Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 .. 93 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 20 post(s) |

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
1474
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 17:37:00 -
[1171] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Garviel Tarrant wrote:Why is this allowed?
[Stratios, Webs are token EWAR] 1600mm Reinforced Steel Plates II Damage Control II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Reactive Armor Hardener Drone Damage Amplifier II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I
Covert Ops Cloaking Device II Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Anti-Explosive Pump I
Ogre II x5
A cloaky ship with 760 dps, 3 ewar slots and 55k ehp BEFORE res shift?
Seriously? what the ****? There are lots of good suggestions in the thread that would help keep this more focused on the role as an exploration ship,that balance it's power as a pve fit whilst avoiding the more extreme PvP fits, if you have any good ideas that would assist in this balancing, I am sure that tomorrow being Monday Ccp Rise will take them into account too. There are some extreme posts spammed in the thread,but those I feel confident may be cleaned off by the morning .
Remove the ******* stupid covert ops thing from these ships and make them some other than a group of overpowered twatmobiles.
The Stratios could hold his own in a fight against ANY other pirate cruiser.. (Decimating most in fact) AND it has a cloak? I don't understand the logic behind giving a supposedly more rounded pirate ship the specialization bonus of a recon, its really weird.
BYDI recruitment closed-ish |

epicurus ataraxia
Unchained Industrial Collective Defiance Enterprises
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 17:39:00 -
[1172] - Quote
Commander A9 wrote:Sisters of EVE are an international humanitarian science-and-religion organization, according to their info panel.
I like the idea of exploration bonuses, but is there any plan to incorporate some kind of remote boosting or repair feature in some capacity? Like a bonus to repair modules or drones or support activity?
I think they are being more focused on single player mode rather than fleet,but I am really not sure, I think people are a bit scared of mission creep, but so much noise in this thread i lost touch with what real peoples opinion was on this, Something was mentioned about clouds of cloaky reppers, but not sure if that was a real person or one of the spammers. |

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
1474
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 17:55:00 -
[1173] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Commander A9 wrote:Sisters of EVE are an international humanitarian science-and-religion organization, according to their info panel.
I like the idea of exploration bonuses, but is there any plan to incorporate some kind of remote boosting or repair feature in some capacity? Like a bonus to repair modules or drones or support activity? I think they are being more focused on single player mode rather than fleet,but I am really not sure, I think people are a bit scared of mission creep, but so much noise in this thread i lost touch with what real peoples opinion was on this, Something was mentioned about clouds of cloaky reppers, but not sure if that was a real person or one of the spammers.
Why would you use a cloaky ship for missions? =/
Also there is plenty of broken PVE in this game, these ships are not going to significantly break it to be even worth talking about.
IMO, ships should be balance around pvp, and PVE should be balanced around that. But thats just me.
I'm most concerned by the addition of a high tank, high dps cloaky ship with a metric fuckton of ewar.. BYDI recruitment closed-ish |

Bouh Revetoile
TIPIAKS
369
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 18:01:00 -
[1174] - Quote
Xequecal wrote:Bouh Revetoile wrote:epicurus ataraxia wrote:So what is this then! I am commenting on the exploration ship in the exploration ship thread. Mmmm Others are commenting about combat in the exploration ship thread, this is a combat explorer .is it conceivably possible that we are both posting in the right place? You are asking for a christmas gift. The only reason you gave for the +10 virus bonus is because it's an exploration ship. Yet people already demonstrated that +5 was enough even for nullsec. So we have your wishes and questionable allegations versus proven facts. There's nothing more to say IMO. Define "enough." If you have access to T2 exploration modules it probably won't hurt you too much, as blowing 1 can in 100 instead of 1 can in 200 is an incredibly minor ISK/hour loss, even if it is double the cans blown. However, if you only have T1 modules, it's an immense nerf and makes the ship completely non-viable. 30 virus strength can actually kill a mainframe virus suppressor, 25 virus strength is completely unable to even starting from full HP. 25 VS is also completely unable to kill a system core while virus suppressed, 30 VS can. 30 VS also kills firewalls, restoration nodes, and system cores in three attacks instead of four, resulting in 33% less damage taken. You will probably lose one mainframe in three with only 25 VS, 30 VS is probably like one in ten. 25 VS means revealing a single suppressor is pretty much an automatic failure unless you find a kernel rot or attack vector to get rid of it. You are saying that you want to do high end exploration without skills to do it. And you want CCP to help you on top of that ? Come on...
That's ridiculous... |

Bouh Revetoile
TIPIAKS
369
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 18:06:00 -
[1175] - Quote
Garviel Tarrant wrote:Why is this allowed?
[Stratios, Webs are token EWAR] 1600mm Reinforced Steel Plates II Damage Control II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Reactive Armor Hardener Drone Damage Amplifier II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I
Covert Ops Cloaking Device II Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Anti-Explosive Pump I
Ogre II x5
A cloaky ship with 760 dps, 3 ewar slots and 55k ehp BEFORE res shift?
Seriously? what the ****? As I already said, you only have one more mid slot than a Navy Vexor or Ishtar. The Ishtar also have a lot more tank and firepower., and the Navy Vexor have better heavy drones, and I haven't saw you so scared when navy cruisers were rebalanced.
I guess it's the cloak thing who scare the **** out of everyone ; yet cloaky T3 exist for years and they are even less common than 100MN AB ones... |

epicurus ataraxia
Unchained Industrial Collective Defiance Enterprises
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 18:22:00 -
[1176] - Quote
Ccp rise, Tl;DR version. There is concern amongst some that the fact this can be fitted in such a way that a large amount of damage can be projected at extremely close range, and that range can be achieved by creeping up under cloak and then ripping loose. When you look at the balancing can you see if the damage is more able to be projected at PvE ranges, without removing reasonable PvP abilities? Explorers are very very excited by this ship,and now the spammer issue has been addressed, (A user implemented a determined spamming effort with multiple identities to cripple the ship for this role, and has been identified and reported for action) very very strong concencus is for + 10 virus strength, Interest in scanning is focused around core probe scanning, no one seems overly concerned with the levels you are suggesting,this depends of course on whether you are planning to introduce sites that are more difficuilt to scan down.Higher levels are more appropriate to combat scanning and expanded probe launcher so seem of less concern to the explorers. There is a desire for a further high slot on the frigate and no one seems to object much. No one much cares for laser cap bonuses and no one seems believe that they work much as a weapons system for this ships role. Some concern about an exploration ship up against sleepers and the new drone AI so possible an amendment to drone hit points or drone signature. Cargo bay is seen as a little restricted, particuarly if the cruiser is to carry a few space yurts and possibly syphons for a long duration mission.We don't know of course how big they will be and whether they are assembled in space or launched whole.
That is about it, we are all looking forward to your thoughts, and looking forward to What Rubicon brings.
|

Mr Doctor
Los Polos Hermanos. Happy Cartel
66
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 18:25:00 -
[1177] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote:I guess it's the cloak thing who scare the **** out of everyone ; yet cloaky T3 exist for years and they are even less common than 100MN AB ones... Cloaky T3s dont do 700+ DPS, not even the Prot (maxes at around 500ish with proper fit and next to no range on that damage). |

epicurus ataraxia
Unchained Industrial Collective Defiance Enterprises
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 18:26:00 -
[1178] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote:Xequecal wrote:Bouh Revetoile wrote:epicurus ataraxia wrote:So what is this then! I am commenting on the exploration ship in the exploration ship thread. Mmmm Others are commenting about combat in the exploration ship thread, this is a combat explorer .is it conceivably possible that we are both posting in the right place? You are asking for a christmas gift. The only reason you gave for the +10 virus bonus is because it's an exploration ship. Yet people already demonstrated that +5 was enough even for nullsec. So we have your wishes and questionable allegations versus proven facts. There's nothing more to say IMO. Define "enough." If you have access to T2 exploration modules it probably won't hurt you too much, as blowing 1 can in 100 instead of 1 can in 200 is an incredibly minor ISK/hour loss, even if it is double the cans blown. However, if you only have T1 modules, it's an immense nerf and makes the ship completely non-viable. 30 virus strength can actually kill a mainframe virus suppressor, 25 virus strength is completely unable to even starting from full HP. 25 VS is also completely unable to kill a system core while virus suppressed, 30 VS can. 30 VS also kills firewalls, restoration nodes, and system cores in three attacks instead of four, resulting in 33% less damage taken. You will probably lose one mainframe in three with only 25 VS, 30 VS is probably like one in ten. 25 VS means revealing a single suppressor is pretty much an automatic failure unless you find a kernel rot or attack vector to get rid of it. You are saying that you want to do high end exploration without skills to do it. And you want CCP to help you on top of that ? Come on... That's ridiculous... This user has been reported for using multiple identities to spam this thread. The accounts have posted repeatedly with the intention of giving the impression that a number of people hold a similar view.This has been passed to CCP for action.
|

Bouh Revetoile
TIPIAKS
369
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 18:31:00 -
[1179] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:very very strong concencus is for + 10 virus strength, A concencus between you and all who agree with you. All others are malign spammers.
:D You are simply epic ! |

Bouh Revetoile
TIPIAKS
369
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 18:34:00 -
[1180] - Quote
Mr Doctor wrote:Bouh Revetoile wrote:I guess it's the cloak thing who scare the **** out of everyone ; yet cloaky T3 exist for years and they are even less common than 100MN AB ones... Cloaky T3s dont do 700+ DPS, not even the Prot (maxes at around 500ish with proper fit and next to no range on that damage). Not true.
If you calculate the dps the same way people calculated it for the Stratios (overheat all guns and drones), then you have 630 dps with the Proteus.
And the Stratios don't have any more range than blasters. We are talking Ogre dps. And T3 have twice the tank of this Stratios BTW. |
|

epicurus ataraxia
Unchained Industrial Collective Defiance Enterprises
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 18:34:00 -
[1181] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote:epicurus ataraxia wrote:very very strong concencus is for + 10 virus strength, A concencus between you and all who agree with you. All others are malign spammers. :D You are simply epic !
This user has been reported for using multiple identities to spam this thread. The accounts have posted repeatedly with the intention of giving the impression that a number of people hold a similar view.This has been passed to CCP for action.
|

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
1474
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 18:37:00 -
[1182] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote:Garviel Tarrant wrote:Why is this allowed?
[Stratios, Webs are token EWAR] 1600mm Reinforced Steel Plates II Damage Control II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Reactive Armor Hardener Drone Damage Amplifier II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I
Covert Ops Cloaking Device II Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Anti-Explosive Pump I
Ogre II x5
A cloaky ship with 760 dps, 3 ewar slots and 55k ehp BEFORE res shift?
Seriously? what the ****? As I already said, you only have one more mid slot than a Navy Vexor or Ishtar. The Ishtar also have a lot more tank and firepower., and the Navy Vexor have better heavy drones, and I haven't saw you so scared when navy cruisers were rebalanced. I guess it's the cloak thing who scare the **** out of everyone ; yet cloaky T3 exist for years and they are even less common than 100MN AB ones...
Cloaky t3's are way more expensive and i'm pretty damn sure that the Stratios beats them hands down in combat capabilities.
Also "Just one more" midslot is kind of a big deal. BYDI recruitment closed-ish |

Bouh Revetoile
TIPIAKS
369
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 19:03:00 -
[1183] - Quote
There is one odd thing with the Stratios in fact : it have the same number of slots than other pirate ships, which is odd considering drone boats all have one less slots ; except for the Gila. |

Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
343
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 19:08:00 -
[1184] - Quote
Garviel Tarrant wrote:
Cloaky t3's are way more expensive and i'm pretty damn sure that the Stratios beats them hands down in combat capabilities.
Also "Just one more" midslot is kind of a big deal.
In terms of combat abilities (ignoring tank) it does better than all but the prot.
|

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
1651
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 19:26:00 -
[1185] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote:There is one odd thing with the Stratios in fact : it have the same number of slots than other pirate ships, which is odd considering drone boats all have one less slots ; except for the Gila. Yes could do with -1 slot. But traditionally the lost slot is a high slot for drone boats, at least that is what the Ishtar lost, and te Myrmidon lost, the Eos has one less high slot also. Novis Initiis is Recruting-á --á Ideas for Drone Improvement |

epicurus ataraxia
Unchained Industrial Collective Defiance Enterprises
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 19:31:00 -
[1186] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:Bouh Revetoile wrote:There is one odd thing with the Stratios in fact : it have the same number of slots than other pirate ships, which is odd considering drone boats all have one less slots ; except for the Gila. Yes could do with -1 slot. But traditionally the lost slot is a high slot for drone boats, at least that is what the Ishtar lost, and te Myrmidon lost, the Eos has one less high slot also.
These uses have been reported for using multiple identities to spam this thread. The accounts have posted repeatedly with the intention of giving the impression that a number of people hold a similar view.This has been passed to CCP for action. He is supporting his own position.
|

Wolfcyra
Radical Technologies
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 19:44:00 -
[1187] - Quote
Didn't read every post in here, but i got a question that comes with the new ships ... are there plans to bring out new sisters of eve items like for example a sisters of eve analyzer and or other items? .... just as a idea tho :) |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
1651
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 19:45:00 -
[1188] - Quote
Garviel Tarrant wrote:
Remove the ******* stupid covert ops thing from these ships and make them some other than a group of overpowered twatmobiles.
The Stratios could hold his own in a fight against ANY other pirate cruiser.. (Decimating most in fact) AND it has a cloak? I don't understand the logic behind giving a supposedly more rounded pirate ship the specialization bonus of a recon, its really weird.
The cloak is an integral part of exploration, but was suggested to give them the marauder treatment as to nerf there PVP a bit while not ruining there PVE side. Novis Initiis is Recruting-á --á Ideas for Drone Improvement |

Xequecal
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
88
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 19:46:00 -
[1189] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote:Mr Doctor wrote:Bouh Revetoile wrote:I guess it's the cloak thing who scare the **** out of everyone ; yet cloaky T3 exist for years and they are even less common than 100MN AB ones... Cloaky T3s dont do 700+ DPS, not even the Prot (maxes at around 500ish with proper fit and next to no range on that damage). Not true. If you calculate the dps the same way people calculated it for the Stratios (overheat all guns and drones), then you have 630 dps with the Proteus. And the Stratios don't have any more range than blasters. We are talking Ogre dps. And T3 have twice the tank of this Stratios BTW.
15km overheated web range to max Ogre damage application is far greater than 3km void range. |

Kenpo
61st Angry Angels
16
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 19:50:00 -
[1190] - Quote
Wolfcyra wrote:Didn't read every post in here, but i got a question that comes with the new ships ... are there plans to bring out new sisters of eve items like for example a sisters of eve analyzer and or other items? .... just as a idea tho :)
Excellent question, unfortunetly I do not have an answer, however, I wouldn't put it past CCP to have something planned that they haven't shared as of yet. Caution, rubber gloves and faceshield required when handling this equipment. |
|

Reth Alithes
State War Academy Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 20:21:00 -
[1191] - Quote
Wolfcyra wrote:Didn't read every post in here, but i got a question that comes with the new ships ... are there plans to bring out new sisters of eve items like for example a sisters of eve analyzer and or other items? .... just as a idea tho :) I'd love to see a Sister's Analyzer. Slightly better than T1 (25 strength vs 20, T2 has 30). Catch is that it can do both data and relic sites so you can save yourself a midslot at the cost of efficiency when hacking.
Also faction Drone mods outside of the Omnilink like the navigation computer or damage amp. But, those would be more likely to come from the Gallente Fed. corporations before they hit the shelves with another. |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
1651
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 20:24:00 -
[1192] - Quote
Reth Alithes wrote:Wolfcyra wrote:Didn't read every post in here, but i got a question that comes with the new ships ... are there plans to bring out new sisters of eve items like for example a sisters of eve analyzer and or other items? .... just as a idea tho :) I'd love to see a Sister's Analyzer. Slightly better than T1 (25 strength vs 20, T2 has 30). Catch is that it can do both data and relic sites so you can save yourself a midslot at the cost of efficiency. I think being able to do both would be extremely OP, especially if it was better than a T1 at that point. It would have to either be like other faction mods and have easier fitting and same stats as T2 or heaver fitting and better than T2.
For one to do both it would need to be worse at it than a T1 module. Novis Initiis is Recruting-á --á Ideas for Drone Improvement |

Reth Alithes
State War Academy Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 20:26:00 -
[1193] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:Reth Alithes wrote:Wolfcyra wrote:Didn't read every post in here, but i got a question that comes with the new ships ... are there plans to bring out new sisters of eve items like for example a sisters of eve analyzer and or other items? .... just as a idea tho :) I'd love to see a Sister's Analyzer. Slightly better than T1 (25 strength vs 20, T2 has 30). Catch is that it can do both data and relic sites so you can save yourself a midslot at the cost of efficiency. I think being able to do both would be extremely OP, especially if it was better than a T1 at that point. It would have to either be like other faction mods and have easier fitting and same stats as T2 or heaver fitting and better than T2. For one to do both it would need to be worse at it than a T1 module. A man can dream, can't he? |

Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
343
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 20:37:00 -
[1194] - Quote
Mr Doctor wrote:Bouh Revetoile wrote:I guess it's the cloak thing who scare the **** out of everyone ; yet cloaky T3 exist for years and they are even less common than 100MN AB ones... Cloaky T3s dont do 700+ DPS, not even the Prot (maxes at around 500ish with proper fit and next to no range on that damage).
Cloaky prot can do ~700dps non-heated with cloak + probes fit and upto ~850dps heated in 5 gun cloak but no probes fit. (These are proper fits with battleship sized tanks not 30K EHP max gank fail fits).
EDIT: Infact its possible to get 722dps non-heated out of a cloak + probes fit and still ~110K EHP - the fit I used to use was missing a low slot due to being nullified. |

Bouh Revetoile
TIPIAKS
369
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 20:53:00 -
[1195] - Quote
Xequecal wrote:Bouh Revetoile wrote:Not true.
If you calculate the dps the same way people calculated it for the Stratios (overheat all guns and drones), then you have 630 dps with the Proteus.
And the Stratios don't have any more range than blasters. We are talking Ogre dps. And T3 have twice the tank of this Stratios BTW. 15km overheated web range to max Ogre damage application is far greater than 3km void range. Indeed, but if we go for details like this, we should stop these ridiculous numbers considering oh dps with blasters/void in the Stratios too and start talking about more rational things.
What remain is Ogre dps (4 unbonused guns do marginal dps compared to them). And then, well, it's ogres. If they were so blatantly overpowered, we would know it I think and drone boat wouldn't bother carrying anything else with them would they ?
It's just common sense here : the dps figures of the Stratios come almost only from the Ogres, yet Ogres were more often laugh at than feared and suddenly, because a ship with a cloak have them, they become completely overpowered.
Just a reminder : the last time we saw OP drones was because of tracking bonused Gardes. But hey, if Ogres already were OP, why nobody bothered to abuse them before ?
That leave the cloak, but as I showed, T3 can already do everything people here fear the Stratios to do, but have a largely bigger ehp*dps ratio (what matter in a brawl, and a ship using Ogres is a brawler) than the Stratios and most cruisers, so it's way more dangerous in fact than the Stratios can be ; yet we still haven't seen any cloaky Proteus roaming New Eden in a trail of unavoidable death. Of course T3 will cost more, but the largely higher ehp make them a lot more survivable and people never lacked isks to try such things ; yet Machariels seems to be more commons than these supposedly OP ships.
Because there also this direct relation : if the Stratios is OP, cloaky T3 are also OP. Yet I never heard of these kind of T3 being OP per se. 100MN and other combat variant, yes a lot ; T3 link too ; but cloaky ? I never really heard about them outside of carebears tears despite their huge power.
So did I miss something about cloaky T3 ? Because I think they are more related to nightmares of EFT warriors than anything else ; and I'd explain it with the cloak delay which prevent them to catch that many people. |

Xequecal
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
88
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 21:10:00 -
[1196] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote: Indeed, but if we go for details like this, we should stop these ridiculous numbers considering oh dps with blasters/void in the Stratios too and start talking about more rational things.
The Proteus does almost no DPS at 15km. The Stratios does 75% of its DPS at 15km. Also no one requires that you fit blasters. You can use lasers or ACs.
Quote:What remain is Ogre dps (4 unbonused guns do marginal dps compared to them). And then, well, it's ogres. If they were so blatantly overpowered, we would know it I think and drone boat wouldn't bother carrying anything else with them would they ?
How many 125m3 bandwidth drone boats have covops cloaks and thus can guarantee applying their webs via decloaking 2000m away? That's right, none of them
Quote:It's just common sense here : the dps figures of the Stratios come almost only from the Ogres, yet Ogres were more often laugh at than feared and suddenly, because a ship with a cloak have them, they become completely overpowered.
Pretty much, yeah. You can dodge being webbed against ships without cloaks.
|

epicurus ataraxia
Unchained Industrial Collective Defiance Enterprises
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 21:29:00 -
[1197] - Quote
Garviel Tarrant wrote:epicurus ataraxia wrote:Commander A9 wrote:Sisters of EVE are an international humanitarian science-and-religion organization, according to their info panel.
I like the idea of exploration bonuses, but is there any plan to incorporate some kind of remote boosting or repair feature in some capacity? Like a bonus to repair modules or drones or support activity? I think they are being more focused on single player mode rather than fleet,but I am really not sure, I think people are a bit scared of mission creep, but so much noise in this thread i lost touch with what real peoples opinion was on this, Something was mentioned about clouds of cloaky reppers, but not sure if that was a real person or one of the spammers. Why would you use a cloaky ship for missions? =/ Also there is plenty of broken PVE in this game, these ships are not going to significantly break it to be even worth talking about. IMO, ships should be balance around pvp, and PVE should be balanced around that. But thats just me. I'm most concerned by the addition of a high tank, high dps cloaky ship with a metric fuckton of ewar..
Sorry british phrase, mission creep means having a plan for something and so much gets added on it loses the point of it's existance. Not "missions" sorry |

Fr00b Snap
Sessrumnir's Chosen
18
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 21:37:00 -
[1198] - Quote
Xequecal wrote:Bouh Revetoile wrote: Indeed, but if we go for details like this, we should stop these ridiculous numbers considering oh dps with blasters/void in the Stratios too and start talking about more rational things.
The Proteus does almost no DPS at 15km. The Stratios does 75% of its DPS at 15km. Also no one requires that you fit blasters. You can use lasers or ACs.
Why would Proteus decloak at 15km? |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
1651
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 22:10:00 -
[1199] - Quote
I can't wait to try these on the test server. After that proper feedback can be posted. Novis Initiis is Recruting-á --á Ideas for Drone Improvement |

Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
343
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 22:13:00 -
[1200] - Quote
Fr00b Snap wrote: Why would Proteus decloak at 15km?
Added to which prot gets a point range bonus with appropriate sub-system which makes it a bit easier to keep stuff inside damage range. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 .. 93 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |