Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:08:00 -
[481] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Blowing up is one thing. Bumping cannot be actively countered despite past arguments. The "counters" are (non-minmatar) duct tape fixes. Whether you agree with me or not is irrelevant to me. I believe it's unfair to them. And your opinion matters due to what credibility? |

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
277
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:11:00 -
[482] - Quote
Anslo wrote:You also seem upset that miners are ignoring you or not interacting with you. Why? I am not upset that miners may ignore or refuse to interact with me. I have interacted with miners in the past and I found their company to be unsatisfactory.
|

baltec1
Bat Country
2633
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:12:00 -
[483] - Quote
Anslo wrote: Blowing up is one thing. Blow them up back. Bumping has no counter IG. If there was something like an anchor module that kept em stuck for 10 minutes to not be bumped, but easily ganked unless their tanked, then this would not be an issue at all.
There are a good number of mods in game to counter bumping already...
This really isnt an issue if miners stopped to think for a bit. But no, they are doing exactly the same thing as when they whined about ganking. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:12:00 -
[484] - Quote
Trollwoman wrote:No need to fear!
Trollwoman is here!
Dude your neck.
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: So what's the counter to a gate camp? Speed fits, taking another route, etc. Yet you can still be caught out by a gate camp. Does this make it a duct tape fix, in that it isn't comprehensive? Should every activity in the game have an absolute counter, or should we be content with making it harder to target us (in the case of miner bumping, there are certainly ways to make yourself harder to bump)?
As you see in my post above, I consider true fixes to be in game. For instance, there are warp stabs, speed fits, etc as you mentioned. There is no anchor or counter-bump modules. If there were, then the miner could not be bumped, but could nto avoid gank unless he was tanked. To me, then it's fair. The miners have a counter, but also risk a full fledge gank they can't avoid. Risk/Reward.
Some Rando wrote:And your opinion matters due to what credibility?
The credibility that I did not have to rely on the "go back to [insert game here]" mentality to counter an argument. Also post with your main.
Riot Girl wrote:I am not upset that miners may ignore or refuse to interact with me. I have interacted with miners in the past and I found their company to be unsatisfactory. Then why complain about their ignoring or noninteraction? It shouldn't bother you.
baltec1 wrote:
There are a good number of mods in game to counter bumping already...
This really isnt an issue if miners stopped to think for a bit. But no, they are doing exactly the same thing as when they whined about ganking.
There are "counters" to bumping, you're right...but not full mechanics. I don't know. I see your point though. I'm just jaded and bitter by the polarity of pvp vs. pve and am more pro-pve because of some pvpers mentality and attitudes towards anyone "playing it wrong." It's a game. |

Ghazu
235
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:12:00 -
[485] - Quote
Sandbox means that players decide whether a place will be a warzone or not. |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:14:00 -
[486] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Perhaps you're misinterpreting them. The posts on www.MinerBumping.com aid people in understanding and correctly following the Code. Any examples that are used are solely for illustrative purposes. If you're taking them the wrong way, I'm afraid that's your fault. At no point does James encourage anyone to post hurtful things on the forums. I like how you keep posting the website as if to annoy me with your constant advertising. Nice try though. Your code is not in game rules and are not from the company or in game authority. Therefore your code is moot. Your illustrations are tailored to goad people on, anyone who speaks English can see that. Also, James through his actions egg on his own "followers" to target miners whether IG abuse or verbal abuse. Either way, his "followers" actions are his responsibility as the so called "Supreme Protector." I am not taking them the wrong way, you are simply trying to troll me. Let's approach this sensibly.
We know that EVE is a sandbox. What does this mean? It means that EVE is a game where players are allowed to do whatever they like within the broadly defined mechanics created by CCP.
More specifically, this means that if a group of players (such as the one at www.MinerBumping.com) decides to create a set of rules (or dare I say it, a Code) and enforce it, it is far from moot. In fact, it is just as valid as CCP's rules as long as we can enforce it.
As for your claim that James is responsible for the actions of any follower, please, I invite you to quote one post on www.MinerBumping.com that encourages Agents to come and harass you here.
|

Robert De'Arneth
178
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:14:00 -
[487] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Anslo wrote:
What is wrong with miners wanting to use their tools to mine and mind their own business and their own corp/friends?
Nothing at all. Whats wrong with someone blowing up said miner because he was stupid and fitted no tank or bumping him to extort a ransom?
Nothing at all Sir, when my ship leaves the dock it is no longer my ship.
You have not lived until you have been Wated by Jim!!-á-á |

Ghazu
235
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:14:00 -
[488] - Quote
Why not just orbit to counter ganks, and bumpers can get bumped too |

Trollwoman
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:15:00 -
[489] - Quote
I was bumped by a miner recently.
He was a meanie, |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:15:00 -
[490] - Quote
Anslo wrote:The credibility that I did not have to rely on the "go back to [insert game here]" mentality to counter an argument. I offered an alternative game where a player would not be burdened by unnecessary interaction, such as being blown up, or being bumped, or even being talked to.
Anslo wrote:Also post with your main. I can't, but thanks for playing.
Nice to see you doing it now, did your little "Max Doobie" plaything get banned because you flipped out earlier? |

Ghazu
235
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:18:00 -
[491] - Quote
Hey guys guys guys let's get back to topic, I thought this thread was about the miners getting organized, that they were going to "do something" in-game for once but looks like they are just going do what worked last time. http://www.minerbumping.com/ |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:18:00 -
[492] - Quote
Ghazu wrote:Why not just orbit to counter ganks, and bumpers can get bumped too
Barges are too slow, they can be knocked off an asteroid 30km+ before they ever make 5 km back.
[quote=Kainotomiu Ronuken Let's approach this sensibly. [/quote] Sure.
Quote:We know that EVE is a sandbox. What does this mean? It means that EVE is a game where players are allowed to do whatever they like within the broadly defined mechanics created by CCP. Absolutely. Freedom to play.
Quote:More specifically, this means that if a group of players (such as the one at www.MinerBumping.com) decides to create a set of rules (or dare I say it, a Code) and enforce it, it is far from moot. In fact, it is just as valid as CCP's rules as long as we can enforce it. I like how you continue to advertise to try to goad me. It's amusing. But OK. But I and others do not and will not recognize your "code" as law. They will simply mine out of your reach and continue to do so, save for those staying put for their own principals (which in itself is commendable).
Quote:As for your claim that James is responsible for the actions of any follower, please, I invite you to quote one post on www.MinerBumping.com that encourages Agents to come and harass you here.
Here or in game, his actions and verbage to others he posts on the site shows enough of how he targets and eggs individuals on. If you cannot see that, then I'm sorry you are not capable of conversation analysis. Also, advertise moar. |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
214
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:19:00 -
[493] - Quote
Ran a routine L2 mission last night while working on Minnie standings, and there were 2 rooms PACKED with Scordite,Veld, and Omber (I was up millions of units of Scor and Omber before I bailed for the night, and hadn't hit the fields for more than 30%). Orca and two Macks, not a single peep, almost nobody in Local. Oh, and a couple nice pirate tags to add to the pile.
If you put yourself in a position to get bumped by Jimmie and his pre-pubescent buddies, you deserve it.
lrn2eve |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5389
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:19:00 -
[494] - Quote
the problem with an anchor module is that the afk miners would moan, throw tantrums, unsub and act like general babbies unless CCP made it a midslot module that used no CPU, no powergrid and did not require any fuel to be used, because god forbid they have to make difficult fitting choices
and then it'd be solely tailored for miners and useless outside of mining ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:21:00 -
[495] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:I offered an alternative game where a player would not be burdened by unnecessary interaction, such as being blown up, or being bumped, or even being talked to. While that might work elsewhere, I know well enough the community's "attitude" towards assumed "whiners." It's an intended insult saying 'Eve does not want you, get out (p.s. give me your stuff). They like Eve the game, but not the people who play it. There's no requirement for them to have to bother talking to you or others. Besides, how do you know they talk to no one at all? Do you have evidence?
Anslo wrote:I can't, but thanks for playing.
Nice to see you doing it now, did your little "Max Doobie" plaything get banned because you flipped out earlier?
Max? I do not have an alt named Max, but thanks for playing. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:23:00 -
[496] - Quote
Andski wrote:the problem with an anchor module is that the afk miners would moan, throw tantrums, unsub and act like general babbies unless CCP made it a midslot module that used no CPU, no powergrid and did not require any fuel to be used, because god forbid they have to make difficult fitting choices
and then it'd be solely tailored for miners and useless outside of mining
And here is a post I finally agree with. You're 100% CORRECT. They'd whine definitely. But there would be a module ready for them to use. As I said, if that module or in-game mechanic was available to them, I wouldn't bother arguing with them and would simply say HTFU. But for now, there isn't.
But I do agree with you on the above point. |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
214
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:23:00 -
[497] - Quote
Anslo wrote:We were simply defending our right to not have our playstyle removed because miners didnt like losing ships to their own stupidity
I see what you did there. Crying shame most posters won't. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2637
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:24:00 -
[498] - Quote
Anslo wrote:
There are "counters" to bumping, you're right...but not full mechanics. I don't know. I see your point though. I'm just jaded and bitter by the polarity of pvp vs. pve and am more pro-pve because of some pvpers mentality and attitudes towards anyone "playing it wrong." It's a game.
Most of the hate comes from the miners themselves. |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:26:00 -
[499] - Quote
Anslo wrote:While that might work elsewhere, I know well enough the community's "attitude" towards assumed "whiners." It's an intended insult saying 'Eve does not want you, get out (p.s. give me your stuff). They like Eve the game, but not the people who play it. All the more reason to find another game to play, huh? It's why I don't play COD or other shooters that may or may not feature 13-year old idiots screaming racist obscenities. |

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
277
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:28:00 -
[500] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Then why complain about their ignoring or noninteraction? It shouldn't bother you. I'm not. I'm complaining that they do not prepare themselves or respond appropriately when player interaction finds them. I know it is their right to refuse to respond appropriately but it is also my right to refuse to respect them as a result.
|

Nanatoa
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
119
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:29:00 -
[501] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Your code is not in game rules and are not from the company or in game authority. Therefore your code is moot.
The Code is not moot. It would be moot if it could not be enforced. As things stand, we have the means and the determination to enfore it. Deal with it.
(Of course, your way of 'dealing with it' is taking this out of game to the forums, in the deluded hope of Divine Intervention by CCP.) It is never too late to turn from the errors of your ways: He who repents of his sins is almost innocent.
MinerBumping.com |

baltec1
Bat Country
2638
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:30:00 -
[502] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:Anslo wrote:Your code is not in game rules and are not from the company or in game authority. Therefore your code is moot. The Code is not moot. It would be moot if it could not be enforced. As things stand, we have the means and the determination to enfore it. Deal with it. (Of course, your way of 'dealing with it' is taking this out of game to the forums, in the deluded hope of Divine Intervention by CCP.)
It worked before |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:37:00 -
[503] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Disgusting miner filth are not "minding their own business", they sell their rocks or manufacture with them. That is not minding their own business. That is directly influencing the market and availability of everything. Funny how that same "scum" helps supply you with your ships and equipment..
Some Rando wrote:All the more reason to find another game to play, huh? It's why I don't play COD or other shooters that may or may not feature 13-year old idiots screaming racist obscenities. No. They shouldn't have to leave because of some player with a vendetta against another person's gameplay. Also lol@COD
Riot Girl wrote:Anslo wrote:I'm not. I'm complaining that they do not prepare themselves or respond appropriately when player interaction finds them. I know it is their right to refuse to respond appropriately but it is also my right to refuse to respect them as a result. You're right. In terms of ganks, they have ways to respond. But the methods for one to respond to bumping really aren't there in any effective means. But very well, that's your right, stated respectfully, and I'll respect that. \o/ [quote=Nanatoa]The Code is not moot. It would be moot if it could not be enforced. As things stand, we have the means and the determination to enfore it. Deal with it. (Of course, your way of 'dealing with it' is taking this out of game to the forums, in the deluded hope of Divine Intervention by CCP.)
Except it is moot to 99.9% of the rest of the cluster, as it cannot be enforced there. In which case, it is moot to everyone as you are not a major enforcement entity, just a few people ruining someone else's day with delusions of grandiose faux dominance. "Deal with it."
And as stated above, it did work before. I'm not asking for bumping to be an exploit, I'm asking for miners to have something to counter it while at the same time making them open to another form of attack. |

Robert De'Arneth
178
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:37:00 -
[504] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:Anslo wrote:Your code is not in game rules and are not from the company or in game authority. Therefore your code is moot. The Code is not moot. It would be moot if it could not be enforced. As things stand, we have the means and the determination to enfore it. Deal with it. (Of course, your way of 'dealing with it' is taking this out of game to the forums, in the deluded hope of Divine Intervention by CCP.)
LOL, you have no way to enforce it all. You might find some idiots who will pay you, but do not kid yourself James, you have no real way to enforce it. Unless you mean people laughing at you as away to enforce it. Your ego is getting pretty big James.  You have not lived until you have been Wated by Jim!!-á-á |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
913
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:38:00 -
[505] - Quote
Watch as CCP drastically increase the mass of mining barges so they are impossible to bump. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5389
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:38:00 -
[506] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Your code is not in game rules and are not from the company or in game authority. Therefore your code is moot.
And what is "in-game authority?" Authority implies having the means to enforce a code, the code is "pay for the right to mine here and you won't be bumped." It's basic emergent gameplay. ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5389
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:38:00 -
[507] - Quote
Robert De'Arneth wrote:LOL, you have no way to enforce it all. You might find some idiots who will pay you, but do not kid yourself James, you have no real way to enforce it. Unless you mean people laughing at you as away to enforce it. Your ego is getting pretty big James. 
They do have a real way to enforce it, hence all the miners whining about the bumping. ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Dasola
Rookie Empire Citizens Rookie Empire
73
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:40:00 -
[508] - Quote
if bumping is all he does to miner, thats small hassle, set your mining ship to orbit asteroid your not mining Get bumped and ship will automaticly return to mining range.
Or better yet, dont mine in system this person regularly visits. Theres plenty of highsec systems to mine in. I should know, my alts mine some of them time to time. [Insert something funny or smart here] |

baltec1
Bat Country
2638
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:41:00 -
[509] - Quote
Anslo wrote:
And as stated above, it did work before. I'm not asking for bumping to be an exploit, I'm asking for miners to have something to counter it while at the same time making them open to another form of attack.
And just like before there are a lot of ways to counter it already. Miners didn't need the extra EHP and they sure as hell dont need a new anti bump module. |

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
277
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 15:41:00 -
[510] - Quote
Anslo wrote:I'm asking for miners to have something to counter it while at the same time making them open to another form of attack. They do have something to counter it with. They have a brain and all they need to do is to learn to use it in a befitting manner.
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |