Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 .. 23 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
462
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:16:00 -
[541] - Quote
Anslo wrote:baltec1 wrote:But there are ways to defend against it. And as I said...I don't believe they are effective means. Effective would be a module or some such, not a duct tape "orbit" method (which doesn't work) or web method (which also doesn't work). Also just telling them to goto a different system may work, or they might just be followed. Either way, they're displaced.
So to summarise, there are mechanics that allow you to mitigate the issue, but there are trade-offs - they're not 100% effective, you have to move, whatever.
Sounds perfect to me.
If you had a counter which was 100% effective every single time and which did not require you to make a choice as to whether you are willing to make some kind of trade off (a la the less yield for more tank choice that disgusting miner filth refused to ever make) then it becomes by definition stupidly unbalanced.
|

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
479
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:19:00 -
[542] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:Sure. But how would you feel if a bunch of players demanded that CCP banned your account whenever you enjoyed the game?
Meh. Wouldn't phase me. Collect some tears and move on.
TheGunslinger42 wrote:So to summarise, there are mechanics that allow you to mitigate the issue, but there are trade-offs - they're not 100% effective, you have to move, whatever.
Sounds perfect to me.
If you had a counter which was 100% effective every single time and which did not require you to make a choice as to whether you are willing to make some kind of trade off (a la the less yield for more tank choice that disgusting miner filth refused to ever make) then it becomes by definition stupidly unbalanced.
Indeed. That's why (if you read my previous posts instead of trolling me as an agent) I suggested an anchor that, while keeps them from being bumped, prevents them from moving for 5 minutes give or take, opening them to a gank unless they're tanked properly. Even if they are tanked properly, they can still be ganked with the right fleet. Tornado alphas are not something to be denied their kill.
|

baltec1
Bat Country
2638
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:20:00 -
[543] - Quote
Anslo wrote:baltec1 wrote:But there are ways to defend against it. And as I said...I don't believe they are effective means. Effective would be a module or some such, not a duct tape "orbit" method (which doesn't work) or web method (which also doesn't work). Also just telling them to goto a different system may work, or they might just be followed. Either way, they're displaced.
Orbiting and webs do work.
You really have to answer why it is that battleships and carriers can manage to counter bumping while miners in a cruiser sized ship cannot manage it. |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
1611
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:20:00 -
[544] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Alpheias wrote:Sure. But how would you feel if a bunch of players demanded that CCP banned your account whenever you enjoyed the game? Meh. Wouldn't phase me. Collect some tears and move on.
Good to know we agree on something then.
I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
462
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:21:00 -
[545] - Quote
Anslo wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:There is a 100% effective mechanic in place. Simply right click the Agents name and select "Give Money". Enter the license fee of 10 million isk and bobs your uncle. Or not. They should not have to pay you to play. They pay CCP. As I tell all miners, never pay an extortionist from the bumper group. That's not a mechanic, it's a scam.
They don't have to pay the New Order, but they do have to live with the consequences of the choices they make. If you do not follow the New Order you must face the consequences. |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
462
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:24:00 -
[546] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Alpheias wrote:Sure. But how would you feel if a bunch of players demanded that CCP banned your account whenever you enjoyed the game? Meh. Wouldn't phase me. Collect some tears and move on. TheGunslinger42 wrote:So to summarise, there are mechanics that allow you to mitigate the issue, but there are trade-offs - they're not 100% effective, you have to move, whatever.
Sounds perfect to me.
If you had a counter which was 100% effective every single time and which did not require you to make a choice as to whether you are willing to make some kind of trade off (a la the less yield for more tank choice that disgusting miner filth refused to ever make) then it becomes by definition stupidly unbalanced.
Indeed. That's why (if you read my previous posts instead of trolling me as an agent) I suggested an anchor that, while keeps them from being bumped, prevents them from moving for 5 minutes give or take, opening them to a gank unless they're tanked properly. Even if they are tanked properly, they can still be ganked with the right fleet. Tornado alphas are not something to be denied their kill.
Except they are already vulnerable to ganking, and miners already spend the vast majority of their time not moving, therefor your suggestion gives them a massive benefit without introducing any kind of drawback.
A more realistic scenario would be if the module reduced their yield by 50%.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5389
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:26:00 -
[547] - Quote
Robert De'Arneth wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Anslo wrote:baltec1 wrote:But there are ways to defend against it. And as I said...I don't believe they are effective means. Effective would be a module or some such, not a duct tape "orbit" method (which doesn't work) or web method (which also doesn't work). Also just telling them to goto a different system may work, or they might just be followed. Either way, they're displaced. There is a 100% effective mechanic in place. Simply right click the Agents name and select "Give Money". Enter the license fee of 10 million isk and bobs your uncle. More effective if you tell said agent to go f themselves, since it has proven they have no way to enforce this.  Also not a bad idea to type to said agent, LMAO you idiot. That will really make the agent upset. I find with most children, if you laugh at them they get real mad. They'll laugh and bump you again. ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
479
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:28:00 -
[548] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Orbiting and webs do work.
You really have to answer why it is that battleships and carriers can manage to counter bumping while miners in a cruiser sized ship cannot manage it.
Carriers and battleships are...rather much larger than a barge. I've been bumped while in my carrier and the movement was easily offset because (1) I'm a ******* giant carrier and (2) I had fleets to web me to a slowdown/safety.
I've watched the orbiting "solution" and the reason it doesn't work is because a single fleet stabber speed fit can bump off a miner faster than the barge can maneuver back to the asteroid. For every 5km the miner gains, the bumper bumpers him back another 8km give or take. And that's just one bumper.
Alpheias wrote:Good to know we agree on something then. Cheers 
TheGunslinger42 wrote:They don't have to pay the New Order, but they do have to live with the consequences of the choices they make. If you do not follow the New Order you must face the consequences. And they should be able to counter the bumper extortionists and have potential to collect your tears as well. It's a two way street :)
TheGunslinger42 wrote: Except they are already vulnerable to ganking, and miners already spend the vast majority of their time not moving, therefor your suggestion gives them a massive benefit without introducing any kind of drawback.
Not as vulnerable to ganking. Orbiting a roid while being ganked and tanked gives you a good chance to not be popped before concord shows up. Now if they were sit dead still while have 8 sets of 1400s pointed at them. Well then....
Quote:A more realistic scenario would be if the module reduced their yield by 50%. "Fair and Balanced." In case you can't spot sarcasm, that was sarcasm. That's stupidly unbalanced. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Holistic Materials Research Council
2180
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:28:00 -
[549] - Quote
There are effective counters to bumping, simply orbiting in a mackinaw or retriever is not one of them, if however you are orbiting in an AB skiff you are extremely hard to bump, won't stop us trying but 90% of the time we fail.
Those miners who fail to adapt are destined to be bumped, those who do adapt will not be bumped as often because we go for the low hanging can't be arsed miners first.
The argument that miners are the ones who produce the minerals for industry while a valid one is also a pointless one, there are many more pilots that can fly mining vessels than pilots who actually do. If the "I wanna mine all day and not be bumped" miners all quit mining it would indeed cause a price rise and shortage in ships and modules, then we would see some of the pilots who can fly mining ships, but don't because it's a poor return on time, come out of the woodwork and start mining again because it is economically viable to do so and it is in their interests to do so to produce ships.
Some of the miners that have purchased mining permits merely see it as a business cost not extortion, they have done the math and figure a 10 million isk permit is a worthwhile investment to be allowed to mine in peace and have a greater market share than those who don't have a permit. We like these guys, they accept that people can interrupt their game play and have taken steps to minimize interference, in short they have adapted and are in a better position than those who have not. Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum -á-á-á ---CCP can't patch stupid--- |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
463
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:31:00 -
[550] - Quote
Your definition of "stupidly unbalanced" seems to be anything which does not give you a huge advantage without any kind of drawback.
Follow the New Order and all this can be put behind us.
|

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
479
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:35:00 -
[551] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:There are effective counters to bumping, simply orbiting in a mackinaw or retriever is not one of them, if however you are orbiting in an AB skiff you are extremely hard to bump, won't stop us trying but 90% of the time we fail. I don't like them having their profits cut into by asshattery, but you're right on this point.
Quote: If the "I wanna mine all day and not be bumped" miners all quit mining it would indeed cause a price rise and shortage in ships and modules, then we would see some of the pilots who can fly mining ships, but don't because it's a poor return on time, come out of the woodwork and start mining again because it is economically viable to do so and it is in their interests to do so to produce ships. Do you have evidence for this? Why would they give up their original income source for mining? Why would mining suddenly be more profitable than say L4's or L5's, market games or pure industry? You need to come up with some facts before stating these assumptions.
Quote:Some of the miners that have purchased mining permits merely see it as a business cost not extortion, they have done the math and figure a 10 million isk permit is a worthwhile investment to be allowed to mine in peace and have a greater market share than those who don't have a permit. To me it's not about the money, it's the action. I don't like the idea of people kotowing to extortionists. 300 comes to mind, when Xerxes demanded a jar of water and dirt from the Spartans. It cost really nothing, but the action and symbolism behind it was down right insulting to the Spartans.
Quote:We like these guys, they accept that people can interrupt their game play and have taken steps to minimize interference, in short they have adapted and are in a better position than those who have not. If they want to pay, it's their choice sure. But for those who do not and who would rather resist you well...I have far more respect for them. |

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
277
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:38:00 -
[552] - Quote
Circumstances where it is okay to petition for CCP to alter game mechanics: When it becomes impossible for any single player to play the game due to changes in, or abuse of gameplay mechanics.
Circumstances where it is not okay to petition for CCP to alter game mechanics: When it becomes inconvenient for any single player to play the game due to changes in, or abuse of gameplay mechanics.
|

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
463
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:38:00 -
[553] - Quote
Anslo wrote:If they want to pay, it's their choice sure. But for those who do not and who would rather resist you well...I have far more respect for them.
Except you're not really resisting the Order, you're just begging CCP to introduce mechanics that would artificially protect you. If you actually resist, without whining to mommy and daddy devs to simply fix it for you, that'd be admirable. However you would still lose, as the New Order is invincible.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5391
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:40:00 -
[554] - Quote
yeah I remember that scene in 300 where King Leonidas whined to the devs about the Persians unfairly extorting him and griefing him ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Nanatoa
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
122
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:41:00 -
[555] - Quote
Andski wrote:yeah I remember that scene in 300 where King Leonidas whined to the devs about the Persians unfairly extorting him and griefing him
THIS IS PETITIOOON! It is never too late to turn from the errors of your ways: He who repents of his sins is almost innocent.
MinerBumping.com |

baltec1
Bat Country
2638
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:42:00 -
[556] - Quote
Anslo wrote:baltec1 wrote:Orbiting and webs do work.
You really have to answer why it is that battleships and carriers can manage to counter bumping while miners in a cruiser sized ship cannot manage it. Carriers and battleships are...rather much larger than a barge. I've been bumped while in my carrier and the movement was easily offset because (1) I'm a ******* giant carrier and (2) I had fleets to web me to a slowdown/safety. I've watched the orbiting "solution" and the reason it doesn't work is because a single fleet stabber speed fit can bump off a miner faster than the barge can maneuver back to the asteroid. For every 5km the miner gains, the bumper bumpers him back another 8km give or take. And that's just one bumper.
Yet when they try this on my battleship they miss...
The reason why it is so effective on miners is because of the same reason ganking them was so easy. They take zero steps to protect themselves. |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
463
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:42:00 -
[557] - Quote
Andski wrote:yeah I remember that scene in 300 where King Leonidas whined to the devs about the Persians unfairly extorting him and griefing him
"Dear god, Leonidas here, Persians are unfairly trying to force me to play the way they want. Please add some kind of anti-persian animal to real life so I can live in peace" |

Jonah Gravenstein
Holistic Materials Research Council
2180
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:44:00 -
[558] - Quote
Anslo wrote: Do you have evidence for this? Why would they give up their original income source for mining? Why would mining suddenly be more profitable than say L4's or L5's, market games or pure industry? You need to come up with some facts before stating these assumptions.
Evidence is thus, without miners there is no industry, without industry we are left with current stockpiles and noob ships, ergo people who can mine will mine even if it is only to produce ships for their own use. Many players have alt accounts that are currently unsubbed (probably due to the incarna debacle), it is by no means impossible to multibox a l4 mission runner and a miner, an industrialist and a miner or a trader and a miner, so there would be no need to give up any income source if you desired to do your own production and mining. Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum -á-á-á ---CCP can't patch stupid--- |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
479
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:45:00 -
[559] - Quote
Andski wrote:yeah I remember that scene in 300 where King Leonidas whined to the devs about the Persians unfairly extorting him and griefing him Nice twist. But really, Leonidas was free to kick the Persian's arse without getting Concordokkened, with all of them in the same corp, same place, and ready to go. We need to give miners the same 'kick' ability (THIS IS VELDSPAR!)
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Except you're not really resisting the Order, you're just begging CCP to introduce mechanics that would artificially protect you. If you actually resist, without whining to mommy and daddy devs to simply fix it for you, that'd be admirable. However you would still lose, as the New Order is invincible.
I don't really see my discussing the issue as "begging," but I suppose everyone has a definition. And you even said it yourself, your extortionists are "invincible," so why should that not be addressed in game mechanics?
baltec1 wrote:Yet when they try this on my battleship they miss...
The reason why it is so effective on miners is because of the same reason ganking them was so easy. They take zero steps to protect themselves. Dude, the mass of a battleship/carrier is not the same situation as a mining barge. Save for the skiff idea, try orbiting a roid in another barge/exhumer, and mine. Then try to get yourself bumped and see if the orbit mechanic fully works as you say. I tried. It didn't. Same with the web idea, just bump the webber out of range.
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:45:00 -
[560] - Quote
Andski wrote:yeah I remember that scene in 300 where King Leonidas whined to the devs about the Persians unfairly extorting him and griefing him Hey stop it. It's good that miners have a positive self image, and you're actively ruining that.
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:47:00 -
[561] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Andski wrote:yeah I remember that scene in 300 where King Leonidas whined to the devs about the Persians unfairly extorting him and griefing him Nice twist. But really, Leonidas was free to kick the Persian's arse without getting Concordokkened, with all of them in the same corp, same place, and ready to go. We need to give miners the same 'kick' ability  (THIS IS VELDSPAR!) I don't know if you remember, but the Spartans at Thermopylae actually all died. That seems pretty similar to CONCORD to me.
|

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
464
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:48:00 -
[562] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Nice twist. But really, Leonidas was free to kick the Persian's arse without getting Concordokkened, with all of them in the same corp, same place, and ready to go. We need to give miners the same 'kick' ability  (THIS IS VELDSPAR!)
So again this is a case of "there is yet another mechanic that lets me counter them, but I don't want to deal with the consequences or effort of that mechanic, a bloo bloo"
|

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
479
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:49:00 -
[563] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:I don't know if you remember, but the Spartans at Thermopylae actually all died. That seems pretty similar to CONCORD to me.
Yet they came back and continued to dominate afterwards.
Quote:So again this is a case of "there is yet another mechanic that lets me counter them, but I don't want to deal with the consequences or effort of that mechanic, a bloo bloo"
No, I'm pointing out that, as you said you are so "invincible," then there should be an anchoring mechanic to balance out your invincibility that has balanced draw backs. 
Riot Girl wrote:Anslo wrote:We need to give miners the same 'kick' ability  (THIS IS VELDSPAR!) And suddenly war decs were invented. If all the bumpers were in one corp, then yes, this really wouldn't be an issue worth of a thread of the miners tears. |

Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
277
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:49:00 -
[564] - Quote
Anslo wrote:We need to give miners the same 'kick' ability  (THIS IS VELDSPAR!) And suddenly war decs were invented. |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
464
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:50:00 -
[565] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Anslo wrote:Andski wrote:yeah I remember that scene in 300 where King Leonidas whined to the devs about the Persians unfairly extorting him and griefing him Nice twist. But really, Leonidas was free to kick the Persian's arse without getting Concordokkened, with all of them in the same corp, same place, and ready to go. We need to give miners the same 'kick' ability  (THIS IS VELDSPAR!) I don't know if you remember, but the Spartans at Thermopylae actually all died. That seems pretty similar to CONCORD to me. Yet they came back and continued to dominate afterwards.
Unfortunately, no, the spartans did not come back from the dead. Funnily enough though, that does happen in EVE
So um what was your point again |

baltec1
Bat Country
2638
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:51:00 -
[566] - Quote
Anslo wrote: Dude, the mass of a battleship/carrier is not the same situation as a mining barge. Save for the skiff idea, try orbiting a roid in another barge/exhumer, and mine. Then try to get yourself bumped and see if the orbit mechanic fully works as you say. I tried. It didn't. Same with the web idea, just bump the webber out of range.
When the bumping ship is a nano phoon mass means very little. Mass also means squat if they miss you.
As for the webber. Use a frigate and have it orbit the barge? |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
479
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:51:00 -
[567] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Unfortunately, no, the spartans did not come back from the dead. Funnily enough though, that does happen in EVE. So um what was your point again If you read history, you'd know that the term Spartan does not only apply to the 300 who died. There were a few more laying about.
baltec1 wrote: When the bumping ship is a nano phoon mass means very little. Mass also means squat if they miss you.
As for the webber. Use a frigate and have it orbit the barge?
I thought about that and figured it might be an unbeatable method outside of some kind of gank. I need to test it though to be sure, but that could at least be one decent counter. I'll get back to you though! |

Yuri Wayfare
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
5
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:54:00 -
[568] - Quote
Anslo wrote:To me it's not about the money, it's the action. I don't like the idea of people kotowing to extortionists. 300 comes to mind, when Xerxes demanded a jar of water and dirt from the Spartans. It cost really nothing, but the action and symbolism behind it was down right insulting to the Spartans.
Of course, the Spartans then went on to slaughter Xerxes' army in fantastically stylized slo-mo fashion while wearing capes and speedos. You don't need to let yourself be extorted when you're a bloodthirsty madman in a cape and a speedo.
Here's some possible actions you sorry lot might take to oppose the New Order:
Action: Roll up suicide gank alts and blow up the Agents of the New Order. Cost: Time, ISK, effort.
Action: Hire suicide gankers to blow up the Agents of the New Order. Cost: ISK.
Action: Train fpr PVP, ship up and wardec the New Order's corps. Cost: Time, ISK, effort.
Action: Hire mercenaries to wardec the New Order's corps. Cost: ISK.
Action: Mine in pairs of plated battleships webbing each other. Cost: Yield, effort.
Action: Pay the 10mil mining fee. Cost: Your pride and 10mil ISK.
Action: Whine to CCP and ask for a special mod to help you. Cost: Getting laughed at by all the rest of EVE, developer time that could be spent fixing real problems, introducing a hilariously exploitable new mod to EVE, the New Order declaring a shift of focus to blockading Jita 4-4 with a wall of anchored mining barges and demanding a 10mil ISK fee from any freighter pilot wishing to pass through.
Nothing comes for free. "Suddenly, trash pickers! HUNDREDS of winos going through your recyclables." -Piugattuk |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
479
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 16:57:00 -
[569] - Quote
Yuri Wayfare wrote: Action: Whine to CCP and ask for a special mod to help you. Cost: Getting laughed at by all the rest of EVE, developer time that could be spent fixing real problems, introducing a hilariously exploitable new mod to EVE, the New Order declaring a shift of focus to blockading Jita 4-4 with a wall of anchored mining barges and demanding a 10mil ISK fee from any freighter pilot wishing to pass through.
Nothing comes for free.
Oh god I lol'd. |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
21
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 17:01:00 -
[570] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:I don't know if you remember, but the Spartans at Thermopylae actually all died. That seems pretty similar to CONCORD to me. Yet they came back and continued to dominate afterwards. This is the equivalent of the miner coming back in his PVP ship.
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 .. 23 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |