Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 13:13:00 -
[451] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Ta for the cleanup, some posters were getting a little overexcited, myself included  . What some people fail to realise is that the forums, and some external Eve related sites, are very much part of the metagame, some of those people are new to the game, some are not, either way, it does need to be said that in Eve the metagame is very much part of the game itself.
While this is true, there are limits to it. There are some lines you just don't cross. |

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
274
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 13:31:00 -
[452] - Quote
Anslo wrote:There are some lines you just don't cross.
I agree. It's a shame to see the miner defence committee resort to flaming and name-calling out of frustration. Even the OP, as a representative for the miners, starts off on an insulting and very unprofessional tirade, singling out an individual for attack. It's no wonder miners have a reputation of being likened to philistines when they present themselves this way.
|

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 13:49:00 -
[453] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Anslo wrote:There are some lines you just don't cross. I agree. It's a shame to see the miner defence committee resort to flaming and name-calling out of frustration. Even the OP, as a representative for the miners, starts off on an insulting and very unprofessional tirade, singling out an individual for attack. It's no wonder miners have a reputation of being likened to philistines when they present themselves this way.
You are misrepresenting my quote. I was referring to James' egging-on posts attempting to solicit abusive reposes on purpose. Please do not take my posts out of contexts for your own purposes. Thank you. |

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
275
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:02:00 -
[454] - Quote
He hasn't posted in this thread, as far as I'm aware. Do you mean to say he's provoking the miners to flame people in this thread? I'm not sure I fully understand what you mean. |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:05:00 -
[455] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Riot Girl wrote:Anslo wrote:There are some lines you just don't cross. I agree. It's a shame to see the miner defence committee resort to flaming and name-calling out of frustration. Even the OP, as a representative for the miners, starts off on an insulting and very unprofessional tirade, singling out an individual for attack. It's no wonder miners have a reputation of being likened to philistines when they present themselves this way. You are misrepresenting my quote. I was referring to James' egging-on posts attempting to solicit abusive reposes on purpose. Please do not take my posts out of contexts for your own purposes. Thank you. Makes ambiguous statement, gets mad when someone uses it "out of context".
Also, I have seen far, far worse from miner's compared to anything James of his "agents" have ever typed. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:07:00 -
[456] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:He hasn't posted in this thread, as far as I'm aware. Do you mean to say he's provoking the miners to flame people in this thread? I'm not sure I fully understand what you mean. I'm referring to his website.
Some Rando wrote: Makes ambiguous statement, gets mad when someone uses it "out of context".
Also, I have seen far, far worse from miner's compared to anything James of his "agents" have ever typed.
Please point out where I was "mad" in that post.
And while your last statement may be true, it still does not make it right. |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:10:00 -
[457] - Quote
Anslo wrote:And while your last statement may be true, it still does not make it right. Make what right, the statement? If it's true, then it's "right". |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
1609
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:10:00 -
[458] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Riot Girl wrote:Anslo wrote:There are some lines you just don't cross. I agree. It's a shame to see the miner defence committee resort to flaming and name-calling out of frustration. Even the OP, as a representative for the miners, starts off on an insulting and very unprofessional tirade, singling out an individual for attack. It's no wonder miners have a reputation of being likened to philistines when they present themselves this way. You are misrepresenting my quote. I was referring to James' egging-on posts attempting to solicit abusive reposes on purpose. Please do not take my posts out of contexts for your own purposes. Thank you.
Crikey! He is a cranky one! I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:13:00 -
[459] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Anslo wrote:And while your last statement may be true, it still does not make it right. Make what right, the statement? If it's true, then it's "right".
Not the statement, the fact that miners take abuse. |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:19:00 -
[460] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Not the statement, the fact that miners take abuse. See, that's what gets me. Here we're playing a PvP sandbox game and we have a subset of "players" (one wonders why we keep up the pretense, they're actually robots) who "take" abuse. Given that we're: A. Playing a video game B. Playing a PvP game C. Playing a sandbox game I have to ask why anyone is forced to "take abuse"?
I have no pity, whatsoever, for people who consider themselves "victims" in a video game. |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
1610
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:21:00 -
[461] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Some Rando wrote:Anslo wrote:And while your last statement may be true, it still does not make it right. Make what right, the statement? If it's true, then it's "right". Not the statement, the fact that miners take abuse.
I don't think you are stupid enough (though correct me if I am wrong and I'll change this post accordingly) not to notice this; but carebears in general are very loud, self-serving, self-victimizing and goes to length to demonize any group or individual that is enjoying core game design, like PvP. I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:34:00 -
[462] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Anslo wrote:Not the statement, the fact that miners take abuse. See, that's what gets me. Here we're playing a PvP sandbox game and we have a subset of "players" (one wonders why we keep up the pretense, they're actually robots) who "take" abuse. Given that we're: A. Playing a video game B. Playing a PvP game C. Playing a sandbox game I have to ask why anyone is forced to "take abuse"? I have no pity, whatsoever, for people who consider themselves "victims" in a video game.
Forced because they wish to do x in a game, and subset A abuses subset B for doing x. If subset B went to do y or z, they would not be enjoying the "sandbox" as you so call it. That is why it's forced. It's either do what they like/love, or do something they reall don't like because some loud mouth individual does not approve of their game play choice.
Alpheias wrote: I don't think you are stupid enough (though correct me if I am wrong and I'll change this post accordingly) not to notice this; but carebears in general are very loud, self-serving, self-victimizing and goes to length to demonize any group or individual that is enjoying core game design, like PvP.
Could say the same for nulbears during nul nerfs, low sec people for...everything, and gankers during the barge buff. They also demonized PvE and mining carebears. |

Robert De'Arneth
176
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:37:00 -
[463] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Some Rando wrote:Anslo wrote:Not the statement, the fact that miners take abuse. See, that's what gets me. Here we're playing a PvP sandbox game and we have a subset of "players" (one wonders why we keep up the pretense, they're actually robots) who "take" abuse. Given that we're: A. Playing a video game B. Playing a PvP game C. Playing a sandbox game I have to ask why anyone is forced to "take abuse"? I have no pity, whatsoever, for people who consider themselves "victims" in a video game. Forced because they wish to do x in a game, and subset A abuses subset B for doing x. If subset B went to do y or z, they would not be enjoying the "sandbox" as you so call it. That is why it's forced. It's either do what they like/love, or do something they reall don't like because some loud mouth individual does not approve of their game play choice. Alpheias wrote: I don't think you are stupid enough (though correct me if I am wrong and I'll change this post accordingly) not to notice this; but carebears in general are very loud, self-serving, self-victimizing and goes to length to demonize any group or individual that is enjoying core game design, like PvP.
Could say the same for nulbears during nul nerfs, low sec people for...everything, and gankers during the barge buff. They also demonized PvE and mining carebears.
Logic has been lost in thred since page 1. You have not lived until you have been Wated by Jim!!-á-á |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:41:00 -
[464] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Forced because they wish to do x in a game, and subset A abuses subset B for doing x. If subset B went to do y or z, they would not be enjoying the "sandbox" as you so call it. That is why it's forced. It's either do what they like/love, or do something they reall don't like because some loud mouth individual does not approve of their game play choice. That's what's called "interaction". Miners affect every other player in the game and you're telling me they shouldn't have to interact with anyone else? Go play ******* Farmville.
If you're that distressed that someone might "interact" with you, you really need to stop playing multiplayer games, especially PvP sandbox games that thrive on interaction with other players. |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:46:00 -
[465] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Riot Girl wrote:He hasn't posted in this thread, as far as I'm aware. Do you mean to say he's provoking the miners to flame people in this thread? I'm not sure I fully understand what you mean. I'm referring to his website. I'm still not fully sure what you mean. Where on www.MinerBumping.com does James encourage anyone to post anything to the forums, let alone flaming and trolling posts?
|

Robert De'Arneth
177
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:51:00 -
[466] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Anslo wrote:Forced because they wish to do x in a game, and subset A abuses subset B for doing x. If subset B went to do y or z, they would not be enjoying the "sandbox" as you so call it. That is why it's forced. It's either do what they like/love, or do something they reall don't like because some loud mouth individual does not approve of their game play choice. That's what's called "interaction". Miners affect every other player in the game and you're telling me they shouldn't have to interact with anyone else? Go play ******* Farmville. If you're that distressed that someone might "interact" with you, you really need to stop playing multiplayer games, especially PvP sandbox games that thrive on interaction with other players.
Why do you make false claims that miners do not interact with people? I interact with people every time I login, even when offline by selling minerals. You have lost the plot dude, and you lying and acting like you know what every miner does is quite sad.
You are worse then the miners who cry about getting ganked. Let me clue in , pvp in this game involves the market not just ships. You have not lived until you have been Wated by Jim!!-á-á |

baltec1
Bat Country
2633
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:53:00 -
[467] - Quote
Anslo wrote:
Could say the same for nulbears during nul nerfs, low sec people for...everything, and gankers during the barge buff. They also demonized PvE and mining carebears.
We were simply defending our right to not have our playstyle removed because miners didnt like losing ships to their own stupidity and also trying to have balanced barges. Needless to say the bears managed to get both things and now we have unbalanced barges that cannot be profitably ganked.
End result is both parties got screwed over. |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:54:00 -
[468] - Quote
Robert De'Arneth wrote:Why do you make false claims that miners do not interact with people? I interact with people every time I login, even when offline by selling minerals. You have lost the plot dude, and you lying and acting like you know what every miner does is quite sad.
You are worse then the miners who cry about getting ganked. Let me clue in , pvp in this game involves the market not just ships. It involves all sorts of player versus player interaction, this is very true. Are you claiming miners should be exempt from a certain type of interaction? Some people prefer to blow up ships or interrupt your activities in order to affect you, what is wrong with them using those tools, in much the same way you use the market and a mining laser? |

Nanatoa
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
118
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:54:00 -
[469] - Quote
Robert De'Arneth wrote:Let me clue in , pvp in this game involves the market not just ships.
Look at this elite pvp'er, engaging in high-level interaction by selling his hard-earned ore in direct cut-throat competition with botters and afk'ers. I am sure you are showing them how wrong they are by undercutting their already craptastically low prices!
It is never too late to turn from the errors of your ways: He who repents of his sins is almost innocent.
MinerBumping.com |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:56:00 -
[470] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:That's what's called "interaction". Miners affect every other player in the game and you're telling me they shouldn't have to interact with anyone else? Go play ******* Farmville.
If you're that distressed that someone might "interact" with you, you really need to stop playing multiplayer games, especially PvP sandbox games that thrive on interaction with other players. I like how you immediately think I'm a miner from my statement alone. It clearly shows that you do not have the correct information to argue your point validly. This is shown more through your "farmville" reference.
It is a sandbox, not a war zone. Let the miners mine. Also, If I was so "distressed" by interaction, why would I be on the forums talking to you?
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:I'm still not fully sure what you mean. Where on www.MinerBumping.com does James encourage anyone to post anything to the forums, let alone flaming and trolling posts? His blogs point people out, egg them on, and goad people passive aggressively through seemingly innocuous posts. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:58:00 -
[471] - Quote
Some Rando wrote: Some people prefer to blow up ships or interrupt your activities in order to affect you, what is wrong with them using those tools, in much the same way you use the market and a mining laser?
What is wrong with miners wanting to use their tools to mine and mind their own business and their own corp/friends? |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 14:59:00 -
[472] - Quote
Robert De'Arneth wrote:Why do you make false claims that miners do not interact with people? I interact with people every time I login, even when offline by selling minerals. You have lost the plot dude, and you lying and acting like you know what every miner does is quite sad.
You are worse then the miners who cry about getting ganked. Let me clue in , pvp in this game involves the market not just ships. Let's quickly run through the schedule of the average miner - not you, the average miner. I don't care what you do.
- The miner logs on. He checks his sell orders, and undercuts the current lowest seller by 0.01 ISK.
- The miner activates his mining barge, undocks and warps to the ice belt.
- He selects an ice 'roid, activates his lasers, and goes to do something else.
- When he's filled his hold, he returns to station, processes the ore and lists whatever product he's made at 0.01 ISK below the current price.
- Repeat from step 2.
At no point in this cycle does the miner contribute to the gameplay of another person.
|

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:00:00 -
[473] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Robert De'Arneth wrote:Why do you make false claims that miners do not interact with people? I interact with people every time I login, even when offline by selling minerals. You have lost the plot dude, and you lying and acting like you know what every miner does is quite sad.
You are worse then the miners who cry about getting ganked. Let me clue in , pvp in this game involves the market not just ships. Let's quickly run through the schedule of the average miner - not you, the average miner. I don't care what you do.
- The miner logs on. He checks his sell orders, and undercuts the current lowest seller by 0.01 ISK.
- The miner activates his mining barge, undocks and warps to the ice belt.
- He selects an ice 'roid, activates his lasers, and goes to do something else.
- When he's filled his hold, he returns to station, processes the ore and lists whatever product he's made at 0.01 ISK below the current price.
- Repeat from step 2.
At no point in this cycle does the miner contribute to the gameplay of another person.
Why does he have to contribute anything? He doesn't owe anyone a contribution?
Also..why if your quote weird? |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:01:00 -
[474] - Quote
Anslo wrote:It is a sandbox, not a war zone. Let the miners mine. This is a terrible post.
Anslo wrote:What is wrong with miners wanting to use their tools to mine and mind their own business and their own corp/friends? There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. What is wrong with people bumping or blowing them up if they want to affect them? |

Robert De'Arneth
178
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:01:00 -
[475] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:Robert De'Arneth wrote:Let me clue in , pvp in this game involves the market not just ships. Look at this elite pvp'er, engaging in high-level interaction by selling his hard-earned ore in direct cut-throat competition with botters and afk'ers. I am sure you are showing them how wrong they are by undercutting their already craptastically low prices!
You somehow assume I need your approval, sorry James, I play the game I want. I know it hurts you, but oh well. You have not lived until you have been Wated by Jim!!-á-á |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:02:00 -
[476] - Quote
Anslo wrote: His blogs point people out, egg them on, and goad people passive aggressively through seemingly innocuous posts.
Perhaps you're misinterpreting them. The posts on www.MinerBumping.com aid people in understanding and correctly following the Code. Any examples that are used are solely for illustrative purposes.
If you're taking them the wrong way, I'm afraid that's your fault. At no point does James encourage anyone to post hurtful things on the forums.
Robert De'Arneth wrote:You somehow assume I need your approval, sorry James, I play the game I want. I know it hurts you, but oh well. Actually I think Nanatoa might have been gently poking fun at you.
|

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:03:00 -
[477] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:This is a terrible post. And your opinion matters due to what credibility?
Anslo wrote:There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. What is wrong with people bumping or blowing them up if they want to affect them? Blowing up is one thing. Bumping cannot be actively countered despite past arguments. The "counters" are (non-minmatar) duct tape fixes. Whether you agree with me or not is irrelevant to me. I believe it's unfair to them. |

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
276
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:03:00 -
[478] - Quote
Anslo wrote:What is wrong with miners wanting to use their tools to mine and mind their own business and their own corp/friends? There is nothing wrong with it, but they shouldn't be able to do it without the risk of being punished for it. Specifically 'mind their own business' i.e carrying on like there are no other players in the game or that other players should pose no threat to them and therefore require no attention or precautionary measures to counter their influence. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2633
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:03:00 -
[479] - Quote
Anslo wrote:
What is wrong with miners wanting to use their tools to mine and mind their own business and their own corp/friends?
Nothing at all.
Whats wrong with someone blowing up said miner because he was stupid and fitted no tank or bumping him to extort a ransom? |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:07:00 -
[480] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Perhaps you're misinterpreting them. The posts on www.MinerBumping.com aid people in understanding and correctly following the Code. Any examples that are used are solely for illustrative purposes. If you're taking them the wrong way, I'm afraid that's your fault. At no point does James encourage anyone to post hurtful things on the forums.
I like how you keep posting the website as if to annoy me with your constant advertising. Nice try though.
Your code is not in game rules and are not from the company or in game authority. Therefore your code is moot. Your illustrations are tailored to goad people on, anyone who speaks English can see that. Also, James through his actions egg on his own "followers" to target miners whether IG abuse or verbal abuse. Either way, his "followers" actions are his responsibility as the so called "Supreme Protector."
I am not taking them the wrong way, you are simply trying to troll me.
Riot Girl wrote:There is nothing wrong with it, but they shouldn't be able to do it without the risk of being punished for it. Specifically 'mind their own business' i.e carrying on like there are no other players in the game or that other players should pose no threat to them and therefore require no attention or precautionary measures to counter their influence. Without the risk of being punished? Sounds a lot like the miner bumpers situation too. Hmm... You also seem upset that miners are ignoring you or not interacting with you. Why?
baltec1 wrote:Anslo wrote:
What is wrong with miners wanting to use their tools to mine and mind their own business and their own corp/friends?
Nothing at all. Whats wrong with someone blowing up said miner because he was stupid and fitted no tank or bumping him to extort a ransom? Blowing up is one thing. Blow them up back. Bumping has no counter IG. If there was something like an anchor module that kept em stuck for 10 minutes to not be bumped, but easily ganked unless their tanked, then this would not be an issue at all. |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |