Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 108 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 25 post(s) |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
627
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 07:50:00 -
[1981] - Quote
LuisWu wrote:Asmodai Xodai wrote:... I think that would be far more effective than trying to reason with these people... Its imposible to reason with this people they live in a world where you can eliminate a 50% cap bonus and solve it with a 10% reduction in cap use, also a world where a cap warfare ship that can-¦t fit 7 x meta 4 large neut + 2 meta 4 large cap booster + some (again) meta 4 buffer tank without 2 fitting modules its "a fun one" ship to fly, but its ok , because: CCP Rise wrote:amarr ship are in the best place it can be for Odyssey. Does the Guardian fit a full rack large reps, plate, prop., etc without fitting mods? No ship except for the few remaining broken ones, are (or should be) able to max performance without sacrifice in the form of fitting mods.
The whole idea, one that Amarr has in general lived with for years, is that to squeeze those last delicious drops out of the lemon one has to accept hand cramps .. the only problem in that respect is that there are some hulls (predominantly Minmatar) that require too little in the way of sacrifice to max performance, those are the ones you should be howling at. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
230
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 07:52:00 -
[1982] - Quote
LuisWu wrote:Asmodai Xodai wrote:... I think that would be far more effective than trying to reason with these people... Its imposible to reason with this people they live in a world where you can eliminate a 50% cap bonus and solve it with a 10% reduction in cap use, also a world where a cap warfare ship that can-¦t fit 7 x meta 4 large neut + 2 meta 4 large cap booster + some (again) meta 4 buffer tank without 2 fitting modules its "a fun one" ship to fly, but its ok , because: CCP Rise wrote:amarr ship are in the best place it can be for Odyssey. Not empty space quoting, but oh so true. There is nothing wrong with the 'design' of the new Geddon, it's not what it used to be but it's interesting & different and does fit the niche amarr designs. But..... The stats on it for PG..... And the stats on the lasers...... Just don't work. |

LuisWu
I hope you were insured
17
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 08:30:00 -
[1983] - Quote
Veshta Yoshida wrote:LuisWu wrote:Asmodai Xodai wrote:... I think that would be far more effective than trying to reason with these people... Its imposible to reason with this people they live in a world where you can eliminate a 50% cap bonus and solve it with a 10% reduction in cap use, also a world where a cap warfare ship that can-¦t fit 7 x meta 4 large neut + 2 meta 4 large cap booster + some (again) meta 4 buffer tank without 2 fitting modules its "a fun one" ship to fly, but its ok , because: CCP Rise wrote:amarr ship are in the best place it can be for Odyssey. Does the Guardian fit a full rack large reps, plate, prop., etc without fitting mods? No ship except for the few remaining broken ones, are (or should be) able to max performance without sacrifice in the form of fitting mods. The whole idea, one that Amarr has in general lived with for years, is that to squeeze those last delicious drops out of the lemon one has to accept hand cramps .. the only problem in that respect is that there are some hulls (predominantly Minmatar) that require too little in the way of sacrifice to max performance, those are the ones you should be howling at.
I agree, few ships can use the dream-fit without going faction or meta4 (and its part of the game), but something its wrong when the actual Armageddon its a more effective neuting platform than the propossed one, right now you can fit a full rack of large neuts (8, one more than the new one) + 2 cap booters + microwarp + 142K hep with only 1 L ACC , of course you dont have the extra 13 km (wich is a good bonus, but 25,2 km its not bad) but you have a 15% more neut power and due the long cycle of large neuts you are more effective against enemy cap boosters, but hey i guess this ship its not a "fun one"
|

LuisWu
I hope you were insured
17
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 11:15:00 -
[1984] - Quote
fail, sorry |

Apostrof Ahashion
Viziam Amarr Empire
107
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 11:30:00 -
[1985] - Quote
I really dont get it why you dont buff capacitors on Amarr gunships and fix the problem with lasers.
It is obvious that Amarr dont have any significant cap advantage overall compared to the hulls of other races. The 10% cap reduction on lasers just does not cut it.
All things considered, especially that every other race got capacitor bonuses even on missile ships, Hyperion lost two turrets and its capacitor remained the same, Megathron got some cap to compensate for bonus change from damage to rof, Dominix lost its hybrids and became a dedicated drone boat and still got a cap buff, even Scorpion got a buff and now has only 0.04 less cap regen than the Abaddon. |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling
178
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 12:23:00 -
[1986] - Quote
Gargantoi wrote: we dont want abaddon to be a nightmare but i do get your point and i would recomand to ccp to do this ...7-4-8 combo with 6 guns 1 utility 10% bonus to dmg 4% to resist remove 1% resist / lvl add 1 more low slot improve its dmg ...if not hyperion will take a **** on it not to mention that when fighting vs armored tanked ships em is the highest resist ..so dps is already killed
I like this, along a similar vein to what a lot of have been suggesting :) . |

Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
109
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 12:28:00 -
[1987] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:new Geddon, ... does fit the niche amarr designs. What?........ |

Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
109
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 12:41:00 -
[1988] - Quote
Naso Aya wrote:Provence Tristram wrote:Regolis wrote:Well .. if it was meant to be a larger Prophecy it should have used the Abaddon hull .. but I don't want to get into that argument again.
I don't understand why they don't just introduce it as a T1 Khanid hull using the Abaddon and be done with it.
Omen -> Armageddon Prophecy -> Abaddon
I mean doesn't the Prophecy have the resist bonus with the drone bonus?
Agreed. The Armageddon is the clear successor to the Omen. It's nonsense to turn it into this drone hive. And with the Abaddon obviously going up from a Maller, if we HAVE to have a drone boat, that leaves the Apoc. Prophecy -> Abaddon. Also, there's just not enough space for drones in Apoc. |

Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
109
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 12:51:00 -
[1989] - Quote
Asmodai Xodai wrote:What's wrong with simply putting amarr down and trying out other races? It's what I'm doing now (just bought two caldari ships, and will be training for minmatar to try them as well). You know, some playing this game for specific reasons.
Quote:Vote with your choices. Don't wed yourself to amarr, even if you thought they were the coolest. I was born amarr too, but if the devs are hell-bent on punishing them, I'm not a sucker for punishment.
Vote with your feet. Leave amarr in droves. That way the devs can either accept a 3 race game, or do something about it. I think that would be far more effective than trying to reason with these people. I'd rather just stop playing (again, this time for a reason, and unlikely to come back), than see myself chewing this synthetic fecalias and keep a happy face. |

Ruze
Next Stage Initiative Trans-Stellar Industries
129
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 12:57:00 -
[1990] - Quote
Tonto Auri wrote: I'd rather just stop playing (again, this time for a reason, and unlikely to come back), than see myself chewing this synthetic fecalias and keep a happy face.
There's a rule that you don't do if you want your argument to be taken seriously. Don't threaten to quit. It seems the vast majority who threaten it never do, and since it's become such a cliche argument, it looks cheap.
It's like most people and suicide. Nothing but a call for help and attention. You may be completely legitimate and serious, but as an outside observer I neither believe you nor care, and I doubt CCP cares either.
CCP didn't buck after Incarna because people threatened to quit. They buckled because people quit. The one's who threatened were just making noise.
Quitting over losing a ship class? Meh, whatever floats your boat. I enjoy EvE more than just three ships, personally.
If you're driven to threaten others with harm or violence because of what they do in game, you can't separate fantasy from reality.-á That 'griefer/thief' is probably more sane than you are.-á How screwed up is that? |
|

raawe
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 12:59:00 -
[1991] - Quote
OMG no, leave geddon alone, don't make a prophecy out of it, we all saw how that turned out. Amarr ships need to be revorked again cuz with proposed changes you can just crosstrain to something else. Such a bad changes on geddon... If you have no other idea then to c/p what's already out there and make it super sized make a pool or something i'm sure we'll come up with some interesting ideas. My proposed changes: laser boat, rof or dmg bonus per lvl 5% (lasers) and 5-7.5% cap recharge rate per lvl, something that would allow pewpew and tank. Just my 2 cents |

Avald Midular
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
28
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 13:13:00 -
[1992] - Quote
Only 20 "likes" to the OP with 97 pages of meaningful feedback and fitting suggestions to solve the PG and cap-use problems. Still no meaningful tweaks to the changes that are obviously ill-received (yes I'm counting the Large Energy Turret thread, we'll quickly see on Sisi it makes too little a difference...great now no BS can fire for more than 3 versus 2.5 minutes and still can't even fit Tachyons let alone fire them, wonderful).
I'm still waiting for CCP's answer to mission runners who are worse off after these changes. Please post CCP's suggested Level 4 mission fit that doesn't include Scorch and 2-3 cap modules that doesn't buffer tank. We would love to test it on Sisi and laugh/cry. |

Ruze
Next Stage Initiative Trans-Stellar Industries
129
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 13:13:00 -
[1993] - Quote
A warning note to CCP, who I hope will catch this:
IF you are considering adding a new Battleship hull in the next two years, do NOT take such drastic changes with the Armageddon. I know you've got the Geddon in art right now and it's getting launchers, but let me say that you can avoid alot of this fan reaction by letting us know that our diversity is coming somewhere down the road.
If you could poll us, I have a sincere feeling that the numbers of those who can wait to get such an awesome drone boat are higher than those who feel it needs to arrive in June. Just polish off the Geddon with some basic crap and promise a balance pass later, and leave the world shaking for the future.
Please. If you're driven to threaten others with harm or violence because of what they do in game, you can't separate fantasy from reality.-á That 'griefer/thief' is probably more sane than you are.-á How screwed up is that? |

Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
109
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 13:16:00 -
[1994] - Quote
Ruze wrote:[quote=Tonto Auri]There's a rule that you don't do if you want your argument to be taken seriously. Don't threaten to quit. I'm not threatening. I'm making a statement in responce to specific offer. |

Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
109
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 13:21:00 -
[1995] - Quote
Avald Midular wrote:OP only received 20 "likes" Curious. Some thread statistics: The thread was posted over two weeks ago. (18 days to be precise) The thread has seen roughly 100 posts a day(!) There's over 40(!) participants, who have left 10 or more messages, out of ~400 authors in total. The average length of the message in thread is more than 1000 characters (even including (excluding) massive overquoting, this is rather big number!) Yet, the OP only received, like... all of 20 "likes". Out of 400 posters? Not counting viewers? How's that for statistics? |

LuisWu
I hope you were insured
20
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 14:19:00 -
[1996] - Quote
He must be grateful because there isn't a dislike button.
On a more serius note if he doesn-¦t care about 98 pages of feedback why is he going to care about the "likes" |

Kenshi Hanshin
Karl XII's Dragoner Apocalypse Now.
39
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 14:41:00 -
[1997] - Quote
LuisWu wrote:He must be grateful because there isn't a dislike button.
On a more serius note if he doesn-¦t care about 98 pages of feedback why is he going to care about the "likes" My thoughts exactly and I see a certain individual had the nerve to redact my reasonable request.
Well, CCP congrats, I now have full right and legitimate reasons under US law to sue you for your failed Arbitration! Actually I can get the feds to do it for me... I have also reported CCP under Bureau of Better Business for fraudulent behavior using your own blogs and words for evidence. Enjoy! __________________________
Refer your dev to read the last 90+ pages of un-approving feedback. |

Cy4nid3
Nordgoetter Test Alliance Please Ignore
6
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 14:48:00 -
[1998] - Quote
Is there a chance to get amarr Skill points resetted ? Could need Winmatar BS V and projectile instead of lazors after these changes  |

Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
111
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 14:53:00 -
[1999] - Quote
Cy4nid3 wrote:Is there a chance to get amarr Skill points resetted ? Could need Winmatar BS V and projectile instead of lazors after these changes  Would call for all BS skillpoints reimbursement. Many players would want to move away from crap CCP putting them into. |

Asmodai Xodai
Legio Geminatus Gentlemen's Agreement
64
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 15:33:00 -
[2000] - Quote
Tonto Auri wrote: I'd rather just stop playing (again, this time for a reason, and unlikely to come back), than see myself chewing this synthetic fecalias and keep a happy face.
I consider this just as much 'voting with your feet' as what I proposed - changing races.
Would hate to see you leave bro, but I commend you for taking a stand and not putting up with the BS. |
|

LuisWu
I hope you were insured
22
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 15:36:00 -
[2001] - Quote
Maybe I am wrong, but i think you will recieve the reimbursement of your skillpoints right after me being married with Scarlett Johansson , but before we reach the worldwide peace.
Until then we have around 2 months of skill points between guns and ship stuck in the amarr line. |

Regolis
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
48
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 16:43:00 -
[2002] - Quote
The thing that doesn't make sense to me is why a race would build a class of ships that couldn't sustain themselves. The fiction makes it sound like Amarr have better energy technology than the other races. IE they didn't bother making lasers more efficient since their power generation and capacity was better than the others.
I don't understand why this is such a big argument with the devs. These ships are unsustainable with their guns alone. These weapon systems have been like this since before the introduction of ship rigging. The only change from then is that we now can atleast put recharger rigs on the ship to help with the cap issues.
The Amarr philosophy is brick with guns. Amarr isn't highly mobile. They don't have alot of ECM/ECCM. They never were supposed to have much variation in damage type. So instead of having any clear advantage for all the disadvantages Amarr has. We get penalized for even attempting to use our weaponry.
IMO the devs don't really want to make the races too disparate. They want them to be homogenized since it's easier to balance them that way. I'm not sure what sacred cow they are protecting about not balancing Amarr ships or weapons.
It's pretty obvious that something is significantly wrong with the Amarr ships and their weapons. Sticking a bandaid over the obvious problems aren't going to make them go away. They didn't fix anything 5 years ago when you decided that base 60% armor resist was too much for lasers to deal with and nothing has changed since then for lasers.
TLDR: The devs either need to put up or shut up. Show use the data that says lasers will be so severely overpowered if we can actually use them like other races can use their weapons. |

Provence Tristram
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
60
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 16:55:00 -
[2003] - Quote
Ruze wrote:A warning note to CCP, who I hope will catch this:
IF you are considering adding a new Battleship hull in the next two years, do NOT take such drastic changes with the Armageddon. I know you've got the Geddon in art right now and it's getting launchers, but let me say that you can avoid alot of this fan reaction by letting us know that our diversity is coming somewhere down the road.
If you could poll us, I have a sincere feeling that the numbers of those who can wait to get such an awesome drone boat are higher than those who feel it needs to arrive in June. Just polish off the Geddon with some basic crap and promise a balance pass later, and leave the world shaking for the future.
Please.
Agreed. I think a poll would definitely show that the community overall is not in favor of these sweeping changes. If the poll was even more specfic, such as 'if you primarily fly Gallente, how do you feel about changes to X; if you primarily fly Amarr how do you feel about changes to Y?' the results would be even more lopsided.
As far as the Armageddon is concerned, what I keep going back to is these niche boats that practically nobody flies. While there will always be a crowd that loves ships like the Bhaalgorn and the Scorpion (and even, to a degree, the Domi fits into this category), do they constitute the norm? Is this playstyle what most people are looking for? And the answer to that is a resolute and thundering 'no.'
At the end of the day, your average Amarr player wants to shoot things with lasers. At the end of the day, your average Gallente player wants to tear things up with fleets of drones. Why is this like this? Because that is the lore we were sold on -- that is the world that has been EVE for nearly a decade.
I do not understand the desire to turn every ship in EVE into a one-trick pony. Real-world militaries have never been like that. Real-world militaries possess ships and vehicles and planes with overlapping roles. A frigate can do much of what a destroyer can; a destroyer can do much of what a cruiser can. And different classes of destroyers and cruisers all basically do the same thing -- just with slightly different approaches; different armaments. Nations, overall, might favor a certain tactical approach -- for the U.S. during the cold war it was (and remains) aircraft carriers; for the Russians it was fleets of missile-toting battlecruisers and cruisers. And you didn't really see one trying to ape the other because each believed their approach to warfare was correct.
Such was the case with EVE. You had boats that excelled at some things, and others that excelled at other stuff. But they were all essentially linked to one another by a pan-racial identity. Amarr: big laser guns and armor tanking. Caldari: missiles and shields. Gallente: drones and a lot of armor tanking. Minmatar: projectiles and shields. People liked that status quo. They liked the diversity that came with picking a race; choosing a path to follow.
What I have failed to see metastasize throughout this entire process is the crowd of people clamouring at the gates for changes that homogenize the races. Ask your average EVEer if you think that's a good thing, and they're not going to give you a positive reply.
Perhaps the most damning quote comes from CCP Rise himself. From the OP (underline added):
Quote:I think its the best thing for the race line overall... [...]... It makes sense for Amarr to have a battleship variation that rewards players who've trained for dragoon -> arbitrator -> prophecy, and with the neut range bonus, the Armageddon should be a huge payoff.
What? And, in God's name, why? How many Amarr players out there were going Dragoon -> Arbitrator -> Prophecy and then QQing that they didn't have an Amarr battleship? Hell, that progression of ships didn't even make sense until a few months ago. Surely -- surely -- there are not great masses of people out there deeply wounded because they couldn't chase a neut-drone build all the way into BS as Amarr.
Ergo -- and I cannot emphasize this enough -- these changes are ruining a ship for the majority to please a minority that, until a few short weeks ago, did not even exist.
This is why CCP Rise needs to explain himself. This is why these changes fail. Because they simultaneously destroy a good boat and strip a race of its unique flavor. But, of course, this post will be ignored... I am sure 'for the good of the game.' |

MattTrader
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 17:19:00 -
[2004] - Quote
Regolis wrote:The thing that doesn't make sense to me is why a race would build a class of ships that couldn't sustain themselves. The fiction makes it sound like Amarr have better energy technology than the other races. IE they didn't bother making lasers more efficient since their power generation and capacity was better than the others.
I don't understand why this is such a big argument with the devs. These ships are unsustainable with their guns alone. These weapon systems have been like this since before the introduction of ship rigging. The only change from then is that we now can atleast put recharger rigs on the ship to help with the cap issues.
The Amarr philosophy is brick with guns. Amarr isn't highly mobile. They don't have alot of ECM/ECCM. They never were supposed to have much variation in damage type. So instead of having any clear advantage for all the disadvantages Amarr has. We get penalized for even attempting to use our weaponry.
IMO the devs don't really want to make the races too disparate. They want them to be homogenized since it's easier to balance them that way. I'm not sure what sacred cow they are protecting about not balancing Amarr ships or weapons.
It's pretty obvious that something is significantly wrong with the Amarr ships and their weapons. Sticking a bandaid over the obvious problems aren't going to make them go away. They didn't fix anything 5 years ago when you decided that base 60% armor resist was too much for lasers to deal with and nothing has changed since then for lasers.
TLDR: The devs either need to put up or shut up. Show use the data that says lasers will be so severely overpowered if we can actually use them like other races can use their weapons.
I couldn't have put this better myself. I agree with this 100% |

Korgan Nailo
5ER3NITY INC Apocalypse Now.
142
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 17:29:00 -
[2005] - Quote
Asmodai Xodai wrote:What's wrong with simply putting amarr down and trying out other races? It's what I'm doing now (just bought two caldari ships, and will be training for minmatar to try them as well).
Vote with your choices. Don't wed yourself to amarr, even if you thought they were the coolest. I was born amarr too, but if the devs are hell-bent on punishing them, I'm not a sucker for punishment.
Vote with your feet. Leave amarr in droves. That way the devs can either accept a 3 race game, or do something about it. I think that would be far more effective than trying to reason with these people. To me? Training.
My character is two years old, which for eve is... nothing.
I spent my first year and a half training, first with support remap, then with gunnery / spaceship remap. I've put several months worth of SP in it and then remaped again to production.
If I where to try any other race now, I would be talking about at least 3 months of training.
So why we keep writing? Just because simple things, that would not hurt other areas, could make a huge difference in others. Everybody says the focus is X or Z, but if you could improve Y a bit and not do that much problem to X or Z, why not?
For me, after spending days on the test servers and writing what I believe to be constructive feedback posts here and having no particular addressed answer from the devs, not to my posts, but to my points in particular, which are shared by several others, the answer is clear.
Next time I have a remap available, it will be back to gunner / missiles / spaceships, and I'll simply forget everything else until I have all BS 5, specialization in all 4 weapons. Perhaps this way, a year and a half from now, if I'm still playing, I can "race hop" like that. --== EvE Online Quick Reference Sheet: E-Uni Forums Link / EvE Forums Link ==-- |

Apostrof Ahashion
Viziam Amarr Empire
111
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 18:09:00 -
[2006] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote: To anyone who is very sad to see the old Armageddon go, I encourage to you consider that if left the same, it would have been even more crowded by the Abaddon as a result of the price adjustment than it already was. Again, we look forward to your feedback.
Dont know where you get your numbers. Because all market sites i checked show that in last 180 days there have been on average 56% more sales of Armageddon hull compared to the Abbadon, not the other way around. Now i dont doubt that you guys at CCP have more accurate data and i would really like to some some hard numbers from you ppl proving the statement that Armageddon hull is not used.
I want my 8 low slots&slot utility high Amarr gunship back. |

LuisWu
I hope you were insured
23
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 18:26:00 -
[2007] - Quote
The situation its even more infuriating because CCP Rise has been until almost yesterday a player, so he knows what feels a player when devs take decisions without consulting/attending players feedback that affect the ships you use everyday and you have trained for a long period.
And yet... |

Bouh Revetoile
TIPIAKS
310
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 18:26:00 -
[2008] - Quote
Apostrof Ahashion wrote:CCP Rise wrote: To anyone who is very sad to see the old Armageddon go, I encourage to you consider that if left the same, it would have been even more crowded by the Abaddon as a result of the price adjustment than it already was. Again, we look forward to your feedback.
Dont know where you get your numbers. Because all market sites i checked show that in last 180 days there have been on average 56% more sales of Armageddon hull compared to the Abbadon, not the other way around. Now i dont doubt that you guys at CCP have more accurate data and i would really like to some some hard numbers from you ppl proving the statement that Armageddon hull is not used. I want my 8 low slots&utility high Amarr gunship back. He's not saying it's not used ; he is asking what would happen if the Armageddon cost the same than the Abaddon ? |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
923
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 18:27:00 -
[2009] - Quote
LuisWu wrote:The situation its even more infuriating because CCP Rise has been until almost yesterday a player, so he knows what feels a player when devs take decisions without consulting/attending players feedback that affect the ships you use everyday and you have trained for a long period.
And yet...
i like your avatar 10/10 Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |

Apostrof Ahashion
Viziam Amarr Empire
111
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 18:31:00 -
[2010] - Quote
Also i find it extremely funny that the guy that is leading the battleship rebalance didnt flew Amarr battleship in over a year. And what he did fly was a fail fit Armageddon. The only battleship he seems to use from time to time is Tempest, you know the battleship that got over 1k armor hp and at the same time lost over 2m of mass. Magic. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 108 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |