| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Robert De'Arneth
178
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:42:00 -
[511] - Quote
Andski wrote:Robert De'Arneth wrote:LOL, you have no way to enforce it all. You might find some idiots who will pay you, but do not kid yourself James, you have no real way to enforce it. Unless you mean people laughing at you as away to enforce it. Your ego is getting pretty big James.  They do have a real way to enforce it, hence all the miners whining about the bumping.
Well inform me how they can force me to pay them? I asked James already and he ignored it, so maybe you can help? Details please sir. You have not lived until you have been Wated by Jim!!-á-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5389
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:44:00 -
[512] - Quote
Robert De'Arneth wrote:Well inform me how they can force me to pay them? I asked James already and he ignored it, so maybe you can help? Details please sir.
They can't force you to pay it, but they can certainly deny you the ability to mine in that system. ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Robert De'Arneth
179
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:48:00 -
[513] - Quote
Andski wrote:Robert De'Arneth wrote:Well inform me how they can force me to pay them? I asked James already and he ignored it, so maybe you can help? Details please sir. They can't force you to pay it, but they can certainly deny you the ability to mine in that system.
So in fact, they have no way to enforce it, thank you. You have not lived until you have been Wated by Jim!!-á-á |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:50:00 -
[514] - Quote
Andski wrote:And what is "in-game authority?" Authority implies having the means to enforce a code, the code is "pay for the right to mine here and you won't be bumped." It's basic emergent gameplay. Sure it's emergent, but they still act like they're some sort of authority in high sec. My jimmies rustle slightly at this.
Dasola wrote:if bumping is all he does to miner, thats small hassle, set your mining ship to orbit asteroid your not mining  Get bumped and ship will automaticly return to mining range. While in theory that works...they bump them away faster than they can return, thus interrupting cycles.
|

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:51:00 -
[515] - Quote
Anslo wrote:No. They shouldn't have to leave because of some player with a vendetta against another person's gameplay. Then they might need to learn to defend themselves or find ways to deal with other people who have a vendetta against a type of gameplay.
It's not hard to avoid people you don't want to interact with, I do it all the time in game. The difference between me and most miners is that I put in the time, research, and practice to find out how to defend myself and avoid other people. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:51:00 -
[516] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:And just like before there are a lot of ways to counter it already. Miners didn't need the extra EHP and they sure as hell dont need a new anti bump module. Well, difference of opinion. But I'll respect it.
Riot Girl wrote:They do have something to counter it with. They have a brain and all they need to do is to learn to use it in a befitting manner. And they've used it to make a lot of interesting hot fixes to the issue, but nothing with real permanence or assurance. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:52:00 -
[517] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Then they might need to learn to defend themselves or find ways to deal with other people who have a vendetta against a type of gameplay.
It's not hard to avoid people you don't want to interact with, I do it all the time in game. The difference between me and most miners is that I put in the time, research, and practice to find out how to defend myself and avoid other people.
Instead of dragging this out, I'm going to agree to disagree. I don't feel like arguing the same point for another 50 posts. |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
1610
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:53:00 -
[518] - Quote
Anslo wrote: Could say the same for nulbears during nul nerfs, low sec people for...everything, and gankers during the barge buff. They also demonized PvE and mining carebears.
But the key difference here is a group of players that demand that CCP harshly punishes other players for interacting with this group, including actions taken against the "offending" players' account and it is not the "sociopaths" or "belligerent undesirables" that demand this. I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |

Robert De'Arneth
179
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:54:00 -
[519] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Anslo wrote:No. They shouldn't have to leave because of some player with a vendetta against another person's gameplay. Then they might need to learn to defend themselves or find ways to deal with other people who have a vendetta against a type of gameplay. It's not hard to avoid people you don't want to interact with, I do it all the time in game. The difference between me and most miners is that I put in the time, research, and practice to find out how to defend myself and avoid other people.
Oh us poor miners, we never look at local, we do not use Teamspeak or other such tools. I know I do not have 27 systems in which I keep mining ships, that would be to much for us poor miners to do. You have not lived until you have been Wated by Jim!!-á-á |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:57:00 -
[520] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Instead of dragging this out, I'm going to agree to disagree. I don't feel like arguing the same point for another 50 posts. You disagree with the fact that in a PvP game you might need to defend yourself from other players? |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:58:00 -
[521] - Quote
Robert De'Arneth wrote:Oh us poor miners, we never look at local, we do not use Teamspeak or other such tools. I know I do not have 27 systems in which I keep mining ships, that would be to much for us poor miners to do. Evidence points to that being the case. |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
1610
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:59:00 -
[522] - Quote
Robert De'Arneth wrote:Some Rando wrote:Anslo wrote:No. They shouldn't have to leave because of some player with a vendetta against another person's gameplay. Then they might need to learn to defend themselves or find ways to deal with other people who have a vendetta against a type of gameplay. It's not hard to avoid people you don't want to interact with, I do it all the time in game. The difference between me and most miners is that I put in the time, research, and practice to find out how to defend myself and avoid other people. Oh us poor miners, we never look at local, we do not use Teamspeak or other such tools. I know I do not have 27 systems in which I keep mining ships, that would be to much for us poor miners to do.
Oh, look, it is a clever miner!
Didn't see that one coming. I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
478
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:59:00 -
[523] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:But the key difference here is a group of players that demand that CCP harshly punishes other players for interacting with this group, including actions taken against the "offending" players' account and it is not the "sociopaths" or "belligerent undesirables" that demand this. Aggressive unstoppable action begets aggressive reactions I suppose. I don't blame them.
Some Rando wrote:You disagree with the fact that in a PvP game you might need to defend yourself from other players? I disagree that a sandbox game should have bullies keeping people in the real world from enjoying something they do without an actual mechanic to defend against it. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2638
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:00:00 -
[524] - Quote
Anslo wrote: I disagree that a sandbox game should have bullies keeping people in the real world from enjoying something they do without an actual mechanic to defend against it.
But there are ways to defend against it. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
478
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:02:00 -
[525] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:But there are ways to defend against it.
And as I said...I don't believe they are effective means. Effective would be a module or some such, not a duct tape "orbit" method (which doesn't work) or web method (which also doesn't work). Also just telling them to goto a different system may work, or they might just be followed. Either way, they're displaced. |

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
277
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:03:00 -
[526] - Quote
Anslo wrote:without an actual mechanic to defend against it. You keep repeating this. It's an entirely false statement. |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:03:00 -
[527] - Quote
Anslo wrote:I disagree that a sandbox game should have bullies keeping people in the real world from enjoying something they do without an actual mechanic to defend against it. Maybe if some people used their head, did some research, and practiced, they'd be able to defend against such tactics, huh?
I mean, it's just like the ganking thing. Instead of fitting a tank, making bookmarks and aligning, or figuring out other creative ways of doing things (like webbing each other for faster align), people just up and whined. They had plenty of tools to defend themselves and they didn't use them. Hell, they didn't even think about those tools.
Also, I take issue with "bullies". No one is forcing you to play a video game. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
478
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:04:00 -
[528] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:You keep repeating this. It's an entirely false statement.
No it's not. But this entire thread is an exercise in repletion since post 1, so why point out the obvious now? |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
458
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:04:00 -
[529] - Quote
Anslo wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Disgusting miner filth are not "minding their own business", they sell their rocks or manufacture with them. That is not minding their own business. That is directly influencing the market and availability of everything. Funny how that same "scum" helps supply you with your ships and equipment..
That's exactly my point, miners (I suppose I should have made a better distinction on the "scum" part - not all miners are bad people, just a lot of them) are part of the game as a whole. They have their role in the EVE universe, and it's a valid one. But they're not, in fact they are incapable of being, entirely separate from the rest of us.
It's a two way street. Miners play a role in the pricing, manufacture and availability of ships and modules for other players. Therefore the other players must play a part in mining (mining licenses, ganks, etc), for the sake of balance. You can't have one without the other.
The disgusting scum part comes into it when they dishonestly claim they are lone entities, and demand that they be immune from forms of interaction they do not like.
That's not how it works.
|

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
1610
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:05:00 -
[530] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Alpheias wrote:But the key difference here is a group of players that demand that CCP harshly punishes other players for interacting with this group, including actions taken against the "offending" players' account and it is not the "sociopaths" or "belligerent undesirables" that demand this. Aggressive unstoppable action begets aggressive reactions I suppose. I don't blame them.
And their solution to their woes, it being bumping by players or being attacked by players, is to ban the accounts or introduce a anti-bumping. That is not a aggressive reaction, it is ******* pathetic! I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:06:00 -
[531] - Quote
Anslo wrote:this entire thread is an exercise in repletion since post 1 This entire thread is an exercise in hilarious outrage at some guy who took a great extortion scheme and the means to enforce it, and blew it up into a metagame phenomenon. |

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
47
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:07:00 -
[532] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Anslo wrote:Not the statement, the fact that miners take abuse. See, that's what gets me. Here we're playing a PvP sandbox game and we have a subset of "players" (one wonders why we keep up the pretense, they're actually robots) who "take" abuse. Given that we're: A. Playing a video game B. Playing a PvP game C. Playing a sandbox game I have to ask why anyone is forced to "take abuse"? I have no pity, whatsoever, for people who consider themselves "victims" in a video game.
Because someone is taken advantage of regardless of real life or in game doesnt make it their fault. Miners are placed at a disadvantage from the jump. They have sp set to indy not pvp and the ships are indy ships not pvp.
Just because they are placed at this disadvantage doesnt mean they asked or deserved to be ganked. Yes some people dont fit correctly but there are people who do and there are people that take the extra steps and they still fall prey to the more organised gank teams.
People come here and try to place all the miners in the same catagory to justify their own ignorance and bias and hatred for a type of game play they dont like or understand.
This type of of ignorance can be found in abundance in real life and not just in this game. |

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
277
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:07:00 -
[533] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Also just telling them to goto a different system may work, or they might just be followed. Either way, they're displaced. Do you feel being displaced is a worthy reason to demand intervention from CCP? Is being forced to move to another system so game breaking that the whole community has to be punished? Is there a viable solution to this inconvenience that would not harm the quality of the experience the game offers for every single player? |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
461
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:08:00 -
[534] - Quote
Anslo wrote:baltec1 wrote:But there are ways to defend against it. And as I said...I don't believe they are effective means. Effective would be a module or some such, not a duct tape "orbit" method (which doesn't work) or web method (which also doesn't work). Also just telling them to goto a different system may work, or they might just be followed. Either way, they're displaced.
There is a 100% effective mechanic in place. Simply right click the Agents name and select "Give Money". Enter the license fee of 10 million isk and bobs your uncle. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
479
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:09:00 -
[535] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:This entire thread is an exercise in hilarious outrage at some guy who took a great extortion scheme and the means to enforce it, and blew it up into a metagame phenomenon. I'll give him that. I'd hire him for marketing at least.
Alpheias wrote:And their solution to their woes, it being bumping by players or being attacked by players, is to ban the accounts or introduce a anti-bumping module. That is not a aggressive reaction, it is ******* pathetic! Well, they're frustrated. Banning is a bit much, but the module I understand (also you clearly took the 'ban' posts a wee bit too seriously).
|

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
277
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:10:00 -
[536] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Riot Girl wrote:You keep repeating this. It's an entirely false statement. No it's not.
Of course it is. You even said yourself you can move to another system but dismissed it as being too inconvenient. Well if they don't want to move to another system, why not try surrounding themselves in a castle made of Jump Freighters? That would stop people bumping you. Of course that would take imagination and organization. Worst of all, it would ruin their boredom by forcing them to try out something fun. |

Robert De'Arneth
180
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:11:00 -
[537] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Anslo wrote:baltec1 wrote:But there are ways to defend against it. And as I said...I don't believe they are effective means. Effective would be a module or some such, not a duct tape "orbit" method (which doesn't work) or web method (which also doesn't work). Also just telling them to goto a different system may work, or they might just be followed. Either way, they're displaced. There is a 100% effective mechanic in place. Simply right click the Agents name and select "Give Money". Enter the license fee of 10 million isk and bobs your uncle.
More effective if you tell said agent to go f themselves, since it has proven they have no way to enforce this. Also not a bad idea to type to said agent, LMAO you idiot. That will really make the agent upset. I find with most children, if you laugh at them they get real mad. You have not lived until you have been Wated by Jim!!-á-á |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:12:00 -
[538] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:They have sp set to indy not pvp and the ships are indy ships not pvp. That's no one's fault but the miner's.
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:People come here and try to place all the miners in the same catagory to justify their own ignorance and bias and hatred for a type of game play they dont like or understand.
This type of of ignorance can be found in abundance in real life and not just in this game. This is awesome. It's almost as if you're trying to paint miners as RL minorities. The difference is that one is playing a video game by choice and the other has to live it. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
479
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:14:00 -
[539] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Do you feel being displaced is a worthy reason to demand intervention from CCP? Is being forced to move to another system so game breaking that the whole community has to be punished? Is there a viable solution to this inconvenience that would not harm the quality of the experience the game offers for every single player? Yes. If it blows up to Hulkageddon proportions, which sentiment analysis suggests, then nipping it in the proverbial bud would be nice to prevent future threadnaughts or miner whines and make room for, I don't know, good threads?
TheGunslinger42 wrote:There is a 100% effective mechanic in place. Simply right click the Agents name and select "Give Money". Enter the license fee of 10 million isk and bobs your uncle. Or not. They should not have to pay you to play. They pay CCP. As I tell all miners, never pay an extortionist from the bumper group. That's not a mechanic, it's a scam.
Riot Girl wrote:Of course it is. You even said yourself you can move to another system but dismissed it as being too inconvenient. Well if they don't want to move to another system, why not try surrounding themselves in a castle made of Jump Freighters? That would stop people bumping you. Of course that would take imagination and organization. Worst of all, it would ruin their boredom because it would be fun to try it out.
Why do you assume they find mining boring if they do it? Why can't people exist that enjoy mining? Apparently this is a hard concept to grasp...on another note a wall of freighters/jump freighters would be amazing to see. Blocking the Jita stargate like that? Now that'd be interesting.
|

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
1611
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:16:00 -
[540] - Quote
Anslo wrote:
Well, they're frustrated. Banning is a bit much, but the module I understand (also you clearly took the 'ban' posts a wee bit too seriously).
Sure. But how would you feel if a bunch of players demanded that CCP banned your account whenever you enjoyed the game? I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |