| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 69 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
280
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:23:19 -
[1591] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:Querns wrote:Veers Belvar wrote: But again...per you....there should be a real gank risk - so show me your kills.
If you don't have any (surprise) then you are implicitly agreeing that Bowheads are increasing the gank risk and therefore need more tank and a quicker align time.
Found one: https://zkillboard.com/kill/42294111/
Also, your implication is facile. Not a travel fit....proving my point for me.....with full tank mods those 26 ships would have been nowhere near enough dps. While travelling a brick tanked cloak + mwd battleships has very near to a 0% chance of being ganked. A bowhead, which can be trapped through bumping, has a much higher gank chance. I mean, this is trivial stuff.....at some point you just need to admit that you are wrong. It has three inertia stabs on it, thats to get it into warp faster. Thats what a travel fit requires. Brick tanking is not a travel fit, its brick tanking.
Actually I have no clue what that fit is.....no tank in mids....istabs in lows....no DC....kinda crazy fit....and lots of stuff in cargo.
If it wasn't on zkill, I'd think it was a fraud!
But definitely not a "travel fit."
And now he is dead. GF |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
280
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:24:05 -
[1592] - Quote
Querns wrote:Also, how do the bumpers keep the ship locked down without giving the target a weapons timer, which attracts CONCORD (which, by your own admission, makes the gank significantly more difficult?) Why doesn't the bowhead or freighter simply safe log the moment they start to get bumped?
They aggress with a rookie ship to create an LE timer.
Code has this down to a science...I assume miniluv does as well. |

Valterra Craven
367
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:25:10 -
[1593] - Quote
Querns wrote:Why doesn't the bowhead or freighter simply safe log the moment they start to get bumped?
I've actually thought about this myself, but given that safe warp brings you right back to where you started, don't the bumpers just have to keep bumping you again? Its not as if the bumper is under a time crunch given how slow those ships are to align. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13901
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:26:51 -
[1594] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:
Actually I have no clue what that fit is.....no tank in mids....istabs in lows....no DC....kinda crazy fit....and lots of stuff in cargo.
If it wasn't on zkill, I'd think it was a fraud!
But definitely not a "travel fit."
And now he is dead. GF
Those things in the hold? Thats his normal fit.
He put on stabs to get into warp faster, its a travel fit. Every time you post you somehow manage to show that you know less and less about this game.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
280
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:28:10 -
[1595] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:
Actually I have no clue what that fit is.....no tank in mids....istabs in lows....no DC....kinda crazy fit....and lots of stuff in cargo.
If it wasn't on zkill, I'd think it was a fraud!
But definitely not a "travel fit."
And now he is dead. GF
Those things in the hold? Thats his normal fit. He put on stabs to get into warp faster, its a travel fit. Every time you post you somehow manage to show that you know less and less about this game.
Confirming that travel fits have no tank in mids, and no DC in low.  
No cloak either. 
and carry around 1.5 bil of implants in cargo.  |

Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
1025
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:29:06 -
[1596] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Querns wrote:Also, how do the bumpers keep the ship locked down without giving the target a weapons timer, which attracts CONCORD (which, by your own admission, makes the gank significantly more difficult?) Why doesn't the bowhead or freighter simply safe log the moment they start to get bumped? They aggress with a rookie ship to create an LE timer. Code has this down to a science...I assume miniluv does as well. Uh, you only get a Limited Engagement timer if you fire upon someone with a suspect flag. How do freighters do this? I guess the bowhead could fit a point in its midslots, but doing that is very silly.
Shooting the freighter creates an aggression timer and attracts concord, which makes the gank a lot harder.
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|

Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
1025
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:30:00 -
[1597] - Quote
Valterra Craven wrote:Querns wrote:Why doesn't the bowhead or freighter simply safe log the moment they start to get bumped? I've actually thought about this myself, but given that safe warp brings you right back to where you started, don't the bumpers just have to keep bumping you again? Its not as if the bumper is under a time crunch given how slow those ships are to align. You just stay logged off until the gankers go away. Scouting the gate with an alt helps you figure out when it's time to log in again.
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13901
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:30:41 -
[1598] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Confirming that travel fits have no tank in mids, and no DC in low.   No cloak either.  and carry around 1.5 bil of implants in cargo. 
No, they dont tend to fit a cloak or overtank the ship. This guy was a moron no doubt but that is what a normal travel fit looks like. You fit for speed not tank and you sure as hell don't fit billion isk mods.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
280
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:32:44 -
[1599] - Quote
Querns wrote:Valterra Craven wrote:Querns wrote:Why doesn't the bowhead or freighter simply safe log the moment they start to get bumped? I've actually thought about this myself, but given that safe warp brings you right back to where you started, don't the bumpers just have to keep bumping you again? Its not as if the bumper is under a time crunch given how slow those ships are to align. You just stay logged off until the gankers go away. Scouting the gate with an alt helps you figure out when it's time to log in again.
Them shooting at you prevents the logoff I think. So when you disconnect on gate, you get warped 1 mil km off.....they quickly scan down and send a rookie ship to agress....this prevents logoff....the they bump away from concord....and come in for the kill. |

Lady Rift
What Shall We Call It
106
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:35:17 -
[1600] - Quote
Querns wrote:Valterra Craven wrote: I'm sorry but that is a pretty flimsy argument considering that before I even mention your affiliations I said you were above them. This is doubly true when the points I was making were referring to how others were posting in this thread and that I was trying to find a way to confront THEIR foolishness. You will note that I never requested you to provide that data, because well you never made that arguement. In my response to you I said I wouldn't refrain from asking others to back up their claims when they were making arguments that can't be backed up. Since I had already stated that I did not observe that behavior from you I'm not sure how you could possibly conclude that you were included in the same vein as your affliates.
The principle still applies GÇö your preconceived notions due to the poster's alliance colored your responses. If you were willing to overlook it for me, personally, great GÇö-áthat doesn't excuse you for turning heel and continuing to do it to others. I inherently discard all information about a poster's alliance and corporation when posting because using that information to assassinate a person's character is poor form. It makes things too easy. I prefer to operate from a position where that cannot be used against me, and I often succeed. Valterra Craven wrote: Well then what was the point you were trying to make? I fail to see how how barge HP changes relate to the state of ganking as a whole when looking at changes like crime watch etc.
The point is that the barge EHP increase had a measurable effect in reducing the incidence of suicide ganking. Hell, we can measure it right now GÇö-áI, personally, stopped suicide ganking due to that change. Too much effort for too little reward.
don't worry I've run into this "i quit ganking barges" after the last change and I have made an alt to take your place. so balance is restored. |

Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
1025
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:39:56 -
[1601] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Querns wrote:Valterra Craven wrote:Querns wrote:Why doesn't the bowhead or freighter simply safe log the moment they start to get bumped? I've actually thought about this myself, but given that safe warp brings you right back to where you started, don't the bumpers just have to keep bumping you again? Its not as if the bumper is under a time crunch given how slow those ships are to align. You just stay logged off until the gankers go away. Scouting the gate with an alt helps you figure out when it's time to log in again. Them shooting at you prevents the logoff I think. So when you disconnect on gate, you get warped 1 mil km off.....they quickly scan down and send a rookie ship to agress....this prevents logoff....the they bump away from concord....and come in for the kill. Not if you safelog. Safe logout takes 30 seconds, and as long as you aren't aggressed, you disappear from space immediately after the 30s timer elapses. It is the premiere choice for Folks Logging Out In Space.
Also, when you log in again, you immediately enter emergency warp without having to align. There's no way for someone to aggress you before you initiate the e-warp, and if someone DOES manage to somehow, the GMs will reimburse your ship if you petition it.
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|

Lady Rift
What Shall We Call It
106
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:40:33 -
[1602] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:Confirming that travel fits have no tank in mids, and no DC in low.   No cloak either.  and carry around 1.5 bil of implants in cargo.  No, they dont tend to fit a cloak or overtank the ship. This guy was a moron no doubt but that is what a normal travel fit looks like. You fit for speed not tank and you sure as hell don't fit billion isk mods.
you do normaly fit tank in mids along with prop. That guy was just lazy. |

Valterra Craven
367
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:41:06 -
[1603] - Quote
Querns wrote: You just stay logged off until the gankers go away. Scouting the gate with an alt helps you figure out when it's time to log in again.
You will have to forgive me for thinking that this example shows why Eve has a tendency to have a bad reputation... |

Lady Rift
What Shall We Call It
106
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:42:27 -
[1604] - Quote
Querns wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:Querns wrote:Valterra Craven wrote:Querns wrote:Why doesn't the bowhead or freighter simply safe log the moment they start to get bumped? I've actually thought about this myself, but given that safe warp brings you right back to where you started, don't the bumpers just have to keep bumping you again? Its not as if the bumper is under a time crunch given how slow those ships are to align. You just stay logged off until the gankers go away. Scouting the gate with an alt helps you figure out when it's time to log in again. Them shooting at you prevents the logoff I think. So when you disconnect on gate, you get warped 1 mil km off.....they quickly scan down and send a rookie ship to agress....this prevents logoff....the they bump away from concord....and come in for the kill. Not if you safelog. Safe logout takes 30 seconds, and as long as you aren't aggressed, you disappear from space immediately after the 30s timer elapses. It is the premiere choice for Folks Logging Out In Space. Also, when you log in again, you immediately enter emergency warp without having to align. There's no way for someone to aggress you before you initiate the e-warp, and if someone DOES manage to somehow, the GMs will reimburse your ship if you petition it.
e warp takes you to the same spot that you left from they would aggress you there. so you have to log on when they arent around anymore |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13901
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:46:11 -
[1605] - Quote
Valterra Craven wrote:Querns wrote: You just stay logged off until the gankers go away. Scouting the gate with an alt helps you figure out when it's time to log in again.
You will have to forgive me for thinking that this example shows why Eve has a tendency to have a bad reputation...
A simple web frigate counters the bumping anyway and get the freighter into warp so fast it enters the warp tunnel in sideways.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
1028
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:47:35 -
[1606] - Quote
Oh and here we go
travel fit machariel found with a cloak and mwd found
https://zkillboard.com/kill/42170465/
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|

Valterra Craven
367
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:50:55 -
[1607] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Valterra Craven wrote:Querns wrote: You just stay logged off until the gankers go away. Scouting the gate with an alt helps you figure out when it's time to log in again.
You will have to forgive me for thinking that this example shows why Eve has a tendency to have a bad reputation... A simple web frigate counters the bumping anyway and get the freighter into warp so fast it enters the warp tunnel sideways.
This is very true, what a webbing frigate doesn't do is combat the reputation that Eve is infested by griefers...
(otherwise pages like this wouldn't even exist) http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Skullduggery_101#What_are_Griefers.3F |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13901
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:54:06 -
[1608] - Quote
That's a rather bad article, Griefing is a bannable offence and is very much not what was described in that site.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
1290
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 22:01:14 -
[1609] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:That's a rather bad article, Griefing is a bannable offence and is very much not what was described in that site. It's also hideously out of date.
CCP has no sense of humour.
|

Sir Gankal0t
Fortuna Heavy Industries Viral Society
23
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 22:05:28 -
[1610] - Quote
Here is a better one
|

Valterra Craven
367
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 22:06:25 -
[1611] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:
That's a rather bad article, Griefing is a bannable offence and is very much not what was described in that site.
Again all true. But given that the distinction between pirate and griefer can be rather grey and confusing to new players, there is a reason that Eve has the rep it does. |

Dreiden Kisada
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
21
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 23:14:10 -
[1612] - Quote
Valterra Craven wrote:baltec1 wrote:
That's a rather bad article, Griefing is a bannable offence and is very much not what was described in that site.
Again all true. But given that the distinction between pirate and griefer can be rather grey and confusing to new players, there is a reason that Eve has the rep it does.
Gotta say that you claiming to be on the side of Right on Eve's reputation is pretty laffo considering some things you've posted in the past. |

Come2Light
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 23:23:31 -
[1613] - Quote
Valterra Craven wrote: This is very true, what a webbing frigate doesn't do is combat the reputation that Eve is infested by griefers...
This is very true, what a webbing frigate doesn't do is combat that Eve is infested by goons...
Fixed it for you. :) |

Alexis Nightwish
54
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 23:41:29 -
[1614] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Will probably give you guys updated numbers for HP and bonus change tomorrow, did want to address the jump fatigue generation thing which seems to be coming up a little bit at least.
Every 'hauler' in the game got this reduction because the fatigue change wasn't meant to hit logistics, this ship simply fits under that umbrella. It is not meant as any kind of special treatment or specific incentive to use it outside of high-sec. It's fine if that happens but I just wanted to point out that it's a role based bonus and that's all. So given what you say here, can we safely assume that in the future this fatigue bonus will go away as is implied by Greyscale's statement:
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone,
We've collected, parsed and thoroughly discussed your *extensive* feedback on the proposed long-distance travel changes, both in the official thread and elsewhere, consulted with the CSM, and made adjustments accordingly.
Conclusions we have reached through this exercise: [list] The ease of nullsec logistics permitted by jump freighters and, to a lesser extent, jump bridge networks is not aligned with where we would like nullsec industry to be.
[*]It *is*, however, pretty well aligned with where nullsec industry is right now. As we improve the status quo for industry in nullsec, we will want to reevaluate this balance, along with the impact potential changes would have on logistical work for other areas of the game.
Power Projection: A Brighter Future
|

EvilweaselFinance
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
342
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 23:41:53 -
[1615] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote: cloak in highs, 2 pith as and 2 lses and gist x mwd in mids, 2 1600 faction plates, 4 x type harderners and dcs in low.....it would be more with shield rigs...overheated 300k ehp
holy moly is this ever a terrible fit
has anyone clued him into why when ganking deadspaced out battleships the active tank doesn't matter one bit yet |

Querns
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
1029
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 23:44:12 -
[1616] - Quote
Alexis Nightwish wrote:CCP Rise wrote:Will probably give you guys updated numbers for HP and bonus change tomorrow, did want to address the jump fatigue generation thing which seems to be coming up a little bit at least.
Every 'hauler' in the game got this reduction because the fatigue change wasn't meant to hit logistics, this ship simply fits under that umbrella. It is not meant as any kind of special treatment or specific incentive to use it outside of high-sec. It's fine if that happens but I just wanted to point out that it's a role based bonus and that's all. So given what you say here, can we safely assume that in the future this fatigue bonus will go away as is implied by Greyscale's statement:
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone,
We've collected, parsed and thoroughly discussed your *extensive* feedback on the proposed long-distance travel changes, both in the official thread and elsewhere, consulted with the CSM, and made adjustments accordingly.
Conclusions we have reached through this exercise: [list] The ease of nullsec logistics permitted by jump freighters and, to a lesser extent, jump bridge networks is not aligned with where we would like nullsec industry to be.
It *is*, however, pretty well aligned with where nullsec industry is right now. As we improve the status quo for industry in nullsec, we will want to reevaluate this balance, along with the impact potential changes would have on logistical work for other areas of the game.
That statement was concerning Jump Freighters getting special-cased to be 10LY.
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|

EvilweaselFinance
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
342
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 23:53:00 -
[1617] - Quote
Valterra Craven wrote:baltec1 wrote:
That's a rather bad article, Griefing is a bannable offence and is very much not what was described in that site.
Again all true. But given that the distinction between pirate and griefer can be rather grey and confusing to new players, there is a reason that Eve has the rep it does. yes, all those newbies flying freighters that are loaded with enough goods they're worth making a special effort to gank |

Valterra Craven
367
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 00:01:36 -
[1618] - Quote
Dreiden Kisada wrote: Gotta say that you claiming to be on the side of Right on Eve's reputation is pretty laffo considering some things you've posted in the past.
Oh, I never claimed to be on the side of "Right".
|

Valterra Craven
367
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 00:05:44 -
[1619] - Quote
EvilweaselFinance wrote: yes, all those newbies flying freighters that are loaded with enough goods they're worth making a special effort to gank
Who said anything about newbies flying the freighters? I was implying that the newbie would be flying the webbing frigate and would be wondering why something like that would necessary for safety...
|

EvilweaselFinance
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
342
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 00:15:47 -
[1620] - Quote
Valterra Craven wrote:EvilweaselFinance wrote: yes, all those newbies flying freighters that are loaded with enough goods they're worth making a special effort to gank
Who said anything about newbies flying the freighters? I was implying that the newbie would be flying the webbing frigate and would be wondering why something like that would necessary for safety... no highsec hauler would ever have a newbie on webbing duty
either: 1) they are not in-corp and not dueling and they're going to blow up repeatedly, leading to a newbie having to repeatedly buy and fit new ships which will be painstakingly long
2) they are in-corp or dueling, and our idiot freighter pilot is trusting some random newbie with the ability to awox his entire cargo and the random newbie is probably a CODE alt and he's about five minutes away from destruction |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 69 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |