer a 'slam dunk' decision, pushing everyone out of Hulks and into Macks.
That's an improvement over the current situation, but still runs into the problem of one ship being effectively worthless. The Hulk would then be able to tank enough to remove any significant risk of suicide ganking, and the Skiff has the same cargo as the previous Cargo hulk while being nigh-invulnerable. So why would you ever use a Mackinaw.
I don't see any reason for the Hulk and Mack to have different tanks, nor do I see any reason for the Mack and Skiff to have different Yields, nor do I see any reason for the Hulk and Skiff to have different cargo bays.
Let each one have one pillar of the three useful ones where it flies high. Give the Skiff its current fantastic tank, but make it just as much effort to use as the Hulk (as far as hauling) so you have to pay attention to avoid waste. Give the Hulk its current great yield, but let it be vulnerable, so you have to pay attention to keep it safe. Give the Mack it's current fantastic Hold, so you don't need a hauler to support it, but let it be vulnerable, so you have to pay attention to keep it safe.
The problem with just changing the Mackinaw is that if you do it enough to make it require active safety measures to remain unprofitable to gank, the Skiff becomes purely dominant over it because of its 15k Ore bay. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
849
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 04:58:00 -
[3210] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Mara Pahrdi wrote:Hulk is underperforming in relation to both the Skiff and the Mack. Switching the tank would solve this. Triple the yield -> problem solved! Drop EHP to ~3k.
Bad Jorma. No Strawmen. Bad. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |