You forgot Lokis and Tengus!

okay go show me that mythical 100k ehp drake that does 500 dps and has a 100k ehp tank and 80% resists across the board while having a web and point

This will happen the day you show me that mythical 30k EHP Mack that got 10k cargo size and mines like a pro.

On an unrelated note, since you guys preach how this is a TEAM GAME then why would a Drake in your blobfest have to fit point and web? Don't you bring in flocks of Rifters for that?

No, because there are many ways to scan ships without anyone knowing they've been scanned.
Good gankers will rarely let you know anything beyond that they are in local.

Here's another tip for you, since you seem to be quite ignorant about ganking mechanics.

Decloaking to scan an Exhumer is rarely even necessary, after you've scanned hundreds of them....

All you need to do is LOOK at the Hulk/Mack, and what it is doing.

Glad to see Tech went where I suggested it'd do, while you were cleaning your butt with them, eh?

also lmao at "mackinaws can't fit tanks"

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16196592/Mackinaw%20-%20New%20Setup%202.jpg

32k ehp against blasters

the link does not work...

yes, we have other tackling ships so that mainline fleet ships don't have to give up midslots for tackle

how that is relevant in a discussion of "ships have to give up tank or utility to increase damage/mining/whatever yield" is beyond me

also I never said that any mining ship anywhere can fit a tank and still get maximum yield, I said that they give up yield for it

that is somehow a problem in eve online, a game of tradeoffs

No, because there are many ways to scan ships without anyone knowing they've been scanned.
Good gankers will rarely let you know anything beyond that they are in local.

i mean let's make it clear how much you just proved your system is nonsense

you make a prediction based on what we will charitably call interpreting the market graph

a change happens that changes the price of tech in a way that cannot be linked to the market graph in any way

you posit this proves your market graph interpretation was correct

No, the problem is when tradeoffs for categories of ships are smoothly selectable and still let them fill their role. I would flat out refuse to fly a minmatar ship without a single gyrostab (unless it was pure bait, you know all ships except miners are nicely multi-role and some even multi-tanking philosophy).

On the opposite side there's mining ships who can't fit the corresponding booster (what in a combat ship is gyrostab / BCU etc) without such harsh drop in tank that makes them crap. Too much black and white.

So, a tradeoff among the tradeoffs has to be found.

okay, http://i.imgur.com/aBuDj.jpg

also lmao at "mackinaws can't fit tanks"

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16196592/Mackinaw%20-%20New%20Setup%202.jpg

32k ehp against blasters

i'm not sure if you're intelligent enough to grasp what i'm saying even boiled down that far:

since there is literally no way your "system" could have actually predicted the result, yet you took credit anyway, it is clear beyond a shadow of a doubt your system is nonsense and you simply take credit whenever one of your coinflips happens to be correct, while burying the incorrect predictions

fit doesn't work with t2 high slots.

Exotic implants check

Link one incorrect prediction. Which happen of course, since nobody is infallible.

you claimed you predicted current tech prices

q.e.d.

All V skills requirement check (it's usually the first sign it's a troll).
Exotic implants check
FC with Tengu booster check
Additional fleet Orca boost check
Abysmal mining capability check

really?

like I said, YOU SACRIFICE YIELD

is that a difficult concept for you?

and of course it works with t2 highslots, you only need to get a CPU hardwiring

I warned you that if you did not deal with your own cartel the prices would tank to 130k.
They did. Period. They would do with or without CCP adding alchemy too. All the high IQ voodoo you needed to use was to draw a straight diagonal line across the in game price chart.