Monitor this thread via RSS [?]
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 38 :: one page
Author Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy
Chronics of ordinary hate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 22:49:00 - [181]

Edited by: Naughty Boy on 23/08/2005 22:54:58
Quote:
Wrong, it is a close range, heavy damage dealer. Including both drones and blasters.
The fact that the thorax has more drone bay than the vexor makes the vexor very unappealing in comparison. You are also hidding a large part of my reply here. I did not do that with any of you arguments.

Quote:
Why? It is in a higher tier, in the drone specialist race...
See my moa analogy. There is no sence giving the moa more missile hardpoints than to the caracal.

Quote:
Ok, so drones track well, but take time to find thier target and start the damage, and they can be destroyed without destroying the ship.
I was messing around with a plated rifter around a shield tanked mining megathron. In a fast close orbit his Ogre drones slaughtered me, and i wasn't webbed or nossed or whatever. Whatever you think, no drawback will be harsh enough to compensate for that, no matter what you think.

Quote:
And as I said, the thorax doesnt get "BS fitting" on drones. The Gallente BSs all have larger dronebays.
Common! Give the moa 3 cruise launchers, it has less than the scorpion so all is fine and all. Stop that, you are not funny.

Quote:
It isn't a t3 cruiser either. The thorax has fewer slots than every other t3 cruiser.
So you want the thorax to have as many slots as others tier 3 cruisers, yet my caracal shall not get as many slots than other tier 2 cruisers because IT IS NOT A FRICKIN TIER 3 cruiser ? What is that for a reason.

Quote:
Ill agree to chopping it's dronebay then, on the condition that it is given more PG/CPU AND more slots.
Okay, so be it, all fine to me. At least we agree on something. But what slot ? It is not THAT simple.

Quote:
The Brutix is a specialty ship, so I dont consider it a "class above". Nor do I consider a destroyer a "class above" frigs. But I can respect that. Fine, there is *one* ship above it with less.
That is an uncommon conception, seeing as they are designed to kill said classes. A battlecruiser, in my mind, was designed to kill cruisers and hence, is in a class above. Fair enough.

Quote:
They are the same class of ship. Specialty designs, variations on the thorax... you have no argument here.
Assault cruisers are still cruisers, ok. But to be honest i fail to see the relevance here.

Quote:
With MAX skills (note that this is more training time then the gunnery skills listed), using the most damaging drone (also lowest speed and tracking), 8 drones do 176.
I didn't have the exact numbers to do the math, i stand corrected. This just doesn't prove the whole debate irrelevant by any mean, it's not like that was the only argument.

Quote:
Well isnt that convenient for you?

As far as i can tell we are not comparing the total damage output of the thorax with the total damage output of the raven. We are comparing the drones of the thorax (his main damage source currently, in the particular setup that is showing the problem we are discussing) VS the damage output of a pre-patch torp-raven (counting only his main damage source). That seemed fair to me, but i see how convenient it is to you to write what you write. We were comparing comparable things, you propose not to.

Quote:
With no skill over 3, a megathron with 7 425mm rails with AM does over 225 DPS, with another 220 from drones, for a total of 445+. This is without dmg mods.
See above.
Quote:
Not you, just the argument. The argument is retarded. Should have been clear by that fact that I neither mentioned names, nor quoted.
How exactly is the argument retarded ? Because you said so ? How convenient.

(continued)

In Rust We Trust
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 22:50:00 - [182]

Edited by: Naughty Boy on 23/08/2005 22:51:09
Quote:
No, you tweeked numbers for the sole purpose of making yourself look right.
The only number that i had wrong was the drone damage, it was off by 13% if i account max skills and maybe 25% if you downgrade skills to similar level. This, in no way, does make you right about everything.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy
Chronics of ordinary hate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 22:50:00 - [183]

Edited by: Naughty Boy on 23/08/2005 22:51:09
Quote:
No, you tweeked numbers for the sole purpose of making yourself look right.
The only number that i had wrong was the drone damage, it was off by 13% if i account max skills and maybe 25% if you downgrade skills to similar level. This, in no way, does make you right about everything.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.

In Rust We Trust
Joshua Foiritain
Joshua Foiritain

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 22:51:00 - [184]

Originally by: Jatonix
Originally by: Joshua Foiritain
Rax indeed is overpowered, put it next to a Vigilant and laugh at all the people who paid money for one Wink

However, i do agree that all t1 cruisers should be like the rax in terms of overall strength. As it is the Thorax is placed quite high above the rest though Smile



TBVFH you havent even taken a look at the vigilants bonuss, it has a extra mid slot, its get 25% bonus to cap recharge, it has more armor, more shield more strcuture its tougher, it just done have asilly sized drone bay, i still a fitted viglant would tear apart a thorax

Myt Thorax Vs corp members Vigi = Me Win.
My Vigi vs corp Thorax = He win.
We tried every setuo we could imagine, 8 Ogres will *****a vigi without any real problems. Especially since the thorax can deak 4 damage types.

The Vigi's bonusus are cute but they dont compare to 8 ogres.
------------------

[Coreli Corporation Mainframe]
Joshua Foiritain
Joshua Foiritain
Gallente
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 22:51:00 - [185]

Originally by: Jatonix
Originally by: Joshua Foiritain
Rax indeed is overpowered, put it next to a Vigilant and laugh at all the people who paid money for one Wink

However, i do agree that all t1 cruisers should be like the rax in terms of overall strength. As it is the Thorax is placed quite high above the rest though Smile



TBVFH you havent even taken a look at the vigilants bonuss, it has a extra mid slot, its get 25% bonus to cap recharge, it has more armor, more shield more strcuture its tougher, it just done have asilly sized drone bay, i still a fitted viglant would tear apart a thorax

Myt Thorax Vs corp members Vigi = Me Win.
My Vigi vs corp Thorax = He win.
We tried every setuo we could imagine, 8 Ogres will *****a vigi without any real problems. Especially since the thorax can deak 4 damage types.

The Vigi's bonusus are cute but they dont compare to 8 ogres.
-----

[Coreli Corporation Mainframe]
Voltron
Voltron

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:00:00 - [186]

Originally by: Fidelis Deus
10 medium drones is approximately 50 dps.

Secondly, without a plate, a cruiser is dead very very fast.


No its not........you just have to pick and choose your fights.....i've been flying the same stupid stabber for about a week now......no freakin clue how its still alive, it has no plate and only a small rep....and it sees pvp daily, not ganksquad pvp either.

Volt
Voltron
Voltron
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:00:00 - [187]

Originally by: Fidelis Deus
10 medium drones is approximately 50 dps.

Secondly, without a plate, a cruiser is dead very very fast.


No its not........you just have to pick and choose your fights.....i've been flying the same stupid stabber for about a week now......no freakin clue how its still alive, it has no plate and only a small rep....and it sees pvp daily, not ganksquad pvp either.

Volt
It's great touching your own dink isn't it?

Fidelis Deus
Fidelis Deus

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:03:00 - [188]

If you pick your fights, yeah, any ship will last for a bit. Unforetunately, without plates battleships can press that instawin button against cruisers.
Fidelis Deus
Fidelis Deus

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:03:00 - [189]

If you pick your fights, yeah, any ship will last for a bit. Unforetunately, without plates battleships can press that instawin button against cruisers.
Garreck
Garreck

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:09:00 - [190]

Originally by: Naughty Boy
The drones carriers can (vexor and arbitrator). The thorax is a blaster ship not a drone ship.


Wrong.

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

Aside from the drone bonus on the Vexor (an added bonus when cruisers were beefed up a while back, not an original feature) drones are not even mentioned in the description.

Meanwhile, the Thorax description makes mention of blasters and "hordes of drones" to take apart its enemy.

Thorax has low grid compared to other cruisers. Thorax has fewer slots compared to cruisers in its class. It makes up for this with "hordes of drones." There are ways to beat thoraxes...and a rupture with tech 2 howies can do it easily...particularly if the thorax is mwd-ing.

The thorax needs its superior DoT because it has less time to do that damage in. Plain and simple. Having to run at least 15 seconds through withering fire with mwd on before you can land a single hit is punishing to say the least. Plate almost became a necessity because a non-plated thorax will generally die before it ever gets into blaster range. 1600mm plate means small guns. Small guns means the drones have to take up the burden of damage.

Besides, as established, it is the premier drone cruiser of a drone-favoring race. So this is not a problem.


Garreck
Aeternus Crusade

Aku. Soku. Zan.
Garreck
Garreck
Amarr Border Defense Consortium
Curatores Veritatis Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:09:00 - [191]

Originally by: Naughty Boy
The drones carriers can (vexor and arbitrator). The thorax is a blaster ship not a drone ship.


Wrong.

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

Aside from the drone bonus on the Vexor (an added bonus when cruisers were beefed up a while back, not an original feature) drones are not even mentioned in the description.

Meanwhile, the Thorax description makes mention of blasters and "hordes of drones" to take apart its enemy.

Thorax has low grid compared to other cruisers. Thorax has fewer slots compared to cruisers in its class. It makes up for this with "hordes of drones." There are ways to beat thoraxes...and a rupture with tech 2 howies can do it easily...particularly if the thorax is mwd-ing.

The thorax needs its superior DoT because it has less time to do that damage in. Plain and simple. Having to run at least 15 seconds through withering fire with mwd on before you can land a single hit is punishing to say the least. Plate almost became a necessity because a non-plated thorax will generally die before it ever gets into blaster range. 1600mm plate means small guns. Small guns means the drones have to take up the burden of damage.

Besides, as established, it is the premier drone cruiser of a drone-favoring race. So this is not a problem.


Dragon Slave
Dragon Slave

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:17:00 - [192]

Quote:
Battlecruisers cost ~4x as much, are they 4x more effective?...I seriously doubt it.


What kind of reasoning is that? Can a battleship beat 250+ frigates? Ofcourse not, it's a matter of how much ISK you're willing to pay for extra HP and firepower.
Dragon Slave
Dragon Slave
Gallente
Tranquil Transactions

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:17:00 - [193]

Quote:
Battlecruisers cost ~4x as much, are they 4x more effective?...I seriously doubt it.


What kind of reasoning is that? Can a battleship beat 250+ frigates? Ofcourse not, it's a matter of how much ISK you're willing to pay for extra HP and firepower.
j0sephine
j0sephine

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:19:00 - [194]

"Plate almost became a necessity because a non-plated thorax will generally die before it ever gets into blaster range. 1600mm plate means small guns. Small guns means the drones have to take up the burden of damage."

People flied Thoraxes before the armour plates got the boost. You didn't really hear them ***** "omg i die too fast and don't do enough damage to kill things after i get within range". There wasn't really much *****ing about Thorax being overpowered, either. Was pretty clear deal: you managed to kill approaching Thorax, you won. You didn't, you were screwed.

There's lot of complaints about Thorax' "uberperformance" after the plate boost, though.

Coincidence? maybe... or maybe the 'high damage at price of high fragility' balance thing got tipped somehow. >>;
j0sephine
j0sephine
Caldari
Reikoku
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:19:00 - [195]

"Plate almost became a necessity because a non-plated thorax will generally die before it ever gets into blaster range. 1600mm plate means small guns. Small guns means the drones have to take up the burden of damage."

People flied Thoraxes before the armour plates got the boost. You didn't really hear them ***** "omg i die too fast and don't do enough damage to kill things after i get within range". There wasn't really much *****ing about Thorax being overpowered, either. Was pretty clear deal: you managed to kill approaching Thorax, you won. You didn't, you were screwed.

There's lot of complaints about Thorax' "uberperformance" after the plate boost, though.

Coincidence? maybe... or maybe the 'high damage at price of high fragility' balance thing got tipped somehow. >>;
Kaylana Syi
Kaylana Syi

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:20:00 - [196]

Originally by: Garreck
Originally by: Naughty Boy
The drones carriers can (vexor and arbitrator). The thorax is a blaster ship not a drone ship.


Wrong.

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

Aside from the drone bonus on the Vexor (an added bonus when cruisers were beefed up a while back, not an original feature) drones are not even mentioned in the description.

Meanwhile, the Thorax description makes mention of blasters and "hordes of drones" to take apart its enemy.

Thorax has low grid compared to other cruisers. Thorax has fewer slots compared to cruisers in its class. It makes up for this with "hordes of drones." There are ways to beat thoraxes...and a rupture with tech 2 howies can do it easily...particularly if the thorax is mwd-ing.

The thorax needs its superior DoT because it has less time to do that damage in. Plain and simple. Having to run at least 15 seconds through withering fire with mwd on before you can land a single hit is punishing to say the least. Plate almost became a necessity because a non-plated thorax will generally die before it ever gets into blaster range. 1600mm plate means small guns. Small guns means the drones have to take up the burden of damage.

Besides, as established, it is the premier drone cruiser of a drone-favoring race. So this is not a problem.




To use your own argument... the MWD bonus wasn't an original feature of the Thorax so. So don't go tearing down one bonus based argument then assume your stance around one.

Second...the DEVS wanted to curb the drones before and were yelled out of it because of carebear miners. Look I don't want the thorax to die a horrible nerf. I want it balanced. Its overpowered in PvE and in PvP. We aren't talking about roles here... like it being a primary Kin, Therm damage dealer so it needs to kill Minmatar and Amarr ships not Caldari or Gallente. We are talking about it being able to kill ANY ship with ease and not because it can fit a plate. ANY combat cruiser can fit a plate. The problem TODAY lies with the drone bay and the drone bay alone. This doesn't mean we don't think it needs boosting, because if they take the drones from it then it most certainly will. But all cruisers could stand a boost somewhere to make them even more attractive. PvP would benefit from it in general because of less money lost. ATM... too many people stay in empire because they don't want to loose their BS, HAC and faction ships. Give them a reason to use cruisers and you will see the true EXODUS to 0.0.
jide's oBject eXplorer
The Nest
Kaylana Syi
Kaylana Syi
Minmatar
The Nest
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:20:00 - [197]

Originally by: Garreck
Originally by: Naughty Boy
The drones carriers can (vexor and arbitrator). The thorax is a blaster ship not a drone ship.


Wrong.

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

Aside from the drone bonus on the Vexor (an added bonus when cruisers were beefed up a while back, not an original feature) drones are not even mentioned in the description.

Meanwhile, the Thorax description makes mention of blasters and "hordes of drones" to take apart its enemy.

Thorax has low grid compared to other cruisers. Thorax has fewer slots compared to cruisers in its class. It makes up for this with "hordes of drones." There are ways to beat thoraxes...and a rupture with tech 2 howies can do it easily...particularly if the thorax is mwd-ing.

The thorax needs its superior DoT because it has less time to do that damage in. Plain and simple. Having to run at least 15 seconds through withering fire with mwd on before you can land a single hit is punishing to say the least. Plate almost became a necessity because a non-plated thorax will generally die before it ever gets into blaster range. 1600mm plate means small guns. Small guns means the drones have to take up the burden of damage.

Besides, as established, it is the premier drone cruiser of a drone-favoring race. So this is not a problem.




To use your own argument... the MWD bonus wasn't an original feature of the Thorax so. So don't go tearing down one bonus based argument then assume your stance around one.

Second...the DEVS wanted to curb the drones before and were yelled out of it because of carebear miners. Look I don't want the thorax to die a horrible nerf. I want it balanced. Its overpowered in PvE and in PvP. We aren't talking about roles here... like it being a primary Kin, Therm damage dealer so it needs to kill Minmatar and Amarr ships not Caldari or Gallente. We are talking about it being able to kill ANY ship with ease and not because it can fit a plate. ANY combat cruiser can fit a plate. The problem TODAY lies with the drone bay and the drone bay alone. This doesn't mean we don't think it needs boosting, because if they take the drones from it then it most certainly will. But all cruisers could stand a boost somewhere to make them even more attractive. PvP would benefit from it in general because of less money lost. ATM... too many people stay in empire because they don't want to loose their BS, HAC and faction ships. Give them a reason to use cruisers and you will see the true EXODUS to 0.0.

Team Minmatar
Carriers need Clone Vats
Garreck
Garreck

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:23:00 - [198]

Now, j0sephine, you're talking about something completely different. I can at least yield to (if not completely buy into) the idea that battleship-sized plate makes a thorax overpowered. Much like battleship sized afterburners did for certain cruisers. But drones are a thoraxes bread and butter, and this thread makes the rediculous case that its drone capacity should be cut in half.


Garreck
Aeternus Crusade

Aku. Soku. Zan.
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:23:00 - [199]

Originally by: Garreck
The thorax needs its superior DoT because it has less time to do that damage in. Plain and simple. Having to run at least 15 seconds through withering fire with mwd on before you can land a single hit is punishing to say the least. Plate almost became a necessity because a non-plated thorax will generally die before it ever gets into blaster range. 1600mm plate means small guns. Small guns means the drones have to take up the burden of damage.


And, if it fits small pulse/beams/rails instead of small blaster, you have a "i win" button.

What the thorax has to do is what EVERY CRUISER HAS TO DO outside of niche role, as sniping for moa, rupture, and caracal. Well all know how that last part blows so give us a break with that. It is never funny to stay in a cruiser at the optimal of a battleship, mwd'ing to it or staying there sniping.

But, to top it up, after fitting the almost necessary plate and frig guns*, you have 150 dps of drones, when other tier 3 cruiser get a nos and extra resist (maller), an extra mid and no agility to speak of (moa) or the ability to use the smallest autocannon and thus, not wasting a bonus and still having decent tracking. To bad you need the bonus to be on par with other gun types.

If you think that 150 dps is as good as the other bonus, well... Confused

*By the way, fitting frigate guns on a cruiser, plates or not, is not a sacrifice unless you are sniping. See above. Tracking is much more important, and the lowest damage more than makes up for it.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.
Garreck
Garreck
Amarr Border Defense Consortium
Curatores Veritatis Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:23:00 - [200]

Edited by: Garreck on 23/08/2005 23:28:32
Now, j0sephine, you're talking about something completely different. I can at least yield to (if not completely buy into) the idea that battleship-sized plate makes a thorax overpowered. Much like battleship sized afterburners did for certain cruisers. But drones are a thoraxes bread and butter, and this thread makes the rediculous case that its drone capacity should be cut in half.

Originally by: Kaylana Syi

To use your own argument... the MWD bonus wasn't an original feature of the Thorax so. So don't go tearing down one bonus based argument then assume your stance around one.



I'm not basing any arguments on bonuses. I'm basing arguments on descriptions. The Vexor is a good, all-round surviveable combat ship. The thorax is a drone boat. Plain and simple. The drone bonus for the vexor actually allowed it to fill that roll better (Vexor was plain garbage before the change) and the mwd bonus allowed the thorax to fill its roll better as well. No, I'm not implying a double-standard.

Why not fix the "plate" issue? A common-sense precident has already been set with afterburners and mwd's...so why not with armor plate? I can concede that it makes no sense for a 1600mm plate to have the same effect on the velocity and agility of my thorax as a 400mm plate. If thoraxes stop showing up to combat with battleship size hit-points, everybody is quickly going to see how vulnerable a ship it truly is.


Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy
Chronics of ordinary hate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:23:00 - [201]

Originally by: Garreck
The thorax needs its superior DoT because it has less time to do that damage in. Plain and simple. Having to run at least 15 seconds through withering fire with mwd on before you can land a single hit is punishing to say the least. Plate almost became a necessity because a non-plated thorax will generally die before it ever gets into blaster range. 1600mm plate means small guns. Small guns means the drones have to take up the burden of damage.


And, if it fits small pulse/beams/rails instead of small blaster, you have a "i win" button.

What the thorax has to do is what EVERY CRUISER HAS TO DO outside of niche role, as sniping for moa, rupture, and caracal. Well all know how that last part blows so give us a break with that. It is never funny to stay in a cruiser at the optimal of a battleship, mwd'ing to it or staying there sniping.

But, to top it up, after fitting the almost necessary plate and frig guns*, you have 150 dps of drones, when other tier 3 cruiser get a nos and extra resist (maller), an extra mid and no agility to speak of (moa) or the ability to use the smallest autocannon and thus, not wasting a bonus and still having decent tracking. To bad you need the bonus to be on par with other gun types.

If you think that 150 dps is as good as the other bonus, well... Confused

*By the way, fitting frigate guns on a cruiser, plates or not, is not a sacrifice unless you are sniping. See above. Tracking is much more important, and the lowest damage more than makes up for it.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.

In Rust We Trust
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:25:00 - [202]

Originally by: Garreck
Besides, as established, it is the premier drone cruiser of a drone-favoring race. So this is not a problem.


Give me 6 missiles hardpoint and 4 gun hardpoints, plsu the fitting for it, on my moa, and there will be no problem either.

God, i was almost going to type that in all caps, in hope you would see easily how wrong that is.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy
Chronics of ordinary hate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:25:00 - [203]

Originally by: Garreck
Besides, as established, it is the premier drone cruiser of a drone-favoring race. So this is not a problem.


Give me 6 missiles hardpoint and 4 gun hardpoints, plsu the fitting for it, on my moa, and there will be no problem either.

God, i was almost going to type that in all caps, in hope you would see easily how wrong that is.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.

In Rust We Trust
j0sephine
j0sephine

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:28:00 - [204]

Edited by: j0sephine on 23/08/2005 23:29:03

"Now, j0sephine, you're talking about something completely different. I can at least yield to (if not completely buy into) the idea that battleship-sized plate makes a thorax overpowered."

It's probably the combination of these two things that makes thing go out of whack ^^;

Thorax with heavy drones but light defense: okay
Thorax with good armour but light weapons: okay
Thorax with heavy drones and good armour: omgwtfbbq

one has to give... and i suppose it's easier for people to ask about nerf aimed specifically at one ship that stands out the most(Thorax' drone bay) instead of all cruisers (oversized plates) ^^;;
j0sephine
j0sephine
Caldari
Reikoku
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:28:00 - [205]

Edited by: j0sephine on 23/08/2005 23:29:03

"Now, j0sephine, you're talking about something completely different. I can at least yield to (if not completely buy into) the idea that battleship-sized plate makes a thorax overpowered."

It's probably the combination of these two things that makes thing go out of whack ^^;

Thorax with heavy drones but light defense: okay
Thorax with good armour but light weapons: okay
Thorax with heavy drones and good armour: omgwtfbbq

one has to give... and i suppose it's easier for people to ask about nerf aimed specifically at one ship that stands out the most(Thorax' drone bay) instead of all cruisers (oversized plates) ^^;;
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:30:00 - [206]

Edited by: Naughty Boy on 23/08/2005 23:29:50
Originally by: j0sephine
Thorax with heavy drones and good armour: omgwtfbbq

And if you add small long range guns to that, you have a monster.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.
Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy
Chronics of ordinary hate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:30:00 - [207]

Edited by: Naughty Boy on 23/08/2005 23:29:50
Originally by: j0sephine
Thorax with heavy drones and good armour: omgwtfbbq

And if you add small long range guns to that, you have a monster.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.

In Rust We Trust
Garreck
Garreck

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:32:00 - [208]

Edited by: Garreck on 23/08/2005 23:34:29
Originally by: Naughty Boy
Originally by: Garreck
Besides, as established, it is the premier drone cruiser of a drone-favoring race. So this is not a problem.


Give me 6 missiles hardpoint and 4 gun hardpoints, plsu the fitting for it, on my moa, and there will be no problem either.



Ignorance.

Originally by: j0sephine
Edited by: j0sephine on 23/08/2005 23:29:03


Thorax with heavy drones but light defense: okay
Thorax with good armour but light weapons: okay
Thorax with heavy drones and good armour: omgwtfbbq

one has to give...


She's right. But let's go for quality and nerf the plate instead of nonsensical shortcut and nerf the drones. I can deal with a fragile thorax. I do it all the time now anyway, 'cause frankly I don't like giving up the damage bonuses for medium hybrids.

*edit*
Besides...nerf the drones on the thorax, and the plate WILL become an issue with another cruiser that steps up as "overpowered." Fix the right thing on the thorax, and we can save a lot of balancing heart-ache in the future.




Garreck
Aeternus Crusade

Aku. Soku. Zan.
Garreck
Garreck
Amarr Border Defense Consortium
Curatores Veritatis Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:32:00 - [209]

Edited by: Garreck on 23/08/2005 23:34:29
Originally by: Naughty Boy
Originally by: Garreck
Besides, as established, it is the premier drone cruiser of a drone-favoring race. So this is not a problem.


Give me 6 missiles hardpoint and 4 gun hardpoints, plsu the fitting for it, on my moa, and there will be no problem either.



Ignorance.

Originally by: j0sephine
Edited by: j0sephine on 23/08/2005 23:29:03


Thorax with heavy drones but light defense: okay
Thorax with good armour but light weapons: okay
Thorax with heavy drones and good armour: omgwtfbbq

one has to give...


She's right. But let's go for quality and nerf the plate instead of nonsensical shortcut and nerf the drones. I can deal with a fragile thorax. I do it all the time now anyway, 'cause frankly I don't like giving up the damage bonuses for medium hybrids.

*edit*
Besides...nerf the drones on the thorax, and the plate WILL become an issue with another cruiser that steps up as "overpowered." Fix the right thing on the thorax, and we can save a lot of balancing heart-ache in the future.




Naughty Boy
Naughty Boy

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.23 23:35:00 - [210]

Edited by: Naughty Boy on 23/08/2005 23:50:37
Originally by: Garreck
Ignorance.
I'd like to be less ignorant. Care to explain ?

Edit: Caldari are long range, that mean railguns and missiles. So it is ok to have railguns and missiles on the same ships, and it is ok if the moa, despite being primarily a gunboat, has more missiles launchers than the caracal because it is a higher thier ship.

This is perfectly logic according to your own logic, so take that IGNORANCE statement back. Or, please reconsider your previous affirmation regarding the fact that the thorax has both more drones and more guns than the specialized drone carrier, and that is it perfectly fine. Thank you.

Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.
   
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 38 :: one page
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page
 
Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,19s, ref 20250619/0755
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.