If you have 20 people in local then your interceptor friend isn't going to readily combat you unless he has 20 friends sitting on the other side of a gate, or on the ass end of a cyno. Which you should be able to have intel on, and if you don't you need better friends.

Justifying nerfs based on cowardice and unwillingness for a group of people to exploit what they have is pathetic.

Moon Goo is passive income

jeez, read yourself: http://eve-survival.org/wikka.php?wakka=Blockade4sa

i'm done arguing for today. please keep mario putzo in check. he seems to have some... unreasonable assumptions about ratting safety.

Bad example; interceptors are uncatchable. An interceptor can and will completely ignore your mythical gatecamp, land on grid with the person he wants to kill, using his awoxer warpin, and due to his inherently superior warp speed, land and have plenty of time to execute the miner or ratter before help can arrive. And even if he can't, the interceptor just uses his 2 second align to warp off.

Just stop. You are going nowhere.

If you have 20 people in local then your interceptor friend isn't going to readily combat you unless he has 20 friends sitting on the other side of a gate, or on the ass end of a cyno. Which you should be able to have intel on, and if you don't you need better friends.

Justifying nerfs based on cowardice and unwillingness for a group of people to exploit what they have is pathetic.

You have to be deliberately obtuse to think that highsec is less safe than nullsec.

Heh an interceptor ganking a plexer/ratter or miner.

Just tank your Mack brah and put drones on him. No Corp fits in GSF for tanking mining ships I guess?

and awoxer warp in? You definitely need better friends if you fear for being awoxed.

Heh an interceptor ganking a plexer/ratter or miner.

Just tank your Mack brah and put drones on him. No Corp fits in GSF for tanking mining ships I guess?

There's nothing mystical or special about nullsec game mechanics that somehow allow nullsec people to enjoy better security. Bubbles don't even do this due to the prevalence of nullified T3 cruisers with cynos and interceptors. Every tool we have in nullsec is available in highsec, plus you have CONCORD limiting the engagement window to several seconds, no ability to use cynos to circumvent intel, and you can always dock no matter where you go. You have to be deliberately obtuse to think that highsec is less safe than nullsec.

i appreciate that mario putzo is here to demonstrate the type of thinking about the game you need to oppose this change

Oh interceptor is out but now the T3 is in? hue hue hue. Come on guy, keep grasping.

You don't mine because you choose not to, not because you can't. You make less money plexing because you choose to not because you can't make more. There is no mechanics that put NS at a disadvantage pound for pound everything in NS is better isk wise, and more profitable market wise.

Choosing not to exploit that is based on your own unwillingness not because of lopsided mechanics. Perhaps if 90% of your systems weren't uninhabited you would see different results, but I am sure its hard when the vast majority of your alliance and coalition mates only log in/show up for timers and jabber pings.

Not a problem with the game, problem with the players.

Well maybe if coward coalition spent more time running mining opps and not forum CTA's then there wouldn't need to be a change.

Oh interceptor is out but now the T3 is in? hue hue hue. Come on guy, keep grasping.

You don't mine because you choose not to, not because you can't. You make less money plexing because you choose to not because you can't make more. There is no mechanics that put NS at a disadvantage pound for pound everything in NS is better isk wise, and more profitable market wise.

Choosing not to exploit that is based on your own unwillingness not because of lopsided mechanics. Perhaps if 90% of your systems weren't uninhabited you would see different results, but I am sure its hard when the vast majority of your alliance and coalition mates only log in/show up for timers and jabber pings.

Well maybe if coward coalition spent more time running mining opps and not forum CTA's then there wouldn't need to be a change.

It took me 20 seconds to locate a single instance of a solo interceptor killing a ratter, by the way.

it is true, an eve full of mario putzos would not need balancing because nobody would be able to figure out what the best thing was and do that

It limits a game designerGÇÖs ability to increase material composition on items when needed, as this would give players free stuff in the process. As an example, we were forced to add Extra Materials to most of the ships that have been through the Tiericide initiative (which by itself, added a lot of confusion for players engaged in Manufacturing).

Its a shame the Rorquals can only figuratively run on tears because goddamn do we have a geyser here

And Baltec, that battleship comparison was the most stupid thing I have yet seen you come out with, a unfitted BS on a gate in null compared to a unfitted BS in Jita on a gate. If it was a bing fitted BS they are likely do die much faster in Jita, you Goons are losing it if you come out with pap like that!

Generally you have to actually do something in order to do it. You know like actually mining asteroids in order to get the minerals. But I know I know bad isk/hr, so lets reduce that isk/hr everywhere else while not increasing it at all in the apparent problem area. Good Fix to a non-existant problem guys!.

So, according to this post, because a completely different situation (a "bing" fitted BS afk on a gate) might play out differently, the original situation (unfit BS afk on a gate) is invalid. Brilliant!

So, according to this post, because a completely different situation (a "bing" fitted BS afk on a gate) might play out differently, the original situation (unfit BS afk on a gate) is invalid. Brilliant!

Because people do missions and plexes in unfit ships. Come on GSF are these the best posters you got?