Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 21 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Theodoric Darkwind
PonyWaffe Test Alliance Please Ignore
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 05:49:00 -
[361] - Quote
Name Family Name wrote:How about you stop being ******* renters and join a real alliance that can actually defend the space you claim?
Problem solved.
QFT
Carebears are NOT entitled to nullsec space free of intruders, if you want risk free PvE go back to highsec.
absolutely nothing wrong with parking a cloaky in someones system, especially when it extracts delicious carebear tears. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
267
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 05:51:00 -
[362] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:This forum is less than a month old, are they to respond with a red and blue tag to every topic even if they've been over it 1000 times before on the old forums, now they are somehow beholden to you and yours to respond to your every beck and call?
The actaully respond within a day or two. They've even been and cleaned posts here.
Quote: So here you sit, insulting the helpful community thats trying to show you that you are not in fact treading over new ground and that everything you are saying and suggesting has both been said and suggested before, by a great number of people.
At which post number would you like me to start quoting the trolls that did not and will not contribute constructive discussion?
Quote: Do you really think that over 8 years somebody else hasn't said "Man I hate this cloaked dude in my system", and that somehow your stand with your 3 friends against 12 pages of people telling you that nobody cares will make a difference?
Nice use of statistics. Did you mean in 12 pages, 3 people haven't been able to get through to YOUR friends. The debate has waxed and waned and been wasted - and neither the OP's or his "supporters" have seeen ANYTHING to justify allowing
>>>> SLEEPING AFK cloakies. <<<<<<<<
This issue is NOT about cloakies, not SB's. Not BLOPs, not HD's.... It's about
[drum roll]
>>>>>>> SLEEPING cloakies - you know - IN BED ASLEEP...... <<<<<<<<<
No argument against >>>>> this SINGLE point <<<< has been put forward conclusively. Everything else yes, but none of those were in question. NONE of them.....
>>>>>> NO cloaky can possibly be "active" for 23/7, 5,6,7 days straight - doesn't matter what he's doing. <<<<<<<
Besides, YOU actually came into this debate rabbiting on about bots ffs..... That's a troll..... Period.
To whit.....
Quote:Stealthbombers also have no tank at all, if your botting program was any good, or you weren't afk yourself, you'd just turn your guns on the offending stealth bomber and watch him go up in smoke.
And I bet you've done that too yeah... The whole HD fleet even yeah? But hey.
THAT wasn't even the topic anyway...... Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 05:51:00 -
[363] - Quote
Actually its not local nor the afk cloackers
its ISK/hr attitude which is threatened. The all-mighty isk/hr the reason why "most" people stays in game. Some are better at it and providing wide aspect of gameplay for several other corporations or and alliances some are worse at it and worked under stress of next bill and getting things done for few people...
|

L Salander
All Web Investigations
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 05:56:00 -
[364] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:L Salander wrote:The best solution is just ignore the cloaky alts Until they uncloak and hotdrop on you. Your silly solution is silly. I will support the fuel bay idea. Tho I worry it might impact some legit deep scout operations. In my opinion the best way is a rather expensive module that can only be fit on a destroyer (Tech 1 or 2) Hull. The purpose of this module would be launching a new type of probe that can unlock someone if a random point in space is located (A puzzle so to speak) The difference is that each scan takes 10-20x the scan time of a normal probe and is heavily influenced by scanning skills. Also a warning flashes if someone is probing your cloak sig and warping away will cause the point to reset, All this will do is remove the incentive to walk away from the keyboard while cloaked. You will have to check it once every few mins or so like people have to keep an eye on local today. This will balance the total power the AFK cloaker has and rewards the dedicated cloaker with being able to do serious recon as a benefit to his corp or alliance. Remove the AFK cloak incentive leave local alone.
If they uncloak and hotdrop you they're not afk. Deal with it. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
267
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 05:59:00 -
[365] - Quote
Theodoric Darkwind wrote:Name Family Name wrote:How about you stop being ******* renters and join a real alliance that can actually defend the space you claim?
Problem solved. QFT Carebears are NOT entitled to nullsec space free of intruders, if you want risk free PvE go back to highsec. absolutely nothing wrong with parking a cloaky in someones system, especially when it extracts delicious carebear tears. I've heard heaps of Testies bitching real bad at AFK cloakies in 7BX and/or PXF when you're trying to rat.
From memory, one cloaky was in 7BX for more than a month..... Is he still there?
Did you "get him"? Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 06:03:00 -
[366] - Quote
The Apostle wrote: No argument against >>>>> this SINGLE point <<<< has been put forward conclusively. Everything else yes, but none of those were in question. NONE of them.....
>>>>>> NO cloaky can possibly be "active" for 23/7, 5,6,7 days straight - doesn't matter what he's doing. <<<<<<<
.
No an argument has been presented, you've chosen to ignore it:
Can you prove 100% that the person in your local is AFK?
Until you can prove it, then you are making this all up in your head, and there is no way for you to prove they are AFK.
That is an argument against it.
Regardless of if you believe in the argument at all, it is an argument and the one that CCP and the rest of the community are standing on.
You have no proof, you are making wild accusations, and no game change will ever be put through on accusations alone.
|

The Apostle
The Black Priests
267
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 06:14:00 -
[367] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:The Apostle wrote: No argument against >>>>> this SINGLE point <<<< has been put forward conclusively. Everything else yes, but none of those were in question. NONE of them.....
>>>>>> NO cloaky can possibly be "active" for 23/7, 5,6,7 days straight - doesn't matter what he's doing. <<<<<<<
.
No an argument has been presented, you've chosen to ignore it: Can you prove 100% that the person in your local is AFK? You got it. Finally....
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 06:17:00 -
[368] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:The Apostle wrote: No argument against >>>>> this SINGLE point <<<< has been put forward conclusively. Everything else yes, but none of those were in question. NONE of them.....
>>>>>> NO cloaky can possibly be "active" for 23/7, 5,6,7 days straight - doesn't matter what he's doing. <<<<<<<
.
No an argument has been presented, you've chosen to ignore it: Can you prove 100% that the person in your local is AFK? You got it. Finally....
Now i think you're on drugs. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
267
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 06:20:00 -
[369] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:The Apostle wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:The Apostle wrote: No argument against >>>>> this SINGLE point <<<< has been put forward conclusively. Everything else yes, but none of those were in question. NONE of them.....
>>>>>> NO cloaky can possibly be "active" for 23/7, 5,6,7 days straight - doesn't matter what he's doing. <<<<<<<
.
No an argument has been presented, you've chosen to ignore it: Can you prove 100% that the person in your local is AFK? You got it. Finally.... Now i think you're on drugs. And if you need it explained then best be leaving.....
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 06:30:00 -
[370] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:The Apostle wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:The Apostle wrote: No argument against >>>>> this SINGLE point <<<< has been put forward conclusively. Everything else yes, but none of those were in question. NONE of them.....
>>>>>> NO cloaky can possibly be "active" for 23/7, 5,6,7 days straight - doesn't matter what he's doing. <<<<<<<
.
No an argument has been presented, you've chosen to ignore it: Can you prove 100% that the person in your local is AFK? You got it. Finally.... Now i think you're on drugs. And if you need it explained then best be leaving.....
If anybody else reading this can figure out what the hell happened and help a brother out I sure would appreciate it.
IDK maybe he comes from a country where you aren't presumed innocent until proven other wise, or I'm just missing something, or I don't understand moonspeak and he's off calculating the cosmic flux of th e universe.
I feel like i was in a conversation and the other guy in it suddenly out of the blue went "AH HA!" then turned around and walked away humming to himself.
|
|

Theodoric Darkwind
PonyWaffe Test Alliance Please Ignore
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 06:33:00 -
[371] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Theodoric Darkwind wrote:Name Family Name wrote:How about you stop being ******* renters and join a real alliance that can actually defend the space you claim?
Problem solved. QFT Carebears are NOT entitled to nullsec space free of intruders, if you want risk free PvE go back to highsec. absolutely nothing wrong with parking a cloaky in someones system, especially when it extracts delicious carebear tears. I've heard heaps of Testies bitching real bad at AFK cloakies in 7BX and/or PXF when you're trying to rat. From memory, one cloaky was in 7BX for more than a month..... Is he still there? Did you "get him"?
Any TESTie who whines about AFK cloakers is just asking to be trolled to no end by the rest of the alliance. I personally have never had a problem with AFK cloakers, if someone is parked in a ratting system I just find a different system to rat in until they leave.
Also anyone who rats in 6VDT or 7BX is just asking to get ganked.
Thanks to having a large npc pocket fountain is well infested with pirates looking for ratters to gank, yet you never see TEST whining about afk cloakers (even though on any given day several of our ratting systems will have afk cloakers in them).
Virtually all of the afk cloaker whine seems to come from lolrenters.
|

The Apostle
The Black Priests
267
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 06:35:00 -
[372] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:[If anybody else reading this can figure out what the hell happened and help a brother out I sure would appreciate it.
IDK maybe he comes from a country where you aren't presumed innocent until proven other wise, or I'm just missing something, or I don't understand moonspeak and he's off calculating the cosmic flux of th e universe.
I feel like i was in a conversation and the other guy in it suddenly out of the blue went "AH HA!" then turned around and walked away humming to himself.
Plain English.
Quote:Can you prove 100% that the person in your local is AFK?
You got it. Finally. You can't prove it and that's why it's so damned effective for system denial. It simply cannot be countered as a threat.
A low SP cloaky alt can shut down a whole system and he doesn't even need to be awake. If there was an appropriate counter (which is what we're asking for) then it's not an issue.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 06:39:00 -
[373] - Quote
The Apostle wrote: You can't prove it and that's why it's so damned effective for system denial. It simply cannot be countered as a threat.
A low SP cloaky alt can shut down a whole system and he doesn't even need to be awake. If there was an appropriate counter (which is what we're asking for) then it's not an issue.
So wait, what if he's not afk and just generally an insomniac and stays up for days at a time?
You sound more like you want to nerf cloaking, is that true?
Also whats wrong with all the effective counters proposed in this thread?
|

The Apostle
The Black Priests
267
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 06:40:00 -
[374] - Quote
Theodoric Darkwind wrote:The Apostle wrote:Theodoric Darkwind wrote:Name Family Name wrote:How about you stop being ******* renters and join a real alliance that can actually defend the space you claim?
Problem solved. QFT Carebears are NOT entitled to nullsec space free of intruders, if you want risk free PvE go back to highsec. absolutely nothing wrong with parking a cloaky in someones system, especially when it extracts delicious carebear tears. I've heard heaps of Testies bitching real bad at AFK cloakies in 7BX and/or PXF when you're trying to rat. From memory, one cloaky was in 7BX for more than a month..... Is he still there? Did you "get him"? Any TESTie who whines about AFK cloakers is just asking to be trolled to no end by the rest of the alliance. I personally have never had a problem with AFK cloakers, if someone is parked in a ratting system I just find a different system to rat in until they leave. Also anyone who rats in 6VDT or 7BX is just asking to get ganked. Thanks to having a large npc pocket fountain is well infested with pirates looking for ratters to gank, yet you never see TEST whining about afk cloakers (even though on any given day several of our ratting systems will have afk cloakers in them). Virtually all of the afk cloaker whine seems to come from lolrenters. Dude, you're either new there or you don't rat. Testies were the biggest whiners about AFK cloakies I ever heard or saw. So often I heard
"ffs, can someone come kill this fn cloaky, he's been here 2 weeks!!" " let's form a fleet and get this cloaky, he's pissing me off"
yadda ya....
As always reply was. You can't. Which is the point of this topic. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

The Apostle
The Black Priests
267
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 06:46:00 -
[375] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:The Apostle wrote: You can't prove it and that's why it's so damned effective for system denial. It simply cannot be countered as a threat.
A low SP cloaky alt can shut down a whole system and he doesn't even need to be awake. If there was an appropriate counter (which is what we're asking for) then it's not an issue.
So wait, what if he's not afk and just generally an insomniac and stays up for days at a time? You sound more like you want to nerf cloaking, is that true? Also whats wrong with all the effective counters proposed in this thread? Grath, c'mon man, tell me you're trolling.
There are no counters other than to run away or dock up indefinitely. Which is exactly the point.
The proposal is NOT to nerf cloakies (hell no), it''s to look at a way that gracefully degrades a cloak or allows a scan on them which can be easily countered by said cloaky IF HE IS ACTIVE....
If he's in bed he's dead. Simple. Nothing more. Nothing less. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 06:52:00 -
[376] - Quote
19 pages and cloakies still working exactly as intended. Yawn. |

Theodoric Darkwind
PonyWaffe Test Alliance Please Ignore
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 06:58:00 -
[377] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Theodoric Darkwind wrote:The Apostle wrote:Theodoric Darkwind wrote:Name Family Name wrote:How about you stop being ******* renters and join a real alliance that can actually defend the space you claim?
Problem solved. QFT Carebears are NOT entitled to nullsec space free of intruders, if you want risk free PvE go back to highsec. absolutely nothing wrong with parking a cloaky in someones system, especially when it extracts delicious carebear tears. I've heard heaps of Testies bitching real bad at AFK cloakies in 7BX and/or PXF when you're trying to rat. From memory, one cloaky was in 7BX for more than a month..... Is he still there? Did you "get him"? Any TESTie who whines about AFK cloakers is just asking to be trolled to no end by the rest of the alliance. I personally have never had a problem with AFK cloakers, if someone is parked in a ratting system I just find a different system to rat in until they leave. Also anyone who rats in 6VDT or 7BX is just asking to get ganked. Thanks to having a large npc pocket fountain is well infested with pirates looking for ratters to gank, yet you never see TEST whining about afk cloakers (even though on any given day several of our ratting systems will have afk cloakers in them). Virtually all of the afk cloaker whine seems to come from lolrenters. Dude, you're either new there or you don't rat. Testies were the biggest whiners about AFK cloakies I ever heard or saw. So often I heard "ffs, can someone come kill this fn cloaky, he's been here 2 weeks!!" " let's form a fleet and get this cloaky, he's pissing me off" yadda ya.... As always reply was. You can't. Which is the point of this topic.
Ive been in TEST for 4 months, what few afk cloaker whiners I have seen get trolled horribly and other than 7BX (which is a stupid system to rat in anyway since the hostiles in 6VDT 23/7 are usually NOT afk) ive never seen an afk cloaker sit in a system more than 1-2 days. We even have some stupid afk cloakers that sit in non-ratting systems lol. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
267
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 07:03:00 -
[378] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:19 pages and cloakies still working exactly as intended. Yawn. Yes they do. I used to blop with a rapier on the bridge as point man. The waiting and anticipation to get a blob in and smack some poor ratter was joyous. Succesful blops feeels sooo elite.....
And get this, if the AFK cloakies were made to fight or spooked into action, all the boys in system would know when a cloaky came in that a fight was on, instead of having their time wasted with faggotry.
It'd make blops even more joyous...
You know, turn it from "yawn, again?!" to "LET"S DO THIS!"...... Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 07:10:00 -
[379] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:KrakizBad wrote:19 pages and cloakies still working exactly as intended. Yawn. Yes they do. I used to blop with a rapier on the bridge as point man. The waiting and anticipation to get a blob in and smack some poor ratter was joyous. Succesful blops feeels sooo elite..... And get this, if the AFK cloakies were made to fight or spooked into action, all the boys in system would know when a cloaky came in that a fight was on, instead of having their time wasted with faggotry. It'd make blops even more joyous... You know, turn it from "yawn, again?!" to "LET"S DO THIS!"......
Even better, leave cloaking exactly as it is, and plant AFK cloakies in every single system with a sanctum. All in cyno ships. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
481
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 07:20:00 -
[380] - Quote
SoGǪ even after all those pages, I can't help noticing that still is no explanation why AFK cloakers are supposedly a problem that needs to be solved. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |
|

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 07:24:00 -
[381] - Quote
Tippia wrote:SoGǪ even after all those pages, I can't help noticing that still is no explanation why AFK cloakers are supposedly a problem that needs to be solved.
Dey took our jorbs! |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 07:27:00 -
[382] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:The Apostle wrote: You can't prove it and that's why it's so damned effective for system denial. It simply cannot be countered as a threat.
A low SP cloaky alt can shut down a whole system and he doesn't even need to be awake. If there was an appropriate counter (which is what we're asking for) then it's not an issue.
So wait, what if he's not afk and just generally an insomniac and stays up for days at a time? You sound more like you want to nerf cloaking, is that true? Also whats wrong with all the effective counters proposed in this thread?
WIth my plan if he is serious about being on the PC the whole time all you will have to do is warp away when the warning pops up that you are about to be uncloaked. Then its 15 mins if they care to find your random uncloak point again. Any warp = point reset = skilled active pilot not being seriously affected. |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 07:32:00 -
[383] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:[quote=The Apostle] You can't prove it and that's why it's so damned effective for system denial. It simply cannot be countered as a threat.
A low SP cloaky alt can shut down a whole system and he doesn't even need to be awake. If there was an appropriate counter (which is what we're asking for) then it's not an issue.
So wait, what if he's not afk and just generally an insomniac and stays up for days at a time? You sound more like you want to nerf cloaking, is that true? Also whats wrong with all the effective counters proposed in this thread?
WIth my plan if he is serious about being on the PC the whole time all you will have to do is warp away when the warning pops up that you are about to be uncloaked. Then its 15 mins if they care to find your random uncloak point again. Any warp = point reset = skilled active pilot not being seriously affected.
BTW just in case some folks just dont get it let me quote some parts of the EVE forums rules.
Quote:Ranting is prohibited
A rant is a long-winded, redundant post, often filled with angry, non-constructive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and helpful in the development of the game, but rants are disruptive and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise, clear manner and avoid going off on rambling tangents.
Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another. Text of this nature is not beneficial to the community spirit and will not be tolerated. Corporation, faction and alliance members and other players are cautioned to avoid allowing GÇ£in characterGÇ¥ disputes from becoming "out of character" personal attacks. The game is designed for role-playing and/or portraying a role and it is sometimes easy for tempers to flare when the lines between the virtual world and the real world are crossed. Please keep in-game disputes in the game and off the forum unless it is clearly a mutual, in-character exchange.
Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is the word used to describe a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting the players. Posts of this nature are disruptive and do not contribute to the sense of community we want for our forums.
Just because a topic is in general does NOT give you the right to violate the forums TOS. |

Signal11th
92
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 07:38:00 -
[384] - Quote
Personally although I don't even see a problem with it I would choose Ingvars solution over any of the others.
I went to bed last night and come back to work in the morning and I can't believe that the people moaning about AFK cloaking (4 from what I can see) are still banging on about it compared to the other 100+ post telling them to stop wasting our time.
Just because you moan louder and then when that doesn't work moan even LOUDER doesn't mean anything will get done because the majority of people on the forums are happy with the way it works.
Apply for the CSM on the basis of nerfing cloaking and I'll run for CSM for it to be left alone and I bet you I get more support! Now getting rid of local is a different argument!  God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 08:12:00 -
[385] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote: WIth my plan if he is serious about being on the PC the whole time all you will have to do is warp away when the warning pops up that you are about to be uncloaked. Then its 15 mins if they care to find your random uncloak point again. Any warp = point reset = skilled active pilot not being seriously affected.
What if I don't want to move, what if i simply want to sit and watch a tower and wait for a supercap?
What if in forcing me to warp off and warp back I miss my kill?
Why, so you can be satisfied I'm at my computer??
So your $14.99 has suddenly become more valuable than mine? Maybe I like where I'm sitting, maybe it took me a while to get there.
Until you can actually prove people are AFK you're just making up reasons to change cloaking, all based on your own paranoia.
The Apostle wrote: There are no counters other than to run away or dock up indefinitely. Which is exactly the point.
Who told you that?
Those may be the only 2 counters acceptable to you but they are far from the only 2.
You just choose not to employ them.
In point of fact you yourself cited a counter you personally used once.....
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
BTW just in case some folks just dont get it let me quote some parts of the EVE forums rules. Trolling is prohibited.
Just because a topic is in general does NOT give you the right to violate the forums TOS.
Sorry no, this rule has never been enforced, you aren't special and they won't start now.
What they might do if your lucky is lock this and tell you to move it since you put it in the wrong place.
What they won't do if your lucky is ban you for threatening to put a gun to somebodies head. Violent talk like that is frowned upon.
|

Zendon Taredi
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 08:32:00 -
[386] - Quote
Jesus, these people would never make it in a wormhole. |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 08:35:00 -
[387] - Quote
Stating that I will use the forum report function to report posts that violate the TOS is not holding up a gun to someones head. Saying so is libel. Period.
A warp off to stop the probe process is quick and easy you just have to go off grid and come back. Which ought to take mere seconds. If you miss a kill it is because you have messed up your warp system.
You have to admit it sounds a hell of alot better than random decloaks, Cloak fuel, bay or other methods that will literally leave you unable to cloak or decloak in front of say POS guns. This targets just those who arent around to see the warning pop up. |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 08:36:00 -
[388] - Quote
Zendon Taredi wrote:Jesus, these people would never make it in a wormhole.
Quote:Ranting is prohibited
A rant is a long-winded, redundant post, often filled with angry, non-constructive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and helpful in the development of the game, but rants are disruptive and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise, clear manner and avoid going off on rambling tangents.
Please keep this on topic. |

Baneken
The New Knighthood Apocalypse Now.
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 08:41:00 -
[389] - Quote
Problem isn't cloaking it's hulk costing you 200mils a pop with less defence then your average T1 frigate. If that thing could survive even a BS rat there would be a lot less whining on the issue and removing local solves nothing. It works in WH because you cannot hot drop and you have to actually find your targets first unlike in 0.0 where you immediately can find a good system by just looking at the sov index and call in a drop.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
482
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 08:42:00 -
[390] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Zendon Taredi wrote:Jesus, these people would never make it in a wormhole. Please keep this on topic. He is. You, with increasing frequency, are not.
Quote:Stating that I will use the forum report function to report posts that violate the TOS is not holding up a gun to someones head. Saying so is libel. No it's not.
Quote:A warp off to stop the probe process is quick and easy you just have to go off grid and come back. Which ought to take mere seconds. If you miss a kill it is because you have messed up your warp system. It also interferes with and disrupts active cloaking. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 21 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |