| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1454
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:14:00 -
[631] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:The day every null sec player is not aloud by any means starting by NPC or Alt corporations to have full industrial organisations in high sec, mission corporations, shipping corporations, trading alts, High sec research/invention POS's and more funky stuff, then yep it will be time to change high sec. But as far as every major null alliance has hundreds/thousands of those in high sec and don't stop crying about high sec they will always be laughed at for not being serious for one second.
"let's punish people for playing in nullsec"
get out lmao a rogue goon |

Jed Bobby
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:15:00 -
[632] - Quote
this thread will be all I need to plea insanity |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
481
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:16:00 -
[633] - Quote
so whats the price of a skiff nowadays?
i wanna make a fleet of battle skiffs... (maybe for null sec bait ship)
can someone punch this into EFT and let me know its stats?
low: dcu II nano II
mids: 1 mwd 1 long point 1 shield extender 1 invul
highs: 1 nuet
3 warrior II Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |

Ginseng Jita
PAN-EVE TRADING COMPANY
1674
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:18:00 -
[634] - Quote
Just slapping more EHP is not the answer. All that does is make it easier for players to AFK and bot there way through the game. CCP needs to totally look at barges and exhumers and make them work using existing design parameters and tweaking them as need.
Add a little more PU and CPU, and maybe another rig slot. Then make sure that people wanting to make use of these ships understand that they are industrial ships - not ******* armor clad machines of war. That you as the miner have a choice....either you fit the ship to give it armor to protect it - or you give it better yield capabilities. If you choose to neglect the risk and go for yield...you chose to take the risk - you chose.
Make it quite clear the purpose and use of the ships. If players do not want to listen than it it their fault.
This ideal that mining barges are going to have better yield and armor like a cruiser or BS is - BS. CCP is going to make AFK mining and botting surge like never before. The ones this will hurt are the players that do actually stay at their computers and play the game as intended.
This will also have a huge impact on mineral and ore prices - and make mining even more of a chore than it all ready is. There is a solution - just not the way CCP intends to do it. |

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
413
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:18:00 -
[635] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Yet we are presented with those LOL YOU MUST HAVE 32 K EHP OR YOU PLAY WRONG LOL fittings and they use a MAPC. End of MLU.
In the meanwhile I don't recall EVER having had to fit a MLU in any of my other PvP or PvE ships. And I have loads.
You don't fit MLU's into PvP ships. You fit Gyrostabilizers/TE's. And Nanos.
You balance Tank with Yield and Cargo - just as combat ships balance Tank with Speed and Firepower.
Gank ships are effective because they pile everything onto Firepower - to the exclusion of almost everything else, simply because Tank and Speed are useless vs the godlike CONCORD. Combat ships do not get to pick all three (unless they are Minmatar). 
When a miner gets to pick all three - its no longer balanced. Except this is worse: you aren't even picking them with mods and rigs - they are being handed to you right off of the factory floor.
My reaction when I find miners learning and 'doing it right' is actually quite positive. It means they are playing the game smart and I respect that.
If they warp out. I don't get mad. I think, 'Great - they were paying attention - good for them." When I find a Hulk, clad in a DCII, MSEII and Shield Rigs - I don't cry about it - I respect it, and go looking for another target. (and there is ALWAYS another target....)
I just don't understand why as a group, why these 'intelligent' miners are such an extreme minority.
Is it just blind 'Goon hatred?' Or are these people who lost an Exhumer 3 weeks ago (or 2 years ago in the case of Krixtal Icefluxor) - and rather than learn from it, they just get mad and lose sight of the forest for the trees?
|

Jed Bobby
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:20:00 -
[636] - Quote
this game seems pretty AFK friendly in lots of aspects.
why complain? i wonder how many people still play eve because of the fact that they can progress yet do not have to glue their face to the screen the entire time. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
481
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:21:00 -
[637] - Quote
Ginseng Jita wrote:Just slapping more EHP is not the answer. All that does is make it easier for players to AFK and bot there way through the game. CCP needs to totally look at barges and exhumers and make them work using existing design parameters and tweaking them as need.
Add a little more PU and CPU, and maybe another rig slot. Then make sure that people wanting to make use of these ships understand that they are industrial ships - not ******* armor clad machines of war. That you as the miner have a choice....either you fit the ship to give it armor to protect it - or you give it better yield capabilities. If you choose to neglect the risk and go for yield...you chose to take the risk - you chose.
Make it quite clear the purpose and use of the ships. If players do not want to listen than it it their fault.
This ideal that mining barges are going to have better yield and armor like a cruiser or BS is - BS. CCP is going to make AFK mining and botting surge like never before. The ones this will hurt are the players that do actually stay at their computers and play the game as intended.
This will also have a huge impact on mineral and ore prices - and make mining even more of a chore than it all ready is. There is a solution - just not the way CCP intends to do it.
sandbox...
its obvious you have never been in a fleet of itty v... we once got a carrier to SD due to our tactics...
eveyship in eve is pvp
Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1706
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:22:00 -
[638] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Outside hi sec is where Though Guys PvP is at. GǪand the profit is in highsec. So that's hardly relevant, now is it?
Not miners (or anyone else's) problem you can't find profit outside killing chinkens in hi sec.
I heard some 0.0 alliances like PL and Goons found a secret way to make profits even in the desperate slums of 0.0 sec. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Arvantis Sauril
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:23:00 -
[639] - Quote
Drone 16 wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Arvantis Sauril wrote: I propose a heavy tax on all activity in Hi-Sec. Missions, mining, production, everything. I severely doubt the US gov't and all the powerful corporations in the us would allow me to go mining for gold wherever I wanted somewhere in New Jersey and that if I did find something that I wouldn't immediately be pressured/sued/incarcerated into selling the rights to the land or never going near where I found the gold again. Something needs to sustain these empires and Concord, right? If you want to AFK mine, fine, go ahead, but if you do so in Hi-Sec you should net very little if any profit after huge taxes for doing so in Empire space. It is their asteroid after all.
What happens in real world when one of those pseudo-socialist countries impose the next tax is that capital and big corps move to less stupid countries. See France. See Italy. And more. In the real world the citizens would complain about the pirates making commodities more expensive and the Navy would take action. Don't give me the nonsense that since capsuleers are immortal it wouldn't matter what the Navy did either. Some Navy snipers and a head shot every time a ganker showed his face in a station and gankers would be playing Groundhog Day every day. But we were discussing Eve and not real life...do continue...
Umm...piracy happens everyday. Seizure of physical goods. Kidnapping. These things are very real and as is evidenced by the real world, they are nigh impossible to stop when you consider the size of the oceans. These things also occur on land, everyday. Navy ships can only be in so many places at one time. Space is infinitely vaster.
If a player wants near instant and swift protection and justice from would be pirates and gankers, that should come at a COST. Not be free of charge, included with subscription, please go about your business sir. If there was some "Platinum Concord Protection Plan" bought and sold in Jita, then that's one thing. But there isn't.
|

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
550
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:27:00 -
[640] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:The day every null sec player is not aloud by any means starting by NPC or Alt corporations to have full industrial organisations in high sec, mission corporations, shipping corporations, trading alts, High sec research/invention POS's and more funky stuff, then yep it will be time to change high sec. But as far as every major null alliance has hundreds/thousands of those in high sec and don't stop crying about high sec they will always be laughed at for not being serious for one second. "let's punish people for playing in nullsec"
You're reading backwards, try again and once again try to answer correctly instead of rabble the same old story you're pushing out now for a couple days.
Mining barges and ganking mechanic were clearly not balanced, it's not me who says it but some Dev knowing this game more decently then you or I do, balance will hit and now you'll have to put some effort instead of doing brainless stuff. There's no problem with this, the only problem is your math knowledge and ability to recognise something wrong is going now in the right direction. You used and abused of a badly implemented stuff, they're about to correct it, you should be happy for your game.
And your bot argument you know where you can put it right? -I'm sure Shreegs gets a mad laugh at each post he reads because of this buff we're going to see more bots, jesus how can you guys be that dumb?
brb |

Sarik Olecar
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:28:00 -
[641] - Quote
Anyone else get an honest-to-god real headache from reading this??? I think I need to go outside more... |

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
414
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:29:00 -
[642] - Quote
Sarik Olecar wrote:Also, I'd like to think this thread - which has giving many carebears their first taste of tears - will go on to inspire all sorts of crazy shenanigans as they desperately try to feed the new-found addiction...
What, 'crazy shenanigans' like whining even harder to CCP for more beneficial game mechanic changes and insane EHP buffs?
As an expert in 'tears' - must be some strange new definition of 'harvesting tears' that I am unaware of. I thought that tears were something you earned 'in game', not through the petition process or the forums.... |

JamesCLK
Lone Star Exploration Lone Star Partners
191
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:30:00 -
[643] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote: I just don't understand why as a group, why these 'intelligent' miners are such an extreme minority.
Is it just blind 'Goon hatred?' Or are these people who lost an Exhumer 3 weeks ago (or 2 years ago in the case of Krixtal Icefluxor) - and rather than learn from it, they just get mad and lose sight of the forest for the trees?
'Intelligent' miners don't make forum posts, they aren't very vocal because they have no real need to be (it's a minority of a minority). The rest get mad and lose sight of New Eden for the roids (They are winning at EVE apparently).
These changes - in their initial sisi deployment glory - are very much a load of bull. |

Jed Bobby
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:30:00 -
[644] - Quote
I just harvested like at least 3 tears from your post |

Ginseng Jita
PAN-EVE TRADING COMPANY
1674
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:30:00 -
[645] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:The day every null sec player is not aloud by any means starting by NPC or Alt corporations to have full industrial organisations in high sec, mission corporations, shipping corporations, trading alts, High sec research/invention POS's and more funky stuff, then yep it will be time to change high sec. But as far as every major null alliance has hundreds/thousands of those in high sec and don't stop crying about high sec they will always be laughed at for not being serious for one second. "let's punish people for playing in nullsec" You're reading backwards, try again and once again try to answer correctly instead of rabble the same old story you're pushing out now for a couple days. Mining barges and ganking mechanic were clearly not balanced, it's not me who says it but some Dev knowing this game more decently then you or I do, balance will hit and now you'll have to put some effort instead of doing brainless stuff. There's no problem with this, the only problem is your math knowledge and ability to recognise something wrong is going now in the right direction. You used and abused of a badly implemented stuff, they're about to correct it, you should be happy for your game. And your bot argument you know where you can put it right? -I'm sure Shreegs gets a mad laugh at each post he reads because of this buff we're going to see more bots, jesus how can you guys be that dumb?
Your ideal of balance means you want 0 risk in high-sec so you can AFK mine to your hearts content.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8773
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:32:00 -
[646] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Yet we are presented with those LOL YOU MUST HAVE 32 K EHP OR YOU PLAY WRONG LOL fittings and they use a MAPC. GǪwhich are a response to the GÇ£but it's meaningless, they'll bring moreGÇ¥ argument. It's not something you have to do GÇö it's an escalation in response to their escalation that disproves a completely different myth about the tankability of Hulks.
Quote:Then the answer is the same your ilk has always given to everybody else: adapt or quit. Answer to what? It has nothing to do with what you quoted. In fact, the issues caused by this fundamentally flawed concept of cost-balancing were fundamentally flawed exactly because there was no adaptation to it, and that's why they had to actually fix it by using some real balance measures.
When people tell miners to adapt or quit, it's because there are ways of adapting. The miners generally refuse to and instead argue about cost and other irrelevancies. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1222
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:32:00 -
[647] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:I just don't understand why as a group, why these 'intelligent' miners are such an extreme minority.
Is it just blind 'Goon hatred?' Or are these people who lost an Exhumer 3 weeks ago (or 2 years ago in the case of Krixtal Icefluxor) - and rather than learn from it, they just get mad and lose sight of the forest for the trees? Krixtal Icefluxor... ? Now that's a name you don't see totally all the time. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Drone 16
Law Dogz
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:32:00 -
[648] - Quote
Arvantis Sauril wrote:Drone 16 wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Arvantis Sauril wrote: I propose a heavy tax on all activity in Hi-Sec. Missions, mining, production, everything. I severely doubt the US gov't and all the powerful corporations in the us would allow me to go mining for gold wherever I wanted somewhere in New Jersey and that if I did find something that I wouldn't immediately be pressured/sued/incarcerated into selling the rights to the land or never going near where I found the gold again. Something needs to sustain these empires and Concord, right? If you want to AFK mine, fine, go ahead, but if you do so in Hi-Sec you should net very little if any profit after huge taxes for doing so in Empire space. It is their asteroid after all.
What happens in real world when one of those pseudo-socialist countries impose the next tax is that capital and big corps move to less stupid countries. See France. See Italy. And more. In the real world the citizens would complain about the pirates making commodities more expensive and the Navy would take action. Don't give me the nonsense that since capsuleers are immortal it wouldn't matter what the Navy did either. Some Navy snipers and a head shot every time a ganker showed his face in a station and gankers would be playing Groundhog Day every day. But we were discussing Eve and not real life...do continue... Umm...piracy happens everyday. Seizure of physical goods. Kidnapping. These things are very real and as is evidenced by the real world, they are nigh impossible to stop when you consider the size of the oceans. These things also occur on land, everyday. Navy ships can only be in so many places at one time. Space is infinitely vaster. If a player wants near instant and swift protection and justice from would be pirates and gankers, that should come at a COST. Not be free of charge, included with subscription, please go about your business sir. If there was some "Platinum Concord Protection Plan" bought and sold in Jita, then that's one thing. But there isn't.
Ummm..in real life pirates do what they do to survive. They don't go out in a small boat into the unforgiving ocean and risk a sniper's bullet to the head for the "lulz".
Similarly, suicide ganking should be a means of demonstrating to an individual or organization that you dislike their actions so much that you would literally throw money away just to cause them misery. It should be done for strategic, tactical or retributive considerations not just because you can. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1222
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:34:00 -
[649] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Yet we are presented with those LOL YOU MUST HAVE 32 K EHP OR YOU PLAY WRONG LOL fittings and they use a MAPC. GǪwhich are a response to the GÇ£but it's meaningless, they'll bring moreGÇ¥ argument. It's not something you have to do GÇö it's an escalation in response to their escalation that disproves a completely different myth about the tankability of Hulks. Quote:Then the answer is the same your ilk has always given to everybody else: adapt or quit. Answer to what? It has nothing to do with what you quoted. In fact, the issues caused by this fundamentally flawed concept of cost-balancing were fundamentally flawed exactly because there was no adaptation to it, and that's why they had to actually fix it by using some real balance measures. When people tell miners to adapt or quit, it's because there are ways of adapting. The miners generally refuse to and instead argue about cost and other irrelevancies. We should argue about the cost of supercaps .... at least that makes them rare compared to untanked.badly tanked hulks... Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1706
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:34:00 -
[650] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Yet we are presented with those LOL YOU MUST HAVE 32 K EHP OR YOU PLAY WRONG LOL fittings and they use a MAPC. End of MLU.
In the meanwhile I don't recall EVER having had to fit a MLU in any of my other PvP or PvE ships. And I have loads. yeah no PvP ship needs an MLU because, you see, it's not going anywhere close to an asteroid Sorry I meant MAPC. if you think nobody fits MAPCs on pvp ships you've probably never flown a ship in PvP almost every t1/t2/faction frigate fitting has an MAPC
I had to fit a MAPC on a couple of imposed large scale PvP ships: it was to make them uber for those roles (typically some boosted arty fits). Exhumers? Need a MAPC just to not suck complete balls. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
550
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:34:00 -
[651] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:Sarik Olecar wrote:Also, I'd like to think this thread - which has giving many carebears their first taste of tears - will go on to inspire all sorts of crazy shenanigans as they desperately try to feed the new-found addiction... What, 'crazy shenanigans' like whining even harder to CCP for more beneficial game mechanic changes and insane EHP buffs? As an expert in 'tears' - must be some strange new definition of 'harvesting tears' that I am unaware of. I thought that tears were something you earned 'in game', not through the petition process or the forums.... 
You clearly show yourself as an expert in tears stuff, cry me another river plz?
brb |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1706
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:35:00 -
[652] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Then the answer is the same your ilk has always given to everybody else: adapt or quit. yeah but at least your mining bots can operate in peace :shobon:
I don't have vast 0.0 safe space where to place mining bots and ratting bots like you do. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8773
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:35:00 -
[653] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Exhumers? Need a MAPC just to not suck complete balls. Incorrect.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Tuireann Naari
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:36:00 -
[654] - Quote
What, this again? |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1223
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:36:00 -
[655] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:Sarik Olecar wrote:Also, I'd like to think this thread - which has giving many carebears their first taste of tears - will go on to inspire all sorts of crazy shenanigans as they desperately try to feed the new-found addiction... What, 'crazy shenanigans' like whining even harder to CCP for more beneficial game mechanic changes and insane EHP buffs? As an expert in 'tears' - must be some strange new definition of 'harvesting tears' that I am unaware of. I thought that tears were something you earned 'in game', not through the petition process or the forums....  There's so many forums tears I don't think they're worth much anymore. It's odd. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
551
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:37:00 -
[656] - Quote
Ginseng Jita wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:The day every null sec player is not aloud by any means starting by NPC or Alt corporations to have full industrial organisations in high sec, mission corporations, shipping corporations, trading alts, High sec research/invention POS's and more funky stuff, then yep it will be time to change high sec. But as far as every major null alliance has hundreds/thousands of those in high sec and don't stop crying about high sec they will always be laughed at for not being serious for one second. "let's punish people for playing in nullsec" You're reading backwards, try again and once again try to answer correctly instead of rabble the same old story you're pushing out now for a couple days. Mining barges and ganking mechanic were clearly not balanced, it's not me who says it but some Dev knowing this game more decently then you or I do, balance will hit and now you'll have to put some effort instead of doing brainless stuff. There's no problem with this, the only problem is your math knowledge and ability to recognise something wrong is going now in the right direction. You used and abused of a badly implemented stuff, they're about to correct it, you should be happy for your game. And your bot argument you know where you can put it right? -I'm sure Shreegs gets a mad laugh at each post he reads because of this buff we're going to see more bots, jesus how can you guys be that dumb? Your ideal of balance means you want 0 risk in high-sec so you can AFK mine to your hearts content.
Yet as you claim, you're the one running mining fleets.
And yet as I said several times, I play in null sec and have enough targets over there to have fun but you know, solo in null means always enormous risks witch obviously you don't want to take by staying depleting rocks and ice blocs in high sec.
Just say'in brb |

JamesCLK
Lone Star Exploration Lone Star Partners
191
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:38:00 -
[657] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Exhumers? Need a DCU II just to not suck complete balls. FYP |

DrSmegma
Smegma United Asgard Supplies and Logistics
63
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:39:00 -
[658] - Quote
Can't titans be taken down by frigates btw? Where's the cost efficiency? I don't really want to troll you. If I trolled you anyway, I'll probably edit it out as soon as the rage fades. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1707
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:39:00 -
[659] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Yesterday in Sirseshin, several times. a tornado is a pretty expensive way to kill a hulk it seems that you're angry because hulks are able to die in hisec???????
I am not angry, you seem to be a lot, though.
I have all the exhumers and all their mods BPCs or BPOs for invention AND Tornado BPOs AND destroyers BPOs.
So for what I care they can swing the nerf bat wherever they want I will still make money of the chumps who kill each other.
What I find tasty is the hypocrisy exposed, the though guys who are out to Reform EvE now crying orders of magnitude than the 4-5 idiot miners who create a cry thread a month. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Haquer
Vorkuta Inc Goonswarm Federation
107
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:41:00 -
[660] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Tippia wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Yet we are presented with those LOL YOU MUST HAVE 32 K EHP OR YOU PLAY WRONG LOL fittings and they use a MAPC. GǪwhich are a response to the GÇ£but it's meaningless, they'll bring moreGÇ¥ argument. It's not something you have to do GÇö it's an escalation in response to their escalation that disproves a completely different myth about the tankability of Hulks. Quote:Then the answer is the same your ilk has always given to everybody else: adapt or quit. Answer to what? It has nothing to do with what you quoted. In fact, the issues caused by this fundamentally flawed concept of cost-balancing were fundamentally flawed exactly because there was no adaptation to it, and that's why they had to actually fix it by using some real balance measures. When people tell miners to adapt or quit, it's because there are ways of adapting. The miners generally refuse to and instead argue about cost and other irrelevancies. We should argue about the cost of supercaps .... at least that makes them rare compared to untanked.badly tanked hulks...
The best thing about the barge/exhumer changes is that low end minerals are going to be hilariously low meaning for hilariously cheap supers.
I can't ******* wait :3 |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 119 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |