Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |

Togg Bott
One Clone Gang
29
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:14:00 -
[1321] - Quote
As a part time miner... i am sadened by the massive numbers of mining ship fail fit kills. it is now very easy to survive being ganked not by fitting a mining ship to be ungankable... you just have to fit a little better than the other guy. Gankers... and i have done this in the past myself (not miner ships but afk auto pilot to jita with mass loot in them). will go for the guy that offers them the most bling for their cost. always has been. but even with the upcoming changes... we will still see people fit T2 exhumers for max yield instead of tanking them. ganking will still be profitable (maybe not quite as profitable) because CCP cant change the bot/afk miners thought process.
this is in my opinion not going to kill the gankers off... instead its gonna give them many many new targets. balance will still be there. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1475
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:17:00 -
[1322] - Quote
Togg Bott wrote: As a part time miner... i am sadened by the massive numbers of mining ship fail fit kills. it is now very easy to survive being ganked not by fitting a mining ship to be ungankable... you just have to fit a little better than the other guy. Gankers... and i have done this in the past myself (not miner ships but afk auto pilot to jita with mass loot in them). will go for the guy that offers them the most bling for their cost. always has been. but even with the upcoming changes... we will still see people fit T2 exhumers for max yield instead of tanking them. ganking will still be profitable (maybe not quite as profitable) because CCP cant change the bot/afk miners thought process.
this is in my opinion not going to kill the gankers off... instead its gonna give them many many new targets. balance will still be there.
this guy gets it EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

Mallak Azaria
399
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:22:00 -
[1323] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Togg Bott wrote: As a part time miner... i am sadened by the massive numbers of mining ship fail fit kills. it is now very easy to survive being ganked not by fitting a mining ship to be ungankable... you just have to fit a little better than the other guy. Gankers... and i have done this in the past myself (not miner ships but afk auto pilot to jita with mass loot in them). will go for the guy that offers them the most bling for their cost. always has been. but even with the upcoming changes... we will still see people fit T2 exhumers for max yield instead of tanking them. ganking will still be profitable (maybe not quite as profitable) because CCP cant change the bot/afk miners thought process.
this is in my opinion not going to kill the gankers off... instead its gonna give them many many new targets. balance will still be there. this guy gets it
He will unfortunately suffer the most in the end though. He has put in effort to survive & will be one of the few that don't deserve the inevitable hit to their wallets when veld goes back to 1 isk PU. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
280
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:26:00 -
[1324] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Togg Bott wrote: As a part time miner... i am sadened by the massive numbers of mining ship fail fit kills. it is now very easy to survive being ganked not by fitting a mining ship to be ungankable... you just have to fit a little better than the other guy. Gankers... and i have done this in the past myself (not miner ships but afk auto pilot to jita with mass loot in them). will go for the guy that offers them the most bling for their cost. always has been. but even with the upcoming changes... we will still see people fit T2 exhumers for max yield instead of tanking them. ganking will still be profitable (maybe not quite as profitable) because CCP cant change the bot/afk miners thought process.
this is in my opinion not going to kill the gankers off... instead its gonna give them many many new targets. balance will still be there. this guy gets it He will unfortunately suffer the most in the end though. He has put in effort to survive & will be one of the few that don't deserve the inevitable hit to their wallets when veld goes back to 1 isk PU.
who cares if trit is 1isk/unit? that means ships will be pocket change, you'll mine for the same amount of time to buy the same amount of stuff. in real terms nothing has changed. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Pipa Porto
533
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:30:00 -
[1325] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:who cares if trit is 1isk/unit? that means ships will be pocket change, you'll mine for the same amount of time to buy the same amount of stuff. in real terms nothing has changed.
Only if you never buy T2, Meta, or Faction gear. Or anything requiring PI. Or anything manufactured (amortized Blueprint cost). EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Mallak Azaria
399
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:30:00 -
[1326] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Togg Bott wrote: As a part time miner... i am sadened by the massive numbers of mining ship fail fit kills. it is now very easy to survive being ganked not by fitting a mining ship to be ungankable... you just have to fit a little better than the other guy. Gankers... and i have done this in the past myself (not miner ships but afk auto pilot to jita with mass loot in them). will go for the guy that offers them the most bling for their cost. always has been. but even with the upcoming changes... we will still see people fit T2 exhumers for max yield instead of tanking them. ganking will still be profitable (maybe not quite as profitable) because CCP cant change the bot/afk miners thought process.
this is in my opinion not going to kill the gankers off... instead its gonna give them many many new targets. balance will still be there. this guy gets it He will unfortunately suffer the most in the end though. He has put in effort to survive & will be one of the few that don't deserve the inevitable hit to their wallets when veld goes back to 1 isk PU. who cares if trit is 1isk/unit? that means ships will be pocket change, you'll mine for the same amount of time to buy the same amount of stuff. in real terms nothing has changed.
Except exhumers still use mostly moon goo for production & won't be overly affected by the cost of trit. In fact anything that is T2, faction/DS/Officer... Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
281
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:39:00 -
[1327] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Dave stark wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Togg Bott wrote: As a part time miner... i am sadened by the massive numbers of mining ship fail fit kills. it is now very easy to survive being ganked not by fitting a mining ship to be ungankable... you just have to fit a little better than the other guy. Gankers... and i have done this in the past myself (not miner ships but afk auto pilot to jita with mass loot in them). will go for the guy that offers them the most bling for their cost. always has been. but even with the upcoming changes... we will still see people fit T2 exhumers for max yield instead of tanking them. ganking will still be profitable (maybe not quite as profitable) because CCP cant change the bot/afk miners thought process.
this is in my opinion not going to kill the gankers off... instead its gonna give them many many new targets. balance will still be there. this guy gets it He will unfortunately suffer the most in the end though. He has put in effort to survive & will be one of the few that don't deserve the inevitable hit to their wallets when veld goes back to 1 isk PU. who cares if trit is 1isk/unit? that means ships will be pocket change, you'll mine for the same amount of time to buy the same amount of stuff. in real terms nothing has changed. Except exhumers still use mostly moon goo for production & won't be overly affected by the cost of trit. In fact anything that is T2, faction/DS/Officer...
tech is being nerfed too so prices will still come down. i have no idea how long the tech cartel has around, but a year ago trit was half of what it is now, so were hulk prices, they've both gone up at similar rates.
don't forget if people don't have isk to spend, demand goes down, as do prices. people can't spend what they don't have. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Mallak Azaria
399
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:50:00 -
[1328] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:tech is being nerfed too so prices will still come down. i have no idea how long the tech cartel has around, but a year ago trit was half of what it is now, so were hulk prices, they've both gone up at similar rates.
don't forget if people don't have isk to spend, demand goes down, as do prices. people can't spend what they don't have.
A year ago, Hulks were worth 195m. 195 is not half of 300. I was also buying trit at 1.59isk PU on average a year ago. If you really believe that miners not having much isk will make the price of everything go down, then I don't know what to say. Tech isn't the only valuable moon material that is mined.
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Tomcio FromFarAway
Singularity's Edge
149
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:51:00 -
[1329] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:but a year ago trit was half of what it is now, so were hulk prices, they've both gone up at similar rates.
I really hope you aren't suggesting that mineral prices have any real impact on T2 production. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
281
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:54:00 -
[1330] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Dave stark wrote:tech is being nerfed too so prices will still come down. i have no idea how long the tech cartel has around, but a year ago trit was half of what it is now, so were hulk prices, they've both gone up at similar rates.
don't forget if people don't have isk to spend, demand goes down, as do prices. people can't spend what they don't have. A year ago, Hulks were worth 195m. 195 is not half of 300. I was also buying trit at 1.59isk PU on average a year ago. If you really believe that miners not having much isk will make the price of everything go down, then I don't know what to say. Tech isn't the only valuable moon material that is mined.
i paid 130 for my first and only hulk, that same hulk is now worth some where between 250 and 300m. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
|

True Sight
Deep Freeze Industries
50
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:54:00 -
[1331] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:But the risk-free parking your exhumer in a belt and sucking up all the rocks or ice you can will be there. This is a situation that I do not like, and I dislike it more than I dislike the ability for a 12M ISK blaster catalyst to blow up at 300M ISK hulk before CONCORD can intervene. At least the miner has the option of fitting a tank. When it comes to mining in perfect safety, the options are "mine heaps" or "mine even more heaps" there is no control of this system except the individual's perceived value of time.
Someone running a Bot will continue to do so while the value of running that Bot is greater than zero. Thus humans competing with Bots will end up in the situation of mining for marginally more than 0ISK/hr. The humans will be better off running stealth bomber alts in Minmatar militia.
So while you are celebrating cheaper ships, just be aware that you are supporting bots.
You make a few valid points, but I think you're missing part of the flip-side too, as its not as if the gankers are there are exclusively ganking the bots, they are quite happy to take out normal players too since their local-tears are far more tasty than the silent bot that sits patiently waiting to be podded afterwards.
Remember that with these changes, the Mackinaw doesn't become a god-immune ship, it just means its going to cost more than a 3M ISK Blaster Catalyst to blow it up, maybe a Blaster Thorax? or Talos?, I think thats fair. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
281
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:55:00 -
[1332] - Quote
Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:Dave stark wrote:but a year ago trit was half of what it is now, so were hulk prices, they've both gone up at similar rates. I really hope you aren't suggesting that mineral prices have any real impact on T2 production.
no. i'm merely justifying that the amount of time i had to mine trit at 3.4isk/unit to buy a ship then, is the same amount of time i have to mine trit at nearly 7 isk/unit to buy the same ship now. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
281
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:57:00 -
[1333] - Quote
also hulk resists have been lowered, looks like ganker's tears work as well as miner's tears. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Tomcio FromFarAway
Singularity's Edge
149
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:58:00 -
[1334] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:Dave stark wrote:but a year ago trit was half of what it is now, so were hulk prices, they've both gone up at similar rates. I really hope you aren't suggesting that mineral prices have any real impact on T2 production. no. i'm merely justifying that the amount of time i had to mine trit at 3.4isk/unit to buy a ship then, is the same amount of time i have to mine trit at nearly 7 isk/unit to buy the same ship now.
So you are suggesting that Hulk price will drop to ~130 as a result of trit dropping back to 3isk? |

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
446
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:01:00 -
[1335] - Quote
True Sight wrote:
Remember that with these changes, the Mackinaw doesn't become a god-immune ship, it just means its going to cost more than a 3M ISK Blaster Catalyst to blow it up, maybe a Blaster Thorax? or Talos?, I think thats fair.
If you claim that all it will take to bust one of the 'new' Mackinaws is a 'Thorax or a Talos', you are either lying or deluded.
|

Alexzandvar Douglass
NUTS AND BOLTS MANUFACTURING En Garde
61
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:01:00 -
[1336] - Quote
Oh yes I should spend hundreds of millions on 1 ship just so 1 guy in a 3 million isk ship can gank me in several hits.
CCP is just making it so the cost equates with the ships usefulness, not to mention the Mackinaw needed love anyways. Ice miners rejoice! |

Werst Dendenahzees
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
96
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:05:00 -
[1337] - Quote
Alexzandvar Douglass wrote:Oh yes I should spend hundreds of millions on 1 ship just so 1 guy in a 3 million isk ship can gank me in several hits.
CCP is just making it so the cost equates with the ships usefulness, not to mention the Mackinaw needed love anyways. Ice miners rejoice!
A 1 billion isk Vindicator can't gank the new barges either. |

Death2all Supercaps
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:05:00 -
[1338] - Quote
OH MY GOD TITAN PRICES ARE GOING DOWN!
MORE TITANS FOR ME TO SHOOT!
:fap: :fap: :fap:
Bring it on.  |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1719
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:06:00 -
[1339] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Togg Bott wrote: As a part time miner... i am sadened by the massive numbers of mining ship fail fit kills. it is now very easy to survive being ganked not by fitting a mining ship to be ungankable... you just have to fit a little better than the other guy. Gankers... and i have done this in the past myself (not miner ships but afk auto pilot to jita with mass loot in them). will go for the guy that offers them the most bling for their cost. always has been. but even with the upcoming changes... we will still see people fit T2 exhumers for max yield instead of tanking them. ganking will still be profitable (maybe not quite as profitable) because CCP cant change the bot/afk miners thought process.
this is in my opinion not going to kill the gankers off... instead its gonna give them many many new targets. balance will still be there. this guy gets it He will unfortunately suffer the most in the end though. He has put in effort to survive & will be one of the few that don't deserve the inevitable hit to their wallets when veld goes back to 1 isk PU.
Official bet: I will give you 1 billion if within 6 months from the patch trit goes to 1 ISK pu (Jita IV price).
If it does not, you will give me 1 billion instead.
Chribba or Grendell will be used to hold my and your billion in the mean time.
Deal? Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
447
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:07:00 -
[1340] - Quote
Alexzandvar Douglass wrote:Oh yes I should spend hundreds of millions on 1 ship just so 1 guy in a 3 million isk ship can gank me in several hits.
CCP is just making it so the cost equates with the ships usefulness, not to mention the Mackinaw needed love anyways. Ice miners rejoice!
Its a shame that after investing 'hundreds of millions' on a new ship, you didn't spend a few more on
A) MSE II B) Thermal/Kinetic Hardeners/ShieldAmps C) DC II D) 5x ECM drones.
Any combination of the above list gives you the ability to survive '1 guy in a 3 million ISK ship', if not more. 68 pages, and there are still people posting that still can't grasp this simple concept. |
|

Pipa Porto
533
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:07:00 -
[1341] - Quote
True Sight wrote: You make a few valid points, but I think you're missing part of the flip-side too, as its not as if the gankers are there are exclusively ganking the bots, they are quite happy to take out normal players too since their local-tears are far more tasty than the silent bot that sits patiently waiting to be podded afterwards.
Remember that with these changes, the Mackinaw doesn't become a god-immune ship, it just means its going to cost more than a 3M ISK Blaster Catalyst to blow it up, maybe a Blaster Thorax? or Talos?, I think thats fair.
An Cargo Hulk (weaker tank than unfit) requires a T2 Fit Catalyst to Solo, costing 15m ISK.
The new Mack is going to have a 60k EHP tank. That will take 5 T2 fit Catalysts at a cost of 75m ISK. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
281
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:09:00 -
[1342] - Quote
Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:Dave stark wrote:Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:Dave stark wrote:but a year ago trit was half of what it is now, so were hulk prices, they've both gone up at similar rates. I really hope you aren't suggesting that mineral prices have any real impact on T2 production. no. i'm merely justifying that the amount of time i had to mine trit at 3.4isk/unit to buy a ship then, is the same amount of time i have to mine trit at nearly 7 isk/unit to buy the same ship now. So you are suggesting that Hulk price will drop to ~130 as a result of trit dropping back to 3isk?
no. it's unclear if the components list for a hulk will change, it also depends on the price of other minerals, the demand for hulks etc. however generally the time it takes to buy some thing as a miner now shouldn't be too far from what it will cost in the future if what has happened in the past continues.
i won't pretend i understand economy and pricing and stuff. i'm just saying what has happened, and what should happen if that continues. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Sarik Olecar
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:09:00 -
[1343] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:who cares if trit is 1isk/unit? that means ships will be pocket change, you'll mine for the same amount of time to buy the same amount of stuff. in real terms nothing has changed.
Just a friendly reminder to all my mining friends that ganking and hulkageddon has almost no impact on the prices of minerals. That amounts mined everyday would require 10's of thousands of hulks to be ganked everyday, and even that is assuming the miner doesn't immediately reship and get back at it.
The recent increase in minerals is infact to due changes with old loot mechanics, that allowed the vast majority of minerals to come from mission runners and gun miners. Now that this has been rectified, the decreased supply has caused prices to jump, and prices are likely to remain very high for the near future.
I know Helicity and the goonies like to pretend that they're responsible for these changes, but this 'crusade' against 'bots' really has no effect other then making funny whine threads on the forums. A bot will not unsub because he was ganked. A player might but that's still unlikely. He will just reship into a genuine OTEC Hulk and get right back atter'.
Miners aren't some rodent that needs to be 'culled' to keep prices in check. This is just part of the hate propaganda designed to make ganking seem more appealing to your average miner. But don't be fooled, they're not ganking for your benefit, but for they're own.
These buffs are a necessary reaction to the 'emergent gameplay' everyone speaks so highly about. A miner is the only ship that has to give up every free slot if it wants to tank 'effectively' and even then alot of gankers will see a tank as challenge rather than a deterrent. The changes allows for more flexibility in fitting, gives a purpose to the other 5 mining ships, and I can almost guarantee is the first step towards an entire overhaul of industry/harvesting.
There will still be dumb miners, and now you can confidently tell them to HTFU or GTFO with a straight face - instead of the garbage that's spewed now (Why didn't you use every slot to tank and have and Orca with links and RR and have a webbing alt so you could stay aligned???) |

Werst Dendenahzees
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
96
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:10:00 -
[1344] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Togg Bott wrote: As a part time miner... i am sadened by the massive numbers of mining ship fail fit kills. it is now very easy to survive being ganked not by fitting a mining ship to be ungankable... you just have to fit a little better than the other guy. Gankers... and i have done this in the past myself (not miner ships but afk auto pilot to jita with mass loot in them). will go for the guy that offers them the most bling for their cost. always has been. but even with the upcoming changes... we will still see people fit T2 exhumers for max yield instead of tanking them. ganking will still be profitable (maybe not quite as profitable) because CCP cant change the bot/afk miners thought process.
this is in my opinion not going to kill the gankers off... instead its gonna give them many many new targets. balance will still be there. this guy gets it He will unfortunately suffer the most in the end though. He has put in effort to survive & will be one of the few that don't deserve the inevitable hit to their wallets when veld goes back to 1 isk PU. Official bet: I will give you 1 billion if within 6 months from the patch trit goes to 1 ISK pu (Jita IV price). If it does not, you will give me 1 billion instead. Chribba or Grendell will be used to hold my and your billion in the mean time. Deal?
I won't reach 1 isk, but certainly 3 isk. Isotopes will likewise reach 300-500 isk. This will nuke the incomes of highsec miners by half. |

Rain King
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:10:00 -
[1345] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Rain King wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:Oh he mad. But is he wrong? Nope. Fitted properly, a Hulk cannot be profitably ganked. Yeah, he mad and wrong. Game got harder, and predictably, those wanting easy kills and grief now have to actually put more effort into their game. The coin has flipped. No extra effort, just extra money. The problem is that without the changes, the only reason Hulks were profitable to gank was the bad choices of the miners. CCP is rewarding the stupid choices of miners. They're giving the Hulk a buff that it does not need.
Excerpt from the dev blog.
GÇóNew ORE frig: we want this ship to replace current mining frigates as low barrier of entry vessel, but also fulfill high-end gameplay expectations by providing a very mobile platform for mining in hostile space. Lowest mining output, decent ore bay, little to no resilience.
GÇóProcurer/Skiff: primarily made for self-defense. Better mining rate than the ORE frig, good ore bay, but capable of having battleship-like EHP.
GÇóRetriever/Mackinaw: made for self-reliance. Has the largest ore bay, similear to the size of a jet can, second best mining output but less EHP than the procurer mining barge.
GÇóCovetor/Hulk: ore bay is identical to its current cargo hold, little to average EHP, but best mining output. Basically made for group operations when players have industrials and protection to back them up.
Can you please show me where the Hulk is being buffed? |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
281
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:11:00 -
[1346] - Quote
Rain King wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Rain King wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:Oh he mad. But is he wrong? Nope. Fitted properly, a Hulk cannot be profitably ganked. Yeah, he mad and wrong. Game got harder, and predictably, those wanting easy kills and grief now have to actually put more effort into their game. The coin has flipped. No extra effort, just extra money. The problem is that without the changes, the only reason Hulks were profitable to gank was the bad choices of the miners. CCP is rewarding the stupid choices of miners. They're giving the Hulk a buff that it does not need. Excerpt from the dev blog. GÇóNew ORE frig: we want this ship to replace current mining frigates as low barrier of entry vessel, but also fulfill high-end gameplay expectations by providing a very mobile platform for mining in hostile space. Lowest mining output, decent ore bay, little to no resilience. GÇóProcurer/Skiff: primarily made for self-defense. Better mining rate than the ORE frig, good ore bay, but capable of having battleship-like EHP. GÇóRetriever/Mackinaw: made for self-reliance. Has the largest ore bay, similear to the size of a jet can, second best mining output but less EHP than the procurer mining barge. GÇóCovetor/Hulk: ore bay is identical to its current cargo hold, little to average EHP, but best mining output. Basically made for group operations when players have industrials and protection to back them up. Can you please show me where the Hulk is being buffed?
click the forum list, click the sisi feedback forum, big thread there outlining the buff, and following nerf of the hulk's tank. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Alexzandvar Douglass
NUTS AND BOLTS MANUFACTURING En Garde
62
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:12:00 -
[1347] - Quote
Doesn't really matter to me anyway, since I'm a null sec Ice miner. All this means is less docking and more mining. Not to mention quicker ice cycles!  |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1719
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:13:00 -
[1348] - Quote
Sarik Olecar wrote: There will still be dumb miners, and now you can confidently tell them to HTFU or GTFO with a straight face - instead of the garbage that's spewed now (Why didn't you use every slot to tank and have and Orca with links and RR and have a webbing alt so you could stay aligned???)
You forgot the obvious Tengu off grid booster too. Could not believe my eyes when I have seen it put in EFT to engross displayed EHP. This along with min maxing against kin / therm, while my gank ship sales tell EMP is still used too. Ship pre-scanning happens! Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
281
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:14:00 -
[1349] - Quote
Alexzandvar Douglass wrote:Doesn't really matter to me anyway, since I'm a null sec Ice miner. All this means is less docking and more mining. Not to mention quicker ice cycles! 
not entirely true since your mack will be mining less ice, even with the new ice rig. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1719
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:15:00 -
[1350] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Togg Bott wrote: As a part time miner... i am sadened by the massive numbers of mining ship fail fit kills. it is now very easy to survive being ganked not by fitting a mining ship to be ungankable... you just have to fit a little better than the other guy. Gankers... and i have done this in the past myself (not miner ships but afk auto pilot to jita with mass loot in them). will go for the guy that offers them the most bling for their cost. always has been. but even with the upcoming changes... we will still see people fit T2 exhumers for max yield instead of tanking them. ganking will still be profitable (maybe not quite as profitable) because CCP cant change the bot/afk miners thought process.
this is in my opinion not going to kill the gankers off... instead its gonna give them many many new targets. balance will still be there. this guy gets it He will unfortunately suffer the most in the end though. He has put in effort to survive & will be one of the few that don't deserve the inevitable hit to their wallets when veld goes back to 1 isk PU. Official bet: I will give you 1 billion if within 6 months from the patch trit goes to 1 ISK pu (Jita IV price). If it does not, you will give me 1 billion instead. Chribba or Grendell will be used to hold my and your billion in the mean time. Deal? I won't reach 1 isk, but certainly 3 isk.
Ah, I thought I read 1 ISK PU in the quoted text. Has to be bad sight of mine.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |