| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
484
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 19:58:00 -
[2761] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote: That was me trying to help Rodyas refine his method of avoiding Suicide Ganks. Good job with the reading.
The sad part? All this hard work we did, separating the idiots from the clever miners is going right out the window. Some of them were actually learning to make their Exhumers gank-resistant and raking in record ISK.
But now? All those hard choices? Gone.
Now its 'gee, how much EHP can I squeeze out of this Max-Yield fit?
Balancing Yield with Cargo and EHP? Nope, too hard for miners. CCP says: we are sick of listening to your whines when you gamble and lose, so we are making those decisions for you.
So CCP makes all miners 'winners' - and crush your income into the mud, as they balance around the lowest common denominator, and AFK mining, 50K EHP Mackinaws flood the zone.  |

Shukuzen Kiraa
Neurodyne
197
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 20:02:00 -
[2762] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:Pipa Porto wrote: That was me trying to help Rodyas refine his method of avoiding Suicide Ganks. Good job with the reading.
The sad part? All this hard work we did, separating the idiots from the clever miners is going right out the window. Some of them were actually learning to make their Exhumers gank-resistant and raking in record ISK. But now? All those hard choices? Gone. Now its 'gee, how much EHP can I squeeze out of this Max-Yield fit? Balancing Yield with Cargo and EHP? Nope, too hard for miners. CCP says: we are sick of listening to your whines when you gamble and lose, so we are making those decisions for you. So CCP makes all miners 'winners' - and crush your income into the mud, as they balance around the lowest common denominator, and AFK mining, 50K EHP Mackinaws flood the zone. 
So round up a couple more guys and kill them some more....damn man if you spent any time at all thinking of ways to adapt to the changes instead of all of your time whining about them you would see that you're still going to be able to kill the ones who don't bother tanking easily enough. |

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
485
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 20:23:00 -
[2763] - Quote
Shukuzen Kiraa wrote:
So round up a couple more guys and kill them some more....damn man if you spent any time at all thinking of ways to adapt to the changes instead of all of your time whining about them you would see that you're still going to be able to kill the ones who don't bother tanking easily enough. And give me a break "all the hard work we did" Dude... suicide ganking untanked afk miners and bots is just about the furthest you can get from hard work. Adapt or quit, I prefer you quit. Not gonna ask for your stuff though...all your tears have soaked into everything you own and ruined them.
Its called, "providing consequences" for botting and AFK mining.
And yes, training miners to tank is very hard work.
They are very slow learners. It often takes 4 or 5 kills on the same miner before they figure it out. |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
597
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 21:48:00 -
[2764] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:[...]
Balancing Yield with Cargo and EHP? Nope, too hard for miners. CCP says: we are sick of listening to your whines when you gamble and lose, so we are making those decisions for you.
[...]
^^That^^ is the real problem here.
If I may say so myself, I think my sig. pretty much covers it.
Meta-gaming for carebears:
Whine on the forums like a little ***** until CCP gets sick of you and hands you everything you ask for just to shut you up. |

GetSirrus
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 01:08:00 -
[2765] - Quote
Let me pose a Hypothetical for you OP:
What is your future in Eve if CCP removed all ORE faction vessels from the game? |

Pipa Porto
633
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 01:11:00 -
[2766] - Quote
GetSirrus wrote:Let me pose a Hypothetical for you OP:
What is your future in Eve if CCP removed all ORE faction vessels from the game?
Welcome to EVE 2004, where Mining is one of the more profitable pastimes in EVE.
Also, who's proposing that? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Shukuzen Kiraa
Neurodyne
198
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 02:11:00 -
[2767] - Quote
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:[...]
Balancing Yield with Cargo and EHP? Nope, too hard for miners. CCP says: we are sick of listening to your whines when you gamble and lose, so we are making those decisions for you.
[...]
^^That^^ is the real problem here. If I may say so myself, I think my sig. pretty much covers it.
I don't think CCP did it because people whined...otherwise griefers would be getting everything they want and then some since its all they do. They are rebalancing ALL ship classes...it was simply the barges turn. When a combat ship gets buffed next and people think its over powered....you all will have nothing to say other then "deal with it"
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1240
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 02:22:00 -
[2768] - Quote
Shukuzen Kiraa wrote:I don't think CCP did it because people whined...otherwise griefers would be getting everything they want and then some since its all they do. They are rebalancing ALL ship classes...it was simply the barges turn. When a combat ship gets buffed next and people think its over powered....you all will have nothing to say other then "deal with it" Now if the buffed ship is somehow able to now go about ganking ~profitably~. Like, you know, the Catalyst buff. Maybe some Amarr BC will become the top ganking ship (with lazerzzzz)
Then they can whine.
Or, you know, ~certain blobbers~ might make fleets of the ship and soon the world degenerates into blobs of ~that one ship~. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1240
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 02:25:00 -
[2769] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:Balancing Yield with Cargo and EHP? Nope, too hard for miners. CCP says: we are sick of listening to your whines when you gamble and lose, so we are making those decisions for you. Oh that's a pity.
Now people won't be cargohold expanding their hulk, but they can still try to cram in the MLUs and use the rig slots for overclocks, right? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
615
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 04:02:00 -
[2770] - Quote
Beekeeper Bob wrote:Attempting to keep this thread alive single-handedly? Face it, you simply want easy mode ganking noobs, and your bent over the fact that you can't have that anymore.... Go learn to fight real ships, it's much more entertaining. 
Well for good reason too. The OP came back and started discussin real issues. Was just being a good custodian.
Yeah the hulk stats look a bit weak really. Guess I shouldn't be surprised though. I fly gallente, and shouldn't have expected more then the gallente buff.
That said, it does depend on remote locations and how often they come for ganks. Gonna take me a while to get a final decision made. Just won't be risking a hulk until I see how things pan out. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
132
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 04:22:00 -
[2771] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Now if the buffed ship is somehow able to now go about ganking ~profitably~. Like, you know, the Catalyst buff. Maybe some Amarr BC will become the top ganking ship (with lazerzzzz)
In case you didn't know Amarr ships are only good for showing off (statue shooting and such).
Alavaria Fera wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:Balancing Yield with Cargo and EHP? Nope, too hard for miners. CCP says: we are sick of listening to your whines when you gamble and lose, so we are making those decisions for you. Oh that's a pity. Now people won't be cargohold expanding their hulk, but they can still try to cram in the MLUs and use the rig slots for overclocks, right?
In case you didn't know some of the tank setups require ACR rig. |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
601
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 04:24:00 -
[2772] - Quote
Shukuzen Kiraa wrote:Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:[...]
Balancing Yield with Cargo and EHP? Nope, too hard for miners. CCP says: we are sick of listening to your whines when you gamble and lose, so we are making those decisions for you.
[...]
^^That^^ is the real problem here. If I may say so myself, I think my sig. pretty much covers it. I don't think CCP did it because people whined...otherwise griefers would be getting everything they want and then some since its all they do. They are rebalancing ALL ship classes...it was simply the barges turn. When a combat ship gets buffed next and people think its over powered....you all will have nothing to say other then "deal with it"
You might have convinced me there (<---Sarcasm, OK? Sarcasm!)...Might have, except for one thing:
The so-called "griefers" (Read the EULA, OK? It's not griefing, it's 100% legitimate gameplay in an open-world sandbox built entirely around non-consensual competition at all levels of gameplay) have been taking nerf after nerf after nerf in just my 3.5 years playing, with no sign of let-up anytime soon, with no corresponding buffs.
With possibly, if CCPGreyscale's utter pants-on-head drug-dream of a proposal during the CSM Summit is to be believed, even worse to come.
So where's the balance?
Or, Satan forbid new content, especially exclusive to losec? Because what we have, its age is starting to show, to put it mildly. Meta-gaming for carebears:
Whine on the forums like a little ***** until CCP gets sick of you and hands you everything you ask for just to shut you up. |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
615
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 04:26:00 -
[2773] - Quote
And now you are being griefed. Or have been griefed for the last 3.5 years. I don't know why you are complaining, escpecially since the EULA allows you "griefers" to be griefed. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
601
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 04:31:00 -
[2774] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:
[...] Maybe some Amarr BC will become the top ganking ship (with lazerzzzz)
Then they can whine.
Or, you know, ~certain blobbers~ might make fleets of the ship and soon the world degenerates into blobs of ~that one ship~.
My testing has shown that the tank-fit barges will be weakest to Kinetics, though, secondary Explosive, at least for the Tech I barges. (Assuming 2x EM, 1x Thermic resist rig plus Invuln and DCU II)
Sui-Manticore and/or -Hound gank-squad, X up! Meta-gaming for carebears:
Whine on the forums like a little ***** until CCP gets sick of you and hands you everything you ask for just to shut you up. |

Soundwave Plays Diablo
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
76
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 04:34:00 -
[2775] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:So whats the verdict on the final Exhumer stats?
Sure looks like a nice bait and switch. Greyscales' balancing adjustments seemed to go out the window and they more or less just went with the original iteration.... Personally, I'm quite happy with them... can't wait 'till Wednesday.^^
WTF? I thought this was going in the winter expansion? Its a couple months late for this expansion?
Really? Its an INFERNO update?
Am I missing something?
|

Pipa Porto
633
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 04:37:00 -
[2776] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Now if the buffed ship is somehow able to now go about ganking ~profitably~. Like, you know, the Catalyst buff. Maybe some Amarr BC will become the top ganking ship (with lazerzzzz) In case you didn't know Amarr ships are only good for showing off (statue shooting and such).
Nope.
Quote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:Balancing Yield with Cargo and EHP? Nope, too hard for miners. CCP says: we are sick of listening to your whines when you gamble and lose, so we are making those decisions for you. Oh that's a pity. Now people won't be cargohold expanding their hulk, but they can still try to cram in the MLUs and use the rig slots for overclocks, right? In case you didn't know some of the tank setups require ACR rig.
So? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
601
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 04:41:00 -
[2777] - Quote
rodyas wrote:And now you are being griefed. Or have been griefed for the last 3.5 years. I don't know why you are complaining, escpecially since the EULA allows you "griefers" to be griefed.
Except that I'm not complaining that I'm being griefed.
I have never once been griefed in this game, nor have I done so to anyone else, nor would I.
Guess what?
Neither have you, unless you can prove that someone is following/harassing you on an extended basis solely for malicious enjoyment, or if an experienced player tried to can-/wreck-bait you in a starter system when you were new.
These are griefing as CCP defines it, and can get a person banned.
What is so hard about this?
The "less-savoury" aspects of EVE play-styles are not griefing, and never were.
Kindly take your other-MMO-informed preconceptions, and put them somewhere far away from this one, please, EVE =/= WoW and clones, nor will it ever.
Next! Meta-gaming for carebears:
Whine on the forums like a little ***** until CCP gets sick of you and hands you everything you ask for just to shut you up. |

Soundwave Plays Diablo
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
76
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 04:52:00 -
[2778] - Quote
Quote:escpecially since the EULA allows you "griefers" to be griefed.
Lets face it, anyone who has both read the EULA AND played the game knows...
1. "Grief Play" is a banable offense. 2. It is at CCP's discretion. 3. CCP bans no one for "grief play"
That being said, eventually there will be a harassment lawsuit because of said policy. While grief play is tolerated, harassment is illegal in most halfway decent places.
|

Lilianna Star
State War Academy Caldari State
21
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 04:53:00 -
[2779] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:[quote=Pipa Porto] The sad part? All this hard work we did, separating the idiots from the clever miners is going right out the window. Some of them were actually learning to make their Exhumers gank-resistant and raking in record ISK. But now? All those hard choices? Gone. Now its 'gee, how much EHP can I squeeze out of this Max-Yield fit? Balancing Yield with Cargo and EHP? Nope, too hard for miners. CCP says: we are sick of listening to your whines when you gamble and lose, so we are making those decisions for you. So CCP makes all miners 'winners' - and crush your income into the mud, as they balance around the lowest common denominator, and AFK mining, 50K EHP Mackinaws flood the zone. 
The entire basis for your argument seems to be that they shouldn't be designing mining in high security around the brainless people.
My question is: Why is this a problem? |

Soundwave Plays Diablo
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
76
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 05:12:00 -
[2780] - Quote
Lilianna Star wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:[quote=Pipa Porto] The sad part? All this hard work we did, separating the idiots from the clever miners is going right out the window. Some of them were actually learning to make their Exhumers gank-resistant and raking in record ISK. But now? All those hard choices? Gone. Now its 'gee, how much EHP can I squeeze out of this Max-Yield fit? Balancing Yield with Cargo and EHP? Nope, too hard for miners. CCP says: we are sick of listening to your whines when you gamble and lose, so we are making those decisions for you. So CCP makes all miners 'winners' - and crush your income into the mud, as they balance around the lowest common denominator, and AFK mining, 50K EHP Mackinaws flood the zone.  The entire basis for your argument seems to be that they shouldn't be designing mining in high security around the brainless people. My question is: Why is this a problem?
What brainless people?
The only brainless people I have seen in this thread are the ones that think there is some amount of tank one can put on a ship to block any amount of alpha, even though Titans are not even that powerful.
|

Lilianna Star
State War Academy Caldari State
21
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 05:15:00 -
[2781] - Quote
Soundwave Plays Diablo wrote:
What brainless people?
The only brainless people I have seen in this thread are the ones that think there is some amount of tank one can put on a ship to block any amount of alpha, even though Titans are not even that powerful.
I don't think anyone is that stupid.
Tank fits are to deter gankers by increasing the cost of said gank. |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
615
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 05:25:00 -
[2782] - Quote
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:rodyas wrote:And now you are being griefed. Or have been griefed for the last 3.5 years. I don't know why you are complaining, escpecially since the EULA allows you "griefers" to be griefed. Except that I'm not complaining that I'm being griefed. I have never once been griefed in this game, nor have I done so to anyone else, nor would I. Guess what? Neither have you, unless you can prove that someone is following/harassing you on an extended basis solely for malicious enjoyment, or if an experienced player tried to can-/wreck-bait you in a starter system when you were new. These are griefing as CCP defines it, and can get a person banned. What is so hard about this? The "less-savoury" aspects of EVE play-styles are not griefing, and never were. Kindly take your other-MMO-informed preconceptions, and put them somewhere far away from this one, please, EVE =/= WoW and clones, nor will it ever. Next!
Oh it does seem like we have a vocabulary problem. How smart of you to see it and call it out.
Hm, will be hard to say it now. Lets see, I was equating griefing to ganking, to CCP ignoring you and not buffing you at all.
So in a way CCP has been ganking you for 3.5 years. Just how hard it sounded, made me think of griefing, but in the legal sense it is not. So welcome to CCP ignoring you for the next 3.5 years, since that is the EULA at work. (and they are not griefing you) I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
601
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 05:47:00 -
[2783] - Quote
rodyas wrote:
Oh it does seem like we have a vocabulary problem. How smart of you to see it and call it out.
Hm, will be hard to say it now. Lets see, I was equating griefing to ganking, so CCP ganking you when they ignored you and not buffed you at all.
So in a way CCP has been ganking you for 3.5 years. Just how hard it sounded, made me think of griefing, but in the legal sense it is not. So welcome to CCP ignoring you for the next 3.5 years, since that is the EULA at work. (and they are not griefing you)
Except that ganking isn't griefing.
CCP defines what griefing is, and they have never said "suicide ganking = griefing," in fact just the opposite somewhere, IIRC.
And no, CCP isn't "griefing" us the way you put it, because we will adapt, after some grumbling. That's what proper MMOG sandbox players do. Because, you know, EVE Is Hard (TM), and that's what makes it good.
Except that you lot have just had an easy-button handed to you, which I thought CCP was dealing with (ref.: Blap-Titans nerf, logoff-under-aggro mechanics)?
Something you lot utterly refuse to do, unless you count this now year-plus old Whinge-Baby Jihad(TM) as "adapting." (Hint: It's not.)
As for the gankers?
Bring Kinetics. Lots of it!
E:
Oh, much longer than that, 3.5 years-plus is just my time in EVE.
Long before my time, you could tank, fight, and destroy CONCORD, although I think that they'd finish you eventually, and escape them through a BLOPs portal (as you can BLOPs bridge from hisec just fine, just not into it.) before CCP hard-coded that out.
It sounds to me like you would have really had something to whinge about then, bru. Meta-gaming for carebears:
Whine on the forums like a little ***** until CCP gets sick of you and hands you everything you ask for just to shut you up. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
132
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 05:51:00 -
[2784] - Quote
Why Amarr ships were only seen in comedy setups in ATX matches? Every time I see Amarr ship used in large fleets they are shooting their own drones and use 8 different crystals or they are shooting structures (mostly statues).
"Fitting mods and rigs are very bad idea!" |

Pipa Porto
633
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 05:55:00 -
[2785] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Why Amarr ships were only seen in comedy setups in ATX matches? Every time I see Amarr ship used in large fleets they are shooting their own drones and use 8 different crystals or they are shooting structures (mostly statues). "Fitting mods and rigs are very bad idea!"
Because the AT is a realistic representation of the rest of EVE, which is why you can never have more than one Logistics ship in a fleet normally. Of course.
Hellcats, Slowcats, AHAX. What do these all have in common? They're primarily Amarr fleet comps.
Where did I say fitting mods and rigs are a bad idea? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
615
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 06:00:00 -
[2786] - Quote
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:rodyas wrote:
Oh it does seem like we have a vocabulary problem. How smart of you to see it and call it out.
Hm, will be hard to say it now. Lets see, I was equating griefing to ganking, so CCP ganking you when they ignored you and not buffed you at all.
So in a way CCP has been ganking you for 3.5 years. Just how hard it sounded, made me think of griefing, but in the legal sense it is not. So welcome to CCP ignoring you for the next 3.5 years, since that is the EULA at work. (and they are not griefing you)
Except that ganking isn't griefing. CCP defines what griefing is, and they have never said "suicide ganking = griefing," in fact just the opposite somewhere, IIRC. And no, CCP isn't "griefing" us the way you put it, because we will adapt, after some grumbling. That's what proper MMOG sandbox players do. Because, you know, EVE Is Hard (TM), and that's what makes it good. Except that you lot have just had an easy-button handed to you, which I thought CCP was dealing with (ref.: Blap-Titans nerf, logoff-under-aggro mechanics)? Something you lot utterly refuse to do, unless you count this now year-plus old Whinge-Baby Jihad(TM) as "adapting." (Hint: It's not.) As for the gankers? Bring Kinetics. Lots of it! E: Oh, much longer than that, 3.5 years-plus is just my time in EVE. Long before my time --so grandma tells me, anyway  -- you could tank, fight, and destroy CONCORD, although I think that they'd finish you eventually, and escape them through a BLOPs portal (as you can BLOPs bridge from hisec just fine, just not into it.) before CCP hard-coded that out. It sounds to me like you would have really had something to whinge about then, bru.
eh, I 'll take it. The mining barge buff. Sounds better then what you have to do.
Also us just agreeing on vocabulary mistakes, doesn't makes us brus. That takes time, effort, and alot of AFK mining together to make us brus. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
132
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 06:02:00 -
[2787] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Hellcats
Maels...
Ishtars and armor Lokis... |

Pipa Porto
633
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 06:08:00 -
[2788] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Hellcats Maels... Ishtars and armor Lokis...
Ah, no. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Blastcaps Madullier
Celestial Horizon Corp. Ethereal Dawn
79
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 15:13:00 -
[2789] - Quote
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:have been taking nerf after nerf after nerf in just my 3.5 years playing, with no sign of let-up anytime soon, with no corresponding buffs. *cough* crucible changes *cough* Destroyers had their ROF penalty removed, hybrids got something of a buff and tier 3's came out so your saying that didn't happen? :) |

baltec1
Bat Country
1815
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 15:14:00 -
[2790] - Quote
Blastcaps Madullier wrote:Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:have been taking nerf after nerf after nerf in just my 3.5 years playing, with no sign of let-up anytime soon, with no corresponding buffs. *cough* crucible changes *cough* Destroyers had their ROF penalty removed, hybrids got something of a buff and tier 3's came out so your saying that didn't happen? :)
Shh, dont show him how adaptable we are. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |