| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
73
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 04:44:00 -
[991] - Quote
pussnheels wrote: i am going to ask again because i didn't got a answer yet WHY AREN'T PEOPLE ALLOWED TO AFK MINE IF THEY WANT? You goons and other nullsec idiots have your AFK moongoo , so that shouldn't be allowed if you continue with your logic
Because they are Goons. What else is there to say. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Ambassador Crane
Hellhound Productions
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 04:48:00 -
[992] - Quote
Wow! Nearly 50 pages now of the same arguments being repeated over and over and over and over and over.........
I actually read through about 30 pages before I got bored reading the same basic moans and groans, just rephrased in a colorful rainbow of wording. The whining flows heavily in this thread from both industrialists and gankers alike, although (and I'm personally not suprised) more so from the ganker side.
But what really tickles me reading through this drudge is when I hear gankers arguing over the numbers game in terms of costs. I mean, lets be real here and admit. Most of those who gank mining ships are not doing it for the easy isk (which it definitely is). No, most of them are doing it purely for the "tears". I mean, lets look at the very name of the corp for the OP. Ahh the shear irony of someone part of a corp focused on collecting tears and yet coming to the forums shedding his own. The changes haven't even been implemented yet and what? Business already so slow you gotta make and collect your own??
Then I 'lol'd at the people who claim that miners have been crying and CCP is "stooping down" to give them a buff. How many times have we heard nullsec pvpers (and yeah, I am one) complain that this or that needs to be buffed or nerfed. Or throw in faction warfare. Or throw in war decs. I say cheers to the miners for finally getting a bit of attention from CCP.
What I also think is comical about most people in this thread is that they claim you should fit a hulk for tanking in High Sec. That people shouldn't be capable of AFK mining. I say until CCP makes mining more interesting (and even the pvpers admit mining is incredibly boring though I doubt many of them have done it for more then perhaps 30mins), can you REALLY blame them for doing it at least semi-afk?? I've mined ore and i'm generally thinking. "omg....I'm so bored! Please ganker shoot me so I can have an excuse to end my miserable existance!" And then I tried mining ice....I think that's when i thankfully learned what ctrl-q (or I guess alt-shft-q now) really did!
So again, I tip my hat to you full time miners in finally getting some much needed love from CCP. In my opinion, it's not really that much but it's certainly well deserved attention. And gankers, before you kill that miner, which I'm sure you'll do even after the changes, be sure to thank that miner for supplying the materials to build that very same ship your about to kill him with. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
122
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 04:51:00 -
[993] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:Imposing large punitive costs removes a large % of players from the 'ganker' pool. Forcing gankers exclusively into large groups of destroyers, cuts down on variety and leads to boring tactics, as well as cutting out those players in odd time zones, or those without a large alliance to back them up.
We could call it natural selection, right? EVE Online is an MMO, not a singleplayer Call of Duty copy. Get your ganker friends and gank in groups. That's how this game is played in nullsec. Teamwork. |

pussnheels
488
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 04:52:00 -
[994] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
As an example I was only ganked once and I was in a retriever at the time. A destroyer took me out. Then he abandoned his wreck, turned it blue. I recovered my wreck and his without even getting a timer on me for looting his wreck. I made out enough to outfit almost two retrievers. He lost far more than I did and yet he still made the choice to do what he did with no input from me at all. He did not even get insurance but I did. This is the kind of players EVE has for the vast majority. You guys making these arguments represent almost nobody else except your selves when you say these things that are completely rediculous statement in the extreme. The vast majority of EVE players are no where near this level of play. They will still do it because it is fun. Even if it is costly.
Errr, you realize that he didn't 'abandon' his wreck, right? Now I'm pretty sure you are nowhere near 'this' level of play, either. You seem to think ganking should only be the province of the idle rich, as if they were out on a pheasant hunt or an exotic safari. I, being a man of the people....believe that the young, the up and coming, should be encouraged to partake in our noble cause.... Imposing large punitive costs removes a large % of players from the 'ganker' pool. Forcing gankers exclusively into large groups of destroyers, cuts down on variety and leads to boring tactics, as well as cutting out those players in odd time zones, or those without a large alliance to back them up. And the insipid requirement that gankers lose more than the target? 1. Gankers will jump at a chance to gank for a profit. 2. And they will often accept a personal loss if they have an opportunity to inflict disproportionate damage to the victim. But they almost NEVER gank when the 'cost to gank' is higher than the total value of the target. Thats why you don't see people ganking, say - Bantams or Retrievers with Tornados. Its just stupid to waste a 70-100M ISK ship to kill something that costs a mere fraction of that. Just as it would be stupid to gank a 120M ISK Skiff with 10 Tornados, or a 180M ISK Mackinaw with 5 or 6? And because gankers are not irrational, these types of ganks do not and will not happen, except in the most exceedingly rare of cases. Its the same reason that people rarely gank Orcas - the effort costs more than the reward - or even the loss to the victim....
you not ganking retrievers and bantams because you know you NOT going to hurt the other player or that the victim is a new player and you might get accused of harrassing new players Your opinion about ganking has nothing to do about profit , only hurting people and if you can hurt them in their RL pockets aswell even better , Don't get me wrong there is nothing wrong with ganking nor do i or most of the players want a risk highsec , but people like you are getting me pissed off IT IS NOT YOUR GAME , game belongs to CCP and when CCP decides to change something you don't like well deal with it get over it , there has been several changes in the past i didn't like , but i am still here deal with it and stop crying I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
428
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 04:56:00 -
[995] - Quote
pussnheels wrote:
i am going to ask again because i didn't got a answer yet WHY AREN'T PEOPLE ALLOWED TO AFK MINE IF THEY WANT? You goons and other nullsec idiots have your AFK moongoo , so that shouldn't be allowed if you continue with your logic
Here's your answer...
You ARE allowed to AFK mine. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1464
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:00:00 -
[996] - Quote
i sat down and looked at some other ships that are of prices comparable to hulks, let's start
a Vigilant costs about the same as a Hulk in Jita and it has more base HP, but inferior resists (being a faction ship) and at all level Vs, unfit, it has 11k EHP. fit for its most common role, dealing HAC-like damage with dual 90% webs, it will only have 20k EHP. a brick tanked heavy tackle fit would increase its EHP to 63k, but it gives up a substantial amount of DPS. also, with dual fed navy webs, its cost goes up to ~400m. add a faction point (which is not uncommon in these ships) and you're looking at close to 500M.
a Devoter isn't much cheaper than a Hulk (difference is like 20M in Jita) and it only has a few thousand more EHP unfit, although this is due to its resist bonus - which is necessary, considering that it tends to be the primary especially when supers are on the field. fit for its primary role, being a brick tanked bubbler, it can field a massive tank - 215k EHP with Damnation bonuses. it also tends to have an entire blob of ships shooting at it.
both of these ships are used in combat and the vigilant's tanking abilities aren't terribly impressive even compared to a hulk. oh and they're generally not AFK in a belt and they're not that great for making ISK. a rogue goon |

Asuka Solo
Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises
1572
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:01:00 -
[997] - Quote
pussnheels wrote: i am going to ask again because i didn't got a answer yet WHY AREN'T PEOPLE ALLOWED TO AFK MINE IF THEY WANT? You goons and other nullsec idiots have your AFK moongoo , so that shouldn't be allowed if you continue with your logic
Bravo.
Down with moongoo botters!
To the statues! |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1225
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:02:00 -
[998] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:Imposing large punitive costs removes a large % of players from the 'ganker' pool. Forcing gankers exclusively into large groups of destroyers, cuts down on variety and leads to boring tactics, as well as cutting out those players in odd time zones, or those without a large alliance to back them up. We could call it natural selection, right? EVE Online is a MMO, not a singleplayer Call of Duty copy. Get your ganker friends and gank in groups. That's how this game is played in nullsec. Teamwork. ~blobbing~ Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
434
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:02:00 -
[999] - Quote
Ambassador Crane wrote:Wow! Nearly 50 pages now of the same arguments being repeated over and over and over and over and over......... I actually read through about 30 pages before I got bored reading the same basic moans and groans, just rephrased in a colorful rainbow of wording. The whining flows heavily in this thread from both industrialists and gankers alike, although (and I'm personally not suprised) more so from the ganker side. But what really tickles me reading through this drudge is when I hear gankers arguing over the numbers game in terms of costs. I mean, lets be real here and admit. Most of those who gank mining ships are not doing it for the easy isk (which it definitely is). No, most of them are doing it purely for the "tears". I mean, lets look at the very name of the corp for the OP. Ahh the shear irony of someone part of a corp focused on collecting tears and yet coming to the forums shedding his own.  The changes haven't even been implemented yet and what? Business already so slow you gotta make and collect your own?? Then I 'lol'd at the people who claim that miners have been crying and CCP is "stooping down" to give them a buff. How many times have we heard nullsec pvpers (and yeah, I am one) complain that this or that needs to be buffed or nerfed. Or throw in faction warfare. Or throw in war decs. I say cheers to the miners for finally getting a bit of attention from CCP. What I also think is comical about most people in this thread is that they claim you should fit a hulk for tanking in High Sec. That people shouldn't be capable of AFK mining. I say until CCP makes mining more interesting (and even the pvpers admit mining is incredibly boring though I doubt many of them have done it for more then perhaps 30mins), can you REALLY blame them for doing it at least semi-afk?? I've mined ore and i'm generally thinking. "omg....I'm so bored! Please ganker shoot me so I can have an excuse to end my miserable existance!" And then I tried mining ice....I think that's when i thankfully learned what ctrl-q (or I guess alt-shft-q now) really did! So again, I tip my hat to you full time miners in finally getting some much needed love from CCP. In my opinion, it's not really that much but it's certainly well deserved attention. And gankers, before you kill that miner, which I'm sure you'll do even after the changes, be sure to thank that miner for supplying the materials to build that very same ship your about to kill him with. The entire point is that miners haven't done anything to earn this buff. As I said earlier an appropriate buff would be purely to the fitting stats of the ships, not their EHP. Buffing the fitting stats would allow them to fit a respectable tank without too much sacrifice to yield, but no, we can't even help miners help themselves, we have to do everything for them! EVE's 4th of July Fireworks |

pussnheels
488
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:03:00 -
[1000] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:pussnheels wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Herr Hammer Draken wrote:Wow what an over statement. let's see crimewatch, which will prevent you from ganking a freighter or an officer-fit faction battleship because otherwise looting it means that anyone can shoot you and bring all the neutral RR they want and you can't shoot at their RR this unnecessary change catering to afk miners who feel entitled to profit while only alt-tabbing from their movie to move ore to their orcas yeah, welcome to a risk-free hisec. a new game enhancement - err, experience! i am going to ask again because i didn't got a answer yet WHY AREN'T PEOPLE ALLOWED TO AFK MINE IF THEY WANT? You goons and other nullsec idiots have your AFK moongoo , so that shouldn't be allowed if you continue with your logic You don't understand moon mining at all if you think it's effortless income. it is effortless once you own the system only thing you need to do is set up a pos start the proces after that it is only a question of refueling and empty the storage bins so don't give me that crap that moongoo is hard work and involves hours upon hours of boring yourself to death watching the lights on your pos well i am pretty pissed off at any of your nullsec wankers , death sick of your comments how people should play your game all the while you cry and whine about anything that has the remote chance of pulling down your own little carebear sandcastle I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1464
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:06:00 -
[1001] - Quote
Asuka Solo wrote:moongoo botters
nobody can be this clueless a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1464
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:06:00 -
[1002] - Quote
pussnheels wrote:it is effortless once you own the system only thing you need to do is set up a pos start the proces after that it is only a question of refueling and empty the storage bins so don't give me that crap that moongoo is hard work and involves hours upon hours of boring yourself to death watching the lights on your pos well i am pretty pissed off at any of your nullsec wankers , death sick of your comments how people should play your game all the while you cry and whine about anything that has the remote chance of pulling down your own little carebear sandcastle
you should ask Pandemic Legion about owning systems that they run moon mining towers in a rogue goon |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
487
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:08:00 -
[1003] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:i sat down and looked at some other ships that are of prices comparable to hulks, let's start
a Vigilant costs about the same as a Hulk in Jita and it has more base HP, but inferior resists (being a faction ship) and at all level Vs, unfit, it has 11k EHP. fit for its most common role, dealing HAC-like damage with dual 90% webs, it will only have 20k EHP. a brick tanked heavy tackle fit would increase its EHP to 63k, but it gives up a substantial amount of DPS. also, with dual fed navy webs, its cost goes up to ~400m. add a faction point (which is not uncommon in these ships) and you're looking at close to 500M.
a Devoter isn't much cheaper than a Hulk (difference is like 20M in Jita) and it only has a few thousand more EHP unfit, although this is due to its resist bonus - which is necessary, considering that it tends to be the primary especially when supers are on the field. fit for its primary role, being a brick tanked bubbler, it can field a massive tank - 215k EHP with Damnation bonuses. it also tends to have an entire blob of ships shooting at it.
both of these ships are used in combat and the vigilant's tanking abilities aren't terribly impressive even compared to a hulk. oh and they're generally not AFK in a belt and they're not that great for making ISK.
i know you are trying to make a point...
what it is i have no clue  Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |

pussnheels
488
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:08:00 -
[1004] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Ambassador Crane wrote:Wow! Nearly 50 pages now of the same arguments being repeated over and over and over and over and over......... I actually read through about 30 pages before I got bored reading the same basic moans and groans, just rephrased in a colorful rainbow of wording. The whining flows heavily in this thread from both industrialists and gankers alike, although (and I'm personally not suprised) more so from the ganker side. But what really tickles me reading through this drudge is when I hear gankers arguing over the numbers game in terms of costs. I mean, lets be real here and admit. Most of those who gank mining ships are not doing it for the easy isk (which it definitely is). No, most of them are doing it purely for the "tears". I mean, lets look at the very name of the corp for the OP. Ahh the shear irony of someone part of a corp focused on collecting tears and yet coming to the forums shedding his own.  The changes haven't even been implemented yet and what? Business already so slow you gotta make and collect your own?? Then I 'lol'd at the people who claim that miners have been crying and CCP is "stooping down" to give them a buff. How many times have we heard nullsec pvpers (and yeah, I am one) complain that this or that needs to be buffed or nerfed. Or throw in faction warfare. Or throw in war decs. I say cheers to the miners for finally getting a bit of attention from CCP. What I also think is comical about most people in this thread is that they claim you should fit a hulk for tanking in High Sec. That people shouldn't be capable of AFK mining. I say until CCP makes mining more interesting (and even the pvpers admit mining is incredibly boring though I doubt many of them have done it for more then perhaps 30mins), can you REALLY blame them for doing it at least semi-afk?? I've mined ore and i'm generally thinking. "omg....I'm so bored! Please ganker shoot me so I can have an excuse to end my miserable existance!" And then I tried mining ice....I think that's when i thankfully learned what ctrl-q (or I guess alt-shft-q now) really did! So again, I tip my hat to you full time miners in finally getting some much needed love from CCP. In my opinion, it's not really that much but it's certainly well deserved attention. And gankers, before you kill that miner, which I'm sure you'll do even after the changes, be sure to thank that miner for supplying the materials to build that very same ship your about to kill him with. The entire point is that miners haven't done anything to earn this buff. As I said earlier an appropriate buff would be purely to the fitting stats of the ships, not their EHP. Buffing the fitting stats would allow them to fit a respectable tank without too much sacrifice to yield, but no, we can't even help miners help themselves, we have to do everything for them!
Do you actually have to do something to earn a buff following your logic nullsec doesn'(t deserve moongoo , only thing they seem to do out there was ratting bots mining with guns ( thank god thats almost over) , exploiting wardec mechanics and other mechanics , crashing the server and whine whine whine about highsec
I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
428
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:10:00 -
[1005] - Quote
pussnheels wrote:
you not ganking retrievers and bantams because you know you NOT going to hurt the other player or that the victim is a new player and you might get accused of harrassing new players Your opinion about ganking has nothing to do about profit , only hurting people and if you can hurt them in their RL pockets aswell even better , Don't get me wrong there is nothing wrong with ganking nor do i or most of the players do not want a risk highsec , but people like you are getting me pissed off IT IS NOT YOUR BLOODY GAME , game belongs to CCP and when CCP decides to change something you don't like well deal with it get over it , there has been several changes in the past i didn't like , but i am still here deal with it and stop crying
Of course, its not worth ganking them because it doesn't inflict any damage on the target. Between cheap hulls and Platinum insurance, you just aren't accomplishing much. I value my time more than that.
Incidentally, its the same reason I don't bother with low sec. Take a hypothetical EVE opponent, "Johnny Jackass".
If I go to lowsec and pop his insured T1-Rupture at Old Man Star, I set him back a few million and he doesn't mind at all. Even if I pod him (and take the large sec hit) his pod is likely a combat clone. Win or lose, its a waste of time. Its like playing poker for toothpicks or M&M's.
If I gank his Hulk in highsec, with a -10 suicide alt - it interferes with his main source income and sets him back hundreds of millions. As Johnny didn't expect to lose his pod in 'safe' space - he's likely loaded with expensive implants. A skilled attack could easily set him back 1 Billion ISK or more. Inflicting that kind of damage is NOT a waste of time my time.
Understand now? I measure my success in how much damage and pain I inflict on other players. Newsflash - so does everybody else. I just don't limit myself to small-fry. |

Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
201
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:12:00 -
[1006] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:The entire point is that miners haven't done anything to earn this buff. As I said earlier an appropriate buff would be purely to the fitting stats of the ships, not their EHP. Buffing the fitting stats would allow them to fit a respectable tank without too much sacrifice to yield, but no, we can't even help miners help themselves, we have to do everything for them!
Your regurgitated rhetoric is terribly played out. As players we don't have the opportunity or ability to "earn buffs". They're given or taken away based on perceived imbalances in the mechanics of the game. CCP decided, and the vast majority of the forum posting populace agrees, that Barges and Exhumers needed to be rebalanced as their current incarnation just plain sucks. Whatever argument you have against this re-balance is, frankly, irrelevant as it's going to happen anyway as you and others in opposition have failed to provide meaningful evidence or sound reasoning to convince CCP to scrap their plans. |

Daemon Ceed
Jihad Squad from Riyadh Reckless Ambition
273
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:14:00 -
[1007] - Quote
As a ganker, I'll give my reasons:
1.) It's HILARIOUS! 2.) Profit
Does there need to be any other reason? Miners are like giant space pinatas. The Sandbox = Play however the hell you want. |

Pipa Porto
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:15:00 -
[1008] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:pussnheels wrote:it is effortless once you own the system only thing you need to do is set up a pos start the proces after that it is only a question of refueling and empty the storage bins so don't give me that crap that moongoo is hard work and involves hours upon hours of boring yourself to death watching the lights on your pos well i am pretty pissed off at any of your nullsec wankers , death sick of your comments how people should play your game all the while you cry and whine about anything that has the remote chance of pulling down your own little carebear sandcastle you should ask Pandemic Legion about owning systems that they run moon mining towers in
Last time I mentioned that PL didn't hold Sov, I was wrong because they had accidentally Sov.
This time I'm checking Dotlan first.
PL, which is one of the largest Tech holders in the game currently holds exactly 0 Sov.
The hard work of Moon Goo is fighting to keep it. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
434
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:16:00 -
[1009] - Quote
pussnheels wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:pussnheels wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Herr Hammer Draken wrote:Wow what an over statement. let's see crimewatch, which will prevent you from ganking a freighter or an officer-fit faction battleship because otherwise looting it means that anyone can shoot you and bring all the neutral RR they want and you can't shoot at their RR this unnecessary change catering to afk miners who feel entitled to profit while only alt-tabbing from their movie to move ore to their orcas yeah, welcome to a risk-free hisec. a new game enhancement - err, experience! i am going to ask again because i didn't got a answer yet WHY AREN'T PEOPLE ALLOWED TO AFK MINE IF THEY WANT? You goons and other nullsec idiots have your AFK moongoo , so that shouldn't be allowed if you continue with your logic You don't understand moon mining at all if you think it's effortless income. it is effortless once you own the system only thing you need to do is set up a pos start the proces after that it is only a question of refueling and empty the storage bins so don't give me that crap that moongoo is hard work and involves hours upon hours of boring yourself to death watching the lights on your pos well i am pretty pissed off at any of your nullsec wankers , death sick of your comments how people should play your game all the while you cry and whine about anything that has the remote chance of pulling down your own little carebear sandcastle You're absolutely right. These towers are invulnerable and never come under attack, and so never need defending with fleets of sometimes more than a hundred players. EVE's 4th of July Fireworks |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1464
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:19:00 -
[1010] - Quote
well, you were able to make towers invulnerable in the past a rogue goon |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
122
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:20:00 -
[1011] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:The hard work of Moon Goo is fighting to keep it.
Not really. Few thousand supercaps / moon should do the trick. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1464
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:21:00 -
[1012] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Not really. Few thousand supercaps / moon should do the trick.
yeah the NC had a ton of supercaps and controlled nearly all of the tech and nobody has been able to challenge them so far
that's why Morsus Mihi, Majesta Empire, Stella Polaris and them still own all of the north a rogue goon |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1714
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:23:00 -
[1013] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:the problem is that in the past, hulkageddons generally involved "more expensive" ships like brutixes, discophoons, torp ravens, armageddons and domis, which were insured so the ganker would only really bear a 10-20m loss
then the nth nerf to all risk in hisec took away insurance for concord kills (since publords need to be safe while botting or being AFK) and people started using the newly buffed destroyers and tier 3 battlecruisers
and now, the n+1st nerf to all risk in hisec is vastly increasing the hitpoints on all barges
and soon, the n+2nd nerf to all risk in hisec will ensure that no freighter is worth ganking because looting it will allow everyone in the game, most of whom had no stake in either the defense or attack on that freighter, to shoot you
and the n+3rd nerf will probably equalize concord response times throughout all of hisec, so a 1.0 rookie system is no safer than a 0.5
Insurance fraud was taken away not because of hi sec kills but because, like boomerang, it started being used in an heavily mass, industrialized way. You can find on MD the guy (Cosmoray) who made 100B+ by manufacturing thousands of battleships and exploding them.
He started a trend, with a NPC endless ISK faucet, he posted about it and how to do it and then nobody would stop what was basically legal ISK duping. CCP intervened and removed it.
Same for boomerang, for years it was used with a brain and not spammed on the forums and CCP let it go. Then a very intelligent guy started talking about it on GD and made tutorials so droves of emulators started doing it. CCP intervened and removed it.
Same for orca ships "saving". Once again, tolerated for a long time till somebody "smart" decided to make it very public and spammable by every ganker. CCP intervened and removed it.
Don't blame hi seccer targets for the grave hi seccer gankers dug by themselves.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
15
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:23:00 -
[1014] - Quote
Didn't think I'd ever agree on this matter with the OP, but this change ist bad. Reasons have been mentioned in this thread.
All it would have taken was a powergrid buff to the hulk, fix the training time issues for covetor and exhumers, remove the procurer from the game and have the mining frigate take it's place.
These changes are stupid indeed. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1714
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:24:00 -
[1015] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Herr Hammer Draken wrote:Wow what an over statement. let's see crimewatch, which will prevent you from ganking a freighter or an officer-fit faction battleship because otherwise looting it means that anyone can shoot you and bring all the neutral RR they want and you can't shoot at their RR this unnecessary change catering to afk miners who feel entitled to profit while only alt-tabbing from their movie to move ore to their orcas yeah, welcome to a risk-free hisec. a new game enhancement - err, experience!
Yes EvE actions will have consequences. How bad, eh? Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1464
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:26:00 -
[1016] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Insurance fraud was taken away not because of hi sec kills but because, like boomerang, it started being used in an heavily mass, industrialized way. You can find on MD the guy (Cosmoray) who made 100B+ by manufacturing thousands of battleships and exploding them.
He started a trend, with a NPC endless ISK faucet, he posted about it and how to do it and then nobody would stop what was basically legal ISK duping. CCP intervened and removed it.
Same for boomerang, for years it was used with a brain and not spammed on the forums and CCP let it go. Then a very intelligent guy started talking about it on GD and made tutorials so droves of emulators started doing it. CCP intervened and removed it.
Same for orca ships "saving". Once again, tolerated for a long time till somebody "smart" decided to make it very public and spammable by every ganker. CCP intervened and removed it.
Don't blame hi seccer targets for the grave hi seccer gankers dug by themselves.
i'm not talking about insurance fraud, which allowed empty ships to be self-destructed at a profit
boomeranging was broken and anybody who disagrees is kinda silly considering that it literally allowed you to suicide gank a freighter with one tornado
orca ship saving is also stupid
i'm not talking about things that are literally borderline exploits, i'm talking about the consistent goalpost moving which is gradually removing all risk from hisec a rogue goon |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1714
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:26:00 -
[1017] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Herr Hammer Draken wrote:Poor choice of words. The ganker is not supposed to be able to profit from killing miners when fitted for their role. They are not war ships never intended to be war ships. But after this change I can see them getting used for some war ship type roles. Again unintended for EVE but then that never stopped most of the posters in this thread. for one, there's no way of enforcing a "minimum" cost to gank something because if it requires the DPS of, say, a vindicator, you can do it with 6 catalysts which come at a fraction of the cost however, I do agree that you shouldn't be able to profitably gank, say, a t2 fit exhumer considering that you can't really profitably gank a t2 fit mission boat, but if you're looking at a mackinaw with, say, aoede MLUs and ore strip miners, then there is no way that you shouldn't be able to gank it for a profit because it's blatantly a loot pinataexhumer ganking wasn't profitable before this, however, because we had to pay out rewards to get dudes to gank exhumers just like a faction/deadspace fit tengu, just like an officer-fit nightmare coming through a gate
Ore items are hundreds of millions, don't tell me that bringing 1 more catalyst to kill the Hulk pinata will break your neck. Or don't tell me that killing a Mack will be impossible. You'll have to use say some Tornados whose cost will still not be "hundreds of millions". Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
122
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:27:00 -
[1018] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:yeah the NC had a ton of supercaps and controlled nearly all of the tech and nobody has been able to challenge them so far
that's why Morsus Mihi, Majesta Empire, Stella Polaris and them still own all of the north
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZDME4zZdMQ
Ship with 10 mid slots?  |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1464
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:29:00 -
[1019] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Herr Hammer Draken wrote:Wow what an over statement. let's see crimewatch, which will prevent you from ganking a freighter or an officer-fit faction battleship because otherwise looting it means that anyone can shoot you and bring all the neutral RR they want and you can't shoot at their RR this unnecessary change catering to afk miners who feel entitled to profit while only alt-tabbing from their movie to move ore to their orcas yeah, welcome to a risk-free hisec. a new game enhancement - err, experience! Yes EvE actions will have consequences. How bad, eh?
so you believe that you should be able to take part in a fight directly and not actually be vulnerable to intervention?
oh and the other aspect of it was that you couldn't shoot back at somebody who is shooting you, lest you be concorded
at least everyone sensible on these forums (and at fanfest) told CCP why that is a goddamn stupid idea a rogue goon |

Travis117
APEX ARDENT COALITION Persona Non Gratis
4
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:29:00 -
[1020] - Quote
Waaa waaaaa were going to have a harder time ganking like the l33t pvpers waaaaaaa. Wanna kill people? Go to lowsec or nullsec |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |