Monitor this thread via RSS [?]
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 38 :: one page
Author Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
j0sephine
j0sephine
Caldari
Reikoku
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:19:00 - [631]

Edited by: j0sephine on 26/08/2005 14:20:29

"Id like to see gank maller and gank moa results (..)"

Dunno what gank moa really be, to be honest... you can mount 4x 250mm rails on her with 4 damage mods, but that leaves launcher slots empty (not enough grid left) ... with all tech.2 gear she'd do ~196 raw dps then. If you drop a damage mod for RCU to install the launchers, the overall DoT might go up to ~210 dps... but that'll leave you with some 40 grid even with maxed out skills, to use for all the lows (didn't check the cpu, might get tight too)
Toshiro Khan
Toshiro Khan

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:20:00 - [632]

Whats with all the people ignoring those saying that its the plate thats the problem, not the drone bay.

Even the rax pilot from that vid, says that its the plate that overpowers the rax. Everyone i know who PvP's says kill the drones you kill the rax.. and some of those are rax pilots.
Toshiro Khan
Toshiro Khan
Gallente

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:20:00 - [633]

Whats with all the people ignoring those saying that its the plate thats the problem, not the drone bay.

Even the rax pilot from that vid, says that its the plate that overpowers the rax. Everyone i know who PvP's says kill the drones you kill the rax.. and some of those are rax pilots.
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:23:00 - [634]

Originally by: Toshiro Khan
Whats with all the people ignoring those saying that its the plate thats the problem, not the drone bay.
Honestly dude, i proved that point so nicely it could be a theorem. What you said wasn't ever proved, at any rate. Hint: see 6 posts above.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.
---
I have the scientific evidence that some people can write but cannot read.
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy
Chronics of ordinary hate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:23:00 - [635]

Originally by: Toshiro Khan
Whats with all the people ignoring those saying that its the plate thats the problem, not the drone bay.
Honestly dude, i proved that point so nicely it could be a theorem. What you said wasn't ever proved, at any rate. Hint: see 6 posts above.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.

In Rust We Trust
j0sephine
j0sephine

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:27:00 - [636]

Edited by: j0sephine on 26/08/2005 14:28:08

"Everyone i know who PvP's says kill the drones you kill the rax.. and some of those are rax pilots."

Unless you're flying a plated maller, you have ~30-40 seconds to lock on and kill the drones (rough equivalent of 8 frigates) because past that time you're dead. Even if you manage to pull it off, by then you're so far out of hp even Thorax' small guns can finish you off.

Before the plate got popular, if you were in something smaller than battleship the only hope of survival was to focus all the fire on the Thorax herself and hope she pops before you do, rendering the drones dead. With the 1600mm plate in, this is simply no longer possible hence the Thorax currently enjoying her /iddqd mode against most of ships that's supposed to be her counterparts... -.o
j0sephine
j0sephine
Caldari
Reikoku
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:27:00 - [637]

Edited by: j0sephine on 26/08/2005 14:28:08

"Everyone i know who PvP's says kill the drones you kill the rax.. and some of those are rax pilots."

Unless you're flying a plated maller, you have ~30-40 seconds to lock on and kill the drones (rough equivalent of 8 frigates) because past that time you're dead. Even if you manage to pull it off, by then you're so far out of hp even Thorax' small guns can finish you off.

Before the plate got popular, if you were in something smaller than battleship the only hope of survival was to focus all the fire on the Thorax herself and hope she pops before you do, rendering the drones dead. With the 1600mm plate in, this is simply no longer possible hence the Thorax currently enjoying her /iddqd mode against most of ships that's supposed to be her counterparts... -.o
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:29:00 - [638]

Originally by: j0sephine
Edited by: j0sephine on 26/08/2005 14:20:29

"Id like to see gank maller and gank moa results (..)"

Dunno what gank moa really be, to be honest... you can mount 4x 250mm rails on her with 4 damage mods, but that leaves launcher slots empty (not enough grid left) ... with all tech.2 gear she'd do ~196 raw dps then. If you drop a damage mod for RCU to install the launchers, the overall DoT might go up to ~210 dps... but that'll leave you with some 40 grid even with maxed out skills, to use for all the lows (didn't check the cpu, might get tight too)


I was thinking about 4 * 200mm t2, 4 damage mods and worthless launchers at the cost of training advanced weapon upgrade to high level. No idea if it would be better (dps wise) than what you get though.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.
---
I have the scientific evidence that some people can write but cannot read.
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy
Chronics of ordinary hate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:29:00 - [639]

Originally by: j0sephine
Edited by: j0sephine on 26/08/2005 14:20:29

"Id like to see gank maller and gank moa results (..)"

Dunno what gank moa really be, to be honest... you can mount 4x 250mm rails on her with 4 damage mods, but that leaves launcher slots empty (not enough grid left) ... with all tech.2 gear she'd do ~196 raw dps then. If you drop a damage mod for RCU to install the launchers, the overall DoT might go up to ~210 dps... but that'll leave you with some 40 grid even with maxed out skills, to use for all the lows (didn't check the cpu, might get tight too)


I was thinking about 4 * 200mm t2, 4 damage mods and worthless launchers at the cost of training advanced weapon upgrade to high level. No idea if it would be better (dps wise) than what you get though.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.

In Rust We Trust
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:30:00 - [640]

Edited by: Naughty Boy on 26/08/2005 14:35:41
Edited by: Naughty Boy on 26/08/2005 14:31:43
Originally by: j0sephine
Edited by: j0sephine on 26/08/2005 14:28:08

"Everyone i know who PvP's says kill the drones you kill the rax.. and some of those are rax pilots."

Unless you're flying a plated maller, you have ~30-40 seconds to lock on and kill the drones (rough equivalent of 8 frigates) because past that time you're dead. Even if you manage to pull it off, by then you're so far out of hp even Thorax' small guns can finish you off.

Before the plate got popular, if you were in something smaller than battleship the only hope of survival was to focus all the fire on the Thorax herself and hope she pops before you do, rendering the drones dead. With the 1600mm plate in, this is simply no longer possible hence the Thorax currently enjoying her /iddqd mode against most of ships that's supposed to be her counterparts... -.o


And that is exactly why there is not hope whatsoever to defeat a tanked thorax in any close range cruiser in a world without plates. The close range thorax will die to any long range gank fitting, and kill other close range cruisers. Hence, nobody will ever fit a cruiser for close range except to fight other classes. Most cruiser cannot catch frigs, and cannot be a threat to BS without a plate, hence cruisers are ruled out of the game. Then we go play WOW and ask Blizzard for bigger helmets.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.
---
I have the scientific evidence that some people can write but cannot read.
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:30:00 - [641]

If you nerf the 1600 plates it will be even worse:


  • All cruisers and most hacs will lose ability to go for HP tank (I assume large shield ext are nerfed witht the plates). Which will practicaly cut the number of setups in half

  • All cruisers wont fit frig guns, because they have unused grid and low HP, so they will always fit med guns. What we know about med guns? That they are not good. They can't hit small targets, they have very limited range for close combat and at long range bs totaly owns in a gunfight. Yet med guns take so much grid that if you go with them cruiser has nothing left to play with

  • Cruisers wont be able to take hits, because cruiser active tanking sucks. So the only cruiser setup will be gank.

  • Cruiser which is fitted with med guns, has no tanking worth very little. Frig size will orbit and laugh, if ceptor engages it will blow up such cruiser before taking any damage if any, because you can dive under med guns tracking way before it locks you. And remember that med guns have 10 times less tracking. 10 times.

  • BS will be able to take out low HP cruiser in a volley at ranges beyond med guns, at close ranges it will take only 1 web to hit the cruiser with large guns. And in a world of fast lock bs like we have now cruisers will suck vs bs.



My point is that cruisers fit bs extenders and plates because its the only way to be usable. Both because med guns give no advantages taking all fitting and native HP with the cruiser active tanking in most situations is not enough to do anything but ganking before you take any fire, because if you do, no matter who shoots you you are dead.




Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:30:00 - [642]

If you nerf the 1600 plates it will be even worse:


  • All cruisers and most hacs will lose ability to go for HP tank (I assume large shield ext are nerfed witht the plates). Which will practicaly cut the number of setups in half

  • All cruisers wont fit frig guns, because they have unused grid and low HP, so they will always fit med guns. What we know about med guns? That they are not good. They can't hit small targets, they have very limited range for close combat and at long range bs totaly owns in a gunfight. Yet med guns take so much grid that if you go with them cruiser has nothing left to play with

  • Cruisers wont be able to take hits, because cruiser active tanking sucks. So the only cruiser setup will be gank.

  • Cruiser which is fitted with med guns, has no tanking worth very little. Frig size will orbit and laugh, if ceptor engages it will blow up such cruiser before taking any damage if any, because you can dive under med guns tracking way before it locks you. And remember that med guns have 10 times less tracking. 10 times.

  • BS will be able to take out low HP cruiser in a volley at ranges beyond med guns, at close ranges it will take only 1 web to hit the cruiser with large guns. And in a world of fast lock bs like we have now cruisers will suck vs bs.



My point is that cruisers fit bs extenders and plates because its the only way to be usable. Both because med guns give no advantages taking all fitting and native HP with the cruiser active tanking in most situations is not enough to do anything but ganking before you take any fire, because if you do, no matter who shoots you you are dead.




Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy
Chronics of ordinary hate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:30:00 - [643]

Edited by: Naughty Boy on 26/08/2005 14:37:25
Edit: Nevermind. Aborted joke.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.

In Rust We Trust
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:36:00 - [644]

PS
About firing on drones to fight rax. Yeah sure, take your time. But if you fire with guns on drones keep in mind that 8x450 HP of a drones is 3600 HP. Drones are small and fast hard to hit, hard to lock due to a lot of clicking. At the same time, thorax itself can do with guns half of the total damage. So what you gonna do? Provide 3.5k damage on thorax or try to shoot down drones?

The problem is that med smb is totaly sucks against heavy drones. Obviously because heavy drones are designed to be bs weapon and large smb to be conter weapon against it. Med smb is designed against med drones, but who uses med drones then heavies can hit most of the targets and provide more damage having MORE HP.

PS
And what they did with the ecm burst? What the hell they did that for?
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:36:00 - [645]

Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 26/08/2005 14:38:08
PS
About firing on drones to fight rax. Yeah sure, take your time. But if you fire with guns on drones keep in mind that 8x450 HP of a drones is 3600 HP. Drones are small and fast hard to hit, hard to lock due to a lot of clicking. At the same time, thorax itself can do with guns half of the total damage. So what you gonna do? Provide 3.5k damage on thorax or try to shoot down drones?

The problem is that med smb totaly sucks against heavy drones. Obviously because heavy drones are designed to be bs weapon and large smb to be conter weapon against them. Med smb is designed against med drones, but who uses med drones then heavies can hit most of the targets and provide more damage having MORE HP.

PS
And what they did with the ecm burst? What the hell they did that for?
Caeden Nicomachean
Caeden Nicomachean

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:37:00 - [646]

Quote:

The comparison above is 4 720mm t2 VS 5 200mm t2 at 15000-17000m, 4 damage mod t2 each.



I thought the rupture had six high slots? If 4 720s/heavys arent able to be fit, bring it down to 650s.

It sounds much like many folks here will veto *any* drone bay at 200 on a cruiser. I think you could remove 3 highslots on the thorax, or move the space to the vexor and you'd still have this from some. Suggest you get some compromise sorta mindset, or these threads will continue for eons.

As that video showed us - a big part of the issue comes from not shooting the drones. That doesn't get factored into the equations.

The issue to me is that the thorax has the *ability* to gank with med guns along with the drones - though with plates in vogue people aren't gonna do that very often. I've come around to the idea of swapping drone bays on the vexor and thorax...but leaving the eve universe devoid of a cruiser with 200?

No. Sorry.


j0sephine
j0sephine

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:37:00 - [647]

"I was thinking about 4 * 200mm t2, 4 damage mods and worthless launchers at the cost of training advanced weapon upgrade to high level. No idea if it would be better (dps wise) than what you get though."

Ahh, i see... at first glance it looks like it'd be possible to get ~230 raw dps out of similar setup (4x 200mm tech.2 rail, 2x tech.2 heavy launchers) ... but that's with antimatter ammo, and i didn't actually check if it's possible to cram all this in Moa's powergrid ^^
j0sephine
j0sephine
Caldari
Reikoku
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:37:00 - [648]

"I was thinking about 4 * 200mm t2, 4 damage mods and worthless launchers at the cost of training advanced weapon upgrade to high level. No idea if it would be better (dps wise) than what you get though."

Ahh, i see... at first glance it looks like it'd be possible to get ~230 raw dps out of similar setup (4x 200mm tech.2 rail, 2x tech.2 heavy launchers) ... but that's with antimatter ammo, and i didn't actually check if it's possible to cram all this in Moa's powergrid ^^
Caeden Nicomachean
Caeden Nicomachean
The Older Gamers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:37:00 - [649]

Quote:

The comparison above is 4 720mm t2 VS 5 200mm t2 at 15000-17000m, 4 damage mod t2 each.



I thought the rupture had six high slots? If 4 720s/heavys arent able to be fit, bring it down to 650s.

It sounds much like many folks here will veto *any* drone bay at 200 on a cruiser. I think you could remove 3 highslots on the thorax, or move the space to the vexor and you'd still have this from some. Suggest you get some compromise sorta mindset, or these threads will continue for eons.

As that video showed us - a big part of the issue comes from not shooting the drones. That doesn't get factored into the equations.

The issue to me is that the thorax has the *ability* to gank with med guns along with the drones - though with plates in vogue people aren't gonna do that very often. I've come around to the idea of swapping drone bays on the vexor and thorax...but leaving the eve universe devoid of a cruiser with 200?

No. Sorry.

---
25 or over? Join www.theoldergamers.com
Tennotsukai
Tennotsukai

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:42:00 - [650]

Originally by: Naughty Boy
Edited by: Naughty Boy on 26/08/2005 14:35:41
Edited by: Naughty Boy on 26/08/2005 14:31:43
Originally by: j0sephine
Edited by: j0sephine on 26/08/2005 14:28:08

"Everyone i know who PvP's says kill the drones you kill the rax.. and some of those are rax pilots."

Unless you're flying a plated maller, you have ~30-40 seconds to lock on and kill the drones (rough equivalent of 8 frigates) because past that time you're dead. Even if you manage to pull it off, by then you're so far out of hp even Thorax' small guns can finish you off.

Before the plate got popular, if you were in something smaller than battleship the only hope of survival was to focus all the fire on the Thorax herself and hope she pops before you do, rendering the drones dead. With the 1600mm plate in, this is simply no longer possible hence the Thorax currently enjoying her /iddqd mode against most of ships that's supposed to be her counterparts... -.o


And that is exactly why there is not hope whatsoever to defeat a tanked thorax in any close range cruiser in a world without plates. The close range thorax will die to any long range gank fitting, and kill other close range cruisers. Hence, nobody will ever fit a cruiser for close range except to fight other classes. Most cruiser cannot catch frigs, and cannot be a threat to BS without a plate, hence cruisers are ruled out of the game. Then we go play WOW and ask Blizzard for bigger helmets.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.


So, the problem is in fact the plate and not the drone bay of the rax?
But because people don't want to lose their extra 3k of armour, they instead want to nerf the rax.
Sorry, but those who are saying that the drone bay isn't the problem, its the plate are looking to be right. The whole argument shouldn't be about the rax being uber because of its drones.. its in fact the rax is uber because of the 1600mm plate.


"scotty, i need more power to warp out."

"i canna give yer any more captain, the dilithium crystal was nerfed this morning.. yer just gonna have ta face it, we've been ganked."
Tennotsukai
Tennotsukai
Minmatar
Sharks With Frickin' Laser Beams
Mercenary Coalition

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:42:00 - [651]

Originally by: Naughty Boy
Edited by: Naughty Boy on 26/08/2005 14:35:41
Edited by: Naughty Boy on 26/08/2005 14:31:43
Originally by: j0sephine
Edited by: j0sephine on 26/08/2005 14:28:08

"Everyone i know who PvP's says kill the drones you kill the rax.. and some of those are rax pilots."

Unless you're flying a plated maller, you have ~30-40 seconds to lock on and kill the drones (rough equivalent of 8 frigates) because past that time you're dead. Even if you manage to pull it off, by then you're so far out of hp even Thorax' small guns can finish you off.

Before the plate got popular, if you were in something smaller than battleship the only hope of survival was to focus all the fire on the Thorax herself and hope she pops before you do, rendering the drones dead. With the 1600mm plate in, this is simply no longer possible hence the Thorax currently enjoying her /iddqd mode against most of ships that's supposed to be her counterparts... -.o


And that is exactly why there is not hope whatsoever to defeat a tanked thorax in any close range cruiser in a world without plates. The close range thorax will die to any long range gank fitting, and kill other close range cruisers. Hence, nobody will ever fit a cruiser for close range except to fight other classes. Most cruiser cannot catch frigs, and cannot be a threat to BS without a plate, hence cruisers are ruled out of the game. Then we go play WOW and ask Blizzard for bigger helmets.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.


So, the problem is in fact the plate and not the drone bay of the rax?
But because people don't want to lose their extra 3k of armour, they instead want to nerf the rax.
Sorry, but those who are saying that the drone bay isn't the problem, its the plate are looking to be right. The whole argument shouldn't be about the rax being uber because of its drones.. its in fact the rax is uber because of the 1600mm plate.

Kaylana Syi
Kaylana Syi

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:45:00 - [652]

Originally by: Toshiro Khan
Whats with all the people ignoring those saying that its the plate thats the problem, not the drone bay.

Even the rax pilot from that vid, says that its the plate that overpowers the rax. Everyone i know who PvP's says kill the drones you kill the rax.. and some of those are rax pilots.


Noone here is saying Plates Aren't A Problem they just aren't THIS problem. We need to bring the Thorax out of HAC land damage wise before we cascade a change to ALL cruisers that will still leave the PROBLEM this whole thread has proven time and time again. Nerfing Plates without boosting cruisers is going to break something you DO NOT WANT broken at this point in time... close range cruiser battles across the board. Its just you know... some other pilots besides Rax Pilots would like to get into all the fun... because they watch on the side line while Thorax pget into the fun without their counterpart pwning them right and left unjustly.
jide's oBject eXplorer
The Nest
Kaylana Syi
Kaylana Syi
Minmatar
The Nest
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:45:00 - [653]

Edited by: Kaylana Syi on 26/08/2005 14:50:06
Originally by: Toshiro Khan
Whats with all the people ignoring those saying that its the plate thats the problem, not the drone bay.

Even the rax pilot from that vid, says that its the plate that overpowers the rax. Everyone i know who PvP's says kill the drones you kill the rax.. and some of those are rax pilots.


Noone here is saying Plates Aren't A Problem they just aren't THIS problem. We need to bring the Thorax out of HAC land damage wise before we cascade a change to ALL cruisers that will still leave the PROBLEM this whole thread has proven time and time again. Nerfing Plates without boosting cruisers is going to break something you DO NOT WANT broken at this point in time... close range cruiser battles across the board. Its just you know... some other pilots besides Rax Pilots would like to get into all the fun... because they watch on the side line while Thorax get into the fun without their counterpart coming even close to useful.

Team Minmatar
Carriers need Clone Vats
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:51:00 - [654]

Originally by: Caeden Nicomachean
I thought the rupture had six high slots? If 4 720s/heavys arent able to be fit, bring it down to 650s.
You cannot outdamage 4 720 t2 & 4 damage mods t2 with any amount of 650mm + heavy launchers, and i am not even sure that rupture with 4 720 t2 & 4 damage mods t2 + RCU 2 can fit 2 rocket launchers in the spare high slots.

Originally by: Caeden Nicomachean
It sounds much like many folks here will veto *any* drone bay at 200 on a cruiser. I think you could remove 3 highslots on the thorax, or move the space to the vexor and you'd still have this from some. Suggest you get some compromise sorta mindset, or these threads will continue for eons.
No. There is just a need for people to acknowledge this simple logic:

* remove the plates, keep the drone bay:
Tanking becomes useless against, back to ganking area. Blaster range is doomed, navigation is useless as when you are moving, you are not doing damage and you die. The heavy drones are useless for a thorax that will die in 20 seconds, when getting hammered from outside 15km. Thorax is doomed, and that's with its drone bay untouched.

* keep the plates, remove the drone bay:
The blaster-thorax becomes viable and desirableagain as it has to fit blasters to be a close range boat (needing damage and not able to rely only on the drone bay). Plate setup still beat gank setup, which mean longer and more enjoyable fight. Thorax can still heavily outdamage any cruiser at close range and even break a dual rep apoc tank alone.

Originally by: Caeden Nicomachean
As that video showed us - a big part of the issue comes from not shooting the drones. That doesn't get factored into the equations.


If you remove the plates, no close range cruiser will ever be able to shoot 8 heavy drones, do you understand that ? Close range thorax in a plate-free world will beat any close range cruiser. incidentally, it will die to gank setups, as every other close range cruiser. We will only see cruisers in mid range gank setup.

I *think* that you didn't factor in the equation that other cruisers *also* would lose the plate. Ok ?

Originally by: Caeden Nicomachean
The issue to me is that the thorax has the *ability* to gank with med guns along with the drones - though with plates in vogue people aren't gonna do that very often. I've come around to the idea of swapping drone bays on the vexor and thorax...but leaving the eve universe devoid of a cruiser with 200?


As i showed in another post at your request, swapping the vexor and the thorax drone bay will make the vexor bonus useless and the thorax will lose around 25% of its drone damage, which isn't very much (but still something).

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.
---
I have the scientific evidence that some people can write but cannot read.
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy
Chronics of ordinary hate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:51:00 - [655]

Originally by: Caeden Nicomachean
I thought the rupture had six high slots? If 4 720s/heavys arent able to be fit, bring it down to 650s.
You cannot outdamage 4 720 t2 & 4 damage mods t2 with any amount of 650mm + heavy launchers, and i am not even sure that rupture with 4 720 t2 & 4 damage mods t2 + RCU 2 can fit 2 rocket launchers in the spare high slots.

Originally by: Caeden Nicomachean
It sounds much like many folks here will veto *any* drone bay at 200 on a cruiser. I think you could remove 3 highslots on the thorax, or move the space to the vexor and you'd still have this from some. Suggest you get some compromise sorta mindset, or these threads will continue for eons.
No. There is just a need for people to acknowledge this simple logic:

* remove the plates, keep the drone bay:
Tanking becomes useless against, back to ganking area. Blaster range is doomed, navigation is useless as when you are moving, you are not doing damage and you die. The heavy drones are useless for a thorax that will die in 20 seconds, when getting hammered from outside 15km. Thorax is doomed, and that's with its drone bay untouched.

* keep the plates, remove the drone bay:
The blaster-thorax becomes viable and desirableagain as it has to fit blasters to be a close range boat (needing damage and not able to rely only on the drone bay). Plate setup still beat gank setup, which mean longer and more enjoyable fight. Thorax can still heavily outdamage any cruiser at close range and even break a dual rep apoc tank alone.

Originally by: Caeden Nicomachean
As that video showed us - a big part of the issue comes from not shooting the drones. That doesn't get factored into the equations.


If you remove the plates, no close range cruiser will ever be able to shoot 8 heavy drones, do you understand that ? Close range thorax in a plate-free world will beat any close range cruiser. incidentally, it will die to gank setups, as every other close range cruiser. We will only see cruisers in mid range gank setup.

I *think* that you didn't factor in the equation that other cruisers *also* would lose the plate. Ok ?

Originally by: Caeden Nicomachean
The issue to me is that the thorax has the *ability* to gank with med guns along with the drones - though with plates in vogue people aren't gonna do that very often. I've come around to the idea of swapping drone bays on the vexor and thorax...but leaving the eve universe devoid of a cruiser with 200?


As i showed in another post at your request, swapping the vexor and the thorax drone bay will make the vexor bonus useless and the thorax will lose around 25% of its drone damage, which isn't very much (but still something).

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.

In Rust We Trust
Toshiro Khan
Toshiro Khan

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:56:00 - [656]

Originally by: Kaylana Syi


Noone here is saying Plates Aren't A Problem they just aren't THIS problem. We need to bring the Thorax out of HAC land damage wise before we cascade a change to ALL cruisers that will still leave the PROBLEM this whole thread has proven time and time again. Nerfing Plates without boosting cruisers is going to break something you DO NOT WANT broken at this point in time... close range cruiser battles across the board. Its just you know... some other pilots besides Rax Pilots would like to get into all the fun... because they watch on the side line while Thorax pget into the fun without their counterpart pwning them right and left unjustly.


But isn't that there the problem? being as 1600mm plate is for battleships and not cruisers. But because some bright spark had the idea of fitting it by using small guns the ball game changed.

If you remove the plate, the rax loses its megatank.. and since the damage isn't insta damage like that of a gank-a-geddon (drone flight time.. etc) plus the rax because vunrable on its way to its target it levels things out.


Toshiro Khan
Toshiro Khan
Gallente

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:56:00 - [657]

Originally by: Kaylana Syi


Noone here is saying Plates Aren't A Problem they just aren't THIS problem. We need to bring the Thorax out of HAC land damage wise before we cascade a change to ALL cruisers that will still leave the PROBLEM this whole thread has proven time and time again. Nerfing Plates without boosting cruisers is going to break something you DO NOT WANT broken at this point in time... close range cruiser battles across the board. Its just you know... some other pilots besides Rax Pilots would like to get into all the fun... because they watch on the side line while Thorax pget into the fun without their counterpart pwning them right and left unjustly.


But isn't that there the problem? being as 1600mm plate is for battleships and not cruisers. But because some bright spark had the idea of fitting it by using small guns the ball game changed.

If you remove the plate, the rax loses its megatank.. and since the damage isn't insta damage like that of a gank-a-geddon (drone flight time.. etc) plus the rax because vunrable on its way to its target it levels things out.


Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 15:01:00 - [658]

Originally by: Tennotsukai
So, the problem is in fact the plate and not the drone bay of the rax?
But because people don't want to lose their extra 3k of armour, they instead want to nerf the rax.
Sorry, but those who are saying that the drone bay isn't the problem, its the plate are looking to be right. The whole argument shouldn't be about the rax being uber because of its drones.. its in fact the rax is uber because of the 1600mm plate.


Congrats, you took something that was already removed before you posted, and got it all wrong. I removed it, but as i believe that you aren't going to remove what you posted, here's what i wanted to write and decided not to: And that is exactly why there is not hope whatsoever to defeat a tanked thorax in any close range cruiser in a world without plates. The close range thorax will die to any long range gank fitting, and kill other close range cruisers with its massive damage advantage coming from drones. Hence, nobody will ever fit a cruiser for close range except to fight other classes. Most cruiser cannot catch frigs, and cannot be a threat to BS without a plate, hence short range cruisers are ruled out of the game. Long range cruisers still die to bs in a painful death.

Trying to make a point when quoting something before it gets edited isn't working good, ok ?

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.
---
I have the scientific evidence that some people can write but cannot read.
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy
Chronics of ordinary hate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 15:01:00 - [659]

Originally by: Tennotsukai
So, the problem is in fact the plate and not the drone bay of the rax?
But because people don't want to lose their extra 3k of armour, they instead want to nerf the rax.
Sorry, but those who are saying that the drone bay isn't the problem, its the plate are looking to be right. The whole argument shouldn't be about the rax being uber because of its drones.. its in fact the rax is uber because of the 1600mm plate.


Congrats, you took something that was already removed before you posted, and got it all wrong. I removed it, but as i believe that you aren't going to remove what you posted, here's what i wanted to write and decided not to: And that is exactly why there is not hope whatsoever to defeat a tanked thorax in any close range cruiser in a world without plates. The close range thorax will die to any long range gank fitting, and kill other close range cruisers with its massive damage advantage coming from drones. Hence, nobody will ever fit a cruiser for close range except to fight other classes. Most cruiser cannot catch frigs, and cannot be a threat to BS without a plate, hence short range cruisers are ruled out of the game. Long range cruisers still die to bs in a painful death.

Trying to make a point when quoting something before it gets edited isn't working good, ok ?

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.

In Rust We Trust
Toshiro Khan
Toshiro Khan

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 15:03:00 - [660]

Originally by: Naughty Boy

* keep the plates, remove the drone bay:
The blaster-thorax becomes viable and desirableagain as it has to fit blasters to be a close range boat (needing damage and not able to rely only on the drone bay). Plate setup still beat gank setup, which mean longer and more enjoyable fight. Thorax can still heavily outdamage any cruiser at close range and even break a dual rep apoc tank alone.




Erm... when you fit 1600mm plate, on a rax you can't fit med blasters.. so that doesn't bring back the blaster-rax .. unless your planning on making it so the rax can fit 1600mm plate and med blasters.. but then it would still leave things overpowered.

The problem is clearly the plate, and the majority of people asking for the rax, drone bay to be nerfed are in fact trying to hide the problem of the plate.
   
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 38 :: one page
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page
 
Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,58s, ref 20250620/0235
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.